Premises Liability – Mississippi Appeals Blog

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of May 15 and May 22, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions between last week and this week. One of today’s cases reversed the 12(b)(6) dismissal of a third-party-assault premises case in the face of the Landowners Protection Act that just might end up stirring the premises liability pot. There is also an interesting champerty decision answering a certified question from the Fifth Circuit.

May 15, 2025

Crabtree v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company, 2024-FC-00827-SCT (Civil – Federally Certified Question)
Answering a certified quest from the Fifth Circuit, holding that Miss. Code Ann. § 97-9-11 (Rev. 2020) prohibits a disinterested third party engaged by a bankruptcy creditor from purchasing a cause of action from a debtor’s estate.
(5-4)

Other Orders

In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (granting rules committee’s motion to withdraw motion to amend Rule 7)
Chamberlin v. State, 2022-DR-00546-SCT (denying successor petition for PCR)
Short v. The Break Land Company, LLC, 2022-CT-01180-SCT (denying cert)
Carr v. State, 2023-DR-00503-SCT (directing Anthony Carr to notify the Court within 30 days of the federal district court’s ruling on the State’s motion; and that, until the federal district court rules on the motion to lift stay, Carr is directed to submit every 90 days from the entry of this order a status report on the posture of the federal case)

Hand Down Page

May 22, 2025

In the Matter of the Estate of Tatum: Haynie v. Estate of Tatum, 2023-CA-01366-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Dismissing appeal as moot, holding that a decision on the chancery court’s rulings involving the public sale of a one-half interest in a land and cattle company would be of no practical benefit to the appellant because the United States will receive any additional funds over and above what the appellant has already received.
(9-0)

Doby v. South Park Village Apartments, 2023-CA-01094-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of a personal injury, holding that under the state’s notice pleading standard the complaint sufficiently pleaded a negligence claim against an apartment complex after one of the plaintiffs was shot on the premises, but affirming dismissal as to the other plaintiff because the complaint contained no allegations as to him.
(9-0)

Practice Point – This is an fascinating result in an area of premises liability seems to have been gutted by the Landowners Protection Act that became law in 2019:

Other Orders

Harris v. State, 2023-CT-00460-SCT (denying cert)
Dollar General Corporation v. Dobbs, 2023-IA-00617-SCT (denying rehearing)
Lenoir v. State, 2023-IA-01181-SCT (denying rehearing)
Doukas v. Kiln Self Storage, 2023-CT-01195-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 13 and May 20, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions last week and a hearty eleven today. There are some interesting cases in the mix and a summary of each is below.

May 13, 2025

May v. May, 2023-CA-01022-COA, consolidated with 2023-M-01401-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Vacating the chancellor’s order of contempt for failure to pay child support but affirming his denial of the motion to recuse, holding that the chancery court did not have personal jurisdiction for purposes of a contempt ruling for want of service under Rule 81, but that although the chancellor erred in finding that the motion for recusal was untimely it was nevertheless within his discretion to deny it.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in result only without writing)

Fortner v. IMS Engineers, Inc., 2023-CA-01170-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a company that had been engaged to oversee and manage road improvement projects until about ten months before a fatal accident occurred, holding that there was no evidence that the company owed a duty of care once its involvement ended and the City took over the management role.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Carlton did not participate)

Horne v. Dolgencorp LLC, 2024-CA-00376-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a trip-and-fall case after a customer tripped on merchandise in an aisle, holding that there was no evidence that the store had actual or constructive knowledge of the presence of the dangerous condition.
(8-2: Westbrooks and McDonald dissented without writing)

Shipley v. Shipley, 2023-CA-00814-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming judgment modifying the custody arrangement by giving the mother sole physical and legal custody, holding that the chancellor did not err in modifying physical and legal custody based the mother’s relocation to Oregon, that the chancellor’s did not err by failing to consider the totality of the circumstances, that the chancellor did not give undue weight to one Albright factor, and that the argument that the chancellor erred by not sua sponte appointing a GAL to investigate allegations of abuse was procedurally barred, and declining to address child support in after ruling that the chancellor did not err in its custody decision.
(7-3: Wilson dissented, joined by Carlton and Emfinger)

Magyar v. Shiers, 2023-CA-00682-COA (Torts – Other)
Affirming bench trial decision finding the defendant liable for malicious prosecution and awarding compensatory and punitive damages, holding that there was evidence to support each element of malicious prosecution where the defendant had filed charging affidavits against the plaintiffs alleging that they were intentionally damaging his property by allowing sewage from a leaking septic system to run into his property but the justice court dismissed the charges for lack of evidence.
(10-0)

Mueller Industries, Inc. v. Waits, 2023-WC-00494-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Reversing the Commission’s decision ordering a lump sum payment, holding that the information in the record did not permit the Court to review the Commission’s computations of TPD and remanding for the Commission to determine whether TPD was properly calculated and credited, determine whether the claimant received more than the maximum weekly benefit and whether the Employer/Carrier should receive a credit for overpayment, and ensure that the Employer/Carrier was not charged with penalties or interest after the date the Commission found that no further benefits were owed.
(8-2: Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald and joined in part by McCarty)

Other Orders

Mount v. State, 2023-KA-00807-COA (denying rehearing)
Begnaud v. Begnaud, 2023-CA-00822-COA (denying rehearing)
In the Matter of Estate of Tate: Garfield v. Tate, 2023-CA-01262-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

May 20, 2025

Mask v. Baggett, 2024-CA-00181-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decisions denying a motion for contempt and attorney’s fees in a divorce action for lack of proof, holding that the chancellor’s finding that neither party had sufficient proof to support motions for contempt and attorney’s fees was supported by the record and lack of record, that the appellant failed to show that the chancellor abused his discretion by denying the Rule 59 motion due to clear error or manifest injustice.
(10-0)

Bickes v. Swain, 2024-CA-00187-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the mother of the bride and the venue in a premises liability suit filed by a wedding guest who hurt his leg stepping off a porch at the venue, holding that the circuit court did not err in granting summary judgment without conducting a hearing that had been set and that summary judgment was proper because there was no evidence of a dangerous condition that could support liability regardless of whether the plaintiff was classified as a licensee or an invitee.
(7-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Page v. State, 2024-CP-00613-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s rejection of the plaintiff’s motion for discovery in the circuit court in which he was convicted of attacking a woman with a knife two decades ago, holding that the circuit court did not err in rejecting the claim as a standalone claim separate from a PCR petition though the circuit court incorrectly “denied” the motion instead of “dismissing” the motion for lack of personal jurisdiction.
(10-0)

Jones v. State, 2023-KA-01157-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of armed robbery, holding that the circuit court did not commit plain error in excluding evidence of a witness’s prior convictions because the weight of evidence of guilt was overwhelming, that the Miranda violation arguments were procedurally barred and did not merit reversal under the plain error doctrine.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Pickett v. State, 2024-KA-00511-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of burglary of a dwelling with intent to commit a larceny, holding that the issue of the circuit court’s denial of the motions for directed verdict was procedurally barred and lacked merit because the evidence was sufficient and the verdict not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and the circuit court did not err in denying the motions without making specific findings of fact.
(10-0)

Mortera v. Kona Villa Owners Association, Inc., 2023-CA-01297-COA (Civil – Property Damage)
Reversing summary judgment that was entered in favor of an HOA that declined to pursue a property damage claim on behalf of a condo unit owner, holding that based on the bylaws and insurance policy terms there was a genuine fact dispute over the HOA’s status of a fiduciary.
(9-0)

Parrott v. Frierson, 2023-SA-01245-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s dismissal of taxpayers’ petition appealing the Board of Tax Appeals’ order, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the chancellor’s finding that “yard sales” where the taxpayers purchased storage units and sold the contents were not isolated, casual, or occasional sales but sales made in the course of business and subject to sales tax, that the chancellor did not err in finding that the MDOR’s income tax assessment was prima facie correct, that the taxpayers did not overcome the presumption of correctness, and that the chancellor properly affirmed assessment of penalties and interest.
(10-0)

Forrest County General Hospital v. Knight, 2023-WC-01277-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the Commission’s order that affirmed the AJ’s order that the claimant suffered an 80% industrial loss of use of the right leg and reducing it to 60% due to apportionment but reversed the AJ’s finding of no loss of wage-earning capacity and awarded 15% LWEC for the low back injury, holding that under the deferential standard of review there was evidence to support the Commission’s decision.
(10-0)

Roach v. Roach, 2024-CA-00236-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s denial of the ex-wife’s Rule 60(b) motion after the ex-husband was granted a divorce on the grounds of habitual cruel and inhumane treatment, holding that the chancery court did not err in finding that service of process by certified mail was proper and that the ex-wife failed to show exceptional circumstances related to her claim that her prior attorney was ineffective warranting relief under Rule 60(b).
(10-0)

Allen & Smith Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Merrill, 2023-CA-00468-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming summary judgment granted in favor of a former employee in a breach of contract claim alleging violations of a non-compete agreement, holding that the court had appellate jurisdiction even though the judgment did not include the language “no just reason for delay” and that the circuit court did not err in finding certain provisions ambiguous and striking them from the agreement.
(5-5: Carlton and Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes, and McCarty and joined in party by Carlton and Emfinger)

NOTE – I hope this one goes up on cert. My impression is that the holding of the principal opinion would relax the Rule 54(b) standard as it has been enforced. In the meantime, I would not stop putting all of the Rule 54(b) magic language in your judgments.

Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2024-CA-00455-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing summary judgment in favor of the defendant based on judicial estoppel after the plaintiff failed to disclose this personal injury claim in her bankruptcy proceedings, holding that the “acceptance” element of judicial estoppel was not met where the bankruptcy as dismissed without a discharge.
(8-2: Emfinger dissented, joined by Wilson)

Other Orders

Culbertson v. State, 2023-KA-00588-COA (denying rehearing)
Boone v. State, 2023-KA-00684-COA (denying rehearing)
Gibson v. State, 2023-KA-00704-COA (denying rehearing)
Grimes v. State, 2023-KA-01254-COA (denying rehearing)
Burnette v. State, 2023-CP-01330-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of May 8, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion in a dog-bite case on interlocutory appeal. The Court also entered an order setting an execution date in a capital case.

TLM Investments, LLC v. Yates, 2024-IA-00204-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing the circuit court’s denial of summary judgment in a dog-bite case, holding that the plaintiff did not come forward with evidence that the property owner/lessor had actual or constructive knowledge of a tenant’s dog or of its dangerous propensities or that the plaintiff was an intended third-party beneficiary of the lease agreement.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Jordan v. State, 1998-DP-00901-SCT (granting motion to set execution date)
Shoemaker v. State, 2019-M-00832 (denying application for leave to proceed in the trial court, finding the motion frivolous, and restricting the petitioner from filing further PCR petitions in forma pauperis)
Magee v. State, 2023-CT-00008-SCT (denying cert)
Howell v. State, 2023-CT-00265-SCT (denying cert)
Cauthen v. State, 2023-CT-00589-SCT (denying cert)
Walker v. State, 2023-KA-01153-SCT (denying rehearing)
Jordan v. State, 2024-DR-01272-SCT (denying motion for leave to file PCR motion)
Jordan v. State, 2024-DR-01272-SCT (denying State’s motion to dismiss fifth PCR petition and denying defendant’s motion to strike)
Timmons v. State, 2025-M-00057 (granting leave to file motion for PCR)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 8, 15, and 22, 2025

After a few weeks of attending to other matters, I am back on the blogging horse. Fortunately, the appellate courts went relatively light on me in terms of the number of decisions handed down.

Summaries the hand downs from the Mississippi Court of Appeals from the past three weeks are below. There are several divorce cases, three mal cases (two opinions reached different results after the respective plaintiff’s expert testimony was struck), several MTCA cases, personal injury cases, felonies, an arbitration case, and more.

April 8, 2025

McFall v. Osborne, 2023-CA-01234-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a divorce action denying the ex-husband’s Rule 60(b) motion attacking the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, holding that the chancellor had subject matter jurisdiction, that the ex-husband could not attack the merits of the underlying judgment because it was not appealed in time, and that the chancellor did not err in finding the ex-husband in contempt for failing to pay as ordered in the underlying judgment.
(9-0: Westbrooks did not participate)

Estate of Boleware v. McPhail, 2024-CA-00156-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming with modification the circuit court’s decision staying litigation and compelling arbitration, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the arbitration agreement was valid but modifying the judgment to clarify that the arbitrator must decide whether the claims are within the scope of the arbitration agreement.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in the result without writing)

Short v. Polles, 2023-CA-00607-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of a farmer’s suit against MDWFP for issuing a permit permitting the farmer to kill deer to protect his soybean field but limiting it to does only, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the agency was immune from suit because permit decisions were within the agency’s power and its actions were not arbitrary and capricious.
(8-2-0: Barnes and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

Brooks v. State, 2023-KA-01081-COA (granting pro se motion for time to file motion for rehearing)
Bridget v. State, 2025-TS-00100-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of appealable judgment)

Hand Down Page

April 15, 2025

E. Cornell Malone Corp. v. Marshall Cnty. Sch. Dist., 2024-CA-00047-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of a complaint against the County related to a construction project, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the tort claims were barred by the MTCA’s one-year statute of limitations or in denying the motion to amend the complaint.
(9-1-0: Carlton dissented without separate written opinion)

Anderson v. State, 2023-KA-00967-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of murder, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Pinkton v. State, 2024-CP-00655-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the claims were time-barred, waived, and without merit.
(6-4-0: McCarty concurred, joined by Wilson, Emfinger, and Weddle)

Goodson v. State, 2023-KA-00729-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress, in granting the State’s motion in limine preventing the defendant from raising the defense of bias against by the sheriff’s department, or in denying his motion for JNOV or for new trial.
(10-0)

Jordan v. State, 2023-KA-00965-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of shooting into a dwelling after reviewing the record and counsel’s Lindsey brief, holding that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and no issues warranting reversal.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Holifield v. Highland Community Hospital, 2023-CA-01342-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming dismissal of MTCA claims against a community hospital, holding that the trial court did not err in determining that the community hospital was a division of a governmental entity and not a separate entity that could be sued or in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend to substitute the correct governmental entity because the claim would be time-barred.
(7-3-0: Wilson, McDonald, and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Lee v. Doolittle, 2023-CA-00969-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Reversing summary judgment in favor of the defendants in a med mal case, holding that the circuit court abused its discretion in striking the plaintiff’s expert and then in granting summary judgment for lack of expert testimony.
(5-1-4: Wilson concurred in part and in the judgment without writing; Carlton dissented, joined by Barnes, Emfinger, and St. Pe’)

Other Orders

Miller v. State, 2023-CP-00322-COA (denying rehearing)
Estate of Forkner: Berry v. Forkner, 2023-CA-00707-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

April 22, 2025

Nabors v. State, 2024-KA-00006-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault of law enforcement, holding that there was sufficient evidence of the defendant’s intent to commit aggravated assault, that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not commit plain error in giving a flight instruction, and that trial counsel was not ineffective.
(10-0)

Crocker v. Daves, 2023-CA-00602-COA (Civil – Custody)
Dismissing appeal in a custody matter, holding that the chancellor’s order holding child support in abeyance due to insufficient information before the court to award child support based on statutory guidelines was not a final, appealable order.
(10-0)

Elmore v. Elmore, 2023-CA-00875-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming a judgment granting divorce and dividing marital property, holding that the chancellor did not err in classifying assets as marital property, in determining what property was marital property or in equitably distributing marital assets, or in denying the motion for new trial or to alter or amend the judgment.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and dissented in part; St. Pe’ did not participate)

Mallery v. State, 2024-CP-00220-COA (Civil – PCR)
Dismissing appeal of PCR denial, holding that there was no longer an actual controversy since the petitioner had been released from custody.
(9-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Simmons v. City of Picayune, 2024-CA-00092-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment dismissing a premises liability claim stemming from a fall on a handicap ramp, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact that the curb ramp constituted a dangerous condition.
(10-0)

Cox v. Coast 132 LLC, 2023-CA-01290-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a restaurant in a slip-and-fall case, holding that the windowsill that allegedly caused the fall was not a dangerous condition and that even if it was a dangerous condition the plaintiff could not prove that the restaurant created it or had actual or constructive knowledge of it.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Sandlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 2023-CP-01347-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming dismissal of a pro se UM claim, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the defendant had not been properly served with process and that the statute of limitations on the claim had run.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Younger v. Southern, 2022-CA-01228-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming part and reversing in part the circuit court’s judgment after a bench trial in a personal injury claim under the MTCA, affirming the award for the loss of the plaintiff’s truck, but reversing the award of damages for past, present, and future pain and suffering and reversing the award of $21,120 in medical damages for lack of expert testimony and rendering an award of $399 for past medical expenses.
(7-3: Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald and McCarty; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty)

Calvin-Williams v. The Greenville Clinic, P.A., 2023-CA-01021-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, holding that the circuit court did not err in striking portions of the plaintiff’s expert’s testimony and then granting summary judgment based on the lack of expert testimony.
(8-2: McDonald dissented, joined by Westbrooks)

Other Orders

Parker v. State, 2023-KA-00550-COA (denying rehearing)
Estate of Roberts: Herd v. Stokes, 2023-CA-00713-COA (denying rehearing)
Gardner v. State, 2023-KA-00903-COA (denying rehearing)
Lawson v. State, 2023-CP-01008-COA (denying rehearing)
Jack v. City of Meridian, 2023-CC-01339-COA (denying pro se motion to recall mandate and dismissing motion for rehearing and amended motion for rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 25, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today and a bonus opinion Thursday of last week. There is a notably high reversal rate in these cases. The decision from last Thursday reversed a conviction of capital murder. The eight decisions handed down today cover personal injury, custody, divorce, felony convictions, wills and estates, and PCR with five of them at least reversing the trial court in part.

February 20, 2025

Roncali v. State, 2023-KA-00173-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of capital murder and remanding for a new trial, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict but that trial court abused its discretion allowing a State’s expert to testify that the manner of death was homicide from a third person injecting methamphetamine into the victim.
Expert Testimony: 8-2 (Carlton dissented as to this issue, joined by Barnes, Lawrence, and St. Pe’)
Sufficiency of the evidence: 8-2 (Carlton concurred as to this issue, joined by Barnes, Lawrence, and St. Pe’; Westbrooks dissented as to this issue, joined by McDonald and joined in party by McCarty who joined the principal opinion)

February 25, 2025

In the Matter of Disbursement of Real Property Assets to Heir and/or The Sale of Real Property: Montgomery v. Whatley, 2022-CP-00992-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing order permitting disbursement of real property one of the decedent’s children, holding that there was insufficient evidence in the record to support the chancellor’s finding that the decedent was the fee simple owner of the tract at issue and remanding to set aside the “Executrix’s Deed” and for further proceedings.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Lawrence did not participate)

Trehern v. Spivey, 2023-CA-01002-COA (Civil – Custody)
Reversing the chancellor’s custody modification order awarding the father legal and physical custody with no visitation awarded to the mother, holding that the chancellor did not find or identify any material change in circumstances, did not separately assess whether the change was adverse to the child’s welfare, and did not make on-the-record findings as to the Albright factors.
(10-0)

Crump v. State, 2023-CP-00795-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding it the motion untimely, successive, and barred by res judicata.
(10-0)

Fairchild v. KS Ocean Springs Real Estate LLC, 2023-CA-00928-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendants in a premises liability case, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in striking an affidavit supporting the plaintiff’s opposition as a discovery violation and did not err in finding that there was no evidence that the defendants had actual or constructive knowledge of a dangerous condition.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Black v. Black, 2023-CA-01098-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s order modifying custody in favor of the father, holding that the mother’s appeal of the modification judgment was not timely and therefore barred and that the trial court did not err in denying her relief from the judgment under Rule 60(b).
(10-0)

Practice Point – The Court noted that the Rule 60(b) motion filed more than ten days after the judgment does not toll the time for filing an appeal:

Colbert v. Colbert, 2022-CA-01293-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s decision denying the husband’s claim for divorce and granting the wife’s request for separate maintenance and child support, holding that the husband’s argument that the antenuptial agreement bars a grant of separate maintenance was procedurally barred for failure to present it to the trial court but reversing on the child support issue because the chancellor did not make the required findings of fact.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Star v. State, 2023-KA-00788-COA (Civil – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing/rendering in part after the defendant was convicted of aggravated assault and being a felon in possession of a weapon, holding that the indictment and jury instruction for felon in possession of a weapon were deficient for failing to include the elements and reversing the conviction of felon in possession, but holding that the trial court did not err regarding the aggravated assault jury instruction.
(7-2-1: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Barnes concurred in result only without writing; Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part)

Roberts v. Roberts, 2023-CA-00934-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s equitable division of the marital estate and award of alimony, holding that the chancellor erred in valuing the husband’s business and other assets which required remand on both the equitable division and alimony decisions.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Other Orders

Alexander v. Metropolitan Y.M.C.A., 20233-CP-01092-COA (denying rehearing)
Magee v. State, 2023-CP-00008-COA (denying rehearing)
Chung v. State, 2023-CA-00362-COA (denying rehearing)
Doukas v. Kiln Self Storage, 2023-WC-01195-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 17, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions in what appears to be the last slate of decisions from Mississippi’s appellate courts in 2024. There are two direct criminal appeals, three PCR cases, and a $1M+ personal injury verdict.

Williams v. State, 2023-KA-00346-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not admit inadmissible hearsay by allowing an officer to testify about limited information that guided his investigation and that State did not improperly comment on the defendant’s failure to testify.
(4-4-1: McCarty dissented, joined in part by Barnes, Wilson, McDonald, and Lawrence; Westbrooks did not participate)

Parker v. State, 2023-KA-00550-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of fourth-offense simple domestic violence, holding that the trial court erred in admitting affidavits containing facts about the defendant’s prior offenses but that the error was harmless, that the trial court did not err in admitting the victim’s prior statement through her probation officer, and that because there was just one harmless error the doctrine of cumulative error did not apply.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Lawson v. State, 2023-CP-01008-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s order denying a PCR motion, holding that there was no clear error or abuse of discretion.
(10-0)

Moore v. State, 2023-CP-01147-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR mtoion, holding that the claimant did not prove that his guilty plea was involuntary or that his counsel was ineffective.
(7-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Pilot Travel Centers, LLC v. Womack, 2023-CA-00035-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming a judgment after plaintiff’s jury verdict in a slip-and-fall case where the plaintiff slipped and fell on a collapsed wet-floor sign, holding that a reasonable jury could find that the collapsed wet-floor sign constituted an unreasonably or unusually dangerous condition and that the defendant had constructive knowledge of the condition, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion denying the motion for new trial that argued that expert testimony should not have been admitted, that the plaintiff’s attorney made improper statements during closing arguments, and that the non-economic damages (that the trial court reduced from $3M to $1M) was still excessive in light of the $393,000 award of compensatory damages.
(6-2-2: Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing; Emfinger concurred in result only without writing; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes and joined in party by Westbrooks)

Practice Point – The majority and the dissent agreed that the plaintiff’s “safety expert” should not have been allowed to testify as such.

Ball v. State, 2023-CP-00890-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of the claim for PCR, holding that the claimant waived his argument that his right to be free from Double Jeopardy.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by Barnes and McDonald)

Other Orders

None.

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 22 and October 29, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions last week and seven this week. You can read summaries of the lot below.

October 22, 2024

Hampton v. State, 2023-KA-00068-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of first-degree murder and using a firearm during the commission of a felony, but vacating the consecutive five-year sentence for using a firearm during the commission of a felony where he was also sentenced to life.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Baur v. Ribelin, 2023-CA-00018-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming on direct and cross appeal in an adverse possession action, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying the claim for adverse possession or in confirming title in the rightful owner.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Johnson v. SW Gaming LLC, 2023-CA-00505-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the circuit court’s decisions granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment in an inadequate security case, holding that the evidence was not sufficient to establish an atmosphere of violence or actual or constructive knowledge that the assailant was a violent person and the evidence was not sufficient to establish garden variety negligence.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

In the Interest of A.R.H., a Minor: Malone v. Jackson County Dept. of Child Protection Services, 2023-CA-00420-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the youth court’s custody order, holding that the youth court was in its discretion to find aggravated circumstances warranting bypassing reasonable efforts for reunification and that there were no evidentiary errors.
(5-4: Wilson and Westbrooks dissented without writing; McDonnald dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty)

October 29, 2024

Banks v. Banks, 2023-CA-00515-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Dismissing appeal for want of an appealable judgment.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Ware v. State, 2023-CP-00909-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary denial of PCR motion, holding that the motion was time-barred and successive.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Morland v. Morland, 2023-CA-00237-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that it was in the child’s best interest to be in the mother’s exclusive custody subject to visitation, in calculation and award of child support to the mother, or in awarding the mother attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Mallard v. State, 2023-CP-01155-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the petitioner could not duck the successive petitions bar by proving any exceptions.
(7-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Sessums v. Chicken Nugget, Inc., 2023-CA-00128-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a premises liability case where the plaintiff tripped over two parking curbs, holding that the plaintiff did not come forward with evidence to prove that two abutting parking curbs created an unreasonably dangerous condition.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Scott v. State, 2023-KA-00559-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of child abuse and conviction of life imprisonment without eligibility for parole for a father who abused his infant child, holding (1) that the admission of the father’s prior conviction for failure to register as a sex offender was not reversible error though it was error to refer to it as “failure to register as a sex offender” instead of “failure to register” which was the actual language in the prior sentencing order, (2) that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, and (3) the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(4-5-0: Wilson and Smith concur in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks, McDonald, and Lawrence concur in result only without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Tisdale v. South Central Regional Medical Center, 2023-CA-00231-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming dismissal for failure prosecute, holding that the trial court did not err in reviewing the motion under Rule 41(b) instead of Rule 37, did not miscalculate the delay and correctly found clear delay with no activity occurring to advance the case to judgment in over two years, and did not abuse its discretion in determining that anything less than a dismissal would be unjust.
(6-3: McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Lawrence dissented, joined by McCarty, and joined in part by McDonald)

NOTE – The dissent argued that the majority discounted the impact of COVID.

Other Orders

October 22, 2024

Weatherly v. Weatherly, 2022-CA-00804-COA (denying rehearing)
Signaigo v. Grinstead, 2022-CA-01212-COA (denying rehearing)
Jackson v. State, 2023-KA-00201-COA (denying rehearing)
Neal v. Cain, 2023-CP-00625-COA (denying rehearing)
Washington v. State, 2024-CP-00059-COA (granting pro se motion to recall mandate and accept untimely brief)

October 29, 2024

Wilson v. State, 2023-CA-00070-COA (denying rehearing)
Shanks v. State, 2023-CP-00271-COA (denying rehearing)
Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00636-COA (denying rehearing)
Bradley v. State, 2023-CP-0764-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page – October 22, 2024

Hand Down Page – October 29, 2024

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 17, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions on this Constitution Day. There is something for just about everyone but PCR enthusiasts. Today’s opinions include personal injury cases, divorce cases, a real property case, an arbitration-award confirmation case, a youth court case, and a direct criminal appeal.

Franks v. Franks, 2023-CA-00088-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming final judgment of divorce, holding that the chancellor did not err in diving the martial home and ordering the husband to sell his portion to the wife where the husband agreed to do so, did not penalize the husband for embezzlement that occurred at his business but did not abuse her discretion in finding the husband’s adulterous relationship with the embezzler relevant in the Ferguson analysis, did not abuse her discretion in weighing the valuations of the marital property, did not abuse her discretion in awarding the wife attorney’s fees, did not abuse her discretion in not crediting the husband for payments made toward the marital home after the date of demarcation when he received the benefit of living in the home, and did not err in determining the amount of child support.
(8-0: Carlton did not participate)

Zemek v. Gunn, 2023-CA-00833-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s order denying a continuance and confirming an arbitration award, holding that the defendant waived the issue of timeliness and that, in any event, the confirmation petition was timely and that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in denying a continuance.
(9-0)

Fox v. Allen Automotive, Inc., 2023-CA-00441-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing summary judgment in favor of a car dealership in a premises liability action, holding that the trial court erred in finding that the plaintiff exceeded the scope of his invitation and became a trespasser where the plaintiff was injured while walking his dog and that because the plaintiff was an invitee there was a genuine issue of material facts as to whether the dealership had constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition.
(9-0)

NOTE – The plaintiff was walking a Heeler when he fell. If anyone ever claims that you can’t hear a footnote, you can refute them with this:

Anderson v. Grabmiller, 2023-CA-00593-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision awarding alimony to the husband, holding that the chancellor did properly consider rehabilitative alimony and that the chancellor did not err in his Armstrong analysis.
(9-0)

Brown v. State, 2023-KA-00648-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder but vacating the firearm enhancement portion, holding that the firearm enhancement should be vacated because the minimum sentence for that enhancement was less than the minimum sentence for the second-degree murder conviction, but that the State’s commends during closing did not rise to the level of plain error, that the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim should be denied without prejudice, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion admitting evidence of a shell casing recovered from the murder scene, that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that there was no cumulative error warranting reversal.
(8-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Jones v. Curtis, 2023-CA-00987-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming decision modifying child-custody agreement, holding that the chancery court had subject matter jurisdiction and did not err in considering facts and events occurring before the initial custody determination.
(7-2-0: McDonald and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Cook v. Vowell, 2023-CA-00724-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming chancery court’s grant of specific performance of an option to purchase an interest in real property, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that there was consideration for the contract where there was no separate consideration spelled-out for the option or in finding that there was a valid offer and acceptance.
(9-0)

In the Matter of L.C.: Doe v. Bolivar County Youth Court, 2022-CA-00614-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the youth court’s finding that the mother had not satisfactorily completed a service plan working towards reunification, holding that there was no substantial evidence to support the youth court’s finding that MDCPS had made requisite “reasonable efforts” towards reunification.
(7-2: Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald; McDonald also separately noted a dissent but did not write)

Georgen v. Estate of Brown-Barrett, 2023-CA-00344-COA (Civil – Personal injury)
Reversing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in a premises-liability case, holding that the trial court erred in finding that a baby gate leaned against a doorway in a residence did not constitute a dangerous condition.
(5-3: Carlton dissented, joined by Barnes, and Wilson; Westbrooks did not participate)

Other Orders

Whiddon v. State, 2022-KA-00616-COA (denying rehearing)
Crawford v. East Mississippi State Hospital, 2022-CA-00753-COA (denying rehearing)
Jackson v. State, 2022-KA-01143-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of April 13, 2023

I was out of town Thursday and Friday doing fun things with my family and summarizing hand downs didn’t fit the agenda. Without further delay, here are summaries of the four decisions the Mississippi Supreme Court handed down while I was out. There is a wrongful death/premises liability decision, a direct appeal of a murder conviction, and two real property contract decisions.

Deepak Jasco, LLC v. Palmer, 2021-IA-00702-SCT (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Reversing the denial of summary judgment in a premises liability case, holding that the plaintiff did not prove that the owner and operator of a convenience store adjacent to a lot where the plaintiff’s decedent was found stabbed and killed had actual or constructive knowledge that an atmosphere of violence existed on the premises.
(5-4-0: Maxwell concurred in part and in the result, joined by Randolph and Beam)

NOTE – Here is the crux of the Court’s analysis:

Anderson v. State, 2022-KA-00007-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of murder, holding that the trial court did not err by refusing an excusable homicide instruction based on heat of passion or by admitting evidence of the defendant’s prior bad act of using methamphetamine just before the shooting and for several days before where the defendant himself testified that he was high on meth when he shot his grandmother and it was relevant to his state of mind and motive.
(9-0)

Sel Business Services, LLC v. Lord, 2021-CT-00368-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s grant of summary judgment in favor of a property owner who made an oral agreement to sell to one buyer but then sold to someone else, holding that while the statute of frauds barred the claim for specific performance the would-be buyer still had other equitable remedies available.
(9-0)

NOTE – The decisions specifically overruled Barriffe v. Estate of Nelson, 153 So. 3d 613 (Miss. 2014):

Luxe Homes, LLC v. Brewer, 2022-IA-00132-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the chancellor’s denial of a motion to transfer venue, holding that the terms of a venue provision in the contract between the parties were unambiguous, mandatory, and enforceable and that the transferred to the circuit court of the venue county even though the suit sought specific performance of a real estate contract.
(7-2-0: Kitchens and King concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Other Orders

$153,340 v. State, 2020-CT-01409-SCT (cert denied)

Wilson v. City of Greenville, 2021-CT-00316-SCT (cert denied)

Johnson v. State, 2021-CT-00571-SCT (cert denied)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of December 15, 2022

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One is a criminal case dealing with a Confrontation Clause violation and the other is a judicial estoppel case that reversed the trial court because of an intervening decisions with a special concurrence that garnered a majority of the Court. The Supreme Court also granted cert in a slip-and-fall case that I had not summarized because the decision from the Court of Appeals was handed down back in June on a Thursday instead of Tuesday so it escaped my notice.

Saunders v. NCAA, 2020-CA-01146-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Reversing the trial court’s dismissal of claims based on judicial estoppel, holding that the plaintiff had no duty to disclose claims for declaratory relief during his Chapter 7 bankruptcy and that the dismissal of the money damages claim was in error per an intervening special concurrence that held that judicial estoppel should not be presumed and is, rather, a fact-specific inquiry that must include how the bankruptcy could dealt with the omission.
(7-2: Justice Coleman concurred in part and dissented in part; Justice Griffis concurred in part and dissented in part)

PRACTICE POINT – Regular readers might recall a discussion about the special concurrence referenced in today’s decision. The case is Jones v. Alcorn State University, 337 So. 3d 1062 (Miss. 2022) and Justice Maxwell’s special concurrence in that case was joined by four other justices. I wondered aloud about the precedential effect of a five-justice special concurrence and then later passed along the answer. In Saunders, the Mississippi Supreme Court reversed the trial court based upon the holding of the special concurrence in Jones.

Willis v. State, 2021-KA-00734-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first degree murder, holding that the trial court violated the defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause by not allowing cross-examination of the lead investigator about prior inconsistent statements but that the error was harmless, that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s self-defense instruction, and that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence.
(6-3-0: Justice Beam concurred in part and in the result, joined by Chief Justice Randolph and Justice Maxwell)

NOTE – For some reason it jumped out that both Kitchens’s majority opinion and Beam’s concurrence utilized the superior (per Strunk & White) “-s’s” to make Williams’s name possessive.

Other Orders

In Re: Rules of Discipline for the Mississippi Bar, 89-R-99010-SCT (appointing Hon. Mark A. Maples as a member of the Complaint Tribunal)

In Re: Tavares Reed, 2017-M-01391 (denying application for leave to proceed in the trial court, finding it frivolous, and restricting the petitioner from filing further applications in forma pauperis)

Moffett v. State, 2018-DR-00276-SCT (denying rehearing and/or reconsideration)

Thomas v. Boyd Biloxi LLC, 2021-CT-00265-SCT (granting cert)
NOTE – I did not recall this case from June. I looked back and realized it escaped my notice because it was an an off-cycle hand-down from the Court of Appeals on Thursday, June 2. The plaintiff slipped and fell on a pool deck after exiting a hot tub. A 5-1-4 Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment dismissing the case, holding that the evidence did not satisfy the standard to defeat summary judgment and that the trial court did not err in denying part of the plaintiff’s 56(f) request.

Hand Down List