Tag: Felony

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 18, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions on Thursday, January 18. Of the four, there were three direct criminal appeals and the fourth was an appeal in a money dispute between a county and a school district.

Douglas v. State, 2022-KA-00859-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sale of cocaine and life sentence as habitual offender, holding that the defendant waived defective indictment argument by failing to object in the trial court, that the argument that his indictment was improper because his name was incorrect was barred and without merit, that the defendant was not denied the right to represent himself because he never asked to, that the judge did not err by not recusing sua sponte, that witness credibility was for the jury to determine, that the defendant’s Fourth Amendment arguments were barred and without merit, that there was no merit to the defendant’s chain-of-custody argument, that there was no merit to the defendant’s Brady claim, that the defendant’s arguments about the amount of the controlled substance were without merit, that the defendant’s Confrontation Clause argument was barred and without merit, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the defendant’s argument that his right to a public trial was not violated where the jury deliberated and returned a verdict after business hours, and that the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim was without merit.
(9-0)

Davis v. State, 2022-KA-00696-SCT, consolidated with Jackson v. State, 2022-KA-00731-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of two counts of first-degree murder but vacating a portion of the sentences, holding that the firearm-enhancement portion of the sentences was prohibited because a greater minimum sentence (life sentence) was otherwise provided for, but holding that under the plain error doctrine there was no evidence the defendants did not receive a fair trial by an impartial jury where the Batson challenge procedure was not followed to determine if the race-neutral reason was pretextual, that the verdict supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not err in denying one defendant’s motion to server, and the cumulative errors doctrine did not require reversal.
(6-3: Kitchens dissented, joined by King and Ishee; King dissented, joined by Kitchens and Ishee)

Clarke County, Mississippi v. Quitman School District, 2022-CA-00471-SCT (Civil – Other)
Reversing on direct appeal and on cross appeal in a case about whether a school district was entitled to funds recovered by a county from the bankruptcy proceedings of a delinquent taxpayer, holding that the statutory scheme for funding public schools does not entitle school districts to receive delinquent taxes recovered years later in bankruptcy proceedings that are outside of the statutory scheme so the chancellor erred in awarding the school district a portion of the funds.
(9-0)

Stewart v. State, 2022-KA-00107-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic the trial court was within its discretion to have the defendant attend a pretrial, tender-years hearing virtually; that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence; that issues related to jury instructions were barred for failure to object and there was no plain error; and that the trial court did not err in sustaining the State’s objection to certain lines of questions while defense counsel was cross-examining witnesses.
(6-3: Kitchens concurred in result only, joined by King and Ishee)

Other Orders

In Re: State Intervention Courts Advisory Committee, 89-R-99039-SCT (approving the designation of Katharine Surkin, Director of the Administrative Office of the Courts, of Justice Robert P. Chamberlin as Chair of the State Intervention Courts Advisory Committee and the following as members through December 31, 2024: Judge Michael M. Taylor, Judge Winston L. Kidd, Judge Robert Helfrich, Judge Charles E. Webster, Judge Kathy King Jackson, Judge Randi P. Mueller, Representative Angela Cockerham, Nathan Blevins Deputy Commissioner of Community Corrections, MDOC, Mark Smith, Executive Director, State Veterans Affairs Board, Andrea Sanders, Commissioner, Miss. Department of Child Protection Services, and Consuelo Walley, Coordinator, Jones County Drug Ct, 18th Judicial Circuit, and further designating the following alternate members who may attend and vote in the absence of an appointed committee member: Judge Mary “Betsy” Cotton, Judge Mike Dickinson, and Judge Walt Brown.

Cochran v. State, 2014-M-00090 (denying “Request for Post-Conviction Forensic, DNA, and Handwriting Testing,” finding that the filing was frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings may be sanctioned)

Trest v. State, 2021-CT-00968-SCT (denying cert)

Jackson Pub. Sch. Dist. v. Jackson Federation of Teachers and PSRPS, 2022-CA-00464-SCT (denying cert)

Brent v. MDHS, 2022-CT-00529-SCT (granting cert)

In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2024-AD-00001-SCT (directing the disbursement of $215,281.86 in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services.

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 16, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions on Tuesday. The Court covered a lot of subject matter including trusts, unemployment benefits, workers’ comp, and several direct appeals of criminal convictions.

Rutland v. Regions Bank, 2022-CA-00720-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of a trustee who filed a dec action seeking a judgment that the trust did not have to pay funeral expenses, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the trust was irrevocable, was not terminated by a subsequent divorce, and that the contents of the trust should be disbursed to the children.
(10-0)

Black v. State, 2022-KA-01101-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder based on robbery, holding that the circuit court did not err in rejecting the defendant’s manslaughter instruction, in sustaining the State’s objection to defense counsel calling a detective a “liar” during closing, or in not issuing a cautionary instruction regarding the written transcript of the defendant’s interview with law enforcement.
(8-1-1: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Coe Law Firm PLLC v. MDES, 2022-CC-01285-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s order dismissing the employer’s appeal of the MDES Board of Review’s order upholding the ALJ’s grant of unemployment benefits, holding that the employer failed to show good cause for not appearing at the ALJ de novo hearing and that issues of misconduct by the employee were therefore moot.
(10-0)

Jones v. State, 2022-KA-01199-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted aggravated assault with a firearm enhancement, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Simmons v. State, 2022-KA-01260-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of receiving stolen property and first-degree murder, holding that the circuit did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for JNOV where the evidence was sufficient for both conviction and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

MTD Products, Inc. v. Moore, 2023-WC-00199-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s award of PPD for 50 weeks for an upper-left extremity injury, holding that substantial evidence support the MWCC’s finding that the claimant sustained a 25% industrial loss of use that exceeded her 15% functional medical impairment where the claimant’s job duties had to be modified and she was reassigned to different tasks after her injury.
(10-0)

Vlasak v. State, 2022-CP-01211-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Dismissing appeal of the circuit court’s denial of a motion for reconsideration after denying the defendant’s motion to modify sentence that was filed after a guilty plea that was filed after the term of court ended, holding that that the circuit court correctly found that this was essentially a direct appeal after a guilty plea.
(10-0)

Gilmer v. State, 2022-KM-00257-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision affirming the county court’s order dismissing an appeal of a conviction in justice court of willfully discharging a firearm towards a dwelling and disturbing the peace, holding that there was no error in dismissing the appeal after the defendant failed to appear at his trial de novo.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Emfinger did not participate)

Other Orders

Smith v. State, 2020-KA-00774-COA (denying rehearing)

White v. State, 2021-KA-00818-COA (denying rehearing)

Hobby v. Ott, 2021-CA-01305-COA (denying rehearing)

Ndicu v. Gacheri, 2022-CA-00415-COA (denying rehearing)

Wheeler v. Miss. Limestone Corp., 2022-WC-00534-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 11, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions and entered an impressive sixteen “other orders” today. The opinions are a direct criminal appeal, an ecclesiastical abstention case, a precedent-overruling PCR case, and a contract case deciding whether a post-mediation agreement was enforceable. Among the sixteen other orders is an order amending Rule 54 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure that civil practitioners should note.

Hawkins v. State, 2022-KA-01250-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that there was sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find based on the totality of the circumstances that the defendant was in a position of trust or authority over the victim.
(9-0)

Melton v. Union Hill Missionary Baptist Church, 2022-CA-00737-SCT (Civil – Other)
Reversing and vacating the chancery court’s judgment in a dispute over whether a church had been removed its pastor, holding that the doctrine of ecclesiastical abstention put this question outside of the chancery court’s jurisdiction and that the well-meaning chancellor violated the Mississippi Constitution and the Establishment Clause when he personally moderated a congregational meeting to hold a second vote on the pastor and declared the church’s sanctuary a courtroom.
(9-0)

NOTE – The Court also had this to say about the congregational meeting:

Ronk v. State, 2021-DR-00269-SCT (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion for relief from judgment or for leave to file successive petition for PCR that included an ineffective assistance claim, overruling Grayson v. State to the extent it excepted ineffective-assistance-of-post-conviction-counsel claims from the UPCCRA’s bars in death-penalty cases, based on the recent Howell decision.
(6-3: Kitchens dissented, joined by King and Ishee)

Logan v. RedMed, LLC, 2022-CA-00669-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the trial court’s judgment enforcing a settlement following a mediation, holding that the proposed settlement agreement that resulted from the mediation lacked material terms required by Mississippi contract law.
(6-3: Chamberlin dissented, joined by Maxwell and Beam)

Other Orders

In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (amending Rule 54, effective January 18, 2024)

NOTE – Here is the amended text of Rule 54(d):

And here is the amended Advisory Committee Historical Note:

In Re: The Rules of Discipline for the Mississippi Bar, 89-R-99010-SCT (appointing or reappointing Hon. Eleanor Faye Peterson, Clarence Webster III, Jackye C. Bertucci, Hon. Mark A. Maples, Hon. Celeste E. Wilson, and Charles Elliott Winfield as complaint tribunal members for three-year terms from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2026)

Flynt v. State, 2016-M-00862 (denying PCR motion, finding the motion frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings might result in sanctions)

Williams v. State, 2016-M-01063 (denying PCR motion, finding the motion frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings might result in sanctions)

Cavitt v. State, 2018-M-00197 (denying PCR motion, finding the motion frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings might result in sanctions)

Ronk v. State, 2021-DR-00269-SCT (denying motion for relief from judgment or leave to file successive PCR petition)

Howard Industries, Inc. v. Hayes, 2021-CT-00694, consolidated with 2021-CT-00695 (granting appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees for additional services provided and denying rehearing)

Christian v. State, 2021-M-00807 (denying PCR motion, finding the motion frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings might result in sanctions)

Priceline.com, LLC v. Fitch, 2021-CA-00868-SCT (denying rehearing)

Johnson v. Johnson, 2021-CT-01080-SCT (denying cert)

Ehrhardt v. State, 2021-CT-01143-SCT (denying cert)

Pearson v. Eubanks, 2022-CT-00011-SCT (granting cert)

Brown v. State, 2022-CT-00069-SCT (denying cert)

Roosa v. Roosa, 2022-CT-00128-SCT (denying cert)

Tarvin v. State, 2022-M-00260 (denying PCR motion, finding the motion frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings might result in sanctions)

The Mississippi Bar v. Russell, 2023-BD-00843-SCT (granting petition to transfer lawyer to disability inactive status)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 2, 2024

Happy New Year! The Mississippi Court of Appeals wasted no time getting back in the game this year and handed down two opinions today. One is a direct appeal of a criminal conviction of multiple counts of video voyeurism and the other is a decision on unusual facts from hearings related to the enforcement of a judgment.

Moore v. State, 2022-KA-00327-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of fifteen counts of video voyeurism and one count of video voyeurism of a child under sixteen, holding that the trial court did not err in declining to suppress all of the State’s evidence because “simple mistakes made in the process of the issuance of the two search warrants” related to identifying which suite the subject restroom was in; that the evidence was sufficient to find that the incidental recording of males was “lewd, licentious, or indecent” and that the evidence was sufficient to prove the necessary element of lack of permission as to the victims who did not testify.
(10-0)

Pierce v. Sorrells, 2022-CP-01290-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the trial court’s decisions on dueling petitions to unseal a judgment (by obligee) and to set the judgment aside (by obligor), holding that the obligor was served with process on the petition to unseal, but holding that the obligor’s due process rights were violated when he was instructed by the court not to open his mouth again before he was able to testify and remanding for full hearing on the merits, and reversing the trial court’s judgment ordering the obligor incarcerated until he purged himself of contempt.
(6-1-3: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Lawrence and Smith, and joined in part by McCarty.)

NOTE – Here is the potion of the opinion recounting the hearing:

Other Orders

None

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 12, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight decisions on Tuesday that cover a lot of territory. There is something for just about everybody.

Read on down for a case that underscores the importance of keeping up with the weekly hand downs from the Mississippi Supreme Court and Mississippi Court of Appeals. (Subscribing to this blog probably doesn’t hurt you in that endeavor.)

Coogan v. Nationwide Prop. and Cas. Ins. Co., 2022-CA-01063-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming partial summary judgment in policy holders’ suit against their auto liability carrier, holding that the carrier had an arguably reasonable basis to support its claims handling the circuit court did not err in finding that there was no genuine issue of material fact on the bad faith punitive damages claim or the Veasley damages claim.
(6-2-1: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing, Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing, McDonald dissented without writing, Lawrence did not participate)

Forrest v. State, 2022-KA-00844-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and that the court did not admit inadmissible hearsay or irrelevant evidence, and dismissing the ineffective assistance of counsel claim without prejudice.
(10-0)

Hills v. Manns, 2022-CA-00774-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming modification of visitation schedule, holding that the chancellor did not err in not dismissing the mother’s petition on the basis of res judicata, not awarding him attorney’s fees, or in awarding the mother final decision-making authority.
(10-0)

Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2022-CA-01240-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing the trial court’s dismissal of a personal injury lawsuit on judicial estoppel grounds, holding that the case should be remanded to allow the circuit court to apply the test from a recent Mississippi Supreme Court decision that was handed down after the circuit court’s ruling.
(10-0)

PRACTICE POINT – This case illustrates the importance of keeping up with decisions handed down weekly by Mississippi’s appellate courts. (By extension, this case illustrates why you and all of your friends should subscribe to the Mississippi Appeals Blog – I covered the Saunders decision here when it was handed down.)

PRACTICE POINT (continued): Though the Mississippi Supreme Court’s decision in Saunders was handed down after the summary judgment order was entered, the Supreme Court’s decision in Jones, infra, with its special concurrence, was handed down before the summary judgment proceedings. So the precedential special concurrence in Jones that controlled this case was in force during the summary judgment proceedings. This case serves as a good reminder that special concurrences that garner a majority of the court have the force of precedent. (Another shameless plug: I covered the Jones decision here when it was handed down and specifically discussed the precedential value of the special concurrence.)

Barefield v. Barefield, 2022-CA-00834-COA (Civil – Torts-Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s order requiring the former member/owner of an investment company to pay a forensic accountant’s fee for services during litigation among all members/owners, holding that the exert was court-appointed and the chancellor had discretion to order the party whose actions necessitated the lawsuit to pay the fees.
(8-2-0: McCarty concurred in part and in result without writing; Wilson concurred in result only without writing)

Henderson v. State, 2022-KA-00661-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Nichols v. State, 2022-KA-00202-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of first-degree murder and remanding for new trial, holding that the circuit court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the “castle doctrine,” while also holding that the evidence to support the conviction was legally sufficient so the remedy was a new trial.
(10-0)

Miss. Dept. of Human Servs. v. Johnson, 2022-SA-00605-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision voiding a 2002 paternity and child-support order was void for insufficient service of process, holding that in light of MDHS’s admission that failed to effect proper service under Rule 81(d) MDHS’s arguments under the doctrine of laches, judicial estoppel, unjust enrichment, and public policy failed.
(6-4: Greenlee dissented, joined by Wilson, Lawrence, and Emfinger)

Other Orders

Gillen v. Gillen, 2021-CA-00837-COA (granting motion for appellate attorneys’ fees)

Moore v. State, 2022-KA-00327-COA (granting appearance as counsel, but denying motion to substitute and motion to file supplemental brief)

Diming v. State, 2022-KA-00412-COA (recalling mandate and granting motion for time to file motion for rehearing)

Russell v. State, 2022-KA-00447-COA (recalling mandate and granting motion for time to file motion for rehearing)

Greater Hamilton Grove Baptist Church v. Hamilton Grove Missionary Baptist Church, 2022-CA-00518-COA (denying rehearing)

Rehabilitation Centers, Inc. v. Williams, 2023-WC-00453-COA (denying motion for reconsideration)

Mitchell v. State, 2023-TS-00764-COA (granting motion to proceed out-of-time)

Robinson v. State, 2023-TS-00935-COA (dismissing untimely appeal)

Britton v. State, 2023-TS-01060-COA (dismissing untimely appeal)

Rutherford v. State, 2023-TS-01066-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of appealable judgment)

Rutherford v. State, 2023-TS-01069-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of appealable judgment)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 30, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions today. There is a case addressing a county’s decisions regarding license and tax exception, an appeal of the denial of a petition for a certificate of rehabilitation to regain the right to possess firearms, and a direct criminal appeal that resulted in a 5-4 decision.

Stokes v. Jackson Sales & Storage Company, 2022-CA-00371-SCT (Civil -Other)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the circuit court’s rulings in a licensing and tax dispute, holding the company’s license is and has been valid since issuance, the license is subject to renewal, the County forfeited its right to taxes during the years it had granted an exemption, and the County had discretion to grant (or not grant) the exemption.
(9-0)

Francis v. State, 2022-CA-00964-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a petition for a certificate of rehabilitation to restore the right to possess a firearm after felony conviction, holding that the denial of a certificate of rehabilitation is an appealable order, but that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in denying the certificate and that no hearing was required.
(9-0)

Gunn v. State, 2022-KA-00807-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first degree murder, attempted murder, aggravated assault, and shooting into a dwelling, holding that the trial court did not err by granting a jury instruction allowing an inference of deliberate design and that the verdict was not contrary to the weight of the evidence.
(5-4: Coleman dissented, joined by Kitchens, King, and Ishee)

Note – Here is what the majority said about the jury instruction at issue:

And here is the dissent’s conclusion:

Other Orders

Miller v. Board of Trustees of Second Baptist Church of Starkville, 2020-CT-01384-SCT (denying cert)

Kirk v. Newton, 2021-CT-00684-SCT (denying cert)

Durr v. State, 2021-CT-01109-SCT (granting cert)

Parker v. Canton Manor, 2022-CT-00206-SCT (denied cert)

Francis v. State, 2022-CA-00964-SCT (denying motion to dismiss appeal)

Wilson v. State, 2023-M-00633 (denying application for leave to file PCR motion, finding that the filing is frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings may result in sanctions)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 21, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions on Tuesday. There are some interesting opinions in there including three opinions with civil procedure issues that civil litigators should take a look at. One deals with the discovery rule and the savings statute after a voluntary dismissal, another deals with a Rule 41 dismissal for want of prosecution, and the other deals with a Rule 56(f) motion in a med mal case.

The Supreme Court will not hand down decisions this week due to the Thanksgiving holiday. Have a Happy Thanksgiving!

Burns v. BancorpSouth Bank, 2022-CA-00404-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming dismissal of breach of contract and negligence claims that two banks were liable for not preventing an elderly lady’s caregiver from stealing money from bank accounts, holding that the claims against the banks were barred by the three-year statute of limitations.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Greenlee did not participate)

Harper v. State, 2022-KA-00659-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted statutory rape and fondling, holding that the trial court did not err by admitting the victim’s out-of-court statements without determining whether the tender-years exception applied because the victim’s teacher’s testimony about what the victim said was not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted and that the forensic interviewing expert’s testimony did not constitute hearsay, and dismissing the ineffective assistance of counsel claims without prejudice.
(8-2-0: Enfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing and McDonald concurred in the result only without writing)

Agee v. State, 2022-KA-00994-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the Court did not err by imposing restitution and that the defendant waived that issue by not objecting during sentencing.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing)

Clearman v. Pipestone Property Services, LLC, 2022-CA-00651-COA (Civil – Personal injury)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of slip-and-fall claims against a contractor and subcontractor who provided snow and ice removal services for a grocery store on statute of limitations grounds, holding that the “discovery rule” did not apply, the voluntary dismissal of a timely federal court lawsuit against the grocery store did not bring the claims against the contractor and subcontractor within the ambit of the “savings statute,” and the doctrine of equitable tolling did not apply.
(10-0)

Galvan v. State, 2022-KA-00655-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of statutory rape, sexual battery, gratification of lust, and incest, holding that the trial court did not err by not appointing an interpreter or by admitting the defendant’s statements to law enforcement, that the defendant waived objections based on the Confrontation Clause, that there was sufficient evidence to support the incest conviction, and that the defendant failed to prove ineffective assistance of counsel.
(9-1-0: Carlton concurred in result only without writing)

Rawlings v. Rawlings, 2022-CA-00919-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s denial of the ex-wife’s request for attorney’s fees after denying the ex-husband’s request for alimony modification, holding that she was not entitled to attorney’s fees under the marital dissolution agreement providing that the prevailing party in an enforcement action was entitled to attorney’s fees because this was an action to “modify” the agreement not “enforce” it.
(10-0)

Scott v. UnitedHealthcare of Mississippi, Inc., 2022-CA-00963-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming dismissal for want of prosecution where an 18-month period of inactivity followed the filing of the compliant, interrupted only by some activity prompted by the circuit clerk’s notice of intent to dismiss under Rule 41, that then followed by another 18-month period of inactivity and a second Rule 41 notice, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the case even though the plaintiff filed a “Motion to Leave Case on the Docket” after the second Rule 41 notice and that the Court otherwise had inherent power to dismiss for want of prosecution.
(8-2-0: McDonald and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

NOTE – The Court was not persuaded by the plaintiff’s efforts to assign blame to the COVID pandemic. The plaintiff argued:

The Court addressed this argument later in the opinion:

Hogan v. Hattiesburg Clinic, P.A., 2022-CA-00650-COA (Civil – Medical Malpractice)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of the plaintiffs’ 56(f) motion filed the day before the motion for summary judgment hearing, holding that the plaintiffs’ 56(f) motion did not mention the need to obtain additional expert medical opinions and the plaintiffs had not otherwise shown that additional expert opinion could establish proximate cause.
(8-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Carlton did not participate.)

Other Orders

Love v. State, 2021-CP-01101-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 16, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions today. There is a lengthy personal jurisdiction case, a direct criminal appeal, a circuit vs. chancery jurisdiction dispute, and a death-penalty PCR decision.

K&C Logistics, LLC v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., 2022-CA-00939-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming judgment of the circuit court finding no personal jurisdiction in a negligence case stemming from a car wreck in Arizona, holding that the Mississippi Business Corporation Act did not confer personal jurisdiction by virtue of the foreign corporation being registered to do business in Mississippi and that the defendant did not waive the personal jurisdiction defense when its attorneys entered appearances that did not expressly reserve the right to assert the personal jurisdiction defense.
(9-0)

Practice Point – This decision has a lengthy discussion of personal jurisdiction that is worth your time to read. On the waiver issue, the Court clarified persistent confusion over “special appearances” as follows:

Lollis v. State, 2022-KA-00711-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of murder and conspiracy to commit murder, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict on both counts.
(9-0)

Riverhills Capital Corporation v. At Home Care, Inc., 2022-IA-00568-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a motion to transfer a breach of contract, fraud, and quite title claim to chancery court, holding that the plaintiffs had sufficiently pleaded legal claims the circuit court did not err in denying the request to transfer to chancery court even if it is a “close call” and if the legal claims were ultimately found to be without merit.
(9-0)

Note – The Supreme Court said this about circuit court jurisdiction:

Bennett v. State, 2021-CA-01313-SCT (Civil – Death Penalty – PCR)
Affirming the denial of a PCR petition, holding that Cronic did not apply and there was no per se ineffective assistance, that the trial court’s refusal to allow the petitioner to depose two proffered witnesses did not affect the outcome of the trial, and that the petitioner failed to show ineffective assistance of counsel.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Smith v. State, 2021-CT-01003-SCT (granting cert)

Dawson v. Burgs, 2021-CT-01038-SCT (denying cert)

Baker v. State, 2021-CT-01277-SCT (denying cert)

McFarland v. State, 2021-CT-01311-SCT (denying cert)

Fagan v. Faulkner, 2022-CT-00130-SCT (granting cert)

The Mississippi Bar v. Hessler, 2023-BD-00057-SCT (granting emergency motion to clarify opinion to clarify that Hessler is authorized to continue practicing law in Mississippi while his one-year-and-a-day suspension remains in deferred status) *The “motion to clarify” is a handy item to keep in one’s tool belt. It was used here to get a result that had a significant impact on the movant.

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 14, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. They cover custody, personal injury, felonies, and PCR. One of the personal injury cases stems from an injury sustained during a “TikTok challenge” in a classroom.

Croom v. State, 2022-KA-00598-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of a dwelling and conspiracy to commit burglary of a dwelling, holding that the trial court did not err by refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of trespass and that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction of conspiracy.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Snyder v. Estate of Cockrell, 2022-CA-00597-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming summary judgment in a negligence case a man filed against his grandfather’s estate after a child caused the grandfather’s golf cart to run into the plaintiff, holding that in the plaintiff could not prove a breach of duty where there was only speculation about the grandfather’s conduct after he finished operating the golf cart.
(8-2-0: McDonald concurred in part and in result without written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in result only with separate written opinion)

Johnson v. State, 2022-CP-01186-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the petitioner failed to present evidence other than his bare assertions that his plea was involuntary and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in not granting the petitioner an evidentiary hearing.
(10-0)

Scott v. Le, 2022-CA-00887-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s custody award, holding that the chancellor’s finding that there was a material change in circumstances and the chancellor’s application of the Albright factors to to deny the mother’s request for sole physical custody and grant the father’s request for sole physical custody was supported by substantial evidence.
(10-0)

Taylor v. State, 2022-KA-01042-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted murder and two counts of possession of a controlled substance, holding that evidence of prior arrests did not constitute evidence of prior bad acts under Rule 404(a) because it was offered as the foundation of a witness’s identification of the defendant and that would have been otherwise admissible under the exception in 404(b), that it passed the 403 balancing and, even if it was not admissible, it would have been harmless error.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Brown v. State, 2022-KA-00446-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and shooting into a vehicle, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions, that the defendant waived the issue of the judge’s refusal of a second-degree murder instruction when trial counsel did not object and agreed with the judge’s decision, and there was no merit to the claim that a clinical and forensic psychological expert was pressured into proceeding with an independent psychological examination without all of the records he had requested.
(10-0)

Bumpous v. Tishomingo County School District, 2022-CA-01010-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the school district in a negligent supervision after a student was injured in a class room after falling victim to a “TikTok challenge,” holding that that the injury was not reasonable foreseeable and there was no genuine issue of material fact that would warrant reversal of the summary judgment.
(6-2-2: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without written opinion; McCarty dissented, joined by Carlton, and joined in part by Westbrooks and McDonald)

Other Orders

Smith v. State, 2026-KA-01946-COA (denying pro se motion to recall mandate and allow untimely motion for rehearing)

Hall v. State, 2022-CP-01097-COA (recalling mandate and allowing appellant’s timely pro se motion for rehearing to proceed on the merits)

McGee v. State, 2023-KA-00083-COA (remanding to the circuit court for forty-five days for a hearing consistent with Mississippi Rule of Appellate Procedure 6(c)(2) and an order)

Patton v. State, 2023-TS-00618-COA (allowing timely appeal to proceed on the Court’s own motion)

Crump v. State, 2023-TS-00795-COA (allowing timely appeal to proceed on the Court’s own motion)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of October 19, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions on Thursday. There is an appeal of a life imprisonment sentence, an appeal of a sanction in a workers’ comp case, and an appeal of an order compelling arbitration in a construction contract dispute.

Harris v. State, 2022-KA-01113-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming resentencing to life for depraved heart murder, holding that the sentence to life imprisonment was not mandatory but within the trial court’s discretion under the sentencing guidelines.
(9-0)

Howard Industries, Inc. v. Hayes, 2021-CT-00694-SCT (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming sanction against the employer’s attorney, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s award of sanctions related to the presentation of an expert report that was prepared based on representations the attorney made to the expert.
(5-4: Beam dissented, joined by Coleman, Maxwell, and Chamberlin)

McInnis Electric Company v. Brasfield & Gorrie, LLC, 2021-CA-01115-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming order compelling arbitration in a breach of contract suit filed by a subcontractor against the prime contractor, holding that the parties entered into an arbitration agreement and that the subcontractor’s claims were within the arbitration agreement.
(6-2: Kitchens dissented, joined by King; Randolph did not participate)

NOTE – The underlying dispute between the subcontractor and prime contractor is intertwined with the arrival of COVID-19 in Mississippi. Kitchens’s dissent asserted that the ability to perform a contract during the pandemic was not within the contemplated scope of the arbitration agreement that did not contain a force majeure clause.

Other Orders

Williams v. Mississippi District Council for Assemblies of God, 2021-CA-01007-SCT (rehearing denied)

Everett v. State, 2021-CT-01415-SCT (denying cert)

In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2023-AD-00001-SCT (directing the disbursement of $137,218.03 in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services)

Hand Down Page