Tag: criminal procedure

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 27, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eleven opinions today. The majority are PCR cases, but there are a few direct criminal appeals, a personal injury case, and a divorce case.

Magee v. State, 2023-CP-00008-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err by failing to appoint counsel to represent the petitioner at his evidentiary hearing, finding that the guilty pleas were knowing/intelligent/voluntary, or in denying the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.
(9-0)

Haley v. State, 2023-CP-00918-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of second PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the motion was successive and time-barred.
(9-0)

Stacy v. Stacy, 2023-CA-00219-COA (Civil – Domestic)
Reversing the chancellor’s division of martial property and alimony award, holding that the chancellor erred by failing to address both the Ferguson factors and the Armstrong factors in the decision.
(9-0)

Harris v. State, 2023-KA-00460-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming resentencing for conviction of depraved heart murder, holding that the trial court did not err in sentencing the defendant to life imprisonment and that the defendant had no liberty interest in parole.
(7-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only; Emfinger did not participate)

Alexander v. Metropolitan Y.M.C.A., 2022-CP-01092-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in a personal injury action arising from a swimming pool accident, holding that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment where there was no evidence of breach or proximate cause.
(7-0: McDonald and Emfinger did not participate)

Easterling v. State, 2023-KA-00610-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance as a second or subsequent offender and habitual offender, holding that there were no grounds for reversal after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(9-0)

LaFleur v. State, 2022-KA-00500-COA, consolidated with 2022-IA-01244-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss, holding that the trial court’s ruling granting a new trial on attempted murder did not constitute an acquittal so the Double Jeopardy Clause did not prohibit a second trial, and dismissing direct appeal because the defendant did not challenge his conviction of simple assault.

Pryer v. State, 2023-CP-00568-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of a Rule 60(b)(6) motion to reconsider the denial of a PCR motion challenging the revocation of a suspended sentence, holding that it was error to deny the motion reconsider because MDOC’s petition for revocation cited only technical violations.
(9-0)

Hardy v. State, 2023-CP-00970-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the guilty plea was voluntary, that any Fourth Amendment or Sixth Amendment challenges were waived by the guilty plea.
(9-0)

Wallace v. State, 2023-KA-00071-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of armed robbery, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error by proceeding with voir dire in the defendant’s absence where the defendant knew about the trial date but had transportation issues, that there was no reversible error related to the prosecutor’s statements during closing, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-1[0]-1[2]: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald.)

Siggers v. State, 2023-CP-00324-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the trial court’s summary denial of a pro se “Habeas Corpus” pleading that it treated as a PCR motion, holding that the trial court erred by treating the pleading as a PCR motion but affirming denial of the “Habeas Corpus” because the issue was moot once the final revocation hearing was held, but remanding the matter to consider a subsequent PCR motion.
(6-3: McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes and Westbrooks, joined in part by McCarty)

Other Orders

  • None

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 7, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down ten opinions today. They started out with a run of short and sweet 10-0 opinions and then things got more interesting. There are two split opinions on the admission of confessions, a construction contract/negligence case, a divorce decision, several more direct criminal appeals, and a couple of PCR opinions.

Johnson v. State, 2022-KA-01127-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that after a review of counsel’s Lindsey Brief and the record that there was no reversible error.
(10-0)

Carter v. State, 2023-KA-00052-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s accident instruction and that the castle-doctrine’s presumption of fear was procedurally barred and that the evidence was sufficient to show that the defendant did not act in self defense.
(10-0)

Reed v. State, 2023-KA-00248-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of hydrocodone/acetaminophen, holding that after a review of counsel’s Lindsey Brief and the record that there was no reversible error.
(10-0)

Dobbins v. State, 2023-CA-00562-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary dismissal of PCR petition, holding that the petition was statutorily barred.
(10-0)

Mac Long Homes, LLC v. Olvera Construction, LLC, 2022-CA-00938-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the circuit court’s dismissal of of a contractor’s claims against a subcontractor after the contractor lost an arbitration proceeding against the homeowner, holding that the breach of contract and negligent misrepresentation claims were time-barred, that the common-law indemnity claim was not yet ripe so dismissal without prejudice was proper, that the negligence claim was not time-barred, and that the circuit court did not err in denying the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald and McCarty; Wilson concurred in the result only without separate written opinion)

NOTE – The common-law indemnity holding here is interesting. I have been in and around the argument that crossclaims of common-law indemnity against codefendants are not proper for lack of ripeness. I expect that this opinion will be cited frequently in the future.

Hollon v. State, 2023-CP-00202-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR petition, holding that the guilty plea was voluntary and not coerced, that trial counsel was not ineffective, and that the petitioner was not otherwise entitled to relief.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Winstead, v. State, 2022-KA-01235-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death, holding that the trial court erred in admitting the defendant’s confession because it was obtained in violation of Edwards v. Arizona but that the error was harmless in light of the overwhelming weight of evidence of guilt, and holding that the trial court did not err by admitting a bloodstain card.
(6-4: Carlton concurred in part and in the result without writing; Greenlee and Smith concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Lawrence concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Carlton, Greenlee, and Smith.)

NOTE – The partial dissent took issue with the majority’s holding that the confession should have been excluded. Here is the majority’s summary of its holding on that issue:

Smith v. State, 2023-KA-00185-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery of a minor, holding that the circuit court did not err in admitting the defendant’s confession or by holding the trial in absentia.
(4-2-4: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; McCarty dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McDonald, and joined in part by Barnes and Emfinger)

Weatherly v. Weatherly, 2022-CA-00804-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in awarding sole physical custody to the mother, in awarding child support to the mother to the father despite the mother’s significantly higher income, in the valuation and distribution of marital property, in awarding the father alimony, or in denying the father’s request for attorney’s fees.
(3-2-4: McDonald and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Barnes, Westbrooks, and Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Wilson concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes, Westbrooks, and Emfinger, and joined in part by McDonald and McCarty; Smith did not participate)

City of Verona v. Moffett, 2022-WC-01050-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s finding that a former police officer sustained an 80% loss of wage-earning capacity, holding that there was substantial, credible evidence supporting the Commission’s decision that was based on evidence of physical injuries and PTSD resulting from a physical assault while the claimant was responding to a domestic violence call.
(6-1-3: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson dissented, joined by Smith and Emfinger.)

Other Orders

  • Silver Dollar Sales, Inc. v. Battah, 2022-CA-00476-COA (rehearing denied)
  • Fluker v. State, 2022-KA-00692-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Quinn v. State, 2022-KA-00962-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 5, 2024

I’m back. Again. I would like to think I will go back and summarize the last few weeks that I have missed but that is probably water under the bridge at this point. Pressing forward, the Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. These decisions cover custody, felonies, personal injury, unemployment, and zoning. Notably, two criminal convictions were reversed.

Patrick v. Patrick, 2021-CA-00891-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s denial of the mother’s petition for contempt and modification and granting the father’s motion for modification, holding that the issue of custody was clearly before the chancellor who properly determined that there was a material change in circumstances that adversely affected the children, conducted a proper Albright analysis, and was within his discretion to order a change in legal and physical custody.
(8-1-1: McCarty concurred in part and in the result and McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part. Neither wrote.)

Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00419-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing convictions six counts of statutory rape, holding that the jury was not properly instructed as to the State’s burden of proof and remanding for a new trial.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing.)

Practice Point: The erroneous instruction was submitted by the defense, but the Court noted that the “invited-error doctrine” did not apply where the jury was not properly instructed on the elements of the crime. Here is the Court’s summary of the issues with the jury instructions:

Fletcher v. State, 2022-KA-00868-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder and sentence as habitual offender, holding that the trial court did not err when it failed to suppress the defendant’s statement to law enforcement officials.
(10-0)

The Avion Group, Inc. v. The City of Oxford, 2023-CA-00169-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision denying an ordinance variance to repair a wall/fence that enclosed the petitioner’s property, holding that the petitioner did not waive its challenge to the city’s code interpretation but that the circuit court’s interpretation of the code provisions at issue were not erroneous.
(10-0)

Carter v. C&S Canopy, Inc., 2022-CA-00730-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a driver and his employer in an auto-negligence case, holding that there was no evidence to support the plaintiff’s claim that the driver negligently continued to drive a “sluggish” truck on the interstate, that the defendants were negligent in their efforts to get the truck towed, that the location of reflective triangles was the proximate cause of the crash, that the defendant could have safely moved the disabled truck anywhere other than where he did, that the driver should have registered as a for-hire carrier, or that the employer negligently failed to train the driver.

Appellate Math Warning: None of us signed up for this.

Marshall v. State, 2022-KA-00541-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the circuit court erred in denying the defense’s peremptory strikes of three jurors, holding that the defense provided valid, race-neutral reasons for the strikes.
(10-0)

Cain v. M.D.E.S., 2023-CC-00188-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming denial of claim for unemployment benefits, holding that the circuit court properly dismissed the claimant’s appeal of denial as untimely.
(10-0)

Other Orders

Walker v. State, 2022-KA-00482-COA (denying rehearing)

Gregory Meridian Acquisition, LLC v. McFarland, 2022-CA-00580-COA (denying rehearing)

Fox v. Fox, 2022-CA-00918-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 14, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. They cover custody, personal injury, felonies, and PCR. One of the personal injury cases stems from an injury sustained during a “TikTok challenge” in a classroom.

Croom v. State, 2022-KA-00598-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of a dwelling and conspiracy to commit burglary of a dwelling, holding that the trial court did not err by refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of trespass and that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction of conspiracy.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Snyder v. Estate of Cockrell, 2022-CA-00597-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming summary judgment in a negligence case a man filed against his grandfather’s estate after a child caused the grandfather’s golf cart to run into the plaintiff, holding that in the plaintiff could not prove a breach of duty where there was only speculation about the grandfather’s conduct after he finished operating the golf cart.
(8-2-0: McDonald concurred in part and in result without written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in result only with separate written opinion)

Johnson v. State, 2022-CP-01186-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the petitioner failed to present evidence other than his bare assertions that his plea was involuntary and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in not granting the petitioner an evidentiary hearing.
(10-0)

Scott v. Le, 2022-CA-00887-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s custody award, holding that the chancellor’s finding that there was a material change in circumstances and the chancellor’s application of the Albright factors to to deny the mother’s request for sole physical custody and grant the father’s request for sole physical custody was supported by substantial evidence.
(10-0)

Taylor v. State, 2022-KA-01042-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted murder and two counts of possession of a controlled substance, holding that evidence of prior arrests did not constitute evidence of prior bad acts under Rule 404(a) because it was offered as the foundation of a witness’s identification of the defendant and that would have been otherwise admissible under the exception in 404(b), that it passed the 403 balancing and, even if it was not admissible, it would have been harmless error.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Brown v. State, 2022-KA-00446-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and shooting into a vehicle, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions, that the defendant waived the issue of the judge’s refusal of a second-degree murder instruction when trial counsel did not object and agreed with the judge’s decision, and there was no merit to the claim that a clinical and forensic psychological expert was pressured into proceeding with an independent psychological examination without all of the records he had requested.
(10-0)

Bumpous v. Tishomingo County School District, 2022-CA-01010-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the school district in a negligent supervision after a student was injured in a class room after falling victim to a “TikTok challenge,” holding that that the injury was not reasonable foreseeable and there was no genuine issue of material fact that would warrant reversal of the summary judgment.
(6-2-2: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without written opinion; McCarty dissented, joined by Carlton, and joined in part by Westbrooks and McDonald)

Other Orders

Smith v. State, 2026-KA-01946-COA (denying pro se motion to recall mandate and allow untimely motion for rehearing)

Hall v. State, 2022-CP-01097-COA (recalling mandate and allowing appellant’s timely pro se motion for rehearing to proceed on the merits)

McGee v. State, 2023-KA-00083-COA (remanding to the circuit court for forty-five days for a hearing consistent with Mississippi Rule of Appellate Procedure 6(c)(2) and an order)

Patton v. State, 2023-TS-00618-COA (allowing timely appeal to proceed on the Court’s own motion)

Crump v. State, 2023-TS-00795-COA (allowing timely appeal to proceed on the Court’s own motion)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 26, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There is something for everyone: tort, real property, divorce, direct criminal appeals, and PCR. Due to volume of paying work and COA output I had to move quickly to get these out, so I expect a higher-than-normal rate of typos.

Odom v. State, 2021-KA-00676-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of murder, holding that computer printouts of GPS and location data from Google were not properly authenticated and should not have been admitted but that the error was harmless, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting photos of a vehicle over an authentication objection, that the trial court did not err in excluding paint-transfer evidence and crime lab documents for lack of authenticity, and holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence.
(7-3: Wilson dissented without written opinion; Westbrooks dissented, joined in part by McDonald)

Practice Point – On the authenticity of Google satellite images, the Court noted that the images themselves were not hearsay, but that computer-generated data included on the photos required authentication:

Robb v. McLaughlin, 2021-CA-00672-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming a judgment after jury trial in a negligence/infliction of emotional distress/invasion of privacy/defamation/libel case stemming from the defendant posting a false ad for prostitution online with the plaintiff’s phone number, holding that the defendant’s due process rights were not violated, the proceedings were properly bifurcated into compensatory and punitive phases, the plaintiff was not required to produced expert medical testimony on her intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, the damages were not speculative, and the jury instructions were appropriate.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without written opinion.)

Practice Point– I have cited the 5th Circuit’s Krieser decisions for the proposition that settlement as to one defendant does not affect apportionment at trial–a proposition that can cut either way. It is nice to have a Mississippi Court of Appeals decision to cite (citing Krieser) for this proposition.

Alexander v. State, 2022-CA-00397-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion that argued ineffective assistance of counsel, holding that the circuit court’s decision was not clearly erroneous, legally in error, or an abuse of discretion.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without written opinion)

Bradshaw v. State, 2022-KA-00469-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that the indictment was not overly broad to the point it failed to provide sufficient notice under a plain error analysis or on the merits, that there was no violation of the right to speedy trial, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony of prior bad acts because it complied with Rule 404(b).
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate.)

Smith v. State, 2022-KA-00664-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery of a child, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the defendant’s motion for continuance because the State’s discovery violations did not result in manifest injustice, that the trial court did not commit plain error by severing the codefendant’s case without a proper motion, and that the lack of error precluded reversal for cumulative error.
(10-0)

Titus v. Stelzer, 2022-CA-01079-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s order in a suit to set aside a quitclaim deed and to confirm and quiet title, holding that the chancellor did not err in setting aside the quitclaim deed and confirming title through a prior conveyance.
(9-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without written opinion.)

Gregg v. State, 2022-KA-00485-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of amphetamine and marijuana, holding that the sole issue on appeal–ineffective assistance of counsel–should be dismissed without prejudice because the record was insufficient to address the issue on direct appeal.
(10-0)

Patel v. State, 2022-CA-00985-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion to withdraw and vacate a prior admission of guilt in a pretrial intervention after the petitioner learned that even with dismissal and expungement he was not eligible for lawful permanent residence status under the INA, holding that the circuit court properly dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate.)

Gussio v. Gussio, 2020-CA-00785-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s judgment in a divorce case granting the mother a divorce and granting her physical and legal custody of the children, holding that the chancellor did not err in the amount of child support awarded, in not imputing income to the mother, in awarding alimony, by denying the father’s motion in limine to exclude evidence of the mother’s attorney’s fees, in awarding attorney’s fees, or in denying motion to alter or amend the judgment and consider new evidence.
(5-5: Wilson concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Greenlee, Lawrence, Smith, and Emfinger.)

NOTE – Judge Wilson’s partial dissent agreed with the rulings on child support and alimony, but asserted that the award of attorneys’ fees should not be affirmed because the record and the chancellor’s findings on attorneys’ fees were insufficient. I am putting this one on my cert watchlist.

Other Orders

Lynn v. State, 2021-KA-00968-COA (denying rehearing)

Culver v. Culver, 2021-CA-01108-COA (denying rehearing)

Stevenson v. State, 2021-KA-01286-COA (recalling mandate)

Lestrick v. State, 2021-CP-01409-COA (denying motion for additional time to file motion for rehearing)

Covin v. Covin, 2022-COA-00019-COA (denying motion for appellate attorney’s fees)

Amos v. State, 2022-KA-00171-COA (denying motion for enlargement of time to file motion for rehearing)

Pickle v. State, 2022-CP-00929-COA (recalling mandate)

Rehabilitation Centers, Inc. v. Williams, 2023-WC-00453-COA (granting motion to dismiss consolidated appeals as interlocutory)

Miller v. State, 2023-TS-00812-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as timely)

Gardner v. State, 2023-TS-00903-COA (granting motion to consolidate)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 22, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions today. There are two direct criminal appeals, two custody cases, and a real property case deciding the parties’ respective rights to a common wall that gave me bar exam flashbacks.

In the Matter of the Guardianship of B.P., 2021-CA-01288-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s order in a custody matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the child’s appointed guardians successfully rebutted the natural parent presumption and that it was in the child’s best interest to remain in the guardians’ custody.
(8-1-1: No separate opinions. Westbrooks concurred in the result only and McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without separate written opinion.)

Ndicu v. Gacheri, 2022-CA-00415-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s judgment in a custody matter, holding that the chancellor did not manifestly abuse his discretion by denying the father’s request for past child support and education expenses.
(10-0)

Kelly v. State, 2022-KA-00577-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for new trial based on an allegation that a juror misrepresented her lack of familial relationship with the victim where the claimed familial relationship was not supported by credible evidentiary support and, even if there was a familial relationship, there was no evidence the juror knew about it when she said she was not related to the defendant.
(8-1-1: No separate opinions. Westbrooks concurred in result only; McDonald dissented.)

NOTE – The alleged familial relationship surfaced when a member of the defendant’s family sent the juror in question a Facebook message:

LIFE TIP – Do not message jurors.

Alford v. Cotton Row Hospitality, LLC, 2022-CA-00125-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming in part and reversing in part on direct appeal and cross-appeal in a case about a common wall between two properties in a downtown area, holding that Side A of the wall had established a prescriptive easement for the use of the wall but did not obtain an ownership interest by adverse possession of the wall that was located on Side B’s property and included in Side B’s deed, that there was no equitable need for Side B to sell the wall to Side A, and that Side A did not have to reimburse Side B for its expense in supporting the wall Side B incurred after tearing down the other three walls of Side B’s property.
(10-0)

NOTE – This opinion also discusses the doctrine of unclean hands (it did not apply) and the adequacy of pleading the prescriptive easement claim (it was adequate).

Smith v. State, 2020-KA-00774-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of assault and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the trial court committed harmless error (i.e. not plain error) by giving a pre-arming jury instruction that was not objected to, that the evidence was sufficient to establish the defendant’s identity, that the trial court did not err in giving a flight instruction where the defendant did not provide an independent and uncontradicted reason for his flight, and that the defendant’s trial counsel was not ineffective.
(8-2: Emfinger dissented, joined by Wilson.)

NOTE – The dissent’s position is that the defendant’s appeal of his conviction and sentence was not properly before the court:

Other Orders

Friley v. State, 2021-KA-00791-COA (granting pro se motion for time for rehearing motion)

Renfroe v. Parker, 2021-CA-01048-COA (denying rehearing)

McFarland v. State, 2021-CA-01311-COA (denying rehearing)

Everett v. State, 2021-CP-2021 (denying rehearing)

Fagan v. Faulkner, 2022-CA-00130-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of July 27, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions in direct criminal appeals today. One involved the adequacy of the indictment and sentencing as a habitual offender. The other raised issues of weight and sufficiency of evidence, the trial court’s failure to rule on an objection during trial, closing argument, and the racial composition of the jury. One ended in a reversal and the other an affirmance.

Young v. State, 2021-KA-00940-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing sentence as a habitual offender, holding that the indictment failed to comply with Rule 14.1(b)(1) but defendant waived the issue of defective indictment by failing to object to it in the trial court but also holding that the evidence was insufficient to support the habitual offender sentence and remanding for resentencing.
(9-0)

Redd v. State, 2022-KA-00175-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault causing bodily injury, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the overwhelming weight of it, that the defendant waived his objection to testimony by failing to request corrective action from the trial court, that the State was entitled to draw inferences from facts in the record during closing, and that the issue of the racial composition of the jury was procedurally barred and without merit because the defendant did not object to the racial composition and the record was silent about the composition.
(9-0)

Other Orders

In Re: Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure, 89-R-99027-SCT (amending Miss. R. App. P.)

Parker v. Ross, 2020-CT-01055-SCT (denying motion for costs)

Yarborough v. Singing River Health Systems, 2021-CT-00668-SCT (denying cert)

The Banking Group, Inc. v. Southern Bancorp Bank, 2021-CT-01077-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of July 6, 2023 (catch-up post)

On Thursday, July 6, the Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions. Two are direct criminal appeals and one is an civil appeal addressing the statutes of limitations for MTCA claims and state constitutional claims.

Stewart v. State, 2022-KA-00479-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth, holding that the defendant waived his Fourth Amendment and Miranda rights arguments by not raising them at trial court, and then waived plain error arguments on appeal by not raising them until the reply brief after the State asserted waiver, and further that the “sparse record” did not show plain error.
(9-0)

Moton v. Clarksdale, 2022-CA-00216-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Denying rehearing but withdrawing the original opinions and substituting another holding that the trial court correctly found that a city commissioner’s tort law claims stemming from his arrest were barred by the MTCA’s statute of limitations and that the claims arising under the Mississippi Constitution were barred by the general statute of limitations.
(9-0)

Mitchell v. State, 2021-KA-00589-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that there was insufficient evidence in the record to find that a due process violation occurred when the trial court denied the defendant’s request for the production of an autopsy report and then denied a request to conduct an autopsy.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Barber v. State, 2022-KA-00291-SCT (per curiam affimance)

Lofton v. Lofton, 2021-CT-00035-SCT (denying cert)

Clark v. Vicksburg Healthcare, LLC, 2021-CT-00173-SCT (denying motion to strike cert petition, granting motion to suspend the rules, accepting the filing of a cert petition, and denying cert)

Griffin v. State, 2023-M-00262 (denying mandamus)

Carr v. State, 2023-DR-00503-SCT (remanding PCR issues to circuit court)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 25, 2023

The Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today and there is something for just about every practice area. There are two appellate jurisdiction cases, a will contest, a breach of contract case, two direct criminal appeals, a divorce/marital estate division case, a breach of termite contract case, an intra-church lawsuit, and an intentional tort/attorney’s fees case.

Herning v. Lakeview S/C Partners, Ltd., 2021-CA-01427-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of the defendant’s appeal from summary judgment for the plaintiff entered by the county court, holding that the defendant failed to pay the cost bond for his appeal within the thirty-day time limit so the circuit court lacked jurisdiction.
(8-2: McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without separate written opinion; Lawrence dissented without separate written opinion.)

Pearson v. Eubanks, 2022-CA-00011-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the chancery court’s dismissal of a will contest, holding that the plaintiffs’ well-pleaded allegations when the filed the will contest provided them stating to contest the will on undue influence grounds.
(10-0)

Lewis v. State, 2021-KA-00472-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first and second degree murder, holding:
1. No error in transferring venue that the defendant requested.
2. No error in denying Castle Doctrine and stand-your-ground jury instructions.
3. The doctrine of retroactive misjoinder did not apply.
4. Limiting the defense’s cross-examination of a witness about his pending indictment was harmless error.
5. The objection to the investigator’s testimony about exit wounds was waived.
6. No speedy trial violation (issue raised pro se)
7. No error in denying the motion to quash and dismiss the indictment (issue raised pro se)
8. The State did not commit prosecutorial misconduct (issue raised pro se)
9. No error in allowing the jury to review transcript of the defendant’s recorded statement (issue raised pro se)
10. Evidence was sufficient and the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of it (issue raised pro se)
(7-3-0: Barnes and Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Smith concurred in part and in the result, joined by Barnes and Lawrence.)

Kloss v. Bay Pest Control, Inc., 2021-CA-01117-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming summary judgment dismissing breach of termite-prevention contract and negligence claim, holding that the presence of termites alone did not support the breach of contract claim or the negligence claim.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Underwood v. State, 2021-CP-01123-COA (Civil – Other)
Dismissing direct appeal of a guilty plea for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice.
(10-0)

Christian v. State, 2021-KA-00898-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault upon receipt of a Lindsey brief and the Court’s review of the record, holding that there were no arguable issues for appeal.
(10-0)

Lewis v. Lewis, 2022-CA-00016-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s line of demarcation for division of the marital estate and award of alimony, holding that the chancellor was well within her discretion to use a December 2020 temporary order as the line of demarcation rather that the trial date and that the chancellor’s alimony findings were sufficient and her ruling was not ab abuse of discretion.
(10-0)

Miller v. Board of Trustees of Second Baptist Church of Starkville, 2020-CA-01384-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing a monetary judgment following a jury trial, holding that the board of trustees of a church lacked standing to sue the church’s senior pastor and chairman of its deacons for breach of fiduciary duties and other claims, holding that the board lacked authority to file the lawsuit without the church members’ approval and lacked authority to maintain suit after a majority of members voted against it.
(5-2-3: Westbrooks and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Greenlee dissented without separate written opinion; Barnes dissented, joined by Greenlee and McDonald)

Herbert v. Herbert, 2021-CA-01291-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming on direct appeal and reversing on cross-appeal, holding that the circuit court erred in granting summary judgment on the grounds the affirmative defense of release because that defense had been waived but affirming on de novo review of the merits of claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress, verbal assault, conversion, fraudulent misrepresentation, defamation, and breach of contract, but reversing the circuit court’s denial of attorney’s fees to the defendant and remanded for further proceedings.
(6-1-2: McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Carlton concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald; Emfinger did not participate.)

Other Orders

Lofton v. Lofton, 2021-CA-00035-COA (denying rehearing)

Yarborough v. Singing River Health Systems, 2021-CA-00668-COA (denying rehearing)

Buchanan v. State, 2021-CP-01069-COA (recalling mandate so motion for rehearing can proceed on merits)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 14, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. There was nary a dissent, but a conviction of child exploitation was reversed. The are other felony opinions, two divorce cases, a contract case involving a defunct LLC, and a PCR case.

Nunn v. State, 2021-KA-01371-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of having meth within 1,500 feet of a church, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for mental competency evaluation where the trial court twice held a hearing to determine whether the defendant understood and appreciated the significance of the trial proceedings and had the ability to rationally aid in his defense or in denying the defendant’s entrapment instruction.
(10-0)

Singh v. State, 2022-CP-00273-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding no error in revoking post-release supervision since the plaintiff absconded from supervision.
(10-0)

Williams v. Williams, 2021-CA-00758-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment of divorce, holding that the chancellor’s valuation of the marital residence was based on evidentiary support in the record.
(10-0)

Wakefield v. State, 2021-KA-00187-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of accessory after the fact to murder, to kidnapping, and to auto theft, holding:
1. The circuit court had jurisdiction because it sat in one of the counties where the crimes were committed;
2. That the convictions did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause even though the defendant gave just one car ride because he was an accessory to three distinct felonies so the merger doctrine did not apply;
3. That there was no error based on the weight or sufficiency of the evidence;
4. That the indictment was not defective for failing to include “intent” where it did include “willfully;” and
5. That there was no error in admitting autopsy and crime scene photos.
(8-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Emfinger did not participate)

NOTE – These convictions stemmed from the kidnapping and murder of six-year-old Kingston Frazier in 2017.

Holmes v. Lankford, 2022-CA-00203-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming summary judgment for the defendant in a dispute over a sand and gravel operation agreement, holding that the plaintiff did not have standing to enforce the agreement that was between the defendant and the plaintiff’s administratively dissolved LLC and that the plaintiff did not otherwise show he was entitled to relief.
(10-0)

NOTE – Conducting business through an LLC can cut both ways:

Mason v. State, 2021-KA-00964-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of child exploitation, holding that the trial court erred in denying funds for an independent computer forensics expert because the State’s witness/detective should have been considered an expert and that this error hindered the defendant’s jurisdictional challenge and led to evidentiary errors that contributed to an unfair trial.
(7-3-0: Wilson, Smith, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result)

Moss v. Moss, 2021-CA-00452-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Modified opinion on motion for rehearing affirming the chancellor’s decision granting the wife divorce on the ground of habitual cruel and inhuman treatment, holding that there was substantial evidence to support that finding (read the facts for yourself if you have doubts), that the subject matter of wife’s expert’s opinions was adequately disclosed and was not even a basis for the chancellor’s decision, and the husband’s claim for separate maintenance was moot since the divorce was affirmed.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Hornsby v. Hornsby, 2020-CA-01091-COA (dismissing motion for attorney’s fees)

Blount v. State, 2021-KA-00204-COA (denying rehearing)

Mayberry v. Cottonport Hardwoods, 2021-CA-00246-COA (denying rehearing)

Anderson v. State, 2021-KA-01340-COA (granting pro se motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing and recalling mandate)

Easterling v. State, 2022-CA-00796-COA (vacating circuit court’s order and rendering judgment dismissing motion for PCR)

Hunter v. State, 2022-TS-01269-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)

Hand Down List