Tag: PCR

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of August 22, 2024; August 29, 2024; September 5, 2024 and September 12, 2024

I have fallen behind on my summaries. Fortunately for me, this has not been a particularly prolific stretch for the Mississippi Supreme Court. Summaries from the last four weeks are below.

August 22, 2024

No Opinions

August 29, 2024

Chatman v. State, 2023-KA-00583-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of two counts of sexual battery, holding that there was uncertainty as to the unanimity of the jury’s verdict as to the sexual-battery counts but that there was no such uncertainty as to the lesser-included offense of gratification of lust for each count, and remanded for new trial on sexual-battery charges or resentencing on the lesser-included counts.
(8-0: Randolph did not participate)

McClain v. State, 2023-KA-01189-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a convicted felony, holding that there were no issues warranting reversal based on review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(9-0)

September 5, 2024

Johnson v. State, 2023-CA-00117-SCT (Criminal – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s decision that the defendant should remain parole ineligible after Miller hearing, holding the defendant was not entitled to jury sentencing under section 97-3-21(2) because he was convicted before July 1, 2024, and that the application of the parole-ineligibility statute to the defendant’s life sentence was not unconstitutional.
(6-3-0: Coleman concurred in part and in the result, joined by Kitchens and King)

September 12, 2024

Archie v. Smith, 2023-EC-01149-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Vacating judgment on petition for judicial review of an election contest, holding that the circuit court did not consider sufficient evidence to determine whether the circuit clerk’s office was open or closed on the due date which, in turn, determined whether the petition was timely.
(8-0: Kitchens did not participate)

Fluker v. State, 2022-CT-00692-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of conspiracy to commit aggravated assault, holding that the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s request to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of conspiracy to commit simple assault.
(8-0: Randolph did not participate)

Other Orders

August 22, 2024

  • Patrick v. Patrick, 2021-CT-00891-SCT (denying cert)
  • MDHS v. Johnson, 2022-CT-00605-SCT (granting cert)
  • Thoden v. Hallford, 2022-CA-00835-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Smith v. State, 2022-CT_00852-SCT (denying cert)
  • Boyett v. State, 2022-CT-01239-SCT (denying cert)
  • McNinch v. Brandon Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C., 2023-CA-00050-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Gleason v. State, 2023-CT-00357-SCT (denying cert)
  • Pryer v. State, 2023-M-01230-SCT (denying motion to reconsider)

August 29, 2024

  • Ronk v. State, 2021-DR-00269-SCT (denying motion to stay mandate pending cert)
  • Arnold v. State, 2021-CT-01426 (denying cert)
  • Rutland v. Regions Bank, 2022-CT-00720 (denying cert)
  • Malone v. State, 2022-CT-00958-SCT (denying cert)
  • Minor v. State, 2022-CT-00990-SCT (granting cert)
  • The Mississippi Bar v. Rogers, 2024-BD-00215-SCT (granting the Bar’s motion for reimbursement of costs and expenses)

September 5, 2024

  • Wilson v. State, 2017-M-00230 (denying pro se application for leave to proceed in the trial court, finding the filing frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings may result in sanctions)
  • Cage v. State, 2017-M-01498 (denying pro se application for leave to proceed in the trial court, finding the filing frivolous, and warning that future frivolous filings may result in sanctions)
  • Clarksdale Public Utilities Commission v. Mississippi Department of Employment Security, 2022-CT-01085-SCT (denying cert petition as untimely)

September 12, 2024

  • Marshall v. State, 2022-CT-00541-SCT (denying cert)
  • M.H. v. L.R., 2022-CA-00922-SCT (denying motion to substitute, motion to expedite consideration, and motion to dismiss the appeal as moot, and vacating judgment terminating parental rights)

Hand Down Page – August 22, 2024

Hand Down Page – August 29, 2024

Hand Down Page – September 5, 2024

Hand Down Page – September 12, 2024

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 3, 2024 and September 10, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions last week and three opinions this week. Since I was out of the office last Tuesday I included last week’s cases in this post. Between the two dates there there are a couple of service-of-process cases, a few personal injury cases, a couple of domestic relations cases, direct criminal appeals, and a two PCR cases. Appellants prevailed in all three of today’s cases.

September 3, 2024

Havard v. Hart, 2023-CA-00260-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for insufficient service of process, holding that there was substantial evidence supporting the trial court’s finding that the defendant had not been properly served and that the plaintiff did not have good cause for failing to timely serve process.
(8-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Old Hattiesburg High, L.P. v. Harris Construction Services, LLC, 2023-CA-00579-COA (Civil – Other)
Dismissing appeal of order denying a motion to reinstate an order obtaining expunging a contractor’s lien, holding that the initial order expunging the lien was not a final appealable order and that subsequent orders on motions revising the interim order were not final either.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Hyland v. State, 2023-CA-00256-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of PCR motion challenging his convictions and seeking an out-of-time appeal, holding that motion was time-barred and successive.
(9-0)

Fortner v. Bratcher, 2023-CP-00664-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s findings related to motions for contempt and custody modification, holding that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion finding the father in contempt, carrying forward the parties’ agreed visitation schedule, or enjoining the parties from contacting CPS with allegations of neglect or abuse without first contacting local law enforcement.
(9-0)

Miller v. State, 2023-CP-00812-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that it was barred by the UPCCRA’s statute of limitations.
(9-0)

Wilkerson v. Allred, 2023-CA-00393-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing claims for emotional distress damage after the defendant shot and killed the plaintiff’s puppy in the head as it sat next to the plaintiff’s twelve-year-old sister, holding that there was a jury question on the issue of whether the plaintiff’s emotional distress injuries were reasonably foreseeable to the defendant.
(4-3-2: Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing; Carlson dissented, joined by Emfinger and joined in part by McDonald.)

September 10, 2024

Bell v. State, 2023-CA-00951-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Vacating and remanding revocation of a suspended sentence, holding that the trial judge was automatically disqualified because she had previously served as the ADA for the underlying conviction.
(7-2: Barnes dissented, joined by Wilson)

Wells v. Wells, 2023-CA-00674-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancery court’s judgment granting the wife’s petition for divorce and divesting the husband of his interest in real property, holding that there was no evidence that the husband was properly served.
(4-1-4: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes, Lawrence and Smith.)

Deere v. Taylor, 2023-CA-00063-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing the trial court’s dismissal of a personal injury lawsuit, holding that the prohibition against claim-splitting was not triggered where the plaintiff filed one lawsuit but was unable to serve the defendants and months later filed a second lawsuit asserting the same causes of action against the same parties while the first lawsuit sat stale.

Other Orders

  • Daly v. Raines, 2022-CT-00600-SCT (denying appellant’s to voluntarily dismiss this appeal)
  • McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2022-CA-01175-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Estate of Staten: Staten v. Pedersen, 2023-CA-00228-COA (denying untimely motion tor additional time to file a motion for rehearing)
  • Stewart v. State, 2024-TS-00606-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)

September 3, 2024 Hand Down Page

September 10, 2024 Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 27, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eleven opinions today. The majority are PCR cases, but there are a few direct criminal appeals, a personal injury case, and a divorce case.

Magee v. State, 2023-CP-00008-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err by failing to appoint counsel to represent the petitioner at his evidentiary hearing, finding that the guilty pleas were knowing/intelligent/voluntary, or in denying the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.
(9-0)

Haley v. State, 2023-CP-00918-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of second PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the motion was successive and time-barred.
(9-0)

Stacy v. Stacy, 2023-CA-00219-COA (Civil – Domestic)
Reversing the chancellor’s division of martial property and alimony award, holding that the chancellor erred by failing to address both the Ferguson factors and the Armstrong factors in the decision.
(9-0)

Harris v. State, 2023-KA-00460-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming resentencing for conviction of depraved heart murder, holding that the trial court did not err in sentencing the defendant to life imprisonment and that the defendant had no liberty interest in parole.
(7-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only; Emfinger did not participate)

Alexander v. Metropolitan Y.M.C.A., 2022-CP-01092-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in a personal injury action arising from a swimming pool accident, holding that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment where there was no evidence of breach or proximate cause.
(7-0: McDonald and Emfinger did not participate)

Easterling v. State, 2023-KA-00610-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance as a second or subsequent offender and habitual offender, holding that there were no grounds for reversal after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(9-0)

LaFleur v. State, 2022-KA-00500-COA, consolidated with 2022-IA-01244-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss, holding that the trial court’s ruling granting a new trial on attempted murder did not constitute an acquittal so the Double Jeopardy Clause did not prohibit a second trial, and dismissing direct appeal because the defendant did not challenge his conviction of simple assault.

Pryer v. State, 2023-CP-00568-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of a Rule 60(b)(6) motion to reconsider the denial of a PCR motion challenging the revocation of a suspended sentence, holding that it was error to deny the motion reconsider because MDOC’s petition for revocation cited only technical violations.
(9-0)

Hardy v. State, 2023-CP-00970-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the guilty plea was voluntary, that any Fourth Amendment or Sixth Amendment challenges were waived by the guilty plea.
(9-0)

Wallace v. State, 2023-KA-00071-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of armed robbery, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error by proceeding with voir dire in the defendant’s absence where the defendant knew about the trial date but had transportation issues, that there was no reversible error related to the prosecutor’s statements during closing, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-1[0]-1[2]: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald.)

Siggers v. State, 2023-CP-00324-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the trial court’s summary denial of a pro se “Habeas Corpus” pleading that it treated as a PCR motion, holding that the trial court erred by treating the pleading as a PCR motion but affirming denial of the “Habeas Corpus” because the issue was moot once the final revocation hearing was held, but remanding the matter to consider a subsequent PCR motion.
(6-3: McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes and Westbrooks, joined in part by McCarty)

Other Orders

  • None

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of August 15, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions today. There is one direct criminal appeal, one wrongful termination case, an adoption, and a pro se PCR win.

Bradford v. State, 2023-KA-00595-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of armed robbery, finding no error after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(9-0)

Public Service Commission of Yazoo City v. Wright, 2023-IA-00020-SCT (Civil – State Boards and Prisons)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of the PSC’s motion for summary judgment in a suit alleging wrongful termination in retaliation for refusing to participate in an illegal activity, holding on interlocutory appeal that the plaintiff failed to identify any act on the part of her supervisor that warranted the imposition of criminal penalties.
(9-0)

In the Matter of the Adoption of D.A.S., a Minor: B.B. v. K.P., 2023-CA-00381-SCT (Civil – Adoption)
Affirming denial of a petition to set aside an adoption based on alleged fraudulent misrepresentations that the adoption would be “open,” holding that the petition was untimely because it was filed more than six months after the entry of the adoption decree.
(9-0)

Practice Point – Though the petition to set aside the adoption was dismissed as untimely, it was interesting that an issue in the case was notary lines that were inconsistent with the body of the adoption petition. The petitioner was seeking to have the adoption set aside based on claims of fraudulent misrepresentations that the adoption would be “open.” The body of the initial and amended petitions for adoption did not reference an “open” adoption, but the notary lines read:


A good reminder to beware of those copy-paste portions of pleadings.

Love v. State, 2021-CT-01101-SCT (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the circuit court for dismissing the petitioner’s voluntariness claim without evidentiary hearing and the Court of Appeals for affirming that dismissal, holding that the circuit court committed plain error during the plea colloquy by incorrectly stating the minimum penalty on each count to which the petitioner was pleading, that the the petitioner was not properly informed he would be sentenced as a habitual offender resulting in a blatant injustice, that the State did not establish a factual basis to support the habitual offender portion of the indictment by failing to mention the prior felony convictions, and that issues related to the petitioner’s request to withdraw his plea and his ineffective assistance claim were procedurally barred.
(9-0)

Other Orders

  • Hills v. Manns, 2022-CT-00774-SCT (denying cert)
  • Boyett v. Cain, 2022-CT-00978-SCT (granting pro se cert petition)
  • Jones v. Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services, 2022-SA-01234-SCT (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 6, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. Four are direct criminal appeals, one is an attorney’s fees dispute in a property-line encroachment case, and the other is a PCR case.

Perkins v. State, 2023-KA-00874-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of felon in possession of a firearm, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the overwhelming weight of it and that the trial court did not abuse it discretion in admitting the defendant’s unredacted prior felony conviction, in denying a motion for mistrial based on a statement heard on bodycam video during the portion of that video that the State had agreed to mute, or in limiting the defendant’s cross-exam regarding police department policies.
(7-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only; McDonald dissented without writing)

Corr Properties, LLC v. Proctor, 2023-CA-00782-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s award of attorney’s fees after resolving a property-line encroachment dispute, holding that the chancellor did not err in granting one party’s request and denying the other party’s request where the chancellor made specific findings and his decision was supported by substantial evidence in the record.
(9-0)

Johnson v. State, 2022-KA-00665-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of murder, holding that the trial court did not err by not objecting sua sponte to improper remarks by the State during closing argument that the defendant did not object to, that the defendant’s right to a speedy trial was not violated, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a map, in admitting a thumbdrive with materials from the defendant’s Facebook page, that the lack of error precluded reversal based on cumulative error, and that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the overwhelming weight of it, and declining to address ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal.
(9-0)

Carroll v. State, 2023-CP-00688-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that the indictment for burglary of a dwelling was not defective for listing the incorrect owner of said dwelling.
(9-0)

Alexander v. State, 2022-KA-00977-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of touching of a child for lustful purposes, holding that the State made improper “golden rule” arguments during closing but that it was harmless in the context of the evidence supporting the conviction, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion denying the defendant’s for-cause challenge to a juror, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s simple assault instruction, and that the single harmless error regarding golden-rule arguments did not amount to cumulative error.
(4-4-0: Barnes, Wilson, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence concurred in result only without writing; Smith did not participate)

Simmons v. State, 2023-KA-00130-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder for killing someone during the commission of a burglary, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, the trial court did not err by admitting gruesome autopsy photos, and the trial court did not err by refusing the defendant’s proposed reasonable-doubt instructions.
(7-2: McDonald dissented without writing; Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald)

Other Orders

  • Weaver v. Ross, 2022-CA-00426-COA (denying rehearing)
  • The City of Pascagoula v. Cumbest, 2022-CA-00745-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Nettles v. Nettles, 2023-CA-00041-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of July 25, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down just one opinion today in a direct criminal appeal. Since I had a 1:30 p.m. hearing today, I welcome the reprieve from volume.

Sheely v. State, 2023-KA-00493-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of more than 0.1 gram but less than 2 grams of meth, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s proposed broken chain of custody instruction because the defendant did not overcome the presumption of regularity.
(9-0)

Other Orders

  • Hutto v. State, 2017-DR-01207-SCT (denying motion for leave to file successive petition for PCR)
  • Harper v. State, 2022-CT-00659-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 23, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eleven opinions yesterday. There are several direct criminal appeal, a couple of wills and estates cases, a personal injury case dismissed for want of prosecution, and an insurance coverage case. There is also a handful of PCR cases including one denial that was reversed and another denial that was vacated because the judge was disqualified.

Brown v. State, 2023-KA-00082-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of three counts of touching a child for lustful purposes and four counts of sexual battery, holding that the trial court did abuse its discretion in excluding the defendant’s mothers testimony that the victim had asked about what the repercussions would be if she lied and holding, that the indictment was legally sufficient, that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, and that there was no plain error affecting the defendant’s substantial rights.
(6-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing.)

Wren v. Zellers, 2023-CA-00152-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for want of prosecution, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion where there was a clear record of delay over the course of four years.
(5-3-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Smith did not participate)

Gibson v. State, 2023-KA-00821-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance, holding that upon review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record that there were no issues that warranted reversal.
(9-0)

Grayson v. State, 2023-KA-00400-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey breif and the record that there were no arguable issues that required supplemental briefing and affirming the trial court.
(9-0)

Bradley v. State, 2023-CP-00763-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the motion as successive.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

In re the Estate of Warren, 2023-CA-00438-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision after bench trial in a will contest and contest over inter vivos transfers, holding that the chancellor did not commit clear error in finding no confidential relationship, finding no evidence of undue influence, and finding that the testator had the requisite mental competence and testamentary capacity when he made the inter vivos transfers and executed his will, and granting a motion to strike an exhibit in the record excerpts that was not included in the lower court record.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Clark v. Alfa Ins. Co., 2022-CA-01251-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of declaratory and summary judgment in favor of an insurer, holding that the agricultural enterprise exclusion in the homeowner’s policy at issue applied to the plaintiffs’ claim against the insured after the plaintiffs’ vehicle collided with the insured’s cattle.
(9-0)

Brown v. State, 2023-CP-00171-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion for PCR seeking to set aside a guilty plea, holding that the motion was time barred.
(9-0)

Norman v. State, 2023-CP-00296-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing denial of PCR motions, holding that the circuit court erred by not considering whether the motion was timely under the UPCCRA and remanding for that purpose.
(5-4: Emfinger dissented, joined by Carlton, Wilson, and Smith)

Price v. State, 2023-CA-00941-COA (Civil – PCR)
Vacating and remanding the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit judge who denied the PCR motion was disqualified because she was the district attorney when the petitioner entered his guilty plea.
(9-0)

In the Matter of the Estate of Staten, 2023-CP-00228-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancery court’s denial of a motion to set aside a prior denial of a prior request to reopen an estate, holding that the appellant had waived her right to appeal issues that had been previously litigated and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion denying motions to set aside/reconsider.
(8-0: Smith did not participate.)

Other Orders

  • Jordan v. State, 2022-CP-00874-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Frazier v. State, 2022-KA-00896-COA (dismissing untimely motion for rehearing)
  • The Avion Group, Inc. v. The City of Oxford, 2023-CA-00169-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Weaver v. State, 2024-TS-00438-COA (dismissing utimely appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 16, 2024

The annual July hiatus is over and the Mississippi Court of Appeals is back today with nine opinions. There are four direct criminal appeals, including one reversal of a murder conviction. There are three real property cases, one involving a partition, one an administrative condemnation decision, and the other a landowner’s right to keep horses on her property within city limits. There is also a custody modification decision and a PCR decision. (If you notice a missing tenth judge on these cases, Judge Greenlee’s retirement from the court was effective July 1, 2024.)

JDB Rentals, LLC v. City of Verona, 2023-CA-00431-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision affirming the board of aldermen decision administratively condemning three of rental properties, holding that the exclusionary rule prohibited consideration of evidence the code-enforcement officer obtained incident to an unconstitutional search of property.
(8-1-0: Carlton concurred in result only without writing)

Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00636-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and shooting into a motor vehicle, holding that the trial court did not err by not striking four potential jurors because none of the four was seated on the jury.
(8-1-0: McDonald concurred in the result only without writing)

Shanks v. State, 2023-CP-00271-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion seeking relief from a 2003 guilty plea, holding that the claims were not subject to any exception and did not involved the parole board.
(9-0)

Wade v. Simmons Erosion Control, Inc., 2023-CA-00733-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision dividing a large tract of land between two landowners, holding that the chancellor did not commit manifest error by accepting and approving a special master’s report and choosing one of the partition options presented by the special master.
(9-0)

Sinquefield v. The City of Ridgeland, 2022-CA-01276-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision that affirmed the City’s unanimous (no nays) decision that a landowner lacked the requisite acreage to maintain two horses on her property, holding that the City had to be reined in because its interpretation of the ordinance was not based on substantial evidence and was arbitrary and capricious where the owner had ponied up and acquired possessory interest in adjacent tracts.
(6-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without trotting out a written opinion; Barnes and Emfinger did not participate)

Herrington v. State, 2022-KA-00691-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record that there were no issues that warranted reversal.
(8-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Littleton v. State, 2023-KA-00239-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing the conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the circuit court erred in admitting a recorded statement of a witness where the witness was not called giving the defendant no opportunity to cross-examine the witness in violation of the Confrontation Clause, that the admission of the statement was not harmless error, and that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to give the proposed defense instruction stating the jury’s duty to acquit should it find that the defendant acted in necessary self-defense.
(6-3-0: Lawrence and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in result only without writing)

NOTE – Here is a summary of the court’s holding that the admission of the statement was error from paragraph 42 of the opinion:

Wells v. State, 2022-KA-00707-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of conspiracy to commit murder and first-degree murder, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-0)

May v. Brown, 2023-CA-00624-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s child-custody modification order, holding that substantial evidence supported the modification giving the father primary care, control, and custody of the minor.
(8-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Estate of Green v. Michini, 2022-CA-00365-COA (denying motions for rehearing)
  • Rambo v. Kelly Natural Gas Pipelines, LLC, 2023-WC-00402-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 11, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There are four divorce-related decisions, two direct criminal appeals, a tort case dismissed for failure to state a claim, a negligence case dismissed for want of prosecution, and a PCR case.

Roley v. Roley, 2022-CP-01104-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s rulings in a divorce action, holding that that the chancellor did not err in denying appellant’s Rule 60 motion that was filed after the mandate from the appeal of the case had been entered because the mandate rule barred reconsideration and that the chancellor did not err in finding the appellant in contempt or in incarcerating him for it.
(8-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Lawrence did not participate)

Clark v. State, 2023-KA-00011-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of simple possession of a controlled substance, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief, appellant’s pro se brief, and the record that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and that there were no other issues to warrant reversal.
(10-0)

Scott v. State, 2022-KA-00830-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of touching a child for lustful purposes, nine counts of sexual battery, and one count of exploitation of a child, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for change of venue because the motion to change venue was procedurally defective and lacked merit.
(9-0)

Ware v. Ware, 2023-CA-00605-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce action, holding that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion finding that the martial home was a marital asset, in distributing the marital home equally between the parties, or in not making specific findings of fact and conclusions of law as to each Ferguson factor.
(10-0)

Hasley v. Hasley, 2023-CA-00914-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s ruling that temporary orders of separate maintenance had been converted to a final order of support, holding that the order being appealed was entered while the case was previously on appeal and that the issue sub judice was encompassed in the Court of Appeals’ prior ruling and remanding for further proceedings.
(8-2-0: Barnes and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Archer v. Harlow’s Casino Resort & Spa, 2022-CP-01060-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of the pro se plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint after the initial complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to plead fraud with particularity, holding that the proposed amended complaint failed to state a claim for relief.
(10-0)

Pace v. Pace, 2022-CA-01259-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and vacating in part the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce matter related to the sale of a jointly owned commercial building, holding that the chancellor lacked jurisdiction to grant one party’s contempt motion but affirming the chancellor’s decision ordering that party to buy the other party’s interest in the property and denial of the Rule 59 motion.
(10-0)

Jiles v. State, 2023-CP-00383-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of several PCR motions, holding that they were time-barred and successive and that and no exceptions applied, and that the remaining arguments were waived because he pleaded or because he did not raise them in the circuit court.
(10-0)

Ware v. Brown, 2023-CA-00663-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal of a negligence action for want of prosecution, holding that there was a clear record of delay including two granted motions to compel and a two-year effort to obtain one plaintiff’s relevant medical history, that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the complaint with prejudice in lieu of lesser sanctions.
(5-1(2?)-3(2?): Wilson and Smith concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part; joined by McCarty and Smith; Westbrooks did not participate.)

Other Orders

  • Patrick v. Patrick, 2021-CA-00891-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Okorie v. Nat’l Ass’n Wells Fargo Bank, 2022-CP-00043-COA (denying pro se motion for reconsideration)
  • Marshall v. State, 2022-KA-00541-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Roley v. Roley, 2022-CP-01104-COA (denying motions for reconsideration and for recusal of four judges of the Court of Appeals)
  • Hartzog v. State, 2024-TS-00033-COA (denying pro se “motion to show cause” and dismissing appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 28, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. All are criminal law or criminal law adjacent, however there is one case discussing the form of the jury’s verdict that is more broadly applicable.

McDonald v. State, 2022-KA-01073-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Wilson v. State, 2023-CA-00070-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion for PCR, holding that the motion was untimely and that the petitioner failed to establish an exception to the time bar.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Lathan v. State, 2022-KA-00927-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming a juvenile’s conviction of second-degree murder and 40-year sentence, holding that the court did not err by accepting a verdict form that did not conform to the instructions but that nonetheless conveyed the jury’s intent in a reasonably clear manner and did not err in sentencing the juvenile because neither Jones nor Miller applied.
(10-0)

NOTE – Here is the Court’s explanation of the verdict form:

The Court also noted that the defendant did not object and that the jury was polled and that all agreed with the verdict.

PRACTICE POINT – This decision is worth reading for its succinct discussion on the form of the verdict issue. It packs a lot into two pages and may come in handy for your next big verdict form dispute.

Haley v. Brewer, 2023-SA-00571-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of an inmate’s suit protesting a facility transfer, holding that the inmate had no protected liberty interest in his housing assignment within MDOC.
(10-0)

Spralls v. State, 2023-KA-00347-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of an automobile, holding that a review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and an independent review of the record that there was no reversible error.
(10-0)

Turnage v. State, 2023-KA-00432-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress because there was substantial evidence that the police had probable cause to search his vehicle under the plain view exception or in finding the automobile exception allowed for a complete search of his truck.
(8-2-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Hunter v. State, 2022-CP-01269-COA (dismissing untimely pro se motion for rehearing)
  • Gleason v. State, 2023-CP-00357-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Anderson v. Grabmiller, 2023-CA-00593-COA (dismissing appellee’s motion to strike appellant’s reply brief as moot after appellee’s notice of withdrawal and denying appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees and expenses)
  • Wilson v. State, 2023-CP-01050-COA (denying State’s motion to dsimiss and denying pro se appellant’s motion to preclude the State from filing a responsive brief)

Hand Down Page