Tag: Personal Injury

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of June 19 and June 26, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions last week and three this week. Among them, two election contests, a death penalty PCR case that was remanded, an MTCA personal injury case on interlocutory appeal, and a felony conviction.

June 19, 2025

Brown v. Madison County Board of Supervisors, 2024-EC-01059-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision in an election contest, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying a motion to disqualify the Board’s attorney and in affirming the Board’s decision approving the candidate’s candidacy.
(9-0: Randolph for the Court)

Clark v. State, 2022-DR-00829-SCT (Civil – Death Penalty – PCR)
Granting motion for PCR in a death-penalty case, holding that the case should be remanded to the circuit court for an Atkins hearing but otherwise denying relief under Batson and other issues.
(5-3-1: Sullivan for the Court; Randolph concurred in part and in the result, joined by Griffis and Branning, joined in part by Maxwell; King concurred in part and dissented)

Other Orders

  • Melom v. Stone County, Mississippi, 2024-KM-00782-SCT (per curiam affirmance)
  • In Re: Rules Governing Admission to The Mississippi Bar, 89-R-99012-SCT
  • Clark v. State, 2022-DR-00829-SCT (granting in part and denying in part motion for PCR or for leave to proceed in trial court with PCR motion)
  • Chung v. State, 2023-CA-00362-SCT (granting cert)
  • Powers v. State, 2023-DR-00895-SCT (denying cert)
  • Lawson v. State, 2023-CT-01008-SCT (denying cert)
  • Mississippi Baptist Medical Center, Inc. v. Tobias, 2024-M-01395-SCT (denying petition for interlocutory appeal)
  • The Progressive Corporation v. Hanberry, 2025-IA-00109-SCT (granting interlocutory appeal and deciding the case on the petition and response, affirming the denial of a motion to sever but reversing the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment in the plaintiff’s favor insurance policy dec action)
  • The Mississippi Bar v. Horne-Murry, 2025-BD-00616-SCT (granting petition to transfer respondent to inactive disability status and referring to LJAP)

Hand Down Page

June 26, 2025

In Re: Republican Primary Runoff for Pearl River County Tax Collector/Assessor, Jo Lynn Houston v. Sandy Kane Smith, 2024-EC-00015-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Affirming on direct appeal and dismissing cross-appeal in an election contest, holding that the trial court did not err in ordering a special election in two precincts or in finding that certain vote challenges were mere technicalities.
(9-0: Branning for the Court; Randolph did not participate)

City of Jackson, Mississippi v. Maxie, 2023-IA-01314-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of summary judgment in an MTCA personal injury action, holding that the plaintiff did not come forward with evidence that there was a dangerous condition of which the defendants had actual or constructive notice and time to correct or warn against.
(9-0: Coleman for the Court)

Cole v. State, 2024-KA-00041-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of attempted statutory rape, holding that the admission of the victim’s interview did not violate the Confrontation Clause or amount to error under the evidentiary rules, that the admission of the CAD report with a date that was off by one century was not plain error, that there was no plain error in the admission of the State’s expert’s testimony on the victim’s veracity or the State’s characterization of that testimony, and that the cumulative error doctrine did not apply.
(9-0: King for the Court)

Other Orders

  • In Re: The Mississippi Access to Justice Commission, 89-R-99032-SCT ((1) directing the Mississippi Bar, effective July 1, 2025, to remit all pro hac vice fees received under M.R.A.P. 46(b)(5) monthly to the Administrative Office of Courts with two-thirds of the fees to be deposited in the Civil Legal Assistance Fund established by Miss. Code Section 9-21-43 (Rev. 2019) and one-third of the fees to be deposited in the Access to Justice Fund, and (2) directing the Mississippi Bar on or before November 1 of each year to file with this Court an annual report accounting for the receipt of all pro hac vice funds under Rule 46(b)(5))
  • In Re: The Mississippi Access to Justice Commission, 89-R-99032-SCT (order (1) directing the Mississippi Bar, effective July 1, 2025, to remit all funds received by it under Mississippi Rule of Professional Conduct 6.1 monthly to the Administrative Office of Courts to be deposited in the Access to Justice Fund, (2) directing the Mississippi Bar, effective July 1, 2025, to remit all funds currently held in Guaranty Bank Checking Account No. *2492 (The Mississippi Bar Access to Justice account) to the Administrative Office of Courts to be deposited in the Access to Justice Fund, and (3) directing the Mississippi Bar on or before June 1 of each year to file with this Court an annual report accounting for the receipt of all funds under Mississippi Rule of Professional Conduct 6.1.)
  • Ambrose v. State, 2022-DR-00949-SCT (granting State’s motion to dimiss)
  • Ambrose v. State, 2024-CA-00897-SCT (granting motion for voluntary dismissal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 13 and May 20, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions last week and a hearty eleven today. There are some interesting cases in the mix and a summary of each is below.

May 13, 2025

May v. May, 2023-CA-01022-COA, consolidated with 2023-M-01401-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Vacating the chancellor’s order of contempt for failure to pay child support but affirming his denial of the motion to recuse, holding that the chancery court did not have personal jurisdiction for purposes of a contempt ruling for want of service under Rule 81, but that although the chancellor erred in finding that the motion for recusal was untimely it was nevertheless within his discretion to deny it.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in result only without writing)

Fortner v. IMS Engineers, Inc., 2023-CA-01170-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a company that had been engaged to oversee and manage road improvement projects until about ten months before a fatal accident occurred, holding that there was no evidence that the company owed a duty of care once its involvement ended and the City took over the management role.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Carlton did not participate)

Horne v. Dolgencorp LLC, 2024-CA-00376-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a trip-and-fall case after a customer tripped on merchandise in an aisle, holding that there was no evidence that the store had actual or constructive knowledge of the presence of the dangerous condition.
(8-2: Westbrooks and McDonald dissented without writing)

Shipley v. Shipley, 2023-CA-00814-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming judgment modifying the custody arrangement by giving the mother sole physical and legal custody, holding that the chancellor did not err in modifying physical and legal custody based the mother’s relocation to Oregon, that the chancellor’s did not err by failing to consider the totality of the circumstances, that the chancellor did not give undue weight to one Albright factor, and that the argument that the chancellor erred by not sua sponte appointing a GAL to investigate allegations of abuse was procedurally barred, and declining to address child support in after ruling that the chancellor did not err in its custody decision.
(7-3: Wilson dissented, joined by Carlton and Emfinger)

Magyar v. Shiers, 2023-CA-00682-COA (Torts – Other)
Affirming bench trial decision finding the defendant liable for malicious prosecution and awarding compensatory and punitive damages, holding that there was evidence to support each element of malicious prosecution where the defendant had filed charging affidavits against the plaintiffs alleging that they were intentionally damaging his property by allowing sewage from a leaking septic system to run into his property but the justice court dismissed the charges for lack of evidence.
(10-0)

Mueller Industries, Inc. v. Waits, 2023-WC-00494-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Reversing the Commission’s decision ordering a lump sum payment, holding that the information in the record did not permit the Court to review the Commission’s computations of TPD and remanding for the Commission to determine whether TPD was properly calculated and credited, determine whether the claimant received more than the maximum weekly benefit and whether the Employer/Carrier should receive a credit for overpayment, and ensure that the Employer/Carrier was not charged with penalties or interest after the date the Commission found that no further benefits were owed.
(8-2: Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald and joined in part by McCarty)

Other Orders

  • Mount v. State, 2023-KA-00807-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Begnaud v. Begnaud, 2023-CA-00822-COA (denying rehearing)
  • In the Matter of Estate of Tate: Garfield v. Tate, 2023-CA-01262-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

May 20, 2025

Mask v. Baggett, 2024-CA-00181-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decisions denying a motion for contempt and attorney’s fees in a divorce action for lack of proof, holding that the chancellor’s finding that neither party had sufficient proof to support motions for contempt and attorney’s fees was supported by the record and lack of record, that the appellant failed to show that the chancellor abused his discretion by denying the Rule 59 motion due to clear error or manifest injustice.
(10-0)

Bickes v. Swain, 2024-CA-00187-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the mother of the bride and the venue in a premises liability suit filed by a wedding guest who hurt his leg stepping off a porch at the venue, holding that the circuit court did not err in granting summary judgment without conducting a hearing that had been set and that summary judgment was proper because there was no evidence of a dangerous condition that could support liability regardless of whether the plaintiff was classified as a licensee or an invitee.
(7-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Page v. State, 2024-CP-00613-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s rejection of the plaintiff’s motion for discovery in the circuit court in which he was convicted of attacking a woman with a knife two decades ago, holding that the circuit court did not err in rejecting the claim as a standalone claim separate from a PCR petition though the circuit court incorrectly “denied” the motion instead of “dismissing” the motion for lack of personal jurisdiction.
(10-0)

Jones v. State, 2023-KA-01157-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of armed robbery, holding that the circuit court did not commit plain error in excluding evidence of a witness’s prior convictions because the weight of evidence of guilt was overwhelming, that the Miranda violation arguments were procedurally barred and did not merit reversal under the plain error doctrine.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Pickett v. State, 2024-KA-00511-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of burglary of a dwelling with intent to commit a larceny, holding that the issue of the circuit court’s denial of the motions for directed verdict was procedurally barred and lacked merit because the evidence was sufficient and the verdict not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and the circuit court did not err in denying the motions without making specific findings of fact.
(10-0)

Mortera v. Kona Villa Owners Association, Inc., 2023-CA-01297-COA (Civil – Property Damage)
Reversing summary judgment that was entered in favor of an HOA that declined to pursue a property damage claim on behalf of a condo unit owner, holding that based on the bylaws and insurance policy terms there was a genuine fact dispute over the HOA’s status of a fiduciary.
(9-0)

Parrott v. Frierson, 2023-SA-01245-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s dismissal of taxpayers’ petition appealing the Board of Tax Appeals’ order, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the chancellor’s finding that “yard sales” where the taxpayers purchased storage units and sold the contents were not isolated, casual, or occasional sales but sales made in the course of business and subject to sales tax, that the chancellor did not err in finding that the MDOR’s income tax assessment was prima facie correct, that the taxpayers did not overcome the presumption of correctness, and that the chancellor properly affirmed assessment of penalties and interest.
(10-0)

Forrest County General Hospital v. Knight, 2023-WC-01277-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the Commission’s order that affirmed the AJ’s order that the claimant suffered an 80% industrial loss of use of the right leg and reducing it to 60% due to apportionment but reversed the AJ’s finding of no loss of wage-earning capacity and awarded 15% LWEC for the low back injury, holding that under the deferential standard of review there was evidence to support the Commission’s decision.
(10-0)

Roach v. Roach, 2024-CA-00236-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s denial of the ex-wife’s Rule 60(b) motion after the ex-husband was granted a divorce on the grounds of habitual cruel and inhumane treatment, holding that the chancery court did not err in finding that service of process by certified mail was proper and that the ex-wife failed to show exceptional circumstances related to her claim that her prior attorney was ineffective warranting relief under Rule 60(b).
(10-0)

Allen & Smith Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Merrill, 2023-CA-00468-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming summary judgment granted in favor of a former employee in a breach of contract claim alleging violations of a non-compete agreement, holding that the court had appellate jurisdiction even though the judgment did not include the language “no just reason for delay” and that the circuit court did not err in finding certain provisions ambiguous and striking them from the agreement.
(5-5: Carlton and Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes, and McCarty and joined in party by Carlton and Emfinger)

NOTE – I hope this one goes up on cert. My impression is that the holding of the principal opinion would relax the Rule 54(b) standard as it has been enforced. In the meantime, I would not stop putting all of the Rule 54(b) magic language in your judgments.

Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2024-CA-00455-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing summary judgment in favor of the defendant based on judicial estoppel after the plaintiff failed to disclose this personal injury claim in her bankruptcy proceedings, holding that the “acceptance” element of judicial estoppel was not met where the bankruptcy as dismissed without a discharge.
(8-2: Emfinger dissented, joined by Wilson)

Other Orders

  • Culbertson v. State, 2023-KA-00588-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Boone v. State, 2023-KA-00684-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Gibson v. State, 2023-KA-00704-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Grimes v. State, 2023-KA-01254-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Burnette v. State, 2023-CP-01330-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 13, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court waited until I was out of town last week to unleash its largest batch of opinions of the year. Six opinions were handed down on Thursday, including one of my cases which was on interlocutory appeal for a service of process issue. There is also one direct criminal appeal, two breach of contract cases (one trial and one summary judgment), an election contest, and a statute of limitations case.

The Court also adopted a new rule of evidence that is “residual exception” to the rule against hearsay.

Unruh v. Johnson, 2024-IA-00028-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of motions to dismiss for insufficient service of process, holding that the trial court erred by granting the plaintiff’s motion for enlargement of time to serve process because the plaintiff could not show “good cause” where both the motion for enlargement of time and the first service attempt came one day after the 120-day service period ended and the plaintiff failed to articulate a legitimate basis for failing to attempt to timely serve process, holding that filing the motion for enlargement of time one day after the 120-day period did not toll the statute of limitations, and rendering judgment in favor of the defendant.
(9-0)

Note – I represented the appellant/defendant in this appeal. I jumped in on this one with Bobby Stephenson when I joined Wilkins Patterson last summer right after interlocutory appeal was granted.

Phillips v. State, 2023-KA-01218-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the admission of statements on body-camera footage were not testimonial and statements in search warrant affidavit did not violate the Confrontation Clause, that introducing underlying facts and circumstances of the search warrant containing a comment about the defendant’s post-Miranda silence was error albeit harmless, that the cumulative error doctrine did not apply, and that the defendant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel.
(8-0: Randolph did not participate)

Radco Fishing and Rental Tools, Inc. v. Commercial Resources, Inc., 2023-CA-00376-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming judgment against the defendant for outstanding principal and interest under an accounts receivable line of credit agreement and award of attorneys’ fees, holding that the trial court did not err by granting a motion for partial summary judgment dismissing affirmative defenses, that the defendants’ motions for summary judgment are not reviewable on appeal after they proceeded to trial and litigated, that the trial court did not err by granting a motion to admit parol evidence, that the trial court did not err in denying the defendants’ motions for directed verdict and granting the plaintiff’s motion for directed verdict, that the trial court did not err in granting the plaintiff’s jury instruction on liability, that the trial court did not err by denying the defendants’ post-trial motions, and that the trial court did not err in altering the judgment due to the jury’s disregard of the peremptory instruction and directed verdict, and that the trial court did not err by granting the plaintiff’s motion to bifurcate and award attorneys’ fees.
(6-6*-2: Maxwell specially concurred, joined by five other justices, making it binding precedent; Griffis concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Coleman)

*Precedential Special Concurrence – With a total of six votes, Maxwell’s special concurrence is precedent and provides significant guidance for the bench and bar going forward, so it deserves its own summary. The special concurrence held that the trial court erred in granting a blanket ruling against all of the defendants’ affirmative defenses, specifically holding that Horton does not apply to “all” affirmative defenses, only those that would have terminated litigation if asserted earlier.

The concurrence explained:

Footnote 11 was also noteworthy:

Final Note – The dissent argued for limiting the Horton doctrine to the issue of asserting the right to arbitration.

Housing Authority of the City of Yazoo City, Mississippi v. Billings, 2023-IA-00975-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the trial court’s order denying the Housing Authority’s motion for summary judgment on a breach of contract claim against it, holding that none of the alleged terms of the employment contract were contained in the Housing Authority board’s minutes, and rendering judgment in favor of the Housing Authority.
(9-0)

Gavin v. Evers, 2024-EC-00061-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in an election contest, holding that the trial court did not err in considering the motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment simultaneously, did not err in excluding an affidavit that was not based on the affiant’s personal knowledge, did not err in finding no genuine issue of material fact in the voting irregularities claim, did not err by finding that the prevailing candidate met the two-year residency requirement, and did not err in denying the motion for reconsideration and request for additional findings of fact and conclusions of law.
(9-0)

Dollar General Corporation v. Dobbs, 2023-IA-00617-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Reversing the county court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, holding that the trial court erred in finding the three-year statute of limitations applied where the complaint stated only a claim of defamation which is subject to a one-year statute of limitations.
(5-4)

Other Orders

  • Johnson v. State, 2022-CT-00665-SCT (denying cert)
  • Law Will and Testament of Prichard: Martin v. Arceneaux, 2022-CT-01035-SCT (denying cert)
  • Wilson v. State, 2023-CT-00070-SCT (dismissing pro se cert petition as untimely)
  • Wallace v. State, 2023-CT-00071-SCT (denying cert)
  • NCAA v. Farrar, 2023-IA-00282-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • In Re: Capitol Complex Improvement District Inferior Court, 2025-M-00007-SCT (granting motion to withdraw petition to adopt local rules of CCID Court)
  • In Re: Mississippi Rules of Evidence, 89-R-99002-SCT (granting motion to adopt Mississippi Rule of Evidence 807) Here is the text of the new rule:

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 25, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today and a bonus opinion Thursday of last week. There is a notably high reversal rate in these cases. The decision from last Thursday reversed a conviction of capital murder. The eight decisions handed down today cover personal injury, custody, divorce, felony convictions, wills and estates, and PCR with five of them at least reversing the trial court in part.

February 20, 2025

Roncali v. State, 2023-KA-00173-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of capital murder and remanding for a new trial, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict but that trial court abused its discretion allowing a State’s expert to testify that the manner of death was homicide from a third person injecting methamphetamine into the victim.
Expert Testimony: 8-2 (Carlton dissented as to this issue, joined by Barnes, Lawrence, and St. Pe’)
Sufficiency of the evidence: 8-2 (Carlton concurred as to this issue, joined by Barnes, Lawrence, and St. Pe’; Westbrooks dissented as to this issue, joined by McDonald and joined in party by McCarty who joined the principal opinion)

February 25, 2025

In the Matter of Disbursement of Real Property Assets to Heir and/or The Sale of Real Property: Montgomery v. Whatley, 2022-CP-00992-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing order permitting disbursement of real property one of the decedent’s children, holding that there was insufficient evidence in the record to support the chancellor’s finding that the decedent was the fee simple owner of the tract at issue and remanding to set aside the “Executrix’s Deed” and for further proceedings.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Lawrence did not participate)

Trehern v. Spivey, 2023-CA-01002-COA (Civil – Custody)
Reversing the chancellor’s custody modification order awarding the father legal and physical custody with no visitation awarded to the mother, holding that the chancellor did not find or identify any material change in circumstances, did not separately assess whether the change was adverse to the child’s welfare, and did not make on-the-record findings as to the Albright factors.
(10-0)

Crump v. State, 2023-CP-00795-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding it the motion untimely, successive, and barred by res judicata.
(10-0)

Fairchild v. KS Ocean Springs Real Estate LLC, 2023-CA-00928-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendants in a premises liability case, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in striking an affidavit supporting the plaintiff’s opposition as a discovery violation and did not err in finding that there was no evidence that the defendants had actual or constructive knowledge of a dangerous condition.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Black v. Black, 2023-CA-01098-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s order modifying custody in favor of the father, holding that the mother’s appeal of the modification judgment was not timely and therefore barred and that the trial court did not err in denying her relief from the judgment under Rule 60(b).
(10-0)

Practice Point – The Court noted that the Rule 60(b) motion filed more than ten days after the judgment does not toll the time for filing an appeal:

Colbert v. Colbert, 2022-CA-01293-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s decision denying the husband’s claim for divorce and granting the wife’s request for separate maintenance and child support, holding that the husband’s argument that the antenuptial agreement bars a grant of separate maintenance was procedurally barred for failure to present it to the trial court but reversing on the child support issue because the chancellor did not make the required findings of fact.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Star v. State, 2023-KA-00788-COA (Civil – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing/rendering in part after the defendant was convicted of aggravated assault and being a felon in possession of a weapon, holding that the indictment and jury instruction for felon in possession of a weapon were deficient for failing to include the elements and reversing the conviction of felon in possession, but holding that the trial court did not err regarding the aggravated assault jury instruction.
(7-2-1: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Barnes concurred in result only without writing; Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part)

Roberts v. Roberts, 2023-CA-00934-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s equitable division of the marital estate and award of alimony, holding that the chancellor erred in valuing the husband’s business and other assets which required remand on both the equitable division and alimony decisions.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Alexander v. Metropolitan Y.M.C.A., 20233-CP-01092-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Magee v. State, 2023-CP-00008-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Chung v. State, 2023-CA-00362-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Doukas v. Kiln Self Storage, 2023-WC-01195-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 17, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions in what appears to be the last slate of decisions from Mississippi’s appellate courts in 2024. There are two direct criminal appeals, three PCR cases, and a $1M+ personal injury verdict.

Williams v. State, 2023-KA-00346-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not admit inadmissible hearsay by allowing an officer to testify about limited information that guided his investigation and that State did not improperly comment on the defendant’s failure to testify.
(4-4-1: McCarty dissented, joined in part by Barnes, Wilson, McDonald, and Lawrence; Westbrooks did not participate)

Parker v. State, 2023-KA-00550-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of fourth-offense simple domestic violence, holding that the trial court erred in admitting affidavits containing facts about the defendant’s prior offenses but that the error was harmless, that the trial court did not err in admitting the victim’s prior statement through her probation officer, and that because there was just one harmless error the doctrine of cumulative error did not apply.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Lawson v. State, 2023-CP-01008-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s order denying a PCR motion, holding that there was no clear error or abuse of discretion.
(10-0)

Moore v. State, 2023-CP-01147-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR mtoion, holding that the claimant did not prove that his guilty plea was involuntary or that his counsel was ineffective.
(7-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Pilot Travel Centers, LLC v. Womack, 2023-CA-00035-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming a judgment after plaintiff’s jury verdict in a slip-and-fall case where the plaintiff slipped and fell on a collapsed wet-floor sign, holding that a reasonable jury could find that the collapsed wet-floor sign constituted an unreasonably or unusually dangerous condition and that the defendant had constructive knowledge of the condition, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion denying the motion for new trial that argued that expert testimony should not have been admitted, that the plaintiff’s attorney made improper statements during closing arguments, and that the non-economic damages (that the trial court reduced from $3M to $1M) was still excessive in light of the $393,000 award of compensatory damages.
(6-2-2: Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing; Emfinger concurred in result only without writing; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes and joined in party by Westbrooks)

Practice Point – The majority and the dissent agreed that the plaintiff’s “safety expert” should not have been allowed to testify as such.

Ball v. State, 2023-CP-00890-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of the claim for PCR, holding that the claimant waived his argument that his right to be free from Double Jeopardy.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by Barnes and McDonald)

Other Orders

  • None.

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of December 12, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions today. One ends a chapter in the NCAA-Ole Miss saga, one is an interesting case discussing administrative remedies exhaustion and exclusive remedy immunity under the MWCA, and the other is a direct criminal appeal reversing the Court of Appeals and reinstating a conviction.

NCAA v. Farrar, 2023-IA-00282-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of the NCAA’s motion for summary judgment, holding that there was no evidence in the record to support the plaintiff’s due process and malicious interference with employment claims.
(6-1: Randolph dissented dubitante; Coleman and Maxwell did not participate)

Harris v. Hemphill Construction Company, Inc., 2023-CA-00973-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the trial court’s decision dismissing a work-related personal injury claim by an employee/officer of a subcontractor against a general contractor, holding that the plaintiff was not required to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing a negligence suit but that the defendant-GC was entitled to exclusive remedy immunity from the plaintiff’s suit because the GC required the subcontractor to carry comp coverage and plaintiff was an officer of the subcontract who rejected workers’ comp coverage for himself.
(9-0)

Practice Point – This is case is worth a deeper dive:

Harris then filed the negligence lawsuit and the Mississippi Supreme Court held that the GC was entitled to exclusive remedy immunity:

The Court concluded:

Quinn v. State, 2022-CT-00962-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing the Court of Appeals and reinstating the circuit court’s judgment and conviction of sexual battery, holding that the State sufficiently proved venue, that expert DNA testimony was properly admitted, that the indictment was properly amended, that the trial court did not err by not granting a mistrial sua sponte during closing arguments, and that the trial court did nto err by allowing the State to use birth certificates to refresh a witness’s memory.
(7-2: Kitchens dissented, joined by King)

Other Orders

  • Howard v. State, 2022-KA-00430-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Crawford v. East Mississippi State Hospital, Inc., 2022-CT-00753-SCT (denying cert)
  • Course v. State, 2022-CT-00760-SCT (denying cert)
  • Collins v. Collins, 2022-CT-00903-SCT (denying cert)
  • McLellan v. McLellan, 2022-CT-01006-SCT (denying cert)
  • McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2022-CT-01175-SCT (denying cert)
  • Designer Custom Homes, LLC v. U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies, LLC, 2023-CT-00207-SCT (denying cert)
  • Deep South Today v. Bryant, 2024-M-00659-SCT (denying petition for interloc)
  • McPhail v. McPhail, 2024-TS-00849 (denying motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissing bond-related request without prejudice, and granting request to enlarge the notice of appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 3, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. It was a big day for real property and wills. There are also two criminal appeals, an MTCA personal injury case, and a PCR case.

Pham v. Miner, 2023-CA-00266-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision in a dispute over ownership of a parcel, holding that the chancellor erred in finding that a deed was defective and subject to interpretation with parol evidence and further that the chancellor failed to make a specific ruling on the adverse possession claim.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Estate of Forkner: Berry v. Forkner, 2023-CA-00707-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings related to the construction of a holographic will, holding that the chancellor did not err in admitting the will to probate, in finding that real property should pass by intestate succession, or in awarding personal property to one party, but reversing and remanding the issue of attorney’s fees for the chancellor’s failure to apply the McKee factors with supporting findings.
(8-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Lewis v. State, 2023-CP-01109-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary denial of PRC motion, holding that it was time-barred without applicable exception.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Booth v. State, 2023-KA-00906-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding after review of Lindsey brief and the record that there are no arguable issues on appeal.
(10-0)

Lucas v. State, 2023-KA-01015-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of malicious mischief, holding that malicious mischief is not a lesser-included offense of the indicted offense of burglary of a dwelling.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in part and in result without writing)

Smith v. Anderson, 2022-CA-00959-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a dispute among cousins over 159 acres, holding that the chancellor did not err in dismissing a counterclaim of adverse possession or in “failing to address” affirmative defenses that were not pursued, and that an issue not raised in the chancery court was waived on appeal.
(10-0)

Berry v. Jackson County, 2023-CA-00643-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the County in an MTCA suit stemming from a collision with a suspect who was fleeing law enforcement, holding that the plaintiff did not present evidence that the County acted in reckless disregard of her safety.
(5-3-0: Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; Lawrence and Smith did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Hyland v. State, 2023-CA-00256-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Aldridge v. South Tippah County School District, 2023-CA-00418-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Estate of Johnson: Manners v. Estate of Johnson, 2023-CA-00823-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 12, 2024 (and one from November 7)

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions today: one MTCA personal injury case, one direct criminal appeal, and one claim against the parole board. The Court also handed down one opinion on Thursday of last week in a direct criminal appeal.

Alexander v. State, 2023-KA-00331-COA (Criminal – Felony) (Nov. 7, 2024)
Affirming conviction of six counts of exploitation of a child and sentence to forty-years for each court to run consecutively, holding (Part One) that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to sever the six counts of child exploitation; the trial court did not err in denying a generic motion to exclude prior bad acts or in ruling on subsequent objections to testimony of prior bad acts during trial; the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s objections during trial to opening statement comments, to questions during various witness examinations, or to the introduction of a photographs of the defendant and a victims; the trial court did not err in denying a motion for mistrial after a witness mentioned conduct related to one of the severed counts; (Part Two) there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction; the verdicts were not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence; and the sentence was not grossly disproportionate to the crimes.
As to Part One, 8-1: McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Carlton did not participate.
As to Part Two, 6-1-2: Wilson concurred in result only; Emfinger dissented in part, joined by Barnes; Carlton did not participate.

Allred v. Tishomingo County, 2023-CA-00569-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming judgment in favor of the County after an MTCA bench trial in a personal injury action that arose after a limb fell on the roof of the plaintiffs’ vehicle, holding that the County had no statutory duty to inspect or maintain the right-of-way, that the County had no actual or constructive notice that the tree was a dangerous condition, that the County did not proximately cause the damages, that the trial court’s analysis of expert testimony was not mainfestly wrong or clearly erroneous, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion admitting opinions from the County’s expert.
(10-0)

PRACTICE POINT– The County moved to strike the plaintiffs’ reply brief or portions of it on the grounds that it referenced materials that were not designated as part of the record on appeal. The Court denied the motion to strike as moot because it declined to consider the documents that were not in the record on appeal pursuant to M.R.A.P. 10 and 30(a).

Walker v. State, 2023-KA-00860-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of statutory rape, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress the interrogation video where the defendant argued his statement was improperly obtained after he requested counsel because the defendant did not actually invoke his Sixth Amendment right to counsel with regard to the charged offense, holding that the confession was voluntary, and holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-1-0: McCarty concurred in result only without writing)

Siggers v. Mississippi Parole Board, 2023-CP-00900-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of the petitioner’s “show cause motion” seeking the compel the Parole Board to show case as to why his parole was denied and was not set for hearing until 2025, holding that the trial court correctly determined that it lack authority to review the parole board’s decision to deny parole and set off the parole hearing.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

  • Scott v. State, 2022-KA-00830-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Morland v. Morland, 2023-CA-00237-COA (granting appellee’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees)
  • Weeks v. Weeks, 2023-CA-00427-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Walker v. Hasty, 2023-CA-00675-COA (denying motion for appellate attorney’s fees)
  • Corr Properties, LLC v. Proctor, 2023-CA-00782-COA (granting motion for appellate attorney’s fees)
  • Miller v. State, 2023-CP-00812-COA (dismissing motion for rehearing as untimely)
  • Thadison v. State, 2024-TS-00389-COA (granting pro se motion to recall mandate and reinstate appeal)
  • Mallett v. State, 2024-TS-01091-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as appellant’s response to show-cause notice was well taken)
  • Rodgers v. State, 2024-TS-01116-COA (suspending deadline to appeal pursuant to M.R.A.P. 2(c) and allowing appeal to proceed)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 5, 2024 and Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 7, 2024

In what was certainly the biggest new story from Tuesday, the Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions. Today, the Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion and one order amending the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure. You can read about all below.

Mississippi Court of Appeals – November 5, 2024

Patton v. State, 2023-CP-00618-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the motion was successive and untimely with no available exceptions and that the motion was meritless.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Slade v. City of Lumberton, 2023-CA-00830-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a MTCA personal injury case stemming from a police pursuit, holding that the trial court did not err in finding no reckless disregard based on the undisputed facts and that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to recuse based on the judge’s prior representation of the City.
(6-3: McDonald dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty; Weddle did not participate)

McDill v. Scott County School District, 2023-CA-00956-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing summary judgment in an MTCA case stemming from a student’s weightlifting injury at school, holding that the school district was not entitled to discretionary-function immunity.
(10-0)

The University of Mississippi Medical Center v. Redd, 2023-CA-00711-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming a bench trial verdict of $500,000 in a med mal case, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings that the doctor breached the standard of care by not ordering lab work or further testing which, in turn, would have revealed the infection and prevented the amputation, and holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony of an orthopedic surgeon who primarily practiced in a different subspecialty than the treating doctor.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Morgan v. Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi, 2023-CA-00379-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a personal injury case where the plaintiff was struck by poolside cushions blowing in the wind while she was closing out her tab at the swim-up bar, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that they cushions were not an unreasonably dangerous condition and that there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant.
(7-3: Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald and Lawrence)

Other Orders

  • Sinquefield v. The City of Ridgeland, 2022-CA-01276-COA (denying rehearing)
  • In Re Estate of Warren: Warren v. Maharrey, 2023-CA-00438-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court – November 7, 2024

Childress v. State, 2023-KA-01323-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of it.
(9-0)

Other Orders

  • In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (amending M.R.C.P. 62 – the order states that the amendment is effective 30 days after the date of the order which was entered on October 31, 2024)

Here are the amendments to Rule 62 (subsections (c) through (h) were not altered):

  • Mississippi State University v. Zhang, 2024-M-00344-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Hertz Jackson Three, LLC v. Sanders, 2024-M-00497-SCT (denying interloc)
  • Mississippi Baptist Medical Center, Inc. v. Butler, 2024-M-00930-SCT (denying interloc)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of October 17, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions today. There is a petition for back pay from reinstated utility commissioners, a reversal of a personal injury verdict in Madison County because the trial court abused its discretion admitting expert testimony, an appeal of the denial of a motion for remittitur/new trial after plaintiff’s verdict in a contract case, and a direct appeal of a drug possession conviction.

Slaughter v. City of Canton, 2023-CA-01102-SCT Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a petition of former commissioners of the Canton Municipal Utilities Commission seeking back pay, holding that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction after the case became final upon issuance of the mandate affirming the circuit court’s prior reinstatement of the commissioners.
(9-0)

Scarborough v. Logan, 2022-CA-00965-SCT consolidated with 2023-CA-00720-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing on cross-appeal a plaintiff’s verdict in a personal injury case, holding that the trial court abuse its discretion by allowing expert testimony from a witness who was never qualified or tendered as an expert witness and dismissing the direct appeal issues as moot.
(9-0)

Stribling Equipment, LLC v. Eason Propane, LLC, 2023-CA-00862-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the trial court’s decision denying a new damages trial and/or remittitur, holding that the amount of damages was high but not shocking and was supported by the evidence.
(9-0)

Vivian v. State, 2023-KA-00338-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of felony possession of meth and misdemeanor possession of marijuana, holding that there were no errors wanting reversal based on counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(9-0)

Other Orders

  • Roley v. Roley, 2022-CT-01104-SCT (dismissing petition for cert)
  • Nettles v. Nettles, 2023-CT-00041-SCT (granting cert)

Hand Down Page