Category: Court of Appeals

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 8, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down ten opinions today. There are a bunch of domestic relations cases, several direct criminal appeals (with some jury instruction issues), a workers’ comp decision addressing the compensability of a COVID diagnosis, and a real property case. I learned about the “fugitive dismissal rule” today and you can too.

Covin v. Covin, 2022-CA-00019-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision finding both parties to a divorce in contempt and denying both parties’ request for attorney’s fees, holding that the chancellor did not err in making a sua sponte clarification of final judgment of divorce, in finding one side in contempt for failing to refinance the marital home and remit the other side’s equitable interest within the court-ordered timeline and for not allowing the other side to retrieve personal property, or in not awarding attorney’s fees despite contempt findings.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in part and in the result sub silentio.)

Carpenter v. State, 2022-KA-00398-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction or attempted murder and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that it was not plain error to not instruct the jury on the elements of murder and that the instruction give adequately described the crime of attempted murder.
(7-3-0: Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in the result sub silentio; Westbrooks concurred in the result only sub silentio.)

NOTE – Here are the instructions at issue. S-1 read:

And S-2 read:

White v. State, 2021-KA-00818-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of jointly-tried defendants for drive-by shooting and shooting into a swelling, holding that the convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Davis v. State, 2022-KA-00573-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction for armed robbery with sentence enhancement based on the victim’s age, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for new trial based on weight of the evidence arguments or in refusing to give a lesser-included-offense instruction for simple assault.
(10-0)

Gardner v. State, 2021-KA-00886-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of first-degree murder and attempted murder, holding that the trial court did not err by not striking a jail minister for cause or by finding a child competent to testify, that the issue of limitations put on on cross-examination were waived for failure to object, and that there was no plain error in accepting the State’s jury instruction that did not contain the word “deliberate.”
(6-4-0: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result sub silentio; Greenlee and Lawrence concurred in result only sub silentio.)

NOTE – Here is the jury instruction at issue:

Davidson v. Davidson, 2022-CA-00372-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s decision related to property and debt division in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in classification of marital assets or award of equity in the marital home but the order dividing the debt incurred on a credit card was not sufficiently clear regarding the amount to divide and remanding for a proper finding as to the amount.
(9-1-0: Greenlee concurred in result only sub silentio.)

Jones v. State, 2021-KA-01375-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that the verdict was not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence and that the trial court did not err in refusing a jury instruction on the excuse of accident where the defendant never stated he accidentally fired the gun.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result sub silentio.)

West v. The Nichols Center, 2021-WC-01403-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the Commission’s finding that a nurse’s COVID diagnosis and resulting blood clot after treating COVID-positive patients was not compensable, holding that there was no lay or medical proof that the claimant contracted COVID at work.
(10-0)

PRACTICE POINT – For those of us who handle workers’ comp claims, this was an interesting footnote regarding the necessity of medical proof. I was anticipating a discussion of whether COVID falls under the statutory definition of an “accidental injury” or an “occupational disease” but this footnote explains why we didn’t get it.

Gillen v. Gillen, 2021-CA-00837-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Dismissing appeal of a contempt order in a divorce proceeding, holding that the party in contempt under the “fugitive dismissal rule” because he had absented himself from the chancery court’s jurisdiction to avoid incarceration for contempt.
(10-0)

PRACTICE POINT – Be sure to add the “fugitive dismissal rule” to your arsenal:

Tubwell v. FV-1, 2021-CP-01345-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision dispossessing the defendant of land he refused to vacate after the property was foreclosed on, holding that the circuit court had jurisdiction, that the circuit court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations and adverse possession, that the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment on the issue of the defendant’s failure to vacate the property, and that the circuit court did not err in dismissing the counterclaim without prejudice.
(3-2-5: McCarty concurred in part/in result sub silentio; Carlton concurred in result only sub silentio; Barnes, Westbrooks, McDonald, and Emfinger concurred in part/dissented in part sub silentio; Wilson concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes, and Emfinger, and joined in part by Westbrooks, McDonald, and McCarty.)

Other Orders

Lofton v. Lofton, 2021-CT-00035-COA (granting motion for supplemental attorney’s fees)

Brown v. Brown, 2021-CA-00728-COA (dismissing pro se motions for lack of jurisdiction)

Nunn v. State, 2021-KA-01371-COA (denying rehearing)

Brown v. State, 2022-CP-00069-COA (recalling mandate and granting additional rehearing time)

Hamilton v. State, 2022-CP-00069-COA (granting pro se motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing)

Parker v. MDH, 2022-WC-00552-COA (denying rehearing)

Wells v. State, 2022-KA-00707-COA (granting motion to recall mandate and reinstate appeal)

Fox v. State, 2022-KA-00988-COA (granting motion for leave to file amicus brief)

Pryer v. State, 2023-TS-00568-COA (denying motion for reconsideration)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 1, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. We have a couple of state boards and agencies decisions, one dealing with recall of a police officer’s certification and the other with a termination of a teacher and suspension of license. There is a real property case involving a church and the invocation of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine,” a direct criminal appeal, and two PCR cases.

As a housekeeping note, I have started writing “sub silentio” instead of “without separate written opinion” to indicate concurrences and dissents without separate written opinions. I am not aware of that phrase being used in that specific manner, but I think it gets the point across. This may not seem like a big deal, and it really isn’t, but the frequency with which I have been typing “without separate written opinion” has become a thief of joy for this humble blogger of case summaries.

Walters v. Board on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Training, 2022-SA-00378-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision affirming Board’s decision to recall a police officer’s processional certification, holding that the Board’s decision was not arbitrary and capricious, did not violate the former officer’s constitutional rights, and were supported by substantial evidence including evidence of unnecessary force, violations of department policies, and racist text messages.
(10-0)

NOTE– The Court also granted in part a motion from the Board to unseal the case file.

Pickle v. State, 2022-CP-00929-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision denying a motion to vacate a sentence for capital murder while committing criminal rape from 1978, holding that the petitioner was not illegally sentenced and that he was not entitled to a Miller resentencing hearing.
(8-2-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result sub silentio; Lawrence concurred in the result only sub silentio.)

Greater New Hamilton Grove Baptist Church v. Hamilton Grove Missionary Baptist Church, 2022-CA-00518-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s ruling that a deed purporting to convey real property owned by a church was invalid because it was not authorized by a resolution under section 79-11-31(1), holding that the chancellor was not deprived of subject matter jurisdiction under the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine,” that the “minutes rule” was not applicable because a church is not a public board, and the chancellor did not abuse her discretion in granting the plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint.
(10-0)

NOTE – I thought the Court’s summary of its decision on the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine was interesting:

Badger v. State, 2022-CP-00831-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of the petitioner’s third motion for PCR twelve years after pleading guilty, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the motion was time-barred and did not meet any statutory exception under the UPCCRA or any fundamental rights exception that was in effect at that time.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only sub silentio.)

Langley v. Miss. State Board of Education, 2022-SA-01024-COA (Civil – State Board and Agencies)
Affirming the BOE’s decision upholding a teacher’s termination for violations of the BOE’s standards of conduct, suspending her license for five years, and placing conditions on reinstatement, holding that the Commission’s decision as upheld by the Board and the chancery court was supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary or capricious, the Commission was authorized to suspect her license, and she was afforded due process at her hearing.
(10-0)

West v. State, 2022-KA-00432-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery and gratification of lust, both while in position of trust and authority, holding that the defendant’s sufficiency of the evidence argument was procedurally barred because it was not raised before the circuit court and that the circuit court did not commit plain error in not sua sponte declaring a mistrial.
(5-3-2: Barnes, McDonald, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result sub silentio; Greenlee concurred in part and dissented in part sub silentio; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald and Greenlee in part)

Other Orders

Wakefield v. State, 2021-KA-00187-COA (denying rehearing)

Estate of Bell v. Estate of Bell, 2021-CA-00789-COA (denying rehearing)

Anderson v. State, 2021-KA-01340-COA (denying rehearing)

McDowell v. State, 2021-CA-01381-COA (denying rehearing)

Everett v. State, 2021-CP-01415-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 25, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions today covering diverse subject matter. There is a zoning exception case, a custody case, a personal injury case considering a grant of summary judgment in a slip-and-fall case, a marital property division case analyzing whether a PSA was ambiguous, and a PCR case with a concurrence discussing Howell/Rowland I/Rowland II.

Keenum v. City of Moss Point, 2021-CA-01044-COA (Civil – Other/Zoning)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision that affirmed the mayor’s decision to approve a special exception to a zoning ordinance, holding that the decision to allow a for-profit development in a residential-zoned area under an exception for “semi-public recreational area” (which was not defined in the ordinance) was reversible error because that reading would render the prohibition against “commercial use” in the ordinance meaningless.
(8-1-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Lawrence did not participate.)

D.W.K. v. Youth Court of Lincoln County, 2019-CP-00451-COA; 2020-CP-01307-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the youth court’s denial of motions to consider new evidence two years after adjudication of abuse and neglect and placement of five minor children with their maternal aunt, holding that the youth court had jurisdiction; service of process was proper; that the youth court’s decision was not manifestly wrong or erroneous, was based on substantial evidence, and favored the best interest of the children; and that the record on appeal was sufficient.
(10-0)

Babin v. Wendelta, Inc., 2022-CA-00341-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment for a fast food restaurant in a slip-and-fall case, holding that “the record contained ample proof” of a dangerous condition where multiple witnesses including restaurant employees testified that the mat was slippery on the date of the fall and that the vestibule where the mat was located held condensation.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in result only WOSWO.)

Practice Point – I have noticed ANSI standards appearing more frequently in my practice. I suspect these two sentences will make their way into more than one brief:

Blanchard v. Blanchard, 2022-CA-00356-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancery court’s ruling based on parol evidence after finding that a Property Settlement Agreement was ambiguous, holding that the PSA was unambiguous and that it entitled the ex-husband to half of the net proceeds of the sale of the former marital home even though the ex-wife had refinanced the home.
(10-0)

Roberson v. State, 2021-CA-01182-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming order granting in part and denying in part a PCR motion, holding that the petitioner was not entitled to an exception from the statutory bars and that, in any event, there was no merit to his claim that his plea was involuntary or that his counsel was ineffective.
(6-4-0: Westbrooks, McDonald, and McCarty concurred in part and in the result WOSWO; Wilson concurred in part and in the result, joined by McDonald and McCarty and joined in part by Westbrooks.)

Note – Judge Wilson’s concurrence discussed the state of the “fundamental-rights exception” in light of the Mississippi Supreme Court in Howell overruling Rowland I and Rowland II, and noted that the Supreme Court had not squarely addressed whether the successive motions bar is substantive or procedural:

Other Orders

Buchanan v. State, 2021-CP-01069-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 18, 2023

I am declaring an end to the hiatus caused by the tree falling on my house. That war rages on, but these decisions are not going to summarize themselves. I aspire to go back and summarize the decisions handed down while I was down, but I am going to prioritize summarizing new hand downs going forward.

On Tuesday, the Court of Appeals handed down four opinions. One is an appeal of a verdict in a med mal bench trial. The other three are PCR cases, one of which yielded a 5-1-4 split.

Singing River Health System v. Brand, 2022-CA-00090-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming judgment for the plaintiff in a med mal case against a hospital after a bench trial, holding that the hospital’s vicarious liability argument was procedurally barred because it not raised at the trial court level, that the plaintiff’s experts were qualified to testify about a breach of the standard of care and cause of death and provided sufficient evidence under the “lost chance of recovery” theory, and that there was substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in result only; Lawrence did not participate.)

Tate v. State, 2021-CP-01237-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err determining that there was no evidence showing that the plea of guilt was involuntary or that counsel was ineffective.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate.)

Havercome v. State, 2022-CA-00391-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the motion was barred by the UPCCRA.
(10-0)

Love v. State, 2021-CP-01101-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of motion for PCR, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that there was a factual basis for his plea, that the please was voluntary, that the claim to withdraw his plea was time-barred, and that counsel was not ineffective.
(5-1-4: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without written opinion; Emfinger dissented, joined by Wilson, Westbrooks, and McCarty, and joined in part by McDonald.)

Other Orders

Alford v. State, 2022-KA-00025-COA (denying rehearing)

Hopes v. State, 2022-KA-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 13, 2023

I was out of town for a wedding anniversary trip on Tuesday, and then I have been playing catch-up at the office to recover from said trip, so my summaries are delayed this week. First up is Tuesday’s offering from Mississippi Court of Appeals. The COA handed down five opinions this week: a termination of parental rights case, an emancipation case, two direct criminal appeals, and an attempted appeal of a MDOC decision.

Rogers v. Kresse, 2021-CA-00914-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming termination of parental rights, holding that the chancery court did not err in finding that the natural mother had abandoned her children and that the father had not abused his discretion with regard to visitation by disallowing it, and that reunification was not in the children’s best interest.
(7-2-0: McDonald concurred in part in and the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Talley v. Talley, 2022-CA-00005-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s judgment in an emancipation proceeding initiated by a father with a counter-petition for contempt for failure to pay filed by the mother, holding that the chancellor did not err by finding that the children were emancipated while not modifying the life insurance provision of the divorce agreement, finding the father in contempt for failing to pay his portion of certain expenses, and awarding the mother attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Barnes did not participate.)

Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00331-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of selling fentanyl and trafficking and possession of controlled substances while possessing a firearm, holding that the circuit court did not err in admitting text messages into evidence on authentication, relevance, or hearsay grounds.
(7-3-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Wallace v. State, 2022-KA-00332-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s request for a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction or by allowing testimony related to injuries the victim suffered a week before her death.
(9-0: Smith did not participate.)

NOTE– I love it when opinions cut to the chase. Introductions like this would just about put me out of business around here:

Knight v. State, 2021-CP-01192-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the appeal of a purported PCR motion was untimely and because it was actually a petition seeking judicial review of an MDOC decision it was a civil appeal for which the Court could not suspend the rules to allow an untimely appeal.
(10-0)

Other Orders

McKenzie v. State, 2012-KA-00471-COA (dismissing untimely motion for rehearing)

Thomas v. State, 2021-CP-00060-COA (denying rehearing)

Pace v. State, 2022-KA-00046-COA (denying rehearing)

Jones v. State, 2023-TS-00325-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)

Bates v. State, 2023-TS-00356-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as timely based on well-taken pro se show-cause response)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 6, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. One is an appeal from a DOR assessment, one is a case seeking to set aside warranty deeds over alleged undue influence, one is a direct criminal appeal, and the other three are PCR. No appellant prevailed today.

Toolpushers Supply Co. v. Mississippi Department of Revenue, 2021-SA-01186-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming summary judgment that affirmed the DOR’s assessment for unpaid retail sales tax, penalties, and interest, holding that there was no genuine issue of material fact about the sales at issue being “retail sales” as opposed to “wholesale sales.”
(10-0)

Holcombe v. Estate of King, 2021-CA-01234-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor ‘s ruling in a case seeking to set aside warranty deeds because of alleged undue influence, holding that that the factors of a confidential relationship were not established by clear and convincing proof.
(10-0)

Hill v. State, 2022-KA-00524-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that the trial court properly refused the defendant’s lesser-included-offense instruction of heat-of-passion manslaughter, that the indictment was not defective or constructively amended, and that the right to a speedy trial was not violated.
(9-0: Smith did not participate.)

Hamilton v. State, 2022-CP-00217-COA (Civil – PCR) (consolidated with Hamilton v. State, 2022-CP-00218-COA)
Affirming denial of the petitioner’s third and fourth motions for PCR, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the motions were time-barred, successive, barred by res judicata, and without merit.
(10-0)

Winston v. State, 2022-CA-00747-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a PCR motion, holding that the petitioner lacked standing to file a PCR motion and that the petition was time-barred.
(10-0)

Varnado v. State, 2021-CP-01073-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a pro se PCR motion, holding that the petitioner failed to present sufficient evidence that his guilty plea was involuntary, that he was misinformed concerning eligibility for release, that his trial counsel was ineffective, or that there was prosecutorial misconduct.
(6-1-3: Carlton dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty; Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Other Orders

West Jasper Consolidated School District v. Rogers, 2021-CA-00171-COA (denying rehearing)

Hathorne v. State, 2021-CA-00306-COA (denying rehearing)

Kirk v. State, 2021-KA-00733-COA (denying rehearing)/

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 30, 2023

I was out of the office all day yesterday for a deposition in Gulfport (photographic evidence, infra), so I am late posting yesterday’s decisions. There were two opinions from the Mississippi Court of Appeals yesterday. One is a direct criminal appeal of a guilty verdict that was reached after the original verdict was reversed and remanded for retrial. The other is a civil expungement case with some interesting procedural history.

Beasley v. State, 2021-KA-00948-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of capital murder and two counts of second-degree murder, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that the Weathersby rule did not apply so trial counsel was not deficient for failing to request an instruction or directed verdict on that basis.
(9-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

NOTE – This was the defendant’s second trial and the jury reached the same result: guilty of one count of capital murder and two counts of second-degree murder. The judgment on the first verdict was reversed because the Court of Appeals held that the trial court committed reversible error when it denied the defendant’s request for a circumstantial evidence jury instruction.

Tran v. State, 2022-CP-00094-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming denial of petition for expungement, holding that the trial court correctly ruled that the petitioner was not eligible for expungement because five years had not elapsed since the petitioner completed the terms and conditions of his sentence.
(7-3: Wilson, Lawrence, and Emfinger concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

NOTE – The second footnote in this opinion caught my eye. The petitioner filed a PCR motion in 2010 which was dismissed because he was no longer incarcerated. The COA affirmed that dismissal. The Mississippi Supreme Court overruled later overruled that decision of the COA. In yesterday’s opinion, the COA had this to say about it:

Other Order

Pitts v. State, 2021-KA-00740-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 23, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions today in five different areas of law: custody, PCR, wills and estates, criminal, and personal injury.

Culver v. Culver, 2021-CA-01108-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s ruling changing physical custody from the mother to the father, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding an impending move out-of-state would constitute a material change in circumstances that would adversely impact the children’s welfare and that the chancellor’s analysis of the Albright factors was not manifestly wrong.
(6-3-0: Wilson, Westbrooks, and McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Lawrence did not participate.)

Brown v. State, 2022-CP-00069-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the ineffective assistance of counsel claims were untimely, barred as successive, and precluded by res judicata; the circuit court was not required to grant the plaintiff’s MSJ or find the State in contempt for not responding to it; and the circuit court was not obligated to conduct an evidentiary hearing.
(10-0)

Roosa v. Roosa, 2022-CA-00128-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s estate orders in a 15-year-long legal saga over the estate of an astronaut, holding that the challenging beneficiary (1) waived the argument that the executor did not have authority to donate property to a foundation and (2) did not secure a ruling from the chancellor on the issue of whether the donation met the requirements of a valid inter vivos gift.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Practice Point – This decisions is a good reminder that you have to get a ruling from the trial court on an issue before you can appeal the issue:

Trest v. State, 2021-KA-00968-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of molestation, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence of prior bad acts (of molestation) or denying a mistrial when the witness to the prior molestation said that the defendant had molested “us” or by admitting evidence under the tender-years exception, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
(8-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Rhodes v. RL Stratton Properties LLC, 2022-CA-00338-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a building owner in a suit filed by a roofer who fell through a framed opening in the attic floor while looking for the source of water leaks, holding that the failure to warn an experienced roofer claim failed as a matter of law and that the fall through the opening was “intimately connected” to the work the plaintiff was hired to do.
(10-0)

Other Orders

Obert v. AABC Property Management, LLC, 2021-CA-00612-COA (denying rehearing)

Colenberg v. State, 2021-CA-00673-COA (denying rehearing)

Smith v. Minier, 2021-CA_01284-COA (denying rehearing)

Mallard v. State, 2022-CA-00152-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 16, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. There are three direct criminal appeals today and one is a reversal. There is also a termination of parental rights case, an adverse possession case, a PERS appeal, and two PCR cases.

Johnson v. State, 2022-KA-00465-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the circuit court did not err in refusing a lesser-included heat-of-passion instruction.
(10-0)

Carroll v. State, 2021-CP-00959-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of motion requesting the circuit court to clarify a sentence, holding that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to hear the claim because the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.
(9-1-0: Emfinger concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Adams v. State, 021-CA-01116-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the plaintiff’s claim challenging the sufficiency of evidence was not a proper ground for PCR and that the plaintiff was not entitled to a circumstantial evidence instruction.
(8-0: Westbrooks and Emfinger did not participate.)

Carter v. PERS, 2022-SA-00383-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming decisions removing two-and-a-half years of service credit, holding that the doctrine of equitable estoppel did not bar the PERS from removing the service credits and that the decision was not arbitrary and capricious.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Grimes v. State, 2022-KA-00143-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing denial of motion for new trial, holding that the defendant presented sufficient evidence of potential juror misconduct to warrant an investigative hearing, that the mutual combat manslaughter instruction was harmless error, and that the defendant’s arguments related to exclusion of evidence of the victim’s reputation in the community, hearsay in the autopsy report, medical testimony, exclusion of the victim’s toxicology report, and the scope of re-direct were not preserved for appeal.
(10-0)

Stevenson v. State, 2022-KA-00284-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding the defendant’s metal health records because the defendant did not properly assert an insanity defense.
(10-0)

Walters v. Gates, 2021-CP-01350-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming dismissal of the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and entry of judgment for possession for defendants, holding that the circuit court properly held that the plaintiff’s claim to establish title by adverse possession and cancellation of a deed should have been brought in chancery court.
(10-0)

Roach v. Phillips, 2022-CA-00159-COA (Civil – Adoption)
Reversing termination of parental rights, holding that the chancellor failed to include a summary of the GAL’s qualifications, findings, and recommendations and reasoning for not following the GAL’s recommendations and remanding for further proceedings.
(10-0)

Other Orders

Barfield v. State, 2021-KA-00660-COA (denying rehearing)

Bradley v. State, 2022-CP-00173-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 9, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine ten opinions today. There are two direct criminal appeals, a divorce case, a bad faith insurance case, an appeal of the suspension of police officers, a construction bid appeal, and two PCR cases.

Durr v. State, 2021-KA-01109-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of conspiracy to commit armed robbery, capital murder, armed robbery, and aggravated assault, holding that ineffective assistance claim based on Defendant’s representation by the same public defender’s office that represented codefendents who testified against Defendant should be dismissed without prejudice and that if there was error in admitting a codefendant’s affidavit as substantive it was harmless.
(8-2: Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald; McDonald also dissented without separate written opinion.)

Hughes v. State, 2021-CP-01241-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion to vacate PRS revocation and imposition of suspended sentence, holding that the circuit court did not err in ruling based on absconscion.
(10-0)

Sanders v. State, 2022-KA-00351-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of failing to update sex offender registration, holding based upon review of a Lindsey Brief, review of a pro se brief, and the record that there were no arguable issues that would warrant reversal.
(10-0)

Adams v. City of Jackson, 2021-CC-00454-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision affirming the suspension of two officers for engaging in a pursuit while Jackson had a no-pursuit policy, holding that the clear and substantial evidence showed that there was no “pursuit” where an officer initiated a traffic stop and followed the suspect for just over a mile at between 10-20mph.
(8-1: McDonald dissented without separate written opinion; Westbrooks did not participate.)

Davis v. Davis, 2021-CA-01246-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part a chancellor’s judgment of divorce, holding there was no error in granting divorce on the grounds of adultery but holding that the chancellor did not properly classify and value certain assets and debts and remanded for proper classification and valuations.
(8-2-0: Wilson and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

PRACTICE POINT – Make the trial court’s job easy! It is good advocacy and it is the humane thing to do.

Watkins v. State, 2021-CP-01301-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that all issues were procedurally barred and without merit.
(9-1-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Groves v. State, 2021-KA-00755-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of kidnapping and armed robbery, holding that the circuit court did not err in allowing the use of the word “victim” to describe the victim, that the claim of prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments was procedurally barred and without merit, and that the verdict was supported by substantial evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of it.
(10-0)/

Gregory Construction Services, Inc. v. Miss. Dept. of Finance and Admin., 2021-SA-00765-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming determination that a contractor’s denied construction bid was non-responsive for failing to include a one-page federal form, holding that there were no due process considerations since the plaintiff had no vested property interest in the denied bid and the agencies’ decisions were supported by substantial evidence and reasoning.
(9-0: McCarty did not participate.)

Holloway v. Nat’l Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 2021-CA-01066-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming summary judgment in a bad faith case alleging that a reservation of rights was in bad faith and caused emotional distress even though the carrier ultimately funded a settlement to secure a release of all claims against the insured, holding that the carrier had a legitimate basis for defending under a reservation of rights.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Other Orders

Liberty Nat’l Life Ins. Co. v. Hancock, 2021-CA-00605-COA (denying rehearing)

Moreland v. Spears, 2021-CA-00714-COA (denying rehearing)

Lamy v. Lamy, 2021-CA-00770-COA (denying rehearing)

Colburn v. State, 2021-KA-00865-COA (denying rehearing)

Brooks v. Jeffreys, 2021-CA-01113-COA (denying rehearing)

Nunn v. State, 2021-KA-01371-COA (recalling mandate to allow pro se motion for rehearing to proceed on the merits)

MS Concrete and Benchmark Ins. Co. v. Harris, 2022-WC-01095-COA (denying motion for rehearing of dismissal of appeal)

Hunter v. State, 2022-TS-01269-COA (granting motion for reconsideration and denying motion for appointment of counsel)

Hand Down Page