The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down ten opinions yesterday. There is subject-matter variety, including a decision in the controversial case of the educator who was terminated for reading a certain book to second graders.
Daengbunga v. State, 2024-KA-01122-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of murder and tampering with evidence, holding that the trial court did not err in finding no Miranda violation and denying a motion to suppress statements and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion admitting evidence of prior bad acts.
(9-1-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing)
Wright v. Brisco, 2025-CP-00258-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision where the appellant filed a brief with no citations to the record or case law except for two cases that were referenced by name only with no reporter citation and the appellee did not file a brief.
(10-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)
Note – This is the Court’s conclusion:
Wilson v. P.L. Marketing, Inc., 2025-WC-00158-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the Commission’s order affirming an order denying a motion to reopen that was filed more than a year after the claim was dismissed for the claimant’s failure to appear at a hearing on the merits.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)
Price v. Hinds County School District, 2024-CA-00841-COA (Civil – States, Boards & Agencies)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision that had affirmed the School Board’s decision to terminate an assistant principal, holding that the decision to terminate the assistant principal for reading “I Need a New Butt!” to a second-grade class.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Emfinger concurred in result only without writing)
Williams v. Williams, 2024-CA-00718-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part a chancellor’s judgment of divorce and contempt, holding that the ex-husband waived the issue of denying a motion to amend to add a ground after previously voluntarily-dismissing that ground, that the chancellor erred in classifying marital asserts and debt, that the chancellor erred in only awarding half a mortgage arrearage on a finding of contempt, that the chancellor erred in not awarding the full deficiency on a vehicle, and that the chancellor did not err in finding that the sale of the parties’ boat did not violate a court order or dissipate a marital asset.
(7-3-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle concurred in the result only without writing)
Dodson v. State, 2024-KA-00424-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted murder and conspiracy to commit auto theft, holding that the trial court did not err by refusing to give a jury instruction on aggravate assault as a lesser-included offense of attempted murder.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)
City of Clinton v. Johnston, 2023-CA-01105-COA (Civil – PCR)
Dismissing the City’s appeal of the circuit court’s decision granting a motion for PCR, holding that the City lacked standing where it was not a party to the proceedings below and failed to intervene.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)’
Brown v. Mississippi Real Estate Commission, 2024-CC-01207-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the Commission’s decision to not renew a real estate license, holding that the decision based on untruthful and fraudulent representations to the Commission and felony conviction was supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary or capricious.
(8-2-0: Carlton for the Court; Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)
Jones v. State, 2024-KA-01426-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that based on counsel’s Lindsey brief, the defendant’s pro se brief, and the Court’s review of the record that there was no error.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)
Banks v. State, 2024-KA-00881-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter with a firearm enhancement, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(6-1-3: McCarty for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald dissented without writing; Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald and joined in part by Carlton)
Other Orders
- Goodloe v. State, 2023-KA-00960-COA (denying rehearing)
- Lovelace v. Board of Trustees, 2023-CA-01341-COA (denying rehearing)
- Cameron v. Miller, 2023-CA-01388-COA (denying rehearing)
Mississippi Appeals Blog 