Tag: Insurance Coverage

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 23, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eleven opinions yesterday. There are several direct criminal appeal, a couple of wills and estates cases, a personal injury case dismissed for want of prosecution, and an insurance coverage case. There is also a handful of PCR cases including one denial that was reversed and another denial that was vacated because the judge was disqualified.

Brown v. State, 2023-KA-00082-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of three counts of touching a child for lustful purposes and four counts of sexual battery, holding that the trial court did abuse its discretion in excluding the defendant’s mothers testimony that the victim had asked about what the repercussions would be if she lied and holding, that the indictment was legally sufficient, that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, and that there was no plain error affecting the defendant’s substantial rights.
(6-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing.)

Wren v. Zellers, 2023-CA-00152-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for want of prosecution, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion where there was a clear record of delay over the course of four years.
(5-3-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Smith did not participate)

Gibson v. State, 2023-KA-00821-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance, holding that upon review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record that there were no issues that warranted reversal.
(9-0)

Grayson v. State, 2023-KA-00400-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey breif and the record that there were no arguable issues that required supplemental briefing and affirming the trial court.
(9-0)

Bradley v. State, 2023-CP-00763-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the motion as successive.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

In re the Estate of Warren, 2023-CA-00438-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision after bench trial in a will contest and contest over inter vivos transfers, holding that the chancellor did not commit clear error in finding no confidential relationship, finding no evidence of undue influence, and finding that the testator had the requisite mental competence and testamentary capacity when he made the inter vivos transfers and executed his will, and granting a motion to strike an exhibit in the record excerpts that was not included in the lower court record.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Clark v. Alfa Ins. Co., 2022-CA-01251-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of declaratory and summary judgment in favor of an insurer, holding that the agricultural enterprise exclusion in the homeowner’s policy at issue applied to the plaintiffs’ claim against the insured after the plaintiffs’ vehicle collided with the insured’s cattle.
(9-0)

Brown v. State, 2023-CP-00171-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion for PCR seeking to set aside a guilty plea, holding that the motion was time barred.
(9-0)

Norman v. State, 2023-CP-00296-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing denial of PCR motions, holding that the circuit court erred by not considering whether the motion was timely under the UPCCRA and remanding for that purpose.
(5-4: Emfinger dissented, joined by Carlton, Wilson, and Smith)

Price v. State, 2023-CA-00941-COA (Civil – PCR)
Vacating and remanding the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit judge who denied the PCR motion was disqualified because she was the district attorney when the petitioner entered his guilty plea.
(9-0)

In the Matter of the Estate of Staten, 2023-CP-00228-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancery court’s denial of a motion to set aside a prior denial of a prior request to reopen an estate, holding that the appellant had waived her right to appeal issues that had been previously litigated and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion denying motions to set aside/reconsider.
(8-0: Smith did not participate.)

Other Orders

  • Jordan v. State, 2022-CP-00874-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Frazier v. State, 2022-KA-00896-COA (dismissing untimely motion for rehearing)
  • The Avion Group, Inc. v. The City of Oxford, 2023-CA-00169-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Weaver v. State, 2024-TS-00438-COA (dismissing utimely appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of May 30, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down five opinions today. There is an MTCA case, a premises liability case, an unpaid wages case against MDOC, an insurance coverage case, and a workers’ comp/third-party case.

Yazoo City, Mississippi v. Hampton, 2022-IA-01284-SCT (Civil – Property Damage)
Reversing denial of summary judgment in a case seeking to hold the City liable for alleged ineffective firefighting and alleged resulting cardiac stress, holding that the City was immune under the MTCA from both property damage and personal injury liability where the evidence did not support a finding of reckless disregard by the fire department.
(9-0)

St. Dominic-Jackson Memorial Hospital v. Martin, 2023-CA-00285-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing judgment on a jury verdict in case stemming from a fall in an emergency room parking lot, holding that the evidence did not require judgment in the defendant’s favor but that the trial court erred by granting a negligence per se instruction and remanded for a new trial.
(9-0)

Mississippi Department of Corrections v. McClure, 2022-IA-01201-SCT (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over a former probation officer’s claim for unpaid wages for work with the MDOC, holding that Mississippi courts have jurisdiction to hear state employees’ claims against their employers for breach of contract and that the exhaustion doctrine did not apply because there was not adequate administrative remedy.
(9-0)

VT Halter Marine, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters of Lloyd’s of London Subscribing to Policy Number B0507M17PH04660, 2023-CA-00019-SCT (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of an insurer in a suit by an insured seeking coverage for costs incurred in repairing and replacing flange plates that failed due to faulty workmanship, holding the insurance policy unambiguously excluded the cost of replacing or repairing improper or defective materials.
(9-0)

Brent v. Mississippi Dept. of Human Services, 2022-CT-00529-SCT (Civil – Workers’ Compensation)
Reversing the decision of the Mississippi Court of Appeals that affirmed trial court’s decision allowing the intervening employer/carrier’s EME costs be included in the statutory lien, holding that the EME was not a “reasonable and necessary medical expense” and therefore not properly included in the lien amount.
(9-0)

Other Orders

  • DeJohnette v. State, 2022-CA-00249-SCT (denying cert)
  • Chambliss v. Chambliss, 2023-CT-00087-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of June 29, 2023 (catch-up post)

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions on June 29. The first was an estate case addressing claims of undue influence. The other was a personal injury case on interlocutory appeal of the denial of an insurer’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether an employer’s CGL policy provided coverage for an employee’s motor vehicle accident using company equipment.

Estate of Biddle v. Biddle, 2021-CP-00513-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decisions in an estate matter, holding that venue and jurisdiction were waived by the testator’s sons because those issues were raised for the first time in response to their stepmother’s motion for summary judgment and that the evidence did not create a genuine issue of material fact concerning the existence of “suspicious circumstances” rising to the level of undue influence of the wife over her husband.
(9-0)

Penn-Star Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 2022-IA-00106-SCT (Civil- Personal Injury)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of an insurer’s motion for summary judgment in a motor vehicle negligence action, holding that there was no coverage under the company’s CGL policy where an employee of a welding company was involved in a collision while operating a forklift owned by the company to tow his personal truck to the company’s premises to self-perform repairs because the collision did not “arise out of or relate to” the welding operations.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Watts v. Watts, 2021-CT-00321-SCT (denying cert)

$41,000 v. State, 2021-CT-00692-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down List

Summaries of the Mississippi Supreme Court opinions of April 7, 2022

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down five opinions today. I think Weber v. Estate of Hill will be a frequently cited case on the issue of medical expert causation testimony, especially in the medical malpractice context. There is also an insurance coverage decision (where the court granted interlocutory appeal and then affirmed the circuit court), another medical malpractice case dealing with a hospital’s lack of liability for treatment plans of independent physicians, a contempt of youth court case, and a Mississippi Bar disciplinary decision.

Donaldson v. Cotton, 2020–CA-00581-SCT (Civil – Other/Contempt)
Vacating the a youth court judge’s order of contempt against a county prosecutor fining him for past and continuing refusal to draft youth court orders, holding that youth court judges have inherent authority to order a county prosecutor to prepare orders in youth court matters but that the alleged contempt was constructive criminal contempt and thus the attorney’s due process rights were violated. The order was vacated, the case was remanded, and the youth court judge was direct to recuse for further proceedings.
(Justice Coleman dissented, joined by Chief Justice Randolph and Justice Beam.)

Weber v. Estate of Hill, 2020-CA-00293-SCT (Civil – Medical Malpractice/Causation/Experts)
Denying rehearing and and modifying two paragraphs (¶ 37 and ¶ 38) of the original opinion. On direct appeal, the supreme court affirmed the circuit court’s denial of the defendants’ motion for JNOV that argued there was no admissible expert testimony on causation, holding that the testimony of one of the plaintiff’s medical experts provided a basis for a juror to reasonably conclude that a timely C-section delivery would have provided the baby with a greater-than-50-percent chance of a substantially better outcome even though that expert testified that he lacked the expertise necessary to quantify the degree to which the labor and delivery process aggravated the injury. On cross appeal, the supreme court reversed the circuit court’s reduction of the jury’s $2,538,322 award for non-economic damages, holding that this action filed in December 2002 was governed by Mississippi’s wrongful-death statute because the medical-malpractice noneconomic-damages cap was not in place until September 1, 2004.
(Justice Griffis dissented, joined by Justice Coleman and Justice Maxwell. Chief Justice Randolph did not participate.)

NOTE: This was a big win for the plaintiff and it is a must-read case on medical expert causation testimony, especially in the medical malpractice context. I have not read the record, but my understanding from the majority opinion and the dissent is that no expert specifically testified that a timely C-section delivery would have provided the baby with a greater-than-50-percent chance of a substantially better outcome. Instead, the supreme court allowed the jury to “connect the dots” (the “dots” being other pieces of expert testimony) in determining that the plaintiff satisfied that causation standard even though the plaintiff’s obstetrics and maternal-fetal medicine expert testified he was not qualified to connect these dots and give an opinion as to the percentage aggravation would be.

Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. Powell, 2020-IA-00432-SCT (Civil – Insurance/Coverage)
On interlocutory appeal, affirming the circuit court’s denial of the insurance company’s motion for summary judgment seeking a declaratory judgment that it had no duty to provide coverage, no duty to defend/indemnify, and no duty to pay medpay benefits, holding that a fall from scaffolding that was erected on a trailer that was hitched to an insured pickup was an auto accident arising out of the use and ownership of the covered vehicles.
(Justice Maxwell concurred in result only, joined by Justice Chamberlain and Justice Griffis, and joined by Justice Coleman in part.)

St. Dominic-Jackson Memorial Hospital v. Newton, 2020-IA-00494-SCT (Civil – Medical Malpractice)
On interlocutory appeal, reversing the circuit court’s denial of the hospital’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the Mississippi law does not impose a duty on a hospital to require peer review of a treatment plan before allowing a doctor and patient to use its facilities.
(Justice Kitchens dissented, joined by Justice King.)

PRACTICE POINT: This is less-than-ideal feedback to receive from the supreme court…

Other Orders

Howell v. State, 2020-CA-00868-SCT (directing the parties to file supplemental briefs on the following issue: Whether the Court should overrule Rowland v. State, 42 So. 3d 503 (Miss. 2010), and any other case in which, and to the extent that, we have held the fundamental rights exception to the procedural bars may be applied to the three-year statute of limitations codified by the Legislature in the Uniform Post-Conviction Collateral Relief Act)

Bryant v. Bryant, 2020-CT-00883-SCT (granting cert)

Newell v. State, 2020-CT-01137-SCT (denying cert)

Thornhill v. Walker-Hill Environmental, 2020-CT-01181-SCT (granting cert)

The Mississippi Bar v. Malone, 2021-BD-00467-SCT (suspending attorney Robert W. Malone for two years)

Hand Down List

Summaries of the Mississippi Supreme Court’s opinions of March 31, 2022

The mix of beautiful spring weather and apocalyptic tornado warnings this week set the stage for just one opinion from the Mississippi Supreme Court to compliment the one opinion handed down by the Mississippi Court of Appeals on Tuesday. The case today is an insurance coverage dispute that analyzes several provisions of an excess policy and determines that summary judgment finding of no coverage under a pollution exclusion was in error.

Omega Protein, Inc. v. Evanston Insurance Company, 2020-CA-01097-SCT (Civil – Insurance/Insurance Coverage/Excess Insurance)
The Supreme Court reversed the circuit court’s grant of the excess carrier’s motion for summary judgment in a dec action where the excess carrier sought a declaration of no coverage for injuries and a death sustained in a plant explosion that occurred while a contractor was performing welding work at the plant. The Supreme Court held that (1) a pollution exclusion did not apply as a matter of law because it was ambiguous and susceptible to more than one interpretation and must be construed in favor of coverage, (2) coverage under the excess policy was not triggered by the primary insurer paying out limits because there had been no adjudication of fault or negligence of the named-insured contractor, and (3) the issue of the plant’s status as an additional insured under the insured contractor’s excess policy could not be determined because there had been no adjudication of fault or negligence of the named-insured contractor.
(All justices concurred)

Other Orders

Dooley v. Dooley, 2020-CA-01061-SCT (dismissing appeals filed by appellant and appellees for want of jurisdiction)
Omega Protein, Inc. v. Evanston Insurance Company, 2020-CA-01097-SCT (denying motion for rehearing, withdrawing original opinion, and substituting the opinion above)

Hand Down List