Court of Appeals – Page 7 – Mississippi Appeals Blog

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 11, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There are four divorce-related decisions, two direct criminal appeals, a tort case dismissed for failure to state a claim, a negligence case dismissed for want of prosecution, and a PCR case.

Roley v. Roley, 2022-CP-01104-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s rulings in a divorce action, holding that that the chancellor did not err in denying appellant’s Rule 60 motion that was filed after the mandate from the appeal of the case had been entered because the mandate rule barred reconsideration and that the chancellor did not err in finding the appellant in contempt or in incarcerating him for it.
(8-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Lawrence did not participate)

Clark v. State, 2023-KA-00011-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of simple possession of a controlled substance, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief, appellant’s pro se brief, and the record that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and that there were no other issues to warrant reversal.
(10-0)

Scott v. State, 2022-KA-00830-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of touching a child for lustful purposes, nine counts of sexual battery, and one count of exploitation of a child, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for change of venue because the motion to change venue was procedurally defective and lacked merit.
(9-0)

Ware v. Ware, 2023-CA-00605-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce action, holding that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion finding that the martial home was a marital asset, in distributing the marital home equally between the parties, or in not making specific findings of fact and conclusions of law as to each Ferguson factor.
(10-0)

Hasley v. Hasley, 2023-CA-00914-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s ruling that temporary orders of separate maintenance had been converted to a final order of support, holding that the order being appealed was entered while the case was previously on appeal and that the issue sub judice was encompassed in the Court of Appeals’ prior ruling and remanding for further proceedings.
(8-2-0: Barnes and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Archer v. Harlow’s Casino Resort & Spa, 2022-CP-01060-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of the pro se plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint after the initial complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to plead fraud with particularity, holding that the proposed amended complaint failed to state a claim for relief.
(10-0)

Pace v. Pace, 2022-CA-01259-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and vacating in part the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce matter related to the sale of a jointly owned commercial building, holding that the chancellor lacked jurisdiction to grant one party’s contempt motion but affirming the chancellor’s decision ordering that party to buy the other party’s interest in the property and denial of the Rule 59 motion.
(10-0)

Jiles v. State, 2023-CP-00383-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of several PCR motions, holding that they were time-barred and successive and that and no exceptions applied, and that the remaining arguments were waived because he pleaded or because he did not raise them in the circuit court.
(10-0)

Ware v. Brown, 2023-CA-00663-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal of a negligence action for want of prosecution, holding that there was a clear record of delay including two granted motions to compel and a two-year effort to obtain one plaintiff’s relevant medical history, that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the complaint with prejudice in lieu of lesser sanctions.
(5-1(2?)-3(2?): Wilson and Smith concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part; joined by McCarty and Smith; Westbrooks did not participate.)

Other Orders

Patrick v. Patrick, 2021-CA-00891-COA (denying rehearing)
Okorie v. Nat’l Ass’n Wells Fargo Bank, 2022-CP-00043-COA (denying pro se motion for reconsideration)
Marshall v. State, 2022-KA-00541-COA (denying rehearing)
Roley v. Roley, 2022-CP-01104-COA (denying motions for reconsideration and for recusal of four judges of the Court of Appeals)
Hartzog v. State, 2024-TS-00033-COA (denying pro se “motion to show cause” and dismissing appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 4, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. There is a paternity/child support case, a custody/termination of parental rights case, an MTCA personal injury case, a contract case, a slip-and-fall summary judgment, and three direct criminal appeals.

Myles v. Lewis, 2022-CA-01192-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings in a paternity action, holding that the chancellor erred in computing monthly child support by failing to account for the father’s significant income increase and personal withdrawals, inaccuracies in his financial statement, and admitted commingling of personal and business expenses; holding that the chancellor did not err in not requiring the father to pay half of the child’s private school tuition, insurance premiums, and extracurricular fees; and holding that no party was entitled attorney’s fees.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in result without writing)

Lemay v. City of Biloxi, 2023-CA-00469-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the City in an MTCA case stemming from a collision with a police officer, holding that although the trial court incorrectly ruled that the plaintiff was precluded from recovery because she was allegedly speeding, the summary judgment should affirmed because the undisputed evidence showed the officer was engaged in police protection activity and that he did not act with reckless disregard.
(7-2-0: Carlton and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence did not participate)

Hattie T. v. Matthew R., 2022-CP-00926-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s final judgment terminating parental rights, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying the mother’s motion to dismiss and that the chancellor’s decision terminating parental rights was supported by clear and convincing evidence and was in the best interests of the children.
(10-0)

Collins v. State, 2022-KA-01184-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of kidnapping, armed robbery, armed carjacking, aggravated assault, conspiracy to commit kidnapping, and conspiracy to commit armed robbery, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of other acts and crimes coupled with a limiting instruction, in excluding evidence of the defendant’s assault in prison by two witnesses, or in refusing the defendant’s instructions on lesser included instruction.
(7-2-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Terry v. State, 2022-KA-01194-COA, consolidated with Thomas v. State, 2022-KA-01278-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of two defendants (Terry and Thomas) for first-degree murder and drive-by shooting, holding that though the trial court abused its discretion in admitting surveillance video the error was harmless, that Terry’s conviction was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting text messages because they were not hearsay.
(10-0)

Designer Custom Homes, LLC v. U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies, LLC, 2023-CA-00207-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s reversal of the county court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a breach of contract case, holding that the circuit court erred by reversing on an issue and argument that were not raised in the county court or briefed on appeal and erred by finding that there was evidence in the record that presented a genuine issue of material fact.
(10-0)

Practice Point – Don’t rehash your trial court pleadings on appeal:

If the appeal process is daunting or simply pulling you away from other work you would rather do, your friendly neighborhood appellate attorney would love to visit with you about it.

Anderson v. SW Gaming LLC, 2023-CA-00345-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment for the defendant in a slip-and-fall case, holding that there was no evidence that the defendant caused water on the floor in the bathroom or that the defendant had either actual or constructive knowledge that there was water on the floor.
(10-0)

Harrera v. State, 2022-KA-01167-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of kidnapping, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, that the kidnapping instruction did not constructively amend the indictment (an issue that was procedurally barred and without merit), and that the trial court did not err by giving the State’s accomplice liability instruction.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00419-COA (denying rehearing)
Minor v. State, 2022-KA-00990-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 28, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. All are criminal law or criminal law adjacent, however there is one case discussing the form of the jury’s verdict that is more broadly applicable.

McDonald v. State, 2022-KA-01073-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Wilson v. State, 2023-CA-00070-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion for PCR, holding that the motion was untimely and that the petitioner failed to establish an exception to the time bar.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Lathan v. State, 2022-KA-00927-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming a juvenile’s conviction of second-degree murder and 40-year sentence, holding that the court did not err by accepting a verdict form that did not conform to the instructions but that nonetheless conveyed the jury’s intent in a reasonably clear manner and did not err in sentencing the juvenile because neither Jones nor Miller applied.
(10-0)

NOTE – Here is the Court’s explanation of the verdict form:

The Court also noted that the defendant did not object and that the jury was polled and that all agreed with the verdict.

PRACTICE POINT – This decision is worth reading for its succinct discussion on the form of the verdict issue. It packs a lot into two pages and may come in handy for your next big verdict form dispute.

Haley v. Brewer, 2023-SA-00571-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of an inmate’s suit protesting a facility transfer, holding that the inmate had no protected liberty interest in his housing assignment within MDOC.
(10-0)

Spralls v. State, 2023-KA-00347-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of an automobile, holding that a review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and an independent review of the record that there was no reversible error.
(10-0)

Turnage v. State, 2023-KA-00432-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress because there was substantial evidence that the police had probable cause to search his vehicle under the plain view exception or in finding the automobile exception allowed for a complete search of his truck.
(8-2-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

Hunter v. State, 2022-CP-01269-COA (dismissing untimely pro se motion for rehearing)
Gleason v. State, 2023-CP-00357-COA (denying rehearing)
Anderson v. Grabmiller, 2023-CA-00593-COA (dismissing appellee’s motion to strike appellant’s reply brief as moot after appellee’s notice of withdrawal and denying appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees and expenses)
Wilson v. State, 2023-CP-01050-COA (denying State’s motion to dsimiss and denying pro se appellant’s motion to preclude the State from filing a responsive brief)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 21, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down a bounty of twelve opinions yesterday. I noticed a stray opinion from Thursday, May 9 so that is also summarized below. With a total of thirteen opinions, there is a lot of ground covered.

Martin v. State, 2023-KA-00044-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault and armed robbery after a trial in absentia, holding that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Tilley v. Gibbs, 2022-CA-01150-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment awarding physical custody of a child to the father, holding that the chancellor did not err in his Albright analysis and that substantial, credible evidence supported the custody determination.
(10-0)

Hamer v. State, 023-CP-00701-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of relief and dismissal of PCR motion without an evidentiary hearing, holding that the PCR motion lacked sufficient support to warrant a evidentiary hearing.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

McVay v. State, 2022-KA-00523-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of four counts of capital murder and one count of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error in admitting evidence of prior bad acts during cross-examination of the defendant and holding that the defendant’s trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective for failing to object.
(7-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Carlton did not participate)

Jackson v. State, 2022-KA-01143-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and burglary and sentence to life without eligibility for early release, probation, or parole, holding that the indictment was not fatally defective; that there was no plain error in denying a motion to suppress the defendant’s statements to law enforcement where the defendant made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of Miranda; that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s proposed insanity defense and imperfect self-defense instructions; and that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Wilson and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Practice Point – This is a handy citation to tuck away for one of those “I know its true by I can’t find a case that says so” situations:

Thompson v. State, 2023-CP-00218-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of the petitioner’s fourth and fifth PCR motions, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding them time-barred.
(10-0)

Smith v. West, 2023-CA-00297-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for failure to prosecute a personal injury case, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion after granting several continuances over nearly ten years since the action was commenced.
(10-0)

Signaigo v. Grinstead, 2022-CA-01212-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings in an adverse possession action, affirming the finding that the plaintiff could not prove the ownership element but reversing the finding that title was vested in the defendant as a matter of law because that issue was beyond the scope of the motion for summary judgment.
(8-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2022-CA-01175-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s findings in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in the equitable division of marital property, in determining the amount of child support, in determining the amount of alimony, or in denying the mother’s request for attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Carr v. State, 2022-KA-00491-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the State did not commit prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments such that the court was required to intervene on its own initiative.
(10-0)

Pickens v. State, 2022-KA-00822-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of meth while in possession of a firearm, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and independently reviewing the record that there were no errors warranting reversal.
(10-0)

Hearn v. State, 2023-CP-00275-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding the motion time-barred and that no statutory exceptions applied.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

From May 9, 2024

Daniels v. State, 2022-KA-00705-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after the the defendant was convicted of one count of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, three counts of aggravated assault, and one count of shooting into an occupied dwelling, holding that indictment’s error as to the count for murder was harmless so the conviction of the lesser-included offense of manslaughter was affirmed but holding that the indictment was legally insufficient as to aggravated assault counts and that the error was compounded by repetition in jury instructions and the State’s closing arguments.
4-1*-5: Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald, Lawrence and Smith (each of whom also joined the lead opinion); Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes, Carlton, Wilson, and McCarty.)

Other Orders

Arnold v. State, 2021-KA-01426-COA (denying rehearing)
Rutland v. Regions Bank, 2022-CA-00720-COA (denying rehearing)
Malone v. State, 2022-CP-00958-COA (denying rehearing)
Boyett v. Cain, 2022-CP-00978-COA (denying rehearing)
EEECHO Inc. v. Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, 2022-SA-01068-COA (denying rehearing)
Boyette v. State, 2022-CP-01239-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 14, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions this week. There is a domestic/separate maintenance decision, a third-party assault tort case, a direct appeal of a felony conviction, and two PCR cases.

Hasley v. Hasley, 2022-CA-00908-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s decision in a separate maintenance action, holding that there was no abuse of discretion in denying the husband’s motion to dismiss the complaint but that the chancellor erred by converting the temporary orders of spousal support to a final order.
(10-0)

White v. State, 2023-CP-00200-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the circuit court’s revocation of release, holding that because the circuit judge had been the assistant DA who had prosecuted the petitioner the judge was disqualified from presiding over the revocation hearing and that this error was not harmless.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Mack v. Merimac Apartments, 2022-CA-00897-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming summary judgment in a third-party assault case against an apartment complex, holding that evidence of some crime occurring on and near the subject property was sufficient summary judgment evidence on the element of proximate cause.
(6-3-1: Barnes and Wilson concurred in part and in the judgment without writing; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Galarza v. State, 022-KA-01066-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in admitting character evidence of the defendant’s prior convictions for manslaughter.
(7-3-0: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; McCarty concurred in the result only without separate written opinion.)

Smith v. State, 023-CP-00538-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that the petitioner’s claims were procedurally barred and that there was no merit to the petitioner’s arguments that he was entitled to a bifurcated hearing at sentencing and that there was insufficient proof of his prior convictions to warrant his sentencing as a habitual offender.
(10-0)

Other Orders

Kuebler v. State, 2020-KA-00027-COA (remanding sua sponte for correction of the record)
Okorie v. National Association Wells Fargo Bank, 2022-CP-00043-COA (denying appellant’s pro se “motion to reopen case based on fraudulent settlement agreement”)
Moore v. State, 2022-KA-00327-COA (denying rehearing)
Edwards v. State, 2022-KA-00719-COA (denying rehearing)
Smith v. State, 2022-KA-00852-COA (denying rehearing)
Saddler v. State, 2024-TS-00099-COA (sua sponte allowing appeal to proceed)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 7, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down ten opinions today. They started out with a run of short and sweet 10-0 opinions and then things got more interesting. There are two split opinions on the admission of confessions, a construction contract/negligence case, a divorce decision, several more direct criminal appeals, and a couple of PCR opinions.

Johnson v. State, 2022-KA-01127-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that after a review of counsel’s Lindsey Brief and the record that there was no reversible error.
(10-0)

Carter v. State, 2023-KA-00052-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s accident instruction and that the castle-doctrine’s presumption of fear was procedurally barred and that the evidence was sufficient to show that the defendant did not act in self defense.
(10-0)

Reed v. State, 2023-KA-00248-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of hydrocodone/acetaminophen, holding that after a review of counsel’s Lindsey Brief and the record that there was no reversible error.
(10-0)

Dobbins v. State, 2023-CA-00562-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary dismissal of PCR petition, holding that the petition was statutorily barred.
(10-0)

Mac Long Homes, LLC v. Olvera Construction, LLC, 2022-CA-00938-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the circuit court’s dismissal of of a contractor’s claims against a subcontractor after the contractor lost an arbitration proceeding against the homeowner, holding that the breach of contract and negligent misrepresentation claims were time-barred, that the common-law indemnity claim was not yet ripe so dismissal without prejudice was proper, that the negligence claim was not time-barred, and that the circuit court did not err in denying the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald and McCarty; Wilson concurred in the result only without separate written opinion)

NOTE – The common-law indemnity holding here is interesting. I have been in and around the argument that crossclaims of common-law indemnity against codefendants are not proper for lack of ripeness. I expect that this opinion will be cited frequently in the future.

Hollon v. State, 2023-CP-00202-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR petition, holding that the guilty plea was voluntary and not coerced, that trial counsel was not ineffective, and that the petitioner was not otherwise entitled to relief.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Winstead, v. State, 2022-KA-01235-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death, holding that the trial court erred in admitting the defendant’s confession because it was obtained in violation of Edwards v. Arizona but that the error was harmless in light of the overwhelming weight of evidence of guilt, and holding that the trial court did not err by admitting a bloodstain card.
(6-4: Carlton concurred in part and in the result without writing; Greenlee and Smith concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Lawrence concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Carlton, Greenlee, and Smith.)

NOTE – The partial dissent took issue with the majority’s holding that the confession should have been excluded. Here is the majority’s summary of its holding on that issue:

Smith v. State, 2023-KA-00185-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery of a minor, holding that the circuit court did not err in admitting the defendant’s confession or by holding the trial in absentia.
(4-2-4: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; McCarty dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McDonald, and joined in part by Barnes and Emfinger)

Weatherly v. Weatherly, 2022-CA-00804-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in awarding sole physical custody to the mother, in awarding child support to the mother to the father despite the mother’s significantly higher income, in the valuation and distribution of marital property, in awarding the father alimony, or in denying the father’s request for attorney’s fees.
(3-2-4: McDonald and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Barnes, Westbrooks, and Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Wilson concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes, Westbrooks, and Emfinger, and joined in part by McDonald and McCarty; Smith did not participate)

City of Verona v. Moffett, 2022-WC-01050-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s finding that a former police officer sustained an 80% loss of wage-earning capacity, holding that there was substantial, credible evidence supporting the Commission’s decision that was based on evidence of physical injuries and PTSD resulting from a physical assault while the claimant was responding to a domestic violence call.
(6-1-3: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson dissented, joined by Smith and Emfinger.)

Other Orders

Silver Dollar Sales, Inc. v. Battah, 2022-CA-00476-COA (rehearing denied)
Fluker v. State, 2022-KA-00692-COA (denying rehearing)
Quinn v. State, 2022-KA-00962-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 30, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions on Tuesday. I had court in Union County that took me out of the office most of the day Tuesday. I then spent Wednesday making up for being out of the office on Tuesday, as one does. (Obligatory courthouse picture, infra.)

Taylor v. Johnson, 2022-CA-00734-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming grant of summary judgment in a car wreck negligence case, holding that there was no competent summary judgment evidence that the defendant proximately caused the collision, and then affirming summary judgment on the direct-negligence and punitive damages claims as moot.
(8-1-1: McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks dissented without writing)

Whiddon v. State, 2022-KA-00616-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, aggravated assault of a law enforcement officer, and fleeing a law enforcement officer, holding that the trial court did not err in denying motions to dismiss for lack of speedy trial, that the circuit court abused its discretion in excluding videotaped witness statements but that the error was harmless, that the court did not commit reversible error in commenting in front of the jury that a witness was “an excellent investigator,” that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-3-0: McDonald and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in the result only without writing)

Turner v. Turner, 2023-CA-00216-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing dismissal of complaint for divorce, holding that the chancellor erred by considering matters outside of the pleadings when ruling on a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) without converting it into a motion for summary judgment and providing necessary notice.
(10-0)

Suarez v. State, 2023-KA-00526-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of an occupied dwelling under circumstances likely to terrorize the occupant, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s lesser-included-offense jury instruction.
(7-3-0: Wilson, McDonald, and McCarty concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Harris v. State, 2023-CP-00227-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion following probation revocation, holding that the trial court’s failure to inquire about the petitioner’s ability to pay his fees and assessments was harmless error at most.
(10-0)

Crawford v. East Miss. State Hospital, Inc., 2022-CA-00753-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming judgment in favor of a hospital in a wrongful death lawsuit after bench trial, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the plaintiff did not prove the proximate cause element or in denying the plaintiff’s claim for the decedent’s “lifetime damages” because the estate was initially a party before being removed as a party via amendment to the complaint.
(6-2: McCarty concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks; McDonald and Smith did not participate)

Other Orders

Mississippi Dept. of Rehab. Servs v. Butler, 2022-CA-00176-COA (rehearing denied)
Harris v. Ratcliff, 2022-CA-00596-COA (rehearing denied)
Simmons v. State, 2022-KA-01260-COA (rehearing denied)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 23, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions yesterday. There is a workers’ comp case, a divorce case, a direct criminal appeal, and an MDOC appeal.

White v. The Home Depot, 2022-WC-00894-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s decisions related to alleged work injuries, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s denial of the claimant’s request to change physicians, to continue medical treatment, and to receive indemnity benefits as to the first alleged injury, and to support the Commission’s finding that the second alleged injury was not compensable under the MWCA.
(10-0)

Brecheen v. Brecheen, 2022-CA-00190-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s rulings in a divorce proceeding on direct appeal and cross-appeal, holding that the chancellor did not abuse her discretion restricting the place and condition of the father’s visits based on a history of domestic violence, using paycheck stubs from the father’s previous employment to calculate child support, classifying the father’s severance package as marital property, or allowing the father to claim the minor child for tax purposes every other year.
(10-0)

Mai v. State, 2022-KA-00798-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of fondling a child, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, that the circuit court did not err in refusing a jury instruction that was not supported by Mississippi case law, and that the defendant’s failure to obtain a ruling on his objection to the admission of Rule 404(b) waived the argument on appeal.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Clark v. McDonald, 2022-CP-01296-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming a series of affirmances of a finding that an inmate violated a rule against assault by stabbing another inmate with a shiv, holding that there was no violation of the inmate’s procedural due process rights.
(10-0)

Other Orders

MDHS v. Johnson, 2022-SA-00605-COA (denying rehearing)
Harper v. State, 2022-KA-00659-COA (denying rehearing)
Hills v. Manns, 2022-CA-00774-COA (denying rehearing)
Barefield v. Barefield, 2022-CA-00834-COA (denying rehearing)
Forrest v. State, 2022-KA-00844-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 2, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions yesterday. There was a wills and estates case that was more of an appellate procedure case, a real property contract for sale case, a direct criminal appeal, and a tort/statute of limitations case.

Brown v. Black, 2022-CA-00869-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Dismissing appeal of a chancellor’s decision awarding attorneys fees, holding that the 2021 order on attorney’s fees was final and appealable regardless of 2022 certification and that the appeal was therefore untimely.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Eaton v. Haney, 2022-CA-00656-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision requiring specific performance for sale of real property and awarding damages and attorneys fees, holding that there was a valid contract for the sale of the real property and that the fact dispute between the parties was for the chancellor to decide and that the award of attorney’s fees was within the chancellor’s discretion.
(9-1: Emfinger dissented)

Hand v. State, 2022-KA-00819-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of kidnapping and child exploitation, holding that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Pettis v. Northeast Mississippi Electric Power Association, 2022-CA-00688-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming dismissal of a negligence claim under the doctrine of res judicata and the IIED and loss of consortium claims on statute of limitations grounds, holding that the discovery rule did not apply and that any fraudulent concealment arguments were waived for failure to raise them in the trial court.
(7-1-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without written opinion, Barnes did not participate)

Other Orders

Brown v. State, 2022-KA-00446-COA (denying rehearing)

Russell v. State, 2022-KA-00447-COA (denying rehearing)

Snyder v. Estate of Cockrell, 2022-CA-00597 (denying rehearing)

Galvan v. State, 2022-KA-00655-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 26, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions on Tuesday. The case that stood out to me was Murphy v. William Carey University not because of the result but because of how the Court of Appeals discussed the Horton doctrine. The special concurrence pulled no punches.

Frazier v. State, 2022-KA-00896-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder with firearm enhancement, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction and did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the defendant to read proffered testimony from the first trial that ended with a mistrial on the first-degree murder charge.
(10-0)

Murphy v. William Carey University, 2022-CA-00379-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Reversing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in a med mal case based on lack of pre-suit notice and the statute of limitations, holding that the defendant waived those defenses by failing to pursue them while actively participating in litigation.
(7-2: Lawrence specially concurred joined by McDonald, Smith, and Emfinger, and joined in part by Wilson and Westbrooks; Greenlee dissented, joined by Carlton)

NOTE – I find the discussion of the Horton doctrine fascinating. The majority opinion and the special concurrence threw some shade at the development of the Horton doctrine and how it has been applied. The majority opinion included this statement and footnote:

The special concurrence upped the ante and sharply criticized the state of the Horton doctrine. I read the special concurrence (carrying four votes and two “in part” votes) as a challenge to the Mississippi Supreme Court to clean up the Horton doctrine:

The special concurrence concluded with this:

I am not sure this is the best “test case” for the Horton doctrine based on the facts, but I will be watching for a cert petition.

The City of Pascagoula, Mississippi v. Cumbest, 2022-CA-00745-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing on direct appeal and reversing on cross-appeal in a case over whether private property was “menace” under Miss. Code Ann. section 21-19-11, holding that the circuit court erred in reversing the city council’s determination that the property was a “menace” and finding no abuse of discretion in the circuit court’s denial of the property owner’s decision denying the owner’s motion to compel production of documents.
(5-4: Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without separate written opinion; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Wilson, Westbrooks, and McCarty; Lawrence did not participate)

NOTE – The concurrence took issue with the City making the “menace” determination based on the condition of the property before the hearing and not at the time of the hearing.

Other Orders

Friley v. State, 2021-KA-00791-COA (denying rehearing)

Smith v. Ford, 2022-CA-00255-COA (denying rehearing)

Burns v. BancorpSouth Bank, 2022-CA-00404-COA (denying rehearing)

Moore v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, 2022-CA-00555-COA (denying rehearing)

Edwards v. State, 2022-KA-00719-COA (recalling mandate and permitting pro se motion for rehearing to proceed)

Scales v. State, 2022-KA-00856-COA (denying rehearing)

Thompson v. Thompson, 2022-CA-01014-COA (dismissing motion for rehearing as untimely)

Hand Down Page