Tag: Mississippi Court of Appeals

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 16, 2025

As the year draws the a close, the Mississippi Court of Appeals is finishing strong with seven opinions handed down today. There were three domestic relations cases, two felony appeals, one misdemeanor appeal, and an undue influence case.

Rasbeery v. State, 2024-KA-01005-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth with a firearm enhancement, holding that the conviction of constructive possession was supported by sufficient evidence, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that the trial court did not err in denying a motion suppress the defendant’s roadside statements.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Lucas v. Estate of Lucas, 2024-CA-01259-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision invalidating a gift and setting aside a deed, holding that the grantee did not provide sufficient evidence overcome the presumption of undue influence.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

J.T.S. v. M.L.S., 2024-CA-00023-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part a chancellor’s decision in a divorce case, holding that the Court had appellate jurisdiction, that the chancery court did not in dismissing several counts of the amended complaint, that the chancellor did err in modifying the life insurance provision of the divorce agreement, that the chancellor did not err in enforcing a provision limiting reimbursement of medical expenses, that the chancellor did not err in assessing post-judgment interest, that the chancellor did not err in finding that one party had no obligation to contribute to condo or allowance expenses, that the chancery court did not abuse its discretion in crediting payments as child support, that the chancellor did err in awarding attorney’s fees without specific findings, and that there was no merit to the claim that the chancellor was impartial.
(7-1-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence and St. Pe’ did not participate)

Turner v. State, 2024-KM-01020-COA, consolidated with 2024-KM-01028-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Affirming convictions of speeding and careless driving on appeal from justice court, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction which was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and that the trial court did not impermissibly place the burden of proof on the defendant.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Odom v. State, 2023-KA-01165-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and armed robbery, holding that the jury was not so improperly instructed on self-defense as to warrant reversal and that the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction.
(9-1-0: Wilson for the Court; Barnes concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Bradshaw v. Bradshaw, 2024-CA-00882-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment of contempt, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding the ex-husband in willful contempt for failing to pay court-ordered alimony or in reducing his monthly periodic alimony payment.
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Thornton v. Thornton, 2024-CA-00320-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s judgment in a divorce case, holding that the chancery court did not abuse its discretion awarding joint legal and physical custody, that the chancellor did not err in distribution of marital property or in personal property.
(7-1-2: Barnes for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Carlton concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McCarty)

Other Orders

  • Parra v. Rapid-American Corporation, 2023-CA-01196-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Buck v. State, 2024-KA-00025-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Tauzin v. Tauzin, 2024-CA-00141-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 9, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions yesterday. Three are appeals of felony convictions and the others are an heirship case, a worker’s comp case, and a reversal in a PCR case.

Oats v. State, 2024-KA-00278-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for mistrial after the jury declared itself hung and that the issue was doubly procedurally-barred and that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of it.
(7-3: Lawrence for the Court; McDonald dissented without writing; Westbrook dissented, joined by McDonald and Lassitter St. Pe’)

Chamblee v. State, 2024-KA-00556-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of gratification of lust, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for change of venue, in denying a motion for mistrial, in excluding false-accusation evidence, or in excluding sexually explicit photographs, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Physicians’ Pain and Spin Specialists, PLLC v. Kluczkowski, 2025-WC-00069-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s finding that the employer was subject to the MWCA and that the claimant sustained a compensable injury, holding that there was substantial evidence that the employer regularly employed at least five employees and that the claimant presented substantial evidence of a compensable injury.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

O’Callaghan v. State, 2024-KA-00415-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of possession of a controlled substance, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding holding trial in absentia or in denying the defendant’s motion for mistrial based on a juror’s remark.
(7-3-0: Carlton for the Court; Westbrooks and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Estate of Dorsey v. Matory, 2024-CA-00925-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancery court’s judgment in an heirship dispute, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that a prior adoption petition and proceeding constituted an adjudication of paternity of and legitimacy, that the adopted child was an heir-at-law of his biological father entitled to a share of his estate, or that equity favored not applying the one-year statute of limitations.
(8-2-0: Barnes for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald and McCarty)

Shelton v. State, 2024-CA-00435-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the denial of a PCR petition, holding that the circuit court clearly erred in holding that a revised State’s expert opinion does not merit reversal and that arguments regarding ineffective assistance and factual innocence are moot since the case was remanded for new trial.
(7-3: Barnes for the Court; Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Lawrence and Weddle)

Other Orders

  • Moyer v. Blades, 2023-CA-01180-COA (denying rehearing)
  • James v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport, 2024-CA-00459 (denying rehearing)
  • Snyder v. Pilger, 2024-CA_00460-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Carroll v. State, 2024-KA-00481-COA (recalling mandate and granting pro se motion for additional time to file motion for rehearing)
  • Cole v. Fish, 2024-CA-00508-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Corr Properties, LLC v. City of Oxford, 2024-CC-00665-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Graves v. State, 2024-KA-00691-COA (recalling mandate and granting pro se motion to file motion for rehearing otu of time)
  • Haddad v. State, 2025-TS-01229-COA (dismissing application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and granting time for the pro se appellat to file the motion in circuit court)
  • Reid v. State, 2025-TS-01261-COA (suspending deadling to file appeal to allow appeal to proceed on its merits)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 2, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions on Tuesday. Four are criminal appeals. The three civil cases involve child visitation modification, a 12(b)(6) motion, and a motion to compel arbitration.

Holifield v. State, 2023-KA-01320-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction, that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and also declining to address the ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claim on direct appeal.
(8-2-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing’ Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing)

Rodgers v. State, 2024-KA-01116-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that there was sufficient evidence that he possessed a firearm on the date alleged in the indictment.
(9-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)

Cosby v. State, 2024-KA-00518-COA, consolidated with Cosby v. State, 2024-KA-00522-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming two defendants’ convictions of sexual battery of a minor, holding that the trial court did not err by denying their motion for directed verdict or in denying their JNOV, that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction, that the trial court did not err in failing to conduct a pretrial hearing on a tender-years issue, that the trial court did not err in limiting cross-examination of witnesses, and that the plaintiff’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim lacked merit.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Kirkland v. Kirkland, 2024-CA-00801-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s ruling on a visitation modification petition, holding that the chancellor did not abuse her discretion, commit clear error, or manifest error in denying the mother’s petition to modify visitation or in granting the father’s counterclaim for additional visitation.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Martin v. Smith, 2024-CA-01027-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the trial court’s decision granting the defendant’s 12(b)(6) motion, holding that the plaintiff failed to sufficiently state claims for defamation, slander, malicious interference with employment, or intentional infliction of emotional distress under Mississippi’s pleading standard.
(7-2-1: Weddle for the Court; Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Barnes dissented without writing)

Jenkins v. Ford Motor Company, 2024-CA-00994-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the trial court’s decision granting a motion to compel arbitration, holding that although the defendant asserted arbitration in its answer waiting nearly one year before filing a motion to compel arbitration while engaging in the litigation process constituted failure to pursue it.
(6-4: Lawrence for the Court; Emfinger dissented, joined by Barnes, Wilson, and Lassitter St. Pe’)

Practice Point – Arbitration agreements have made a strong showing on here lately. Beware of recycled briefing on arbitration-related issues.

Butler v. State, 2024-KA-00821-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s imperfect self-defense instruction where the trial court also granted the defendant’s self-defense instruction.
(10-0: Westbrooks for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Green v. Presbyterian Day School, 2023-CA-01278-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Luster v. State, 2024-CA-00014-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Brownlee v. State, 2024-CA-00585-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Teel v. Boyd Biloxi, LLC, 2024-CP-00810-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 25, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals served a seasonally-appropriate portion of twelve opinions on Tuesday with nine other orders on the side. You can read about the lot below.

Cummings v. State, 2024-KA-00909-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of first-degree murder, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in the jury instructions given, the trial court did did not abuse its discretion in allowing evidence of other bad acts, the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim was without merit, and that the cumulative error doctrine did not apply.
(7-3: Weddle for the Court; Wilson dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McDonald)

In the Interest of K.B.: A.B.B. v. E.B.S., 2024-CA-00313-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the youth court’s decision terminating parental rights, holding that the natural mother exercised all of the rights that she complained on appeal that the trial court failed to give her including her right to court-appointed counsel.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Bivins v. Ellisville State School, 2024-SA-01098-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision affirming the Mississippi Employee Appeals Board’s decision affirming an employee’s termination, holding that the former employee failed to show that the order was not supported by substantial evidence or was arbitrary and capricious.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Dortch v. State, 2024-KA-01102-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder while engaged in the commission of a robbery after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and independently reviewing the record.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Latham v. State, 2024-KA-00719-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and independently reviewing the record.
(10-0: Lawrence for the Court)

Day v. Day, 2024-CA-00771-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s custody modification order, holding that there was evidence to support the chancellor’s finding of a material change in circumstances and awarding the mother custody and visitation rights for the father.
(9-0: Lawrence for the Court; Weddle did not participate)

Higdon v. Pinkston, 2023-CP-00685-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s grant of summary judgment in a property-line dispute, holding that the chancellor’s decision where the motion for summary judgment was not opposed by a response or evidence at the hearing.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

McLaurin v. State, 2024-KA-00138-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth but reversing sentence as a nonviolent habitual offender, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that there was no plain error in admission of hearsay testimony from an officer, that the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim lacked merit, that the trial court properly excluded proposed hearsay testimony, that the trial court did not err in qualifying the jury venire in the defendant’s absence, that the spousal privilege did not apply to certain testimony, and that matters not raised in the trial court were procedurally barred, but holding that the trial court erred in finding that it lacked sentencing discretion.
(6-4-0: Carlton for the Court; Wilson, McDonald, Emfinger, and Weddle concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Bodie v. State, 2024-KA-00634-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of sexual battery and one count of touching a child for lustful purposes, holding that the defendant’s rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause were not violated.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

CNRS&Z Inc. v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, 2024-CA-00365-COA (Civil – Contracts)
Affirming the trial court’s decision granting a motion to compel arbitration, holding that the trial court did not err in finding a valid and binding arbitration agreement with one of the defendants and that the “close legal relationship” between that defendant and two others allowed them to enforce the arbitration agreement as well.
(5-5: Barnes for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks, McDonald, Lawrence, and Lassitter St. Pe’)

Note – The dissent agreed that the claims against the defendant who signed the arbitration agreement were bound to arbitration, but took issue with binding the claims against the other two defendants:

Estate of Price v. St. Dominic-Jackson Memorial Hospital, 2024-CA-00582-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of a med mal action finding that it was barred by the statute of limitations and that it was an impermissible duplicative action, holding that the plaintiff waived any challenge to the dismissal as an impermissible duplicative action by failing to address it on appeal and that it was therefore unnecessary for the Court to address the statute of limitations issue.
(6-2-0: Wilson for the Court; McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Lassitter St. Pe’ specially concurred, joined by Westbrooks; Barnes and Weddle did not participate.)

Avery v. State, 2024-CP-01044-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing summary dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the motion was sufficient to survive summary dismissal and required the State to answer to motion and provide an explanation for its calculate of the parole eligibility date.
(8-2: Wilson for the Court; Lawrence dissented, joined by Weddle)

Other Orders

  • In the Interest of J.S.: P.S. v. Pearl River County Dept. of CPS, 2023-CA-00932-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Swims v. State, 2023-KA-01244-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Jackson v. State, 2023-KA-01280-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Hinds v. PERS, 2023-SA-01400-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Patterson v. State, 2024-KA-00268-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Brown v. State, 2024-CA-00307-COA (denying hearing)
  • Varnado v. State, 2024-KA-00338-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Polk v. State, 2024-KA-00591-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Wright v. State, 2025-TS-00986-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 4, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down ten opinions yesterday. The Court covered a lot of ground including wills,the MTCA, felony convictions, an arbitration award, and arbitration agreement enforceability.

Pittman v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., 2024-CA-00619-COA (Civil – Torts)
Reversing the circuit court’s grant of a motion to compel arbitration, holding that the circuit court erred in finding that the plaintiff was a third-party beneficiary of an arbitration agreement.
(9-1: Weddle for the Court; Wilson dissented)

Ward v. State, 2024-KA-00341-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after a judgment of convictions of voyeurism and first-degree murder, holding that trial counsel was not ineffective for not requesting a severance or for failing to object to the State’s peremptory strikes and that the evidence was sufficient to support each of the convictions, but holding that the circuit court erred in refusing a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction.
(7-3: Emfinger for the Court; Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Lawrence concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Carlton and Westbrooks, joined in part by Wilson)

Roberts v. State, 2024-CA-00988-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that because only one petition for revocation of Roberts’s PRS had been filed, the circuit court did not have the authority to impose her full sentence under section 47-7-37.
(6-4*-1: McDonald for the Court; Emfinger specially concurred, joined by Barnes, Weddle, and Lassitter St. Pe’, joined in part by Lawrence and McCarty; Wilson concurred in result only without writing; Lawrence dissented, joined in part by Emfinger and Weddle)

Fields v. State, 2024-KA-01204-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of twenty-five counts of child exploitation, holding searches of the defendants laptops in Harrison County pursuant to a George County warrant were proper, and holding that the defendant cannot complain on appeal about the absence of a jury instruction his counsel strategically withdrew.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Williams v. State, 2024-KA-00257-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that any error in limiting evidence related to the victim’s character did not warrant reversal in light of other evidence of guilt.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks for the Court; Wilson and Emfinger concur in result only without writing)

Jones v. Madison County Nursing Home, 2024-CA-00561-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the dismissal of a suit against a nursing home, holding that it was time-barred because it was filed outside of the MTCA’s one-year statute of limitations, holding that the County was not estopped from asserting the statute of limitations defense after the Board of Supervisors had responded to a pre-suit notice letter stating that the county was not a proper party.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Chavers v. State, 2024-KA-00551-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of manslaughter and one count of aggravated assault after driving a UTV into a group of people leaving a party, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in giving a voluntary intoxication instruction, that the circuit court’s error in giving the jury the wrong set of jury instructions that error was harmless because it was corrected during deliberations, and that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence.
(9-0: Wilson for the Court; Lawrence did not participate)

Estate of Fleishhacker: Ward v. Edwards, 2024-CA-00418-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision denying in a will contest, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying a request to probate a lost holographic will and finding an earlier will valid.
(7-2-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Practice Point – Though it did not affect the holding in the case, the Court held that the trial court erred in finding that one witness’s testimony was insufficient under section 91-7-10 because she was the primary beneficiary under the purported will. But the Court of Appeals noted that neither the chancellor nor the parties accounted for the repeal of the Dead Man’s Statute.

Gillespie Funeral Home, LLC v. Magnolia Guaranty Life Insurance Company, 2024-CA-00427-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision after an arbitration award, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying a motion to set aside an arbitration award or in entering a final judgment confirming the award.
(9-1-0: Barnes for the Court; McDonald concurred in the result only without writing)

Sanford v. State, 2024-KA-00683-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming a conviction of gratification of lust, statutory rape, and sexual battery, holding that the argument that the circuit judge should have recused himself after he was contacted by the victim’s father prior to trial was waived and without merit where the judge said he explained to the father that the could not talk about matters that could come before the court.
(9-1-0: Barnes for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Younger v. Southern, 2022-CA-01228-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Mangum v. State, 2023-KA-01198-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Morsi v. JB Hunt Corp., 2024-WC-00399-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 7, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions of substance yesterday. There is a divorce case, a timber case, a felony, a visitation/in loco parentis case, an heirship case, and a UM/UIM case with an interesting procedural question.

Hodge v. Hodge, 2024-CA-00745-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision granting the ex-wife’s petition to set aside a final divorce degree arguing that she was forced to sign it under duress, holding that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in finding the Rule 60(b)(4) motion timely, that section 93-5-2(5) did not apply because the complaint was not contested, that the chancellor erred by determining that the final divorce decree should be set aside in part because of the ex-husband’s claim splitting, and that there was not clear and convincing evidence that the ex-husband committed fraud.
(9-0: Lawrence for the Court; Barnes did not participate)

Payne Logging, LLC v. Smith, 2024-CA-00439-COA (Civil – Property Damage)
Affirming the chancellor’s award of monetary damages in a landowner’s claim against a logging company that removed timber off their property without permission while logging a neighbor’s property, holding that the chancery court did not err in applying the statutory guidelines in section 95-5-10.
(10-0: Westbrooks for the Court)

Hall v. State, 2024-KA-00364-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted capital murder, holding the the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and that it was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Edwards v. Johnson, 2023-CA-01271-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision denying a petition to establish visitation by a non-parent, holding that the chancellor erred in applying the doctrine of unclean hands before determining the petitioner’s in loco parentis status and, if necessary, reaching the issue of whether visitation was in the child’s best interest.
(6-3: Carlton for the Court; Weddle concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Wilson dissented; Emfinger dissented, joined in part by Wilson and Weddle; Lawrence did not participate)

In the Matter of Estate of Lewis: Curry v. Thomas, 2024-CA-00346-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision establishing paternity, holding that the one-year limitation for paternity is self-executing and thus cannot be waived and that the petitioner was barred from asserting an heirship claim because she did not attempt to establish paternity until almost eighteen years after her putative father’s death.
(7-3*: Barnes for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald, McCarty, and Lassitter St Pe’)

Thompson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, 2024-CA-00393-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict in favor of a UM carrier, holding that the trial court did not err in granting a directed verdict for the UM carrier because there was no proof that the tortfeasor was an uninsured motorist and UM/UIM status was a question for the jury, that the UM carrier did not waive the argument that UM coverage was not applicable because the carrier did not have a duty to prove that the tortfeastor was an uninsured motorist, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a new trial.
(7-3: Barnes for the Court; McDonald dissented without writing; McCarty dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McDonald)

Practice Point – McCarty’s dissent took issue with the directed verdict being granted during the damages phase of trial in front of the jury:

Other Orders

  • Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00884-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Quinn v. State, 2023-KA-01143-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 30, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions yesterday. We closed out the month with a med mal/MTCA decision, a workers’ comp borrowed employee case, a felony conviction, a PCR case, and an MDOC administrative remedy case.

University of Mississippi Medical Center v. Giddens, 2024-CA-00842-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a wrongful death med mal case brought under the MTCA, holding that the trial court’s decision that the decedent had not given informed consent for a procedure that constituted a breach of the standard of care and that the decision to perform that procedure during another procedure was a breach of the standard of care was supported by substantial credible evidence.
(10-0: St. Pe’ for the Court)

Walker v. State, 2024-CP-01032-COA (Civil – PCR)
Vacating and rendering judgment dismissing a PCR petition because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider the merits where the petition failed to first obtain permission from the Mississippi Supreme Court.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Adams v. Hinds County School District, 2024-CA-00756-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision granting summary judgment in a personal injury case, holding that the trial court did not err in determining that the plaintiff (an employee of a staffing service) was a borrowed employee of the school district and that workers’ compensation was therefore her exclusive remedy.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Walton v. State, 2024-KA-00818-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of felony possession of stolen property, holding that the evidence was sufficient, that the trial could did not err in denying the motion for directed verdict or in refusing a peremptory instruction asserting that the State failed to prove the element of guilty knowledge, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Carroll v. State, 2024-CP-00875-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of the petition for clarification of a sentencing order, holding that the circuit court reached the right result but for the wrong reason and explaining that the petition was untimely.
(7-3-0: Wilson, Westbrooks, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

  • Shipley v. Shipley, 2023-CA-00814-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Stephney v. State, 2023-KA-00936-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Mortera v. Kona Villa Owners Association, Inc., 2023-CA-01297-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 23, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. There is a reversal of a defense verdict in a med mal case and a reversal of a conviction. There are a couple of domestic relations cases and another criminal appeal.

Upchurch v. Lewis, 2023-CA-01296-COA, consolidated with Lewis v. Upchurch, 2024-CA-00396-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Reversing the circuit court’s denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for JNOV in a med mal case after a defense verdict, holding that the plaintiffs presented substantial testimony that the defendant-physician breached the standard of care and that his negligence caused the plaintiff’s injuries, and that since the defendant-physician was not tendered or accepted as an expert there was no insufficient evidence to support the verdict in favor of the defendant; affirming the trial court’s decision requiring the appellee to pay the $30,000 for the appellee’s additional record designations.
(6-3: Weddle for the Court; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes; Emfinger did not participate)

Sharp v. Sharp, 2024-CA-00171-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s order clarifying its final judgment of divorce, holding that the chancellor had authority to clarify and correct the final judgment and did not abuse his discretion in doing so regarding 529 accounts or requiring the father to pay college education expenses.
(9-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Clark v. State, 2024-KA-00932-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of one court of sexual battery, holding that the State’s improper reference to nonexistent DNA and repeated comments on evidence excluded by pretrial order amounted to denial of the defendant’s due process.
(8-2-0: McCarty for the Court; McDonald and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Thornhill v. Thornhill, 2023-CA-00714-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s grant of divorce on the ground of desertion, holding that there there was substantial credible evidence supporting the basis for divorce, that the chancellor did not err in property evaluation or equitable division, or in granting rehabilitative alimony instead of periodic alimony.
(10-0: Lawrence for the Court)

Practice Point – This is excerpt is worth noting. Failure to raise an issue in a Rule 59 motion does not bar that issue on appeal as long as it was presented to and decided by the trial court:

Alexander v. Scarbrough, 2023-CA-01359-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s award of full custody to a child’s mother, holding that there was substantial evidence to supporting the chancellor’s legal determinations and fact findings.
(10-0: Lawrence for the Court)

Harrison v. State, 2024-KA-00430-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of sexual battery, holding that the defendant’s argument that the date range in his indictment was not overly broad was procedurally barred and without merit.
(9-1-0: Carlton for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

  • Magyar v. Shiers, 2023-CA-00682-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Brownless v. Brownless, 2023-CA-01044-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Ruffin v. State, 2024-CA-00867-COA (denying State’s motion to strike untimely motion for rehearing)
  • Walker v. State, 2025-TS-00584-COA (sua sponte allowing untimely appeal to proceed)
  • Robertson v. State, 2025-TS-00806-COA (sua sponte allowing untimely appeal to proceed)
  • Hoskins v. State, 2025-TS-00993-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as timely after taking pro se response to show cause notice well)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 16, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. We got a couple of custody decisions, a couple of MTCA decisions, a failure to prosecute a med mal lawsuit, a felony, and a PCR case.

E.H. v. Lee County Dept. of Child Protective Services, 2023-CA-00732-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the youth court’s decision terminating parental rights, holding that the youth court’s decision was supported by substantial evidence and that the denial of a Rule 60 motion was not erroneous.
(10-0: St. Pe’ for the Court)

Cameron v. Miller, 2023-CA-01388-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision granting a motion to dismiss a med mal lawsuit for failure to prosecute, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion where the record demonstrated an overall case of dilatory conduct, substantial periods of inactivity, and untimely and reactionary steps.
(7-2-1: Weddle for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Russell v. Booneville Police Dept., 2024-CP-00757-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the dismissal of a lawsuit under the MTCA, holding that the circuit court did not err in dismissing the claim for law of presuit notice.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Saddler v. State, 2024-CP-00099-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of a PCR motion because the trial court did not err in finding it was time-barred.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Hall v. Mitchell, 2024-CA-00667-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming the circuit court’s judgment for the defendant after bench trial, holding that the trial court’s decision that a parked county-owed truck was not the proximate cause of an collision between the decedent’s motorcycle and an SUV.
(8-2-0: McCarty for the Court; Wilson, Westbrooks, and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Cunningham v. State, 2023-KA-01213-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing the defendant’s jury instructions on self-defense, imperfect self-defense, and culpable-negligence manslaughter; that the trial court’s did not err in denying a pretrial motion and refusing proposed jury instructions regarding lost body-camera footage; that the trial court erred harmlessly in admitting the victim’s statement to EMTs; that the trial court did not “improperly console” the victim’s mother in the courtroom by expressing sympathy while admonishing her to keep her composure; that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the overwhelming weight of it; and that the cumulative error doctrine did not apply.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Hopkins v. Perry, 2024-CA-00467-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s custody order, holding that the chancellor did not err in modifying visitation modification but remanding for an Albright analysis of the legal custody issue.
(9-0: Carlton for the Court; Westbrooks did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Horne v. Dolgencorp LLC, 2024-CA-00376-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2024-CA-00455-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 9, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions on Tuesday. I finally got around to summarizing them and you can read those summaries below.

Lovelace v. Board of Trustees of East Mississippi Community College, 2023-CA-01341-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the chancellor’s order denying appeal and upholding the board’s decision not to renew an instructor’s contract, holding that the chancellor did not err by not considering documents that were not before the board, that the board’s decision was supported by substantial evidence, and the instructor was not denied due process.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Ingram v. Ingram, 2023-CA-01364-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the Court’s custody order, holding that the chancellor did not err in the Albright analysis or abuse his discretion in the visitation award.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Franklin v. State, 2024-CP-00696-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion as time-barred.
(9-0: McCarty for the Court; Emfinger did not participate)

Cardwell v. State, 2024-CP-01088-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion as successive.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Brookshire v. State, 2023-KA-00966-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that there was a custodial interrogation that violated the right to counsel that had been invoked but that the error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence supporting the conviction and that its admission did not result in plain error under the Confrontation Clause.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks for the Court; Carlton and McCarty concurred in result only without writing)

Williams v. State, 2024-CA-00817-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing summary dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the petitioner was not required to seek leave from the Supreme Court before filing the PCR motion.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Back Bay Lawnscapes LLC v. Graham, 2024-CA-00054-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s order granting summary judgment upholding a sales tax assessment and an individual income tax assessment, holding that the taxpayer failed to fulfill its statutory duty to keep adequate records and that the chancellor did not err in applying the law to the facts of the case or in awarding damages.
(9-0: Carlton for the Court; Westbrooks did not participate)

Taylor v. Fair, 2024-CP-00676-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s dismissal of a petition for write of habeas corpus and emergency custody of the petitioner’s child, holding that the chancellor did not err in dismissing the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
(9-1-0: Carlton for the Court; McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Estate of Anderson: Brown v. Fitzgerald, 2023-CA-01131-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Smith v. State, 2024-KA-00162-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Bickes v. Swain, 2024-CA-00187-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Roach v. Roach, 2024-CA-00236-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page