Tag: Real Property

Mississippi Court of Appeals, Decisions of August 11, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions today. We got a real property special exception case, a PCR case, a products liability case, a distribution of marital property case, and a direct criminal appeal.

City of Natchez v. Banks, 2025-CA-00408-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the Circuit Court’s decision reversing the Natchez Planning Commission, holding that the Commission acted outside its apparent authority by revoking a special exception.
(10-0: Emfinger for the court)

Robertson v. State, 2025-CP-00806-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of a PCR motion seeking relief from partial revocation of suspended sentence, holding that the circuit court did not err in summarily dismissing the claim.
(10-0: Emfinger for the court)

McGilberry v. SVP Sewing Brands, LLC, 2025-CA-00904-COA (Civil – Other Torts)
Affirming the Circuit Court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing a product liability case, holding that the plaintiff did not come forward with evidence to prove causation.
(10-0: Emfinger for the court)

Practice Point – This is not something you want to read:

Winton v. Dean, 2024-CA-01326-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the Chancellor’s property division decision, holding that the chancellor did not err in the methodology or calculation with respect to the application of COLA to one side’s PERS benefits.
(7-3-0: Westbrooks for the court; Carlton, Wilson, and Emfinger concurred in result only without writing)

Thompson v. State, 2024-KA-01296-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first degree murder, holding that the defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause were not violated because the statement at issue was made during an emergency and was non-testimonial in nature and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a stand your ground jury instruction.
(7-2-1: Weddle for the court; Carlton, Wilson, and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald)

Other Orders

  • Stallworth v. State, 2026- TS-00431-COA (suspending the deadline to appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of August 6, 2026

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down seven decisions yesterday. It was an eventful day with three med mal cases (one under the MTCA), a real property case, two direct criminal appeals (one death penalty case), and a public employment termination case. Of these seven cases, there were four reversals including two on cert. There is a noteworthy special concurrence in the MTCA case that garnered a majority of the votes which, in that case, was four out of six participating votes. I would be remiss if I did not also note the appearance of a concurrence dubitante.

Johnson v. Cleveland, 2023-CT-01011-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the Court of Appeals and reinstating the judgment of the circuit court on cert, holding that the plaintiff has standing to assert her adverse possession claim.
(4-1-2: Coleman for the Court; Randolph concurred dubitante; Brannning dissented, joined by Griffis; Wilson did not participate)

Upchurch v. Lewis, 2023-CT-01296-SCT, consolidated with Lewis v. Upchurch, No. 2024-CT-00396-SCT (Civil – Med Mal)
Reversing the Court of Appeals and reinstating the judgment of the circuit court on cert, holding that there was sufficient evidence presented to support the jury’s verdict in favor of the defendants and that the circuit court therefore did not err in denying the motion for JNOV and new trial.
(7-0: Griffis for the Court)

University of Mississippi Medical Center v. Carter, 2024-IA-00038-SCT (Civil – Med Mal)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of a motion for summary judgment based on the MTCA statute of limitations on interlocutory appeal, holding that the statute of limitations was not tolled by the discovery rule.
(5-4*-0: Branning for the court; *Coleman specially concurred, joined by Ishee, Griffis, and Branning; Randolph and Wilson did not participate)

Practice Point – Coleman’s special concurrence garnered the support of three fellow justices giving it a total of four votes. With the addition of Judge Celeste Embry Wilson to the Court, we are now up to are eight justices. But neither Justice Wilson nor Chief Justice Randolph participated in this case. That means that the special concurrence received four of the six votes in the case. In other words, a majority. Here is the conclusion of the special concurrence.

The special concurrence did not say it did overrule Barnes and Caves and hold that there is no discovery rule under the MTCA, but that it would. Justice King and Justice Sullivan did not join the special concurrence. It looks like all it would take in the next case is Chief Justice Randolph, newly appointed Justice Wilson, or the yet-to-be-appointed ninth justice to get on board with the special concurrence’s position to bring that change to fruition.

Brown v. Davey-Sullivan, 2024-CA-00693-SCT (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit courts grant of summary judgment in a medical malpractice case, holding that the plaintiff failed to produce the required expert testimony to establish a triable claim.
(6-1: Griffis for the Court; Coleman dissented; Wilson did not participate)

Heard v. State, 2024-DP-00802-SCT (Criminal – Death Penalty – Direct Appeal)
Affirming capital-murder conviction and death sentence, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error by admitting certain testimony, that the ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be denied without prejudice; that the trial court did not err by allowing a lay witness to give certain opinions; that the trial court did not err in excluding a character witness’s opinion testimony about the defendant’s truthfulness; that the trial court did not err by failing to make a reliability determination about testimony regarding a software program used to extract information from cell phones; that the sentence was not constitutionally disproportionate; that the trial court did not err by giving a sentencing instruction regarding heinous atrocious, or cruel aggravating circumstances because it was supported by sufficient evidence; that the death sentence was not unconstitutional, cruel, and unusual punishment; and that section 99-19-105(3) is not applicable.
(7-0: Griffis for the Court; Wilson did not participate)

Coahoma County School District Board of Education v. Moore, 2024-IA-01316-SCT (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Reversing the county court’s denial of summary judgment for the school board, holding that the plaintiff’s claims for unpaid compensation under theories of quantum meruit and unjust enrichment were foreclosed by the minutes rule.
(6-1: Branning for the court; Coleman dissented; Wilson did not participate)

Bozard v. State, 2025-KA-00393-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of felony evasion, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence.
(7-0: Randolph for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Mississippi Bar v. Owens, 2026-BD-00754-SCT (accepting Jody E. Owens’s resignation with prejudice from the Mississippi Bar, and such resignation shall be tantamount to proof of guilt on the matter charged, and ordering that Jody E. Owens II is hereby immediately and permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Mississippi)
  • In Re: The Mississippi Access to Justice Commission,   89-R-99032-SCT (appointing or reappointing the following Commissioners of the Mississippi Access to Justice Commission for terms ending on June 30, 2029: Justice Leslie King; Mary Purvis; Judge Richard “Wes” Ryals, II; Catherine Servati; Patrick Bryan; Chancellor E. Vincent Davis; and Representative Justis Gibbs, and thanking the following outgoing Commissioners for their dedicated service: David Calder; Dan Hall; and Judge Denise Owens.)
  • Gray v. State, 2023-CT-01270-SCT (denying cert)
  • Williams v. State, 2024-CT-00257-SCT (denying cert)
  • Brown v. State, 2024-CT-00489-SCT (denying cert)
  • White v. State, 2024-CT-00658-SCT (denying cert)
  • Norman v. State, 2024-CT-01107-SCT (Denying cert)
  • Winn v. State, 2024-CT-01280-SCT (denying cert)
  • In The Matter Of: The Application of Mollie Parsons Sells for Recognition Under The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. Sec. 4025a, 2025-M-00821 (granting Petition for Limited Order Authorizing the Board of Bar Admissions to Grant Application for Admission to Practice Law Under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. § 4025a)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 4, 2026

(The title has been corrected. This is not a post from the future. We regret the error.)

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions today. There are two of direct criminal appeals, a real property case with a punitive damages issue, a PCR case, and an public employment termination case. That last one turned on procedural issues related to the appeal to chancery court.

(Photo from my morning in court in Lincoln County, Mississippi)

Griste v. State, 2024-KA-01423-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion for directed verdict, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the state’s motion in limine to exclude evidence of other bad acts of the victim, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in instructing the jury.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Snowden v. State, 2025-CA-00064-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the denial of a PCR motion, holding that it was barred by the statute of limitations and no statutory exceptions applied.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Richardson v. Jackson Public School District, 2025-CA-00695-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision upholding the school board’s decision to terminate employment, holding that remand was required because the record filed on appeal with the chancery court was not a complete record and therefore did not comply with the statutory requirements for a review in the Chancery Court.
(6-3-0: Lawrence for the court; Lassitter St. Pe’, specially concurred, joined by McCarty; Wilson and McCarty concurred and pardoned in the result without writing; McDonald did not participate)

Ocean Blue Land & Timber Co., LLC v. Marsolais, 2024-CA-00154-COA (Civil – Report Property)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the Chancellor’s ruling in a case alleging that real property was fraudulently obtained, affirming the Chancellor’s finding of a fraud but reversing the punitive damages award against the individual and rendering judgment on that issue.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Collins v. State, 2024-KA-01333-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err by denying a directed verdict of acquittal under the Weathersby rule because the rule did not apply and declining to address the ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal.
(6-1-3: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court; McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing. Emfinger dissented, joined by Barnes and McCarty)

Other Orders

  • Taylor v. State, 2024-KA-00280-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Bridgman v. SBC Internet Services, Inc., 2024-WC-01199-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Vanaman v. American Pride Properties, LLC, 2024-CA-01434-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Ryland v Regions Bank, 2025-CP-00178-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 28, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down twelve opinions yesterday. One of my cases was in the mix which always derails my focus for the day. That is my excuse for the delay. Among the opinions are several direct criminal appeals, a workers’ comp case, a premises liability case, and two dismissals for lack of appellate jurisdiction. My case survived a jurisdictional challenge and then turned on whether the chancery court erred in deciding that a probated claim stemming from a divorce judgment was satisfied.

Greater New Hamilton Grove Baptist Church v. Hamilton Grove Missionary Baptist Church, 2025-CA-01008-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Dismissing the appeal of an order dissolving a preliminary injunction in an interment dispute, holding that the issue was moot and the court was without jurisdiction.
(10-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)

Ajinomoto Foods North America v. Christy Moore, 2025-WC-01107-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s decision, finding that the claimant suffered a total occupational loss of use in both hands and work-related osteoarthritis and awarding permanent total disability benefits, holding that the commission did not err in applying the Jensen presumption and that its decision that the osteoarthritis was compensable was based on substantial credible evidence.
(10-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)

Wilson v. State, 2024-KA-00725-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of felonious child abuse, holding that the issue of whether cross-examination was limited in violation of the defendant’s due process rights was procedurally barred, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in precluding certain testimony, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion denying a motion for mistrial after the State defied instructions not to introduce youth court rulings, that argument regarding the trial court not precluding evidence about false confessions was procedurally barred and without merit, that the trial court does not abuse its discretion in instructing the jury, that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, and that the cumulative error doctrine did not apply.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Walley v. State, 2024-KA-01443-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of uttering forgery and identity theft, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in prohibiting the introduction of some evidence and limiting cross-examination about a prior indictment.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

C.D.M. v. Lee County Dept. of Child Protection Services, 2024-CP-01427-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the youth court’s decision terminating parental rights, holding that the youth court’s decision was based on sufficient evidence. (9-1-0: Wilson for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Gallion v. State, 2025-KA-00061-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that the trial court properly sustained an objection to prosecutorial misconduct and that further arguments on that issue were waived for failure to request a contemporary jury instruction or to move for mistrial, that a hearsay objection should have been sustained but was harmless error, those arguments regarding police officer opinion testimony was waived, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting photographs of the victim, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and that it was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Brown v. State, 2024-KA-01376-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of murder and being a felon in possession of a firearm, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a Batson challenge or in denying a motion to sever the two counts.
(8-1-1: Carlton for the Court; McCarty concurred and result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Strawn v. Southern Roots Salon & Day Spa, LLC, 2025-CA-00429-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant in the premises liability case, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the plaintiff failed to present evidence that the defendant created a dangerous condition or had actual or constructive knowledge of it.
(8-2-0: Carlton for the court; Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in result without writing)

Garfield v. Tate, 2025-CA-00104-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Dismissing the appeal of the entry of a chancery court’s final judgment disinheriting a party in a wrongful death case, holding that it was not an order, much less a final appealable order that would confer jurisdiction on the Court of Appeals.
(10-0: Barnes for the court)

Wilson v. State, 2024-CA-00686-COA (Civil-PCR)
Vacating and remanding the denial of a PCR motion, holding that the indictment was void for failure to charge the defendant with crimes cognizable under Mississippi law.
(4-3-3: Barnes for the court; Wilson specially concurred, joined by Emfinger and Weddle, and joined in part by Lawrence and Lassitter St. Pe’; McCarty concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Carlton and Lassitter St. Pe’ and joined in part by Lawrence)

Jones Family Medicine Clinic, PLLC, v. McCallum, 2024-CA-01332-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision affirming the county court’s grant of summary judgment in a breach of contract case, holding that it was error to dismiss the complaint based on the waived affirmative defense of unconscionability.
(6-1-3: Weddle for the court; Westbrooks concurred in part in the result without writing; McDonald dissented without writing; Lawrence dissented, joined by Barnes and McDonald and joined in part by Westbrooks)

In the Matter of the Estate of Pace: Pace v. Philips, 2025-CA-00223-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the chancery court’s finding that a probated claim arising from the decedent’s violation of property settlement agreement incorporated into a judgment of divorce had been satisfied, holding that the final disposition of a probated claim was a final appealable order notwithstanding ongoing litigation in the estate matter and that the chancellor failed to grant a proper remedy for the violation of the PSA/judgment of divorce.
(8-2: McCarty for the court; Barnes dissented, joined by Carlton)

Disclosure: I represented the appellant in this case.

Other Orders

  • Leggett v. State, 2024-CP-01214-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Howard v. State, 2025-KA-00171-COA (recalling mandate and allowing the appellant’s pro se motion for rehearing to proceed as timely filed)
  • Morris v. State, 2026- TS-00276-COA (denying appellant’s pro se motion to reconsider dismissal of his untimely appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of June 11, 2026

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down five unanimous opinions today with three (3) reversals. The headliner is Lynn Fitch versus Shad White over whether the AG has sole authority to manage litigation and prosecute suits to recover money on behalf of the state.

Smith v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, 2025-CA-00166-SCT (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a motion to intervene in a wrongful death lawsuit, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying the motion as untimely.
(7-0: Griffis for the Court)

Rig Masters, Inc. v. Colenberg, 2024-IA-00506-SCT (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of summary judgment on interlocutory appeal on a negligent entrustment claim, holding that there was no evidence that the title-holder knew or should have known about the driver’s alleged substance abuse problems.
(7-0: Ishee for the Court)

Millette v. Burger, 2024-IA-01152-SCT (Civil – Other)
Reversing the order of a specially-appointed judge who was not assigned to this case granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend, holding that without an order of reassignment the specially-appointed judge had no authority in the case.
(5-0: Griffis for the Court)

Fitch v. White, 2024-CA-01389-SCT (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing the chancery court’s summary judgment, holding that the attorney general possesses authority to prosecute and manage litigation seeking the recovery of state money under sections 7-5-1 and 7-7-211(g) and that the state auditor lacked such authority.
(7-0: Branning for the Court)

Ashford v. Belcher, 2025-CA-00569-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision confirming title, holding that permission given by the landowner to another precluded the other from adversely possessing the property.
(7-0: Coleman for the Court)

Other Orders

  • In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (amending MRCP 4 and 81)
  • CNRS&Z Inc. v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, 2024-CT-00365-SCT (denying cert)
  • Shelton v. State, 2024-CT-00435-SCT (denying cert)
  • Carter v. State, 2024-CT-01328-SCT (dismissing cert petition as untimely)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 31, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals closed out the month with eleven opinions yesterday. The decisions cover felonies, workers’ comp, real property, termination of parental rights, domestic abuse protection order, heirship, foreclosure/service of process, rezoning , and PCR.

Muhammad v. State, 2024-KA-00440-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of one count of aggravated domestic violence, holding that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of prior bad acts and that the defendant was prejudiced by the ruling.
(8-1-1: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court; Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without writing; Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Braxton v. State, 2025-CP-00051-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the arguments were waived by pleading guilty.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Morris v. State, 2024-CP-00580-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the summary denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a preliminary hearing and that the substantive arguments were without merit.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Jones v. Brown, 2025-CA-00031-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision on a petition to determine heirs, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the putative heir did not prove heirship by clear and convincing evidence.
(6-4-0: Emfinger for the Court; McCarty and Weddle concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Sievers v. Faucheaux-Sievers, 2024-CA-01112-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision issuing a new domestic abuse protection order, holding that the chancellor did not abuse her discretion in entering a final protection order and that the defendant was not entitled to a voluntary dismissal.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson concurred in result only without writing)

Armstrong v. State, 2024-KA-01217-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two drug charges, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress evidence found pursuant to two search warrants.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

J.R.M. v. Warren County Dept. of CPS, 2024-CA-00984-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the youth court’s termination of parental rights, holding that there was sufficient evidence to support the youth court’s finding that the father failed to exercise reasonable visitation.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Smith v. Dennis Wright & Son Plumbing, 2025-WC-00046-COA (Civil – Workers’ Compensation)
Affirming the Commission’s decision, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that the claimant did not sustain a compensable left shoulder injury.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Note/Disclosure – I handled this appeal for the Employer/Carrier.

Taylor v. State, 2024-KA-00280-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of sexual battery and one count of gratification of lust against a minor, holding that the arguments that the indictment was defective for overbreadth and vagueness were waived and without merit, that arguments that hearsay testimony was not properly admitted for lack of a proper tender-years hearing were waived and without merit, and that arguments that the State improperly bolstered testimony was waived for lack of objection.
(9-1-0: Barnes for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

OneWest Bank, FSB v. Brown-Wood, 2024-CA-01125-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a foreclosure matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in granting a motion to set aside a prior order granting an extension of time to serve process, denying a motion for leave to amend, or in dismissing a complaint for judicial foreclosure.
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Feather v. City of Saltillo, 2024-CA-00831-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision to affirm the City’s approval of a rezoning application, holding that the Board’s decision that a public need existed was “fairly debatable” and would not be disturbed on appeal.
(5-4: Westbrooks for the Court; Emfinger dissented without writing; Wilson dissented, jioned by Carlton, McCarty, and Emfinger; Weddle did not participate)

Other Orders

  • J.T.S. v. M.L.S., 2024-CA-00023-COA (denying rehearing)
  • CNRS&Z Inc., v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, 2024-CA-00365-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Shelton v. State, 2024-CA-00435-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Chavers v. State, 2024-KA-00551-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Estate of Dorsey v. Matory, 2024-CA-00925-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Rasbeery v. State, 2024-KA-01005-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 12 and March 19, 2026

I am a bit behind because I was out of the office last week, and yesterday I had court in Neshoba County. The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion last week and six opinions this week. Last week’s opinion was an election context. Of the six this week, three were dismissals of appeals from youth court restitution orders, two were appeals of felony convictions (with one reversal) and the other was a real property case.

March 12, 2026

Randle v. Ivy, 2025-EC-00299-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Affirming the special judge’s decision in an election contest, holding that the issue was moot after the election and that there was substantial evidence to support the decision that the primary-election candidate did not meet the residency requirement.
(7-0: King for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Arbor Landing Homeowners’ Association, Inc. v. Rankin County Development Group, LLC, 2025-IA-01286-SCT (granting interlocutory appeal)

Hand Down Page

March 19, 2026

In Re: Interest of L.L., A Minor, 2024-CA-00872-SCT (Civil – Juvenile Justice)
Dismissing appeal from a youth court restitution order, holding that the order was not a final, appealable order.
(6-1: Branning for the Court; King dissented without writing)

Gibson v. State, 2024-KA-01301-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of second degree murder, holding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a jury instruction for excusable homicide.
(4-3: Sullivan for the Court; Randolph dissented, joined by Griffis and Branning)

In the Interest of R.H., a Minor, 2024-CA-00873-SCT (Civil – Juvenile Justice)
Dismissing an appeal of a restitution order from youth court, holding that it was not a final, appealable order.
(6-1: Griffis for the Court; King dissented without writing)

Hewitt v. TJM Properties, Inc., 2024-CA-01312-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s dismissal of a claim for reimbursement and property-based claims by a developer who never acquired title to the subject property, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the plaintiff lacked a legally cognizable property interest.
(7-0: Ishee for the Court)

McDaniel v. State, 2025-KA-00202-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second degree murder, holding that trial counsel was not ineffective for not requesting an accidental homicide instruction, that there was no abuse of discretion granting jury instruction on deliberate design, and that the conviction was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-0: Randolph for the Court)

In the Interest of D.G., a Minor, 2024-CA-00868-SCT (Civil – Juvenile Justice)
Dismissing an appeal of a youth court restitution order, holding that it was not a final, appealable order.
(6-1: Ishee for the Court; King dissented without writing)

Other Orders

  • Snyder v. Pilger, 2024-CT-00460-SCT (denying cert)
  • The Mississippi Bar v. Newcomb, 2025-BD-00835-SCT (suspending from the practice of law for two years retroactive to Aug. 22, 2022)
  • In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2026-AD-00001-SCT (ordering (1) that the AOC shall be authorized to disclose to the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance information gathered in compliance with 2025 Extraordinary Session House Bill 38, Section 34, as well as any other information pertaining to youth courts that would reasonably lead to the investigation of judicial misconduct and (2) that the Commission shall not disseminate or otherwise disclose any information it receives from AOC pertaining to Youth Courts except as necessary to recommend discipline in accordance with the Rules of the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of October 23 and October 30, 2025

My summaries of last week’s and today’s action from the Mississippi Supreme Court are below.

I will blame my tardiness in part on the fact that last week I had the privilege of presenting a civil case law update at the 2025 Law Clerk and Judicial Staff In-Person and Virtual CLE presented by The Bench-Bar Liaison Committee of the Mississippi Bar. It was a great time of catching-up with friends and presenting on something I am passionate about.

October 23, 2025

  • No Opinions

Other Orders

  • Harris v. Casino Vicksburg, LLC, 2023-CT-00959-SCT (denying cert)
  • Deer v. State, 2024-CT-00019-SCT (denying cert)
  • Hatchett v. State, 2024-CT-00100-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

October 30, 2025

Lakeland Premier Women’s Clinic, PLLC v. Jackson, 2024-IA-00445-SCT (Civil – Medical Malpractice)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of a clinic and doctor’s motion for summary judgment in a med mal case on interlocutory appeal, holding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and granting the plaintiff additional time to obtain an expert affidavit where the plaintiff filed a response to the motion for summary judgment on the day of the hearing without supporting medical affidavit or testimony.
(9-0: Branning for the Court)

Practice Point – The Court drew a distinction between the rule 56(c) which allows affidavits opposing an MSJ to be served as late as the day before the hearing and the uniform rule requiring a response to be filed within 10 days.

Jones v. State, 2024-KA-01356-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted aggravated-assault, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence where evidence showed that the defendant pointed a gun at his neighbor before firing it.
(9-0: Maxwell for the Court)

Elliott Land Developments, LLC v. Board of Supervisors of Jackson County, Mississippi, 2024-CA-01249-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the circuit court’s affirmance the board of supervisors’ denial of a rezoning application, holding that the board had jurisdiction, that whether the developer met its burden was a fairly debatable issue based on substantial evidence presented by each side, and that the board’s denial was not arbitrary or capricious.
(9-0: Coleman for the Court)

Chung v. State, 2023-CT-00362-SCT (Civil – Other)
Reversing the Court of Appeals and reinstating the trial court’s judgment, holding that sufficient evidence supported the trial court’s decision finding that the State met its burden of proof required in civil-forfeiture proceedings.
(5-4: Branning for the Court; Sullivan dissented, joined by King, Coleman, and Ishee)

Note – A 5-4 Court of Appeals reversed the trial court and a 5-4 Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals.

Other Orders

  • 1st Step Sober Living LLC v. Cleveland, 2023-CT-00665-SCT (denying cert)
  • In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2025-AD-00001-SCT (directing the disbursement of $189,619.03, in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 18, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today and one bonus opinion Thursday of last week. There are a few real property cases including a restrictive covenants case. There are two interesting speedy trial cases among several other direct criminal appeals.

February 13, 2025

Johnson v. Cleveland, 2023-CA-01011-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision in a tax sale and forfeited tax land patents, holding that a potential adverse possession claim did not confer standing, that the plaintiff lacked standing per section 29-1-21, and that the chancellor erred in declaring the tax sale void and ordering that the forfeited tax land patents be cancelled.
(6-4: Westbrooks dissented, joined by Barnes, McDonald, and Lawrence)

February 18, 2025

Wallace v. State, 2023-KA-00721-COA consolidated with 2023-KA-00723-COA, consolidated with 2023-KA-00888-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of three brothers who were tried together of capital murder, holding that the convictions were supported by sufficient evidence, that the trial court’s decision to allow an investigator to testify about a witness’s prior statement was harmless error, that the trial court did not in error for allowing testimony of prior bad acts to which there was no timely objection, that there was no violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial under the totality of the circumstances, and that one brother’s ineffective assistance of counsel argument was without merit.
(7-3-0: Lawrence and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Note – The speedy trial discussion is worth reading if that is in your wheelhouse.

1st Step Sober Living LLC v. Cleveland, 2023-CA-00665-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision granting residents’ request for injunctive relief preventing a home in a subdivision from being used by individuals recovering from substance abuse disorder, holding that the sale of the subject property did not render the case moot because damages were sought, that the proposed use was a commercial endeavor that was prohibited by restrictive covenants, and the chancellor did not err in determining that the rehab home did not sufficiently prove that the tenants would fit the “handicap” criteria for FHA purposes.
(10-0)

Brooks v. State, 2023-KA-01081-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance and being a felon in possession of a firearm, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support both convictions.
(10-0)

Chambers v. State, 2023-KA-00626-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of capital murder and two counts of felonious child abuse, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress her statement to investigators where she voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived her Miranda rights and that the State presented sufficient evidence for all convictions.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

LoanMax, LLC v. Castle Columbus I, LLC, 2023-CA-00790-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancery court’s rulings in a claim for declaratory and injunctive relief involving a commercial lease renewal, holding on direct appeal that the chancellor did not err in finding that lessee did not provide notice required to effectively renew the lease, on cross-appeal that the chancellor did not err in finding that the owner is not entitled to damages for roofing or HVAC or to attorney’s fees, and on cross-appeal that the chancellor erred in her findings on holdover rent and remanded for a determination of what back rent may be owed.
(9-0: Barnes did not participate)

Taylor v. State, 2023-KA-00245-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, holding that the defendant’s right to speedy trial was not violated.
(7-4*-0: McCarty specially concurred, joined by McDonald and St. Pe (who also joined the majority); Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Note – The constitutional right to speedy trial got a lot of air time today. Here is how McCarty’s special concurrence on the subject kicks off:

Spearman v. State, 2023-KA-01091-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that there were no arguable issues for appeal after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(10-0)

Fears v. State, 2023-KA-00174-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, armed robbery, conspiracy to commit armed robbery, and aggravated assault against victims responding to a fake Facebook Marketplace ad, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying an accomplice jury instruction.
(10-0)

Johnson v. State, 2023-KA-00369-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of capital murder and felony child abuse, holding that the defendant abandoned his motion to server the counts against him when he failed to pursue a motion to hearing a decision and, further, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion denying the motion to sever.
(10-0)

Other Orders

  • Johnson v. SW Gaming, LLC, 2023-CA-00505-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Simmons v. State, 2023-KA-00518-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page – February 18, 2025

Hand Down Page – February 13, 2025

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 28, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions yesterday and a stray opinion on Thursday of last week. Three are direct criminal appeals, one is a breach of contract/real property case, and the other is a PCR case.

Childs v. State, 2023-CA-00126-COA, consolidated with 2018-CT-00263-COA and 2011-CT-00263-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a motion for PCR, holding that it did not have subject matter over the venue claim, that there was no clear error in denying the Brady claim, and that the claimant failed to establish a claim of ineffective assistance.
(9-0: McCarty did not participate)

JLS Farm Partnership v. ’27 Break Hunting Club, Inc., 2023-CA-00434-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of hunting clubs in a suit filed against them by an adjacent farming partnership after the partnership’s deer depredation permit was revoked and the clubs opposed a new permit, holding that the trial court did not err in finding no evidence to support the partnership’s claims of breach of contract, tortious breach of contract, breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, and promissory estoppel.
(9-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Haynes v. State, 2023-KA-00861-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of manslaughter, holding that the trial court erred by denying a stand-your-ground instruction but also holding that the State presented sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.
(9-1-0: Carlton concurred in result only without writing)

Adame v. State, 2023-KA-00758-COA (Criminal – Felony)
affirming conviction of fondling, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by giving a jury instruction concerning uncorroborated testimony of a sex-crime victim.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Note – Here is the jury instruction that passed muster:

Bonus decision from January 23, 2025

Culbertson v. State, 2023-KA-00588-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of aggravated domestic violence as a violent habitual offender, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing a lesser-included offense instruction for each count, in denying a motion to exclude evidence of the defendant’s prior bad acts, or in sentencing him as a habitual offender, and that trial counsel was not ineffective for not submitting a lesser-included instruction that was not warranted.
(5-5: Barnes concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Wilson, Westbrooks, McDonald, and Emfinger)

Other Orders

  • Mazie v. Boozier-Mazie, 2023-CA-00470-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Walker v. State, 2023-CP-00787-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page – Jan. 28, 2025

Hand Down Page – Jan. 23, 2025