Madison Taylor

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 2 and November 9, 2023

I too have noticed that I have been falling behind in summarizing weekly decisions. The Mississippi Supreme Court was pretty quite these last two weeks, so I have combined them into one post. Read to the end for a significant PCR decision.

November 2, 2023

Lamy v. Lamy, 2021-CT-00770-SCT (dismissing cert on the Court’s own motion)

Estate of Bell v. Estate of Bell, 2021-CT-00789-SCT (denying cert)

Everett v. State, 2021-CT-01385-SCT (denying cert)

November 9, 2023

Hathorne v. State, 2021-CT-00306-SCT (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the circuit court’s denial of PCR motion and the decision of the court of appeals affirming the denial, holding that the indictment was defective, that the challenge to the substantive sufficiency of the indictment could not be waived and thus was not procedurally barred, and therefore reversing the conviction and sentence and rendered judgment dismissing the indictment.
(8-0: Randolph did not participate)

NOTE – This case is a big deal. Here is now the Supreme Court wrapped up its opinion:

Other Orders

Godbolt v. State, 2020-DP-00440-SCT (denying motion to make oral arguments)

McCollum v. State, 2021-KA-01276-SCT (denying rehearing)

McDowell v. State, 2021-CT-01381-SCT (granting cert)

Powers v. State, 2023-DR-00895-SCT (denying the State’s Motion to Strike Stephen Elliot Powers’s First Supplement to Successor Petition for Post-Conviction Relief and the State’s Motion to Strike Powers’s Motion for Access to Jurors and Disclosure of Documents)

Hand Down Page for November 2, 2023

Hand Down Page for November 9, 2023

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of October 26, 2023

The one opinion today from the Mississippi Supreme Court delves into the issue of standing. It addresses traditional standing and associational standing.

Jackson Public School District, v. Jackson Federation of Teachers and PSRPS, 2022-CA-00464-SCT (Civil – Other)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of the school district’s motion to dismiss a claim that the school district violated federation members’ free speech rights, holding that the federation lacked standing in its own right and lacked associational standing because the federation offered no direct evidence that any of its members were employed by the school district.
(6-3: Coleman dissented, joined by Kitchens and King)

NOTE – This case seemed to hing on the fact that the federation did not prove that any of its members were employed by the school district.

Other Orders

Nunn v. State, 2021-CT-01371-SCT (denying cert)

Parker v. Mississippi Department of Health, 2022-CT-00552-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of October 19, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions on Thursday. There is an appeal of a life imprisonment sentence, an appeal of a sanction in a workers’ comp case, and an appeal of an order compelling arbitration in a construction contract dispute.

Harris v. State, 2022-KA-01113-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming resentencing to life for depraved heart murder, holding that the sentence to life imprisonment was not mandatory but within the trial court’s discretion under the sentencing guidelines.
(9-0)

Howard Industries, Inc. v. Hayes, 2021-CT-00694-SCT (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming sanction against the employer’s attorney, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s award of sanctions related to the presentation of an expert report that was prepared based on representations the attorney made to the expert.
(5-4: Beam dissented, joined by Coleman, Maxwell, and Chamberlin)

McInnis Electric Company v. Brasfield & Gorrie, LLC, 2021-CA-01115-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming order compelling arbitration in a breach of contract suit filed by a subcontractor against the prime contractor, holding that the parties entered into an arbitration agreement and that the subcontractor’s claims were within the arbitration agreement.
(6-2: Kitchens dissented, joined by King; Randolph did not participate)

NOTE – The underlying dispute between the subcontractor and prime contractor is intertwined with the arrival of COVID-19 in Mississippi. Kitchens’s dissent asserted that the ability to perform a contract during the pandemic was not within the contemplated scope of the arbitration agreement that did not contain a force majeure clause.

Other Orders

Williams v. Mississippi District Council for Assemblies of God, 2021-CA-01007-SCT (rehearing denied)

Everett v. State, 2021-CT-01415-SCT (denying cert)

In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2023-AD-00001-SCT (directing the disbursement of $137,218.03 in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 17, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions today. There is one divorce case, one direct criminal appeal, and one appeal of the dismissal of a negligence case for the plaintiff’s failure to comply with discovery and discovery-related orders from the circuit court.

Capocaccia v. Capocaccia, 2022-CA-00129-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s findings on equitable distribution, child support, and college expenses but affirming finding that the father was in contempt, holding that the chancellor erred in the division of the marital estate without referencing or discussion the parties’ debts and assets, erred in awarding child support in excess of the statutory guidelines without specific findings supporting the deviation, and erred in assigning equal responsibility for the children’s college expenses; but that there was no reversible error in denying the father’s motion to continue contempt proceedings or in finding the father in contempt.
(8-2-0: Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Russell v. State, 2022-KA-00447-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding there was no error in allowing a State’s witness to narrate events depicted in a surveillance video while it was played to the jury.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

McAlpin v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, 2022-CA-00334-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision granting a motion to dismiss in a negligence suit based on the plaintiff’s failure to heed court-ordered discovery requirements, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the plaintiff’s motion for additional time to comply with the scheduling order that was filed after the court had advised there would be no more extensions and on the date that the court had ordered that additional discovery responses were due and that the trial court did not err in dismissing the case with prejudice for repeated failures to comply with the court’s orders.
(10-0)

PRACTICE POINT – Here is the Court’s analysis of the facts of this case under standard in Beck v. Sapet, 937 So. 2d 945 (Miss. 2006):

Other Orders

Grantham v. Grimm, 2021-CA-01314-COA (denying rehearing)

SDBT Archives LLC v. Penn-Star Insurance Company, 2022-CA-00099-COA (denying rehearing)

Williams v. State, 2022-KA-00100-COA (denying rehearing)

Hamilton v. State, 2022-CP-00217-COA (denying rehearing)

Sanders v. Reeves, 2022-CP-01059-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of October 12, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion today. It is a civil statute-of-limitations case that split the Court 6-3 on whether a subrogation claim accrued on the date a fire started or the date it was extinguished and the cause could be assessed.

Western World Ins. Group v. KC Welding, LLC, 2022-CA-00527-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision granting a motion to dismiss a subrogation claim on statute of limitations grounds, holding that where a fire at an industrial woodchip manufacturer started on July 12 after welding was done to repair the door of a box containing woodchips, and was extinguished five to six hours later on July 13, the cause of action accrued on July 12 because the fire was not a latent injury .
(6-3: Kitchens dissented, joined by King and Griffis)

Other Orders

In Re: Rules Governing Admission to The Mississippi Bar, 89-R-99012-SCT (reappointing Anthony R. Simon, Kristopher A. Powell, and Joseph D. Neyman, Jr. to three-year terms (11/1/23 through 10/31/26) as members of the Mississippi Board of Bar Admissions)

In Re: Judicial Election Oversight Committee, 2021-M-01306-SCT (reappointing Hon. Edward E. Patten, Jr., Paul P. Blake, and Thomas A. Wicker as members of the Judicial Election Oversight Committee for new four-year terms)

Hope v. State, 2022-CT-00031-SCT (denying cert)

Arlington Properties, Inc. v. Rudd, 2023-M-00382-SCT (denying petition for interlocutory appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 10, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. All but three are direct criminal appeals. Of the six direct criminal appeals, two are reversals. On the non-criminal side of the ledger are an MDES case, a custody decision, and a tangled web of a case stemming from the sale of a log house.

Crutchfield v. State, 2022-KA-00815-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first degree murder and felon in possession of a firearm, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and that it was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Hoffman v. MDES, 2022-CC-00948-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming denial of a claim for unemployment benefits based on the COVID-19 pandemic, holding that substantial evidence supported the finding that bank statements alone did not provide sufficient evidence of self-employment income, that the claimant’s right to a fair hearing was not violated, and that the claimant was required to repay an overpayment amount.

(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Jackson v. State, 2022-KA-00009-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing murder conviction, holding that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction where the State’s case rested entirely on circumstantial evidence of motive and proximity.
(6-1-3: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without written opinion; Emfinger dissented, joined by Greenlee)

NOTE – Here is the heart of the Court’s reasoning:

Rodgers v. State, 2022-KA-00179-COA (Civil – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth but reversing conviction of conspiracy to sell meth, holding that there was insufficient evidence of the conspiracy count because the alleged co-conspirator was not aware of the alleged conspiracy.
(7-1-0: McDonald concurred in part and in result without written opinion; Westbrooks and Emfinger did not participate.)

White v. State, 2022-KA-00607-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction or armed robbery, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting the defendant’s admissions of guilt during his interrogation because the admission was freely and voluntarily made and because the probative value was not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.
(10-0)

Young v. Niblett, 2022-CA-00294-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision modifying custody and awarding sole physical custody to the father, holding that the evidence supported the chancellor’s determination that there was a material change in circumstances and holding that the chancellor’s failure to include a summary of the GAL’s qualifications along with the summary of the GAL’s recommendations was not reversible error.
(10-0)

Britt v. Orrison, 2022-CP-00165-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancery court’s dismissal of a petition for contempt, holding that the Court lacked jurisdiction to consider the issue of the appellant’s request for costs stemming from a prior appeal and that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in denying a motion to recuse, but that the chancellor erred in dismissing the petition for contempt with respect to the sale of a log house.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in result only without written opinion; Lawrence did not participate.)

NOTE – There is a lot of procedural background and litigation background in this opinion that I have not delved into.

Kirkland v. State, 2022-KA-00851-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of nine counts of touching a child for lustful purposes, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying a motion to sever and hold three different trials for each of the three victims and or in finding no discovery violation when the State did not tell the defense that one of the victims had her disclosure date tattooed on her wrist.
(8-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without written opinion; Smith did not participate.)

Bolton v. State, 2022-KA-01118-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of business burglary, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s request for a larceny instruction and that there was no error in denying the motion for new trial because the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-1: McDonald dissented without written opinion.)

Other Orders

Gussio v. Gussio, 2020-CA-00785-COA (denying motion for appellate attorney’s fees)

Manley v. Manley, 2021-CA-00700-COA (denying rehearing)

Knight v. State, 2021-CP-01192-COA (denying rehearing)

Prather v. State, 2021-KA-01416-COA (denying rehearing)

Brown v. State, 2022-CP-00069-COA (denying rehearing)

Brandi’s Hope Community Services, LLC v. Walters, 2022-CA-00188-COA (denying rehearing)

Keller v. State, 2023-TS-00901-COA (granting time to respond to show cause notice)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of October 5, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today, but do not be deceived by that stat. One of the opinions is a 100+ page decision in a death-penalty PCR case. The other is an appeal of denial a motion to compel arbitration. There is also a linked attorney-discipline case.

Galloway v. State, 2013-DR-01796-SCT (Criminal – Death Penalty – Post Conviction)
Denying motion for leave to proceed in the trial court with PCR petition, holding that (1) the petitioner failed to overcome the presumption that what trial counsel did and did not present as mitigating evidence such as the petitioner’s “true-life story” and mental health issues during the penalty phase might be considered sound trial strategy instead of ineffective assistance; (2) there was no merit to the petitioner’s claim of ineffective assistance during jury selection where counsel used no Batson challenges and an all-white jury was seated or that counsel was otherwise ineffective in voir dire; (3) there was no merit to the petitioner’s claim of ineffective assistance during guilt-innocence phase for not investigating or challenging lack of investigating/challenging the medical examiner’s testimony, in limiting the review of Defense expert’s forensic expert or failing to consult with/prepare him, in failing to assert a Miss. R. Evid. 702 pretrial challenge to the medical examiner’s testimony, or failing to object to the medical examiner’s testimony as outside the scope of the disclosed testimony; (4) there was no merit to the claim that the State corrupted the truth-seeking function of the trial by suppressing material impeachment evidence or presenting false and misleading evidence; (5) the death verdict was not unconstitutionally coerced from a holdout juror; (6) a juror’s exposure to medical coverage showing the victim violated constitutional rights; (7) a juror’s false statement during voir dire that he had not previously served on a criminal jury did not give rise to an inference of prejudice; (8) the petitioner did not show that he was prejudiced when he was placed the defendant in an electronic restraint; (9) death by lethal injection would not violate the petitioner’s rights under the Eighth Amendment or Fourteenth Amendment; and (10) there was no aggregation of errors mandating a reversal.
(9-0)

PriorityOne Bank v. Folkes, 2022-CA-00429-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming denial of motion to compel arbitration, holding that the bank waived the right to arbitration by substantially participating in the litigation and did not file a motion to compel arbitration until after an amended complaint was filed.
(7-2: Griffis dissented, joined by Beam)

PRACTICE POINT – The Supreme Court’s decision appears to hinge on the fact that the amended complained did not add a new cause of action (which was in dispute). This was enough to affirm the denial of the motion to compel arbitration, but the Supreme Court made it clear the plaintiff was bound by her representation that no new claim was asserted:

Other Orders

Jarvis v. State, 2021-M-01196 (denying application for leave to proceed in the trial court, finding the filing frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings could result in sanctions)

The Mississippi Bar v. Hessler, 2023-BD-00057-SCT (suspending an attorney from the practice of law for one year and one day, with the suspension deferred retroactively to June 22, 2022)

Wakefield v. State, 2021-CT-00187-SCT (denying cert)

Buchanan v. Hope Federal Credit Union, 2021-CT-00218-SCT (denying cert)

In Re: Resignation of Emily Bonds Davey f/k/a Emily Sides Bonds From The Practice of Law in Mississippi, 2023-BD-00963 (granting leave under Rule 11(b) of the Rules of Discipline for the Mississippi State Bar to resign in good standing from the practice of law in Mississippi)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 26, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There is something for everyone: tort, real property, divorce, direct criminal appeals, and PCR. Due to volume of paying work and COA output I had to move quickly to get these out, so I expect a higher-than-normal rate of typos.

Odom v. State, 2021-KA-00676-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of murder, holding that computer printouts of GPS and location data from Google were not properly authenticated and should not have been admitted but that the error was harmless, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting photos of a vehicle over an authentication objection, that the trial court did not err in excluding paint-transfer evidence and crime lab documents for lack of authenticity, and holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence.
(7-3: Wilson dissented without written opinion; Westbrooks dissented, joined in part by McDonald)

Practice Point – On the authenticity of Google satellite images, the Court noted that the images themselves were not hearsay, but that computer-generated data included on the photos required authentication:

Robb v. McLaughlin, 2021-CA-00672-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming a judgment after jury trial in a negligence/infliction of emotional distress/invasion of privacy/defamation/libel case stemming from the defendant posting a false ad for prostitution online with the plaintiff’s phone number, holding that the defendant’s due process rights were not violated, the proceedings were properly bifurcated into compensatory and punitive phases, the plaintiff was not required to produced expert medical testimony on her intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, the damages were not speculative, and the jury instructions were appropriate.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without written opinion.)

Practice Point– I have cited the 5th Circuit’s Krieser decisions for the proposition that settlement as to one defendant does not affect apportionment at trial–a proposition that can cut either way. It is nice to have a Mississippi Court of Appeals decision to cite (citing Krieser) for this proposition.

Alexander v. State, 2022-CA-00397-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion that argued ineffective assistance of counsel, holding that the circuit court’s decision was not clearly erroneous, legally in error, or an abuse of discretion.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without written opinion)

Bradshaw v. State, 2022-KA-00469-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that the indictment was not overly broad to the point it failed to provide sufficient notice under a plain error analysis or on the merits, that there was no violation of the right to speedy trial, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony of prior bad acts because it complied with Rule 404(b).
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate.)

Smith v. State, 2022-KA-00664-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery of a child, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the defendant’s motion for continuance because the State’s discovery violations did not result in manifest injustice, that the trial court did not commit plain error by severing the codefendant’s case without a proper motion, and that the lack of error precluded reversal for cumulative error.
(10-0)

Titus v. Stelzer, 2022-CA-01079-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s order in a suit to set aside a quitclaim deed and to confirm and quiet title, holding that the chancellor did not err in setting aside the quitclaim deed and confirming title through a prior conveyance.
(9-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without written opinion.)

Gregg v. State, 2022-KA-00485-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of amphetamine and marijuana, holding that the sole issue on appeal–ineffective assistance of counsel–should be dismissed without prejudice because the record was insufficient to address the issue on direct appeal.
(10-0)

Patel v. State, 2022-CA-00985-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion to withdraw and vacate a prior admission of guilt in a pretrial intervention after the petitioner learned that even with dismissal and expungement he was not eligible for lawful permanent residence status under the INA, holding that the circuit court properly dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate.)

Gussio v. Gussio, 2020-CA-00785-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s judgment in a divorce case granting the mother a divorce and granting her physical and legal custody of the children, holding that the chancellor did not err in the amount of child support awarded, in not imputing income to the mother, in awarding alimony, by denying the father’s motion in limine to exclude evidence of the mother’s attorney’s fees, in awarding attorney’s fees, or in denying motion to alter or amend the judgment and consider new evidence.
(5-5: Wilson concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Greenlee, Lawrence, Smith, and Emfinger.)

NOTE – Judge Wilson’s partial dissent agreed with the rulings on child support and alimony, but asserted that the award of attorneys’ fees should not be affirmed because the record and the chancellor’s findings on attorneys’ fees were insufficient. I am putting this one on my cert watchlist.

Other Orders

Lynn v. State, 2021-KA-00968-COA (denying rehearing)

Culver v. Culver, 2021-CA-01108-COA (denying rehearing)

Stevenson v. State, 2021-KA-01286-COA (recalling mandate)

Lestrick v. State, 2021-CP-01409-COA (denying motion for additional time to file motion for rehearing)

Covin v. Covin, 2022-COA-00019-COA (denying motion for appellate attorney’s fees)

Amos v. State, 2022-KA-00171-COA (denying motion for enlargement of time to file motion for rehearing)

Pickle v. State, 2022-CP-00929-COA (recalling mandate)

Rehabilitation Centers, Inc. v. Williams, 2023-WC-00453-COA (granting motion to dismiss consolidated appeals as interlocutory)

Miller v. State, 2023-TS-00812-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as timely)

Gardner v. State, 2023-TS-00903-COA (granting motion to consolidate)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of September 21, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions today. There is an estates case, a domestic relations case, and a direct criminal appeal. However, the main stage act is a decision on the constitutionality of HB 1020 (and part of that decision was unanimous).

In Re The Estate of Herbert Bernard Ivison, Jr.: Malouf & Malouf, PLLC v. The Estate of Herbert Bernard Ivison, Jr., 2022-CA-00837-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the chancellor’s ruling that a law firm’s probated claim against a state was barred by statute, holding that the law firm had no reason to pursue further additional legal actions to secure payment of its claim after timely probating the claim.
(8-0: Griffis did not participate.)

West v. West, 2020-CA-01206-SCT consolidated with 2022-CA-00147, 2002-IA-01158, 2008-CA-01700, 2009-CA-01877, 2010-CA-00316 (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversed on direct appeal and cross appeal, holding that the chancellor erred in his priority-of-liens analysis and remanding for a determination of whether capital stock certificates conspicuously noted bylaws restrictions, holding that the chancellor erred in failing to address a retroactive child support claim, and holding that because one party engaged in claim-splitting the chancellor’s decision in the consolidated case was reversed with orders to dismiss the case and reinstate a 2008 judgment, writs of garnishment, and writs of execution.
(8-0: Beam did not participate.)

NOTE – This is a 44-page opinion with a lot going on. Be advised that my summary is even broader than usual.

Jenkins v. State, 2022-KA-00754-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of DUI (third offense), holding that the trial court did not err in granting a jury instruction that the State was not required to prove that alcohol impaired the defendant’s ability to drive or level of impairment and did not err in refusing the defendant’s instruction on the defendant’s theory of the case where most of the language of that instruction was incorporated into another instruction.
(5-1*-3: Maxwell specially concurred, joined by four justices from the majority: Coleman, Beam, Chamberlin, and Griffis; Kitchens dissented, joined by King.)

NOTE – Justice Maxwell’s concurrence garnered four other votes giving it precedential effect. That special concurrence held that “an instruction like S-8’s potential to confuse weight heavily against giving it in Section (1)(a) common law DUI cases.” The concurrence also noted that even if this instruction was given in error, it would have been harmless due to the overwhelming evidence of guilt.

Here is the text of the instruction at issue:

Saunders v. State, 2023-CA-00584-SCT (Civil – Unconstitutional Statute)
Affirming in part and reversing in part in the HB 1020 case, holding (1) the creation of the CCID inferior court is Section 4 of HB 1020 is constitutional but (2) Section 1’s creation of four “temporary special circuit judges” to be appointed by the Chief Justice to “almost-four-year-terms” violates the Mississippi Constitution’s requirement that circuit judges be elected.
(6-2: Kitchens dissented as to the constitutionality of CCID inferior court, joined by King; Kitchens and King concurred as to the unconstitutionality of appointing the temporary judges; Randolph did not participate)

NOTE – Here is the crux of the reasoning behind the unanimous holding that the appointment process in HB 1020 is unconstitutional:

Other Orders

Moore v. State, 2021-M-00111 (denying application for leave to proceed in the trial court, finding the filing frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings may result in sanctions)

Hull v. State, 2022-CT-00088-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 19, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions today. There are two direct criminal appeals (including a reversal on sufficiency-of-the-evidence grounds), an appeal of summary judgment in an MTCA negligence claim, and claim by a constable for wrongful removal.

Love v. State, 2021-KA-01014-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after the defendant was convicted of capital murder, aggravated assault, and armed robbery x3, holding that the trial court did not err in denying motion to sever, in denying motion for mistrial after brief exposure of wrist restraints to the jury venire, or in refusing a Milano instruction; that the indictment for capital murder was legally sufficient and the jury instruction on that count not erroneous; and that the defendant was not placed in double jeopardy, but that the evidence was not legally sufficient to support the armed robbery conviction.
(10-0)

J&A Excavation, Inc. v. City of Ellisville, 2022-CA-00533-COA (Civil – Other) consolidated with J&A Excavation, Inc. v. Jones County, 2022-CA-00547-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision that affirmed the Board of Aldermen and Board of Supervisors, holding that the decisions were not supported by substantial evidence and were arbitrary and capricious where the plaintiff’s low bid on a public construction contract was rejected and the next-lowest bid was accepted with no record evidence regarding qualifications, reputation, or capabilities of the bidder selected.
(10-0)

Bailey v. Jefferson County Board of Supervisors, 2022-CP-00950-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision affirming the Board of Supervisors’ decision to removal a constable, holding that there was not substantial evidence to support the removal, rendering judgment in favor of the constable, and remanding for a determination of damages.
(8-1: Emfinger dissented without separate written opinion.)

Moore v. Jackson Public School System, 2022-CA-00595-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing summary judgment dismissing a negligence claim under the MTCA, holding that the circuit court erred by granting summary judgment on other grounds where the actual motion was based only on “broad legal arguments” that did not challenge the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s evidence.
(6-3: Carlton dissented, joined by Greenlee, Westbrooks, and McDonald)

Others Orders

Carroll v. State, 2021-CP-00959-COA (denying rehearing)

Ehrhardt v. State, 2021-KA-01143-COA (denying rehearing)

Jordan v. State, 2021-KA-01421-COA (denying rehearing)

In the Matter of the Estate of Roosa v. Roosa, 2022-CA-00128-COA (denying rehearing)

Rhodes v. RL Stratton Properties LLC, 2022-CA-00338-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page