Tag: PCR

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 16, 2024

The annual July hiatus is over and the Mississippi Court of Appeals is back today with nine opinions. There are four direct criminal appeals, including one reversal of a murder conviction. There are three real property cases, one involving a partition, one an administrative condemnation decision, and the other a landowner’s right to keep horses on her property within city limits. There is also a custody modification decision and a PCR decision. (If you notice a missing tenth judge on these cases, Judge Greenlee’s retirement from the court was effective July 1, 2024.)

JDB Rentals, LLC v. City of Verona, 2023-CA-00431-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision affirming the board of aldermen decision administratively condemning three of rental properties, holding that the exclusionary rule prohibited consideration of evidence the code-enforcement officer obtained incident to an unconstitutional search of property.
(8-1-0: Carlton concurred in result only without writing)

Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00636-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and shooting into a motor vehicle, holding that the trial court did not err by not striking four potential jurors because none of the four was seated on the jury.
(8-1-0: McDonald concurred in the result only without writing)

Shanks v. State, 2023-CP-00271-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion seeking relief from a 2003 guilty plea, holding that the claims were not subject to any exception and did not involved the parole board.
(9-0)

Wade v. Simmons Erosion Control, Inc., 2023-CA-00733-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision dividing a large tract of land between two landowners, holding that the chancellor did not commit manifest error by accepting and approving a special master’s report and choosing one of the partition options presented by the special master.
(9-0)

Sinquefield v. The City of Ridgeland, 2022-CA-01276-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision that affirmed the City’s unanimous (no nays) decision that a landowner lacked the requisite acreage to maintain two horses on her property, holding that the City had to be reined in because its interpretation of the ordinance was not based on substantial evidence and was arbitrary and capricious where the owner had ponied up and acquired possessory interest in adjacent tracts.
(6-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without trotting out a written opinion; Barnes and Emfinger did not participate)

Herrington v. State, 2022-KA-00691-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record that there were no issues that warranted reversal.
(8-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Littleton v. State, 2023-KA-00239-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing the conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the circuit court erred in admitting a recorded statement of a witness where the witness was not called giving the defendant no opportunity to cross-examine the witness in violation of the Confrontation Clause, that the admission of the statement was not harmless error, and that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to give the proposed defense instruction stating the jury’s duty to acquit should it find that the defendant acted in necessary self-defense.
(6-3-0: Lawrence and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in result only without writing)

NOTE – Here is a summary of the court’s holding that the admission of the statement was error from paragraph 42 of the opinion:

Wells v. State, 2022-KA-00707-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of conspiracy to commit murder and first-degree murder, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-0)

May v. Brown, 2023-CA-00624-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s child-custody modification order, holding that substantial evidence supported the modification giving the father primary care, control, and custody of the minor.
(8-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Estate of Green v. Michini, 2022-CA-00365-COA (denying motions for rehearing)
  • Rambo v. Kelly Natural Gas Pipelines, LLC, 2023-WC-00402-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 11, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There are four divorce-related decisions, two direct criminal appeals, a tort case dismissed for failure to state a claim, a negligence case dismissed for want of prosecution, and a PCR case.

Roley v. Roley, 2022-CP-01104-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s rulings in a divorce action, holding that that the chancellor did not err in denying appellant’s Rule 60 motion that was filed after the mandate from the appeal of the case had been entered because the mandate rule barred reconsideration and that the chancellor did not err in finding the appellant in contempt or in incarcerating him for it.
(8-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Lawrence did not participate)

Clark v. State, 2023-KA-00011-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of simple possession of a controlled substance, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief, appellant’s pro se brief, and the record that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and that there were no other issues to warrant reversal.
(10-0)

Scott v. State, 2022-KA-00830-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of touching a child for lustful purposes, nine counts of sexual battery, and one count of exploitation of a child, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for change of venue because the motion to change venue was procedurally defective and lacked merit.
(9-0)

Ware v. Ware, 2023-CA-00605-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce action, holding that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion finding that the martial home was a marital asset, in distributing the marital home equally between the parties, or in not making specific findings of fact and conclusions of law as to each Ferguson factor.
(10-0)

Hasley v. Hasley, 2023-CA-00914-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s ruling that temporary orders of separate maintenance had been converted to a final order of support, holding that the order being appealed was entered while the case was previously on appeal and that the issue sub judice was encompassed in the Court of Appeals’ prior ruling and remanding for further proceedings.
(8-2-0: Barnes and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Archer v. Harlow’s Casino Resort & Spa, 2022-CP-01060-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of the pro se plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint after the initial complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to plead fraud with particularity, holding that the proposed amended complaint failed to state a claim for relief.
(10-0)

Pace v. Pace, 2022-CA-01259-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and vacating in part the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce matter related to the sale of a jointly owned commercial building, holding that the chancellor lacked jurisdiction to grant one party’s contempt motion but affirming the chancellor’s decision ordering that party to buy the other party’s interest in the property and denial of the Rule 59 motion.
(10-0)

Jiles v. State, 2023-CP-00383-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of several PCR motions, holding that they were time-barred and successive and that and no exceptions applied, and that the remaining arguments were waived because he pleaded or because he did not raise them in the circuit court.
(10-0)

Ware v. Brown, 2023-CA-00663-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal of a negligence action for want of prosecution, holding that there was a clear record of delay including two granted motions to compel and a two-year effort to obtain one plaintiff’s relevant medical history, that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the complaint with prejudice in lieu of lesser sanctions.
(5-1(2?)-3(2?): Wilson and Smith concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part; joined by McCarty and Smith; Westbrooks did not participate.)

Other Orders

  • Patrick v. Patrick, 2021-CA-00891-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Okorie v. Nat’l Ass’n Wells Fargo Bank, 2022-CP-00043-COA (denying pro se motion for reconsideration)
  • Marshall v. State, 2022-KA-00541-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Roley v. Roley, 2022-CP-01104-COA (denying motions for reconsideration and for recusal of four judges of the Court of Appeals)
  • Hartzog v. State, 2024-TS-00033-COA (denying pro se “motion to show cause” and dismissing appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 28, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. All are criminal law or criminal law adjacent, however there is one case discussing the form of the jury’s verdict that is more broadly applicable.

McDonald v. State, 2022-KA-01073-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Wilson v. State, 2023-CA-00070-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion for PCR, holding that the motion was untimely and that the petitioner failed to establish an exception to the time bar.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Lathan v. State, 2022-KA-00927-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming a juvenile’s conviction of second-degree murder and 40-year sentence, holding that the court did not err by accepting a verdict form that did not conform to the instructions but that nonetheless conveyed the jury’s intent in a reasonably clear manner and did not err in sentencing the juvenile because neither Jones nor Miller applied.
(10-0)

NOTE – Here is the Court’s explanation of the verdict form:

The Court also noted that the defendant did not object and that the jury was polled and that all agreed with the verdict.

PRACTICE POINT – This decision is worth reading for its succinct discussion on the form of the verdict issue. It packs a lot into two pages and may come in handy for your next big verdict form dispute.

Haley v. Brewer, 2023-SA-00571-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of an inmate’s suit protesting a facility transfer, holding that the inmate had no protected liberty interest in his housing assignment within MDOC.
(10-0)

Spralls v. State, 2023-KA-00347-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of an automobile, holding that a review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and an independent review of the record that there was no reversible error.
(10-0)

Turnage v. State, 2023-KA-00432-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress because there was substantial evidence that the police had probable cause to search his vehicle under the plain view exception or in finding the automobile exception allowed for a complete search of his truck.
(8-2-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Hunter v. State, 2022-CP-01269-COA (dismissing untimely pro se motion for rehearing)
  • Gleason v. State, 2023-CP-00357-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Anderson v. Grabmiller, 2023-CA-00593-COA (dismissing appellee’s motion to strike appellant’s reply brief as moot after appellee’s notice of withdrawal and denying appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees and expenses)
  • Wilson v. State, 2023-CP-01050-COA (denying State’s motion to dsimiss and denying pro se appellant’s motion to preclude the State from filing a responsive brief)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 21, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down a bounty of twelve opinions yesterday. I noticed a stray opinion from Thursday, May 9 so that is also summarized below. With a total of thirteen opinions, there is a lot of ground covered.

Martin v. State, 2023-KA-00044-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault and armed robbery after a trial in absentia, holding that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Tilley v. Gibbs, 2022-CA-01150-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment awarding physical custody of a child to the father, holding that the chancellor did not err in his Albright analysis and that substantial, credible evidence supported the custody determination.
(10-0)

Hamer v. State, 023-CP-00701-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of relief and dismissal of PCR motion without an evidentiary hearing, holding that the PCR motion lacked sufficient support to warrant a evidentiary hearing.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

McVay v. State, 2022-KA-00523-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of four counts of capital murder and one count of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error in admitting evidence of prior bad acts during cross-examination of the defendant and holding that the defendant’s trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective for failing to object.
(7-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Carlton did not participate)

Jackson v. State, 2022-KA-01143-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and burglary and sentence to life without eligibility for early release, probation, or parole, holding that the indictment was not fatally defective; that there was no plain error in denying a motion to suppress the defendant’s statements to law enforcement where the defendant made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of Miranda; that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s proposed insanity defense and imperfect self-defense instructions; and that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Wilson and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Practice Point – This is a handy citation to tuck away for one of those “I know its true by I can’t find a case that says so” situations:

Thompson v. State, 2023-CP-00218-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of the petitioner’s fourth and fifth PCR motions, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding them time-barred.
(10-0)

Smith v. West, 2023-CA-00297-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for failure to prosecute a personal injury case, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion after granting several continuances over nearly ten years since the action was commenced.
(10-0)

Signaigo v. Grinstead, 2022-CA-01212-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings in an adverse possession action, affirming the finding that the plaintiff could not prove the ownership element but reversing the finding that title was vested in the defendant as a matter of law because that issue was beyond the scope of the motion for summary judgment.
(8-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2022-CA-01175-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s findings in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in the equitable division of marital property, in determining the amount of child support, in determining the amount of alimony, or in denying the mother’s request for attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Carr v. State, 2022-KA-00491-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the State did not commit prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments such that the court was required to intervene on its own initiative.
(10-0)

Pickens v. State, 2022-KA-00822-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of meth while in possession of a firearm, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and independently reviewing the record that there were no errors warranting reversal.
(10-0)

Hearn v. State, 2023-CP-00275-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding the motion time-barred and that no statutory exceptions applied.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

From May 9, 2024

Daniels v. State, 2022-KA-00705-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after the the defendant was convicted of one count of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, three counts of aggravated assault, and one count of shooting into an occupied dwelling, holding that indictment’s error as to the count for murder was harmless so the conviction of the lesser-included offense of manslaughter was affirmed but holding that the indictment was legally insufficient as to aggravated assault counts and that the error was compounded by repetition in jury instructions and the State’s closing arguments.
4-1*-5: Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald, Lawrence and Smith (each of whom also joined the lead opinion); Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes, Carlton, Wilson, and McCarty.)

Other Orders

  • Arnold v. State, 2021-KA-01426-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Rutland v. Regions Bank, 2022-CA-00720-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Malone v. State, 2022-CP-00958-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Boyett v. Cain, 2022-CP-00978-COA (denying rehearing)
  • EEECHO Inc. v. Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, 2022-SA-01068-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Boyette v. State, 2022-CP-01239-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 14, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions this week. There is a domestic/separate maintenance decision, a third-party assault tort case, a direct appeal of a felony conviction, and two PCR cases.

Hasley v. Hasley, 2022-CA-00908-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s decision in a separate maintenance action, holding that there was no abuse of discretion in denying the husband’s motion to dismiss the complaint but that the chancellor erred by converting the temporary orders of spousal support to a final order.
(10-0)

White v. State, 2023-CP-00200-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the circuit court’s revocation of release, holding that because the circuit judge had been the assistant DA who had prosecuted the petitioner the judge was disqualified from presiding over the revocation hearing and that this error was not harmless.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Mack v. Merimac Apartments, 2022-CA-00897-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming summary judgment in a third-party assault case against an apartment complex, holding that evidence of some crime occurring on and near the subject property was sufficient summary judgment evidence on the element of proximate cause.
(6-3-1: Barnes and Wilson concurred in part and in the judgment without writing; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Galarza v. State, 022-KA-01066-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in admitting character evidence of the defendant’s prior convictions for manslaughter.
(7-3-0: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; McCarty concurred in the result only without separate written opinion.)

Smith v. State, 023-CP-00538-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that the petitioner’s claims were procedurally barred and that there was no merit to the petitioner’s arguments that he was entitled to a bifurcated hearing at sentencing and that there was insufficient proof of his prior convictions to warrant his sentencing as a habitual offender.
(10-0)

Other Orders

  • Kuebler v. State, 2020-KA-00027-COA (remanding sua sponte for correction of the record)
  • Okorie v. National Association Wells Fargo Bank, 2022-CP-00043-COA (denying appellant’s pro se “motion to reopen case based on fraudulent settlement agreement”)
  • Moore v. State, 2022-KA-00327-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Edwards v. State, 2022-KA-00719-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Smith v. State, 2022-KA-00852-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Saddler v. State, 2024-TS-00099-COA (sua sponte allowing appeal to proceed)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of May 9, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions today. There is an decision about whether a subdivision’s roads are public or private, a Miller PCR case, a decisions about the applicability of McArn exceptions to at-will employment, and a felony case analyzing three jury instructions.

Newton County, Mississippi v. Deerfield Estates Subdivision Property Owners Association, LLC, 2022-CA-01227-SCT
(Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a case about whether the main roads in a subdivision are private or public roads, holding that the chancery court did not err in finding that the roads were accepted by the county via express common law dedication where the boards accepted the roads in its minutes, the rights of way over the roads, no tax had been levied on the rights of way, and the public had unrestricted access to the roads.
(9-0)

McDowell v. State, 2021-CT-01381-SCT (Civil – PCR)
Reversing sentence of life without parole after a resentencing trial pursuant to Miller, holding that the trial court’s unopposed grant of a jury trial under Miss Code. Ann. § 99-19-101(3) (Rev. 2020) made that section applicable to the entirety of the proceedings and therefore the trial court erred by conducting a Miller analysis and sentencing the defendant to life without parole.
(5-2-2: Maxwell concurred in part and in the result, joined by Randolph and Chamberlin; Beam dissented, joined by Griffis, and joined in part by Randolph and Maxwell.)

Brandi’s Hope Community Services, LLC v. Walters, 2022-CT-00188-SCT (Civil – Torts/Other)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the Court of Appeals and circuit court’s decisions after a wrongful termination verdict in the plaintiff’s favor, holding that the public policy exceptions to at-will employment established in McArn v. Allied Bruce-Terminix Co., Inc., do not conflict with the reporting protections in section 43-47-37(5)(b) of the Vulnerable Persons Act and that the plaintiff was qualified to bring wrongful termination claims.
(9-0)

Saxton v. State, 2023-KA-00226-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the trial court erred in granting an unopposed instruction that contained an “incomplete” statement of Mississippi’s self-defense law but that the error did not result in a miscarriage of justice in light of other instructions given, that the trial court did not in in granting a definitional instruction on “imminent danger,” and that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s self-defense instruction as repetitive.
(5-4: Maxwell specially concurred, joined by Kitchens, Coleman, and Chamberlin; Kitchens concurred in part and in the result, joined by King and Ishee, and joined in part by Coleman.)

Other Orders

  • Fortenberry v. State, 2017-M-01026 (granting application for leave to file PCR petition)
  • Walter v. State, 2021-M-01125 (denying an application for leave to proceed in the trial court, and finding the filing frivolous and warning that future frivolous filings could be met with sanctions)
  • Patel v. State, 2022-CT-00985-SCT (denying cert)
  • Harris v. State, 2022-KA-01195-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Kelly v. State, 2023-M-00482 (denying application for leave to file PCR petition)
  • Deutchman v. The Mississippi Bar, 2024-BD-00009-SCT (granting leave to resign in good standing from the practicing of law in Mississippi)

Hand Down Page

A couple of pictures from my trip to circuit court in Warren County yesterday:

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 7, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down ten opinions today. They started out with a run of short and sweet 10-0 opinions and then things got more interesting. There are two split opinions on the admission of confessions, a construction contract/negligence case, a divorce decision, several more direct criminal appeals, and a couple of PCR opinions.

Johnson v. State, 2022-KA-01127-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that after a review of counsel’s Lindsey Brief and the record that there was no reversible error.
(10-0)

Carter v. State, 2023-KA-00052-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s accident instruction and that the castle-doctrine’s presumption of fear was procedurally barred and that the evidence was sufficient to show that the defendant did not act in self defense.
(10-0)

Reed v. State, 2023-KA-00248-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of hydrocodone/acetaminophen, holding that after a review of counsel’s Lindsey Brief and the record that there was no reversible error.
(10-0)

Dobbins v. State, 2023-CA-00562-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary dismissal of PCR petition, holding that the petition was statutorily barred.
(10-0)

Mac Long Homes, LLC v. Olvera Construction, LLC, 2022-CA-00938-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the circuit court’s dismissal of of a contractor’s claims against a subcontractor after the contractor lost an arbitration proceeding against the homeowner, holding that the breach of contract and negligent misrepresentation claims were time-barred, that the common-law indemnity claim was not yet ripe so dismissal without prejudice was proper, that the negligence claim was not time-barred, and that the circuit court did not err in denying the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald and McCarty; Wilson concurred in the result only without separate written opinion)

NOTE – The common-law indemnity holding here is interesting. I have been in and around the argument that crossclaims of common-law indemnity against codefendants are not proper for lack of ripeness. I expect that this opinion will be cited frequently in the future.

Hollon v. State, 2023-CP-00202-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR petition, holding that the guilty plea was voluntary and not coerced, that trial counsel was not ineffective, and that the petitioner was not otherwise entitled to relief.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Winstead, v. State, 2022-KA-01235-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death, holding that the trial court erred in admitting the defendant’s confession because it was obtained in violation of Edwards v. Arizona but that the error was harmless in light of the overwhelming weight of evidence of guilt, and holding that the trial court did not err by admitting a bloodstain card.
(6-4: Carlton concurred in part and in the result without writing; Greenlee and Smith concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Lawrence concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Carlton, Greenlee, and Smith.)

NOTE – The partial dissent took issue with the majority’s holding that the confession should have been excluded. Here is the majority’s summary of its holding on that issue:

Smith v. State, 2023-KA-00185-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery of a minor, holding that the circuit court did not err in admitting the defendant’s confession or by holding the trial in absentia.
(4-2-4: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; McCarty dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McDonald, and joined in part by Barnes and Emfinger)

Weatherly v. Weatherly, 2022-CA-00804-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in awarding sole physical custody to the mother, in awarding child support to the mother to the father despite the mother’s significantly higher income, in the valuation and distribution of marital property, in awarding the father alimony, or in denying the father’s request for attorney’s fees.
(3-2-4: McDonald and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Barnes, Westbrooks, and Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Wilson concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes, Westbrooks, and Emfinger, and joined in part by McDonald and McCarty; Smith did not participate)

City of Verona v. Moffett, 2022-WC-01050-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s finding that a former police officer sustained an 80% loss of wage-earning capacity, holding that there was substantial, credible evidence supporting the Commission’s decision that was based on evidence of physical injuries and PTSD resulting from a physical assault while the claimant was responding to a domestic violence call.
(6-1-3: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson dissented, joined by Smith and Emfinger.)

Other Orders

  • Silver Dollar Sales, Inc. v. Battah, 2022-CA-00476-COA (rehearing denied)
  • Fluker v. State, 2022-KA-00692-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Quinn v. State, 2022-KA-00962-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 30, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions on Tuesday. I had court in Union County that took me out of the office most of the day Tuesday. I then spent Wednesday making up for being out of the office on Tuesday, as one does. (Obligatory courthouse picture, infra.)

Taylor v. Johnson, 2022-CA-00734-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming grant of summary judgment in a car wreck negligence case, holding that there was no competent summary judgment evidence that the defendant proximately caused the collision, and then affirming summary judgment on the direct-negligence and punitive damages claims as moot.
(8-1-1: McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks dissented without writing)

Whiddon v. State, 2022-KA-00616-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, aggravated assault of a law enforcement officer, and fleeing a law enforcement officer, holding that the trial court did not err in denying motions to dismiss for lack of speedy trial, that the circuit court abused its discretion in excluding videotaped witness statements but that the error was harmless, that the court did not commit reversible error in commenting in front of the jury that a witness was “an excellent investigator,” that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-3-0: McDonald and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in the result only without writing)

Turner v. Turner, 2023-CA-00216-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing dismissal of complaint for divorce, holding that the chancellor erred by considering matters outside of the pleadings when ruling on a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) without converting it into a motion for summary judgment and providing necessary notice.
(10-0)

Suarez v. State, 2023-KA-00526-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of an occupied dwelling under circumstances likely to terrorize the occupant, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s lesser-included-offense jury instruction.
(7-3-0: Wilson, McDonald, and McCarty concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Harris v. State, 2023-CP-00227-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion following probation revocation, holding that the trial court’s failure to inquire about the petitioner’s ability to pay his fees and assessments was harmless error at most.
(10-0)

Crawford v. East Miss. State Hospital, Inc., 2022-CA-00753-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming judgment in favor of a hospital in a wrongful death lawsuit after bench trial, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the plaintiff did not prove the proximate cause element or in denying the plaintiff’s claim for the decedent’s “lifetime damages” because the estate was initially a party before being removed as a party via amendment to the complaint.
(6-2: McCarty concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks; McDonald and Smith did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Mississippi Dept. of Rehab. Servs v. Butler, 2022-CA-00176-COA (rehearing denied)
  • Harris v. Ratcliff, 2022-CA-00596-COA (rehearing denied)
  • Simmons v. State, 2022-KA-01260-COA (rehearing denied)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 19, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. There was a med mal case dismissed on statute of limitations grounds, an IIED verdict, an interpleader by a bank to determine the appropriate beneficiary-on-death of a CD, a zoning decision, a felony conviction, and a few PCR cases.

Jordan v. States, 2022-CP-00874-COA, consolidated with 2022-CP-00877-COA and 2023-CP-00072-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denials of three PCR motions, holding that all three motions were barred as subsequent PCR motions and that no exception to the bar was supported.
(10-0)

Jones v. State, 2022-KA-01117-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of child exploitation after the “underage female” the defendant attempted to meet up with turned out to be an undercover officer, holding that the entrapment jury instruction was properly rejected and that the convictions were not against he overwhelming weight of evidence.
(10-0)

Rogers v. NewSouth NeuroSpine LLC, 2022-CP-01036-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations and denying post-judgment motions, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion denying the pro se plaintiff’s Rule 60 motion and also denying the defendants’ motion for sanctions, damages, and fees.
(10-0)

Gray v. Johnson, 2023-CA-00339-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in an interpleader initiated by a bank over the proper “pay-on-death” beneficiary of a CD, holding that the designation was latently ambiguous but that extrinsic evidence supported the chancellor’s decision whcih was not an abuse of discretion and was not wrong or clearly erroneous.
(6-4-0: Wilson, McCarty, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Greenlee concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Jackson County, Mississippi, v. Marcellus, 2023-CA-00111-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision that had reversed the decision of the Board of Supervisors denying a request to reclassify property from residential to commercial, holding that the Board’s decision was not arbitrary and capricious that the owner had not proved a change in character and a public need by clear and convincing evidence.
(9-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Bain v. State, 2023-CP-00206-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing dismissal of PCR motion for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the petitioner did not need to obtain permission from the Supreme Court to file his petition.
(9-1-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Green v. State, 2023-CP-00448-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the motion was barred as successive and that none of the exceptions applied, and that they lacked merit.
(8-2-0: McCarty and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Weaver v. Ross, 2022-CA-00426-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming a judgment in favor of a car restorer against a man who initiated litigation by suing for alleged negligent restoration after a jury trial, holding that the trial court did not err in excluding medical records related to the owner’s blood pressure for lack of authentication and an invoice on allegedly comparative restoration, that the verdict on IIED was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the overwhelming weight of it, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees.
(6-4-0: McCarty specially concurred, joined by Greenlee, Westbrooks, McDonald, Lawrence, and Smith; Wilson concurred in part and in the result, joined by Lawrence, McCarty, and Emfinger and joined in part by Greenlee, Westbrooks, McDonald, and Smith.)

NOTE – McCarty’s special concurrence has precedential effect. You should read it for its discussion and clarification of the fact that claims for IIED cannot stem from the distress caused solely by litigation.

Wilson’s concurrence was one full vote short of precedential effect, but was joined in part by four additional judges. Wilson joined Parts I and II of the majority opinion, but parted ways over the analysis of the attorney’s fees issue. Wilson agreed the judgment should be affirmed because the challenge to the award of attorney’s fees was procedurally barred, but would have reversed if it was not barred.

PRACTICE POINT – Wilson’s concurrence contains a good reminder of the importance of reviewing the record on appeal for completeness. Don’t assume the circuit clerk included everything you designated.

Other Orders

DeJohnette v. State, 2022-KA-00249-COA (denying rehearing)

Gilmer v. State, 2022-KM-00257-COA (denying rehearing)

Hutson v. Hutson, 2022-CA-00569-COA (denying rehearing)

Daly v. Raines, 2022-CA-00600-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Double Issue: Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 6, 2024 and February 13, 2024

[Edited to correct the year in the title. I am behind, but I am not a whole year behind.]

I was about snowed under last week so I am trying to catch up here a bit. The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions on February 6 and another nine on February 13.

February 6, 2024

Porter v. State, 2023-CP-00091-COA (Civil – Other)
Vacating the trial court’s denial of a request to be reclassified as a non-habitual offender, holding that the petitioner was not a habitual offender but that his claims were filed in the wrong county so the case was remanded with instructions for the trial court to transfer to the appropriate county.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Gilmore v. State, 2023-CP-00527-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the motion was time-barred and not subject to any of the exceptions.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Ellis v. Turner-Johnson Dodge, Inc., 2022-CA-01126-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the county court’s order compelling arbitration, holding that there was a valid, binding arbitration agreement and that the dispute was within the scope of the agreement.
(7-2: Westbrooks and McDonald dissented; Smith did not participate)

Practice Point – Cite the record early and often in your briefs:

Moates v. State, 2022-KA-01062-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first degree murder, burglary of a dwelling under circumstances likely to terrorize, and simple domestic violence, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to sever the first-degree murder charge, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of prior bad acts, that the evidence was sufficient to support the simple domestic violence conviction, and that retroactive misjoinder argument was moot.
(10-0)

Practice Point – This is a good reminder that “prejudice” is not the test under Rule 403.

Other Orders

Gilbert v. State, 2021-KA-01265-COA (denying rehearing)

Kilcrease v. City of Tupelo, 2022-KM-00194-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

February 13, 2024

Williams v. Bryant, 2022-CA-00630-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a will contest, holding that the chancellor did not err in determining that there was a confidential relationship but that the evidence did not show abuse or suspicious circumstances or active involvement in procurement or execution of the will that would create a presumption of undue influence.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00935-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on the defendant’s alternative defense theory of heat-of-passion manslaughter.
(10-0)

Netherland v. State, 2022-CP-01236-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the petitioner’s Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights were not violated when law enforcement recorded the petitioner selling drugs to an informant and that there was no merit to the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.
(10-0)

Brooks v. State, 2022-KA-01016-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of a dwelling, simple assault domestic violence, and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the conviction for possession of a firearm was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Barnes and Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing)

EEECHO Inc. v. Mississippi Dept. Env’t Quality Permit Bd, 2022-SA-01068-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision affirming MDEQ’s Permit Board’s decision to issue water quality certifications, holding that the Permit Board did not err by not making factual findings regarding the possible storage of explosive ammunition, that the Permit Board’s failure to issue a revise public notice was not arbitrary or capricious, that the Permit Board’s decision that the subject property was preferable to the alternative project sites, and that the Permit Board’s failure to conduct an environmental justice review.
(8-2: McDonald dissented, joined by Westbrooks; Westbrooks dissented without writing)

Smith v. Smith, 2022-CA-00183-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancery court’s child custody and division or martial estate decisions, holding that the chancellor did not err or abuse his discretion in awarding custody to the father or in his visitation ruling, but that the chancellor erred by classifying one of the father’s businesses as separate property.
(10-0)

Wade v. State, 2022-CA-00370-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court’s decision that the plea was voluntary and intelligent notwithstanding the petitioner’s low intellectual ability, that there was no merit to the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, and that Miller did not apply because the felony convictions did not mandate life imprisonment.
(6-4-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Carlton, Westbrooks, and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Hunter v. State, 2022-CP-01269-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying the motion as untimely.
(10-0)

Clarksdale Pub. Utilities Comm’ v. Miss. Dept. of Emp’t Sec., 2022-CC-01085-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision affirming MDES Review Board’s decision approving unemployment benefits, holding that MDES was not collaterally estopped from making the benefits decision as a result of MDEC and CPOC having different standards and definitions of misconduct, that the ALJ did not err in refusing the admit 900 pages of exhibits that the employer offered for lack of foundation, and that there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the ALJ’s findings.
(3-2-3: Westbrooks and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in the result only without writing; Greenlee concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Carlton concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Greenlee and Lawrence; Barnesn did not participate)

Other Orders

Bradshaw v. Bradshaw, 2017-CT-01731-COA (granting motion to seal file on appeal)

Odom v. State, 2021-KA-00676-COA (denying rehearing)

Harrison v. Harrison, 2022-CA-00274-COA (denying rehearing)

Litton v. Litton, 2022-CA-00712-COA (denying rehearing)

Johnson v. Drake, 2022-CA-00818-COA (denying rehearing)

Forrest v. State, 2022-KA-00844-COA (granting pro se letter motion to recall mandate)

Patel v. State, 2022-CA-00985-COA (denying rehearing)

Fox v. State, 2022-KA-00988-COA (granting motion to expedite mandate)

Harvey v. State, 2023-CT-00157-COA (recalling mandate sua sponte)

Clark v. State, 2023-TS-01116-COA (granting motion to proceed out of time)

Odom v. State, 2023-TS-01165-COA (granting public defender’s motion withdraw, to substitute counsel, and respond to order to show cause)

Winn Dixie Stores v. Little, 2023-WC-01177-COA (granting motion to dismiss appeal as interlocutory)

Holifiend v. State, 2023-TS-01320-COA (granting motion to proceed out of time)

Hand Down Page