Mississippi Supreme Court – Page 16 – Mississippi Appeals Blog

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions today: one civil procedure decision on interlocutory appeal, one MDES decision, and two decisions affirming criminal convictions.

University of Mississippi Medical Center v. Jensen, 2020-IA-872-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury/Statute of Limitations/Service of Process)
Reversing, on interlocutory appeal, the county court’s ruling granting the plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to serve process, holding that the plaintiff did not show good cause where the plaintiff attempted to serve process on an administrative assistant, who accepted service on behalf of UMMC’s CEO, instead of the attorney general. Because the statute of limitations had expired, judgment was rendered in favor of UMMC.

“As neither inadvertence, mistake of counsel, or ignorance of the rules suffice to establish good cause, the county court lacked substantial evidence to support its finding that Jensen had shown good cause for an extension of time to serve process under Rule 4(h).”
Univ. of Miss. Med. Ctr v. Jensen, 2020-IA-827-SCT (Miss. 2022) (citation omitted).

Mississippi Department of Employment Security v. Dover Trucking, LLC, 2020-CC-1267-SCT (Civil – State Boards and Agency/Employment)
Reversing the circuit court’s order that reversed the MDES Board of Review’s decision that the claimant was an “employee” of a trucking company, holding that that the agency’s decision was supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary or capricious.

Williams v. State, 2020-KA-772-SCT (Criminal – Felony/Rebuttal Evidence)
Affirming conviction of one count of sexual battery, holding that the circuit court did not err in admitting State’s rebuttal evidence related to the defendant’s ankle monitor that had not been disclosed prior to trial because that evidence was not within the State’s due diligence/disclosure obligations prior to trial based on the defendant’s pre-trial representations. The supreme court also held that the circuit court did not err in excluding evidence that the minor victim had previously twerked on the school bus and that the defendant’s sufficiency of the evidence claim was meritless.

Williams v. State, 2019-CT-1007-SCT (en banc) (Criminal – Felony/Accomplice Liability)
Affirming, on writ of certiorari, convictions for two counts of conspiracy and two counts of possession with intent to distribute, holding that the evidence was sufficient to convict on accomplice liability rather than constructive possession where an inmate was directing a drug-trafficking ring from prison over the phone and whose home was found to have large amounts of cocaine and marijuana, as well as $93,259 in cash.

Other Orders

Ward v. Cranford, 2020-CT-410-SCT (denying petition for writ of certiorari)
Brown v. State, 2020-M-630 (denying petition for leave to proceed in trial court and for permission to file successive petition for post-conviction collateral relief)
State v. Corrothers, 2021-IA-836-SCT (denying motion for rehearing)
Cooper v. State, 2021-CT-1012-SCT (dismissing pro se “writ of certiorari”)

Hand Down List for February 24, 2022

Brown v. State, 2020-KA-1366-SCT (Criminal – Felony/Constructive Possession Instruction)
Affirming a conviction for three counts of possession of a controlled substance and one count of unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon with a sentence of twenty-four years to under the habitual offender statute, holding that the circuit court did not err in granting the State’s jury instruction on constructive possession or in denying the defendant’s proposed instruction on circumstantial evidence.

Copes v. State, 2019-CT-302-SCT (en banc) (Criminal – Felony/Right to Counsel of Choice)
Affirming a conviction for two counts of sexual battery of two minors and a sentence of twenty years, holding that the defendant was not denied his right to his counsel of choice under the Sixth Amendment when his lead counsel was removed during trial from questioning witnesses and making closing arguments due to repeated misconduct including violation of the judge’s orders.

Augustine v. State, 2019-CT-1467-SCT (en banc) (Criminal-Felony/Impeachment Testimony)
Reversing the court of appeals and reinstating/affirming a conviction for second-degree murder, holding that the circuit court did not err by allowing an officer to testify to the content of a prior witness’s statement for impeachment purposes and, assuming arguendo that it was error, that the overwhelming weight of the evidence supported the conviction.

Alexander v. State, 2019-CT-1612-SCT (en banc) (Criminal-Felony/Habitual Offender Status/Miller Hearing)
Reversing the court of appeals and reinstating/affirming a 1998 conviction for capital murder and sentence to life without parole, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the defendant’s motion to fund a mitigation expert and holding that the defendant was not deprived of his right to have a jury impose his sentence.

Other Orders
1 Denial of a “Motion for Review by Supreme Court of Court of Appeals’ Denial of Attorney’s Fees”
1 Denial of a Cert Petition
1 Denial of a Motion for Rehearing

Complete Hand Down List

BONUS CONTENT

Every so often, one needs to find support for a proposition that is so obvious that a citation is elusive. See generally Orin S. Kerr, A Theory of Law, 16 Green Bag 2d 111 (2012). The supreme court gifted the bar with this pithy statement that will come in handy in the future:

"It is axiomatic that a judge's rulings during trial are to be followed." Copes v. State, No. 2019-CT-00302-SCT (¶ 11) (Miss. 2022)

About

Mississippi Appeals Blog is written by Madison Taylor. I primarily post summaries of decisions from the Mississippi Supreme Court and the Mississippi Court of Appeals and some content on appellate and trial practice in Mississippi and legal miscellany. I am not affiliated with any court.

I am a shareholder at Wilkins Patterson where I have a litigation and workers’ comp practice and lead the firm’s appellate practice. I am licensed in Mississippi, Tennessee, and North Carolina and admitted to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Circuits.

If I can assist you on an appeal or other legal matter please reach out. You can find my contact information on my firm page.

Some Representative Appeals I have handled:

Estate of Pace: Pace v. Phillips, No. 2025-CA-00223-COA (Miss. Ct. App. July 28, 2026). I represented the appellant and obtained a reversal of the chancellor’s decision canceling a probated claim.
Smith v. Dennis Wright & Son Plumbing, No. 2025-WC-00046-COA (Miss. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2026). I represented the appellee and secured the affirmance of a decision of the Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Commission.
Unruh v. Johnson, 404 So. 3d 1166 (Miss. 2025). I represented the appellant on interlocutory appeal and won reversal and rendered judgment.
Am. Comp. Ins. Co. v. Ruiz, 389 So. 3d 1060 (Miss. 2024). I represented the potential statutory-employer in a declaratory action filed by a subcontractor’s carrier who sought to void workers’ compensation coverage ab initio after a catastrophic injury. We won summary judgment in federal district court based on a novel theory that the common law remedy of voiding a policy ab initio for material misrepresentation was not available to workers’ compensation policies in Mississippi. On appeal, the Fifth Circuit certified that legal question to the Mississippi Supreme Court. The Mississippi Supreme Court ordered briefing and then held that our theory was correct. The Fifth Circuit took that holding and affirmed the district court’s judgment in our favor.
Joe McGee Constr. Co. v. Brown-Bowens, 368 So. 3d 1277 (Miss. 2023). I represented a road construction contractor in a wrongful death lawsuit stemming from a one-car accident on a closed road. We persuaded the Mississippi Supreme Court to grant an interlocutory appeal and then to reverse the denial of summary judgment for our client.
Haynes v. Beckward, 358 So. 3d 1080 (Miss. Ct. App. 2023). After a jury verdict in the plaintiff’s favor in an auto-negligence action, I handled the appeal and won a remittitur based on insufficient expert testimony.
Estate of Ellis v. MMC Materials, Inc., 311 So. 3d 691 (Miss. Ct. App. 2021). I represented the defendant company in a personal injury case. We won summary judgment at the trial court and then secured that victory with an affirmance on appeal.

Tag: Mississippi Supreme Court

Summaries of the Mississippi Supreme Court opinions of February 24, 2022

Mississippi Supreme Court Hand Downs for February 10, 2022