Mississippi Court of Appeals – Page 4 – Mississippi Appeals Blog

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 6, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There are several felonies, a wrongful death summary judgment case, a workers’ compensation intoxication case, a wills and estate case, and a few PCR cases. Interestingly enough, the last two PCR cases resulted in voting-line-soup pluralities.

Carr v. State, 2024-KA-00185-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of fondling and sexual battery, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying funding for a defense expert, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony about other alleged prior bad acts, that one conviction of fondling did not merge with the conviction of sexual battery, and that the indictment was not insufficient for the defendant to prepare an adequate defense.
(9-1-0: St. Pe’ opinion; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Smith v. State, 2024-KA-00162-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of ten counts of possession of child pornography but reversing convictions of two counts of sexual battery, holding that the evidence was not sufficient to support the sexual battery convictions, but that the doctrine of retroactive misjoinder did not require reversal of the other convictions and remanded to reconsider sentencing.
(10-0: Weddle opinion)

Good v. Sanders, 2023-CA-00669-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in a wrongful death case where a pedestrian was struck and killed by a driver, holding that there was no evidence that the defendant breached any duty owed to the pedestrian and that the trial judge did not abuse her discretion in not recusing herself.
(7-3*-0: Lawrence opinion; Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by Weddle and St. Pe’ and joined in part by McCarty; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Ruffin v. State, 2024-CA-00867-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion where the petitioner failed to include a supporting affidavit with her PCR motion and acknowledged at her plea hearing that she was freely and voluntarily admitting her guilt.
(9-1-0: McDonald opinion; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Estate of Anderson: Brown v. Fitzgerald, 2023-CA-01131-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision setting aside a deed and ordering conveyance pursuant to the will, holding that substantial evidence supports the chancellor’s findings that the testator suffered from a weakness of intellect and the consideration for the deed was grossly inadequate.
(10-0: Wilson opinion)

Nicolaou v. State, 2023-CP-01007-COA (Civil – PCR)
Vacating the circuit court’s denial of a PCR motion as successive because the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate it.
(10-0: Carlton opinion)

Ladner v. Hinton Homes LLC, 2024-WC-00941-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s decision that a claim was not compensable under the intoxication provision, holding that substantial evidence supported the MWCC’s finding that the claimant failed to prove that intoxication was not a contributing cause of the accident.
(8-2-0: Carlton opinion; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Taylor v. State, 2023-CA-00738-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a PCR motion, holding that although the sentence exceeded the maximum the PCR motion was barred by the statute of limitations.
(3-2-5: Wilson principal opinion; Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence concurred in part and in the result, joined by Emfinger, Weddle, and Set. Pe’, and joined in part by Westbrooks and McCarty; McDonald dissented without writing; McCarty dissented, joined by Barnes, Carlton, Westbrooks, and McDonald.)

Underwood v. State, 2024-CP-00423-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the claims that the petitioner’s plea was involuntary and that his attorney rendered ineffective assistance.
(4-1-4: McCarty principal opinion; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; Lawrence concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Wilson, Emfinger, and St. Pe’; Weddle did not participate.)

Other Orders

Nailer v. State, 2023-KA-00627-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 29, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down two opinions today. One is a PCR case and the other is a direct appeal of a felony conviction. Not much to upsell today.

Harris v. State, 2024-CA-00231-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim lacked merit.
(10-0)

McGee v. State, 2023-KA-00083-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing evidence of his prior arrest, that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, that the claim that the indictment was procedurally barred because it was not raised in the trial court, that the search of the defendant’s car was not illegal, and that the defendant was not subject to an ex post facto violation.
(8-2-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing)

Other Orders

Fox v. State, 2023-KA-00596-COA (denying rehearing)
Young v. Martin, 2023-CA-00980-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 8, 15, and 22, 2025

After a few weeks of attending to other matters, I am back on the blogging horse. Fortunately, the appellate courts went relatively light on me in terms of the number of decisions handed down.

Summaries the hand downs from the Mississippi Court of Appeals from the past three weeks are below. There are several divorce cases, three mal cases (two opinions reached different results after the respective plaintiff’s expert testimony was struck), several MTCA cases, personal injury cases, felonies, an arbitration case, and more.

April 8, 2025

McFall v. Osborne, 2023-CA-01234-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a divorce action denying the ex-husband’s Rule 60(b) motion attacking the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, holding that the chancellor had subject matter jurisdiction, that the ex-husband could not attack the merits of the underlying judgment because it was not appealed in time, and that the chancellor did not err in finding the ex-husband in contempt for failing to pay as ordered in the underlying judgment.
(9-0: Westbrooks did not participate)

Estate of Boleware v. McPhail, 2024-CA-00156-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming with modification the circuit court’s decision staying litigation and compelling arbitration, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the arbitration agreement was valid but modifying the judgment to clarify that the arbitrator must decide whether the claims are within the scope of the arbitration agreement.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in the result without writing)

Short v. Polles, 2023-CA-00607-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of a farmer’s suit against MDWFP for issuing a permit permitting the farmer to kill deer to protect his soybean field but limiting it to does only, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the agency was immune from suit because permit decisions were within the agency’s power and its actions were not arbitrary and capricious.
(8-2-0: Barnes and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

Brooks v. State, 2023-KA-01081-COA (granting pro se motion for time to file motion for rehearing)
Bridget v. State, 2025-TS-00100-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of appealable judgment)

Hand Down Page

April 15, 2025

E. Cornell Malone Corp. v. Marshall Cnty. Sch. Dist., 2024-CA-00047-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of a complaint against the County related to a construction project, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the tort claims were barred by the MTCA’s one-year statute of limitations or in denying the motion to amend the complaint.
(9-1-0: Carlton dissented without separate written opinion)

Anderson v. State, 2023-KA-00967-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of murder, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Pinkton v. State, 2024-CP-00655-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the claims were time-barred, waived, and without merit.
(6-4-0: McCarty concurred, joined by Wilson, Emfinger, and Weddle)

Goodson v. State, 2023-KA-00729-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress, in granting the State’s motion in limine preventing the defendant from raising the defense of bias against by the sheriff’s department, or in denying his motion for JNOV or for new trial.
(10-0)

Jordan v. State, 2023-KA-00965-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of shooting into a dwelling after reviewing the record and counsel’s Lindsey brief, holding that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and no issues warranting reversal.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Holifield v. Highland Community Hospital, 2023-CA-01342-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming dismissal of MTCA claims against a community hospital, holding that the trial court did not err in determining that the community hospital was a division of a governmental entity and not a separate entity that could be sued or in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend to substitute the correct governmental entity because the claim would be time-barred.
(7-3-0: Wilson, McDonald, and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Lee v. Doolittle, 2023-CA-00969-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Reversing summary judgment in favor of the defendants in a med mal case, holding that the circuit court abused its discretion in striking the plaintiff’s expert and then in granting summary judgment for lack of expert testimony.
(5-1-4: Wilson concurred in part and in the judgment without writing; Carlton dissented, joined by Barnes, Emfinger, and St. Pe’)

Other Orders

Miller v. State, 2023-CP-00322-COA (denying rehearing)
Estate of Forkner: Berry v. Forkner, 2023-CA-00707-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

April 22, 2025

Nabors v. State, 2024-KA-00006-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault of law enforcement, holding that there was sufficient evidence of the defendant’s intent to commit aggravated assault, that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not commit plain error in giving a flight instruction, and that trial counsel was not ineffective.
(10-0)

Crocker v. Daves, 2023-CA-00602-COA (Civil – Custody)
Dismissing appeal in a custody matter, holding that the chancellor’s order holding child support in abeyance due to insufficient information before the court to award child support based on statutory guidelines was not a final, appealable order.
(10-0)

Elmore v. Elmore, 2023-CA-00875-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming a judgment granting divorce and dividing marital property, holding that the chancellor did not err in classifying assets as marital property, in determining what property was marital property or in equitably distributing marital assets, or in denying the motion for new trial or to alter or amend the judgment.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and dissented in part; St. Pe’ did not participate)

Mallery v. State, 2024-CP-00220-COA (Civil – PCR)
Dismissing appeal of PCR denial, holding that there was no longer an actual controversy since the petitioner had been released from custody.
(9-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Simmons v. City of Picayune, 2024-CA-00092-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment dismissing a premises liability claim stemming from a fall on a handicap ramp, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact that the curb ramp constituted a dangerous condition.
(10-0)

Cox v. Coast 132 LLC, 2023-CA-01290-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a restaurant in a slip-and-fall case, holding that the windowsill that allegedly caused the fall was not a dangerous condition and that even if it was a dangerous condition the plaintiff could not prove that the restaurant created it or had actual or constructive knowledge of it.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Sandlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 2023-CP-01347-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming dismissal of a pro se UM claim, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the defendant had not been properly served with process and that the statute of limitations on the claim had run.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Younger v. Southern, 2022-CA-01228-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming part and reversing in part the circuit court’s judgment after a bench trial in a personal injury claim under the MTCA, affirming the award for the loss of the plaintiff’s truck, but reversing the award of damages for past, present, and future pain and suffering and reversing the award of $21,120 in medical damages for lack of expert testimony and rendering an award of $399 for past medical expenses.
(7-3: Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald and McCarty; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty)

Calvin-Williams v. The Greenville Clinic, P.A., 2023-CA-01021-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, holding that the circuit court did not err in striking portions of the plaintiff’s expert’s testimony and then granting summary judgment based on the lack of expert testimony.
(8-2: McDonald dissented, joined by Westbrooks)

Other Orders

Parker v. State, 2023-KA-00550-COA (denying rehearing)
Estate of Roberts: Herd v. Stokes, 2023-CA-00713-COA (denying rehearing)
Gardner v. State, 2023-KA-00903-COA (denying rehearing)
Lawson v. State, 2023-CP-01008-COA (denying rehearing)
Jack v. City of Meridian, 2023-CC-01339-COA (denying pro se motion to recall mandate and dismissing motion for rehearing and amended motion for rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 1, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. One case is a relatively novel appeal of a chancellor’s decision denying a name-change petition. There is also an MTCA/breach of contract/inverse condemnation case along with a couple of felony appeals and a couple of PCR cases.

Haralson v. State, 2023-CP-01309-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion challenging revocation of post-release supervision, holding that the trial court did not err in summarily dismissing the motion.
(10-0)

Hatchett v. State, 2024-KA-00100-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of sexual battery, holding that the conviction was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Hulitt v. State, 2024-CA-00182-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of motion for PCR, holding that the trial court that adjudicated the charged offenses to which he pleaded guilty was a county of venue.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Emfinger did not participate)

Rogers v. City of Lumberton, 2023-CA-01133-COA (Civil – Property Damage)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the circuit court’s order granting the City’s motion to dismiss, holding that the trial court did not err in dismissing the plaintiff’s negligence claims for non-compliance with the pre-suit notice requirements of the MTCA or in dismissing the breach of contract claim, but that the trial court did err in dismissing the inverse condemnation claim because it was not subject to the pre-suit requirements of the MTCA.
(10-0)

In Re Name Change: Petitioner Yasmine Montia Jones, By and Through Her Guardian and Conservator, John D. K. Taylor, 2023-CA-01343-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision denying a petition to change the last name of a adult woman with disabilities, holding that the chancellor improperly substituted his judgment for that of the guardian without sufficient evidentiary support.
(8-2: Wilson dissented, joined by Lawrence)

Phinizee v. State, 2023-KA-01090-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of conspiracy and attempt to commit murder, holding that the conviction for conspiracy to commit murder was supported by sufficient evidence, that the trial court did not err by excluding hearsay testimony that the victim previously attacked the defendant, and that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s requested instruction on the lesser offense of aggravated domestic violence.
(10-0)

Other Orders

Pilot Travel Centers, LLC v. Womack, 2023-CA-00035-COA (denying rehearing)
Alexander v. State, 2023-KA-00331-COA (denying rehearing)
Williams v. State, 2023-KA-00346-COA (denying rehearing)
Patton v. State, 2023-CP-00618-COA (denying rehearing)
The University of Mississippi Medical Center v. Redd, 2023-CA-00711-COA (denying rehearing)
Mallard v. State, 2023-CP-01155-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 25, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. One opinion is an appeal from a hybrid MTCA/common law med mal trial that cites a law journal article I wrote several years ago on an unresolved procedural conundrum. There is also a premises liability summary judgment case, a breach of contract/attorney’s fees case, three direct criminal appeals, and two PCR cases.

Brown v. State, 2023-CA-00921-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR, holding that the trial court did not err in summarily dismissing the PCR petition as time-barred.
(10-0)

Foote v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport, 2023-CA-00504-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit court’s judgment in a med mal action against a hospital (a public entity) and a surgeon and the surgeon’s clinic (private entities) after a single, bifurcated bench and jury trial in which the trial court dismissed the claims against the hospital, holding that if the trial court relied on counsel’s closing statements as evidence it was error but harmless because there was sufficient evidence on the point, that the trial court did not err in finding that the plaintiff failed to present a prima facie case that the surgeon proximately caused or contributed to the injuries, and that the plaintiff failed to object to the jury’s involvement in the MTCA claim so the trial court did not err in partially bifurcating the trial where the jury decided the claims against the private defendants and gave an advisory verdict as to the public defendant, and that the trial court did not err in allowing the jury to allocate fault to the public defendant and the finding that the allocation was not supported by substantial evidence.
(7-2-1: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing, Lawrence dissented)

NOTE – I was excited to see one of my law review articles cited in this opinion. (If you are so inclined, you can read my article here.) There is no clear guidance from the rules or case law as to how trials should proceed when there a public defendant (entitled to a bench trial under the MTCA) and private defendant (entitled to a jury trial under Mississippi’s constitution, et al). I advocated for a specific procedure in the article that was cited in today’s opinion. In today’s case, the public defendant advocated for the procedure I proposed and the plaintiff argued for a different approach that involved the jury rendering an advisory verdict as to the public defendant. The trial court adopted the plaintiff’s approach. The plaintiff complained about the procedure on appeal, but the Court of Appeals held he could not argue that the trial court erred in following his proposal. Here is the Court of Appeals’ recapitulation of the argument following my proposal:

In 2016, the Rules Committee on Civil Procedure solicited input for a “Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure Revision Project.” I submitted a proposed amendment to Rule 38 along with a copy of my article:

I never did hear anything back.

Blumer v. Majestic Homes, LLC, 2024-CA-00163-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of a homeowner against a home builder awarding liquidated damages, attoyne’s fees, and expenses, holding that the trial court did not err entering a corrected order granting relief under Rule 60(b) since there had been no judgment expressly adjudicating the remaining claims and that the trial court did not err in dismissing the claims against the home builder in his individual capacity, but that the trial court did err in reducing the award of attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Dewberry v. State, 2023-KA-01135-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of sexual battery, one count of fondling, and one count of child exploitation, holding that the trial court did not err in seating jurors after a Batson challenge and that a jury instruction did not constitute a constructive substantive amendment of a count in the indictment under the plain-error doctrine.
(10-0)

Rodriguez v. Diamondhead Country Club, 2024-CA-00238-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendant in a premises liability case, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that a one-half-inch height differential between sidewalk slabs was not a dangerous or unreasonably hazardous condition or in finding that there was no evidence to support a negligence per se claim under the ADA where the plaintiff was not disabled.
(10-0)

Thomas v. State, 2023-KA-00512-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting a Facebook post, that the trial court did not err denying a directed verdict under Weathersby, that the conviction was support by sufficient evidence, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress the defendant’s statements to law enforcement, that the trial court did not err in admitting autopsy photos, and that the cumulative error doctrine did not apply.
(8-2-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Rasberry v. State, 2023-KA-01161-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of failing to register as a sex offender, holding that the lack of specificity in the indictment was at most harmless error, that the trial court did not err by granting an unopposed motion to amend the indictment, and that trial counsel was not ineffective.
(10-0)

Deer v. State, 2024-CP-00019-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court properly dismissed the motion pursuant to the UPCCRA’s three-year statute of limitations.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Other Orders

None

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 18, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions on Tuesday. There is something for everybody with a workers’ comp case, an unemployment case, a direct criminal appeal, a premises liability case, and a PCR case.

King v. State, 2023-CA-00770-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the circuit court’s dismissal of the claimant’s motion for PCR wherein he claimed the circuit court improperly revoked probation and participation in drug court and imposed his original suspended sentence, holding that the claimant was statutorily barred from participating in drug court because he was charged with and pleaded guilty to a crime of violence, and since his probation was revoked only twice for violations of drug court conditions, the circuit court lacked authority to impose the full sentence, and remanding with instructions to reinstate the probation.
(5-2-3: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Emfinger concurred in result only without writing; Lawrence dissented, joined by Weddle and St. Pe’, joined in part by Emfinger)

Porter v. State, 2023-KA-00809-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress the defendant’s (who was 17 at the time) statements to police, that the defendant had no viable Sixth Amendment claim based on the size and composition of the jury venire without proof that minorities were intentionally or systematically excluded because of their race, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting the defendant’s attorney’s opening statement, that the trial court did not err in limiting the defendant’s questioning of a witness for impeachment purposes, that the trial court did not err by excluding two character witnesses, that the trial court did not err by refusing the defendant’s lesser-included offense instruction of manslaughter because they had no foundation in the evidence and because a reasonable jury could find the defendant guilty of capital murder, that the trial court did not err by not granting a mistrial for the State’s remarks during closing, and that the trial court did not err by not granting a mistrial when the jury sent out its first note because the defendant did not obtain a ruling and because the assignment was meritless, and that the cumulative error doctrine did not apply.
(8-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Animal Rescue Fund of Mississippi v. Mississippi Department of Employment Security, 2024-CC-00152-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming an award of unemployment benefits after MDES initially determined that the claimant voluntarily left his employment, holding that the Board of Review’s decision was supported by substantial evidence so the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in affirming it.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Harris v. Casino Vicksburg, LLC, 2023-CA-00959-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a casino in a premises liability case arising from a chair that slipped out from under the plaintiff, holding that the plaintiff failed to show the existence of a dangerous condition.
(7-3: Westbrooks dissented, joined by Carlton and McDonald)

Caffey v. Forrest Health, 2023-WC-01232-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s decision reversing the AJ’s finding that the claimant sustained a 50% loss of wage-earning capacity, holding that the though the MWCC erred in its Jordan analysis on whether employment was offered post-MMI the claimant nonetheless did not make a prima facie case under Jordan because he never reported back to work after MMI or under Thompson because there was no evidence the claimant independently searched for employment.
(8-1-1: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Other Orders

Ellzey v. State, 2022-KA-00797-COA (denying rehearing)
Allred v. Tishomingo County, Mississippi, 2023-CA-00569-COA (denying rehearing)
Old Hattiesburg High, L.P. v. Harris Construction Services, LLC, 2023-CA-00579-COA (denying rehearing)
Sullivant v. Freeland, 2023-CP-01393-COA (granting appelles’ motion for monetary sanctions)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 11, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions today. Two criminal appeal (one with a reversal), a sales tax liability case, and a 12(b)(6) dismissal of a tort suit against an attorney for filing a motion to quash a post-trial deposition subpoena on behalf of a client.

McCoy V. Graham, 2024-CA-00286-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the DOR assessment of tax liabilities for failure to pay sales tax, holding that the evidence showed that the DOR filed its responsible person assessment within thirty-six months from the date the tax liability became final.
(10-0)

Sullivant v. Freeland, 2023-CP-01393-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming order granting motion to dismiss complaint and denying the motion to amend the complaint, holding that the plaintiff’s tort suit against an attorney who moved to quash the plaintiff’s post-trial deposition on behalf of a client in another case failed to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) and that any amendment would be futile.
(10-0)

Harper v. State, 2022-KA-00758-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after convictions of three counts of culpable negligence manslaughter and one count of felony fleeing, holding that the prosecution for the offense of felony fleeing was not commenced within two years of the date of the offense and was therefore barred by the statute of limitations, and remanding for resentencing on the three counts of culpable negligence manslaughter.
(7-3: Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald, and Lawrence)

Jordan v. State, 2023-KA-01222-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first degree murder, holding that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Other Orders

Tisdale v. South Central Regional Medical Center, 2023-CA-00231-COA (denying rehearing)
Eason v. South Central Regional Medical Center, 2023-CA-00261-COA (denying rehearing)
Baker v. State, 2023-KA-01111-COA (recalling mandate to allow pro se motion for rehearing to proceed on its merits)
Collins v. State, 2024-TS-01333-COA (granting motion to proceed out of time)
Siggers v. State, 2025-TS-00041-COA (finding pro se appellant’s response to show-cause issue well taken)
Ashby v. State, 2025-TS-00076-COA (allowing appeal to proceed on the merits)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 4, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions today. Three of the cases involved state boards and agencies: one unemployment case, one termination case, and one case where a petitioner sought to amend or append his birth certificate. There are also two direct criminal appeals.

Darden v. MDES, 2024-CC-00159-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming denial of unemployment benefits as untimely, holding that substantial record evidence supported the circuit court’s order affirming the agency’s decision.
(10-0)

Jack v. City of Meridian, 2023-CC-01339-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming employment termination, holding that the decision was not arbitrary and capricious and not in good faith, that the city provided substantial evidence that the plaintiff violated policies, and that the evidence did not show that the plaintiff was arbitrarily treated differently from two white male officers.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in result only without writing)

Malone-Bey v. Mississippi State Board of Health, 2024-SA-00288-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision denying a petition to amend birth certificate to designate the petitioner’s race as “white: Asiatic/Moor,” holding that the chancery court correctly ruled that it lacked the authority to amend a birth certificate to include additional categories of information and that neither the Board or the chancery court violated the petitioner’s constitutional or civil rights.
(10-0)

Terry v. State, 2023-KA-00979-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of kidnapping, holding that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the kidnapping conviction, that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing the victim’s testimony about the crimes of co-defendants, and that the defendant’s proposed simple assault instruction was properly rejected.
(10-0)

McNaughton v. State, 2023-KA-01099-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder after the defendant drove over his ex-girlfriend in a parking lost causing fatal injuries, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion admitting evidence of prior incidents of domestic abuse, that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction, and that the conviction was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-1-0: Wesbtrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

In the Interest of A.R.H., a Minor: Malone v. Jackson County Dept. of Child Protective Services, 2023-CA-00420-COA (denying rehearing)
Arnold v. State, 2023-KA-00519-COA (denying rehearing)
Cauthen v. State, 2023-KA-00589-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 25, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today and a bonus opinion Thursday of last week. There is a notably high reversal rate in these cases. The decision from last Thursday reversed a conviction of capital murder. The eight decisions handed down today cover personal injury, custody, divorce, felony convictions, wills and estates, and PCR with five of them at least reversing the trial court in part.

February 20, 2025

Roncali v. State, 2023-KA-00173-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of capital murder and remanding for a new trial, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict but that trial court abused its discretion allowing a State’s expert to testify that the manner of death was homicide from a third person injecting methamphetamine into the victim.
Expert Testimony: 8-2 (Carlton dissented as to this issue, joined by Barnes, Lawrence, and St. Pe’)
Sufficiency of the evidence: 8-2 (Carlton concurred as to this issue, joined by Barnes, Lawrence, and St. Pe’; Westbrooks dissented as to this issue, joined by McDonald and joined in party by McCarty who joined the principal opinion)

February 25, 2025

In the Matter of Disbursement of Real Property Assets to Heir and/or The Sale of Real Property: Montgomery v. Whatley, 2022-CP-00992-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing order permitting disbursement of real property one of the decedent’s children, holding that there was insufficient evidence in the record to support the chancellor’s finding that the decedent was the fee simple owner of the tract at issue and remanding to set aside the “Executrix’s Deed” and for further proceedings.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Lawrence did not participate)

Trehern v. Spivey, 2023-CA-01002-COA (Civil – Custody)
Reversing the chancellor’s custody modification order awarding the father legal and physical custody with no visitation awarded to the mother, holding that the chancellor did not find or identify any material change in circumstances, did not separately assess whether the change was adverse to the child’s welfare, and did not make on-the-record findings as to the Albright factors.
(10-0)

Crump v. State, 2023-CP-00795-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding it the motion untimely, successive, and barred by res judicata.
(10-0)

Fairchild v. KS Ocean Springs Real Estate LLC, 2023-CA-00928-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendants in a premises liability case, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in striking an affidavit supporting the plaintiff’s opposition as a discovery violation and did not err in finding that there was no evidence that the defendants had actual or constructive knowledge of a dangerous condition.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Black v. Black, 2023-CA-01098-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s order modifying custody in favor of the father, holding that the mother’s appeal of the modification judgment was not timely and therefore barred and that the trial court did not err in denying her relief from the judgment under Rule 60(b).
(10-0)

Practice Point – The Court noted that the Rule 60(b) motion filed more than ten days after the judgment does not toll the time for filing an appeal:

Colbert v. Colbert, 2022-CA-01293-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s decision denying the husband’s claim for divorce and granting the wife’s request for separate maintenance and child support, holding that the husband’s argument that the antenuptial agreement bars a grant of separate maintenance was procedurally barred for failure to present it to the trial court but reversing on the child support issue because the chancellor did not make the required findings of fact.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Star v. State, 2023-KA-00788-COA (Civil – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing/rendering in part after the defendant was convicted of aggravated assault and being a felon in possession of a weapon, holding that the indictment and jury instruction for felon in possession of a weapon were deficient for failing to include the elements and reversing the conviction of felon in possession, but holding that the trial court did not err regarding the aggravated assault jury instruction.
(7-2-1: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Barnes concurred in result only without writing; Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part)

Roberts v. Roberts, 2023-CA-00934-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s equitable division of the marital estate and award of alimony, holding that the chancellor erred in valuing the husband’s business and other assets which required remand on both the equitable division and alimony decisions.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Other Orders

Alexander v. Metropolitan Y.M.C.A., 20233-CP-01092-COA (denying rehearing)
Magee v. State, 2023-CP-00008-COA (denying rehearing)
Chung v. State, 2023-CA-00362-COA (denying rehearing)
Doukas v. Kiln Self Storage, 2023-WC-01195-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 18, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today and one bonus opinion Thursday of last week. There are a few real property cases including a restrictive covenants case. There are two interesting speedy trial cases among several other direct criminal appeals.

February 13, 2025

Johnson v. Cleveland, 2023-CA-01011-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision in a tax sale and forfeited tax land patents, holding that a potential adverse possession claim did not confer standing, that the plaintiff lacked standing per section 29-1-21, and that the chancellor erred in declaring the tax sale void and ordering that the forfeited tax land patents be cancelled.
(6-4: Westbrooks dissented, joined by Barnes, McDonald, and Lawrence)

February 18, 2025

Wallace v. State, 2023-KA-00721-COA consolidated with 2023-KA-00723-COA, consolidated with 2023-KA-00888-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of three brothers who were tried together of capital murder, holding that the convictions were supported by sufficient evidence, that the trial court’s decision to allow an investigator to testify about a witness’s prior statement was harmless error, that the trial court did not in error for allowing testimony of prior bad acts to which there was no timely objection, that there was no violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial under the totality of the circumstances, and that one brother’s ineffective assistance of counsel argument was without merit.
(7-3-0: Lawrence and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Note – The speedy trial discussion is worth reading if that is in your wheelhouse.

1st Step Sober Living LLC v. Cleveland, 2023-CA-00665-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision granting residents’ request for injunctive relief preventing a home in a subdivision from being used by individuals recovering from substance abuse disorder, holding that the sale of the subject property did not render the case moot because damages were sought, that the proposed use was a commercial endeavor that was prohibited by restrictive covenants, and the chancellor did not err in determining that the rehab home did not sufficiently prove that the tenants would fit the “handicap” criteria for FHA purposes.
(10-0)

Brooks v. State, 2023-KA-01081-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance and being a felon in possession of a firearm, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support both convictions.
(10-0)

Chambers v. State, 2023-KA-00626-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of capital murder and two counts of felonious child abuse, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress her statement to investigators where she voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived her Miranda rights and that the State presented sufficient evidence for all convictions.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

LoanMax, LLC v. Castle Columbus I, LLC, 2023-CA-00790-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancery court’s rulings in a claim for declaratory and injunctive relief involving a commercial lease renewal, holding on direct appeal that the chancellor did not err in finding that lessee did not provide notice required to effectively renew the lease, on cross-appeal that the chancellor did not err in finding that the owner is not entitled to damages for roofing or HVAC or to attorney’s fees, and on cross-appeal that the chancellor erred in her findings on holdover rent and remanded for a determination of what back rent may be owed.
(9-0: Barnes did not participate)

Taylor v. State, 2023-KA-00245-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, holding that the defendant’s right to speedy trial was not violated.
(7-4*-0: McCarty specially concurred, joined by McDonald and St. Pe (who also joined the majority); Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Note – The constitutional right to speedy trial got a lot of air time today. Here is how McCarty’s special concurrence on the subject kicks off:

Spearman v. State, 2023-KA-01091-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that there were no arguable issues for appeal after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(10-0)

Fears v. State, 2023-KA-00174-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, armed robbery, conspiracy to commit armed robbery, and aggravated assault against victims responding to a fake Facebook Marketplace ad, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying an accomplice jury instruction.
(10-0)

Johnson v. State, 2023-KA-00369-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of capital murder and felony child abuse, holding that the defendant abandoned his motion to server the counts against him when he failed to pursue a motion to hearing a decision and, further, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion denying the motion to sever.
(10-0)

Other Orders

Johnson v. SW Gaming, LLC, 2023-CA-00505-COA (denying rehearing)
Simmons v. State, 2023-KA-00518-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page – February 18, 2025

Hand Down Page – February 13, 2025