Tag: Default

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 10, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. Six are direct criminal appeals and one is a real property/default judgment case. One of the cases involves a crossbow and included a visual aid.

Nailer v. State, 2023-KA-00627-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault after he fired a crossbow into an occupied vehicle, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a requested instruction of simple assault as a lesser-included offense, that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, and that instructions given did not impermissibly comment on the weight of the evidence were not argumentative and did not deprive the defendant of a fair and objective consideration by the jury, and that the defendant was not deprived of his right to testify.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

NOTE – An appendix to the opinion has a photo of the scene:

Young v. Martin, 2023-CA-00980-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision denying a motion to set aside a default judgment in an action to quiet title and confirm a tax title, holding that the complaint signed by an attorney was a “sworn complaint” for purposes of Miss. Code Ann. § 11-17-1, that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion denying a Rule 60 motion or in deciding that the proper parties were notified of the tax sale.
(7-2: Westbrooks and McDonald dissented without writing; Smith did not participate)

Practice Point – Here is the crux of the Court’s holding on the first issue that is worth keeping in mind:

Wagner v. State, 2023-KA-01123-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of felony aggravated domestic violence, holding after a review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record that there were no arguable issues for appeal.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00811-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress the firearm because the stop during which it was obtained did not violate the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without writing)

King v. State, 2023-KA-00658-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder based on counsel’s Lindsey brief and an independent review of the record.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Gardner v. State, 2023-KA-00903-COA consolidated with No. 2018-KA-01337-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing convictions of cocaine possession and felony evasion, holding that the trial court erred in admitting prior convictions for purposes of impeachment but also holding that the defendant is not entitled to a judgment of acquittal because there was sufficient evidence to support his convictions.
(7-2: Carlton dissented, joined by Smith; Emfinger did not participate)

Levi v. State, 2023-KA-00718-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth with intent distribute and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, holding that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of prior convictions for simple possession but that the error was harmless.
(5-4-1: Carlton concurred in part and in result, joined by Smith and Emfinger; Westbrooks and Smith concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Other Orders

  • Collins v. State, 2022-KA-01184-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Wallace v. Smith, 2023-KA-00071-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Siggers v. State, 2023-CP-00324-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Carroll v. State, 2023-CP-00688-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Miller v. State, 2023-CP-00812-COA (granting appellant’s pro se motion for leave to file motion for rehearing out of time)
  • Saddler v. State, 2024-CP-00099-COA (granting motion to reinstate his administratively dismissed appeal)
  • Taylor v. State, 2024-KA-00280-COA (granting motion to reinstate appeal)
  • Morris v. State, 2024-TS-00580-COA (sua sponte order allowing appeal to proceed on the merits)
  • Johnson v. State, 2024-TS-00650-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as timely)
  • Butler v. State, 2024-TS-00747-COA (granting motion to reinstate appeal)

Hand Down Page

Summaries of the Mississippi Court of Appeals opinions of March 8, 2022

There are six opinions from the Mississippi Court of Appeals today on a wide range of topics, including a holding that a defendant’s failure to respond to a complaint filed on March 6, 2020, until thirty-one days after service of process constituted “excusable neglect” in light of the COVID shutdowns at the time.

Hamer v. State, 2019-KA-01633-COA (Criminal – Felony/Evidence/Rule 403/Golden Rule)
Affirming conviction on two counts of capital murder and armed robbery and sentence to life in prison without parole, holding primarily that (1) wiretapped phone calls between the convicted and his father, whose drug trafficking enterprise the convicted had worked for, were admissible to show motive and tell “the complete story” to the jury, (2) the evidence was sufficient to establish nexus between the killing and the underlying felony to constitute capital murder, (3) and there was no impermissible Golden Rule argument at closing.
(Judge Westbrooks wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Judge McDonald.)

Crockett v. State, 2021-CP-00022-COA (Civil – PCR/Time Bar)
Affirming circuit court’s denial of a pro se motion for post-conviction collateral relief, holding that the claim of an involuntary guilty plea was both time-barred and meritless.
(All judges concurred, Chief Judge Barnes and Judge Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Erves v. Hosemann, 2020-CA-00467-COA (Civil – Property/Daubert)
Affirming chancellor’s decision denying relief in an action for an injunction to stop the use of a driveway and for monetary damages, holding that the petitioners failed to establish legal title to the subject property and specifically holding that the defendants’ expert witnesses were qualified and that the chancellor’s ruling was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.

Practice Point: Appellants got dinged on their Daubert challenge for arguing reliability on appeal when the only issue raised at the trial court was the experts’ qualifications:


(All judges concurred, Judge McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Archer v. Harlow’s Casino Resort & Spa, 2020-CP-00930-COA (Civil – Other/Default/Excusable Neglect)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the circuit court’s grant of the defendant’s motion to dismiss, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the defendant showed excusable neglect when it sought an extension of time to answer the complaint thirty-one days after being served and holding that the circuit clerk did not err by correcting a mistake and removing an entry of default, but holding that the trial court should have dismissed the complaint without prejudice and allowed the plaintiff an opportunity to amend her complaint under Rule 15(a).

ADDENDUM – COVID AND THE LAW: The defendant casino blamed the COVID-19 pandemic for being late to respond to the complaint. The casino was served with process on March 9, 2020, three days before the governor of Kentucky (where the casino’s counsel is located) issued a state of emergency and one week before Governor Reeves entered an order in Mississippi closing the casino. The casino asserted that these restrictions made it difficult to gather information from the closed casino in order to prepare and answer. The circuit court granted the late-filed extension request “in light of the current pandemic and government orders restricting operations and travel.” The court of appeals held that this was not an abuse of the circuit court’s broad discretion in this realm. In this case: COVID shutdown in March 2020 = “excusable neglect.”
(All judges concurred, Judge Wilson concurred in part and in the result without written opinion.)

Everett v. Dykes, 2020-CP-01331-COA (Civil – Property Damage/Recusal/Rule 48B)
Dismissing a pro se appeal of an order denying a motion for recusal of the circuit judge, holding that the appellant failed to comply with the procedure required by Rule 48B of the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure for an interlocutory appeal of the denial of a recusal motion.
(Judge Lawrence dissented without separate written opinion.)

Rives v. Ishee, 2020-CA-01328-COA (Civil – Contract/Statute of Limitations)
Affirming the chancellor’s dismissal of a breach of contract lawsuit, holding that the plaintiffs’ second lawsuit was time-barred because they did not file suit until more than three years after they learned they would receive no money from the restaurant and the statute of limitations was not tolled during the first lawsuit because it was dismissed for want of prosecution. The court of appeals also held that the remedy of quantum meruit was inapplicable because there was a contract between the parties.
(Judge Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Judge Greenlee.)

Other Orders

Westmoreland v. State, 2020-KA-00509-COA (denying motion for rehearing)
Winters v. State, 2020-KA-00809-COA (denying motion for rehearing)

Complete Hand Down List