Tag: Divorce

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 7, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions of substance yesterday. There is a divorce case, a timber case, a felony, a visitation/in loco parentis case, an heirship case, and a UM/UIM case with an interesting procedural question.

Hodge v. Hodge, 2024-CA-00745-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision granting the ex-wife’s petition to set aside a final divorce degree arguing that she was forced to sign it under duress, holding that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in finding the Rule 60(b)(4) motion timely, that section 93-5-2(5) did not apply because the complaint was not contested, that the chancellor erred by determining that the final divorce decree should be set aside in part because of the ex-husband’s claim splitting, and that there was not clear and convincing evidence that the ex-husband committed fraud.
(9-0: Lawrence for the Court; Barnes did not participate)

Payne Logging, LLC v. Smith, 2024-CA-00439-COA (Civil – Property Damage)
Affirming the chancellor’s award of monetary damages in a landowner’s claim against a logging company that removed timber off their property without permission while logging a neighbor’s property, holding that the chancery court did not err in applying the statutory guidelines in section 95-5-10.
(10-0: Westbrooks for the Court)

Hall v. State, 2024-KA-00364-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted capital murder, holding the the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and that it was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Edwards v. Johnson, 2023-CA-01271-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision denying a petition to establish visitation by a non-parent, holding that the chancellor erred in applying the doctrine of unclean hands before determining the petitioner’s in loco parentis status and, if necessary, reaching the issue of whether visitation was in the child’s best interest.
(6-3: Carlton for the Court; Weddle concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Wilson dissented; Emfinger dissented, joined in part by Wilson and Weddle; Lawrence did not participate)

In the Matter of Estate of Lewis: Curry v. Thomas, 2024-CA-00346-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision establishing paternity, holding that the one-year limitation for paternity is self-executing and thus cannot be waived and that the petitioner was barred from asserting an heirship claim because she did not attempt to establish paternity until almost eighteen years after her putative father’s death.
(7-3*: Barnes for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald, McCarty, and Lassitter St Pe’)

Thompson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, 2024-CA-00393-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict in favor of a UM carrier, holding that the trial court did not err in granting a directed verdict for the UM carrier because there was no proof that the tortfeasor was an uninsured motorist and UM/UIM status was a question for the jury, that the UM carrier did not waive the argument that UM coverage was not applicable because the carrier did not have a duty to prove that the tortfeastor was an uninsured motorist, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a new trial.
(7-3: Barnes for the Court; McDonald dissented without writing; McCarty dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McDonald)

Practice Point – McCarty’s dissent took issue with the directed verdict being granted during the damages phase of trial in front of the jury:

Other Orders

  • Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00884-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Quinn v. State, 2023-KA-01143-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 23, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. There is a reversal of a defense verdict in a med mal case and a reversal of a conviction. There are a couple of domestic relations cases and another criminal appeal.

Upchurch v. Lewis, 2023-CA-01296-COA, consolidated with Lewis v. Upchurch, 2024-CA-00396-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Reversing the circuit court’s denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for JNOV in a med mal case after a defense verdict, holding that the plaintiffs presented substantial testimony that the defendant-physician breached the standard of care and that his negligence caused the plaintiff’s injuries, and that since the defendant-physician was not tendered or accepted as an expert there was no insufficient evidence to support the verdict in favor of the defendant; affirming the trial court’s decision requiring the appellee to pay the $30,000 for the appellee’s additional record designations.
(6-3: Weddle for the Court; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes; Emfinger did not participate)

Sharp v. Sharp, 2024-CA-00171-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s order clarifying its final judgment of divorce, holding that the chancellor had authority to clarify and correct the final judgment and did not abuse his discretion in doing so regarding 529 accounts or requiring the father to pay college education expenses.
(9-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Clark v. State, 2024-KA-00932-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of one court of sexual battery, holding that the State’s improper reference to nonexistent DNA and repeated comments on evidence excluded by pretrial order amounted to denial of the defendant’s due process.
(8-2-0: McCarty for the Court; McDonald and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Thornhill v. Thornhill, 2023-CA-00714-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s grant of divorce on the ground of desertion, holding that there there was substantial credible evidence supporting the basis for divorce, that the chancellor did not err in property evaluation or equitable division, or in granting rehabilitative alimony instead of periodic alimony.
(10-0: Lawrence for the Court)

Practice Point – This is excerpt is worth noting. Failure to raise an issue in a Rule 59 motion does not bar that issue on appeal as long as it was presented to and decided by the trial court:

Alexander v. Scarbrough, 2023-CA-01359-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s award of full custody to a child’s mother, holding that there was substantial evidence to supporting the chancellor’s legal determinations and fact findings.
(10-0: Lawrence for the Court)

Harrison v. State, 2024-KA-00430-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of sexual battery, holding that the defendant’s argument that the date range in his indictment was not overly broad was procedurally barred and without merit.
(9-1-0: Carlton for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

  • Magyar v. Shiers, 2023-CA-00682-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Brownless v. Brownless, 2023-CA-01044-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Ruffin v. State, 2024-CA-00867-COA (denying State’s motion to strike untimely motion for rehearing)
  • Walker v. State, 2025-TS-00584-COA (sua sponte allowing untimely appeal to proceed)
  • Robertson v. State, 2025-TS-00806-COA (sua sponte allowing untimely appeal to proceed)
  • Hoskins v. State, 2025-TS-00993-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as timely after taking pro se response to show cause notice well)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 12, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions today. The Court also unleashed fourteen other orders, most of which are rehearing denials.

Parra v. Rapid-American Corporation, 2023-CA-01196-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal of a sixteen-year-old asbestos case for lack of prosecution, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion where there was a nine-year period of delay.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Taylor v. State, 2023-KA-01201-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of trafficking methamphetamine, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress evidence derived from a search that the defendant contended was defective.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing)

Tauzin v. Tauzin, 2024-CA-00141-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s order in a divorce case, holding that the chancellor did not err in interpreting or applying the parties’ antenuptial agreement, but that the chancellor did err in classification of marital property and by making insufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the Ferguson factors.
(8-0: Wilson for the Court; Carlton and Lassitter St. Pe’ did not participate)

Montoya v. State, 2023-KA-01324-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of three counts of touching a child for lustful purposes, holding that the trial court did not err in giving an instruction that the defendant argued was an improper comment on the evidence and that the defendant’s trial counsel was not ineffective.
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Childs v. State, 2023-CA-00126-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Foote v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport, 2023-CA-00504-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Thomas v. State, 2023-KA-00512-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00811-COA (denying rehearing)
  • McHard, McHard, Anderson & Associates, PLLC v. Robertson, 29230CA-00913-COA (granting appellees’ motion for appellate attorney’s fees and expenses)
  • Lee v. Doolittle, 2023-CA-00969-COA (denying rehearing)
  • McNaughton v. State, 2023-KA-01099-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Ruffin v. State, 2024-CA-00867-COA (denying the State’s motion to strike untimely motion for rehearing)
  • Pittman v. State, 2024-TS-00983-COA (granting motion for out-of-time appeal)
  • Cohen v. Trustmark National Bank, 2024-CP-01317-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of appealable judgment)
  • Black v. State, 2025-KM-00042-COA (denying motion to set aside dismissal of appeal)
  • Moore v. State, 2025-TS-00550-COA (allowing appeal to proceed on its merits)
  • Gales v. State, 2025-TS-00633-COA (granting pro se motion to proceed out of time)
  • Robinson v. State, 2025-TS-00700-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of appealable judgment)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 22, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down ten opinions today. These opinions cover personal injury, felonies, unauthorized practice of law, appellate jurisdiction, contract, and more. You can read my summaries below.

Varnado v. State, 2024-KA-00338-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of seven counts of sexual battery, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony under the Tender Years Exception, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing the State to ask a victim leading questions on direct, and that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for new trial or JNOV challenging the sufficiency and weight of the evidence.
(10-0: St. Pe’ for the Court)

Singh v. Singh, 2024-CA-00646-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the circuit court’s reversal of the county court in a garnishment dispute, holding that the county court’s decision granting a stay of garnishment was not supported by the evidence.
(9-0: St. Pe’ for the Court; Westbrooks did not participate)

Owens v. Boyd Biloxi LLC, 2024-CA-00330-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant in a slip-and-fall case, holding that the plaintiff failed to come forward with evidence that the defendant had actual or constructive knowledge of water’s presence on the floor.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Brown v. State, 2024-CA-00307-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the petition seeking permission to file an appeal nearly 15 years after conviction was time-barred and not subject to exceptions.
(9-0: McCarty for the Court; Weddle did not participate)

Quilantan v. State, 2024-CP-00357-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that there was no merit to the claim based on the absence of a PSI report, ineffective assistance of counsel, or failure to provide a certified interpreter.
(9-0: McDonald for the Court; Emfinger did not participate)

Williams v. Williams, 2023-CA-00992-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Dismissing appeal of a decision granting a divorce for lack of final, appealable judgment in a divorce case.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Rash v. State, 2023-KA-01284-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm, holding that there was no merit to the pro se arguments that the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury, that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, that the State committed prosecutorial misconduct, or that the deputy lacked probable cause or reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop that started it all.
(8-1-0: Carlton for the Court; McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks dissented without writing)

Patterson v. State, 2024-KA-00268-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the defendant’s rights to confrontation and a fair trial were not violated by the hearsay testimony where a hearsay objection was sustained and no curative instruction was sought and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Lenoire v. State, 2024-KM-00035-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Reversing conviction of practicing law without a license, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the charging affidavit, but that the circuit court’s commentary during the pronouncement of the guilty verdict created a reasonable doubt about the presumption of impartiality and amounted to plain error and that the defendant was deprived of his right to a jury trial and right to counsel.
(6-3: Barnes for the Court; Lawrence concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Carlton and Emfinger; Weddle did not participate)

Jackson v. State, 2023-KA-01280-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of three counts of trafficking controlled substances, holding that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applied where, though probable cause to support the warrant was lacking, law enforcement reasonably relied on a facially valid warrant.
(7-1-2: Wilson for the Court; Carlton concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald)

Other Orders

  • Roncali v. State, 2023-KA-00173-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Roberts v. Roberts, 2023-CA-00934-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Terry v. State, 2023-KA-00979-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 17 and June 24, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down a total of sixteen opinions between last week and today. You can read summaries below.

June 17, 2025

Briggs v. Jackson, 2023-CA-01241-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s judgment awarding the mother physical care, custody, and control of two minor children and granting the father visitation rights, holding that the court did not err in its Albright analysis but remanding on the issues of providing coverage of medical expenses, calculation of child support, and visitation schedule.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Mangum v. State, 2023-KA-01198-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of multiple counts of touching a child for lustful purposes and sexual battery, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s alibi instruction and did not commit plain error in admitting a memory card with photos.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Vaughn v. State, 2024-KA-00012-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of multiple counts of drive-by-shooting and shooting int a motor vehicle after review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and independent review of the record.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Hines v. PERS, 2023-SA-01400-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision affirming the PERS Board of Trustees’ decision to deny on-duty disability retirement benefits, holding that the decision was supported by supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary and capricious.
(10-0: Westbrooks for the Court)

Rodriguez v. State, 2023-KA-01159-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of manslaughter and two counts of second-degree murder, holding that the convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that there was no merit to claims of prosecutorial misconduct, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion sentencing the defendant to serve forty years on each count to run concurrently.
(9-1-0: Barnes for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result on without writing)

Other Orders

  • Taylor v. State, 2023-KA-00245-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Wallace v. State, 2023-KA-00721-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

June 24, 2025

Martin v. Martin, 2024-CA-00228-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision denying a petition for custody modification, holding that where there is no finding of an adverse impact there was no need to perform an Albright analysis and modification was not warranted.
(10-0: St. Pe’ for the Court.)

Martin v. Martin, 2024-CA-00222-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s contempt finding in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding the ex-wife in contempt of the divorce judgment and that she failed to prove her inability to comply and finding no abuse of discretion in the chancellor using contempt power of incarceration to enforce compliance.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Boyd v. Jones County, Mississippi, 2024-CA-00290-COA (Civil – Torts)
Dismissing appeal for want of final, appealable order.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Howard v. Howard, 2023-CA-01029-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s findings in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in determining equitable distribution or periodic alimony, or in failing to take into consideration supplemental security income benefits received by the minor child in determining child support.
(10-0: Westbrooks)

McHard, McHard, Anderson & Associates v. Robertson, 2023-CA-00913-COA (Civil – Eminent Domain)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in an eminent domain case, holding that the petitioner failed to prove that its proposed road was necessary.
(9-0: Carlton for the Court; Emfinger did not participate)

Dowdy v. Grayson, 2023-CA-00985-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming on direct appeal and reversing on cross-appeal, holding that the circuit court did not err in granting a directed verdict on a claim for malicious prosecution but holding that the circuit court erred in dismissing a counterclaim of fraud.
(5-2-3: Barnes for the Court; McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; Wilson dissented, joined by Lawrence and Emfinger, and joined in part by Westbrooks)

Brodie v. Brodie, 2023-CA-01397-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in reversing its initial ruling under Rule 59(e), in granting divorce on the grounds of habitual cruel and inhuman treatment, or in the division of marital property.
(9-1-0: Barnes for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Gombako-Amos v. Amos, 2023-CA-01253-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment of contempt in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the ex-wife was in contempt for failing to comply with a provision of the property settlement agreement.
(6-4: Wilson for the Court; Carlton and Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Carlton, Westbrooks, and McCarty)

Bhatti v. Board of Supervisors of Coahoma County, Mississippi, 2024-CA-00027-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of a claim to remove a bust of Ghandi from courthouse grounds, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that claim amounted to a mandamus action and that the petitioner lacked standing.
(8-1*-0: Weddle for the Court; Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald; Barnes did not participate)

Melton v. State, 2024-KM-00337-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Reversing conviction of misdemeanor child abuse, holding that the defendant did not expressly waive her constitutional right to a jury trial.
(6-4: Wilson for the Court; Emfinger dissented, joined by Carlton, Lawrence, and St. Pe’)

Heirs of Morsi v. JB Hunt Corporation, 2024-WC-00399-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s finding that a claim was not compensable, holding that the MWCC’s finding that the “found dead” presumption did not apply was supported by substantial credible evidence and was neither arbitrary nor capricious.
(6-1-3: Carlton for the Court; McCarty concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald and Lawrence)

Other Orders

  • Taylor v. State, 2023-CA-00738-COA (granting leave to file amicus brief)
  • Craft v. State, 2023-KA-00915-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Johnson v. Cleveland, 2023-CA-01011-COA
  • Foster v. Kovachev, 2023-CP-01030-COA (granting “motion regarding settlement,” dismissing certain parties to the appeal, granting in part appellees’ motion to dismiss appeal and request for sanctions and attorney’s fees, and dismissing appeal)
  • Blumer v. Majestic Homes, LLC, 2024-CA-00163-COA (granting motion for appellate attorney’s fees)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 13 and May 20, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions last week and a hearty eleven today. There are some interesting cases in the mix and a summary of each is below.

May 13, 2025

May v. May, 2023-CA-01022-COA, consolidated with 2023-M-01401-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Vacating the chancellor’s order of contempt for failure to pay child support but affirming his denial of the motion to recuse, holding that the chancery court did not have personal jurisdiction for purposes of a contempt ruling for want of service under Rule 81, but that although the chancellor erred in finding that the motion for recusal was untimely it was nevertheless within his discretion to deny it.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in result only without writing)

Fortner v. IMS Engineers, Inc., 2023-CA-01170-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a company that had been engaged to oversee and manage road improvement projects until about ten months before a fatal accident occurred, holding that there was no evidence that the company owed a duty of care once its involvement ended and the City took over the management role.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Carlton did not participate)

Horne v. Dolgencorp LLC, 2024-CA-00376-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a trip-and-fall case after a customer tripped on merchandise in an aisle, holding that there was no evidence that the store had actual or constructive knowledge of the presence of the dangerous condition.
(8-2: Westbrooks and McDonald dissented without writing)

Shipley v. Shipley, 2023-CA-00814-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming judgment modifying the custody arrangement by giving the mother sole physical and legal custody, holding that the chancellor did not err in modifying physical and legal custody based the mother’s relocation to Oregon, that the chancellor’s did not err by failing to consider the totality of the circumstances, that the chancellor did not give undue weight to one Albright factor, and that the argument that the chancellor erred by not sua sponte appointing a GAL to investigate allegations of abuse was procedurally barred, and declining to address child support in after ruling that the chancellor did not err in its custody decision.
(7-3: Wilson dissented, joined by Carlton and Emfinger)

Magyar v. Shiers, 2023-CA-00682-COA (Torts – Other)
Affirming bench trial decision finding the defendant liable for malicious prosecution and awarding compensatory and punitive damages, holding that there was evidence to support each element of malicious prosecution where the defendant had filed charging affidavits against the plaintiffs alleging that they were intentionally damaging his property by allowing sewage from a leaking septic system to run into his property but the justice court dismissed the charges for lack of evidence.
(10-0)

Mueller Industries, Inc. v. Waits, 2023-WC-00494-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Reversing the Commission’s decision ordering a lump sum payment, holding that the information in the record did not permit the Court to review the Commission’s computations of TPD and remanding for the Commission to determine whether TPD was properly calculated and credited, determine whether the claimant received more than the maximum weekly benefit and whether the Employer/Carrier should receive a credit for overpayment, and ensure that the Employer/Carrier was not charged with penalties or interest after the date the Commission found that no further benefits were owed.
(8-2: Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald and joined in part by McCarty)

Other Orders

  • Mount v. State, 2023-KA-00807-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Begnaud v. Begnaud, 2023-CA-00822-COA (denying rehearing)
  • In the Matter of Estate of Tate: Garfield v. Tate, 2023-CA-01262-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

May 20, 2025

Mask v. Baggett, 2024-CA-00181-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decisions denying a motion for contempt and attorney’s fees in a divorce action for lack of proof, holding that the chancellor’s finding that neither party had sufficient proof to support motions for contempt and attorney’s fees was supported by the record and lack of record, that the appellant failed to show that the chancellor abused his discretion by denying the Rule 59 motion due to clear error or manifest injustice.
(10-0)

Bickes v. Swain, 2024-CA-00187-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the mother of the bride and the venue in a premises liability suit filed by a wedding guest who hurt his leg stepping off a porch at the venue, holding that the circuit court did not err in granting summary judgment without conducting a hearing that had been set and that summary judgment was proper because there was no evidence of a dangerous condition that could support liability regardless of whether the plaintiff was classified as a licensee or an invitee.
(7-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Page v. State, 2024-CP-00613-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s rejection of the plaintiff’s motion for discovery in the circuit court in which he was convicted of attacking a woman with a knife two decades ago, holding that the circuit court did not err in rejecting the claim as a standalone claim separate from a PCR petition though the circuit court incorrectly “denied” the motion instead of “dismissing” the motion for lack of personal jurisdiction.
(10-0)

Jones v. State, 2023-KA-01157-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of armed robbery, holding that the circuit court did not commit plain error in excluding evidence of a witness’s prior convictions because the weight of evidence of guilt was overwhelming, that the Miranda violation arguments were procedurally barred and did not merit reversal under the plain error doctrine.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Pickett v. State, 2024-KA-00511-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of burglary of a dwelling with intent to commit a larceny, holding that the issue of the circuit court’s denial of the motions for directed verdict was procedurally barred and lacked merit because the evidence was sufficient and the verdict not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and the circuit court did not err in denying the motions without making specific findings of fact.
(10-0)

Mortera v. Kona Villa Owners Association, Inc., 2023-CA-01297-COA (Civil – Property Damage)
Reversing summary judgment that was entered in favor of an HOA that declined to pursue a property damage claim on behalf of a condo unit owner, holding that based on the bylaws and insurance policy terms there was a genuine fact dispute over the HOA’s status of a fiduciary.
(9-0)

Parrott v. Frierson, 2023-SA-01245-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s dismissal of taxpayers’ petition appealing the Board of Tax Appeals’ order, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the chancellor’s finding that “yard sales” where the taxpayers purchased storage units and sold the contents were not isolated, casual, or occasional sales but sales made in the course of business and subject to sales tax, that the chancellor did not err in finding that the MDOR’s income tax assessment was prima facie correct, that the taxpayers did not overcome the presumption of correctness, and that the chancellor properly affirmed assessment of penalties and interest.
(10-0)

Forrest County General Hospital v. Knight, 2023-WC-01277-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the Commission’s order that affirmed the AJ’s order that the claimant suffered an 80% industrial loss of use of the right leg and reducing it to 60% due to apportionment but reversed the AJ’s finding of no loss of wage-earning capacity and awarded 15% LWEC for the low back injury, holding that under the deferential standard of review there was evidence to support the Commission’s decision.
(10-0)

Roach v. Roach, 2024-CA-00236-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s denial of the ex-wife’s Rule 60(b) motion after the ex-husband was granted a divorce on the grounds of habitual cruel and inhumane treatment, holding that the chancery court did not err in finding that service of process by certified mail was proper and that the ex-wife failed to show exceptional circumstances related to her claim that her prior attorney was ineffective warranting relief under Rule 60(b).
(10-0)

Allen & Smith Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Merrill, 2023-CA-00468-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming summary judgment granted in favor of a former employee in a breach of contract claim alleging violations of a non-compete agreement, holding that the court had appellate jurisdiction even though the judgment did not include the language “no just reason for delay” and that the circuit court did not err in finding certain provisions ambiguous and striking them from the agreement.
(5-5: Carlton and Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes, and McCarty and joined in party by Carlton and Emfinger)

NOTE – I hope this one goes up on cert. My impression is that the holding of the principal opinion would relax the Rule 54(b) standard as it has been enforced. In the meantime, I would not stop putting all of the Rule 54(b) magic language in your judgments.

Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2024-CA-00455-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing summary judgment in favor of the defendant based on judicial estoppel after the plaintiff failed to disclose this personal injury claim in her bankruptcy proceedings, holding that the “acceptance” element of judicial estoppel was not met where the bankruptcy as dismissed without a discharge.
(8-2: Emfinger dissented, joined by Wilson)

Other Orders

  • Culbertson v. State, 2023-KA-00588-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Boone v. State, 2023-KA-00684-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Gibson v. State, 2023-KA-00704-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Grimes v. State, 2023-KA-01254-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Burnette v. State, 2023-CP-01330-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 8, 15, and 22, 2025

After a few weeks of attending to other matters, I am back on the blogging horse. Fortunately, the appellate courts went relatively light on me in terms of the number of decisions handed down.

Summaries the hand downs from the Mississippi Court of Appeals from the past three weeks are below. There are several divorce cases, three mal cases (two opinions reached different results after the respective plaintiff’s expert testimony was struck), several MTCA cases, personal injury cases, felonies, an arbitration case, and more.

April 8, 2025

McFall v. Osborne, 2023-CA-01234-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a divorce action denying the ex-husband’s Rule 60(b) motion attacking the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, holding that the chancellor had subject matter jurisdiction, that the ex-husband could not attack the merits of the underlying judgment because it was not appealed in time, and that the chancellor did not err in finding the ex-husband in contempt for failing to pay as ordered in the underlying judgment.
(9-0: Westbrooks did not participate)

Estate of Boleware v. McPhail, 2024-CA-00156-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming with modification the circuit court’s decision staying litigation and compelling arbitration, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the arbitration agreement was valid but modifying the judgment to clarify that the arbitrator must decide whether the claims are within the scope of the arbitration agreement.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in the result without writing)

Short v. Polles, 2023-CA-00607-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of a farmer’s suit against MDWFP for issuing a permit permitting the farmer to kill deer to protect his soybean field but limiting it to does only, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the agency was immune from suit because permit decisions were within the agency’s power and its actions were not arbitrary and capricious.
(8-2-0: Barnes and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

  • Brooks v. State, 2023-KA-01081-COA (granting pro se motion for time to file motion for rehearing)
  • Bridget v. State, 2025-TS-00100-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of appealable judgment)

Hand Down Page

April 15, 2025

E. Cornell Malone Corp. v. Marshall Cnty. Sch. Dist., 2024-CA-00047-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of a complaint against the County related to a construction project, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the tort claims were barred by the MTCA’s one-year statute of limitations or in denying the motion to amend the complaint.
(9-1-0: Carlton dissented without separate written opinion)

Anderson v. State, 2023-KA-00967-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of murder, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Pinkton v. State, 2024-CP-00655-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the claims were time-barred, waived, and without merit.
(6-4-0: McCarty concurred, joined by Wilson, Emfinger, and Weddle)

Goodson v. State, 2023-KA-00729-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress, in granting the State’s motion in limine preventing the defendant from raising the defense of bias against by the sheriff’s department, or in denying his motion for JNOV or for new trial.
(10-0)

Jordan v. State, 2023-KA-00965-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of shooting into a dwelling after reviewing the record and counsel’s Lindsey brief, holding that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and no issues warranting reversal.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Holifield v. Highland Community Hospital, 2023-CA-01342-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming dismissal of MTCA claims against a community hospital, holding that the trial court did not err in determining that the community hospital was a division of a governmental entity and not a separate entity that could be sued or in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend to substitute the correct governmental entity because the claim would be time-barred.
(7-3-0: Wilson, McDonald, and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Lee v. Doolittle, 2023-CA-00969-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Reversing summary judgment in favor of the defendants in a med mal case, holding that the circuit court abused its discretion in striking the plaintiff’s expert and then in granting summary judgment for lack of expert testimony.
(5-1-4: Wilson concurred in part and in the judgment without writing; Carlton dissented, joined by Barnes, Emfinger, and St. Pe’)

Other Orders

  • Miller v. State, 2023-CP-00322-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Estate of Forkner: Berry v. Forkner, 2023-CA-00707-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

April 22, 2025

Nabors v. State, 2024-KA-00006-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault of law enforcement, holding that there was sufficient evidence of the defendant’s intent to commit aggravated assault, that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not commit plain error in giving a flight instruction, and that trial counsel was not ineffective.
(10-0)

Crocker v. Daves, 2023-CA-00602-COA (Civil – Custody)
Dismissing appeal in a custody matter, holding that the chancellor’s order holding child support in abeyance due to insufficient information before the court to award child support based on statutory guidelines was not a final, appealable order.
(10-0)

Elmore v. Elmore, 2023-CA-00875-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming a judgment granting divorce and dividing marital property, holding that the chancellor did not err in classifying assets as marital property, in determining what property was marital property or in equitably distributing marital assets, or in denying the motion for new trial or to alter or amend the judgment.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and dissented in part; St. Pe’ did not participate)

Mallery v. State, 2024-CP-00220-COA (Civil – PCR)
Dismissing appeal of PCR denial, holding that there was no longer an actual controversy since the petitioner had been released from custody.
(9-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Simmons v. City of Picayune, 2024-CA-00092-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment dismissing a premises liability claim stemming from a fall on a handicap ramp, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact that the curb ramp constituted a dangerous condition.
(10-0)

Cox v. Coast 132 LLC, 2023-CA-01290-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a restaurant in a slip-and-fall case, holding that the windowsill that allegedly caused the fall was not a dangerous condition and that even if it was a dangerous condition the plaintiff could not prove that the restaurant created it or had actual or constructive knowledge of it.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Sandlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 2023-CP-01347-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming dismissal of a pro se UM claim, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the defendant had not been properly served with process and that the statute of limitations on the claim had run.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Younger v. Southern, 2022-CA-01228-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming part and reversing in part the circuit court’s judgment after a bench trial in a personal injury claim under the MTCA, affirming the award for the loss of the plaintiff’s truck, but reversing the award of damages for past, present, and future pain and suffering and reversing the award of $21,120 in medical damages for lack of expert testimony and rendering an award of $399 for past medical expenses.
(7-3: Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald and McCarty; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty)

Calvin-Williams v. The Greenville Clinic, P.A., 2023-CA-01021-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, holding that the circuit court did not err in striking portions of the plaintiff’s expert’s testimony and then granting summary judgment based on the lack of expert testimony.
(8-2: McDonald dissented, joined by Westbrooks)

Other Orders

  • Parker v. State, 2023-KA-00550-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Estate of Roberts: Herd v. Stokes, 2023-CA-00713-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Gardner v. State, 2023-KA-00903-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Lawson v. State, 2023-CP-01008-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Jack v. City of Meridian, 2023-CC-01339-COA (denying pro se motion to recall mandate and dismissing motion for rehearing and amended motion for rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 25, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today and a bonus opinion Thursday of last week. There is a notably high reversal rate in these cases. The decision from last Thursday reversed a conviction of capital murder. The eight decisions handed down today cover personal injury, custody, divorce, felony convictions, wills and estates, and PCR with five of them at least reversing the trial court in part.

February 20, 2025

Roncali v. State, 2023-KA-00173-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of capital murder and remanding for a new trial, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict but that trial court abused its discretion allowing a State’s expert to testify that the manner of death was homicide from a third person injecting methamphetamine into the victim.
Expert Testimony: 8-2 (Carlton dissented as to this issue, joined by Barnes, Lawrence, and St. Pe’)
Sufficiency of the evidence: 8-2 (Carlton concurred as to this issue, joined by Barnes, Lawrence, and St. Pe’; Westbrooks dissented as to this issue, joined by McDonald and joined in party by McCarty who joined the principal opinion)

February 25, 2025

In the Matter of Disbursement of Real Property Assets to Heir and/or The Sale of Real Property: Montgomery v. Whatley, 2022-CP-00992-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing order permitting disbursement of real property one of the decedent’s children, holding that there was insufficient evidence in the record to support the chancellor’s finding that the decedent was the fee simple owner of the tract at issue and remanding to set aside the “Executrix’s Deed” and for further proceedings.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Lawrence did not participate)

Trehern v. Spivey, 2023-CA-01002-COA (Civil – Custody)
Reversing the chancellor’s custody modification order awarding the father legal and physical custody with no visitation awarded to the mother, holding that the chancellor did not find or identify any material change in circumstances, did not separately assess whether the change was adverse to the child’s welfare, and did not make on-the-record findings as to the Albright factors.
(10-0)

Crump v. State, 2023-CP-00795-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding it the motion untimely, successive, and barred by res judicata.
(10-0)

Fairchild v. KS Ocean Springs Real Estate LLC, 2023-CA-00928-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendants in a premises liability case, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in striking an affidavit supporting the plaintiff’s opposition as a discovery violation and did not err in finding that there was no evidence that the defendants had actual or constructive knowledge of a dangerous condition.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Black v. Black, 2023-CA-01098-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s order modifying custody in favor of the father, holding that the mother’s appeal of the modification judgment was not timely and therefore barred and that the trial court did not err in denying her relief from the judgment under Rule 60(b).
(10-0)

Practice Point – The Court noted that the Rule 60(b) motion filed more than ten days after the judgment does not toll the time for filing an appeal:

Colbert v. Colbert, 2022-CA-01293-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s decision denying the husband’s claim for divorce and granting the wife’s request for separate maintenance and child support, holding that the husband’s argument that the antenuptial agreement bars a grant of separate maintenance was procedurally barred for failure to present it to the trial court but reversing on the child support issue because the chancellor did not make the required findings of fact.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Star v. State, 2023-KA-00788-COA (Civil – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing/rendering in part after the defendant was convicted of aggravated assault and being a felon in possession of a weapon, holding that the indictment and jury instruction for felon in possession of a weapon were deficient for failing to include the elements and reversing the conviction of felon in possession, but holding that the trial court did not err regarding the aggravated assault jury instruction.
(7-2-1: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Barnes concurred in result only without writing; Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part)

Roberts v. Roberts, 2023-CA-00934-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s equitable division of the marital estate and award of alimony, holding that the chancellor erred in valuing the husband’s business and other assets which required remand on both the equitable division and alimony decisions.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Alexander v. Metropolitan Y.M.C.A., 20233-CP-01092-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Magee v. State, 2023-CP-00008-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Chung v. State, 2023-CA-00362-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Doukas v. Kiln Self Storage, 2023-WC-01195-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 21, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. There is a pair of direct criminal appeals, a pair of PCR decisions, a custody decision, and an adverse possession decision.

Burnette v. State, 2023-CP-01330-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary dismissal of PCR motion, holding that it was time-barred.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Moore v. State, 2024-CP-00150-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that it was time-barred and successive.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Grimes v. State, 2023-KA-01254-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter and sentence after remand for an evidentiary hearing on alleged juror misconduct, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that no conduct by a juror prejudiced the defendant.
(8-0: Weddle and St. Pe’ did not participate)

Adams v. Adams, 2023-CA-01041-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s custody ruling in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in applying the Albright factors and determining that it was in the children’s best interest to award sole physical custody to the mother.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Robinson v. State, 2023-KA-00575-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that in light of overwhelming evidence of guilt the defendant failed to show that his trial counsel was ineffective for introducing a recording between an officer and a witness.
(7-2-0: Barnes concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in result only without writing; St. Pe’ did not participate)

Phillips v. Forrest County Industrial Park Commission, 2023-CA-01132-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s finding that the Commission acquired title to two acres of land by adverse possession and dismissing counterclaims, holding that the Commission proved the elements of adverse possession and that as a result the appellants’ counterclaims for trespass, unlawful withholding possession, and unjust enrichment were properly dismissed.
(6-3-0: Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • None

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 14, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. Most are direct criminal appeals. There is also a judgment versus voluntary payment case, a contempt issue in a divorce case, a disinheritance case, and an injunction case.

Seales v. State, 2023-KA-01376-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted first-degree murder, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support to conviction.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Holstein v. Nicholas, 2023-CA-00548-COA consolidated with 2023-CA-00972 (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision ordering repayment of sums paid pursuant to an Ohio judgment enrolled in Mississippi after the Ohio judgment was overturned on appeal, holding that the evidence was not sufficient to determine whether the amount paid was a voluntary payment or a compulsory payment.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Baker v. State, 2023-KA-01111-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s proposed self-defense jury instruction because there was no evidence to support it.
(8-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only; St. Pe’ did not participate.)

In the Matter of the Estate of Tate: Garfield v. Tate, 2023-CA-01262-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision disinheriting a father, holding that the father did not prove he should inherit under Miss. Code Ann. section 91-1-15(3)(d)(i).
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Gibson v. State, 2023-KA-00704-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error by allowing the defendant’s wife to testify against him and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-1-0: Lawrence concurred, joined by Barnes and joined in part by Westbrooks and Weddle; St. Pe’ did not participate)

Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00178-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault with a weapon and felon in possession, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence of a witness’s prior convictions for forgery in violation of the defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Yarbrough v. Sacred Heart Catholic School of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 2023-CA-01219-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings granting temporary and permanent injunctive relief in favor of a school, holding that there was a legally cognizable claim based on its right to take precautions necessary to minimize foreseeable risks to protect students, that the chancellor did not err in finding that there was a threat to the school, and that the chancellor did not abuse her discretion in issuing the preliminary and permanent injunction.
(8-1: Wilson dissented; St. Pe’ did not participate)

Powell v. Powell, 2022-CA-01258-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision finding the mother in contempt in a divorce matter for failing to pay her half of children’s medical bills, holding that the chancellor did not violate the judgment of divorce, that the finding of contempt was not manifest error, and the the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in any of the evidentiary rulings.
(7-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence and St. Pe’ did not participate)

Stewart v. State, 2023-KA-00461-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of armed carjacking and three counts of armed robbery, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the motion for mistrial based on improper questioning during cross-exam of the defendant’s mother because it was waived and that the improper question was cured by jury instructions and that the defendant’s Confrontation Clause rights were not violated where a police officer testified via closed-circuit TV.
(7-2-0: Barnes and Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

  • LaFleur v. State, 2022-KA-00500-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Georgen v. Estate of Brown-Barrett, 2023-CA-000344-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Fox v. Allen Automotive, Inc., 2023-CA-00441-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Patton v. State, 2023-CP-00618-COA (recalling mandate and allowing pro se motion for rehearing to proceed on the merits)
  • Mallard v. State, 2023-CP-01155-COA (recalling mandate and allowing pro se motion for rehearing to proceed on the merits)

Hand Down Page