The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There is an MTCA notice case, an administrative case, a real property case, a personal injury case dismissed after experts were struck, a contract case, a felony, and a few PCR cases. Read on for summaries.
Ashby v. State, 2025-CP-00076-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion for PCR, holding that the guilty plea was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent and that that ineffective assistance claims and constitutional claims were waived by pleading guilty.
(10-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)
Kirk v. State, 2024-CA-01222-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR, holding that the guilty plea was voluntary and that the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim was without merit.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)
Barnes v. City of McComb, 2024-CA-00989-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming dismissal of an MTCA wrongful death suit, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that City was not properly served with pre-suit notice.
(5-5: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson, Westbrooks, McDonald, and Emfinger dissented without writing; McCarty dissented, joined by Westbrooks, McDonald, and Emfinger, and joined in part by Wilson)
Failla v. Failla, 2025-CA-00020-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision denying a petition for prohibitive injunction regarding the placement of gate, holding that the chancellor erred in allowing the gate across land subject to an express easement.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)
Bright Beginnings Daycare III and IV v. Miss. Dept. of Human Services, 2024-SA-01008-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court dismissal of an appeal from an MDHS administrative hearing for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
(9-1-0: Wilson for the Court; McDonald concurred in result only without writing)
Harris v. Davis, 2024-CA-01018-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment after striking the plaintiff’s experts, holding that the trial court did not err in striking the expert’s report and opinions as based on speculation and conjecture, in granting summary judgment, or in denying a motion to reconsider prior order limiting discovery.
(6-4: Carlton for the Court; McDonald and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only, joined in part by McDonald and McCarty)
Turner v. City of Tupelo, 2024-CA-01146-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of a breach of contract claim and takings claim based on the statute of limitations, holding that the claims were barred by statutes of limitations (though calculating them differently than the trial court), that the ten-year statute of limitations in sections 15-1-7 and 15-1-9 did not apply, and that the trial court did not err in dismissing the case with prejudice.
(5-4: Carlton for the Court; McDonald dissented without writing; Wilson dissented, joined by McDonald, McCarty, and Emfinger; Weddle did not participate)
Brown v. State, 2024-KA-00741-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth, holding that the trial court did not err in finding the defendant competent to stand trial.
(9-1-0: Barnes for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)
Stringer v. State, 2024-CA-01247-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of PCR, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a PCR motion for new trial based on a rifle recall.
(8-1-0: Barnes for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; Carlton did not participate)
Other Orders
- Higdon v. Pinkston, 2023-CP-00685-COA (denying rehearing)
Mississippi Appeals Blog 