The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions today: four direct criminal appeals and one PCR case. Three of the four criminal cases dealt with jury instruction issues.
Craft v. State, 2023-KA-00915-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction second-degree murder, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in giving instructions on lesser-included offenses for which the defendant was not specifically indicted, and declining to address ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal.
(8-1-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in result without writing; Carlton did not participate)
Hagan v. State, 2023-KA-00880-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing the defendant’s lesser-included-offense jury instruction.
(10-0)
Wilson v. State, 2023-CP-01050-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s order denying a PCR motions and finding that they were frivolous, successive, time-barred, and barred by res judicata.
(10-0)
Jones v. State, 2022-KA-01124-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of first-degree murder and felon in possession, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction or a proposed instruction on the defense of necessity, and finding the pro se arguments that the indictment was insufficient, that habitual offender status was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the defendant’s Confrontation Clause rights were violated during the sentencing hearing lacked merit.
(8-1-0: McDonald concurs in result only without writing; Lawrence did not participate)
Johnson v. State, 2023-KA-00870-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of felon in possession of a firearm, holding that the second felon-in-possession count did not violate double jeopardy because the weapons were acquired at different times and the search and seizure of his the defendant’s vehicle were lawful.
(9-1: McDonald dissented without written opinion)
Other Orders
- None
Mississippi Appeals Blog 