Category: Hand Down Summaries

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 10, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. All but three are direct criminal appeals. Of the six direct criminal appeals, two are reversals. On the non-criminal side of the ledger are an MDES case, a custody decision, and a tangled web of a case stemming from the sale of a log house.

Crutchfield v. State, 2022-KA-00815-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first degree murder and felon in possession of a firearm, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and that it was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Hoffman v. MDES, 2022-CC-00948-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming denial of a claim for unemployment benefits based on the COVID-19 pandemic, holding that substantial evidence supported the finding that bank statements alone did not provide sufficient evidence of self-employment income, that the claimant’s right to a fair hearing was not violated, and that the claimant was required to repay an overpayment amount.

(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Jackson v. State, 2022-KA-00009-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing murder conviction, holding that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction where the State’s case rested entirely on circumstantial evidence of motive and proximity.
(6-1-3: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without written opinion; Emfinger dissented, joined by Greenlee)

NOTE – Here is the heart of the Court’s reasoning:

Rodgers v. State, 2022-KA-00179-COA (Civil – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth but reversing conviction of conspiracy to sell meth, holding that there was insufficient evidence of the conspiracy count because the alleged co-conspirator was not aware of the alleged conspiracy.
(7-1-0: McDonald concurred in part and in result without written opinion; Westbrooks and Emfinger did not participate.)

White v. State, 2022-KA-00607-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction or armed robbery, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting the defendant’s admissions of guilt during his interrogation because the admission was freely and voluntarily made and because the probative value was not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.
(10-0)

Young v. Niblett, 2022-CA-00294-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision modifying custody and awarding sole physical custody to the father, holding that the evidence supported the chancellor’s determination that there was a material change in circumstances and holding that the chancellor’s failure to include a summary of the GAL’s qualifications along with the summary of the GAL’s recommendations was not reversible error.
(10-0)

Britt v. Orrison,  2022-CP-00165-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancery court’s dismissal of a petition for contempt, holding that the Court lacked jurisdiction to consider the issue of the appellant’s request for costs stemming from a prior appeal and that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in denying a motion to recuse, but that the chancellor erred in dismissing the petition for contempt with respect to the sale of a log house.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in result only without written opinion; Lawrence did not participate.)

NOTE – There is a lot of procedural background and litigation background in this opinion that I have not delved into.

Kirkland v. State, 2022-KA-00851-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of nine counts of touching a child for lustful purposes, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying a motion to sever and hold three different trials for each of the three victims and or in finding no discovery violation when the State did not tell the defense that one of the victims had her disclosure date tattooed on her wrist.
(8-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without written opinion; Smith did not participate.)

Bolton v. State, 2022-KA-01118-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of business burglary, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s request for a larceny instruction and that there was no error in denying the motion for new trial because the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-1: McDonald dissented without written opinion.)

Other Orders

Gussio v. Gussio, 2020-CA-00785-COA (denying motion for appellate attorney’s fees)

Manley v. Manley, 2021-CA-00700-COA (denying rehearing)

Knight v. State, 2021-CP-01192-COA (denying rehearing)

Prather v. State, 2021-KA-01416-COA (denying rehearing)

Brown v. State, 2022-CP-00069-COA (denying rehearing)

Brandi’s Hope Community Services, LLC v. Walters, 2022-CA-00188-COA (denying rehearing)

Keller v. State, 2023-TS-00901-COA (granting time to respond to show cause notice)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of October 5, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today, but do not be deceived by that stat. One of the opinions is a 100+ page decision in a death-penalty PCR case. The other is an appeal of denial a motion to compel arbitration. There is also a linked attorney-discipline case.

Galloway v. State, 2013-DR-01796-SCT (Criminal – Death Penalty – Post Conviction)
Denying motion for leave to proceed in the trial court with PCR petition, holding that (1) the petitioner failed to overcome the presumption that what trial counsel did and did not present as mitigating evidence such as the petitioner’s “true-life story” and mental health issues during the penalty phase might be considered sound trial strategy instead of ineffective assistance; (2) there was no merit to the petitioner’s claim of ineffective assistance during jury selection where counsel used no Batson challenges and an all-white jury was seated or that counsel was otherwise ineffective in voir dire; (3) there was no merit to the petitioner’s claim of ineffective assistance during guilt-innocence phase for not investigating or challenging lack of investigating/challenging the medical examiner’s testimony, in limiting the review of Defense expert’s forensic expert or failing to consult with/prepare him, in failing to assert a Miss. R. Evid. 702 pretrial challenge to the medical examiner’s testimony, or failing to object to the medical examiner’s testimony as outside the scope of the disclosed testimony; (4) there was no merit to the claim that the State corrupted the truth-seeking function of the trial by suppressing material impeachment evidence or presenting false and misleading evidence; (5) the death verdict was not unconstitutionally coerced from a holdout juror; (6) a juror’s exposure to medical coverage showing the victim violated constitutional rights; (7) a juror’s false statement during voir dire that he had not previously served on a criminal jury did not give rise to an inference of prejudice; (8) the petitioner did not show that he was prejudiced when he was placed the defendant in an electronic restraint; (9) death by lethal injection would not violate the petitioner’s rights under the Eighth Amendment or Fourteenth Amendment; and (10) there was no aggregation of errors mandating a reversal.
(9-0)

PriorityOne Bank v. Folkes, 2022-CA-00429-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming denial of motion to compel arbitration, holding that the bank waived the right to arbitration by substantially participating in the litigation and did not file a motion to compel arbitration until after an amended complaint was filed.
(7-2: Griffis dissented, joined by Beam)

PRACTICE POINT – The Supreme Court’s decision appears to hinge on the fact that the amended complained did not add a new cause of action (which was in dispute). This was enough to affirm the denial of the motion to compel arbitration, but the Supreme Court made it clear the plaintiff was bound by her representation that no new claim was asserted:

Other Orders

Jarvis v. State, 2021-M-01196 (denying application for leave to proceed in the trial court, finding the filing frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings could result in sanctions)

The Mississippi Bar v. Hessler, 2023-BD-00057-SCT (suspending an attorney from the practice of law for one year and one day, with the suspension deferred retroactively to June 22, 2022)

Wakefield v. State, 2021-CT-00187-SCT (denying cert)

Buchanan v. Hope Federal Credit Union, 2021-CT-00218-SCT (denying cert)

In Re: Resignation of Emily Bonds Davey f/k/a Emily Sides Bonds From The Practice of Law in Mississippi, 2023-BD-00963 (granting leave under Rule 11(b) of the Rules of Discipline for the Mississippi State Bar to resign in good standing from the practice of law in Mississippi)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 26, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There is something for everyone: tort, real property, divorce, direct criminal appeals, and PCR. Due to volume of paying work and COA output I had to move quickly to get these out, so I expect a higher-than-normal rate of typos.

Odom v. State, 2021-KA-00676-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of murder, holding that computer printouts of GPS and location data from Google were not properly authenticated and should not have been admitted but that the error was harmless, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting photos of a vehicle over an authentication objection, that the trial court did not err in excluding paint-transfer evidence and crime lab documents for lack of authenticity, and holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence.
(7-3: Wilson dissented without written opinion; Westbrooks dissented, joined in part by McDonald)

Practice Point – On the authenticity of Google satellite images, the Court noted that the images themselves were not hearsay, but that computer-generated data included on the photos required authentication:

Robb v. McLaughlin, 2021-CA-00672-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming a judgment after jury trial in a negligence/infliction of emotional distress/invasion of privacy/defamation/libel case stemming from the defendant posting a false ad for prostitution online with the plaintiff’s phone number, holding that the defendant’s due process rights were not violated, the proceedings were properly bifurcated into compensatory and punitive phases, the plaintiff was not required to produced expert medical testimony on her intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, the damages were not speculative, and the jury instructions were appropriate.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without written opinion.)

Practice Point– I have cited the 5th Circuit’s Krieser decisions for the proposition that settlement as to one defendant does not affect apportionment at trial–a proposition that can cut either way. It is nice to have a Mississippi Court of Appeals decision to cite (citing Krieser) for this proposition.

Alexander v. State, 2022-CA-00397-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion that argued ineffective assistance of counsel, holding that the circuit court’s decision was not clearly erroneous, legally in error, or an abuse of discretion.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without written opinion)

Bradshaw v. State, 2022-KA-00469-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that the indictment was not overly broad to the point it failed to provide sufficient notice under a plain error analysis or on the merits, that there was no violation of the right to speedy trial, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony of prior bad acts because it complied with Rule 404(b).
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate.)

Smith v. State, 2022-KA-00664-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery of a child, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the defendant’s motion for continuance because the State’s discovery violations did not result in manifest injustice, that the trial court did not commit plain error by severing the codefendant’s case without a proper motion, and that the lack of error precluded reversal for cumulative error.
(10-0)

Titus v. Stelzer, 2022-CA-01079-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s order in a suit to set aside a quitclaim deed and to confirm and quiet title, holding that the chancellor did not err in setting aside the quitclaim deed and confirming title through a prior conveyance.
(9-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without written opinion.)

Gregg v. State, 2022-KA-00485-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of amphetamine and marijuana, holding that the sole issue on appeal–ineffective assistance of counsel–should be dismissed without prejudice because the record was insufficient to address the issue on direct appeal.
(10-0)

Patel v. State, 2022-CA-00985-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion to withdraw and vacate a prior admission of guilt in a pretrial intervention after the petitioner learned that even with dismissal and expungement he was not eligible for lawful permanent residence status under the INA, holding that the circuit court properly dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate.)

Gussio v. Gussio, 2020-CA-00785-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s judgment in a divorce case granting the mother a divorce and granting her physical and legal custody of the children, holding that the chancellor did not err in the amount of child support awarded, in not imputing income to the mother, in awarding alimony, by denying the father’s motion in limine to exclude evidence of the mother’s attorney’s fees, in awarding attorney’s fees, or in denying motion to alter or amend the judgment and consider new evidence.
(5-5: Wilson concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Greenlee, Lawrence, Smith, and Emfinger.)

NOTE – Judge Wilson’s partial dissent agreed with the rulings on child support and alimony, but asserted that the award of attorneys’ fees should not be affirmed because the record and the chancellor’s findings on attorneys’ fees were insufficient. I am putting this one on my cert watchlist.

Other Orders

Lynn v. State, 2021-KA-00968-COA (denying rehearing)

Culver v. Culver, 2021-CA-01108-COA (denying rehearing)

Stevenson v. State, 2021-KA-01286-COA (recalling mandate)

Lestrick v. State, 2021-CP-01409-COA (denying motion for additional time to file motion for rehearing)

Covin v. Covin, 2022-COA-00019-COA (denying motion for appellate attorney’s fees)

Amos v. State, 2022-KA-00171-COA (denying motion for enlargement of time to file motion for rehearing)

Pickle v. State, 2022-CP-00929-COA (recalling mandate)

Rehabilitation Centers, Inc. v. Williams, 2023-WC-00453-COA (granting motion to dismiss consolidated appeals as interlocutory)

Miller v. State, 2023-TS-00812-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as timely)

Gardner v. State, 2023-TS-00903-COA (granting motion to consolidate)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of September 21, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions today. There is an estates case, a domestic relations case, and a direct criminal appeal. However, the main stage act is a decision on the constitutionality of HB 1020 (and part of that decision was unanimous).

In Re The Estate of Herbert Bernard Ivison, Jr.: Malouf & Malouf, PLLC v. The Estate of Herbert Bernard Ivison, Jr., 2022-CA-00837-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the chancellor’s ruling that a law firm’s probated claim against a state was barred by statute, holding that the law firm had no reason to pursue further additional legal actions to secure payment of its claim after timely probating the claim.
(8-0: Griffis did not participate.)

West v. West, 2020-CA-01206-SCT consolidated with 2022-CA-00147, 2002-IA-01158, 2008-CA-01700, 2009-CA-01877, 2010-CA-00316 (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversed on direct appeal and cross appeal, holding that the chancellor erred in his priority-of-liens analysis and remanding for a determination of whether capital stock certificates conspicuously noted bylaws restrictions, holding that the chancellor erred in failing to address a retroactive child support claim, and holding that because one party engaged in claim-splitting the chancellor’s decision in the consolidated case was reversed with orders to dismiss the case and reinstate a 2008 judgment, writs of garnishment, and writs of execution.
(8-0: Beam did not participate.)

NOTE – This is a 44-page opinion with a lot going on. Be advised that my summary is even broader than usual.

Jenkins v. State, 2022-KA-00754-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of DUI (third offense), holding that the trial court did not err in granting a jury instruction that the State was not required to prove that alcohol impaired the defendant’s ability to drive or level of impairment and did not err in refusing the defendant’s instruction on the defendant’s theory of the case where most of the language of that instruction was incorporated into another instruction.
(5-1*-3: Maxwell specially concurred, joined by four justices from the majority: Coleman, Beam, Chamberlin, and Griffis; Kitchens dissented, joined by King.)

NOTE – Justice Maxwell’s concurrence garnered four other votes giving it precedential effect. That special concurrence held that “an instruction like S-8’s potential to confuse weight heavily against giving it in Section (1)(a) common law DUI cases.” The concurrence also noted that even if this instruction was given in error, it would have been harmless due to the overwhelming evidence of guilt.

Here is the text of the instruction at issue:

Saunders v. State, 2023-CA-00584-SCT (Civil – Unconstitutional Statute)
Affirming in part and reversing in part in the HB 1020 case, holding (1) the creation of the CCID inferior court is Section 4 of HB 1020 is constitutional but (2) Section 1’s creation of four “temporary special circuit judges” to be appointed by the Chief Justice to “almost-four-year-terms” violates the Mississippi Constitution’s requirement that circuit judges be elected.
(6-2: Kitchens dissented as to the constitutionality of CCID inferior court, joined by King; Kitchens and King concurred as to the unconstitutionality of appointing the temporary judges; Randolph did not participate)

NOTE – Here is the crux of the reasoning behind the unanimous holding that the appointment process in HB 1020 is unconstitutional:

Other Orders

Moore v. State, 2021-M-00111 (denying application for leave to proceed in the trial court, finding the filing frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings may result in sanctions)

Hull v. State, 2022-CT-00088-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 19, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions today. There are two direct criminal appeals (including a reversal on sufficiency-of-the-evidence grounds), an appeal of summary judgment in an MTCA negligence claim, and claim by a constable for wrongful removal.

Love v. State, 2021-KA-01014-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after the defendant was convicted of capital murder, aggravated assault, and armed robbery x3, holding that the trial court did not err in denying motion to sever, in denying motion for mistrial after brief exposure of wrist restraints to the jury venire, or in refusing a Milano instruction; that the indictment for capital murder was legally sufficient and the jury instruction on that count not erroneous; and that the defendant was not placed in double jeopardy, but that the evidence was not legally sufficient to support the armed robbery conviction.
(10-0)

J&A Excavation, Inc. v. City of Ellisville, 2022-CA-00533-COA (Civil – Other) consolidated with J&A Excavation, Inc. v. Jones County, 2022-CA-00547-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision that affirmed the Board of Aldermen and Board of Supervisors, holding that the decisions were not supported by substantial evidence and were arbitrary and capricious where the plaintiff’s low bid on a public construction contract was rejected and the next-lowest bid was accepted with no record evidence regarding qualifications, reputation, or capabilities of the bidder selected.
(10-0)

Bailey v. Jefferson County Board of Supervisors, 2022-CP-00950-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision affirming the Board of Supervisors’ decision to removal a constable, holding that there was not substantial evidence to support the removal, rendering judgment in favor of the constable, and remanding for a determination of damages.
(8-1: Emfinger dissented without separate written opinion.)

Moore v. Jackson Public School System, 2022-CA-00595-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing summary judgment dismissing a negligence claim under the MTCA, holding that the circuit court erred by granting summary judgment on other grounds where the actual motion was based only on “broad legal arguments” that did not challenge the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s evidence.
(6-3: Carlton dissented, joined by Greenlee, Westbrooks, and McDonald)

Others Orders

Carroll v. State, 2021-CP-00959-COA (denying rehearing)

Ehrhardt v. State, 2021-KA-01143-COA (denying rehearing)

Jordan v. State, 2021-KA-01421-COA (denying rehearing)

In the Matter of the Estate of Roosa v. Roosa, 2022-CA-00128-COA (denying rehearing)

Rhodes v. RL Stratton Properties LLC, 2022-CA-00338-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of September 14, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion today. The issue is a battle between COVID and the rules of appellate procedure. Read on to see who won…

Gilmer v. Biegel, 2022-CP-00528-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming order denying appellant’s motion for extension under Rule 4(g) of the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure, holding the 30-day window for a motion under Rule 4(g) is “hard edged” so the trial court properly denied the motion for extension filed 50 days after the initial appeal deadline passed, and the court was without jurisdiction to suspend the rules and allow the appeal to proceed as if timely filed.
(9-0)

NOTE – The appellant argued that a severe bout of COVID and resulting “brain fog” was to blame. He argued that the notice of appeal should be accepted as timely filed, “especially in light of this Court’s COVID-19 emergency orders authorizing trial courts to exercise sound discretion in extending deadline.” But the court was not persuaded:

Other Orders

Fair v. State,  2023-M-00783 (denying application for leave to proceed in the trial court, finding it frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings could result in sanctions)

West Jasper Consolidated School District v. Rogers, 2021-CT-00171-SCT (denying cert)

In the Matter of the Estate of Biddle, 2021-CP-00513-SCT (denying rehearing)

Maxwell v. Panola County, 2021-CT-01001-SCT (denying cert)

Barber v. State, 2022-KA-00291-SCT (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 5

I was out of town last Tuesday, so I am circling back to last week’s decisions from the Mississippi Court of Appeals. The Court handed down three opinions on Tuesday. Two are direct criminal appeals and the other one is a child custody case.

Goode v. State, 2021-KA-01310-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of murder and denial of post trial motions, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting photographs of the victim and his injuries or in denying the motion for directed verdict where there was testimony from three eyewitnesses and a medical examiner, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that the trial court did not err in refusing five of the defendant’s proposed jury instructions.
(8-2-0: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result sub silentio)

NOTE – The first refused instructions was a peremptory instruction. The second was a definition of “reasonable doubt.” The third was a lesser-included instruction of heat-of-passion manslaughter which the trial court deemed forfeited when the defendant took the stand and denied shooting the victim. The fourth and fifth refused instructions were on eyewitness identifications which were properly refused because there were multiple eyewitnesses.

Urban v. Urban, 2022-CP-00195-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming judgment denying petition for modification of custody leaving the mother with full legal and physical custody, holding that the father received sufficient service for the Rule 59(e) motion which did not require a Rule 81 summons, that the chancellor did not err in finding that the mother showed a need to correct a clear legal error which the chancellor properly did, that claims of fraud by the mother and bias of the chancellor were procedurally barred, that there was no basis for the father’s claim that the chancellor admitted hearsay, that the equitable estoppel argument was procedurally barred, and that the issue of whether the chancellor should have adopted the GAL’s recommendations could not be addressed because the GAL report was not in the record on appeal.
(9-1: Barnes concurred in the result only sub silentio)

Kilcrease v. City of Tupelo, 2022-KM-00194-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Affirming the dismissal of an appeal from municipal court for lack of jurisdiction, holding that it lacked jurisdiction where the appellant failed to timely file an appearance bond to perfect her appeal to the county court.
(5-5: McDonald dissented, joined by Carlton, Greenlee, Westbrooks, and McCarty)

NOTE – The dissent first took issue with questions about whether the municipal court violated statutory and constitutional rights:

The dissent’s discussion of the timeliness of the appeal was interesting:

Other Orders

In the Matter of the Last Will and Testament of Mamie Elizabeth Pearson Bray, 2022-CA-00011-COA (denying rehearing)

Parker v. Canton Manor, 2022-WC-00206-COA (denying rehearing)

Applewhite v. State, 2022-KA-00290-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of September 7, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One is a panic-inducing civil procedure case and the other is a direct criminal appeal.

Thomas v. Bolivar County, Mississippi, 2022-CA-00445-SCT (Civil – Other)
Reversing the trial court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings in an MTCA case where the complaint was delivered to the circuit clerk on the last day of the limitations period but it was not entered into MEC until the following day (after the deadline), holding (1) when the MTCA statute of limitations falls on a Sunday, Miss. Code Ann. § 1-3-67 authorizes an extension to the following Monday; (2) delivery of the complaint, civil cover sheet, and filing fee constituted “filing” the complaint; and (3) the delay in having a summons issued did not delay the commencement date of the action.
(9-0)

PRACTICE POINT – The underlying facts of this case are nightmare fuel for civil litigators. As if the background facts weren’t enough, this part the opinion also caught my attention:

McCollum v. State, 2021-KA-01276-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of grand larceny, holding that the investigator had presented sufficient probable cause to the magistrate to justify a search warrant, that there was no hearsay admitted that would warrant reversal, and there was no error in denying a mistrial based on the presence of witness during the testimony of a State’s witness because the trial court excused the witness who violated the sequestration rule.
(7-2: King dissented, joined by Kitchens)

Other Orders

Crump v. State, 2018-M-00410 (denying application to proceed in the trial court and restricting the petitioner from filing further applications for PCR in forma pauperis)

Garcia v. State, 2021-CA-01214-SCT (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of August 31, 2023.

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today: one civil and one direct criminal appeal. The civil case addressed whether summary judgment based on 30(b)(6) testimony in a negligence case was proper. The direct criminal appeal challenged a capital murder conviction on several grounds.

Mississippi State Agencies Self-Insured Workers’ Compensation Trust v. Herrgott, 2021-SA-01280-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing summary judgment in a subrogation action filed by a workers’ compensation trust against an alleged tortfeasor stemming from an ATV accident in which a state employee sustained an injury that compensable under the MWCA, holding that the trust was not bound by the failure of its 30(b)(6) representative to articulate a legal theory at his deposition.
(9-0)

PRACTICE POINT – The Supreme Court favorably quoted a prior MS Court of Appeals decision and two decisions from federal district courts in its reasoning. The quoted language could benefit both sides of the civil bar in a few different contexts that come immediately to mind:

Dukes v. State, 2022-KA-00670-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that the trial court did not err by allowing testimony of a rebuttal witness that had not bee disclosed, or in denying a motion for mistrial based on argument that the State violated a motion in limine precluding testimony related to severed counts in the indictment, and the that trial was not rendered unfair by hearsay testimony.
(9-0)

Other Orders

In Re: Rules of Discipline for the Mississippi Bar, 89-R-99010-SCT (appointing/reappointing the following six persons to three-year terms as members of the complaint tribunals effective September 1, 2023: George Philip Schrader IV, Hon. Carol White-Richard, Hon. Jennifer F. Nicaud, Hon. Claiborne (Buddy) McDonald IV, J. Rhea Tannehill, Jr., and Leo J. Carmody)

Neal v. State, 2011-M-00201 (granting letter motion and remanding for resentencing)

Thomas v. State, 2021-CT-00060-SCT (denying cert)

Mitchell v. State, 2021-KA-00589 (denying rehearing)

Lamy v. Lamy, 2021-CT-00770-SCT (granting cert)

Pace v. State, 2022-CT-00046-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 29, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. Today was heavy on direct criminal appeals, with one reversal in part. There was also an appeal of summary judgment in a slip-and-fall case and a PCR case.

Gilbert v. State, 2021-KA-01265-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of leaving the scene of an accident causing significant bodily injury, aggravated DUI, and DUI-related death of an unborn child, holding that the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was without merit and that the prosecution did not improperly draw attention to the defendant’s exercise of his right to remain silent during closing arguments.
(10-0)

Landry v. Vallman McComb Mall, LLC, 2022-CA-00439-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a fast food restaurant in a slip-and-fall case, holding that mopping and cleaning floors in a restaurant was a reasonable endeavor and was conducted in a reasonable manner, and that the an employee provided multiple warnings.
(9-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result sub silentio.)

Lee v. State, 2022-KA-00078-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after the defendant was convicted of first degree murder, two counts of felon in possession of firearm, and tampering with physical evidence, holding (1) that the two counts of felon in possession should be merged into a single count and remanding for sentencing, (2) that excluding language from the tampering instruction that removed the element requiring intent was plain error, and (3) that retroactive misjoinder was inapplicable.
(9-1-0: Barnes concurred in part and in the result sub silentio.)

NOTE – Here is the jury instruction at issue:

Washington v. State, 2021-KA-01384-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of first-degree murder and two counts of aggravated assault, holding that the trial court’s ruling on the defendant’s Batson challenges were not clearly erroneous or against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-1*-0: Westbrooks wrote a special concurrence, joined by McDonald and joined in part by McCarty; Smith did not participate. *McDonald and McCarty joined the majority opinion and the special concurrence.)

Ellison v. State, 2022-KA-00462-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming evidence and that the trial court did not err by not removing a sleeping juror where the issue was not raised by trial counsel, and dismissing the ineffective assistance claim without prejudice.
(9-0: Smith did not participate.)

Hall v. State, 2022-CP-01097-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the motions were filed outside of the three-year statute of limitations and the petitioner did not prove that a statutory exception applied.
(7-3*-0: Westbrooks wrote a special concurrence joined by McDonald, and joined in party by Barnes and McCarty; Barnes and McDonald concurred in part and in the result sub silentio. *McCarty authored the majority opinion and joined the special concurrence.)

Other Orders

Miller v. Board of Trustees of Second Baptist Church of Starkville, 2020-CA-01384-COA (denying rehearing)

Williamson v. State, 2021-KA-00830-COA (denying rehearing)

Durr v. State, 2021-KA-01109-COA (denying rehearing)

Herbert v. Herbert, 2021-CA-01291-COA (denying rehearing)

Beckworth v. Beckworth, 2022-CA-00048-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page