Tag: Mississippi Court of Appeals

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 27, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eleven opinions today. The majority are PCR cases, but there are a few direct criminal appeals, a personal injury case, and a divorce case.

Magee v. State, 2023-CP-00008-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err by failing to appoint counsel to represent the petitioner at his evidentiary hearing, finding that the guilty pleas were knowing/intelligent/voluntary, or in denying the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.
(9-0)

Haley v. State, 2023-CP-00918-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of second PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the motion was successive and time-barred.
(9-0)

Stacy v. Stacy, 2023-CA-00219-COA (Civil – Domestic)
Reversing the chancellor’s division of martial property and alimony award, holding that the chancellor erred by failing to address both the Ferguson factors and the Armstrong factors in the decision.
(9-0)

Harris v. State, 2023-KA-00460-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming resentencing for conviction of depraved heart murder, holding that the trial court did not err in sentencing the defendant to life imprisonment and that the defendant had no liberty interest in parole.
(7-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only; Emfinger did not participate)

Alexander v. Metropolitan Y.M.C.A., 2022-CP-01092-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in a personal injury action arising from a swimming pool accident, holding that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment where there was no evidence of breach or proximate cause.
(7-0: McDonald and Emfinger did not participate)

Easterling v. State, 2023-KA-00610-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance as a second or subsequent offender and habitual offender, holding that there were no grounds for reversal after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(9-0)

LaFleur v. State, 2022-KA-00500-COA, consolidated with 2022-IA-01244-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss, holding that the trial court’s ruling granting a new trial on attempted murder did not constitute an acquittal so the Double Jeopardy Clause did not prohibit a second trial, and dismissing direct appeal because the defendant did not challenge his conviction of simple assault.

Pryer v. State, 2023-CP-00568-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of a Rule 60(b)(6) motion to reconsider the denial of a PCR motion challenging the revocation of a suspended sentence, holding that it was error to deny the motion reconsider because MDOC’s petition for revocation cited only technical violations.
(9-0)

Hardy v. State, 2023-CP-00970-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the guilty plea was voluntary, that any Fourth Amendment or Sixth Amendment challenges were waived by the guilty plea.
(9-0)

Wallace v. State, 2023-KA-00071-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of armed robbery, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error by proceeding with voir dire in the defendant’s absence where the defendant knew about the trial date but had transportation issues, that there was no reversible error related to the prosecutor’s statements during closing, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-1[0]-1[2]: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald.)

Siggers v. State, 2023-CP-00324-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the trial court’s summary denial of a pro se “Habeas Corpus” pleading that it treated as a PCR motion, holding that the trial court erred by treating the pleading as a PCR motion but affirming denial of the “Habeas Corpus” because the issue was moot once the final revocation hearing was held, but remanding the matter to consider a subsequent PCR motion.
(6-3: McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes and Westbrooks, joined in part by McCarty)

Other Orders

  • None

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 20, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There are several direct criminal appeals, a personal injury case, and two real property cases.

Allen v. State, 2023-KA-00264-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of armed robbery, kidnapping, and aggravated assault with firearm enhancement, holding that there were no issues warranting reversal after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(9-0)

Aldridge v. South Tippah County School District, 2023-CA-00418-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a high school in a personal injury case, holding that there was no evidence that the school breached any duty that proximately caused student’s injuries sustained in a locker room fight.
(6-3: McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Carlton dissented, joined by Westbrooks, and joined in part by McDonald)

Galang v. State, 2023-KA-00006-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding videos from past sexual activity between the defendant and the victim or and that excluding a defense witness’s testimony for which no proffer was made was at most harmless error.
(9-0)

Connor v. State, 2022-KA-01288-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-0)

Howell v. State, 2023-KM-00265-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor) consolidated with 2023-KM-00270 (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Affirming convictions of speeding and driving without a tag, holding that the evidence was sufficient and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in not accepting the defendant’s father as an expert in the field of radar technology.
(8-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Note – Here is the trial court’s voir dire of the defendant’s father:

Trevino v. State, 2022-KA-01292-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault and felon in possession of a weapon but reversing conviction of theft of a motor vehicle with a value of more than $5,000 and $25,000, holding that the State failed to offer any evidence of the stolen truck’s value (an error the State confessed) and rendering since the State did not argue for remand and resentencing for any lesser-included offense.
(9-0)

Brown v. State, 2023-KA-00299-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that section 97-37-5 does not violate the Second Amendment since the Mississippi Supreme Court has already said so.
(9-0)

Wiggs v. Boykin, 2023-CA-00496-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming order of partition and award of an equitable adjustment resulting from the partition, holding that the defendant waived his argument that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient deraignments by not filing a Rule 12(e) motion for a more definite statement, that the chancellor’s determination of the amount of owelty was supported by substantial credible evidence, and that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion for new trial.
(9-0)

Richardson v. Estate of Richardson, 2023-CA-00650-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s grant of summary judgment for the Estate in a petition to confirm title and expunging liens from the county’s records, holding that the court of appeals’ prior mandate did not create a debtor-creditor relationship between the decedent and the petitioner and that there is no evidence of an enrolled money judgment that would provide the basis for the liens on the decedent’s property.
(9-0)

Other Orders

  • Collins v. Collins, 2022-CA-00903-COA (denying rehearing)
  • McLellan v. McLellan, 2022-CA-01006-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Lee v. City of Pascagoula, 2022-CA-01190-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Suarez v. State, 2023-KA-00526-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 13, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. The court affirmed in two direct criminal appeals but reversed, dismissed, or vacated in each of the remaining cases. Those four consist of a divorce, a real property conveyance, a mechanic lien against real property, and a misdemeanor.

Osing v. Osing, 2022-CA-00755-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s judgment in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying the husband’s motion to withdraw consent to the irreconcilable-differences divorce, but reversing the chancellor’s division of the marital estate for failure to make sufficient factual findings and, as a result, reversed the chancellor’s award of alimony and a minor child’s college and health-insurance coverage pending reconsideration of the division of the marital estate.
(7-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Lawrence did not participate)

Campbell v. State, 2022-KA-01055-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of a dwelling, holding that there was sufficient evidence supporting the verdict and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not err by referencing the grand jury proceedings, that there was no Brady violation regarding lost fingerprints, and that the trial court did not err in overruling a Batson challenge.
(8-0: Smith did not participate)

Alexander v. Espinoza, 2023-CP-01139-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Dismissing the appeal of a chancellor’s order denying declaratory relief, holding that the chancellor’s order was not a final judgment because it did not resolve all claims against all parties, and it did not contain 54(b) certification language.
(9-0)

In the Matter of the Estate of Johnson: Manners v. Estate of Johnson, 2023-CA-00823-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts, & Estates)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision denying a claim to enforce rights under a document by which a decedent had intended to convey an interest in real property, holding that the document was a valid conveyance of an interest in the property and remanded for necessary parties to be joined and for further proceedings consistent with the opinions.
(9-0)

Carpenter v. State, 2023-KA-00580-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of child exploitation, holding that section 97-5-33(8) of Mississippi’s child exploitation statute is not unconstitutional for overbreadth or for supporting entrapment and holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence.
(9-0)

NOTE – Here is the court’s description of section Miss. Code Ann. § 97-5-33(8):

Holt v. State, 2023-KM-00121-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Vacating and remanding dismissal of an appeal to the circuit court from a conviction of simple domestic assault originating in municipal court, holding that the circuit court erred by dismissing the appeal for failure to file a brief without giving notice of the deficiency and an opportunity to cure and that the record was insufficient to determine whether the circuit court had jurisdiction for want of posting a cost bond.
(7-1-0: Carlton concurred in result only without writing; Smith did not participate)

  • Bradford v. State, 2022-KA-00493-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Hutson v. Hutson, 2022-CT-00569-COA (dismissing motion for appellate attorney’s fees)
  • Taylor v. Johnson, 2022-CA-00734-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Brown v. Black, 2022-CA-00869-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Roley v. Roley, 2022-CP-01104-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Winstead v. State, 2022-KA-01235-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Smith v. State, 2023-KA-00185-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Magyar v. Shiers, 2023-CA-00682-COA (denying motion to dismiss appeal)
  • Brown v. State, 2024-TS-00741-COA (granting motion to proceed out of time)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 23, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eleven opinions yesterday. There are several direct criminal appeal, a couple of wills and estates cases, a personal injury case dismissed for want of prosecution, and an insurance coverage case. There is also a handful of PCR cases including one denial that was reversed and another denial that was vacated because the judge was disqualified.

Brown v. State, 2023-KA-00082-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of three counts of touching a child for lustful purposes and four counts of sexual battery, holding that the trial court did abuse its discretion in excluding the defendant’s mothers testimony that the victim had asked about what the repercussions would be if she lied and holding, that the indictment was legally sufficient, that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, and that there was no plain error affecting the defendant’s substantial rights.
(6-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing.)

Wren v. Zellers, 2023-CA-00152-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for want of prosecution, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion where there was a clear record of delay over the course of four years.
(5-3-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Smith did not participate)

Gibson v. State, 2023-KA-00821-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance, holding that upon review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record that there were no issues that warranted reversal.
(9-0)

Grayson v. State, 2023-KA-00400-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey breif and the record that there were no arguable issues that required supplemental briefing and affirming the trial court.
(9-0)

Bradley v. State, 2023-CP-00763-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the motion as successive.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

In re the Estate of Warren, 2023-CA-00438-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision after bench trial in a will contest and contest over inter vivos transfers, holding that the chancellor did not commit clear error in finding no confidential relationship, finding no evidence of undue influence, and finding that the testator had the requisite mental competence and testamentary capacity when he made the inter vivos transfers and executed his will, and granting a motion to strike an exhibit in the record excerpts that was not included in the lower court record.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Clark v. Alfa Ins. Co., 2022-CA-01251-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of declaratory and summary judgment in favor of an insurer, holding that the agricultural enterprise exclusion in the homeowner’s policy at issue applied to the plaintiffs’ claim against the insured after the plaintiffs’ vehicle collided with the insured’s cattle.
(9-0)

Brown v. State, 2023-CP-00171-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion for PCR seeking to set aside a guilty plea, holding that the motion was time barred.
(9-0)

Norman v. State, 2023-CP-00296-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing denial of PCR motions, holding that the circuit court erred by not considering whether the motion was timely under the UPCCRA and remanding for that purpose.
(5-4: Emfinger dissented, joined by Carlton, Wilson, and Smith)

Price v. State, 2023-CA-00941-COA (Civil – PCR)
Vacating and remanding the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit judge who denied the PCR motion was disqualified because she was the district attorney when the petitioner entered his guilty plea.
(9-0)

In the Matter of the Estate of Staten, 2023-CP-00228-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancery court’s denial of a motion to set aside a prior denial of a prior request to reopen an estate, holding that the appellant had waived her right to appeal issues that had been previously litigated and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion denying motions to set aside/reconsider.
(8-0: Smith did not participate.)

Other Orders

  • Jordan v. State, 2022-CP-00874-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Frazier v. State, 2022-KA-00896-COA (dismissing untimely motion for rehearing)
  • The Avion Group, Inc. v. The City of Oxford, 2023-CA-00169-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Weaver v. State, 2024-TS-00438-COA (dismissing utimely appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 18, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. Five were direct appeals of felony convictions. The sixth opinion is a constructive trust case.

Longs v. State, 2022-KA-00750-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming bench trial convictions of manslaughter and simple assault, holding that the defendant had been properly questioned by the trial court about waiving her right to a jury trial and that her waiver was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.
(9-0: Smith did not participate.)

Williams v. Williams, 2023-CA-00360-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancery court’s dismissal of a petition for constructive trust regarding real property owned by the petitioner’s mother who allowed the petitioner to live there rent-free in exchange for assistance with repairs and upkeep, holding that the petitioner failed to prove a confidential relationship or, alternatively, an abuse of such a relationship and holding that the chancellor did not err in refusing to impose a constructive trust based on equity and good conscience.
(9-1-0: Barnes concurred in part and in the result without writing.)

Jackson v. State, 2023-KA-00224-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of shooting into a motor vehicle, holding that after a review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record, that there were no issues warranting reversal.
(10-0)

Baucom v. State, 2023-KA-00516-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of sexual battery and two counts of fondling, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions and, specifically, that the criminal conduct in this case was sufficiently near the charged time from to sustain the conviction.
(10-0)

Page v. State, 2023-KA-01078-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of rape, sexual battery, and burglary of a dwelling, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence of two prior bad acts to prove identity and explain how the defendant became a suspect where a limiting instruction was also given.
(10-0)

Black v. State, 2022-KA-01223-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of four types of drugs with intent to distribute, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the defendant’s statement to police or in allowing a witness to be recalled to testify to the defendant’s inculpatory statement, and holding that the evidence was sufficient to prove intent to distribute.
(8-2: McDonald dissented without writing; Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald.)

Other Orders

  • Wilbourn v. Wilbourn, 2018-CA-01653-COA (denying rehearing)
  • White v. White, 2022-CP-00823-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Toney v. State, 2023-CP-00151-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 11, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There are four divorce-related decisions, two direct criminal appeals, a tort case dismissed for failure to state a claim, a negligence case dismissed for want of prosecution, and a PCR case.

Roley v. Roley, 2022-CP-01104-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s rulings in a divorce action, holding that that the chancellor did not err in denying appellant’s Rule 60 motion that was filed after the mandate from the appeal of the case had been entered because the mandate rule barred reconsideration and that the chancellor did not err in finding the appellant in contempt or in incarcerating him for it.
(8-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Lawrence did not participate)

Clark v. State, 2023-KA-00011-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of simple possession of a controlled substance, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief, appellant’s pro se brief, and the record that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and that there were no other issues to warrant reversal.
(10-0)

Scott v. State, 2022-KA-00830-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of touching a child for lustful purposes, nine counts of sexual battery, and one count of exploitation of a child, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for change of venue because the motion to change venue was procedurally defective and lacked merit.
(9-0)

Ware v. Ware, 2023-CA-00605-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce action, holding that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion finding that the martial home was a marital asset, in distributing the marital home equally between the parties, or in not making specific findings of fact and conclusions of law as to each Ferguson factor.
(10-0)

Hasley v. Hasley, 2023-CA-00914-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s ruling that temporary orders of separate maintenance had been converted to a final order of support, holding that the order being appealed was entered while the case was previously on appeal and that the issue sub judice was encompassed in the Court of Appeals’ prior ruling and remanding for further proceedings.
(8-2-0: Barnes and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Archer v. Harlow’s Casino Resort & Spa, 2022-CP-01060-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of the pro se plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint after the initial complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to plead fraud with particularity, holding that the proposed amended complaint failed to state a claim for relief.
(10-0)

Pace v. Pace, 2022-CA-01259-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and vacating in part the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce matter related to the sale of a jointly owned commercial building, holding that the chancellor lacked jurisdiction to grant one party’s contempt motion but affirming the chancellor’s decision ordering that party to buy the other party’s interest in the property and denial of the Rule 59 motion.
(10-0)

Jiles v. State, 2023-CP-00383-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of several PCR motions, holding that they were time-barred and successive and that and no exceptions applied, and that the remaining arguments were waived because he pleaded or because he did not raise them in the circuit court.
(10-0)

Ware v. Brown, 2023-CA-00663-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal of a negligence action for want of prosecution, holding that there was a clear record of delay including two granted motions to compel and a two-year effort to obtain one plaintiff’s relevant medical history, that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the complaint with prejudice in lieu of lesser sanctions.
(5-1(2?)-3(2?): Wilson and Smith concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part; joined by McCarty and Smith; Westbrooks did not participate.)

Other Orders

  • Patrick v. Patrick, 2021-CA-00891-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Okorie v. Nat’l Ass’n Wells Fargo Bank, 2022-CP-00043-COA (denying pro se motion for reconsideration)
  • Marshall v. State, 2022-KA-00541-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Roley v. Roley, 2022-CP-01104-COA (denying motions for reconsideration and for recusal of four judges of the Court of Appeals)
  • Hartzog v. State, 2024-TS-00033-COA (denying pro se “motion to show cause” and dismissing appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 4, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. There is a paternity/child support case, a custody/termination of parental rights case, an MTCA personal injury case, a contract case, a slip-and-fall summary judgment, and three direct criminal appeals.

Myles v. Lewis, 2022-CA-01192-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings in a paternity action, holding that the chancellor erred in computing monthly child support by failing to account for the father’s significant income increase and personal withdrawals, inaccuracies in his financial statement, and admitted commingling of personal and business expenses; holding that the chancellor did not err in not requiring the father to pay half of the child’s private school tuition, insurance premiums, and extracurricular fees; and holding that no party was entitled attorney’s fees.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in result without writing)

Lemay v. City of Biloxi, 2023-CA-00469-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the City in an MTCA case stemming from a collision with a police officer, holding that although the trial court incorrectly ruled that the plaintiff was precluded from recovery because she was allegedly speeding, the summary judgment should affirmed because the undisputed evidence showed the officer was engaged in police protection activity and that he did not act with reckless disregard.
(7-2-0: Carlton and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence did not participate)

Hattie T. v. Matthew R., 2022-CP-00926-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s final judgment terminating parental rights, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying the mother’s motion to dismiss and that the chancellor’s decision terminating parental rights was supported by clear and convincing evidence and was in the best interests of the children.
(10-0)

Collins v. State, 2022-KA-01184-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of kidnapping, armed robbery, armed carjacking, aggravated assault, conspiracy to commit kidnapping, and conspiracy to commit armed robbery, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of other acts and crimes coupled with a limiting instruction, in excluding evidence of the defendant’s assault in prison by two witnesses, or in refusing the defendant’s instructions on lesser included instruction.
(7-2-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Terry v. State, 2022-KA-01194-COA, consolidated with Thomas v. State, 2022-KA-01278-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of two defendants (Terry and Thomas) for first-degree murder and drive-by shooting, holding that though the trial court abused its discretion in admitting surveillance video the error was harmless, that Terry’s conviction was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting text messages because they were not hearsay.
(10-0)

Designer Custom Homes, LLC v. U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies, LLC, 2023-CA-00207-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s reversal of the county court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a breach of contract case, holding that the circuit court erred by reversing on an issue and argument that were not raised in the county court or briefed on appeal and erred by finding that there was evidence in the record that presented a genuine issue of material fact.
(10-0)

Practice Point – Don’t rehash your trial court pleadings on appeal:

If the appeal process is daunting or simply pulling you away from other work you would rather do, your friendly neighborhood appellate attorney would love to visit with you about it.

Anderson v. SW Gaming LLC, 2023-CA-00345-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment for the defendant in a slip-and-fall case, holding that there was no evidence that the defendant caused water on the floor in the bathroom or that the defendant had either actual or constructive knowledge that there was water on the floor.
(10-0)

Harrera v. State, 2022-KA-01167-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of kidnapping, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, that the kidnapping instruction did not constructively amend the indictment (an issue that was procedurally barred and without merit), and that the trial court did not err by giving the State’s accomplice liability instruction.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00419-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Minor v. State, 2022-KA-00990-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 28, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. All are criminal law or criminal law adjacent, however there is one case discussing the form of the jury’s verdict that is more broadly applicable.

McDonald v. State, 2022-KA-01073-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Wilson v. State, 2023-CA-00070-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion for PCR, holding that the motion was untimely and that the petitioner failed to establish an exception to the time bar.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Lathan v. State, 2022-KA-00927-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming a juvenile’s conviction of second-degree murder and 40-year sentence, holding that the court did not err by accepting a verdict form that did not conform to the instructions but that nonetheless conveyed the jury’s intent in a reasonably clear manner and did not err in sentencing the juvenile because neither Jones nor Miller applied.
(10-0)

NOTE – Here is the Court’s explanation of the verdict form:

The Court also noted that the defendant did not object and that the jury was polled and that all agreed with the verdict.

PRACTICE POINT – This decision is worth reading for its succinct discussion on the form of the verdict issue. It packs a lot into two pages and may come in handy for your next big verdict form dispute.

Haley v. Brewer, 2023-SA-00571-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of an inmate’s suit protesting a facility transfer, holding that the inmate had no protected liberty interest in his housing assignment within MDOC.
(10-0)

Spralls v. State, 2023-KA-00347-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of an automobile, holding that a review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and an independent review of the record that there was no reversible error.
(10-0)

Turnage v. State, 2023-KA-00432-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress because there was substantial evidence that the police had probable cause to search his vehicle under the plain view exception or in finding the automobile exception allowed for a complete search of his truck.
(8-2-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Hunter v. State, 2022-CP-01269-COA (dismissing untimely pro se motion for rehearing)
  • Gleason v. State, 2023-CP-00357-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Anderson v. Grabmiller, 2023-CA-00593-COA (dismissing appellee’s motion to strike appellant’s reply brief as moot after appellee’s notice of withdrawal and denying appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees and expenses)
  • Wilson v. State, 2023-CP-01050-COA (denying State’s motion to dsimiss and denying pro se appellant’s motion to preclude the State from filing a responsive brief)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 21, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down a bounty of twelve opinions yesterday. I noticed a stray opinion from Thursday, May 9 so that is also summarized below. With a total of thirteen opinions, there is a lot of ground covered.

Martin v. State, 2023-KA-00044-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault and armed robbery after a trial in absentia, holding that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Tilley v. Gibbs, 2022-CA-01150-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment awarding physical custody of a child to the father, holding that the chancellor did not err in his Albright analysis and that substantial, credible evidence supported the custody determination.
(10-0)

Hamer v. State, 023-CP-00701-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of relief and dismissal of PCR motion without an evidentiary hearing, holding that the PCR motion lacked sufficient support to warrant a evidentiary hearing.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

McVay v. State, 2022-KA-00523-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of four counts of capital murder and one count of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error in admitting evidence of prior bad acts during cross-examination of the defendant and holding that the defendant’s trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective for failing to object.
(7-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Carlton did not participate)

Jackson v. State, 2022-KA-01143-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and burglary and sentence to life without eligibility for early release, probation, or parole, holding that the indictment was not fatally defective; that there was no plain error in denying a motion to suppress the defendant’s statements to law enforcement where the defendant made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of Miranda; that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s proposed insanity defense and imperfect self-defense instructions; and that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Wilson and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Practice Point – This is a handy citation to tuck away for one of those “I know its true by I can’t find a case that says so” situations:

Thompson v. State, 2023-CP-00218-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of the petitioner’s fourth and fifth PCR motions, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding them time-barred.
(10-0)

Smith v. West, 2023-CA-00297-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for failure to prosecute a personal injury case, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion after granting several continuances over nearly ten years since the action was commenced.
(10-0)

Signaigo v. Grinstead, 2022-CA-01212-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings in an adverse possession action, affirming the finding that the plaintiff could not prove the ownership element but reversing the finding that title was vested in the defendant as a matter of law because that issue was beyond the scope of the motion for summary judgment.
(8-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2022-CA-01175-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s findings in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in the equitable division of marital property, in determining the amount of child support, in determining the amount of alimony, or in denying the mother’s request for attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Carr v. State, 2022-KA-00491-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the State did not commit prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments such that the court was required to intervene on its own initiative.
(10-0)

Pickens v. State, 2022-KA-00822-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of meth while in possession of a firearm, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and independently reviewing the record that there were no errors warranting reversal.
(10-0)

Hearn v. State, 2023-CP-00275-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding the motion time-barred and that no statutory exceptions applied.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

From May 9, 2024

Daniels v. State, 2022-KA-00705-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after the the defendant was convicted of one count of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, three counts of aggravated assault, and one count of shooting into an occupied dwelling, holding that indictment’s error as to the count for murder was harmless so the conviction of the lesser-included offense of manslaughter was affirmed but holding that the indictment was legally insufficient as to aggravated assault counts and that the error was compounded by repetition in jury instructions and the State’s closing arguments.
4-1*-5: Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald, Lawrence and Smith (each of whom also joined the lead opinion); Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes, Carlton, Wilson, and McCarty.)

Other Orders

  • Arnold v. State, 2021-KA-01426-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Rutland v. Regions Bank, 2022-CA-00720-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Malone v. State, 2022-CP-00958-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Boyett v. Cain, 2022-CP-00978-COA (denying rehearing)
  • EEECHO Inc. v. Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, 2022-SA-01068-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Boyette v. State, 2022-CP-01239-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 14, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions this week. There is a domestic/separate maintenance decision, a third-party assault tort case, a direct appeal of a felony conviction, and two PCR cases.

Hasley v. Hasley, 2022-CA-00908-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s decision in a separate maintenance action, holding that there was no abuse of discretion in denying the husband’s motion to dismiss the complaint but that the chancellor erred by converting the temporary orders of spousal support to a final order.
(10-0)

White v. State, 2023-CP-00200-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the circuit court’s revocation of release, holding that because the circuit judge had been the assistant DA who had prosecuted the petitioner the judge was disqualified from presiding over the revocation hearing and that this error was not harmless.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Mack v. Merimac Apartments, 2022-CA-00897-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming summary judgment in a third-party assault case against an apartment complex, holding that evidence of some crime occurring on and near the subject property was sufficient summary judgment evidence on the element of proximate cause.
(6-3-1: Barnes and Wilson concurred in part and in the judgment without writing; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Galarza v. State, 022-KA-01066-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in admitting character evidence of the defendant’s prior convictions for manslaughter.
(7-3-0: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; McCarty concurred in the result only without separate written opinion.)

Smith v. State, 023-CP-00538-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that the petitioner’s claims were procedurally barred and that there was no merit to the petitioner’s arguments that he was entitled to a bifurcated hearing at sentencing and that there was insufficient proof of his prior convictions to warrant his sentencing as a habitual offender.
(10-0)

Other Orders

  • Kuebler v. State, 2020-KA-00027-COA (remanding sua sponte for correction of the record)
  • Okorie v. National Association Wells Fargo Bank, 2022-CP-00043-COA (denying appellant’s pro se “motion to reopen case based on fraudulent settlement agreement”)
  • Moore v. State, 2022-KA-00327-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Edwards v. State, 2022-KA-00719-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Smith v. State, 2022-KA-00852-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Saddler v. State, 2024-TS-00099-COA (sua sponte allowing appeal to proceed)

Hand Down Page