Tag: Mississippi Court of Appeals

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 21, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions on Tuesday. It was an eclectic mix, including a workers’ comp case, a dysfunctional two-member LLC , a wrongful death case against a sheriff’s deputy, and an inmate’s request for removal of a rule violation report.

Holloway v. King, 2021-CP-01351-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision that affirmed the denial of an inmate’s request for the removal of a rule violation report, holding that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction because the petitioner did not comply with the notice requirements of UCRCCC 5.04.
(6-4: McCarty dissented, joined by Westbrooks, McDonald, and Lawrence.)

Myrick v. UMMC, 2021-WC-01401-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming MWCC order, holding that there was substantial, credible evidence to support the Commission’s finding that the Employer/Carrier overcame the presumption of permanent total disability and that the claimant’s post-injury back surgery was not related to her compensable back injury.
(7-3-0: Westbrooks, McDonald, and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Colson v. Warren, 2021-CA-01408-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming on direct and cross appeal the chancery court’s decisions denying a claim to dissolve a two-member LLC, holding that the two members should cooperate in drafting and implementing an operating agreement and opening a bank account to deposit rental revenue checks payable to the LLC that had been piling up.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Renfroe v. Parker, 2021-CA-01048-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the law-enforcement defendants in a wrongful death suit after a suspect was killed by a deputy, holding:
1. Res judicata did not bar the plaintiff’s state law tort claims after the federal district court dismissed her 1983 claims with prejudice and her state law claims without prejudice.
2. The deputy and the sheriff were entitled to immunity on the official-capacity claims
3. Collateral estoppel barred the claims for IIED, assault, and battery because the federal district court found that the deputy’s use of force was “objectively reasonable.”
4. Even if collateral did not bar the IIED, assault, and battery claims, the plaintiff did not come forward with evidence to defeat summary judgment.
(7-2: McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks. Judge Emfinger did not participate.)

NOTE – According to testimony, the deputy shot the suspect after the suspect charged at the deputy, withstood a taser (pulling the electrodes out of his chest), had a physical altercation with the deputy, and then charged at the deputy a second time. The fact that the suspect did this while wearing pajama pants did not sway the courts at any level.

Other Orders

Green v. State, 2021-KA-01019-COA (rehearing denied)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 14, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. There was nary a dissent, but a conviction of child exploitation was reversed. The are other felony opinions, two divorce cases, a contract case involving a defunct LLC, and a PCR case.

Nunn v. State, 2021-KA-01371-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of having meth within 1,500 feet of a church, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for mental competency evaluation where the trial court twice held a hearing to determine whether the defendant understood and appreciated the significance of the trial proceedings and had the ability to rationally aid in his defense or in denying the defendant’s entrapment instruction.
(10-0)

Singh v. State, 2022-CP-00273-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding no error in revoking post-release supervision since the plaintiff absconded from supervision.
(10-0)

Williams v. Williams, 2021-CA-00758-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment of divorce, holding that the chancellor’s valuation of the marital residence was based on evidentiary support in the record.
(10-0)

Wakefield v. State, 2021-KA-00187-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of accessory after the fact to murder, to kidnapping, and to auto theft, holding:
1. The circuit court had jurisdiction because it sat in one of the counties where the crimes were committed;
2. That the convictions did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause even though the defendant gave just one car ride because he was an accessory to three distinct felonies so the merger doctrine did not apply;
3. That there was no error based on the weight or sufficiency of the evidence;
4. That the indictment was not defective for failing to include “intent” where it did include “willfully;” and
5. That there was no error in admitting autopsy and crime scene photos.
(8-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Emfinger did not participate)

NOTE – These convictions stemmed from the kidnapping and murder of six-year-old Kingston Frazier in 2017.

Holmes v. Lankford, 2022-CA-00203-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming summary judgment for the defendant in a dispute over a sand and gravel operation agreement, holding that the plaintiff did not have standing to enforce the agreement that was between the defendant and the plaintiff’s administratively dissolved LLC and that the plaintiff did not otherwise show he was entitled to relief.
(10-0)

NOTE – Conducting business through an LLC can cut both ways:

Mason v. State, 2021-KA-00964-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of child exploitation, holding that the trial court erred in denying funds for an independent computer forensics expert because the State’s witness/detective should have been considered an expert and that this error hindered the defendant’s jurisdictional challenge and led to evidentiary errors that contributed to an unfair trial.
(7-3-0: Wilson, Smith, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result)

Moss v. Moss, 2021-CA-00452-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Modified opinion on motion for rehearing affirming the chancellor’s decision granting the wife divorce on the ground of habitual cruel and inhuman treatment, holding that there was substantial evidence to support that finding (read the facts for yourself if you have doubts), that the subject matter of wife’s expert’s opinions was adequately disclosed and was not even a basis for the chancellor’s decision, and the husband’s claim for separate maintenance was moot since the divorce was affirmed.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Hornsby v. Hornsby, 2020-CA-01091-COA (dismissing motion for attorney’s fees)

Blount v. State, 2021-KA-00204-COA (denying rehearing)

Mayberry v. Cottonport Hardwoods, 2021-CA-00246-COA (denying rehearing)

Anderson v. State, 2021-KA-01340-COA (granting pro se motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing and recalling mandate)

Easterling v. State, 2022-CA-00796-COA (vacating circuit court’s order and rendering judgment dismissing motion for PCR)

Hunter v. State, 2022-TS-01269-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 28, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions today. Two are domestic relations cases: one dealing with child support and the other primarily dealing with custody. The third decisions is a PCR case.

Everett v. State, 2021-CP-01415-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary denial of a motion for PCR alleging an illegal sentence, holding no error because the sentence imposed was the maximum punishment authorized by statute at the time.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only; Smith did not participate)

If you would like to receive an email with my summaries when they are posted, enter your email address below and click “Subscribe” – You can always unsubscribe later.

White v. White, 2021-CA-01074-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision ordering past-due child support for the period of time from when the parties’ youngest child turned 18 until she turned 21, holding that there was no evidence presented that the child was emancipated before turning 21.
(10-0)

Latham v. Latham, 2022-CA-00363-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming chancellor’s divorce judgment, holding that the chancellor did not err in the application of the Albright factors or in finding that one party did not provide a financial disclosure to the court.
(9-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Other Orders

Tennesen v. City of Hattiesburg, 2021-CA-00137-COA (denying rehearing)

Wallace v. State, 2021-CP-01149-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 21, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions yesterday and I have just now been able to sit down and make it through them. These opinions include a wrongful-death MTCA claim, a complaint for public records, two wills and estates cases, and some PCR thrown in the mix.

Humphrey v. Steve Holts, 2021-CA-00046-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the chancery court’s order dismissing a complaint for public records and quashing subpoenas, holding that the chancellor erred in dismissing the complaint without an evidentiary hearing to examine the records at issue and remanding for an evidentiary hearing.
(9-1-0: Smith concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Baker v. State, 2021-CP-01277-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary denial of a verified motion for PCR, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the indictment properly charged the plaintiff with burglary of a dwelling.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Avery v. Estate of Eric Lane Avery, 2022-CP-00163-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancery court’s order closing the estate, holding that the chancery court did not err in closing the estate without proceeding on a request to amend the death certificate and that there was no evidence that the daughter/beneficiary willfully, knowingly, or intentionally killed her father.
(10-0)

Buchanan v. Hope Federal Credit Union, 2021-CA-00218-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s order denying a motion to transfer venue in an action to confirm an arbitration award, holding that the failure to tender required payment at the designated address was a “substantial omission” that made the county where the payment was to be made a permissible venue.
(6-2-1: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part; Emfinger did not participate.)

Maxwell v. Panola County, Mississippi, 2021-CA-01001-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming a defense verdict in an MTCA lawsuit stemming from a double-fatality car crash with a sheriff’s deputy, holding that whether the deputy acted with reckless disregard when he ran a stop sign immediately before the collision was a question of fact and substantial evidence supported the trial court’s finding that it was not more than simple negligence.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Buchanan v. State, 2021-CP-01069-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming motion for PCR challenging the revocation of post-release supervision, holding that the circuit court did not err in ruling that the plaintiff’s due process rights were not violated and that the plaintiff’s laches argument was both waived and meritless.
(10-0)

Estate of Charles James Bell v. Estate of Sarah Dell Mann Bell, 2021-CA-00789-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancery court’s enforcement of an antenuptial agreement, holding that the chancery court did not err in determining that the antenuptial agreement was not a testamentary document that the wife revoked by a subsequent will, was supported by consideration, and was not substantively unconscionable, and that the husband waived his statutory right to renounce the wife’s will.
(6-1-3: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; McDonald dissented, joined by Barnes and Westbrooks.)

Other Orders

Arrington v. Anderson, 2021-CA-00233-COA (denying rehearing)

Belmer v. State, 2021-CP-00410-COA (denying rehearing)

Jarvis v. State, 2021-CP-00930-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 14, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down ten opinions on this Valentine’s Day. These opinions cover a lot of territory including criminal, custody, personal injury, and PCR.

Clayton v. State, 2021-KA-00505-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err by refusing the defendant’s lesser-included instructions and that the evidence was sufficient to support the deliberate design element for both counts.
(10-0)

Kirk v. State, 2021-KA-00733-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

MIMG C Woodridge Sub LLC v. Course, 2021-CA-00535-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming award for past and future pain and suffering against an apartment complex to a plaintiff whose apartment was burglarized by someone who used an office key, holding that the award of $450,000 in noneconomic damages ($250,000 for past; $200,000 for future) was not excessive based on the evidence.
(8-2: Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes)

NOTE – The jury also awarded $42,080 in economic damages for the stolen items medical bills for psychiatric care.

Hull v. State, 2022-CP-00088-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial the plaintiff’s PCR petition, holding that the plaintiff was properly sentenced, he was not denied effective assistance, and his motion to receive a copy of his record and transcript was moot.
(10-0)

Stevenson v. State, 2021-KA-00411-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that allowing the State’s forensic pathologist testify remotely violated the Confrontation Clause because there was no case-specific determination of necessity but that it was harmless error since there was other sufficient evidence to support the verdict.
(5-5-0: Wilson, Lawrence, Smith, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without separate written opinion)

McFarland v. State, 2021-CA-01311-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming in part and reversing/rendering in part the trial court’s rulings on a petition to correct eligibility for parole, holding that the trial court erred in treating the petition as a motion to modify the sentence and that the trial court had jurisdiction to consider the petition but also holding that the record supported a finding that the plaintiff was not eligible for parole.
(8-1-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Jordan v. State, 2021-KA-01421-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery of the defendant’s minor stepdaughter, holding that the trial court did not err in allowing a sexual assault nurse examiner was not reversible error, that the trial court did not err in admitting “nanny cam” video into evidence, that trial counsel’s lack of hearsay objection to a letter did not affect the outcome, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge Smith did not participate)

Rye v. State, 2021-CA-00477-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing denial of motion for PCR, holding that the trial court erred in denying the motion on the basis that the guilty plea prevented the plaintiff from asserting that newly discovered evidence existed that could prove his innocence.
(10-0)

Denham v. Lafayette County Department of CPS, 2021-CA-00871-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming judgment terminating a mother’s parental rights, holding that the chancellor’s ruling was based on substantial credible evidence and that there was no merit to her arguments regarding her attorney’s performance or the GAL’s report and testimony.
(5-2-2: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Carlton concurred in result only without separate written opinion; McCarty concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks; Greenlee did not participate)

Haynes v. Beckward, 2019-CA-01508-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the trial court judgment’s after a car wreck trial, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the defendant-driver’s testimony that he saw three other cars pass his trailer before the accident without incident or in denying a mistrial after the plaintiff testified about the defendant’s insurance company during cross, but holding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion for remittitur where the awards for future medical expenses and future lost wages exceeded the competent evidence on those elements.
(6-1-3: Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without separate written opinion; Lawrence concurred in part and dissented in part with separate written opinion, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty, and in part by McDonald.)

DISCLOSURE – I was not trial counsel, but I represent the appellants in this appeal.

Other Orders

Smith v. State, 2020-KA-00775-COA (granting motion for authorization to proceed out of time)

Blagodirova v. Schrock, 2020-CA-01162-COA (denying rehearing)

Bowman v. State, 2020-KA-01371-COA (denying rehearing)

Dampier v. State, 2021-KA-00280-COA (denying rehearing)

O’Quinn v. State, 2021-KA-00534-COA (denying motion for permission to proceed out of time)

Keys v. Rehabilitation, Inc., 2021-CA-01338-COA (denying rehearing)

Young v. State, 2022-CP-00141-COA (denying rehearing)

Johnson v. State, 2022-CP-01186-COA (sua sponta allowing appeal to proceed as timely)

Boyett v. State, 2022-TA-01239-COA (sua sponte suspending appeal deadline to allow untimely appeal to proceed on the merits)

Silas v. State, 2022-TS-01265-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 7, 2023

The ever-prolific Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There is a mix of criminal, domestic, and civil cases with a unifying theme of appellees running the table.

Edwards v. State, 2021-KM-01348-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Affirming conviction of first-offense DUI, holding that there was probable cause for the traffic stop and that law enforcement was not required to inform the defendant of his right to an independent and alternative BAC test.
(10-0)

Harrison v. Howard, 2021-CA-00697-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment of contempt for failure to comply with agreed order of modification of child custody and support, holding that the father waived improper service, that the agreed modification order was voidable but not void and he failed to timely appeal it, and that he waived the issue of termination of the mother’s child support obligation by not timely objecting or appealing.
(7-3-0: Wilson, McCarty, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Washington v. State, 2021-KA-01041-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder and armed robbery, holding that the trial court’s comments to the jury that this was not a death penalty case was appropriate clarification of fact and did not prejudice the jury, that the defendant did not prove that the State’s loss of a video lineup was not bad faith, that there was no proof that inadmissible portions of video testimony were played to the jury and so it is presumed that the trial court’s order sustaining an objection to the inadmissible testimony was heeded, and that if admitting a handgun into evidence was error it was invited by the defendant who introduced it.
(7-3-0: Wilson, McCarty, and Emfinger concur in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Pace v. State, 2022-KA-00046-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court erred in admitting photos without a proper foundation but the error was harmless, that the defendant waived the argument that the State made an improper comment during closing by not objecting, and that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s self-defense instruction.
(7-2-0: Wilson and Greenlee concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion, Smith did not participate.)

Brandon v. State, 2021-KA-01239-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon upon receipt of a Lindsey brief and a review of the record finding no arguable issues for appeal.
(10-0)

Lofton v. Lofton, 2021-CA-00035-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming judgment in a fraudulent-transfer of real and personal property lawsuit that is tangential to a pending divorce action, holding that the chancery court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the UFTA supported a finding of fraud or in awarding the prevailing party attorney’s fees.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in the result only.)

NOTE – This is an interesting and fact-bound decision discussing the UFTA.

Mack v. State, 2021-CA-01060-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming denial of expungement, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the plaintiff’s conviction was related to his official duties as a police officer.
(10-0)

Clark v. Tippah County Dept. of Child Protection Services, 2021-CP-01209-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming judgment terminating parental rights, holding that the mother’s due process claims were procedurally barred and without merit and that the chancellor did not err in terminating parental rights.
(7-2-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in the result only; Greenlee did not participate.)

West Jasper Consolidated School District v. Rogers, 2021-CA-00171-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming chancery court’s judgment that the school district breached 16th section lease terms regarding rent adjustments, holding that the chancery court had subject matter jurisdiction, applied the correct standard of review, did not err in finding no material breach by appellees, did not err in overturning the county board’s ruling, and did not err in denying attorney’s fees to the appellant.
(10-0)

Other Orders

La Casa I, LLC v. Gottfried, 2021-CA-00347-COA (denying rehearing)

Belmer v. State, 2021-CP-00398-COA (denying rehearing)

Davis v. State, 2021-KA-00593-COA (denying rehearing)

Howard Industries, Inc. v. Hayes, 2021-WC-00694-COA (denying rehearing)

Meek v. Cheyenne Steel, Inc., 2021-WC-01219-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 31, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions today. Two affirm felony convictions and one is a PCR dismissal. One of the criminal cases contains a robust Confrontation Clause discussion between the majority and the dissent.

Williams v. State, 2022-KA-00100-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction for armed robbery, holding that there was no reversible error in admitting testimony from a detective that was not objected to and that neither the failure to object to that or defense counsel’s cross-examination of the detective constituted ineffective assistance.
(7-3-0: Judge Wilson, Judge McCarty, and Judge Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

McConn v. State, 2021-CP-00431-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion asserting ineffective assistance, holding that the trial court did not err in summarily dismissing the motion that was supported only by the movant’s affidavit and an immaterial affidavit and was contradicted by the record.
(9-1-0: Judge Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Pitts v. State, 2021-KA-00740-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery of his minor daughter, holding that placing a screen between the child and the defendant during the child’s testimony did not violate the Confrontation Clause or the Due Process Clause where the defendant was able to observe the child via camera during the entirety of her testimony; the trial court did not err in excluding the testimony of the defendant’s expert witnesses where their disclosure was untimely or in allowing the testimony under the tender-years exception; and there was no cumulative error.
(6-1-2: Judge McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge Wilson dissented, joined by Judge Westbrooks and joined in part by Judge McDonald. Judge Emfinger did not participate.)

NOTE – The dissent argued that the use of the screen was a violation of the Confrontation Clause:

Other Orders

Burns v. State, 2021-KA-00310-COA (denying rehearing)

Wilson v. State, 2021-KA-00608-COA (denying rehearing)

Loblolly Properties, LLC v. Le Papillon Homeowner’s Association Inc., 2021-CA-00767-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 24, 2023

The Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. Three criminal cases and three PCR cases. I don’t anticipate any of the PCR cases today drawing the sort of attention the Hathorn case drew last week.

Wells v. State, 2021-KA-00747-COA (Civil – Felony)
Affirming conviction for sale of meth, holding that testimony from a confidential informant about the defendant’s past drug selling activity was elicited by defense counsel on cross and not purposeful elicited by the DA and that it was not error to refuse the defendant’s preferred instruction on weighing confidential informant testimony.
(10-0)

Note – Pithy introductory paragraphs like this could put me out of business:

Thomas v. State, 2021-CP-00060-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the sentence was not illegal, that there was a sufficient factual basis for the kidnapping plea, that the retroactive competency hearing was adequate and proper, and that there was no error in finding the plaintiff competent.
(7-3-0: Judge Wilson, Judge Smith, and Judge Emfinger concurred in part and in the judgment without separate written opinion)

Green v. State, 2021-CP-01299-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the claims were barred by the doctrine of res judicata and the three-year statement of limitations, and the motion was an impermissible successive motion.
(9-0: Judge Lawrence did not participate)

Bradley v. State, 2022-CP-00173-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the motion was both successive and time-barred.
(9-1-0: Judge Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Melendez v. State, 2021-KA-00775-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder and aggravated assault, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, dismissing the ineffective assistance claim without prejudice, and holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in giving a flight instruction.
(10-0)

Alford v. State, 2022-KA-00025-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of trafficking meth with intent to distribute and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(5-5-0: Judge Wilson, Judge McDonald, Judge Lawrence, and Judge McCarty concurred in part and in the result; Judge Westbrooks concurred in the result only without separate written opinion.)

Other Orders

Nguyen v. Bui, 2021-CP-00548-COA (granting appellee’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees) (don’t get excited, they were contractual fees)

Wallace v. State, 2021-CP-01149-COA (recalling mandate and accepting pro se motion for rehearing as timely)

Hendrix v. State, 2022-TS-01217-COA (dismissing appeal for want of appealable judgment)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 17, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. There are several criminal cases, a reversal of summary judgment in a slip and fall case, an arbitration denial, and several PCR cases.

Jones v. State, 2021-KA-01263-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding the trial court did not err in denying a mistrial after a prospective juror mentioned the defendant’s past wrongdoing, that the verdict was based on sufficient evidence and not against the weight of the evidence, and that the ineffective assistance of counsel claim could not be appropriately addressed on direct appeal and denying the issue without prejudice.
(10-0)

Creel v. State, 2021-CP-00977-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of a motion for PCR, holding that the plaintiff was properly sentenced under the statute in place at the time of his offenses and that his guilty pleas were entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.
(9-0: Judge Emfinger did not participate)

Smith v. State, 2021-CA-01259-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the denial of a motion for PCR without evidentiary hearing, holding that the plaintiff’s guilty pleas were knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given, and that the trial court did not err in ruling without an evidentiary hearing.
(9-0: Judge Smith did not participate)

Anderson v. State, 2021-KA-01340-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary, holding that the trial court did not commit reversible error by admitting evidence of crimes in other counties under Rule 404(b) and that there was no merit to the ineffective assistance of counsel claims based on lack of objections to hearsay.
(9-1-0: Judge McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Hathorne v. State, 2021-CA-00306-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a motion for PCR, holding that the indictment was defective for failing to charge a crime but that the claim was procedurally barred.
(2-4-4: Judge Wilson and Judge Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge Lawrence and Judge Smith concurred in the result only; Judge McCarty dissented, joined by Judge Carlton, Judge Westbrooks, and Judge McDonald)

Brooks v. Jeffreys, 2021-CA-01113-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing summary judgment in favor of a defendant in a slip and fall case, holding that there were genuine issues of material fact as to whether the cleaning company breached the duty of care where the plaintiff slipped and fell on the floor of her residence that was actively being mopped when she slipped.
(9-1: Judge Greenlee concurred in part and dissented in part without separate written opinion)

NOTE – Because the plaintiff slipped and fell in her own residence that was being cleaned by the defendant, the Court of Appeals analyzed this is a general negligence action and not a premises liability case.

Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. Hancock, 2021-CA-00605-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming denial of a motion to compel arbitration, holding that where a life insurance policy was voluntarily entered into, cancelled, and then reinstated via forgery of the insured’s signature, the arbitration agreement in the policy was not enforceable.
(6-4: Judge Emfinger dissented, joined by Chief Judge Barnes, Judge Wilson, and Judge Greenlee)

Other Orders

$153,340.00 v. State, 2020-CA-01409-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 10, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. These decisions cover a wide range of areas including wills, felonies, personal injury, defamation, and adoption. One of the more interesting and potentially useful decisions analyzes the admissibility of images from Google Earth and measurements generated by Google Earth.

Perrigin v. State, 2021-KA-00858-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery of a minor, holding that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence, that the Confrontation Clause was not violated since the victim did testify at trial, and that the ineffective assistance of counsel claim should be raised on a PCR petition.
(9-1-0: Judge Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Wilkerson v. Wilkerson, 2021-CA-01208-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s ruling in a will contest, holding that the word “should” was permissive and that, in any event, even if there was a mandatory requirement that one son have an opportunity to purchase a property there was sufficient evidence to support the chancellor’s finding that he did have such a chance.
(10-0)

Bolton v. Lee, 2020-CA-00344-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming a dismissal for failure to state a claim in favor of a banker and a bank and affirming summary judgment in favor of a lawyer and law firm, holding that collateral estoppel barred the plaintiff from recovering in a civil action on the same facts that formed the basis of their criminal convictions of tax evasion and filing false tax returns.
(8-2-0: Judge Wilson and Judge Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Pope v. Martin, 2021-CA-00367-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming in part and reversing in part summary judgment granted in favor of the defendant in a defamation and wiretapping suit, holding that there was no error in granting summary judgment without a hearing or without issuing findings of fact or conclusions of law, and that summary judgment on the defamation claim was proper but that there were genuine fact issues on the wiretapping claim.
(9-1-0: Judge Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

NOTE – Summary judgment rulings made without any accompanying findings of fact and conclusions of law to explain the basis for the decision are frustrating for litigants and parties. This is especially true when no hearing was given. There are certainly cases where such rulings make sense, but when the parties have spent considerable time and energy in briefing issues it is helpful to know why you won or lost. Without an explanation of why summary judgment was granted or denied, litigants do not have an opportunity to see where they went wrong and hone their craft. It also does not help the parties focus the issues on appeal. It is clear that Rule 52 does not apply to summary judgments but rules can always be amended.

Evilsizer v. Beau Rivage Resorts, LLC, 2021-CA-01222-COA (Civil – Personal injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the owner of a cooking trailer who was sued by an 18-wheeler driver who struck the awning of the cooking trailer, holding that the there were no genuine fact issues where the evidence showed that the awning was closed approximately one hour before the collision and there was no evidence that the trailer owner opened the awning before the accident or had actual or constructive notice that the awning was open and extending into the roadway.
(8-1-0: Judge McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Judge Westbrooks did not participate)

Boutwell v. Fairchild, 2021-CA-01046-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming termination of parent rights and allowing adoption, holding that the court had subject matter jurisdiction, that the child was eligible for adoption because the chancery court had properly assumed original and exclusive jurisdiction over the matter, and that the chancellor did not err in finding that parental rights should be terminated.
(8-2-0: Judge McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge McCarty concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Green v. State, 2021-KA-00613-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated domestic violence, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s lesser-included instruction for simple domestic violence because the evidence did not support that instruction.
(10-0)

Taylor v. State, 2021-KA-00721-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of violating state law by living within 3,000 feet of a playground as a registered sex offender, holding that the sex-offender-registry law is not unconstitutionally vague by what is meant by “playground” or how 3,000 feet should be measured and that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, but reversing because the Google Earth map used to calculate the distance was not properly authenticated and contained hearsay.
(6-2-2: Judge Greenlee and Judge Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge Wilson concurred in the result and dissented in part, joined by Judge Greenlee and joined in part by Judge McDonald and Judge McCarty)

NOTES – The majority and the partial dissent engage in a collegial discussion of whether the term “playground” encompasses the property on which a playground sits or just the playground itself, the dissent arguing for the narrow construction. Both the majority and the partial dissent have interesting analyses of the admissibility of Google Earth images and measurements generated by it (without much disagreement on this issue).

Colburn v. State, 2021-KA-00865-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction for sale of meth within 1,500 feet of a church, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence of the defendant’s prior conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to sell.
(5-1-4: Judge Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge McCarty dissented, joined by Judge Westbrooks and Judge McDonald, and joined in part by Judge Lawrence)

Other Orders

None

Hand Down List