Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 13, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. There is a couple of domestic relations cases, one of which turns on an appellate jurisdiction issue. Then there are two direct criminal appeals, an MTCA case, and attorney’s fees case.

In Re Guardianship of K.G.W.: Garland v. Bunch, 2024-CA-01325-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Dismissing appeal stemming from a guardianship, holding that the Court lacked jurisdiction on the appeal taken under section 11-43-53 because there had been no trial of a habeas corpus.
(10-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)

O’Quin v. Davaul, 2024-CP-01327-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming dismissal of a complaint against the county tax assessor and granting judgment on the pleadings for failing to comply with MTCA requirements, holding that the pro se appellant’s arguments were without merit and were procedurally barred for failing to comply with the rules of appellate procedure.
(10-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)

Fraser v. State, 2023-KA-01129-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of culpable negligence manslaughter, holding that even if admission of emails and photographs from the victim’s phone showing past abuse was error it was harmless, that the trial court did not err in admitting an email from the defendant into evidence or in limiting the defendant’s expert witness’s testimony, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Elkins v. State, 2024-KA-00597-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that there were no issues warranting reversal after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Covington County Bank v. Scott Tractor & Equipment Company, 2024-CA-01071-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s denial of attorney’s fees, holding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the request for attorney’s fees that was sought after the defendant paid the debt with accrued interest on the same day the creditor filed a motion for entry of default.
(7-3: Westbrooks for the Court; Emfinger dissented, joined by Wilson and Lawrence)

Aultman v. Aultman, 2024-CA-00746-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part in a divorce case, holding that the chancellor erred with respect to the valuation of a home and remanding to reconsider valuation and equitable distribution but holding that the chancellor did not err in valuing an ESIP, retirement, and PERS accounts, did not err in awarding attorney’s fees for successful contempt proceedings.
(8-1-0: Carlton for the Court: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lassitter St. Pe’ did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Ryals v. State, 2023-KA-01192-COA (ordering the circuit clerk to supplement the appellate record with the transcript of the jury instruction conference by a date certain and further ordering that if it is not received by that date that the court reporter shall appear before the Court at a show cause hearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 8, 2026

While Judge Maxwell and Judge Chamberlin adjust to their new roles on federal bench, the seven remaining members of the Mississippi Supreme Court soldier on dispensing justice on the State’s Highest Court. Today, they handed down two opinions in direct criminal appeals.

Wallace v. State, 2024-KA-00413-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the indictment was not defective and that the defendant was estopped from arguing on appeal that the indictment was constructively amended by a jury instruction, that the evidence was sufficient, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying a motion for new trial that asserted new evidence.
(7-0: Sullivan for the Court)

Hollingsworth v. State, 2024-KA-00908-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth, holding that it was not error for the prosecutor to make a statement about a witness who was not called because the witness was more accessible to the defendant than the State.
(7-0: Coleman for the Court)

Hand Downs

  • In Re: Court Improvement Program Statewide Multi-Disciplinary Task Force, 89-R-99037-SCT (appointing members of the Court Improvement Program Statewide Disciplinary Task Force)
  • Stephney v. State, 2023-CT-00936-SCT (denying cert)
  • Tubbs v. State, 2023-KA-01124-SCT (granting Office of Indigent Appeals’ motion for authority to pay contract counsel)
  • Quinn v. State, 2023-CT-01143-SCT (denying cert)
  • Mi Pueblo Mexican Restaurant, LLC v. Breakfast Cove, LLC, 2024-CA-00271-SCT (granting motion to stay appeal and ordering the trial court to rule on a Rule 60(b) motion)
  • Carroll v. State, 2024-CT-00875-SCT (dismissing pro se cert petition)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 6, 2026

Happy New Year! The Mississippi Court of Appeals wasted no time getting up and running. They kicked the year off with six opinions. Amidst the PCR opinions is a couple of noteworthy tales of caution for litigants pertaining to discovery and appellate procedure.

Seals v. State, 2024-KM-00448-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Affirming conviction of simple assault, holding that that the evidence was sufficient and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-1-0: Weddle for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; Emfinger did not participate)

Simoneaux v. State, 2024-CP-01127-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of the petitioner’s fourth PCR motion, holding that the motion was time-barred, successive, and failed to to demonstrate that a statutory exception applies.
(9-0: Weddle for the Court; McCarty did not participate)

Patton v. MDOC, 2024-CA-00699-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for the plaintiff’s failure to cooperate in discovery, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion dismissing the claim as a sanction for violating the rules of discovery and the court’s order compelling discovery.
(8-2: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald dissented without writing)

Vasques v. State, 2024-CP-00852-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in summarily dismissing the motion as time-barred and that the circuit court’s err in not transferring the motion to the proper venue was harmless because the motion lacked merit.
(7-3-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson and Weddle concurred in part and in the result without writing’ Emfinger concurred in result only without writing)

Polk v. State, 2025-CP-00260-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motions, holding that several of the claims were waived or procedurally barred and that the dismissal was proper because the petitioner raised no challenge to the validity of his guilty plea.
(9-0: McDonald for the Court; Weddle did not participate)

Ford Motor Company v. Bingham, 2024-CA-01056-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s judgment granting a motion to dismiss the appeal and awarding attorney’s fees, holding that the appellant did not comply with the cost bond requirement, that the “appeal bond with supersedeas” did not qualify as a cost bond, that the appellant did not demonstrate “extenuating circumstances” to excuse the jurisdictional defect, affirming the award of attorney’s fees, and denying the motion to dismiss the instant appeal.
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Taylor v. State, 2023-CT-00738-SCT (denying motion to vacate opinion and dismiss appeal and motion for rehearing)
  • Thomas v. State, 2023-CT-01151-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Cooper v. State, 2024-KA-00592-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Ruffin v. State, 2024-CA-00867-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 16, 2025

As the year draws the a close, the Mississippi Court of Appeals is finishing strong with seven opinions handed down today. There were three domestic relations cases, two felony appeals, one misdemeanor appeal, and an undue influence case.

Rasbeery v. State, 2024-KA-01005-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth with a firearm enhancement, holding that the conviction of constructive possession was supported by sufficient evidence, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that the trial court did not err in denying a motion suppress the defendant’s roadside statements.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Lucas v. Estate of Lucas, 2024-CA-01259-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision invalidating a gift and setting aside a deed, holding that the grantee did not provide sufficient evidence overcome the presumption of undue influence.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

J.T.S. v. M.L.S., 2024-CA-00023-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part a chancellor’s decision in a divorce case, holding that the Court had appellate jurisdiction, that the chancery court did not in dismissing several counts of the amended complaint, that the chancellor did err in modifying the life insurance provision of the divorce agreement, that the chancellor did not err in enforcing a provision limiting reimbursement of medical expenses, that the chancellor did not err in assessing post-judgment interest, that the chancellor did not err in finding that one party had no obligation to contribute to condo or allowance expenses, that the chancery court did not abuse its discretion in crediting payments as child support, that the chancellor did err in awarding attorney’s fees without specific findings, and that there was no merit to the claim that the chancellor was impartial.
(7-1-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence and St. Pe’ did not participate)

Turner v. State, 2024-KM-01020-COA, consolidated with 2024-KM-01028-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Affirming convictions of speeding and careless driving on appeal from justice court, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction which was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and that the trial court did not impermissibly place the burden of proof on the defendant.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Odom v. State, 2023-KA-01165-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and armed robbery, holding that the jury was not so improperly instructed on self-defense as to warrant reversal and that the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction.
(9-1-0: Wilson for the Court; Barnes concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Bradshaw v. Bradshaw, 2024-CA-00882-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment of contempt, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding the ex-husband in willful contempt for failing to pay court-ordered alimony or in reducing his monthly periodic alimony payment.
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Thornton v. Thornton, 2024-CA-00320-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s judgment in a divorce case, holding that the chancery court did not abuse its discretion awarding joint legal and physical custody, that the chancellor did not err in distribution of marital property or in personal property.
(7-1-2: Barnes for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Carlton concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McCarty)

Other Orders

  • Parra v. Rapid-American Corporation, 2023-CA-01196-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Buck v. State, 2024-KA-00025-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Tauzin v. Tauzin, 2024-CA-00141-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of December 11, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One is a voluntary dismissal versus summary judgment dispute and the other addressed where venue was waived by removal to federal court once the case was remanded. There are also two cert grants among today’s orders.

Busby v. The Lamar Company, LLC, 2023-CA-00892-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the trial court’s decision to grant the plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal and deny the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and for attorney’s fees, explaining that the only difference in the outcome is the award of attorney’s fees which is within the trial court’s discretion.
(8-0: Maxwell for the Court; Branning did not participate)

Benchmark Insurance Company v. Harris, 2024-IA-00813-SCT (Civil – Insurance)
Reversing the trial court’s decision denying the defendant’s motion to transfer venue, holding that the defendant did not waive its objection to venue by first removing the case to federal court (to a district that encompassed both the improper and proper state court venues) prior to filing an answer in state court and then filing a motion to transfer venue on remand.
(9-0: Maxwell for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Elmore v. Elmore, 2023-CT-00875-SCT (granting cert)
  • McFall v. Osborne, 2023-CT-01234-SCT (denying cert)
  • Mortera v. Kona Villa Owners Association, Inc., 2023-CT-01297-SCT (granting cert)
  • Okorie v. Citizens Bank, 2024-CT-00462-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 9, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions yesterday. Three are appeals of felony convictions and the others are an heirship case, a worker’s comp case, and a reversal in a PCR case.

Oats v. State, 2024-KA-00278-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for mistrial after the jury declared itself hung and that the issue was doubly procedurally-barred and that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of it.
(7-3: Lawrence for the Court; McDonald dissented without writing; Westbrook dissented, joined by McDonald and Lassitter St. Pe’)

Chamblee v. State, 2024-KA-00556-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of gratification of lust, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for change of venue, in denying a motion for mistrial, in excluding false-accusation evidence, or in excluding sexually explicit photographs, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Physicians’ Pain and Spin Specialists, PLLC v. Kluczkowski, 2025-WC-00069-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s finding that the employer was subject to the MWCA and that the claimant sustained a compensable injury, holding that there was substantial evidence that the employer regularly employed at least five employees and that the claimant presented substantial evidence of a compensable injury.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

O’Callaghan v. State, 2024-KA-00415-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of possession of a controlled substance, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding holding trial in absentia or in denying the defendant’s motion for mistrial based on a juror’s remark.
(7-3-0: Carlton for the Court; Westbrooks and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Estate of Dorsey v. Matory, 2024-CA-00925-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancery court’s judgment in an heirship dispute, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that a prior adoption petition and proceeding constituted an adjudication of paternity of and legitimacy, that the adopted child was an heir-at-law of his biological father entitled to a share of his estate, or that equity favored not applying the one-year statute of limitations.
(8-2-0: Barnes for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald and McCarty)

Shelton v. State, 2024-CA-00435-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the denial of a PCR petition, holding that the circuit court clearly erred in holding that a revised State’s expert opinion does not merit reversal and that arguments regarding ineffective assistance and factual innocence are moot since the case was remanded for new trial.
(7-3: Barnes for the Court; Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Lawrence and Weddle)

Other Orders

  • Moyer v. Blades, 2023-CA-01180-COA (denying rehearing)
  • James v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport, 2024-CA-00459 (denying rehearing)
  • Snyder v. Pilger, 2024-CA_00460-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Carroll v. State, 2024-KA-00481-COA (recalling mandate and granting pro se motion for additional time to file motion for rehearing)
  • Cole v. Fish, 2024-CA-00508-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Corr Properties, LLC v. City of Oxford, 2024-CC-00665-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Graves v. State, 2024-KA-00691-COA (recalling mandate and granting pro se motion to file motion for rehearing otu of time)
  • Haddad v. State, 2025-TS-01229-COA (dismissing application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and granting time for the pro se appellat to file the motion in circuit court)
  • Reid v. State, 2025-TS-01261-COA (suspending deadling to file appeal to allow appeal to proceed on its merits)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of December 4, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions yesterday. The most interesting is technically an adoption case, but it involves jurisdictional issues, unwritten local chancery court rules, appellate procedure, and appellate remedies. Both the majority opinion and the partial concurrence/partial dissent are worth your time.

Wiggins v. Southern Securities Group, LLC, 2024-CA-00251-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the trial court’s decision in a contract/business dispute, holding that the trial court did not err in granting one side’s motion for preliminary injunction or in denying the other side’s motion to compel mediation and/or arbitration.
(8-1: Griffis for the Court; Coleman dissented)

In the Matter of L.L.T.: Prince v. Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services, 2024-IA-00824-SCT (Civil – Adoption)
Affirming the youth court’s ruling that it lacked jurisdiction to finalize an adoption against a backdrop of the chancery court refusing set a hearing on adoption petitions, holding that the youth court did not err in finding that it lacked jurisdiction since chancery courts have exclusive jurisdiction.
(5-4: Coleman for the Court; Randolph dissented, joined by Ishee, Griffis, and Branning)

Note – The procedural posture of this one is strange as a result of the chancery court refusing to set a hearing on adoption petitions. The petitioner got creative and initiated the youth court action to create a record for an appeal so that they could seek relief from the appellate courts. The youth court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction and the petitioner was able to appeal. On appeal, the majority of the Supreme Court agreed that the youth court lacked jurisdiction but held that they could not provide any relief other than to affirm the youth court because no other relief was specifically sought. The Supreme Court made it clear that the chancery court should act, but found that it lacked a mechanism based on the issue presented on appeal to compel the chancery court to act. Here is how the majority opinion concluded:

The partial concurrence/partial dissent agreed that the youth court lacked jurisdiction, but was less diplomatic about the chancery court’s conduct and disagreed that Supreme Court’s hands are tied on this appeal:

Other Orders

  • McGee v. State, 2023-CT-00083-SCT (denying cert)
  • Childs v. State, 2023-CT-00126-SCT (denying cert)
  • In the Matter of Estate of Johnson: Manners v. Estate of Johnson, 2023-CT-00823-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • McNaughton v. State, 2023-CT-01099-SCT (denying cert)
  • Caffey v. Forrest Health, 2023-CT-01232-SCT (denying cert)
  • Carr v. State, 2024-CT-00185-SCT (denying cert)
  • Horne v. Dolgencorp LLC, 2024-CT-00376-SCT (denying cert)
  • Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2024-CT-00455-SCT (granting cert)
  • Rogers v. State, 2025-M-00257 (granting application for leave to proceed in the trial court)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 2, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions on Tuesday. Four are criminal appeals. The three civil cases involve child visitation modification, a 12(b)(6) motion, and a motion to compel arbitration.

Holifield v. State, 2023-KA-01320-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction, that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and also declining to address the ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claim on direct appeal.
(8-2-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing’ Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing)

Rodgers v. State, 2024-KA-01116-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that there was sufficient evidence that he possessed a firearm on the date alleged in the indictment.
(9-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)

Cosby v. State, 2024-KA-00518-COA, consolidated with Cosby v. State, 2024-KA-00522-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming two defendants’ convictions of sexual battery of a minor, holding that the trial court did not err by denying their motion for directed verdict or in denying their JNOV, that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction, that the trial court did not err in failing to conduct a pretrial hearing on a tender-years issue, that the trial court did not err in limiting cross-examination of witnesses, and that the plaintiff’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim lacked merit.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Kirkland v. Kirkland, 2024-CA-00801-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s ruling on a visitation modification petition, holding that the chancellor did not abuse her discretion, commit clear error, or manifest error in denying the mother’s petition to modify visitation or in granting the father’s counterclaim for additional visitation.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Martin v. Smith, 2024-CA-01027-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the trial court’s decision granting the defendant’s 12(b)(6) motion, holding that the plaintiff failed to sufficiently state claims for defamation, slander, malicious interference with employment, or intentional infliction of emotional distress under Mississippi’s pleading standard.
(7-2-1: Weddle for the Court; Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Barnes dissented without writing)

Jenkins v. Ford Motor Company, 2024-CA-00994-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the trial court’s decision granting a motion to compel arbitration, holding that although the defendant asserted arbitration in its answer waiting nearly one year before filing a motion to compel arbitration while engaging in the litigation process constituted failure to pursue it.
(6-4: Lawrence for the Court; Emfinger dissented, joined by Barnes, Wilson, and Lassitter St. Pe’)

Practice Point – Arbitration agreements have made a strong showing on here lately. Beware of recycled briefing on arbitration-related issues.

Butler v. State, 2024-KA-00821-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s imperfect self-defense instruction where the trial court also granted the defendant’s self-defense instruction.
(10-0: Westbrooks for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Green v. Presbyterian Day School, 2023-CA-01278-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Luster v. State, 2024-CA-00014-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Brownlee v. State, 2024-CA-00585-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Teel v. Boyd Biloxi, LLC, 2024-CP-00810-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 25, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals served a seasonally-appropriate portion of twelve opinions on Tuesday with nine other orders on the side. You can read about the lot below.

Cummings v. State, 2024-KA-00909-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of first-degree murder, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in the jury instructions given, the trial court did did not abuse its discretion in allowing evidence of other bad acts, the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim was without merit, and that the cumulative error doctrine did not apply.
(7-3: Weddle for the Court; Wilson dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McDonald)

In the Interest of K.B.: A.B.B. v. E.B.S., 2024-CA-00313-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the youth court’s decision terminating parental rights, holding that the natural mother exercised all of the rights that she complained on appeal that the trial court failed to give her including her right to court-appointed counsel.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Bivins v. Ellisville State School, 2024-SA-01098-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision affirming the Mississippi Employee Appeals Board’s decision affirming an employee’s termination, holding that the former employee failed to show that the order was not supported by substantial evidence or was arbitrary and capricious.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Dortch v. State, 2024-KA-01102-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder while engaged in the commission of a robbery after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and independently reviewing the record.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Latham v. State, 2024-KA-00719-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and independently reviewing the record.
(10-0: Lawrence for the Court)

Day v. Day, 2024-CA-00771-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s custody modification order, holding that there was evidence to support the chancellor’s finding of a material change in circumstances and awarding the mother custody and visitation rights for the father.
(9-0: Lawrence for the Court; Weddle did not participate)

Higdon v. Pinkston, 2023-CP-00685-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s grant of summary judgment in a property-line dispute, holding that the chancellor’s decision where the motion for summary judgment was not opposed by a response or evidence at the hearing.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

McLaurin v. State, 2024-KA-00138-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth but reversing sentence as a nonviolent habitual offender, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that there was no plain error in admission of hearsay testimony from an officer, that the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim lacked merit, that the trial court properly excluded proposed hearsay testimony, that the trial court did not err in qualifying the jury venire in the defendant’s absence, that the spousal privilege did not apply to certain testimony, and that matters not raised in the trial court were procedurally barred, but holding that the trial court erred in finding that it lacked sentencing discretion.
(6-4-0: Carlton for the Court; Wilson, McDonald, Emfinger, and Weddle concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Bodie v. State, 2024-KA-00634-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of sexual battery and one count of touching a child for lustful purposes, holding that the defendant’s rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause were not violated.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

CNRS&Z Inc. v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, 2024-CA-00365-COA (Civil – Contracts)
Affirming the trial court’s decision granting a motion to compel arbitration, holding that the trial court did not err in finding a valid and binding arbitration agreement with one of the defendants and that the “close legal relationship” between that defendant and two others allowed them to enforce the arbitration agreement as well.
(5-5: Barnes for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks, McDonald, Lawrence, and Lassitter St. Pe’)

Note – The dissent agreed that the claims against the defendant who signed the arbitration agreement were bound to arbitration, but took issue with binding the claims against the other two defendants:

Estate of Price v. St. Dominic-Jackson Memorial Hospital, 2024-CA-00582-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of a med mal action finding that it was barred by the statute of limitations and that it was an impermissible duplicative action, holding that the plaintiff waived any challenge to the dismissal as an impermissible duplicative action by failing to address it on appeal and that it was therefore unnecessary for the Court to address the statute of limitations issue.
(6-2-0: Wilson for the Court; McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Lassitter St. Pe’ specially concurred, joined by Westbrooks; Barnes and Weddle did not participate.)

Avery v. State, 2024-CP-01044-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing summary dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the motion was sufficient to survive summary dismissal and required the State to answer to motion and provide an explanation for its calculate of the parole eligibility date.
(8-2: Wilson for the Court; Lawrence dissented, joined by Weddle)

Other Orders

  • In the Interest of J.S.: P.S. v. Pearl River County Dept. of CPS, 2023-CA-00932-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Swims v. State, 2023-KA-01244-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Jackson v. State, 2023-KA-01280-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Hinds v. PERS, 2023-SA-01400-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Patterson v. State, 2024-KA-00268-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Brown v. State, 2024-CA-00307-COA (denying hearing)
  • Varnado v. State, 2024-KA-00338-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Polk v. State, 2024-KA-00591-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Wright v. State, 2025-TS-00986-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 20, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion today in a dispute between the Mississippi Department of Medicaid and a group of providers. There was also a bunch of orders related to various sets of rules.

Hattiesburg Medical Park Management Corp., v. Mississippi Division of Medicaid, 2024-SA-00253-SCT (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision affirming DOM’s adjustments to providers’ 2015 cost reports, holding that DOM’s change to its internal policy of not offsetting the dividends received by certain providers without public notice was arbitrary and capricious.
(7-2: Griffis for the Court; King dissented, joined by Coleman)

Other Orders

  • In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (amending MRCP’s introductory statement for Appendix A Forms)
  • In Re: Local Rules, 89-R-99015-SCT (dismissing motion to adopt Local Rule Governing Indigent Counsel Appointment)
  • In Re: Local Rules, 89-R-99015-SCT (granting motion to Amend or in the Alternative, Adopt Local Rule out of the 23rd Circuit Court District)
  • In Re: Local Rules, 89-R-99015-SCT (granting Motion to Amend Local Rules for the 4th Circuit)
  • In Re: Rules of Professional Conduct, 89-R-99018-SCT (granting Petition to Amend Certain Rules of the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct in Order to Define the Practice of Law in Mississippi and Exceptions Thereto and to Prohibit the Unauthorized Practice of Law in Mississippi)
  • Rules for Court Reporters, 89-R-99021-SCT (denying Motion to Amend the Rules and Regulations Governing Certified Court Reporters)
  • In Re: Mississippi Rules of Criminal Procedure, 89-R-99038-SCT (denying Motion to Amend MRCrP 7.2 and Comment Thereto)
  • Roncali v. State, 2023-CT-00173-SCT (granting cert)
  • Davis v. State, 2023-CT-00884-SCT (denying cert)
  • Harris v. State, 2024-CT-00231-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page