Tag: Felony

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of December 12, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions today. One ends a chapter in the NCAA-Ole Miss saga, one is an interesting case discussing administrative remedies exhaustion and exclusive remedy immunity under the MWCA, and the other is a direct criminal appeal reversing the Court of Appeals and reinstating a conviction.

NCAA v. Farrar, 2023-IA-00282-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of the NCAA’s motion for summary judgment, holding that there was no evidence in the record to support the plaintiff’s due process and malicious interference with employment claims.
(6-1: Randolph dissented dubitante; Coleman and Maxwell did not participate)

Harris v. Hemphill Construction Company, Inc., 2023-CA-00973-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the trial court’s decision dismissing a work-related personal injury claim by an employee/officer of a subcontractor against a general contractor, holding that the plaintiff was not required to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing a negligence suit but that the defendant-GC was entitled to exclusive remedy immunity from the plaintiff’s suit because the GC required the subcontractor to carry comp coverage and plaintiff was an officer of the subcontract who rejected workers’ comp coverage for himself.
(9-0)

Practice Point – This is case is worth a deeper dive:

Harris then filed the negligence lawsuit and the Mississippi Supreme Court held that the GC was entitled to exclusive remedy immunity:

The Court concluded:

Quinn v. State, 2022-CT-00962-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing the Court of Appeals and reinstating the circuit court’s judgment and conviction of sexual battery, holding that the State sufficiently proved venue, that expert DNA testimony was properly admitted, that the indictment was properly amended, that the trial court did not err by not granting a mistrial sua sponte during closing arguments, and that the trial court did nto err by allowing the State to use birth certificates to refresh a witness’s memory.
(7-2: Kitchens dissented, joined by King)

Other Orders

  • Howard v. State, 2022-KA-00430-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Crawford v. East Mississippi State Hospital, Inc., 2022-CT-00753-SCT (denying cert)
  • Course v. State, 2022-CT-00760-SCT (denying cert)
  • Collins v. Collins, 2022-CT-00903-SCT (denying cert)
  • McLellan v. McLellan, 2022-CT-01006-SCT (denying cert)
  • McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2022-CT-01175-SCT (denying cert)
  • Designer Custom Homes, LLC v. U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies, LLC, 2023-CT-00207-SCT (denying cert)
  • Deep South Today v. Bryant, 2024-M-00659-SCT (denying petition for interloc)
  • McPhail v. McPhail, 2024-TS-00849 (denying motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissing bond-related request without prejudice, and granting request to enlarge the notice of appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 10, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. Six are direct criminal appeals and one is a real property/default judgment case. One of the cases involves a crossbow and included a visual aid.

Nailer v. State, 2023-KA-00627-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault after he fired a crossbow into an occupied vehicle, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a requested instruction of simple assault as a lesser-included offense, that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, and that instructions given did not impermissibly comment on the weight of the evidence were not argumentative and did not deprive the defendant of a fair and objective consideration by the jury, and that the defendant was not deprived of his right to testify.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

NOTE – An appendix to the opinion has a photo of the scene:

Young v. Martin, 2023-CA-00980-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision denying a motion to set aside a default judgment in an action to quiet title and confirm a tax title, holding that the complaint signed by an attorney was a “sworn complaint” for purposes of Miss. Code Ann. § 11-17-1, that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion denying a Rule 60 motion or in deciding that the proper parties were notified of the tax sale.
(7-2: Westbrooks and McDonald dissented without writing; Smith did not participate)

Practice Point – Here is the crux of the Court’s holding on the first issue that is worth keeping in mind:

Wagner v. State, 2023-KA-01123-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of felony aggravated domestic violence, holding after a review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record that there were no arguable issues for appeal.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00811-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress the firearm because the stop during which it was obtained did not violate the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without writing)

King v. State, 2023-KA-00658-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder based on counsel’s Lindsey brief and an independent review of the record.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Gardner v. State, 2023-KA-00903-COA consolidated with No. 2018-KA-01337-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing convictions of cocaine possession and felony evasion, holding that the trial court erred in admitting prior convictions for purposes of impeachment but also holding that the defendant is not entitled to a judgment of acquittal because there was sufficient evidence to support his convictions.
(7-2: Carlton dissented, joined by Smith; Emfinger did not participate)

Levi v. State, 2023-KA-00718-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth with intent distribute and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, holding that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of prior convictions for simple possession but that the error was harmless.
(5-4-1: Carlton concurred in part and in result, joined by Smith and Emfinger; Westbrooks and Smith concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Other Orders

  • Collins v. State, 2022-KA-01184-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Wallace v. Smith, 2023-KA-00071-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Siggers v. State, 2023-CP-00324-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Carroll v. State, 2023-CP-00688-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Miller v. State, 2023-CP-00812-COA (granting appellant’s pro se motion for leave to file motion for rehearing out of time)
  • Saddler v. State, 2024-CP-00099-COA (granting motion to reinstate his administratively dismissed appeal)
  • Taylor v. State, 2024-KA-00280-COA (granting motion to reinstate appeal)
  • Morris v. State, 2024-TS-00580-COA (sua sponte order allowing appeal to proceed on the merits)
  • Johnson v. State, 2024-TS-00650-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as timely)
  • Butler v. State, 2024-TS-00747-COA (granting motion to reinstate appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 21, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down five opinions on November 21, 2024, while I was out. Here are summaries of those decisions – two custody/parental rights cases, two felony appeals, and a certified question answer regarding the interplay between the MTCA and the MWPA.

Bell v. State, 2023-KA-00801-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that after consideration of counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record that there were no issues warranting appellate review.
(9-0)

S.D.P. v. Harrison County Department of Child Protection Services, 2023-CA-00838-SCT (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the youth court’s judgment terminating parental rights regarding a medically fragile child, holding that the youth court’s decision was based on clear and convincing evidence that the parents were not mentally, morally, or otherwise fit and that reunification was not desirable toward obtaining a satisfactory permanency outcome.
(9-0)

Johnson v. Miller, 2024-FC-00419-SCT (Civil – Federally Certified Question)
Answering a certified question from the Fifth Circuit, holding that the Mississippi Tort Claims Act’s statute of limitations and notice requirements do not apply to the Mississippi Whistleblower Protection Act.
(9-0)

Myers v. State, 2023-KA-01083-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of shooting into a dwelling and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error regarding jury instructions because the instruction on the elements of shooting into a dwelling did not constitute an impermissible constructive amendment to the indictment.
(9-0)

In Re the Adoption of J.J.W.B: J.B. v. M.M., 2023-IA-00457-SCT, consolidated with 2023-IA-00458-SCT (Civil – Custody)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision denying a motion to dismiss a grandmother’s motion to set aside an adoption because the motion to set aside was untimely and no jurisdictional issues were present to set aside the adoption, but affirming the chancellor’s decision that the adoption did not extinguish the grandmother’s visitation rights and properly denied the motion to dismiss the grandmother’s contempt action and remanding for further proceedings to determine post-adoption visitation.
(5-4-0: Coleman concurred in part and in the result without writing; King concurred in part and in the result, joined by Randolph and Kitchens, and joined in part by Coleman and Griffis)

Other Orders

  • In Re: Rules of Discipline for the Mississippi Bar, 89-R-99010-SCT (appointing or reappointing Alicia S. Hall, Assistant Dean Mary Largent Purvis, District Attorney Angel Myers McIlrath, Municipal Judge Robert Fant Walker, Robert E. Quimby, and Circuit Judge Michelle Easterling to three-year terms)
  • Bell v. State, 2023-KA-008001-SCT (denying second motion for reappointment of counsel and motion for rebuttal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of December 5, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down six opinions today covering personal jurisdiction, waiver of defenses, venue, bad faith, death penalty PRC, and direct criminal appeal. There are also orders amending Rule 10 and Rule 12 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure.

Palmer v. McRae, 2023-CP-01026-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s order enforcing sureties’ liability, holding that the appellant’s arguments on appeal were waived and procedurally barred on appeal because he failed to appear or otherwise defend in the circuit court.
(8-1-0: King concurred in result only without writing)

Mississippi Department of Human Services v. Johnson, 2022-CT-00605-SCT (Civil – Other)
Reversing the chancery court’s and Court of Appeals’ decisions related to a motion to set aside a 2002 paternity order, holding that while the chancery court lacked personal jurisdiction due to insufficient service of process under Rule 81(d), the defendant waived that challenged by stipulating to the validity of the 2002 order in 2003.
(6-3-0: Randolph concurred in part and in result without writing; Griffis concurred in part and in result, joined by Maxwell and joined in part by Randolph)

Boyett v. Cain, 2022-CT-00978-SCT (Civil – Other)
Reversing the circuit court and the Court of Appeals, holding that they erred in finding that the proper venue for a prisoner to challenge an MDOC decision is the county in which the prisoner is located and clarifying that Section 11-11-3 controls and venue is proper in a county in which a defendant resides or in a county where a substantial act or even caused the alleged injury.
(9-0)

United Services Automobile Association v. Estate of Minor, 2023-CA-00049-SCT (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming a jury award of punitive damages in a bad faith claim on direct appeal but reversing the trial court’s denial of a post-trial motion for attorney’s fees, holding (1) that the trial court did not err in submitting the issue of punitive damages to the jury, (2) that the trial court did not err in submitting what he deemed to be a reasonable amount of attorney’s fees (the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ contingency fee), (3) that the $10M punitive damages award was within the Campbell guideline, (4) that trial court did not err in instructing the jury that adjusters were charged with knowledge of all records at all times, in denying the carrier’s request to depose the insured, or in excluding the insured’s bribery convictions, (5) and rendering a judgment awarding attorney’s fees of $4.5M plus post-judgment interest based on a 45% contingency fee on the punitive damages award.
(5-3: Maxwell concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Chamberlin and joined in part by Griffis; Griffis dissented, joined in part by Maxwell; Coleman did not participate)

Corrothers v. State, 2023-CA-00401-SCT (Civil – Death Penalty – Post Conviction)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the petitioner failed to prove improper juror communication.
(7-2-0: Kitchens and King concurred in result only without writing)

Mitchell v. State, 2023-KA-00859-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in instructing the jury and dismissing the ineffective assistance of counsel claims without prejudice.
(8-1-0: Ishee concurred, joined in part by Randolph and Beam)

Other Orders

  • In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (amending Rule 10 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure) (deleting subsection (d) that required a copy of an account or written instrument to be attached to the pleading asserting a claim founded on such)
  • In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (amending Rule 12 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure) (Advisory Committee Historical Notes states that was done to consistently refer to an “answer” to a counterclaim rather than a “reply”)
  • Landrum v. Livingston Holdings, LLC, 2022-CA-00498-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Clemmons v. State, 2022-CT-00700-SCT (denying cert)
  • Brown v. Black, 2022-CT-00869 (denying cert)
  • Boyett v. Cain, 2022-CT-00978-SCT (denying motion for reconsideration)
  • Johnson v. State, 2023-CA-00117-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Wells v. State, 2023-KA-00670-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • In Re: Andrew McGraw, 2024-M-00654 (denying application to proceed in the trial court, finding that the application is frivolous, and restricting the petitioner from filing further PCR applications in forma pauperis)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 3, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. It was a big day for real property and wills. There are also two criminal appeals, an MTCA personal injury case, and a PCR case.

Pham v. Miner, 2023-CA-00266-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision in a dispute over ownership of a parcel, holding that the chancellor erred in finding that a deed was defective and subject to interpretation with parol evidence and further that the chancellor failed to make a specific ruling on the adverse possession claim.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Estate of Forkner: Berry v. Forkner, 2023-CA-00707-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings related to the construction of a holographic will, holding that the chancellor did not err in admitting the will to probate, in finding that real property should pass by intestate succession, or in awarding personal property to one party, but reversing and remanding the issue of attorney’s fees for the chancellor’s failure to apply the McKee factors with supporting findings.
(8-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Lewis v. State, 2023-CP-01109-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary denial of PRC motion, holding that it was time-barred without applicable exception.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Booth v. State, 2023-KA-00906-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding after review of Lindsey brief and the record that there are no arguable issues on appeal.
(10-0)

Lucas v. State, 2023-KA-01015-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of malicious mischief, holding that malicious mischief is not a lesser-included offense of the indicted offense of burglary of a dwelling.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in part and in result without writing)

Smith v. Anderson, 2022-CA-00959-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a dispute among cousins over 159 acres, holding that the chancellor did not err in dismissing a counterclaim of adverse possession or in “failing to address” affirmative defenses that were not pursued, and that an issue not raised in the chancery court was waived on appeal.
(10-0)

Berry v. Jackson County, 2023-CA-00643-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the County in an MTCA suit stemming from a collision with a suspect who was fleeing law enforcement, holding that the plaintiff did not present evidence that the County acted in reckless disregard of her safety.
(5-3-0: Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; Lawrence and Smith did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Hyland v. State, 2023-CA-00256-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Aldridge v. South Tippah County School District, 2023-CA-00418-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Estate of Johnson: Manners v. Estate of Johnson, 2023-CA-00823-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 19, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down two opinions today. Both are direct criminal appeals. I will be out of the office on Thursday, so I’ll include this week’s Mississippi Supreme Court decisions in a post next week.

Smith v. State, 2023-KA-00703-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of of burglary of a dwelling and possession of a weapon as a felon, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence where the jury was presented with two different narratives of the altercation and performed its duty to weight the credibility of the competing evidence.
(10-0)

Ellzey v. State, 2022-KA-00797-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of three counts of fondling, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to quash the indictment, in finding that an alleged statement by a juror regarding the incompetency of a government agency did not constitute impermissible outside influence, in limiting cross-examination of a witness, in not excluding or limiting counseling records under the plain error doctrine, in overruling the defendant’s objection to allegedly speculative testimony, in overruling a hearsay objection because the testimony was not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, in overruling an objection to other allegedly speculative testimony (or committed harmless error), in overruling an objection to testimony that allegedly vouched for the victim’s credibility, or in not sua sponte objecting to statements in closing argument, and dismissing the ineffectively assistance of counsel claim without prejudice, holding that there could be no cumulative error where there was at most one harmless error, and holding that other issues were waived for failure to raise them in the trial court.
(9-1-0: McCarty specially concurred, joined by Westbrooks and McDonald)

Other Orders

  • Martin v. Arceneaux, 2022-CA-01035-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Smith v. Mitchell, 2023-CA-00259-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Carpenter v. State, 2023-KA-00580-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Shipp v. State, 2023-KA-00655-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 14, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down five opinions today. There is an ESLA case, a restrictive covenants case, two direct criminal appeals with reversals, and a significant defamation case.

In Re Validation of up to $27,600,000 Trust Certificates Evidencing Proportional Interests in a Lease by The Simpson County School District: Floyd v. Simpson County School Board, 2023-CA-01126-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision validating of trust certificates for a lease/leaseback transaction to fund construction of a school, holding that nunc pro tunc amendment to the June 10, 2021 minutes was lawful, that the Board’s notice satisfied statutory requirements of the ESLA, that the objecter was afforded adequate due process as required by the ESLA, that the Board had authority to create a nonprofit corporation, and that the ESLA is still applicable.
(8-0: Griffis did not participate.)

Smith v. Brockway, 2023-CA-01027-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancery court’s denial of a petition for injunction and declaratory relief related to restrictive covenants and manufactured housing, holding that the restrictive covenants were unenforceable because they were not signed by the grantor.
(9-0)

Toler v. State, 2023-KA-00712-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after the defendant was convicted of four counts of aggravated assault, one count of shooting into a motor vehicle, four counts of aggravated assault against officers, and failure to stop a motor vehicle for law enforcement, holding (1) that there was sufficient evidence to support the three challenged convictions of aggravated assault against officers who were shot at but not struck, (2) that the indictment was multiplicitous for charging the defendant with for counts of aggravated assault based on firing one shot at four individuals such that merger applied warranting a remand to vacate, merge, and resentence, and (3) that the trial court did not abuse its discretion excluding evidence of the defendant’s peaceful character.
(9-0)

Fagan v. Faulkner, 2022-CT-00130-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the Court of Appeals and reversing the judgments of the circuit court and county court in a defamation case, holding that the circuit court and county court erred by denying the defendant’s motion for directed verdict because as atrocious as the vulgarity was, it was non-actionable “name calling” that did not defame the plaintiff’s professional abilities.
(5-4: Randolph dissented, joined by Kitchens, King, and Ishee)

Ratcliff v. State, 2022-CT-00690-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing the Court of Appeals and the conviction of possession of a stolen firearm, holding that the State failed to present sufficient evidence of the defendant’s guilty knowledge to merit a jury question on that charge.
(8-0: Randolph did not participate)

Other Orders

  • In Re: Advisory Committee on Rules, 89-R-99016-SCT (appointing or reappointing as members of the Advisory Committee on Rules: Hon. Latrice A. Westbrooks, Hon. Carter Bise, Hon. W. Ashley Hines, Hon. Carol Jones Russell, William M. Gage, Esq., Justin T. Cook, Esq., Graham P. Carner, Esq., and Nicholas K. Thompson, Esq.)
  • Estate of Green v. Michini, 2022-CT-00365-SCT (denying cert)
  • Chatman v. State, 2023-KA-00583-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • In Re Validation of up to $27,600,000 Trust Certificates Evidencing Proportional Interests in a Lease by The Simpson County School District: Floyd v. Simpson County School Board, 2023-CA-01126-SCT (granting motion for leave to file a corrected reply brief)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 12, 2024 (and one from November 7)

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions today: one MTCA personal injury case, one direct criminal appeal, and one claim against the parole board. The Court also handed down one opinion on Thursday of last week in a direct criminal appeal.

Alexander v. State, 2023-KA-00331-COA (Criminal – Felony) (Nov. 7, 2024)
Affirming conviction of six counts of exploitation of a child and sentence to forty-years for each court to run consecutively, holding (Part One) that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to sever the six counts of child exploitation; the trial court did not err in denying a generic motion to exclude prior bad acts or in ruling on subsequent objections to testimony of prior bad acts during trial; the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s objections during trial to opening statement comments, to questions during various witness examinations, or to the introduction of a photographs of the defendant and a victims; the trial court did not err in denying a motion for mistrial after a witness mentioned conduct related to one of the severed counts; (Part Two) there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction; the verdicts were not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence; and the sentence was not grossly disproportionate to the crimes.
As to Part One, 8-1: McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Carlton did not participate.
As to Part Two, 6-1-2: Wilson concurred in result only; Emfinger dissented in part, joined by Barnes; Carlton did not participate.

Allred v. Tishomingo County, 2023-CA-00569-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming judgment in favor of the County after an MTCA bench trial in a personal injury action that arose after a limb fell on the roof of the plaintiffs’ vehicle, holding that the County had no statutory duty to inspect or maintain the right-of-way, that the County had no actual or constructive notice that the tree was a dangerous condition, that the County did not proximately cause the damages, that the trial court’s analysis of expert testimony was not mainfestly wrong or clearly erroneous, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion admitting opinions from the County’s expert.
(10-0)

PRACTICE POINT– The County moved to strike the plaintiffs’ reply brief or portions of it on the grounds that it referenced materials that were not designated as part of the record on appeal. The Court denied the motion to strike as moot because it declined to consider the documents that were not in the record on appeal pursuant to M.R.A.P. 10 and 30(a).

Walker v. State, 2023-KA-00860-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of statutory rape, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress the interrogation video where the defendant argued his statement was improperly obtained after he requested counsel because the defendant did not actually invoke his Sixth Amendment right to counsel with regard to the charged offense, holding that the confession was voluntary, and holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-1-0: McCarty concurred in result only without writing)

Siggers v. Mississippi Parole Board, 2023-CP-00900-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of the petitioner’s “show cause motion” seeking the compel the Parole Board to show case as to why his parole was denied and was not set for hearing until 2025, holding that the trial court correctly determined that it lack authority to review the parole board’s decision to deny parole and set off the parole hearing.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

  • Scott v. State, 2022-KA-00830-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Morland v. Morland, 2023-CA-00237-COA (granting appellee’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees)
  • Weeks v. Weeks, 2023-CA-00427-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Walker v. Hasty, 2023-CA-00675-COA (denying motion for appellate attorney’s fees)
  • Corr Properties, LLC v. Proctor, 2023-CA-00782-COA (granting motion for appellate attorney’s fees)
  • Miller v. State, 2023-CP-00812-COA (dismissing motion for rehearing as untimely)
  • Thadison v. State, 2024-TS-00389-COA (granting pro se motion to recall mandate and reinstate appeal)
  • Mallett v. State, 2024-TS-01091-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as appellant’s response to show-cause notice was well taken)
  • Rodgers v. State, 2024-TS-01116-COA (suspending deadline to appeal pursuant to M.R.A.P. 2(c) and allowing appeal to proceed)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 5, 2024 and Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 7, 2024

In what was certainly the biggest new story from Tuesday, the Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions. Today, the Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion and one order amending the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure. You can read about all below.

Mississippi Court of Appeals – November 5, 2024

Patton v. State, 2023-CP-00618-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the motion was successive and untimely with no available exceptions and that the motion was meritless.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Slade v. City of Lumberton, 2023-CA-00830-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a MTCA personal injury case stemming from a police pursuit, holding that the trial court did not err in finding no reckless disregard based on the undisputed facts and that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to recuse based on the judge’s prior representation of the City.
(6-3: McDonald dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty; Weddle did not participate)

McDill v. Scott County School District, 2023-CA-00956-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing summary judgment in an MTCA case stemming from a student’s weightlifting injury at school, holding that the school district was not entitled to discretionary-function immunity.
(10-0)

The University of Mississippi Medical Center v. Redd, 2023-CA-00711-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming a bench trial verdict of $500,000 in a med mal case, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings that the doctor breached the standard of care by not ordering lab work or further testing which, in turn, would have revealed the infection and prevented the amputation, and holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony of an orthopedic surgeon who primarily practiced in a different subspecialty than the treating doctor.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Morgan v. Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi, 2023-CA-00379-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a personal injury case where the plaintiff was struck by poolside cushions blowing in the wind while she was closing out her tab at the swim-up bar, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that they cushions were not an unreasonably dangerous condition and that there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant.
(7-3: Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald and Lawrence)

Other Orders

  • Sinquefield v. The City of Ridgeland, 2022-CA-01276-COA (denying rehearing)
  • In Re Estate of Warren: Warren v. Maharrey, 2023-CA-00438-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court – November 7, 2024

Childress v. State, 2023-KA-01323-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of it.
(9-0)

Other Orders

  • In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (amending M.R.C.P. 62 – the order states that the amendment is effective 30 days after the date of the order which was entered on October 31, 2024)

Here are the amendments to Rule 62 (subsections (c) through (h) were not altered):

  • Mississippi State University v. Zhang, 2024-M-00344-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Hertz Jackson Three, LLC v. Sanders, 2024-M-00497-SCT (denying interloc)
  • Mississippi Baptist Medical Center, Inc. v. Butler, 2024-M-00930-SCT (denying interloc)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 22 and October 29, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions last week and seven this week. You can read summaries of the lot below.

October 22, 2024

Hampton v. State, 2023-KA-00068-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of first-degree murder and using a firearm during the commission of a felony, but vacating the consecutive five-year sentence for using a firearm during the commission of a felony where he was also sentenced to life.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Baur v. Ribelin, 2023-CA-00018-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming on direct and cross appeal in an adverse possession action, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying the claim for adverse possession or in confirming title in the rightful owner.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Johnson v. SW Gaming LLC, 2023-CA-00505-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the circuit court’s decisions granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment in an inadequate security case, holding that the evidence was not sufficient to establish an atmosphere of violence or actual or constructive knowledge that the assailant was a violent person and the evidence was not sufficient to establish garden variety negligence.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

In the Interest of A.R.H., a Minor: Malone v. Jackson County Dept. of Child Protection Services, 2023-CA-00420-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the youth court’s custody order, holding that the youth court was in its discretion to find aggravated circumstances warranting bypassing reasonable efforts for reunification and that there were no evidentiary errors.
(5-4: Wilson and Westbrooks dissented without writing; McDonnald dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty)

October 29, 2024

Banks v. Banks, 2023-CA-00515-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Dismissing appeal for want of an appealable judgment.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Ware v. State, 2023-CP-00909-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary denial of PCR motion, holding that the motion was time-barred and successive.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Morland v. Morland, 2023-CA-00237-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that it was in the child’s best interest to be in the mother’s exclusive custody subject to visitation, in calculation and award of child support to the mother, or in awarding the mother attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Mallard v. State, 2023-CP-01155-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the petitioner could not duck the successive petitions bar by proving any exceptions.
(7-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Sessums v. Chicken Nugget, Inc., 2023-CA-00128-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a premises liability case where the plaintiff tripped over two parking curbs, holding that the plaintiff did not come forward with evidence to prove that two abutting parking curbs created an unreasonably dangerous condition.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Scott v. State, 2023-KA-00559-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of child abuse and conviction of life imprisonment without eligibility for parole for a father who abused his infant child, holding (1) that the admission of the father’s prior conviction for failure to register as a sex offender was not reversible error though it was error to refer to it as “failure to register as a sex offender” instead of “failure to register” which was the actual language in the prior sentencing order, (2) that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, and (3) the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(4-5-0: Wilson and Smith concur in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks, McDonald, and Lawrence concur in result only without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Tisdale v. South Central Regional Medical Center, 2023-CA-00231-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming dismissal for failure prosecute, holding that the trial court did not err in reviewing the motion under Rule 41(b) instead of Rule 37, did not miscalculate the delay and correctly found clear delay with no activity occurring to advance the case to judgment in over two years, and did not abuse its discretion in determining that anything less than a dismissal would be unjust.
(6-3: McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Lawrence dissented, joined by McCarty, and joined in part by McDonald)

NOTE – The dissent argued that the majority discounted the impact of COVID.

Other Orders

October 22, 2024

  • Weatherly v. Weatherly, 2022-CA-00804-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Signaigo v. Grinstead, 2022-CA-01212-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Jackson v. State, 2023-KA-00201-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Neal v. Cain, 2023-CP-00625-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Washington v. State, 2024-CP-00059-COA (granting pro se motion to recall mandate and accept untimely brief)

October 29, 2024

  • Wilson v. State, 2023-CA-00070-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Shanks v. State, 2023-CP-00271-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00636-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Bradley v. State, 2023-CP-0764-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page – October 22, 2024

Hand Down Page – October 29, 2024