Madison Taylor

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 4, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions today: four direct criminal appeals and one PCR case. Three of the four criminal cases dealt with jury instruction issues.

Craft v. State, 2023-KA-00915-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction second-degree murder, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in giving instructions on lesser-included offenses for which the defendant was not specifically indicted, and declining to address ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal.
(8-1-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in result without writing; Carlton did not participate)

Hagan v. State, 2023-KA-00880-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing the defendant’s lesser-included-offense jury instruction.
(10-0)

Wilson v. State, 2023-CP-01050-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s order denying a PCR motions and finding that they were frivolous, successive, time-barred, and barred by res judicata.
(10-0)

Jones v. State, 2022-KA-01124-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of first-degree murder and felon in possession, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction or a proposed instruction on the defense of necessity, and finding the pro se arguments that the indictment was insufficient, that habitual offender status was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the defendant’s Confrontation Clause rights were violated during the sentencing hearing lacked merit.
(8-1-0: McDonald concurs in result only without writing; Lawrence did not participate)

Johnson v. State, 2023-KA-00870-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of felon in possession of a firearm, holding that the second felon-in-possession count did not violate double jeopardy because the weapons were acquired at different times and the search and seizure of his the defendant’s vehicle were lawful.
(9-1: McDonald dissented without written opinion)

Other Orders

None

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 30, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions today. There was a UM dec action along with three direct criminal appeals. One of the direct criminal appeals resulted in reversal based on an erroneous jury instruction.

Williams v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 2023-CA-01225-SCT (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming the trial court’s decision granting a UM carrier’s motion for summary judgment in a dec action, holding that the UM policy did not unlawfully restrict or reduce coverage mandated by Mississippi’s UM Act and that clear and unambiguous language in the policy excluded ATVs from the term “uninsured motorist.”
(9-0)

Barnett v. State, 2023-KA-00742-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction for sale of meth, holding that the trial court committed reversible error by giving a jury instruction that improperly commented on the weight of the evidence.
(7-2: Randolph dissented, joined by Branning)

N0te – Here is the text of the jury instruction that warranted reversal:

Robinson v. State, 2023-KA-00773-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, and rejecting the appellant’s pro se arguments that his appellate counsel were ineffective, that the State committed Brady violations, and that the trial court lacked jurisdiction.
(9-0)

Kendrick v. State, 2024-KM-00510-SCT (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision affirming the county court’s decision affirming a municipal court conviction of DUI first offense and possession of drug paraphernalia, holding that the county court did not err in denying a motion to suppress that claimed the traffic stop was illegal.
(8-0: Randolph did not participate)

Other Orders

In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (granting motion to amend M.R.C.P. 14 to be effective 30 days from the entry of the order on January 27, 2025)
In Re: Weaver, 2017-M-00527 (denying misnamed application for leave to seek post-conviction relief in the trial court, finding the application successive and frivious, and warning that future frivolous filings may result in sanctions)
Lestrick v. State, 2021-CT-01409-SCT (dismissing cert petition)
Gilmer v. Biegel, 2022-CP-00528 (denying motion for citation of contempt and sanctions and ordering payment of sanction)
Weatherly v. Weatherly, 2022-CT-00804-SCT (granting cert)
Jackson v. State, 2023-CT-00201-SCT (denying cert)
Jackson v. State, 2023-CT_201-SCT (denying pro se cert petition)
Carpenter v. State, 2023-CT-00580-SCT (denying cert)CT (denying cert)
In Re Validation of up to $27,600,000 Trust Certificates Evidencing Proportional Interests in a Lease by The Simpson County School District: Floyd v. Simpson County School Board, 2023-CA-01126-SCT (denying motion for rehearing and amended motion for rehearing)
Parker v. Stewart, 2023-CA-01257-SCT (granting motion to dismiss appeal)
Parker v. Stewart, 2023-CA-01257 (per curiam affirmance)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 28, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions yesterday and a stray opinion on Thursday of last week. Three are direct criminal appeals, one is a breach of contract/real property case, and the other is a PCR case.

Childs v. State, 2023-CA-00126-COA, consolidated with 2018-CT-00263-COA and 2011-CT-00263-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a motion for PCR, holding that it did not have subject matter over the venue claim, that there was no clear error in denying the Brady claim, and that the claimant failed to establish a claim of ineffective assistance.
(9-0: McCarty did not participate)

JLS Farm Partnership v. ’27 Break Hunting Club, Inc., 2023-CA-00434-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of hunting clubs in a suit filed against them by an adjacent farming partnership after the partnership’s deer depredation permit was revoked and the clubs opposed a new permit, holding that the trial court did not err in finding no evidence to support the partnership’s claims of breach of contract, tortious breach of contract, breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, and promissory estoppel.
(9-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Haynes v. State, 2023-KA-00861-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of manslaughter, holding that the trial court erred by denying a stand-your-ground instruction but also holding that the State presented sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.
(9-1-0: Carlton concurred in result only without writing)

Adame v. State, 2023-KA-00758-COA (Criminal – Felony)
affirming conviction of fondling, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by giving a jury instruction concerning uncorroborated testimony of a sex-crime victim.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Note – Here is the jury instruction that passed muster:

Bonus decision from January 23, 2025

Culbertson v. State, 2023-KA-00588-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of aggravated domestic violence as a violent habitual offender, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing a lesser-included offense instruction for each count, in denying a motion to exclude evidence of the defendant’s prior bad acts, or in sentencing him as a habitual offender, and that trial counsel was not ineffective for not submitting a lesser-included instruction that was not warranted.
(5-5: Barnes concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Wilson, Westbrooks, McDonald, and Emfinger)

Other Orders

Mazie v. Boozier-Mazie, 2023-CA-00470-COA (denying rehearing)
Walker v. State, 2023-CP-00787-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page – Jan. 28, 2025

Hand Down Page – Jan. 23, 2025

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 23, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two decisions today. One in an interlocutory appeal of a denial of a motion to dismiss a 1983/HIPAA suit against a hospital and the other is a termination of parental right case.

Greenwood Leflore Hospital v. Boykin, 2023-IA-00820-SCT (Civil – Other)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of the hospital’s motion to dismiss a § 1983 suit alleging that the hospital intentionally withheld the plaintiff’s medical records which in turn deprived her of access to courts by preventing her from filing a med mal suit, holding that the plaintiff’s failure to file a brief constituted a confession of reversible error and then addressing the merits and holding that the plaintiff could not use § 1983 to enforce a federal statute (HIPAA) that does not give her an individual right.
(7-2-0: Coleman concurred in part and in the result; Randolph concurred in result only)

Practice Point – File a brief.

Note – Justice Coleman’s short concurrence took issue with the Court’s decision to address the merits after finding that the failure to file a brief constituted confession of reversible error. I thought this concurrence was interesting in light of appellate courts’ occasional habit of deciding that arguments “also meritless” after deciding dispositive issues that do not reach the merits such as an argument is waived or time-barred. Here is the concurrence:

X.G.C. v. Jackson County Department of Child Protection Services, 2023-CA-00138-SCT (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision terminating parental rights, holding that the court did not err in terminating parental rights and that the record supported the Court’s finding that the statutory requirements of § 93-15-115 and § 93-14-119 were satisfied.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Black v. State, 2022-CT-01223-SCT (denying cert)
Sinquefield v. City of Ridgeland, 2022-CT-01276-SCT (denying cert)
Carr v. State, 2023-DR-00503-SCT (staying matter until April 16, 2025, to allow the State to return to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi and move to lift the stay and for any other appropriate relief)
Haley v. Brewer, 2023-CT-00571-SCT (denying cert)
McGee v. McGee, 2023-CA-00695-SCT (denying rehearing)
In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2025-AD-00001-SCT (directing the disbursement of $213,407.18 in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 21, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. There is a pair of direct criminal appeals, a pair of PCR decisions, a custody decision, and an adverse possession decision.

Burnette v. State, 2023-CP-01330-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary dismissal of PCR motion, holding that it was time-barred.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Moore v. State, 2024-CP-00150-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that it was time-barred and successive.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Grimes v. State, 2023-KA-01254-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter and sentence after remand for an evidentiary hearing on alleged juror misconduct, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that no conduct by a juror prejudiced the defendant.
(8-0: Weddle and St. Pe’ did not participate)

Adams v. Adams, 2023-CA-01041-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s custody ruling in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in applying the Albright factors and determining that it was in the children’s best interest to award sole physical custody to the mother.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Robinson v. State, 2023-KA-00575-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that in light of overwhelming evidence of guilt the defendant failed to show that his trial counsel was ineffective for introducing a recording between an officer and a witness.
(7-2-0: Barnes concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in result only without writing; St. Pe’ did not participate)

Phillips v. Forrest County Industrial Park Commission, 2023-CA-01132-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s finding that the Commission acquired title to two acres of land by adverse possession and dismissing counterclaims, holding that the Commission proved the elements of adverse possession and that as a result the appellants’ counterclaims for trespass, unlawful withholding possession, and unjust enrichment were properly dismissed.
(6-3-0: Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

None

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 16, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One is a termination of parental rights decision and the other a judicial performance case against Carlos Moore.

J.J.B. v. Monroe County Department of Child Protective Services, 2023-CA-00532-SCT (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a custody matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in terminating the mother’s parental rights where even after CPS took the children into custody the mother failed to comply with a service plan for reunification and an agreed court order.
(9-0)

Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Moore, 2024-JP-00121-SCT (Civil – Judicial Performance)
Finding that a municipal court judge’s social media posts and public comments violated the Mississippi Constitution, the canons of judicial conduct, and a memorandum of understanding between the Commission and the judge, resulting in removal from the bench and a $3,000 fine.
(8-1: King dissented, arguing that the statements at issue were protected by the First Amendment)

NOTE – Here are the two allegations of misconduct at issue. First, comments made on the Kelly Clarkson Show:

Second, a social media commentary on the Kyle Rittenhouse trial:

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 14, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. Most are direct criminal appeals. There is also a judgment versus voluntary payment case, a contempt issue in a divorce case, a disinheritance case, and an injunction case.

Seales v. State, 2023-KA-01376-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted first-degree murder, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support to conviction.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Holstein v. Nicholas, 2023-CA-00548-COA consolidated with 2023-CA-00972 (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision ordering repayment of sums paid pursuant to an Ohio judgment enrolled in Mississippi after the Ohio judgment was overturned on appeal, holding that the evidence was not sufficient to determine whether the amount paid was a voluntary payment or a compulsory payment.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Baker v. State, 2023-KA-01111-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s proposed self-defense jury instruction because there was no evidence to support it.
(8-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only; St. Pe’ did not participate.)

In the Matter of the Estate of Tate: Garfield v. Tate, 2023-CA-01262-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision disinheriting a father, holding that the father did not prove he should inherit under Miss. Code Ann. section 91-1-15(3)(d)(i).
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Gibson v. State, 2023-KA-00704-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error by allowing the defendant’s wife to testify against him and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-1-0: Lawrence concurred, joined by Barnes and joined in part by Westbrooks and Weddle; St. Pe’ did not participate)

Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00178-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault with a weapon and felon in possession, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence of a witness’s prior convictions for forgery in violation of the defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Yarbrough v. Sacred Heart Catholic School of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 2023-CA-01219-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings granting temporary and permanent injunctive relief in favor of a school, holding that there was a legally cognizable claim based on its right to take precautions necessary to minimize foreseeable risks to protect students, that the chancellor did not err in finding that there was a threat to the school, and that the chancellor did not abuse her discretion in issuing the preliminary and permanent injunction.
(8-1: Wilson dissented; St. Pe’ did not participate)

Powell v. Powell, 2022-CA-01258-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision finding the mother in contempt in a divorce matter for failing to pay her half of children’s medical bills, holding that the chancellor did not violate the judgment of divorce, that the finding of contempt was not manifest error, and the the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in any of the evidentiary rulings.
(7-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence and St. Pe’ did not participate)

Stewart v. State, 2023-KA-00461-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of armed carjacking and three counts of armed robbery, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the motion for mistrial based on improper questioning during cross-exam of the defendant’s mother because it was waived and that the improper question was cured by jury instructions and that the defendant’s Confrontation Clause rights were not violated where a police officer testified via closed-circuit TV.
(7-2-0: Barnes and Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

LaFleur v. State, 2022-KA-00500-COA (denying rehearing)
Georgen v. Estate of Brown-Barrett, 2023-CA-000344-COA (denying rehearing)
Fox v. Allen Automotive, Inc., 2023-CA-00441-COA (denying rehearing)
Patton v. State, 2023-CP-00618-COA (recalling mandate and allowing pro se motion for rehearing to proceed on the merits)
Mallard v. State, 2023-CP-01155-COA (recalling mandate and allowing pro se motion for rehearing to proceed on the merits)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 9, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion today in an interlocutory appeal from a will contest.

In the Matter of Estate of Lake: Lake v. Chesnutt, 2024-IA-00037-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the chancellor’s order striking as waived and untimely a notice of jury trial in a will contest, holding that the chancellor erred because there was no hearing on the issue and the right to jury trial was not expressly waived.
(7-0: Sullivan and Branning did not participate)

Other Orders

In Re: Rules and Regulations for Certification and Continuing Education for Court Administrators, 89-R-99020-SCT (amending the Rules and Regulations for Certification and Continuing Education of Mississippi Court Administrators)
Whiddon v. State, 2022-CT-00616-SCT (denying cert)
City of Pascagoula v. Estate of Cumbest, 2022-CT-00745-SCT (denying cert)
Doss v. State, 2022-CT-01185-SCT (denying cert)
Signaigo v. Grinstead, 2022-CT-01212-SCT (denying cert)
Jordan v. State, 2022-DR-01243-SCT (denying motion to stay mandate)
Jiles v. State, 2023-CT-00383-SCT (denying cert)
Favre v. Mississippi Dept. of Human Services, 2024-IA-00880-SCT (granting petition for expedited interlocutory appeal) (you can read the petition here)
Favre v. Mississippi Dept. of Human Services, 2024-SA-00913 (dismissing appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 7, 2025

Happy New Year! Many thanks to all who read the blog over the past year, I truly appreciate your support. But that is all the time we have for sentimentality because the Mississippi Court of Appeals wasted no time getting back in the action. There are ten opinions today and you can read my summaries below.

Poole v. State, 2023-KA-01162-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motions for directed verdict of JNOV where the defendant failed to file a motion a suppress evidence and failed to contemporaneously object to the evidence being admitted.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing, St. Pe’ did not participate.)

Everett v. State, 2024-CP-00206-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the trial court’s dismiss of a “petition for judicial review” as time-barred because it was filed two and one-half years after the petitioner had exhausted his administrative remedies.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Begnaud v. Begnaud, 2023-CA-00822-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s decisions in a divorce case, holding that the chancellor erred in failing to value guns before awarding them to one party, in failing to consider the tax consequences of receiving funds from a retirement account, and in awarding a credit for child support payments.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

In re: Harvey; Chimento v. Schwark, 2023-CA-00398-COA (Civil – Wills, Trust, & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a will contest, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the testator had capacity, that there was not abuse or suspicious circumstances giving rise to a presumption of undue influence, that there was due execution, or that the proponent overcame the presumption of revocation.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Rencher v. State, 2024-CP-00008-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit.
(6-2-0: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle and St. Pe’ did not participate)

Jones v. State, 2023-CP-01247-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because the petitioner did not obtain permission from the Mississippi Supreme Court before filing the motion.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Walker v. Mississippi State Parole Board, 2023-CP-00919-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming dismissal of petition for judicial review of MDOC decision, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Boone v. State, 2023-KA-00684-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction two counts of gratification of lust, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and that the trial court did abuse its discretion in denying a motion in limine to exclude prior bad acts testimony or in giving an instruction re: sufficiency of the unsupported word of the victim.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Mount v. State, 2023-KA-00807-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding the defendant competent to stand and that the verdict was not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence regarding his sanity at the time of the offense.
(5-4-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Wilson v. Barnes-Wilson, 2023-CA-00945-COA (Torts – Other)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion where the plaintiff took no action of record for two years and then failed respond to the motion to dismiss for over a year and even then only after the case was dismissed.
(7-2-0: McDonald and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; St. Pe’ did not participate.)

Other Orders

Alexander v. State, 2022-KA-00977-COA (denying rehearing)
Campbell v. State, 2022-KA-01055-COA (denying rehearing)
Galang v. State, 2023-KA-00006-COA (denying rehearing)
Howell v. State, 2023-KM-00265-COA (denying rehearing)
Wilkerson v. Allred, 2023-CA-00393-COA (denying rehearing)
Harris v. State, 2023-KA-00460-COA (denying rehearing)
Brown v. State, 2023-KA-00658-COA (denying rehearing)
Haley v. State, 2023-CP-00918-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 17, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions in what appears to be the last slate of decisions from Mississippi’s appellate courts in 2024. There are two direct criminal appeals, three PCR cases, and a $1M+ personal injury verdict.

Williams v. State, 2023-KA-00346-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not admit inadmissible hearsay by allowing an officer to testify about limited information that guided his investigation and that State did not improperly comment on the defendant’s failure to testify.
(4-4-1: McCarty dissented, joined in part by Barnes, Wilson, McDonald, and Lawrence; Westbrooks did not participate)

Parker v. State, 2023-KA-00550-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of fourth-offense simple domestic violence, holding that the trial court erred in admitting affidavits containing facts about the defendant’s prior offenses but that the error was harmless, that the trial court did not err in admitting the victim’s prior statement through her probation officer, and that because there was just one harmless error the doctrine of cumulative error did not apply.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Lawson v. State, 2023-CP-01008-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s order denying a PCR motion, holding that there was no clear error or abuse of discretion.
(10-0)

Moore v. State, 2023-CP-01147-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR mtoion, holding that the claimant did not prove that his guilty plea was involuntary or that his counsel was ineffective.
(7-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Pilot Travel Centers, LLC v. Womack, 2023-CA-00035-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming a judgment after plaintiff’s jury verdict in a slip-and-fall case where the plaintiff slipped and fell on a collapsed wet-floor sign, holding that a reasonable jury could find that the collapsed wet-floor sign constituted an unreasonably or unusually dangerous condition and that the defendant had constructive knowledge of the condition, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion denying the motion for new trial that argued that expert testimony should not have been admitted, that the plaintiff’s attorney made improper statements during closing arguments, and that the non-economic damages (that the trial court reduced from $3M to $1M) was still excessive in light of the $393,000 award of compensatory damages.
(6-2-2: Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing; Emfinger concurred in result only without writing; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes and joined in party by Westbrooks)

Practice Point – The majority and the dissent agreed that the plaintiff’s “safety expert” should not have been allowed to testify as such.

Ball v. State, 2023-CP-00890-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of the claim for PCR, holding that the claimant waived his argument that his right to be free from Double Jeopardy.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by Barnes and McDonald)

Other Orders

None.

Hand Down Page