Termination of Parental Rights – Mississippi Appeals Blog

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 31, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals closed out the month with eleven opinions yesterday. The decisions cover felonies, workers’ comp, real property, termination of parental rights, domestic abuse protection order, heirship, foreclosure/service of process, rezoning , and PCR.

Muhammad v. State, 2024-KA-00440-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of one count of aggravated domestic violence, holding that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of prior bad acts and that the defendant was prejudiced by the ruling.
(8-1-1: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court; Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without writing; Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Braxton v. State, 2025-CP-00051-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the arguments were waived by pleading guilty.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Morris v. State, 2024-CP-00580-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the summary denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a preliminary hearing and that the substantive arguments were without merit.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Jones v. Brown, 2025-CA-00031-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision on a petition to determine heirs, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the putative heir did not prove heirship by clear and convincing evidence.
(6-4-0: Emfinger for the Court; McCarty and Weddle concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Sievers v. Faucheaux-Sievers, 2024-CA-01112-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision issuing a new domestic abuse protection order, holding that the chancellor did not abuse her discretion in entering a final protection order and that the defendant was not entitled to a voluntary dismissal.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson concurred in result only without writing)

Armstrong v. State, 2024-KA-01217-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two drug charges, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress evidence found pursuant to two search warrants.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

J.R.M. v. Warren County Dept. of CPS, 2024-CA-00984-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the youth court’s termination of parental rights, holding that there was sufficient evidence to support the youth court’s finding that the father failed to exercise reasonable visitation.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Smith v. Dennis Wright & Son Plumbing, 2025-WC-00046-COA (Civil – Workers’ Compensation)
Affirming the Commission’s decision, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that the claimant did not sustain a compensable left shoulder injury.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Note/Disclosure – I handled this appeal for the Employer/Carrier.

Taylor v. State, 2024-KA-00280-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of sexual battery and one count of gratification of lust against a minor, holding that the arguments that the indictment was defective for overbreadth and vagueness were waived and without merit, that arguments that hearsay testimony was not properly admitted for lack of a proper tender-years hearing were waived and without merit, and that arguments that the State improperly bolstered testimony was waived for lack of objection.
(9-1-0: Barnes for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

OneWest Bank, FSB v. Brown-Wood, 2024-CA-01125-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a foreclosure matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in granting a motion to set aside a prior order granting an extension of time to serve process, denying a motion for leave to amend, or in dismissing a complaint for judicial foreclosure.
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Feather v. City of Saltillo, 2024-CA -00831-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision to affirm the City’s approval of a rezoning application, holding that the Board’s decision that a public need existed was “fairly debatable” and would not be disturbed on appeal.
(5-4: Westbrooks for the Court; Emfinger dissented without writing; Wilson dissented, jioned by Carlton, McCarty, and Emfinger; Weddle did not participate)

Other Orders

J.T.S. v. M.L.S., 2024-CA-00023-COA (denying rehearing)
CNRS&Z Inc., v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, 2024-CA-00365-COA (denying rehearing)
Shelton v. State, 2024-CA-00435-COA (denying rehearing)
Chavers v. State, 2024-KA-00551-COA (denying rehearing)
Estate of Dorsey v. Matory, 2024-CA-00925-COA (denying rehearing)
Rasbeery v. State, 2024-KA-01005-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 3, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. The Court covered a lot of ground, including termination of parental rights, partition of real property, UM coverage, unemployment benefits, and direct criminal appeals.

James W. v. Jackson County Dept. of Miss. Dept. of Child Protective Services, 2024-CP-00420-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the youth court’s judgment terminating parental rights, holding that the youth court judge did not err in denying a motion to recuse, that the decision was based on clear and convincing evidence, and that the youth court did not abuse its discretion admitting evidence.
(9-0: Weddle for the Court; Lawrence did not participate)

Breland v. State, 2024-KA-01022-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and leaving the scene of an accident, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and that there was no merit to the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.
(9-1-0: Weddle for the Court; Wesbtrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Parker v. United Services Automobile Association, 2024-CA-01419-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming judgment denying a motion for declaratory judgment regarding entitlement to uninsured motorist benefits, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the plaintiff’s motorcycle going over an oily substance and crashing did not constitute “physical contact” under the policy.
(9-1-0: Weddle for the Court; McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Willis v. State, 2024-KA-01203-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of three counts of possession of drugs and one count of trafficking, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion instructing the jury when the instructions were read as a whole or in denying a motion for new trial based on the doctrine of retroactive misjoinder, and holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Winn v. State, 2024-KA-01280-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conspiracy charge and that there was no merit to the claim that trial counsel was ineffective.
(8-2-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence concurred in result only without writing)

Dupree v. Mississippi Department of Employment Security, 2025-CC-00144-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision affirming an MDES decision denying unemployment benefits after the petitioner was terminated for testing positive for THC, holding that there was not sufficient evidence that the petitioner violated the City’s drug policy.
(6-1-3: Westbrooks for the Court; Emfinger concurred in result only without writing; Carlton dissented, joined by Barnes, and Lassitter St. Pe’)

Sloke v. Pierce, 2025-CA-00121-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the chancellor’s partition decision, holding that since the parties agreed that the final judgment erroneously attached an improper property description.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Oates v. State, 2024-KA-00267-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that the State produced sufficient evidnece of the defendant’s sanity at the time of the murder, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a gruesome autopsy photo.
(6-4: Weddle for the Court; Lassitter St. Pe’ concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty and joined in part my McDonald; Westbrooks and McDonald dissented without writing)

Other Orders

Bumgardner v. State, 2024-KA-00090-COA (denying rehearing)
Ward v. State, 2024-KA-00341-COA (denying rehearing)
Carroll v. State, 2024-KA-00481-COA (denying rehearing)
Fields v. State, 2024-KA-00807-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of August 14, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions yesterday. I can report that the “minutes rule” is alive and well and is not to be trifled with.

But before we jump into summaries, I should acknowledge that the biggest appellate news in Mississippi this week is the appointments of Justice Maxwell and Justice Chamberlin to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi. If they are confirmed, that will create two vacancies in the Supreme Court District 3. That district is comprised of Alcorn, Attala, Benton, Calhoun, Carroll, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Clay, Coahoma, Desoto, Grenada, Itawamba, Lafayette, Lee, Leflore, Lowndes, Marshall, Monroe, Montgomery, Oktibbeha, Panola, Pontotoc, Prentiss, Quitman, Tallahatchie, Tate, Tippah, Tishomingo, Tunica, Union, Webster, Winston, and Yalobusha Counties.

Since two new justices (Branning and Sullivan) joined the Mississippi Supreme Court this year, we could have four justices joining the nine-justice court within a year. This has court-reshaping potential and will be an interesting process to watch.

K.S. v. M.D., 2023-CA-01118-SCT, consolidated with No. 2024-CA-00707-SCT (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision terminating parental rights and denying a Rule 60(b) motion to set aside adoption, holding that the chancellor had jurisdiction to terminate parental rights and that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in terminating parental rights, and that as a result the adoption did not have to be vacated for lack of jurisdiction.
(9-0: Ishee for the Court)

The Mississippi State Port Authority at Gulfport v. Yilport Holding A.S., 2024-IA-00140-SCT, consolidated with No. 2024-IA-00149-SCT (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the circuit court’s rulings in a case following failed negotiations after a letter of intent was signed concerning a port expansion, holding that the trial court did not err in applying the “minutes rule” and finding that the LOI was not properly spread upon the minutes of the board and was therefore unenforceable, that estoppel did not apply, that the circuit court did err in allowing the unjust enrichment claim to go forward, and that the trial court did not err in denying summary judgment on the misappropriation-of-trade-secrets claim under the MTCA.
(9-0: King for the Court)

Sardin v. State, 2024-KA-00319-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of trafficking a controlled substance, holding that there were no arguable issues after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(9-0: Randolph for the Court)

Other Orders

In Re: the Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (granting motion to amend M.R.C.P. 3)
In Re: Commission on Continuing Legal Education, 89-R-99011-SCT (appointing Helen Morris, Amanda B. Seymour, and Katherine K. Farese to three-year terms as members of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education)
Frazier v. State, 2016-M-01363 (denying motion for reconsideration of denial of motion to recuse)
Armistad v. State, 2023-CT-00799-SCT (denying cert)
Young v. Martin, 2023-CT-00980-SCT (denying cert)
Doby v. South Park Village Apartments, 2023-CA-01095-SCT (denying rehearing)
Phillips v. State, 2023-KA-01218-SCT (denying cert)
Tucker v. State, 2024-KA-00255-SCT (dismissing appeal as moot)
Mississippi Methodist Hospital & Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Mississippi Department of Health, 2925-SA-01113-SCT (denying motion to award costs and attorneys’ fees)
Rogers v. The Mississippi Bar, 2025-BD-00833-SCT (accepting irrevocable resignation as a member of the Mississippi Bar, tendered under Rule 11(a) of the Rules of Discipline for the Mississippi Bar)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 15, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down two decisions today. One is a youth court permanency plan case and the other is an appeal of a dismissal and judgment of acquittal.

In the Interest of J.S., a Minor, and I.S., a Minor: P.S. v. Pearl River County Department of Child Protection Services, 2023-CA-00932-COA (Civil – Custody)
Reversing the youth court’s order modifying permanency plan from reunification to adoption and ordering CPS to begin termination of parental rights proceedings, holding that the record did not reflect substantial credible evidence to support the finding that CPS made reasonable efforts over a reasonable period of time to diligently assist the mother in complying with the service plan.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

State v. Mitchell, 2023-KA-00771-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing the circuit court’s order granting motion to dismiss and judgment of acquittal, holding that it had appellate jurisdiction under section 99-35-103(a) and that the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process was not violated where the alleged victim was a resident of Tennessee and the Tennessee probate court denied the defendant’s effort to compel the alleged victim to testify.
(5-4: Emfinger for the Court; Barnes dissented, joined by Carlton, Westbrooks, and McDonald; Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald; Weddle did not participate)

Other Orders

Chambers v. State, 2023-KA-00626-COA (denying rehearing)
Star v. State, 2023-KA-00788-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 23, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two decisions today. One in an interlocutory appeal of a denial of a motion to dismiss a 1983/HIPAA suit against a hospital and the other is a termination of parental right case.

Greenwood Leflore Hospital v. Boykin, 2023-IA-00820-SCT (Civil – Other)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of the hospital’s motion to dismiss a § 1983 suit alleging that the hospital intentionally withheld the plaintiff’s medical records which in turn deprived her of access to courts by preventing her from filing a med mal suit, holding that the plaintiff’s failure to file a brief constituted a confession of reversible error and then addressing the merits and holding that the plaintiff could not use § 1983 to enforce a federal statute (HIPAA) that does not give her an individual right.
(7-2-0: Coleman concurred in part and in the result; Randolph concurred in result only)

Practice Point – File a brief.

Note – Justice Coleman’s short concurrence took issue with the Court’s decision to address the merits after finding that the failure to file a brief constituted confession of reversible error. I thought this concurrence was interesting in light of appellate courts’ occasional habit of deciding that arguments “also meritless” after deciding dispositive issues that do not reach the merits such as an argument is waived or time-barred. Here is the concurrence:

X.G.C. v. Jackson County Department of Child Protection Services, 2023-CA-00138-SCT (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision terminating parental rights, holding that the court did not err in terminating parental rights and that the record supported the Court’s finding that the statutory requirements of § 93-15-115 and § 93-14-119 were satisfied.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Black v. State, 2022-CT-01223-SCT (denying cert)
Sinquefield v. City of Ridgeland, 2022-CT-01276-SCT (denying cert)
Carr v. State, 2023-DR-00503-SCT (staying matter until April 16, 2025, to allow the State to return to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi and move to lift the stay and for any other appropriate relief)
Haley v. Brewer, 2023-CT-00571-SCT (denying cert)
McGee v. McGee, 2023-CA-00695-SCT (denying rehearing)
In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2025-AD-00001-SCT (directing the disbursement of $213,407.18 in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 16, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One is a termination of parental rights decision and the other a judicial performance case against Carlos Moore.

J.J.B. v. Monroe County Department of Child Protective Services, 2023-CA-00532-SCT (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a custody matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in terminating the mother’s parental rights where even after CPS took the children into custody the mother failed to comply with a service plan for reunification and an agreed court order.
(9-0)

Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Moore, 2024-JP-00121-SCT (Civil – Judicial Performance)
Finding that a municipal court judge’s social media posts and public comments violated the Mississippi Constitution, the canons of judicial conduct, and a memorandum of understanding between the Commission and the judge, resulting in removal from the bench and a $3,000 fine.
(8-1: King dissented, arguing that the statements at issue were protected by the First Amendment)

NOTE – Here are the two allegations of misconduct at issue. First, comments made on the Kelly Clarkson Show:

Second, a social media commentary on the Kyle Rittenhouse trial:

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 21, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down five opinions on November 21, 2024, while I was out. Here are summaries of those decisions – two custody/parental rights cases, two felony appeals, and a certified question answer regarding the interplay between the MTCA and the MWPA.

Bell v. State, 2023-KA-00801-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that after consideration of counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record that there were no issues warranting appellate review.
(9-0)

S.D.P. v. Harrison County Department of Child Protection Services, 2023-CA-00838-SCT (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the youth court’s judgment terminating parental rights regarding a medically fragile child, holding that the youth court’s decision was based on clear and convincing evidence that the parents were not mentally, morally, or otherwise fit and that reunification was not desirable toward obtaining a satisfactory permanency outcome.
(9-0)

Johnson v. Miller, 2024-FC-00419-SCT (Civil – Federally Certified Question)
Answering a certified question from the Fifth Circuit, holding that the Mississippi Tort Claims Act’s statute of limitations and notice requirements do not apply to the Mississippi Whistleblower Protection Act.
(9-0)

Myers v. State, 2023-KA-01083-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of shooting into a dwelling and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error regarding jury instructions because the instruction on the elements of shooting into a dwelling did not constitute an impermissible constructive amendment to the indictment.
(9-0)

In Re the Adoption of J.J.W.B: J.B. v. M.M., 2023-IA-00457-SCT, consolidated with 2023-IA-00458-SCT (Civil – Custody)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision denying a motion to dismiss a grandmother’s motion to set aside an adoption because the motion to set aside was untimely and no jurisdictional issues were present to set aside the adoption, but affirming the chancellor’s decision that the adoption did not extinguish the grandmother’s visitation rights and properly denied the motion to dismiss the grandmother’s contempt action and remanding for further proceedings to determine post-adoption visitation.
(5-4-0: Coleman concurred in part and in the result without writing; King concurred in part and in the result, joined by Randolph and Kitchens, and joined in part by Coleman and Griffis)

Other Orders

In Re: Rules of Discipline for the Mississippi Bar, 89-R-99010-SCT (appointing or reappointing Alicia S. Hall, Assistant Dean Mary Largent Purvis, District Attorney Angel Myers McIlrath, Municipal Judge Robert Fant Walker, Robert E. Quimby, and Circuit Judge Michelle Easterling to three-year terms)
Bell v. State, 2023-KA-008001-SCT (denying second motion for reappointment of counsel and motion for rebuttal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 4, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. There is a paternity/child support case, a custody/termination of parental rights case, an MTCA personal injury case, a contract case, a slip-and-fall summary judgment, and three direct criminal appeals.

Myles v. Lewis, 2022-CA-01192-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings in a paternity action, holding that the chancellor erred in computing monthly child support by failing to account for the father’s significant income increase and personal withdrawals, inaccuracies in his financial statement, and admitted commingling of personal and business expenses; holding that the chancellor did not err in not requiring the father to pay half of the child’s private school tuition, insurance premiums, and extracurricular fees; and holding that no party was entitled attorney’s fees.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in result without writing)

Lemay v. City of Biloxi, 2023-CA-00469-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the City in an MTCA case stemming from a collision with a police officer, holding that although the trial court incorrectly ruled that the plaintiff was precluded from recovery because she was allegedly speeding, the summary judgment should affirmed because the undisputed evidence showed the officer was engaged in police protection activity and that he did not act with reckless disregard.
(7-2-0: Carlton and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence did not participate)

Hattie T. v. Matthew R., 2022-CP-00926-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s final judgment terminating parental rights, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying the mother’s motion to dismiss and that the chancellor’s decision terminating parental rights was supported by clear and convincing evidence and was in the best interests of the children.
(10-0)

Collins v. State, 2022-KA-01184-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of kidnapping, armed robbery, armed carjacking, aggravated assault, conspiracy to commit kidnapping, and conspiracy to commit armed robbery, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of other acts and crimes coupled with a limiting instruction, in excluding evidence of the defendant’s assault in prison by two witnesses, or in refusing the defendant’s instructions on lesser included instruction.
(7-2-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Terry v. State, 2022-KA-01194-COA, consolidated with Thomas v. State, 2022-KA-01278-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of two defendants (Terry and Thomas) for first-degree murder and drive-by shooting, holding that though the trial court abused its discretion in admitting surveillance video the error was harmless, that Terry’s conviction was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting text messages because they were not hearsay.
(10-0)

Designer Custom Homes, LLC v. U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies, LLC, 2023-CA-00207-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s reversal of the county court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a breach of contract case, holding that the circuit court erred by reversing on an issue and argument that were not raised in the county court or briefed on appeal and erred by finding that there was evidence in the record that presented a genuine issue of material fact.
(10-0)

Practice Point – Don’t rehash your trial court pleadings on appeal:

If the appeal process is daunting or simply pulling you away from other work you would rather do, your friendly neighborhood appellate attorney would love to visit with you about it.

Anderson v. SW Gaming LLC, 2023-CA-00345-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment for the defendant in a slip-and-fall case, holding that there was no evidence that the defendant caused water on the floor in the bathroom or that the defendant had either actual or constructive knowledge that there was water on the floor.
(10-0)

Harrera v. State, 2022-KA-01167-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of kidnapping, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, that the kidnapping instruction did not constructively amend the indictment (an issue that was procedurally barred and without merit), and that the trial court did not err by giving the State’s accomplice liability instruction.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00419-COA (denying rehearing)
Minor v. State, 2022-KA-00990-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of February 1, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One addressed whether a father who relinquished parental rights qualified as a wrongful death beneficiary of the child. The other addressed the status of the “colorable interest standard” for standing analysis. There was also an order granting a petition for reinstatement to the bar.

Gibson v. McNatt, 2023-CA-00007-SCT (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming the chancery court’s finding that a deceased minor’s father who had previously relinquished all parental duties and rights in Texas was not a wrongful death beneficiary under Mississippi law, holding that the chancery court did not abuse its discretion because the Texas termination order was valid and was not subject to collateral attack under Mississippi law.
(9-0)

Pearson v. Eubanks, 2022-CT-00011-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the Court of Appeals that reversed the chancery court’s ruling, holding that the Court of Appeals correctly held that the petitioners had standing, but emphasizing that the Court of Appeals has improperly relied on the “colorable interest standard” that has been abandoned by the Supreme Court.
(8-1-0: King concurred in result only without writing)

Practice Point – The Supreme Court’s short opinion had this to say about the colorable interest standard:

Other Orders

Toolpushers Supply Co. v. Mississippi Department of Revenue, 2021-CT-01186-SCT (granting cert)

Prather v. State, 2021-CT-01416-SCT (denying cert)

Prophet v. State, 2022-CT-00933-SCT (dismissing cert petition)

Jones v. The Mississippi Bar, 2022-BR-01256-SCT (granting petition for reinstatement)

Gibson v. McNatt, 2023-CA-00007-SCT (denying motion to take judicial notice, objections and/or responses to various filings, and motions to strike)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 13, 2023

I was out of town for a wedding anniversary trip on Tuesday, and then I have been playing catch-up at the office to recover from said trip, so my summaries are delayed this week. First up is Tuesday’s offering from Mississippi Court of Appeals. The COA handed down five opinions this week: a termination of parental rights case, an emancipation case, two direct criminal appeals, and an attempted appeal of a MDOC decision.

Rogers v. Kresse, 2021-CA-00914-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming termination of parental rights, holding that the chancery court did not err in finding that the natural mother had abandoned her children and that the father had not abused his discretion with regard to visitation by disallowing it, and that reunification was not in the children’s best interest.
(7-2-0: McDonald concurred in part in and the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Talley v. Talley, 2022-CA-00005-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s judgment in an emancipation proceeding initiated by a father with a counter-petition for contempt for failure to pay filed by the mother, holding that the chancellor did not err by finding that the children were emancipated while not modifying the life insurance provision of the divorce agreement, finding the father in contempt for failing to pay his portion of certain expenses, and awarding the mother attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Barnes did not participate.)

Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00331-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of selling fentanyl and trafficking and possession of controlled substances while possessing a firearm, holding that the circuit court did not err in admitting text messages into evidence on authentication, relevance, or hearsay grounds.
(7-3-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Wallace v. State, 2022-KA-00332-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s request for a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction or by allowing testimony related to injuries the victim suffered a week before her death.
(9-0: Smith did not participate.)

NOTE– I love it when opinions cut to the chase. Introductions like this would just about put me out of business around here:

Knight v. State, 2021-CP-01192-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the appeal of a purported PCR motion was untimely and because it was actually a petition seeking judicial review of an MDOC decision it was a civil appeal for which the Court could not suspend the rules to allow an untimely appeal.
(10-0)

Other Orders

McKenzie v. State, 2012-KA-00471-COA (dismissing untimely motion for rehearing)

Thomas v. State, 2021-CP-00060-COA (denying rehearing)

Pace v. State, 2022-KA-00046-COA (denying rehearing)

Jones v. State, 2023-TS-00325-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)

Bates v. State, 2023-TS-00356-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as timely based on well-taken pro se show-cause response)

Hand Down Page