Tag: Confrontation Clause

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 13, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions yesterday. There was also an order dismissing an appeal as untimely based on a defect in a motion for reconsideration filed with the trial court that is worth a quick read.

Mohiuddin v. Jackson County, 2024-CA-00759-SCT (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s judgment upholding the Board of Supervisor’s approval of a special exception to a zoning ordinance, holding that the Board’s interpretation of its zoning ordinance was correct and that is decision granting a special exception was not arbitrary and capricious and was supported by substantial evidence.
(9-0: Branning for the Court)

Miller v. State, 2024-KA-00804-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding the indictment was not defective and that the defense was not prejudiced by the State’s amendment of the indictment.
(7-1-0: Griffis for the Court; King concurred in result only without writing)

Thompson v. Estate of Lee, 2025-CA-00286-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision in a claim brought against an estate by the former clients of the decedent regarding misappropriated client funds, holding that the chancellor erred in dismissing the clients’ claims where the court had previously ruled that MDL funds at issue belonged to the clients and erred in finding that the former clients were required to maintain a judgment against the decedent or his estate to recover their funds that he held in trust.
(8-1: Chamberlin for the Court; Randolph concurred in result only without writing)

Busby v. State, 2024-KA-00482-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sale of a Schedule II substance, holding that there was no Confrontation Clause violation where the trial court admitted testimony from a drug-analyst expert to testify that the substance sold was methamphetamine and admitted the law report through that expert where the expert was the technical reviewer and not the initial analyst.
(5-4: Maxwell for the Court; Coleman concurred in result only, joined by King, Ishee, and Sullivan.)

Other Orders

  • P.K. Loyacono, PLLC v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., 2024-CA-00791-SCT (granting motion to dismiss appeal from final judgment for lack of jurisdiction)

Practice Point – This Order is a cautionary tale. A “motion for reconsideration” that does not state grounds for relief does not toll the appeal deadline:

In Re: Advisory Committee on Rules, 89-R-99016-SCT (reappointing the following persons for three-year terms (1/1/26 to 12/31/28) as members of the Advisory Committee on Rules: Hon. Crystal Wise Martin, Hon. Celeste Embrey Wilson, David P. Pitre, Esq., Corey Clayton Cranford, Esq., Lance L. Stevens, Esq., and Katherine S. Kerby, Esq.)

  • Jones v. State, 2022-CT-01124-SCT (denying cert)
  • Davis v. State, 2023-CT-00811-SCT (denying cert)
  • Lee v. Doolittle, 2023-CT-00969-SCT (granting cert)
  • Phinizee v. State, 2023-CT-01090-SCT (denying cert)
  • Fortner v. IMS Engineers, Inc., 2023-CT-01170-SCT (denying cert)
  • Smith v. State, 2024-CT-00162-SCT (denying cert)
  • Underwood v. State, 2024-CT-00423-SCT (dismissing cert petition as untimely)

Hand Down Page

Double Issue: Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 29, 2025 and August 5, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions last week and nine opinions today. With fifteen total opinions, there is something for everybody. Among the summaries below is a lawsuit filed on behalf of a minor who did not make his school’s baseball team.

July 29, 2025

Soto v. Mississippi Export Railroad Company, 2024-CA-00638-COA consolidated with Loveless v. Mississippi Export Railroad Company, 2024-CA-00639-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the railroad in a car wreck case, holding that the railroad had no statutory or contractual duty to maintain traffic control devices while the road crossing the railroad was in the midst of an resurfacing project.
(9-1-0: St. Pe’ for the Court; McDonald dissented without writing)

James v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport, 2024-CA-00459-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Reversing summary judgment in a med mal case, holding that the plaintiffs’ response to the motion for summary judgment provided sufficient summary judgment proof including expert opinions and that the issue of whether a settled-defendant’s negligence was a superseding intervening act.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Strickland v. State, 2024-CP-00851-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing denial of PCR motion, holding that the indictment was void and remanding to set aside the guilty plea and for further consistent action.
(8-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Carlton concurred in result only without writing; Emfinger did not participate)

Luster v. State, 2024-CA-00014-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not clearly earr in determining that proffered testimony was not newly discovered evidence.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

West v. Gulf Relay, LLC, 2024-WC-00816-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s order, holding that substantial evidence supported the Commission’s finding that the claimant sustained an 80% industrial loss of use of his left upper extremity but apportioning that loss of use by 95%.
(9-1-: Carlton for the Court; McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Ramsey v. State, 2023-CP-00440-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding no merit to arguments that the guilty plea was involuntary and that counsel was ineffective.
(9-0: Barnes for the Court; St. Pe’ did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Jones v. State, 2022-KA-01124-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Ramsey v. State, 2023-CP-00440-COA (denying rehearing, substituting opinion)
  • 1st Step Sober Living LLC v. Cleveland, 2023-CA-00665-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Harris v. Casino Vicksburg, LLC, 2023-CA-00959-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Brooks v. State, 2023-KA-01081-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Jordan v. State, 2023-KA-01222-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

August 5, 2025

Polk v. State, 2024-KA-00591-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of sexual battery of a minor under fourteen, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sustaining a relevancy objection during cross-exam of the victim or in sustaining objections to questions about the victim’s character trait for truthfulness, and that the trial court did not commit plain error violating the Confrontation Clause.
(8-2-0: Weddle for the Court; Barnes and Westbrooks concurred in part and in the judgment without writing)

In the Matter of the Conservatorship of Bennett: Bennett v. Bennett, 2023-CA-01385-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the chancery court’s finding of criminal contempt for violation of of order prohibiting appellant from visiting his mother in an elder-care facility and distributing mass mailings about his mother and her court proceedings, holding that the finding of contempt did not violate his rights to due process, free speech, or counsel.
(8-1-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Green v. Presbyterian Christian School, Inc., 2023-CA-01278-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming motion to dismiss, holding that the parents who sued a school over their son not making the baseball team failed to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6).
(7-2-1: Westbrooks for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Emfinger concurred in result only without writing; McCarty concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Johnson v. South Central Regional Medical Center, 2023-CA-00623-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming summary judgment dismissing a med mal case for failure to designate an expert witness, holding that the trial court did not err in granting the motion that was filed three years after the complaint was filed or in denying the plaintiff’s Rule 56(f) motion.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Moyer v. Blades, 2023-CA-01180-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for failure to prosecute, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the lawsuit with prejudice under Rule 37 after the plaintiffs failed to respond to discovery for over a year and then failed to comply with a court order compelling them to respond.
(6-3-0: Wilson for the Court; McDonald and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; Barnes did not participate)

Practice Point – I though this footnote was interesting from a civil defendant’s standpoint:

Goodloe v. State, 2023-KA-00960-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of two counts of sexual batter and one count of fondling and sentencing as violent habitual offender, holding that allowing an expert to testify about the victims’ truthfulness was harmless error because the evidence of guilt sufficiently outweighed any harm caused by the admission and that the defendant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to give an opening statement.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Swims v. State, 2023-KA-01244-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second degree murder and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing the instruct the jury on the Weathersby rule, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing lay testimony about blood on the ground, and that though the trial court abused its discretion in admitting an autopsy report and in allowing testimony that simply repeated the autopsy report those errors were cumulative of admissible evidence and harmless.
(8-2: Wilson for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McCarty in part)

Knox v. Alford, 2024-CA-00442-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the trial court’s order denying a Rule 60(b) motion to alter a judgment of a dismissal for want of prosecution, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that neither the plaintiff’s motion to leave his case on the docket filed in response to the clerk’s Rule 41 notice nor his request for a trial setting was a sufficient “action of record.”
(7-3: Barnes for the Court; Lawrence concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks and McDonald and joined in part by McCarty)

Brownlee v. State, 2024-CA-00585-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing and rendering the circuit court’s decision affirming MDOC’s denial of an ARP request for a parole-eligibility date, holding that MDOC lacked authority to disregard the sentencing court’s judgment and sentence even though the sentence was contrary to statute.
(6-1-3: Wilson for the Court; McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Emfinger dissented, joined by Lawrence and Weddle)

Other Orders

  • Phinizee v. State, 2023-KA-01090-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Caffey v. Forrest Health, 2023-CA-01232-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 20, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today in direct criminal appeals. One was on cert on a Confrontation Clause issue after the Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction.

Walker v. State, 2023-KA-01153-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, shooting into occupied vehicle, and felony fleeing from law enforcement, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing a proposed lesser-included-offense jury instruction as to heat of passion manslaughter, that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not commit plain error by failing to exclude a portion of the defendant’s statement, that the jury instruction conference should have been on the record by the defendant was procedurally barred from raising the issue on appeal, and that the defendant did not demonstrate that trial counsel was ineffective.
(9-0)

Practice Point – When there is no transcript available…

The opinion concluded:

Pitts v. State, 2021-CT-00740-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that the defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause were not violated where a screen was placed between a child witness and the defendant at trial.
(5-3-1: Maxwell concurred in result only, joined by Chamberlin and Griffis; King dissented)

Note – This opinion has a lengthy and detailed analysis of the Confrontation Clause.

Other Orders

  • Powers v. State, 2017-DR-00696-SCT (denying motion for relief under Rule 60(b)(6))
  • White v. The Home Depot, 2022-CT-00894-SCT (denying pro se cert petition)
  • Galang v. State, 2023-CT-00006-SCT (denying cert)
  • Corrothers v. State, 2023-CA-00401-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Carroll v. State, 2023-CT-00688-SCT (denying pro se cert petition)
  • Toler v. State, 2023-KA-00712-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2025-AD-00001-SCT (appointing Timothy Lewis as Deputy Marshal of the Supreme Court of Mississippi)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 4, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions today: four direct criminal appeals and one PCR case. Three of the four criminal cases dealt with jury instruction issues.

Craft v. State, 2023-KA-00915-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction second-degree murder, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in giving instructions on lesser-included offenses for which the defendant was not specifically indicted, and declining to address ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal.
(8-1-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in result without writing; Carlton did not participate)

Hagan v. State, 2023-KA-00880-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing the defendant’s lesser-included-offense jury instruction.
(10-0)

Wilson v. State, 2023-CP-01050-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s order denying a PCR motions and finding that they were frivolous, successive, time-barred, and barred by res judicata.
(10-0)

Jones v. State, 2022-KA-01124-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of first-degree murder and felon in possession, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction or a proposed instruction on the defense of necessity, and finding the pro se arguments that the indictment was insufficient, that habitual offender status was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the defendant’s Confrontation Clause rights were violated during the sentencing hearing lacked merit.
(8-1-0: McDonald concurs in result only without writing; Lawrence did not participate)

Johnson v. State, 2023-KA-00870-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of felon in possession of a firearm, holding that the second felon-in-possession count did not violate double jeopardy because the weapons were acquired at different times and the search and seizure of his the defendant’s vehicle were lawful.
(9-1: McDonald dissented without written opinion)

Other Orders

  • None

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 14, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. Most are direct criminal appeals. There is also a judgment versus voluntary payment case, a contempt issue in a divorce case, a disinheritance case, and an injunction case.

Seales v. State, 2023-KA-01376-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted first-degree murder, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support to conviction.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Holstein v. Nicholas, 2023-CA-00548-COA consolidated with 2023-CA-00972 (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision ordering repayment of sums paid pursuant to an Ohio judgment enrolled in Mississippi after the Ohio judgment was overturned on appeal, holding that the evidence was not sufficient to determine whether the amount paid was a voluntary payment or a compulsory payment.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Baker v. State, 2023-KA-01111-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s proposed self-defense jury instruction because there was no evidence to support it.
(8-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only; St. Pe’ did not participate.)

In the Matter of the Estate of Tate: Garfield v. Tate, 2023-CA-01262-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision disinheriting a father, holding that the father did not prove he should inherit under Miss. Code Ann. section 91-1-15(3)(d)(i).
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Gibson v. State, 2023-KA-00704-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error by allowing the defendant’s wife to testify against him and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-1-0: Lawrence concurred, joined by Barnes and joined in part by Westbrooks and Weddle; St. Pe’ did not participate)

Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00178-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault with a weapon and felon in possession, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence of a witness’s prior convictions for forgery in violation of the defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Yarbrough v. Sacred Heart Catholic School of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 2023-CA-01219-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings granting temporary and permanent injunctive relief in favor of a school, holding that there was a legally cognizable claim based on its right to take precautions necessary to minimize foreseeable risks to protect students, that the chancellor did not err in finding that there was a threat to the school, and that the chancellor did not abuse her discretion in issuing the preliminary and permanent injunction.
(8-1: Wilson dissented; St. Pe’ did not participate)

Powell v. Powell, 2022-CA-01258-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision finding the mother in contempt in a divorce matter for failing to pay her half of children’s medical bills, holding that the chancellor did not violate the judgment of divorce, that the finding of contempt was not manifest error, and the the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in any of the evidentiary rulings.
(7-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence and St. Pe’ did not participate)

Stewart v. State, 2023-KA-00461-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of armed carjacking and three counts of armed robbery, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the motion for mistrial based on improper questioning during cross-exam of the defendant’s mother because it was waived and that the improper question was cured by jury instructions and that the defendant’s Confrontation Clause rights were not violated where a police officer testified via closed-circuit TV.
(7-2-0: Barnes and Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

  • LaFleur v. State, 2022-KA-00500-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Georgen v. Estate of Brown-Barrett, 2023-CA-000344-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Fox v. Allen Automotive, Inc., 2023-CA-00441-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Patton v. State, 2023-CP-00618-COA (recalling mandate and allowing pro se motion for rehearing to proceed on the merits)
  • Mallard v. State, 2023-CP-01155-COA (recalling mandate and allowing pro se motion for rehearing to proceed on the merits)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of September 26, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions today. There is a breach of contract case, a direct criminal appeal, and a utility rate case.

ACE American Insurance Company v. Hetsco, Inc., 2023-CA-00127-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Reversing summary judgment in a negligence action stemming from an explosion at a plant where the defendant argued that the suit was barred by a contract, holding that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the person who signed the agreement had apparent authority to bind the former plant owner to the agreement and whether the former plant owner had ratified the agreement, and that the contractually shortened statute of limitations provisions was not enforceable.
(9-0)

Howard v. State, 2022-KA-00430-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of possession of cocaine with intent to sell and conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to sell, holding that evidence was sufficient to support both convictions, that there was no Confrontation Clause violation when the trial court limited cross-examination, that acquittal on prior charges did not create a double jeopardy violation, that it was not plain error to allow testimony that a co-conspirator pleaded guilty, that there was no prosecutorial misconduct, that trial counsel was not ineffective for not seeking to remove a sleeping juror, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that no error mean that the cumulative-error doctrine did not apply.
(9-0)

Rankin County, Mississippi v. Mississippi Public Service Commission, 2022-UR-00803-SCT (Civil – Utility Rate)
Affirming the Commission’s order authorizing a rate increase for Entergy, holding that the County did not show that the Commission’s formula rate plan regulatory scheme resulted in unfair or unjust rates and that the Commission’s order was supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary or capricious.
(9-0)

Other Orders

  • White v. White, 2022-CT-00823-SCT (denying cert)
  • Tepikian v. The Mississippi Bar, 2024-BD-00588-SCT (granting leave to resign in good standing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 16, 2024

The annual July hiatus is over and the Mississippi Court of Appeals is back today with nine opinions. There are four direct criminal appeals, including one reversal of a murder conviction. There are three real property cases, one involving a partition, one an administrative condemnation decision, and the other a landowner’s right to keep horses on her property within city limits. There is also a custody modification decision and a PCR decision. (If you notice a missing tenth judge on these cases, Judge Greenlee’s retirement from the court was effective July 1, 2024.)

JDB Rentals, LLC v. City of Verona, 2023-CA-00431-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision affirming the board of aldermen decision administratively condemning three of rental properties, holding that the exclusionary rule prohibited consideration of evidence the code-enforcement officer obtained incident to an unconstitutional search of property.
(8-1-0: Carlton concurred in result only without writing)

Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00636-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and shooting into a motor vehicle, holding that the trial court did not err by not striking four potential jurors because none of the four was seated on the jury.
(8-1-0: McDonald concurred in the result only without writing)

Shanks v. State, 2023-CP-00271-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion seeking relief from a 2003 guilty plea, holding that the claims were not subject to any exception and did not involved the parole board.
(9-0)

Wade v. Simmons Erosion Control, Inc., 2023-CA-00733-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision dividing a large tract of land between two landowners, holding that the chancellor did not commit manifest error by accepting and approving a special master’s report and choosing one of the partition options presented by the special master.
(9-0)

Sinquefield v. The City of Ridgeland, 2022-CA-01276-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision that affirmed the City’s unanimous (no nays) decision that a landowner lacked the requisite acreage to maintain two horses on her property, holding that the City had to be reined in because its interpretation of the ordinance was not based on substantial evidence and was arbitrary and capricious where the owner had ponied up and acquired possessory interest in adjacent tracts.
(6-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without trotting out a written opinion; Barnes and Emfinger did not participate)

Herrington v. State, 2022-KA-00691-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record that there were no issues that warranted reversal.
(8-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Littleton v. State, 2023-KA-00239-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing the conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the circuit court erred in admitting a recorded statement of a witness where the witness was not called giving the defendant no opportunity to cross-examine the witness in violation of the Confrontation Clause, that the admission of the statement was not harmless error, and that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to give the proposed defense instruction stating the jury’s duty to acquit should it find that the defendant acted in necessary self-defense.
(6-3-0: Lawrence and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in result only without writing)

NOTE – Here is a summary of the court’s holding that the admission of the statement was error from paragraph 42 of the opinion:

Wells v. State, 2022-KA-00707-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of conspiracy to commit murder and first-degree murder, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-0)

May v. Brown, 2023-CA-00624-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s child-custody modification order, holding that substantial evidence supported the modification giving the father primary care, control, and custody of the minor.
(8-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Estate of Green v. Michini, 2022-CA-00365-COA (denying motions for rehearing)
  • Rambo v. Kelly Natural Gas Pipelines, LLC, 2023-WC-00402-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 23, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions on Tuesday. There is a workers’ comp case, a homeowner v. HOA dispute with a robust discussion of Robert’s Rules of Order, a personal injury appeal after an underwhelming verdict for the plaintiff with some significant discovery/evidentiary rulings, a tortious interference case stemming from a grocery wholesaler’s default on financial obligations, three direct criminal appeals, and a couple of PCR cases.

Kirby v. State, 2022-KA-00320-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and two counts of possession of a weapon by a felon, holding that the defendant failed to show that his trial counsel was ineffective, that the court did not abuse its discretion by limiting cross-examination of a rebuttal witness for the State, and that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence.
(10-0)

Harris v. State, 2022-KA-00647-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of touching a child for lustful purposes as an authority figure, holding that the circuit court did not commit reversible error by admitting a video recording of the defendant’s police interview after the detective had already testified about the interview, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and declining to address the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim on direct appeal.
(10-0)

Buena Vista Lakes Maintenance Ass’n, Inc. v. Jones, 2022-CA-01153-COA (Civil – HOA)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision in a homeowner v. HOA dispute over the interpretation of bylaws, holding that the bylaws were not ambiguous and that a two-thirds majority of eligible votes cast at the meeting was required as opposed to two-third majority of those eligible to vote and holding that the chancellor erred in finding that the HOA’s bad on rental properties was against public policy.
(10-0)

NOTE – Robert’s Rules of Order had a moment here.

Divinity v. Hinds Cty Sch. Dist., 2022-WC-01282-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s decision after a hearing on the merits, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that the claimant’s upper extremity complaints were not among the injuries she sustained in her work-related accident and that the Employer/Carrier was not required to pay for a spinal cord stimulator and certain prescriptions.
(9-0: Carlton did not participate)

NOTE – This was a pro se appeal and the procedural history was convoluted.

Boyett v. State, 2022-CP-01239-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a motion for PCR, holding that the motion was time-barred.
(10-0)

Duncan v. State, 2023-CP-00406-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion for PCR, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding the PCR motion moot because the petitioner had been released on parole.
(10-0)

Harris v. Ratcliff, 2022-CA-00596-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of the plaintiff’s motion for new trial or additur after the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in an amount significantly less than the plaintiff’s claimed medical expenses, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the defendant’s additional time to designate experts, in striking one of the plaintiff’s experts at trial after the expert began testifying based on notes that had not been disclosed (to the surprise of both sides), in denying the plaintiff’s request to substitute an expert for another expert who was in a coma where the plaintiff was prepared to use the expert’s video testimony at trial, or in excluding a DTI brain scan.
(7-2: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part; McCarty did not participate)

Edwards v. State, 2022-KA-00719-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted capital murder of a chancery court judge, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing testimony from two law enforcement officers regarding information they received during their investigation because it was offered for purposes other than to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Silver Dollar Sales, Inc. v. Battah, 2022-CA-00476-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict in favor of one defendant in a case stemming from a grocery wholesaler’s default on its debts to a financing company, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove that one defendant (another grocery wholesaler) committed tortious interference with business relations or that anything that defendant did proximately caused actual damages to the plaintiff.
(8-2: McDonald dissented, joined by Westbrooks)

Other Orders

In the Matter of the Guardianship of B.P.: Michael P. v. Patrick Thomas and Jennifer Thomas, 2021-CA-01288-COA (denying rehearing)

Tubwell v. FV-1, Inc., 2021-CP-01345-COA (denying rehearing)

Washington v. State, 2021-KA-01384-COA (denying rehearing)

Ramsey v. State, 2022-CP-00103-COA (denying rehearing)

Prophet v. State, 2022-CA-00933-COA (denying rehearing)

Hall v. State, 2022-CP-01097-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 18, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions on Thursday, January 18. Of the four, there were three direct criminal appeals and the fourth was an appeal in a money dispute between a county and a school district.

Douglas v. State, 2022-KA-00859-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sale of cocaine and life sentence as habitual offender, holding that the defendant waived defective indictment argument by failing to object in the trial court, that the argument that his indictment was improper because his name was incorrect was barred and without merit, that the defendant was not denied the right to represent himself because he never asked to, that the judge did not err by not recusing sua sponte, that witness credibility was for the jury to determine, that the defendant’s Fourth Amendment arguments were barred and without merit, that there was no merit to the defendant’s chain-of-custody argument, that there was no merit to the defendant’s Brady claim, that the defendant’s arguments about the amount of the controlled substance were without merit, that the defendant’s Confrontation Clause argument was barred and without merit, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the defendant’s argument that his right to a public trial was not violated where the jury deliberated and returned a verdict after business hours, and that the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim was without merit.
(9-0)

Davis v. State, 2022-KA-00696-SCT, consolidated with Jackson v. State, 2022-KA-00731-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of two counts of first-degree murder but vacating a portion of the sentences, holding that the firearm-enhancement portion of the sentences was prohibited because a greater minimum sentence (life sentence) was otherwise provided for, but holding that under the plain error doctrine there was no evidence the defendants did not receive a fair trial by an impartial jury where the Batson challenge procedure was not followed to determine if the race-neutral reason was pretextual, that the verdict supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not err in denying one defendant’s motion to server, and the cumulative errors doctrine did not require reversal.
(6-3: Kitchens dissented, joined by King and Ishee; King dissented, joined by Kitchens and Ishee)

Clarke County, Mississippi v. Quitman School District, 2022-CA-00471-SCT (Civil – Other)
Reversing on direct appeal and on cross appeal in a case about whether a school district was entitled to funds recovered by a county from the bankruptcy proceedings of a delinquent taxpayer, holding that the statutory scheme for funding public schools does not entitle school districts to receive delinquent taxes recovered years later in bankruptcy proceedings that are outside of the statutory scheme so the chancellor erred in awarding the school district a portion of the funds.
(9-0)

Stewart v. State, 2022-KA-00107-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic the trial court was within its discretion to have the defendant attend a pretrial, tender-years hearing virtually; that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence; that issues related to jury instructions were barred for failure to object and there was no plain error; and that the trial court did not err in sustaining the State’s objection to certain lines of questions while defense counsel was cross-examining witnesses.
(6-3: Kitchens concurred in result only, joined by King and Ishee)

Other Orders

In Re: State Intervention Courts Advisory Committee, 89-R-99039-SCT (approving the designation of Katharine Surkin, Director of the Administrative Office of the Courts, of Justice Robert P. Chamberlin as Chair of the State Intervention Courts Advisory Committee and the following as members through December 31, 2024: Judge Michael M. Taylor, Judge Winston L. Kidd, Judge Robert Helfrich, Judge Charles E. Webster, Judge Kathy King Jackson, Judge Randi P. Mueller, Representative Angela Cockerham, Nathan Blevins Deputy Commissioner of Community Corrections, MDOC, Mark Smith, Executive Director, State Veterans Affairs Board, Andrea Sanders, Commissioner, Miss. Department of Child Protection Services, and Consuelo Walley, Coordinator, Jones County Drug Ct, 18th Judicial Circuit, and further designating the following alternate members who may attend and vote in the absence of an appointed committee member: Judge Mary “Betsy” Cotton, Judge Mike Dickinson, and Judge Walt Brown.

Cochran v. State, 2014-M-00090 (denying “Request for Post-Conviction Forensic, DNA, and Handwriting Testing,” finding that the filing was frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings may be sanctioned)

Trest v. State, 2021-CT-00968-SCT (denying cert)

Jackson Pub. Sch. Dist. v. Jackson Federation of Teachers and PSRPS, 2022-CA-00464-SCT (denying cert)

Brent v. MDHS, 2022-CT-00529-SCT (granting cert)

In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2024-AD-00001-SCT (directing the disbursement of $215,281.86 in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services.

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 14, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down ten opinions on this Valentine’s Day. These opinions cover a lot of territory including criminal, custody, personal injury, and PCR.

Clayton v. State, 2021-KA-00505-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err by refusing the defendant’s lesser-included instructions and that the evidence was sufficient to support the deliberate design element for both counts.
(10-0)

Kirk v. State, 2021-KA-00733-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

MIMG C Woodridge Sub LLC v. Course, 2021-CA-00535-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming award for past and future pain and suffering against an apartment complex to a plaintiff whose apartment was burglarized by someone who used an office key, holding that the award of $450,000 in noneconomic damages ($250,000 for past; $200,000 for future) was not excessive based on the evidence.
(8-2: Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes)

NOTE – The jury also awarded $42,080 in economic damages for the stolen items medical bills for psychiatric care.

Hull v. State, 2022-CP-00088-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial the plaintiff’s PCR petition, holding that the plaintiff was properly sentenced, he was not denied effective assistance, and his motion to receive a copy of his record and transcript was moot.
(10-0)

Stevenson v. State, 2021-KA-00411-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that allowing the State’s forensic pathologist testify remotely violated the Confrontation Clause because there was no case-specific determination of necessity but that it was harmless error since there was other sufficient evidence to support the verdict.
(5-5-0: Wilson, Lawrence, Smith, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without separate written opinion)

McFarland v. State, 2021-CA-01311-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming in part and reversing/rendering in part the trial court’s rulings on a petition to correct eligibility for parole, holding that the trial court erred in treating the petition as a motion to modify the sentence and that the trial court had jurisdiction to consider the petition but also holding that the record supported a finding that the plaintiff was not eligible for parole.
(8-1-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Jordan v. State, 2021-KA-01421-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery of the defendant’s minor stepdaughter, holding that the trial court did not err in allowing a sexual assault nurse examiner was not reversible error, that the trial court did not err in admitting “nanny cam” video into evidence, that trial counsel’s lack of hearsay objection to a letter did not affect the outcome, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge Smith did not participate)

Rye v. State, 2021-CA-00477-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing denial of motion for PCR, holding that the trial court erred in denying the motion on the basis that the guilty plea prevented the plaintiff from asserting that newly discovered evidence existed that could prove his innocence.
(10-0)

Denham v. Lafayette County Department of CPS, 2021-CA-00871-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming judgment terminating a mother’s parental rights, holding that the chancellor’s ruling was based on substantial credible evidence and that there was no merit to her arguments regarding her attorney’s performance or the GAL’s report and testimony.
(5-2-2: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Carlton concurred in result only without separate written opinion; McCarty concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks; Greenlee did not participate)

Haynes v. Beckward, 2019-CA-01508-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the trial court judgment’s after a car wreck trial, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the defendant-driver’s testimony that he saw three other cars pass his trailer before the accident without incident or in denying a mistrial after the plaintiff testified about the defendant’s insurance company during cross, but holding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion for remittitur where the awards for future medical expenses and future lost wages exceeded the competent evidence on those elements.
(6-1-3: Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without separate written opinion; Lawrence concurred in part and dissented in part with separate written opinion, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty, and in part by McDonald.)

DISCLOSURE – I was not trial counsel, but I represent the appellants in this appeal.

Other Orders

Smith v. State, 2020-KA-00775-COA (granting motion for authorization to proceed out of time)

Blagodirova v. Schrock, 2020-CA-01162-COA (denying rehearing)

Bowman v. State, 2020-KA-01371-COA (denying rehearing)

Dampier v. State, 2021-KA-00280-COA (denying rehearing)

O’Quinn v. State, 2021-KA-00534-COA (denying motion for permission to proceed out of time)

Keys v. Rehabilitation, Inc., 2021-CA-01338-COA (denying rehearing)

Young v. State, 2022-CP-00141-COA (denying rehearing)

Johnson v. State, 2022-CP-01186-COA (sua sponta allowing appeal to proceed as timely)

Boyett v. State, 2022-TA-01239-COA (sua sponte suspending appeal deadline to allow untimely appeal to proceed on the merits)

Silas v. State, 2022-TS-01265-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction)

Hand Down List