Contract – Mississippi Appeals Blog

Double Issue: Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of August 13 and August 20, 2026

The Mississippi Supreme Court has handed down seven decisions in the last two weeks. The offerings from August 13 are notable for two election contests with one reversal and Justice Wilson’s first vote in a decision. The marquee case from August 20 was the decision in Carly Gregg’s appeal. The convictions and sentences were upheld notwithstanding errors by the trial court.

August 20, 2026

Carroll Brothers, LLC v. Graham, 2025-CA-00667-SCT (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Department of Revenue, holding that the Department presented sufficient evidence to establish that it provided noticed by mailing assessments to the taxpayers and that the taxpayers failed to overcome the strong presumption that the notice statutes were constitutional.
(7-1: Ishee for the court; Coleman dissenting)

House v. State, 2025-KA-00721-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter and aggravated assault, holding that there is sufficient evidence to support the aggravated assault conviction, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion limiting a defense witness’s testimony where the defendant failed to supplement discovery regarding additional facts from the witness, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion granting and aiding and abetting jury instruction.
(8-0: Coleman for the court)

Gregg v. State, 2024-KA-01178-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of first degree murder, attempted murder, and tampering with evidence and a sentence to life imprisonment and ten years, holding that the trial court’s statement that it does not grant continuances was in friction with controlling precedent vote was not reversible error where no motion for continuance was filed, no adverse ruling, and no specific prejudice; that the improper ordering of a sanity mental evaluation did not merit reversal given lack of objection, later insanity notice, use of insanity at trial, and an absence of a specific showing of prejudice affecting the verdict; that the trial court erred in allowing a State’s witness to testify regarding the plot of the novel Crime and Punishment but that the error did not contribute to the verdict obtained beyond a reasonable doubt; that the cumulative effect of these errors did not require reversal; that the sentence to life imprisonment was legal; that the prosecutor’s statements during closing arguments did not require reversal; and that the sentence was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-1-0: Coleman for the court; Wilson concurred in result only without writing)

Merrimon v. State, 2025-KA-00579-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of receiving stolen property, holding that the judge did not err in granting a jury instruction on possession, that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-0: Sullivan for the court)

Other Orders

Smith v Dennis Wright & Son Plumbing, 2025-CT-00046-SCT (denying cert)
Braxton v. State, 2025-CT-00051-SCT (dismissing cert petition)
Ashford v. Belcher, 2025-CA-00569-SCT (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

August 13, 2026

Johnson v. Nichols, 2025-CP-00153-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment based on the statute of limitations, holding that the pro se appellant waived review of the summary judgment order by failing to identify any error in it, that the requested supplementation argument would not warrant reversal, and that the trial court did not commit any error on the merits.
(8-0: Coleman for the court)

Cathey v. Tanksley, 2025-EC-00724-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision in an election contest, holding that a special election was warranted because the breaking of a ballot box is sealed by the city clerk destroyed the sanctity of the election and opened the door for corruption and fraud whether there was actual fraud or not.
(7-0: Ishee for the court; Wilson did not participate)

In Re: Petition to Disqualify Adams: Littleton v Adams, 2026-EC-00618-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Affirming in part and vacating in part a circuit court’s judgment against the election commission in a residency challenge, holding that the election commission lacked jurisdiction to disqualify a candidate for county court judge.
(7-0: King for the court; Wilson not participating)

Other Orders

Banks v. State, 2024-CT-00881-SCT (denying cert)
Rush v. State, 2024-CT-00963-SCT (denying cert)
Williams v. Williams, 2025-IA-01525-SCT (denying motions for rehearing)
Chamberlin v. State, 2025-DR-01034-SCT (granting motion to dismiss third petition for PCR and dismissing petition for PCR)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 21, 2026

Our appellate courts are back in action after the standard summer hand-down break centered around the Mississippi Bar Convention. The Mississippi Court of Appeals strikes first with six opinions today.

Lewis v. State, 2025-CP-00341-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a PCR motion, holding of the trial court did not err in revoking post-release supervision.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

White v. White, 2025-CP-00575-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision to award joint legal and physical custody, holding that the decision was supported by substantial credible evidence.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

In the Matter of the Estate of Gibson: Vanderford v. Estate of Gibson, 2024-CA-01355-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s denial of a petition to adjudicate paternity, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding the petition untimely.
(8-2-0: McCarty for the Court; Barnes concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in result only without writing)

In the Matter of the Estate of Manyfield: Ogden & Associates, PLLC v. Sweet, 2025-CA-00417-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision denying a lien for attorney fees, holding that the chancellor abused his discretion and remanding for an apportionment of fees.
(8-2-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson and MacDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Davis v. Davis, 2025-CA-00363-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s custody decision, holding that the chancellor did not err in awarding custody to the mother despite the father’s arguments that the mother’s mental health was not properly considered.
(9-1-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

In the Interest of T.L. a Minor: Jessica L. v. Forrest County Department of the Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services, 2024-CA-00385-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the Youth Court’s decision terminating parental rights, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the decision, that the youth court properly found that CPS made reasonable reunification efforts, and that there was no merit to the mother’s argument that her counsel was ineffective.
(5-2-3: Barnes for the Court; Carlton and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; McCarty concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks and joined in part by McDonald)

Other Orders

Moore v. Sta-Home Health Agency of Carthage, Inc., 2023-CA-01267-COA (denying rehearing)
Turner v. City of Tupelo, 2024-CA-01146-COA (denying rehearing)
Gardner v. State, 2025-KA-00298-COA (denying rehearing)
Rudd v. State, 2025-CP-00618-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Triple Issue: Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 19, May 26, and June 2, 2026

I got covered up with paying work and had to let things slide around here for a bit. Here is three weeks of output from the prolific Mississippi Court of Appeals.

May 19, 2026

Small v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections, 2025-CP-00654-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming circuit court’s order denying complaint for judicial review, holding that the petitioner did not prove that MDOC’s decision was not supported by credible evidence, arbitrary or capricious, beyond MDOC’s scope of powers, or violative of constitutional rights.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

In Re: Order of Direct Criminal Contempt for Assistant District Attorney Andrew Willcutt, 2024-CA-01142-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing order holding an ADA in direct criminal contempt, holding that the ADA was entitled to notice of the charges against him and a de novo hearing before another judge.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Rush v. State, 2024-KA-01353-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of three counts of receiving stolen property, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Butler v. State, 2024-KA-00747-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that there was no error in admitting video to rebut the defendant’s testimony, that the use of impeachment evidence in closing was not improper, that admitting a heat of passion manslaughter instruction was not error, that the manslaughter instruction was not unconstitutional, that the claim for ineffective assistance of counsel was not ripe, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Brown v. State, 2025-CA-00428-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding it time-barred.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Gates v. State, 2024-CP-00074-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding it time-barred.
(7-3-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson, Westbrooks, and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Foreman v. State, 2024-KA-00728-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-2-1: Lawrence for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Carlton dissented without writing)

Waste Management of Mississippi, Inc. v. Chickasaw County, Mississippi, 2025-CA-00378-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s decisions denying summary judgment for Waste Management and granting summary judgment in favor of the County that sought to exercise an option to extend a solid waste agreement, holding that Mississippi law does not permit such agreements for more than 30 years so the plain language allowing for an extension to the extent it was consistent with Mississippi prevented the extension.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Rehm v. Robinson Property Group, LLC, 2025-CA-00043-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the dismissal of a personal injury on judicial estoppel grounds, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion dismissing the claim where the plaintiff failed to disclose the lawsuit during bankruptcy proceedings.
(7-3: Carlton for the Court; McDonald dissented without writing; Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald and McCarty)

Other Orders

Jenkins v. Jenkins, 2024-CA-00395-COA (denying rehearing)
Brown v. State, 2024-KA-00489-COA (denying rehearing)
Eloby v. State, 2024-KA-00529-COA (denying rehearing)
Jones v. State, 2024-KA-00760-COA (denying rehearing)

May 26, 2026

Coahoma County, Mississippi School District v. Williams, 2024-CA-00977-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision and rendering a decision in favor of the school board’s termination decision, holding that the school board’s decision to terminate a counselor who had an incident with another school counselor and said she needed a “license to carry” was supported by substantial evidence, that the chancery court exceeded the scope of review, and that the counselor’s due process rights were not violated.
(9-1-0: McCarty for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result only without written opinion)

Murphy v. State, 2024-KA-00664-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of attempted touching of a child for lustful purposes, holding that arguments related to jury instructions were procedurally barred for failure to raise then in a JNOV or new trial and, in any event, that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion instructing the jury.
(9-1-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Banks v. Banks, 2025-CA-00119-COA, consolidated with 2023-CA-00515-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing on direct appeal and cross appeal in a divorce case, holding that the chancellor erred in the equitable distribution of the marital estate, in awarding alimony, and in awarding attorney’s fees.
(8-2-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson and Lassitter St. Pe’ concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Qualls v. Qualls, 2023-KA-01112-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of being a felon in possession of a weapon following a fatal shooting at a bar but vacating and remanding the sentencing as violent habitual offender as the State conceded that the evidence at trial was not sufficient to establish habitual-offender status.
(8-0: Westbrooks for the Court; Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Watson v. State, 2024-KA-01149-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of felony child abuse, holding that arguments that the trial court erred by admitting testimony of prior bad acts were procedurally barred for lack of objection after the State filed a notice of intent to introduce the evidence before trial and that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions, and declining to address the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims.
(9-0: Wilson for the Court)

Patriot Inspects, LLC v. McKenzie, 2024-CA-01000-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the trial court’s decision denying a motion to compel arbitration, holding that the arbitration provision’s limitation of liability and one-year limitations period were substantively unconscionable and so intertwined with the agreement that the agreement was rendered unconscionable.
(6-4: Weddle for the Court; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes, Carlton, and Emfinger)

NOTE – I am putting this one on cert watch. Citing the Federal Arbitration Act, the dissent took issue with the majority’s holding that the arbitration agreement was rendered unconscionable by the limitation of liability and limitations period.

Other Orders

Moore v. State, 2024-KA-2024-01129-COA (denying rehearing)
Leggett v. State, 2024-CP-01214-COA (recalling mandate and accepting pro se motion for rehearing as timely)
Winn v. State, 2024-KA-01280-COA (denying rehearing)
Johnson v. State, 2024-KA-01348-COA (granting appellant’s pro se motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing)
Johnson v. State, 2025-TS-01344-COA (dismissing motion for post-conviction collateral relief for lack of jurisdiction)
Gray v. State, 2025-TS-1449-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)
Morris v. State, 2026-TS-00276-COA (dismissing untimely appeal)
Hill v. State, 2026-TS-00347-Dismissing appeal as untimely)
Daniels v. State, 2026-TS-00377-COA (allowing pro se appeal to proceed as timely)

Hand Down Page

June 2, 2026

Mhoon v. State, 2024-CA-00674-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion after an evidentiary hearing, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion after full consideration of the Miller factors.
(9-1-0: Emfinger for the Court: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Lee v. MDHS, 2025-SA-00318-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming denial of motion to reconsider denial of petition to set aside paternity judgment and child support order, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the petition for failure to meet statutory requirements or abuse its discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Days v. State, 2024-KA-00920-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of possession of meth with firearm enhancement and possession of a firearm as a felon, dismissing the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim without prejudice, and holding that arguments about the denial of an ore tenus motion to suppress were waived for failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress and that the plain-error doctrine did not apply.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Sullivan v. Sullivan, 2025-CP-00256-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s property division in a judgment of divorce, holding that the chancellor did not err in classification of the rental properties as marital assets but reversing with regard to other assets.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Harris v. State, 2025-KA-00084-COA (Criminal – Fel0ny)
Affirming convictions of first-degree murder an done count of aggravated assault, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error in giving an instruction that referenced accident and misfortune as well as self-defense.
(10-0: Westbrooks for the Court)

Lenoir v. State, 2024-KA-01342-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of trafficking a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance, holding the trial court did not err in failing to suppress evidence obtained during what the defendant argued was an invalid search warrant, that the trial court did not err in instructing the jury on constructive possession, that the evidence was sufficient to support the constructive possession conviction and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the indictment was not defective, and that he was not subject to double jeopardy.
(8-1-0: Carlton for the Court; Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Davis v. State, 2024-KA-01385-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one court of sexual battery and one count of touching a child for lustful purposes, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion instructing the jury on uncorroborated testimony of sex-crime victim and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Gaudin v. Gaudin, 2025-CA-00397-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s rulings granting divorce and distributing contested assets, holding that the chancellor did not err in ordering the sale of the marital home or in classification of assets and Ferguson factors.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Johnson v. State, 2024-KA-01097-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of more than two but less than ten grams of meth, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the impoundment and inventory search of the defendant’s vehicle in which the drugs were found were proper.
(6-3-1: Barnes for the Court; Wilson, Westbrooks, and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lassitter St. Pe’ concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Grant v. State, 2023-KA-01275-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon and possession of a stolen firearm, holding that the evidence was sufficient on both counts, that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence of gang affiliation for impeachment purposes or in admitting expert testimony regarding cellphone-location technology.
(6-1-3: Emfinger for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes and McDonald)

Other Orders

Smith v. Clarksdale Municipal School District, 2024-CA-00168-COA (denying rehearing)
UMMC v. Thomas, 2024-CA-01099-COA (denying rehearing)
Lovern v. State, 2024-KA-01449-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 10, 2026 (plus a bonus decision)

This is a catch-up post from the week I took off of blogging for my oral argument on February 11. The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions on February 10 and one off-schedule opinion on Thursday, February 5. Read on for summaries…

February 5, 2026

Gray v. State, 2023-KA-01270-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder and sentence to life imprisonment but reversing the imposition of a fine, holding that the trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant’s second statement was voluntary or by denying the defendant’s motion in limine to exclude other evidence, that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction, that the “flight instruction” issue was legally barred for failure to raise it in the trial court, and that there was no error and no prejudice regarding an alternate juror, but holding that there was not authority for the imposition of an assessment against the defendant as a partial reimbursement to the county for the defendant’s court-appointed counsel.
(5-5: Wilson for the Court; Barnes dissented, joined by Westbrooks, McDonald, McCarty, and Lassitter St. Pe’.

February 10, 2026

Lovern v. State, 2024-KA-01449-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery and gratification of lust, holding that the evidence was sufficient, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not err in excluding evidence of a victim’s prior behavior, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion regarding jury instructions, that the trial court did not err in allowing evidence of the defendant’s prior bad acts, that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion in limine that would have prevented the State from referring to the victim as “the victim,” that there was no abuse of discretion in the court’s limitations on voir dire questioning, that the trial court did not err in limiting the defendant’s references to the tyranny of the government during closing, that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s request to take possession of his phone to look for exculpatory text messages he alleged were missing from the extraction, that the trial court did not err in limiting the defendant to calling two character witnesses, that inconsistent verdicts (acquitting on one charge and convicting on two) was no basis for reversal, and that the cumulative error doctrine did not apply.
(9-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court; Emfinger did not participate)

Mize v. Nunmaker, 2025-CA-00089-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment for the defendant in a breach of contract case, holding that there was a genuine fact issue regarding whether there was a binding agreement between the parties and regarding whether the claim was time-barred.
(10-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)

Estate of Eaves: Schlesinger v. Eaves, 2024-CA-00692-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a probate matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying a request to set aside an inter vivos conveyance and assignment of a law firm based on an undue-influence argument and that the chancellor did not err by allegedly interfering with cross-examination at trial.
(8-2-0: Weddle for the Court; Wilson and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Southeast Financial Credit Union v. Brown, 2024-CA-01390-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of a debt collection claim for want of prosecution, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion dismissing the seven-year-old case after there were multiple periods of inactivity in excess of one year culminating in a two-year period of inactivity, a show cause order, and a non-appearance at the show cause hearing.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

DeCuir v. City of Laurel, 2024-CC-01055-COA, consolidated with Valentine v. City of Laurel, 2024-CC-01379-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of police officers’ appeals challenging the promotions of other officers, holding that the appeal was not perfected because the appellant filed a notice of appeal rather than a petition for writ of certiorari with the circuit court as is required to obtain judicial review of a civil service commission’s decision to promote.
(8-2-0: Wilson for the Court; Barnes and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Practice Point – This one is like a Final Jeopardy appellate jurisdiction question. Here is the Court’s conclusion:

Other Orders

Bird v. Ladner, 2024-CA_00245-COA (denying rehearing)
Thompson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, 2024-CA-00393-COA (denying rehearing)
Moody v. State, 2024-CA-00407-COA (denying rehearing)
Carter v. State, 2024-CP-013828-COA (recalling mandate and allowing pro se motion for rehearing to proceed)
Pedrego v. State, 2025-TS-01282-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely filed)
Buchanan v. State, 2025-TS-01445-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as timely)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 27, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down ten opinions yesterday. There is subject-matter variety, including a decision in the controversial case of the educator who was terminated for reading a certain book to second graders.

Daengbunga v. State, 2024-KA-01122-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of murder and tampering with evidence, holding that the trial court did not err in finding no Miranda violation and denying a motion to suppress statements and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion admitting evidence of prior bad acts.
(9-1-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Wright v. Brisco, 2025-CP-00258-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision where the appellant filed a brief with no citations to the record or case law except for two cases that were referenced by name only with no reporter citation and the appellee did not file a brief.
(10-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)

Note – This is the Court’s conclusion:

Wilson v. P.L. Marketing, Inc., 2025-WC-00158-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the Commission’s order affirming an order denying a motion to reopen that was filed more than a year after the claim was dismissed for the claimant’s failure to appear at a hearing on the merits.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Price v. Hinds County School District, 2024-CA-00841-COA (Civil – States, Boards & Agencies)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision that had affirmed the School Board’s decision to terminate an assistant principal, holding that the decision to terminate the assistant principal for reading “I Need a New Butt!” to a second-grade class.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Emfinger concurred in result only without writing)

Williams v. Williams, 2024-CA-00718-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part a chancellor’s judgment of divorce and contempt, holding that the ex-husband waived the issue of denying a motion to amend to add a ground after previously voluntarily-dismissing that ground, that the chancellor erred in classifying marital asserts and debt, that the chancellor erred in only awarding half a mortgage arrearage on a finding of contempt, that the chancellor erred in not awarding the full deficiency on a vehicle, and that the chancellor did not err in finding that the sale of the parties’ boat did not violate a court order or dissipate a marital asset.
(7-3-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle concurred in the result only without writing)

Dodson v. State, 2024-KA-00424-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted murder and conspiracy to commit auto theft, holding that the trial court did not err by refusing to give a jury instruction on aggravate assault as a lesser-included offense of attempted murder.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

City of Clinton v. Johnston, 2023-CA-01105-COA (Civil – PCR)
Dismissing the City’s appeal of the circuit court’s decision granting a motion for PCR, holding that the City lacked standing where it was not a party to the proceedings below and failed to intervene.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)’

Brown v. Mississippi Real Estate Commission, 2024-CC-01207-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the Commission’s decision to not renew a real estate license, holding that the decision based on untruthful and fraudulent representations to the Commission and felony conviction was supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary or capricious.
(8-2-0: Carlton for the Court; Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Jones v. State, 2024-KA-01426-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that based on counsel’s Lindsey brief, the defendant’s pro se brief, and the Court’s review of the record that there was no error.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Banks v. State, 2024-KA-00881-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter with a firearm enhancement, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(6-1-3: McCarty for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald dissented without writing; Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald and joined in part by Carlton)

Other Orders

Goodloe v. State, 2023-KA-00960-COA (denying rehearing)
Lovelace v. Board of Trustees, 2023-CA-01341-COA (denying rehearing)
Cameron v. Miller, 2023-CA-01388-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 13, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. There is a couple of domestic relations cases, one of which turns on an appellate jurisdiction issue. Then there are two direct criminal appeals, an MTCA case, and attorney’s fees case.

In Re Guardianship of K.G.W.: Garland v. Bunch, 2024-CA-01325-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Dismissing appeal stemming from a guardianship, holding that the Court lacked jurisdiction on the appeal taken under section 11-43-53 because there had been no trial of a habeas corpus.
(10-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)

O’Quin v. Davaul, 2024-CP-01327-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming dismissal of a complaint against the county tax assessor and granting judgment on the pleadings for failing to comply with MTCA requirements, holding that the pro se appellant’s arguments were without merit and were procedurally barred for failing to comply with the rules of appellate procedure.
(10-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)

Fraser v. State, 2023-KA-01129-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of culpable negligence manslaughter, holding that even if admission of emails and photographs from the victim’s phone showing past abuse was error it was harmless, that the trial court did not err in admitting an email from the defendant into evidence or in limiting the defendant’s expert witness’s testimony, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Elkins v. State, 2024-KA-00597-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that there were no issues warranting reversal after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Covington County Bank v. Scott Tractor & Equipment Company, 2024-CA-01071-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s denial of attorney’s fees, holding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the request for attorney’s fees that was sought after the defendant paid the debt with accrued interest on the same day the creditor filed a motion for entry of default.
(7-3: Westbrooks for the Court; Emfinger dissented, joined by Wilson and Lawrence)

Aultman v. Aultman, 2024-CA-00746-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part in a divorce case, holding that the chancellor erred with respect to the valuation of a home and remanding to reconsider valuation and equitable distribution but holding that the chancellor did not err in valuing an ESIP, retirement, and PERS accounts, did not err in awarding attorney’s fees for successful contempt proceedings.
(8-1-0: Carlton for the Court: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lassitter St. Pe’ did not participate)

Other Orders

Ryals v. State, 2023-KA-01192-COA (ordering the circuit clerk to supplement the appellate record with the transcript of the jury instruction conference by a date certain and further ordering that if it is not received by that date that the court reporter shall appear before the Court at a show cause hearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of December 4, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions yesterday. The most interesting is technically an adoption case, but it involves jurisdictional issues, unwritten local chancery court rules, appellate procedure, and appellate remedies. Both the majority opinion and the partial concurrence/partial dissent are worth your time.

Wiggins v. Southern Securities Group, LLC, 2024-CA-00251-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the trial court’s decision in a contract/business dispute, holding that the trial court did not err in granting one side’s motion for preliminary injunction or in denying the other side’s motion to compel mediation and/or arbitration.
(8-1: Griffis for the Court; Coleman dissented)

In the Matter of L.L.T.: Prince v. Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services, 2024-IA-00824-SCT (Civil – Adoption)
Affirming the youth court’s ruling that it lacked jurisdiction to finalize an adoption against a backdrop of the chancery court refusing set a hearing on adoption petitions, holding that the youth court did not err in finding that it lacked jurisdiction since chancery courts have exclusive jurisdiction.
(5-4: Coleman for the Court; Randolph dissented, joined by Ishee, Griffis, and Branning)

Note – The procedural posture of this one is strange as a result of the chancery court refusing to set a hearing on adoption petitions. The petitioner got creative and initiated the youth court action to create a record for an appeal so that they could seek relief from the appellate courts. The youth court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction and the petitioner was able to appeal. On appeal, the majority of the Supreme Court agreed that the youth court lacked jurisdiction but held that they could not provide any relief other than to affirm the youth court because no other relief was specifically sought. The Supreme Court made it clear that the chancery court should act, but found that it lacked a mechanism based on the issue presented on appeal to compel the chancery court to act. Here is how the majority opinion concluded:

The partial concurrence/partial dissent agreed that the youth court lacked jurisdiction, but was less diplomatic about the chancery court’s conduct and disagreed that Supreme Court’s hands are tied on this appeal:

Other Orders

McGee v. State, 2023-CT-00083-SCT (denying cert)
Childs v. State, 2023-CT-00126-SCT (denying cert)
In the Matter of Estate of Johnson: Manners v. Estate of Johnson, 2023-CT-00823-SCT (denying rehearing)
McNaughton v. State, 2023-CT-01099-SCT (denying cert)
Caffey v. Forrest Health, 2023-CT-01232-SCT (denying cert)
Carr v. State, 2024-CT-00185-SCT (denying cert)
Horne v. Dolgencorp LLC, 2024-CT-00376-SCT (denying cert)
Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2024-CT-00455-SCT (granting cert)
Rogers v. State, 2025-M-00257 (granting application for leave to proceed in the trial court)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of October 2, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One is a statute of frauds case and the other is an estate case involving real property. The latter includes a six-vote special concurrence.

Palmer’s Grocery Inc. v. Chandler’s JKE, Inc., 2024-IA-00194-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment on seven of ten claims stemming from the sale of a grocery store that fell through, holding that the plaintiffs complaint plausibly invoked the merchants’ exception and the part-performance exception to the Statute of Frauds.
(9-0: Ishee for the Court)

Practice Point – This one provides a good opportunity to brush up on the Statute of Frauds.

In the Matter of the Estate of Johnson: Manners v. Estate of Johnson, 2023-CT-00823-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the Court of Appeals and reinstating the judgment of the chancery court in an estate matter, holding that an Article of Agreement signed by the decedent did not operate as a deed was not a foundation for the basis of a claim against the estate.
(5-6*-3: Branning for the Court; Randolph specially concurred, joined by Maxwell, Ishee, Griffis, Sullivan, and Branning; Coleman dissented, joined by King and Chamberlin)

Practice Point – Chief Justice Randolph’s special concurrence garnered votes form five other justices, giving it precedential effect, however limited its reach may be. The special concurrence stated that Justice Branning’s “opinion is unassailably correct and consistent with the Court’s precedent” and took issue with the dissent.

Other Orders

In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (amending Appendix A to the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure to add the attached form subpoenas as follows: Exhibit A as Form 6, Exhibit B as Form 7, and Exhibit C as Form 8.)
In Re: Commission on Continuing Legal Education, 89-R-99011-SCT (granting Expedited Petition to Amend the Rules and Regulations for Mandatory Continuing Legal Education and the Amended Expedited Petition to Amend the Rules and Regulations for Mandatory Continuing Legal Education filed by the Mississippi Commission on Continuing Legal Education as set forth in Exhibit A.)
Clark v. State, 2022-DR-00829-SCT (denying rehearing)
United Services Automobile Association v. Estate of Minor, 2023-CA-000490SCT (denying rehearing by equally divided Court with Coleman not participating)
Chambers v. State, 2023-CT-00626-SCT (denying cert)
Craft v. State, 2023-CT-00915-SCT (denying cert)
Terry v. State, 2023-CT-00979-SCT (denying cert)
Rodriguez v. Diamondhead Country Club and Property Owners Association Inc., 2024-SCT-00238-SCT (denying cert)
Summers v. Big Black Land & Timber Company, LLC, 2025-M-00366-SCT (denying petition for interlocutory appeal)
Arnold v. Staffney, 2025-IA-00562-SCT (granting interlocutory appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 10, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. There is a child support case, a real property case resolved on the doctrine of res judicata, a contract case involving a rent-to-own contract, and three felony conviction appeals.

Brister v. Martin, 2022-CP-00931-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s final judgment of child support, holding that the chancellor did not err by issuing a new child support order following a new trial that was conducted after notice to the parties that prior orders were vacated or likely to be vacated.
(9-0: St. Pe’ for the Court)

Okorie v. Citizens Bank, 2024-CP-00462 -COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s dismissal of a complaint to quiet and confirm title, holding that the claim was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
(10-0: Lawrence for the Court)

Stubbs v. Ramsey, 2024-CA-00289-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the chancery court’s judgment granting declaratory and injunctive relief concerning a rent-to-own purchase home, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the rent-to-own contract was valid and binding even after the passing of a termination date, in not finding the renter committed a material breach by not completing the purchase by the specified closing date, or in fashioning an equitable remedy to prevent the renter from forfeiting payments made where the failure to close was no one person’s fault.
(9-1-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Walker v. State, 2023-KA-01012-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that the State did not improperly comment on whether the defendant would testify and that the defendant failed to show that his counsel was ineffective for failing to object, and holding that the record was insufficient to address the issue of whether counsel was ineffective for failing to respond to discovery.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks for the Court; Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00884-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted murder for shooting at someone with an AR-15 at close range, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Quinn v. State, 2023-KA-01143-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err by excluding a defense witness or evidence about the victim’s purportedly violent character.
(7-3-0: Carlton for the Court; Wilson, McDonald, and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

JLS Farm Partnership v. ’27 Break Hunting Club, Inc., 2023-CA-00434-COA (denying rehearing)
Haynes v. State, 2023-KA-00861-COA (denying rehearing)
McDonald v. Pruwitt, 2023-CA-01312-COA (granting appellant’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 25, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. One opinion is an appeal from a hybrid MTCA/common law med mal trial that cites a law journal article I wrote several years ago on an unresolved procedural conundrum. There is also a premises liability summary judgment case, a breach of contract/attorney’s fees case, three direct criminal appeals, and two PCR cases.

Brown v. State, 2023-CA-00921-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR, holding that the trial court did not err in summarily dismissing the PCR petition as time-barred.
(10-0)

Foote v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport, 2023-CA-00504-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit court’s judgment in a med mal action against a hospital (a public entity) and a surgeon and the surgeon’s clinic (private entities) after a single, bifurcated bench and jury trial in which the trial court dismissed the claims against the hospital, holding that if the trial court relied on counsel’s closing statements as evidence it was error but harmless because there was sufficient evidence on the point, that the trial court did not err in finding that the plaintiff failed to present a prima facie case that the surgeon proximately caused or contributed to the injuries, and that the plaintiff failed to object to the jury’s involvement in the MTCA claim so the trial court did not err in partially bifurcating the trial where the jury decided the claims against the private defendants and gave an advisory verdict as to the public defendant, and that the trial court did not err in allowing the jury to allocate fault to the public defendant and the finding that the allocation was not supported by substantial evidence.
(7-2-1: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing, Lawrence dissented)

NOTE – I was excited to see one of my law review articles cited in this opinion. (If you are so inclined, you can read my article here.) There is no clear guidance from the rules or case law as to how trials should proceed when there a public defendant (entitled to a bench trial under the MTCA) and private defendant (entitled to a jury trial under Mississippi’s constitution, et al). I advocated for a specific procedure in the article that was cited in today’s opinion. In today’s case, the public defendant advocated for the procedure I proposed and the plaintiff argued for a different approach that involved the jury rendering an advisory verdict as to the public defendant. The trial court adopted the plaintiff’s approach. The plaintiff complained about the procedure on appeal, but the Court of Appeals held he could not argue that the trial court erred in following his proposal. Here is the Court of Appeals’ recapitulation of the argument following my proposal:

In 2016, the Rules Committee on Civil Procedure solicited input for a “Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure Revision Project.” I submitted a proposed amendment to Rule 38 along with a copy of my article:

I never did hear anything back.

Blumer v. Majestic Homes, LLC, 2024-CA-00163-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of a homeowner against a home builder awarding liquidated damages, attoyne’s fees, and expenses, holding that the trial court did not err entering a corrected order granting relief under Rule 60(b) since there had been no judgment expressly adjudicating the remaining claims and that the trial court did not err in dismissing the claims against the home builder in his individual capacity, but that the trial court did err in reducing the award of attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Dewberry v. State, 2023-KA-01135-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of sexual battery, one count of fondling, and one count of child exploitation, holding that the trial court did not err in seating jurors after a Batson challenge and that a jury instruction did not constitute a constructive substantive amendment of a count in the indictment under the plain-error doctrine.
(10-0)

Rodriguez v. Diamondhead Country Club, 2024-CA-00238-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendant in a premises liability case, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that a one-half-inch height differential between sidewalk slabs was not a dangerous or unreasonably hazardous condition or in finding that there was no evidence to support a negligence per se claim under the ADA where the plaintiff was not disabled.
(10-0)

Thomas v. State, 2023-KA-00512-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting a Facebook post, that the trial court did not err denying a directed verdict under Weathersby, that the conviction was support by sufficient evidence, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress the defendant’s statements to law enforcement, that the trial court did not err in admitting autopsy photos, and that the cumulative error doctrine did not apply.
(8-2-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Rasberry v. State, 2023-KA-01161-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of failing to register as a sex offender, holding that the lack of specificity in the indictment was at most harmless error, that the trial court did not err by granting an unopposed motion to amend the indictment, and that trial counsel was not ineffective.
(10-0)

Deer v. State, 2024-CP-00019-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court properly dismissed the motion pursuant to the UPCCRA’s three-year statute of limitations.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Other Orders

None

Hand Down Page