Appellate Procedure – Mississippi Appeals Blog

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of December 4, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions yesterday. The most interesting is technically an adoption case, but it involves jurisdictional issues, unwritten local chancery court rules, appellate procedure, and appellate remedies. Both the majority opinion and the partial concurrence/partial dissent are worth your time.

Wiggins v. Southern Securities Group, LLC, 2024-CA-00251-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the trial court’s decision in a contract/business dispute, holding that the trial court did not err in granting one side’s motion for preliminary injunction or in denying the other side’s motion to compel mediation and/or arbitration.
(8-1: Griffis for the Court; Coleman dissented)

In the Matter of L.L.T.: Prince v. Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services, 2024-IA-00824-SCT (Civil – Adoption)
Affirming the youth court’s ruling that it lacked jurisdiction to finalize an adoption against a backdrop of the chancery court refusing set a hearing on adoption petitions, holding that the youth court did not err in finding that it lacked jurisdiction since chancery courts have exclusive jurisdiction.
(5-4: Coleman for the Court; Randolph dissented, joined by Ishee, Griffis, and Branning)

Note – The procedural posture of this one is strange as a result of the chancery court refusing to set a hearing on adoption petitions. The petitioner got creative and initiated the youth court action to create a record for an appeal so that they could seek relief from the appellate courts. The youth court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction and the petitioner was able to appeal. On appeal, the majority of the Supreme Court agreed that the youth court lacked jurisdiction but held that they could not provide any relief other than to affirm the youth court because no other relief was specifically sought. The Supreme Court made it clear that the chancery court should act, but found that it lacked a mechanism based on the issue presented on appeal to compel the chancery court to act. Here is how the majority opinion concluded:

The partial concurrence/partial dissent agreed that the youth court lacked jurisdiction, but was less diplomatic about the chancery court’s conduct and disagreed that Supreme Court’s hands are tied on this appeal:

Other Orders

McGee v. State, 2023-CT-00083-SCT (denying cert)
Childs v. State, 2023-CT-00126-SCT (denying cert)
In the Matter of Estate of Johnson: Manners v. Estate of Johnson, 2023-CT-00823-SCT (denying rehearing)
McNaughton v. State, 2023-CT-01099-SCT (denying cert)
Caffey v. Forrest Health, 2023-CT-01232-SCT (denying cert)
Carr v. State, 2024-CT-00185-SCT (denying cert)
Horne v. Dolgencorp LLC, 2024-CT-00376-SCT (denying cert)
Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2024-CT-00455-SCT (granting cert)
Rogers v. State, 2025-M-00257 (granting application for leave to proceed in the trial court)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 22, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down ten opinions today. These opinions cover personal injury, felonies, unauthorized practice of law, appellate jurisdiction, contract, and more. You can read my summaries below.

Varnado v. State, 2024-KA-00338-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of seven counts of sexual battery, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony under the Tender Years Exception, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing the State to ask a victim leading questions on direct, and that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for new trial or JNOV challenging the sufficiency and weight of the evidence.
(10-0: St. Pe’ for the Court)

Singh v. Singh, 2024-CA-00646-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the circuit court’s reversal of the county court in a garnishment dispute, holding that the county court’s decision granting a stay of garnishment was not supported by the evidence.
(9-0: St. Pe’ for the Court; Westbrooks did not participate)

Owens v. Boyd Biloxi LLC, 2024-CA-00330-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant in a slip-and-fall case, holding that the plaintiff failed to come forward with evidence that the defendant had actual or constructive knowledge of water’s presence on the floor.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Brown v. State, 2024-CA-00307-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the petition seeking permission to file an appeal nearly 15 years after conviction was time-barred and not subject to exceptions.
(9-0: McCarty for the Court; Weddle did not participate)

Quilantan v. State, 2024-CP-00357-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that there was no merit to the claim based on the absence of a PSI report, ineffective assistance of counsel, or failure to provide a certified interpreter.
(9-0: McDonald for the Court; Emfinger did not participate)

Williams v. Williams, 2023-CA-00992-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Dismissing appeal of a decision granting a divorce for lack of final, appealable judgment in a divorce case.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Rash v. State, 2023-KA-01284-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm, holding that there was no merit to the pro se arguments that the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury, that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, that the State committed prosecutorial misconduct, or that the deputy lacked probable cause or reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop that started it all.
(8-1-0: Carlton for the Court; McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks dissented without writing)

Patterson v. State, 2024-KA-00268-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the defendant’s rights to confrontation and a fair trial were not violated by the hearsay testimony where a hearsay objection was sustained and no curative instruction was sought and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Lenoire v. State, 2024-KM-00035-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Reversing conviction of practicing law without a license, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the charging affidavit, but that the circuit court’s commentary during the pronouncement of the guilty verdict created a reasonable doubt about the presumption of impartiality and amounted to plain error and that the defendant was deprived of his right to a jury trial and right to counsel.
(6-3: Barnes for the Court; Lawrence concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Carlton and Emfinger; Weddle did not participate)

Jackson v. State, 2023-KA-01280-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of three counts of trafficking controlled substances, holding that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applied where, though probable cause to support the warrant was lacking, law enforcement reasonably relied on a facially valid warrant.
(7-1-2: Wilson for the Court; Carlton concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald)

Other Orders

Roncali v. State, 2023-KA-00173-COA (denying rehearing)
Roberts v. Roberts, 2023-CA-00934-COA (denying rehearing)
Terry v. State, 2023-KA-00979-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 17 and June 24, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down a total of sixteen opinions between last week and today. You can read summaries below.

June 17, 2025

Briggs v. Jackson, 2023-CA-01241-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s judgment awarding the mother physical care, custody, and control of two minor children and granting the father visitation rights, holding that the court did not err in its Albright analysis but remanding on the issues of providing coverage of medical expenses, calculation of child support, and visitation schedule.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Mangum v. State, 2023-KA-01198-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of multiple counts of touching a child for lustful purposes and sexual battery, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s alibi instruction and did not commit plain error in admitting a memory card with photos.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Vaughn v. State, 2024-KA-00012-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of multiple counts of drive-by-shooting and shooting int a motor vehicle after review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and independent review of the record.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Hines v. PERS, 2023-SA-01400-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision affirming the PERS Board of Trustees’ decision to deny on-duty disability retirement benefits, holding that the decision was supported by supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary and capricious.
(10-0: Westbrooks for the Court)

Rodriguez v. State, 2023-KA-01159-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of manslaughter and two counts of second-degree murder, holding that the convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that there was no merit to claims of prosecutorial misconduct, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion sentencing the defendant to serve forty years on each count to run concurrently.
(9-1-0: Barnes for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result on without writing)

Other Orders

Taylor v. State, 2023-KA-00245-COA (denying rehearing)
Wallace v. State, 2023-KA-00721-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

June 24, 2025

Martin v. Martin, 2024-CA-00228-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision denying a petition for custody modification, holding that where there is no finding of an adverse impact there was no need to perform an Albright analysis and modification was not warranted.
(10-0: St. Pe’ for the Court.)

Martin v. Martin, 2024-CA-00222-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s contempt finding in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding the ex-wife in contempt of the divorce judgment and that she failed to prove her inability to comply and finding no abuse of discretion in the chancellor using contempt power of incarceration to enforce compliance.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Boyd v. Jones County, Mississippi, 2024-CA-00290-COA (Civil – Torts)
Dismissing appeal for want of final, appealable order.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Howard v. Howard, 2023-CA-01029-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s findings in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in determining equitable distribution or periodic alimony, or in failing to take into consideration supplemental security income benefits received by the minor child in determining child support.
(10-0: Westbrooks)

McHard, McHard, Anderson & Associates v. Robertson, 2023-CA-00913-COA (Civil – Eminent Domain)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in an eminent domain case, holding that the petitioner failed to prove that its proposed road was necessary.
(9-0: Carlton for the Court; Emfinger did not participate)

Dowdy v. Grayson, 2023-CA-00985-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming on direct appeal and reversing on cross-appeal, holding that the circuit court did not err in granting a directed verdict on a claim for malicious prosecution but holding that the circuit court erred in dismissing a counterclaim of fraud.
(5-2-3: Barnes for the Court; McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; Wilson dissented, joined by Lawrence and Emfinger, and joined in part by Westbrooks)

Brodie v. Brodie, 2023-CA-01397-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in reversing its initial ruling under Rule 59(e), in granting divorce on the grounds of habitual cruel and inhuman treatment, or in the division of marital property.
(9-1-0: Barnes for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Gombako-Amos v. Amos, 2023-CA-01253-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment of contempt in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the ex-wife was in contempt for failing to comply with a provision of the property settlement agreement.
(6-4: Wilson for the Court; Carlton and Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Carlton, Westbrooks, and McCarty)

Bhatti v. Board of Supervisors of Coahoma County, Mississippi, 2024-CA-00027-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of a claim to remove a bust of Ghandi from courthouse grounds, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that claim amounted to a mandamus action and that the petitioner lacked standing.
(8-1*-0: Weddle for the Court; Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald; Barnes did not participate)

Melton v. State, 2024-KM-00337-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Reversing conviction of misdemeanor child abuse, holding that the defendant did not expressly waive her constitutional right to a jury trial.
(6-4: Wilson for the Court; Emfinger dissented, joined by Carlton, Lawrence, and St. Pe’)

Heirs of Morsi v. JB Hunt Corporation, 2024-WC-00399-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s finding that a claim was not compensable, holding that the MWCC’s finding that the “found dead” presumption did not apply was supported by substantial credible evidence and was neither arbitrary nor capricious.
(6-1-3: Carlton for the Court; McCarty concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald and Lawrence)

Other Orders

Taylor v. State, 2023-CA-00738-COA (granting leave to file amicus brief)
Craft v. State, 2023-KA-00915-COA (denying rehearing)
Johnson v. Cleveland, 2023-CA-01011-COA
Foster v. Kovachev, 2023-CP-01030-COA (granting “motion regarding settlement,” dismissing certain parties to the appeal, granting in part appellees’ motion to dismiss appeal and request for sanctions and attorney’s fees, and dismissing appeal)
Blumer v. Majestic Homes, LLC, 2024-CA-00163-COA (granting motion for appellate attorney’s fees)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 13 and May 20, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions last week and a hearty eleven today. There are some interesting cases in the mix and a summary of each is below.

May 13, 2025

May v. May, 2023-CA-01022-COA, consolidated with 2023-M-01401-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Vacating the chancellor’s order of contempt for failure to pay child support but affirming his denial of the motion to recuse, holding that the chancery court did not have personal jurisdiction for purposes of a contempt ruling for want of service under Rule 81, but that although the chancellor erred in finding that the motion for recusal was untimely it was nevertheless within his discretion to deny it.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in result only without writing)

Fortner v. IMS Engineers, Inc., 2023-CA-01170-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a company that had been engaged to oversee and manage road improvement projects until about ten months before a fatal accident occurred, holding that there was no evidence that the company owed a duty of care once its involvement ended and the City took over the management role.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Carlton did not participate)

Horne v. Dolgencorp LLC, 2024-CA-00376-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a trip-and-fall case after a customer tripped on merchandise in an aisle, holding that there was no evidence that the store had actual or constructive knowledge of the presence of the dangerous condition.
(8-2: Westbrooks and McDonald dissented without writing)

Shipley v. Shipley, 2023-CA-00814-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming judgment modifying the custody arrangement by giving the mother sole physical and legal custody, holding that the chancellor did not err in modifying physical and legal custody based the mother’s relocation to Oregon, that the chancellor’s did not err by failing to consider the totality of the circumstances, that the chancellor did not give undue weight to one Albright factor, and that the argument that the chancellor erred by not sua sponte appointing a GAL to investigate allegations of abuse was procedurally barred, and declining to address child support in after ruling that the chancellor did not err in its custody decision.
(7-3: Wilson dissented, joined by Carlton and Emfinger)

Magyar v. Shiers, 2023-CA-00682-COA (Torts – Other)
Affirming bench trial decision finding the defendant liable for malicious prosecution and awarding compensatory and punitive damages, holding that there was evidence to support each element of malicious prosecution where the defendant had filed charging affidavits against the plaintiffs alleging that they were intentionally damaging his property by allowing sewage from a leaking septic system to run into his property but the justice court dismissed the charges for lack of evidence.
(10-0)

Mueller Industries, Inc. v. Waits, 2023-WC-00494-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Reversing the Commission’s decision ordering a lump sum payment, holding that the information in the record did not permit the Court to review the Commission’s computations of TPD and remanding for the Commission to determine whether TPD was properly calculated and credited, determine whether the claimant received more than the maximum weekly benefit and whether the Employer/Carrier should receive a credit for overpayment, and ensure that the Employer/Carrier was not charged with penalties or interest after the date the Commission found that no further benefits were owed.
(8-2: Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald and joined in part by McCarty)

Other Orders

Mount v. State, 2023-KA-00807-COA (denying rehearing)
Begnaud v. Begnaud, 2023-CA-00822-COA (denying rehearing)
In the Matter of Estate of Tate: Garfield v. Tate, 2023-CA-01262-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

May 20, 2025

Mask v. Baggett, 2024-CA-00181-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decisions denying a motion for contempt and attorney’s fees in a divorce action for lack of proof, holding that the chancellor’s finding that neither party had sufficient proof to support motions for contempt and attorney’s fees was supported by the record and lack of record, that the appellant failed to show that the chancellor abused his discretion by denying the Rule 59 motion due to clear error or manifest injustice.
(10-0)

Bickes v. Swain, 2024-CA-00187-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the mother of the bride and the venue in a premises liability suit filed by a wedding guest who hurt his leg stepping off a porch at the venue, holding that the circuit court did not err in granting summary judgment without conducting a hearing that had been set and that summary judgment was proper because there was no evidence of a dangerous condition that could support liability regardless of whether the plaintiff was classified as a licensee or an invitee.
(7-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Page v. State, 2024-CP-00613-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s rejection of the plaintiff’s motion for discovery in the circuit court in which he was convicted of attacking a woman with a knife two decades ago, holding that the circuit court did not err in rejecting the claim as a standalone claim separate from a PCR petition though the circuit court incorrectly “denied” the motion instead of “dismissing” the motion for lack of personal jurisdiction.
(10-0)

Jones v. State, 2023-KA-01157-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of armed robbery, holding that the circuit court did not commit plain error in excluding evidence of a witness’s prior convictions because the weight of evidence of guilt was overwhelming, that the Miranda violation arguments were procedurally barred and did not merit reversal under the plain error doctrine.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Pickett v. State, 2024-KA-00511-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of burglary of a dwelling with intent to commit a larceny, holding that the issue of the circuit court’s denial of the motions for directed verdict was procedurally barred and lacked merit because the evidence was sufficient and the verdict not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and the circuit court did not err in denying the motions without making specific findings of fact.
(10-0)

Mortera v. Kona Villa Owners Association, Inc., 2023-CA-01297-COA (Civil – Property Damage)
Reversing summary judgment that was entered in favor of an HOA that declined to pursue a property damage claim on behalf of a condo unit owner, holding that based on the bylaws and insurance policy terms there was a genuine fact dispute over the HOA’s status of a fiduciary.
(9-0)

Parrott v. Frierson, 2023-SA-01245-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s dismissal of taxpayers’ petition appealing the Board of Tax Appeals’ order, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the chancellor’s finding that “yard sales” where the taxpayers purchased storage units and sold the contents were not isolated, casual, or occasional sales but sales made in the course of business and subject to sales tax, that the chancellor did not err in finding that the MDOR’s income tax assessment was prima facie correct, that the taxpayers did not overcome the presumption of correctness, and that the chancellor properly affirmed assessment of penalties and interest.
(10-0)

Forrest County General Hospital v. Knight, 2023-WC-01277-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the Commission’s order that affirmed the AJ’s order that the claimant suffered an 80% industrial loss of use of the right leg and reducing it to 60% due to apportionment but reversed the AJ’s finding of no loss of wage-earning capacity and awarded 15% LWEC for the low back injury, holding that under the deferential standard of review there was evidence to support the Commission’s decision.
(10-0)

Roach v. Roach, 2024-CA-00236-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s denial of the ex-wife’s Rule 60(b) motion after the ex-husband was granted a divorce on the grounds of habitual cruel and inhumane treatment, holding that the chancery court did not err in finding that service of process by certified mail was proper and that the ex-wife failed to show exceptional circumstances related to her claim that her prior attorney was ineffective warranting relief under Rule 60(b).
(10-0)

Allen & Smith Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Merrill, 2023-CA-00468-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming summary judgment granted in favor of a former employee in a breach of contract claim alleging violations of a non-compete agreement, holding that the court had appellate jurisdiction even though the judgment did not include the language “no just reason for delay” and that the circuit court did not err in finding certain provisions ambiguous and striking them from the agreement.
(5-5: Carlton and Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes, and McCarty and joined in party by Carlton and Emfinger)

NOTE – I hope this one goes up on cert. My impression is that the holding of the principal opinion would relax the Rule 54(b) standard as it has been enforced. In the meantime, I would not stop putting all of the Rule 54(b) magic language in your judgments.

Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2024-CA-00455-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing summary judgment in favor of the defendant based on judicial estoppel after the plaintiff failed to disclose this personal injury claim in her bankruptcy proceedings, holding that the “acceptance” element of judicial estoppel was not met where the bankruptcy as dismissed without a discharge.
(8-2: Emfinger dissented, joined by Wilson)

Other Orders

Culbertson v. State, 2023-KA-00588-COA (denying rehearing)
Boone v. State, 2023-KA-00684-COA (denying rehearing)
Gibson v. State, 2023-KA-00704-COA (denying rehearing)
Grimes v. State, 2023-KA-01254-COA (denying rehearing)
Burnette v. State, 2023-CP-01330-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 20, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today in direct criminal appeals. One was on cert on a Confrontation Clause issue after the Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction.

Walker v. State, 2023-KA-01153-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, shooting into occupied vehicle, and felony fleeing from law enforcement, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing a proposed lesser-included-offense jury instruction as to heat of passion manslaughter, that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not commit plain error by failing to exclude a portion of the defendant’s statement, that the jury instruction conference should have been on the record by the defendant was procedurally barred from raising the issue on appeal, and that the defendant did not demonstrate that trial counsel was ineffective.
(9-0)

Practice Point – When there is no transcript available…

The opinion concluded:

Pitts v. State, 2021-CT-00740-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that the defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause were not violated where a screen was placed between a child witness and the defendant at trial.
(5-3-1: Maxwell concurred in result only, joined by Chamberlin and Griffis; King dissented)

Note – This opinion has a lengthy and detailed analysis of the Confrontation Clause.

Other Orders

Powers v. State, 2017-DR-00696-SCT (denying motion for relief under Rule 60(b)(6))
White v. The Home Depot, 2022-CT-00894-SCT (denying pro se cert petition)
Galang v. State, 2023-CT-00006-SCT (denying cert)
Corrothers v. State, 2023-CA-00401-SCT (denying rehearing)
Carroll v. State, 2023-CT-00688-SCT (denying pro se cert petition)
Toler v. State, 2023-KA-00712-SCT (denying rehearing)
In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2025-AD-00001-SCT (appointing Timothy Lewis as Deputy Marshal of the Supreme Court of Mississippi)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of December 5, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down six opinions today covering personal jurisdiction, waiver of defenses, venue, bad faith, death penalty PRC, and direct criminal appeal. There are also orders amending Rule 10 and Rule 12 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure.

Palmer v. McRae, 2023-CP-01026-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s order enforcing sureties’ liability, holding that the appellant’s arguments on appeal were waived and procedurally barred on appeal because he failed to appear or otherwise defend in the circuit court.
(8-1-0: King concurred in result only without writing)

Mississippi Department of Human Services v. Johnson, 2022-CT-00605-SCT (Civil – Other)
Reversing the chancery court’s and Court of Appeals’ decisions related to a motion to set aside a 2002 paternity order, holding that while the chancery court lacked personal jurisdiction due to insufficient service of process under Rule 81(d), the defendant waived that challenged by stipulating to the validity of the 2002 order in 2003.
(6-3-0: Randolph concurred in part and in result without writing; Griffis concurred in part and in result, joined by Maxwell and joined in part by Randolph)

Boyett v. Cain, 2022-CT-00978-SCT (Civil – Other)
Reversing the circuit court and the Court of Appeals, holding that they erred in finding that the proper venue for a prisoner to challenge an MDOC decision is the county in which the prisoner is located and clarifying that Section 11-11-3 controls and venue is proper in a county in which a defendant resides or in a county where a substantial act or even caused the alleged injury.
(9-0)

United Services Automobile Association v. Estate of Minor, 2023-CA-00049-SCT (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming a jury award of punitive damages in a bad faith claim on direct appeal but reversing the trial court’s denial of a post-trial motion for attorney’s fees, holding (1) that the trial court did not err in submitting the issue of punitive damages to the jury, (2) that the trial court did not err in submitting what he deemed to be a reasonable amount of attorney’s fees (the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ contingency fee), (3) that the $10M punitive damages award was within the Campbell guideline, (4) that trial court did not err in instructing the jury that adjusters were charged with knowledge of all records at all times, in denying the carrier’s request to depose the insured, or in excluding the insured’s bribery convictions, (5) and rendering a judgment awarding attorney’s fees of $4.5M plus post-judgment interest based on a 45% contingency fee on the punitive damages award.
(5-3: Maxwell concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Chamberlin and joined in part by Griffis; Griffis dissented, joined in part by Maxwell; Coleman did not participate)

Corrothers v. State, 2023-CA-00401-SCT (Civil – Death Penalty – Post Conviction)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the petitioner failed to prove improper juror communication.
(7-2-0: Kitchens and King concurred in result only without writing)

Mitchell v. State, 2023-KA-00859-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in instructing the jury and dismissing the ineffective assistance of counsel claims without prejudice.
(8-1-0: Ishee concurred, joined in part by Randolph and Beam)

Other Orders

In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (amending Rule 10 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure) (deleting subsection (d) that required a copy of an account or written instrument to be attached to the pleading asserting a claim founded on such)
In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (amending Rule 12 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure) (Advisory Committee Historical Notes states that was done to consistently refer to an “answer” to a counterclaim rather than a “reply”)
Landrum v. Livingston Holdings, LLC, 2022-CA-00498-SCT (denying rehearing)
Clemmons v. State, 2022-CT-00700-SCT (denying cert)
Brown v. Black, 2022-CT-00869 (denying cert)
Boyett v. Cain, 2022-CT-00978-SCT (denying motion for reconsideration)
Johnson v. State, 2023-CA-00117-SCT (denying rehearing)
Wells v. State, 2023-KA-00670-SCT (denying rehearing)
In Re: Andrew McGraw, 2024-M-00654 (denying application to proceed in the trial court, finding that the application is frivolous, and restricting the petitioner from filing further PCR applications in forma pauperis)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 2, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions yesterday. There was a wills and estates case that was more of an appellate procedure case, a real property contract for sale case, a direct criminal appeal, and a tort/statute of limitations case.

Brown v. Black, 2022-CA-00869-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Dismissing appeal of a chancellor’s decision awarding attorneys fees, holding that the 2021 order on attorney’s fees was final and appealable regardless of 2022 certification and that the appeal was therefore untimely.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Eaton v. Haney, 2022-CA-00656-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision requiring specific performance for sale of real property and awarding damages and attorneys fees, holding that there was a valid contract for the sale of the real property and that the fact dispute between the parties was for the chancellor to decide and that the award of attorney’s fees was within the chancellor’s discretion.
(9-1: Emfinger dissented)

Hand v. State, 2022-KA-00819-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of kidnapping and child exploitation, holding that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Pettis v. Northeast Mississippi Electric Power Association, 2022-CA-00688-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming dismissal of a negligence claim under the doctrine of res judicata and the IIED and loss of consortium claims on statute of limitations grounds, holding that the discovery rule did not apply and that any fraudulent concealment arguments were waived for failure to raise them in the trial court.
(7-1-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without written opinion, Barnes did not participate)

Other Orders

Brown v. State, 2022-KA-00446-COA (denying rehearing)

Russell v. State, 2022-KA-00447-COA (denying rehearing)

Snyder v. Estate of Cockrell, 2022-CA-00597 (denying rehearing)

Galvan v. State, 2022-KA-00655-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 19, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. There was a med mal case dismissed on statute of limitations grounds, an IIED verdict, an interpleader by a bank to determine the appropriate beneficiary-on-death of a CD, a zoning decision, a felony conviction, and a few PCR cases.

Jordan v. States, 2022-CP-00874-COA, consolidated with 2022-CP-00877-COA and 2023-CP-00072-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denials of three PCR motions, holding that all three motions were barred as subsequent PCR motions and that no exception to the bar was supported.
(10-0)

Jones v. State, 2022-KA-01117-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of child exploitation after the “underage female” the defendant attempted to meet up with turned out to be an undercover officer, holding that the entrapment jury instruction was properly rejected and that the convictions were not against he overwhelming weight of evidence.
(10-0)

Rogers v. NewSouth NeuroSpine LLC, 2022-CP-01036-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations and denying post-judgment motions, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion denying the pro se plaintiff’s Rule 60 motion and also denying the defendants’ motion for sanctions, damages, and fees.
(10-0)

Gray v. Johnson, 2023-CA-00339-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in an interpleader initiated by a bank over the proper “pay-on-death” beneficiary of a CD, holding that the designation was latently ambiguous but that extrinsic evidence supported the chancellor’s decision whcih was not an abuse of discretion and was not wrong or clearly erroneous.
(6-4-0: Wilson, McCarty, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Greenlee concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Jackson County, Mississippi, v. Marcellus, 2023-CA-00111-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision that had reversed the decision of the Board of Supervisors denying a request to reclassify property from residential to commercial, holding that the Board’s decision was not arbitrary and capricious that the owner had not proved a change in character and a public need by clear and convincing evidence.
(9-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Bain v. State, 2023-CP-00206-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing dismissal of PCR motion for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the petitioner did not need to obtain permission from the Supreme Court to file his petition.
(9-1-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Green v. State, 2023-CP-00448-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the motion was barred as successive and that none of the exceptions applied, and that they lacked merit.
(8-2-0: McCarty and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Weaver v. Ross, 2022-CA-00426-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming a judgment in favor of a car restorer against a man who initiated litigation by suing for alleged negligent restoration after a jury trial, holding that the trial court did not err in excluding medical records related to the owner’s blood pressure for lack of authentication and an invoice on allegedly comparative restoration, that the verdict on IIED was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the overwhelming weight of it, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees.
(6-4-0: McCarty specially concurred, joined by Greenlee, Westbrooks, McDonald, Lawrence, and Smith; Wilson concurred in part and in the result, joined by Lawrence, McCarty, and Emfinger and joined in part by Greenlee, Westbrooks, McDonald, and Smith.)

NOTE – McCarty’s special concurrence has precedential effect. You should read it for its discussion and clarification of the fact that claims for IIED cannot stem from the distress caused solely by litigation.

Wilson’s concurrence was one full vote short of precedential effect, but was joined in part by four additional judges. Wilson joined Parts I and II of the majority opinion, but parted ways over the analysis of the attorney’s fees issue. Wilson agreed the judgment should be affirmed because the challenge to the award of attorney’s fees was procedurally barred, but would have reversed if it was not barred.

PRACTICE POINT – Wilson’s concurrence contains a good reminder of the importance of reviewing the record on appeal for completeness. Don’t assume the circuit clerk included everything you designated.

Other Orders

DeJohnette v. State, 2022-KA-00249-COA (denying rehearing)

Gilmer v. State, 2022-KM-00257-COA (denying rehearing)

Hutson v. Hutson, 2022-CA-00569-COA (denying rehearing)

Daly v. Raines, 2022-CA-00600-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of September 14, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion today. The issue is a battle between COVID and the rules of appellate procedure. Read on to see who won…

Gilmer v. Biegel, 2022-CP-00528-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming order denying appellant’s motion for extension under Rule 4(g) of the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure, holding the 30-day window for a motion under Rule 4(g) is “hard edged” so the trial court properly denied the motion for extension filed 50 days after the initial appeal deadline passed, and the court was without jurisdiction to suspend the rules and allow the appeal to proceed as if timely filed.
(9-0)

NOTE – The appellant argued that a severe bout of COVID and resulting “brain fog” was to blame. He argued that the notice of appeal should be accepted as timely filed, “especially in light of this Court’s COVID-19 emergency orders authorizing trial courts to exercise sound discretion in extending deadline.” But the court was not persuaded:

Other Orders

Fair v. State, 2023-M-00783 (denying application for leave to proceed in the trial court, finding it frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings could result in sanctions)

West Jasper Consolidated School District v. Rogers, 2021-CT-00171-SCT (denying cert)

In the Matter of the Estate of Biddle, 2021-CP-00513-SCT (denying rehearing)

Maxwell v. Panola County, 2021-CT-01001-SCT (denying cert)

Barber v. State, 2022-KA-00291-SCT (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 13, 2023

I was out of town for a wedding anniversary trip on Tuesday, and then I have been playing catch-up at the office to recover from said trip, so my summaries are delayed this week. First up is Tuesday’s offering from Mississippi Court of Appeals. The COA handed down five opinions this week: a termination of parental rights case, an emancipation case, two direct criminal appeals, and an attempted appeal of a MDOC decision.

Rogers v. Kresse, 2021-CA-00914-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming termination of parental rights, holding that the chancery court did not err in finding that the natural mother had abandoned her children and that the father had not abused his discretion with regard to visitation by disallowing it, and that reunification was not in the children’s best interest.
(7-2-0: McDonald concurred in part in and the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Talley v. Talley, 2022-CA-00005-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s judgment in an emancipation proceeding initiated by a father with a counter-petition for contempt for failure to pay filed by the mother, holding that the chancellor did not err by finding that the children were emancipated while not modifying the life insurance provision of the divorce agreement, finding the father in contempt for failing to pay his portion of certain expenses, and awarding the mother attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Barnes did not participate.)

Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00331-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of selling fentanyl and trafficking and possession of controlled substances while possessing a firearm, holding that the circuit court did not err in admitting text messages into evidence on authentication, relevance, or hearsay grounds.
(7-3-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Wallace v. State, 2022-KA-00332-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s request for a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction or by allowing testimony related to injuries the victim suffered a week before her death.
(9-0: Smith did not participate.)

NOTE– I love it when opinions cut to the chase. Introductions like this would just about put me out of business around here:

Knight v. State, 2021-CP-01192-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the appeal of a purported PCR motion was untimely and because it was actually a petition seeking judicial review of an MDOC decision it was a civil appeal for which the Court could not suspend the rules to allow an untimely appeal.
(10-0)

Other Orders

McKenzie v. State, 2012-KA-00471-COA (dismissing untimely motion for rehearing)

Thomas v. State, 2021-CP-00060-COA (denying rehearing)

Pace v. State, 2022-KA-00046-COA (denying rehearing)

Jones v. State, 2023-TS-00325-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)

Bates v. State, 2023-TS-00356-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as timely based on well-taken pro se show-cause response)

Hand Down Page