Tag: State Boards and Agencies

Double Issue: Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 6, 2024 and February 13, 2024

[Edited to correct the year in the title. I am behind, but I am not a whole year behind.]

I was about snowed under last week so I am trying to catch up here a bit. The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions on February 6 and another nine on February 13.

February 6, 2024

Porter v. State, 2023-CP-00091-COA (Civil – Other)
Vacating the trial court’s denial of a request to be reclassified as a non-habitual offender, holding that the petitioner was not a habitual offender but that his claims were filed in the wrong county so the case was remanded with instructions for the trial court to transfer to the appropriate county.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Gilmore v. State, 2023-CP-00527-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the motion was time-barred and not subject to any of the exceptions.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Ellis v. Turner-Johnson Dodge, Inc., 2022-CA-01126-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the county court’s order compelling arbitration, holding that there was a valid, binding arbitration agreement and that the dispute was within the scope of the agreement.
(7-2: Westbrooks and McDonald dissented; Smith did not participate)

Practice Point – Cite the record early and often in your briefs:

Moates v. State, 2022-KA-01062-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first degree murder, burglary of a dwelling under circumstances likely to terrorize, and simple domestic violence, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to sever the first-degree murder charge, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of prior bad acts, that the evidence was sufficient to support the simple domestic violence conviction, and that retroactive misjoinder argument was moot.
(10-0)

Practice Point – This is a good reminder that “prejudice” is not the test under Rule 403.

Other Orders

Gilbert v. State, 2021-KA-01265-COA (denying rehearing)

Kilcrease v. City of Tupelo, 2022-KM-00194-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

February 13, 2024

Williams v. Bryant, 2022-CA-00630-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a will contest, holding that the chancellor did not err in determining that there was a confidential relationship but that the evidence did not show abuse or suspicious circumstances or active involvement in procurement or execution of the will that would create a presumption of undue influence.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00935-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on the defendant’s alternative defense theory of heat-of-passion manslaughter.
(10-0)

Netherland v. State, 2022-CP-01236-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the petitioner’s Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights were not violated when law enforcement recorded the petitioner selling drugs to an informant and that there was no merit to the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.
(10-0)

Brooks v. State, 2022-KA-01016-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of a dwelling, simple assault domestic violence, and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the conviction for possession of a firearm was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Barnes and Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing)

EEECHO Inc. v. Mississippi Dept. Env’t Quality Permit Bd, 2022-SA-01068-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision affirming MDEQ’s Permit Board’s decision to issue water quality certifications, holding that the Permit Board did not err by not making factual findings regarding the possible storage of explosive ammunition, that the Permit Board’s failure to issue a revise public notice was not arbitrary or capricious, that the Permit Board’s decision that the subject property was preferable to the alternative project sites, and that the Permit Board’s failure to conduct an environmental justice review.
(8-2: McDonald dissented, joined by Westbrooks; Westbrooks dissented without writing)

Smith v. Smith, 2022-CA-00183-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancery court’s child custody and division or martial estate decisions, holding that the chancellor did not err or abuse his discretion in awarding custody to the father or in his visitation ruling, but that the chancellor erred by classifying one of the father’s businesses as separate property.
(10-0)

Wade v. State, 2022-CA-00370-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court’s decision that the plea was voluntary and intelligent notwithstanding the petitioner’s low intellectual ability, that there was no merit to the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, and that Miller did not apply because the felony convictions did not mandate life imprisonment.
(6-4-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Carlton, Westbrooks, and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Hunter v. State, 2022-CP-01269-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying the motion as untimely.
(10-0)

Clarksdale Pub. Utilities Comm’ v. Miss. Dept. of Emp’t Sec., 2022-CC-01085-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision affirming MDES Review Board’s decision approving unemployment benefits, holding that MDES was not collaterally estopped from making the benefits decision as a result of MDEC and CPOC having different standards and definitions of misconduct, that the ALJ did not err in refusing the admit 900 pages of exhibits that the employer offered for lack of foundation, and that there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the ALJ’s findings.
(3-2-3: Westbrooks and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in the result only without writing; Greenlee concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Carlton concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Greenlee and Lawrence; Barnesn did not participate)

Other Orders

Bradshaw v. Bradshaw, 2017-CT-01731-COA (granting motion to seal file on appeal)

Odom v. State, 2021-KA-00676-COA (denying rehearing)

Harrison v. Harrison, 2022-CA-00274-COA (denying rehearing)

Litton v. Litton, 2022-CA-00712-COA (denying rehearing)

Johnson v. Drake, 2022-CA-00818-COA (denying rehearing)

Forrest v. State, 2022-KA-00844-COA (granting pro se letter motion to recall mandate)

Patel v. State, 2022-CA-00985-COA (denying rehearing)

Fox v. State, 2022-KA-00988-COA (granting motion to expedite mandate)

Harvey v. State, 2023-CT-00157-COA (recalling mandate sua sponte)

Clark v. State, 2023-TS-01116-COA (granting motion to proceed out of time)

Odom v. State, 2023-TS-01165-COA (granting public defender’s motion withdraw, to substitute counsel, and respond to order to show cause)

Winn Dixie Stores v. Little, 2023-WC-01177-COA (granting motion to dismiss appeal as interlocutory)

Holifiend v. State, 2023-TS-01320-COA (granting motion to proceed out of time)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 12, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight decisions on Tuesday that cover a lot of territory. There is something for just about everybody.

Read on down for a case that underscores the importance of keeping up with the weekly hand downs from the Mississippi Supreme Court and Mississippi Court of Appeals. (Subscribing to this blog probably doesn’t hurt you in that endeavor.)

Coogan v. Nationwide Prop. and Cas. Ins. Co., 2022-CA-01063-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming partial summary judgment in policy holders’ suit against their auto liability carrier, holding that the carrier had an arguably reasonable basis to support its claims handling the circuit court did not err in finding that there was no genuine issue of material fact on the bad faith punitive damages claim or the Veasley damages claim.
(6-2-1: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing, Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing, McDonald dissented without writing, Lawrence did not participate)

Forrest v. State, 2022-KA-00844-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and that the court did not admit inadmissible hearsay or irrelevant evidence, and dismissing the ineffective assistance of counsel claim without prejudice.
(10-0)

Hills v. Manns, 2022-CA-00774-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming modification of visitation schedule, holding that the chancellor did not err in not dismissing the mother’s petition on the basis of res judicata, not awarding him attorney’s fees, or in awarding the mother final decision-making authority.
(10-0)

Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2022-CA-01240-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing the trial court’s dismissal of a personal injury lawsuit on judicial estoppel grounds, holding that the case should be remanded to allow the circuit court to apply the test from a recent Mississippi Supreme Court decision that was handed down after the circuit court’s ruling.
(10-0)

PRACTICE POINT – This case illustrates the importance of keeping up with decisions handed down weekly by Mississippi’s appellate courts. (By extension, this case illustrates why you and all of your friends should subscribe to the Mississippi Appeals Blog – I covered the Saunders decision here when it was handed down.)

PRACTICE POINT (continued): Though the Mississippi Supreme Court’s decision in Saunders was handed down after the summary judgment order was entered, the Supreme Court’s decision in Jones, infra, with its special concurrence, was handed down before the summary judgment proceedings. So the precedential special concurrence in Jones that controlled this case was in force during the summary judgment proceedings. This case serves as a good reminder that special concurrences that garner a majority of the court have the force of precedent. (Another shameless plug: I covered the Jones decision here when it was handed down and specifically discussed the precedential value of the special concurrence.)

Barefield v. Barefield, 2022-CA-00834-COA (Civil – Torts-Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s order requiring the former member/owner of an investment company to pay a forensic accountant’s fee for services during litigation among all members/owners, holding that the exert was court-appointed and the chancellor had discretion to order the party whose actions necessitated the lawsuit to pay the fees.
(8-2-0: McCarty concurred in part and in result without writing; Wilson concurred in result only without writing)

Henderson v. State, 2022-KA-00661-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Nichols v. State, 2022-KA-00202-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of first-degree murder and remanding for new trial, holding that the circuit court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the “castle doctrine,” while also holding that the evidence to support the conviction was legally sufficient so the remedy was a new trial.
(10-0)

Miss. Dept. of Human Servs. v. Johnson, 2022-SA-00605-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision voiding a 2002 paternity and child-support order was void for insufficient service of process, holding that in light of MDHS’s admission that failed to effect proper service under Rule 81(d) MDHS’s arguments under the doctrine of laches, judicial estoppel, unjust enrichment, and public policy failed.
(6-4: Greenlee dissented, joined by Wilson, Lawrence, and Emfinger)

Other Orders

Gillen v. Gillen, 2021-CA-00837-COA (granting motion for appellate attorneys’ fees)

Moore v. State, 2022-KA-00327-COA (granting appearance as counsel, but denying motion to substitute and motion to file supplemental brief)

Diming v. State, 2022-KA-00412-COA (recalling mandate and granting motion for time to file motion for rehearing)

Russell v. State, 2022-KA-00447-COA (recalling mandate and granting motion for time to file motion for rehearing)

Greater Hamilton Grove Baptist Church v. Hamilton Grove Missionary Baptist Church, 2022-CA-00518-COA (denying rehearing)

Rehabilitation Centers, Inc. v. Williams, 2023-WC-00453-COA (denying motion for reconsideration)

Mitchell v. State, 2023-TS-00764-COA (granting motion to proceed out-of-time)

Robinson v. State, 2023-TS-00935-COA (dismissing untimely appeal)

Britton v. State, 2023-TS-01060-COA (dismissing untimely appeal)

Rutherford v. State, 2023-TS-01066-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of appealable judgment)

Rutherford v. State, 2023-TS-01069-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of appealable judgment)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 15, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals six opinions today. The court served up two direct criminal appeals, an easement by necessity case, a workers’ comp jurisdiction case, a MDES case, and a PCR case.

Ramsey v. State, 2022-CP-00103-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in dismissing it as successive.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Hobby v. Ott, 2021-CA-01305-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the chancellor’s order granting an easement by necessity, holding that the chancellor court erred in making this ruling without any supporting proof in the record regarding the costs of alternative routes of access, and rendering judgment denying the request.
(10-0)

Chatman v. State, 2022-KA-00386-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery of a minor, holding that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction.
(10-0)

Pritchett v. MDES, 2022-CC-00808-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming a finding that an employee was not entitled to benefits, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the determination by MDES that the employee had voluntarily abandoned her job without finishing her assigned duties.
(6-4-0: No separate opinions – Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only)

Boyington v. State, 2022-KA-00601-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of fleeing law enforcement and being a felon in possession of a firearm, holding that the trial court committed error in admitting a photograph of a swastika tattoo on the defendant’s body but that it was harmless error.
(7-3-0: No separate opinions – Wilson, Greenlee, and Smith concurred in part and in the result)

NOTE – Here is the Court’s summary of its analysis:

Wheeler v. Mississippi Limestone Corp., 2022-WC-00534-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the dismissal of a workers’ comp claim, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the claimant was neither hired nor regularly employed in Mississippi and that the employer did not assume liability for the injury by maintaining insurance under the MWCA.
(9-1-0: No separate opinions – McDonald concurred in the result only)

Other Orders

Clayton v. State, 2021-KA-00505-COA (denying rehearing)

Kirk v. Newton, 2021-CA-00684-COA (denying rehearing)

Smith v. State, 2021-KA-01003-COA (denying rehearing)

Dawson v. Burgs, 2021-CA-01038-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 1, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. We have a couple of state boards and agencies decisions, one dealing with recall of a police officer’s certification and the other with a termination of a teacher and suspension of license. There is a real property case involving a church and the invocation of the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine,” a direct criminal appeal, and two PCR cases.

As a housekeeping note, I have started writing “sub silentio” instead of “without separate written opinion” to indicate concurrences and dissents without separate written opinions. I am not aware of that phrase being used in that specific manner, but I think it gets the point across. This may not seem like a big deal, and it really isn’t, but the frequency with which I have been typing “without separate written opinion” has become a thief of joy for this humble blogger of case summaries.

Walters v. Board on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Training, 2022-SA-00378-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision affirming Board’s decision to recall a police officer’s processional certification, holding that the Board’s decision was not arbitrary and capricious, did not violate the former officer’s constitutional rights, and were supported by substantial evidence including evidence of unnecessary force, violations of department policies, and racist text messages.
(10-0)

NOTE– The Court also granted in part a motion from the Board to unseal the case file.

Pickle v. State, 2022-CP-00929-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision denying a motion to vacate a sentence for capital murder while committing criminal rape from 1978, holding that the petitioner was not illegally sentenced and that he was not entitled to a Miller resentencing hearing.
(8-2-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result sub silentio; Lawrence concurred in the result only sub silentio.)

Greater New Hamilton Grove Baptist Church v. Hamilton Grove Missionary Baptist Church, 2022-CA-00518-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s ruling that a deed purporting to convey real property owned by a church was invalid because it was not authorized by a resolution under section 79-11-31(1), holding that the chancellor was not deprived of subject matter jurisdiction under the “ecclesiastical abstention doctrine,” that the “minutes rule” was not applicable because a church is not a public board, and the chancellor did not abuse her discretion in granting the plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint.
(10-0)

NOTE – I thought the Court’s summary of its decision on the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine was interesting:

Badger v. State, 2022-CP-00831-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of the petitioner’s third motion for PCR twelve years after pleading guilty, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the motion was time-barred and did not meet any statutory exception under the UPCCRA or any fundamental rights exception that was in effect at that time.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only sub silentio.)

Langley v. Miss. State Board of Education, 2022-SA-01024-COA (Civil – State Board and Agencies)
Affirming the BOE’s decision upholding a teacher’s termination for violations of the BOE’s standards of conduct, suspending her license for five years, and placing conditions on reinstatement, holding that the Commission’s decision as upheld by the Board and the chancery court was supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary or capricious, the Commission was authorized to suspect her license, and she was afforded due process at her hearing.
(10-0)

West v. State, 2022-KA-00432-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery and gratification of lust, both while in position of trust and authority, holding that the defendant’s sufficiency of the evidence argument was procedurally barred because it was not raised before the circuit court and that the circuit court did not commit plain error in not sua sponte declaring a mistrial.
(5-3-2: Barnes, McDonald, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result sub silentio; Greenlee concurred in part and dissented in part sub silentio; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McDonald and Greenlee in part)

Other Orders

Wakefield v. State, 2021-KA-00187-COA (denying rehearing)

Estate of Bell v. Estate of Bell, 2021-CA-00789-COA (denying rehearing)

Anderson v. State, 2021-KA-01340-COA (denying rehearing)

McDowell v. State, 2021-CA-01381-COA (denying rehearing)

Everett v. State, 2021-CP-01415-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 13, 2023

I was out of town for a wedding anniversary trip on Tuesday, and then I have been playing catch-up at the office to recover from said trip, so my summaries are delayed this week. First up is Tuesday’s offering from Mississippi Court of Appeals. The COA handed down five opinions this week: a termination of parental rights case, an emancipation case, two direct criminal appeals, and an attempted appeal of a MDOC decision.

Rogers v. Kresse, 2021-CA-00914-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming termination of parental rights, holding that the chancery court did not err in finding that the natural mother had abandoned her children and that the father had not abused his discretion with regard to visitation by disallowing it, and that reunification was not in the children’s best interest.
(7-2-0: McDonald concurred in part in and the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Talley v. Talley, 2022-CA-00005-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s judgment in an emancipation proceeding initiated by a father with a counter-petition for contempt for failure to pay filed by the mother, holding that the chancellor did not err by finding that the children were emancipated while not modifying the life insurance provision of the divorce agreement, finding the father in contempt for failing to pay his portion of certain expenses, and awarding the mother attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Barnes did not participate.)

Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00331-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of selling fentanyl and trafficking and possession of controlled substances while possessing a firearm, holding that the circuit court did not err in admitting text messages into evidence on authentication, relevance, or hearsay grounds.
(7-3-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Wallace v. State, 2022-KA-00332-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s request for a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction or by allowing testimony related to injuries the victim suffered a week before her death.
(9-0: Smith did not participate.)

NOTE– I love it when opinions cut to the chase. Introductions like this would just about put me out of business around here:

Knight v. State, 2021-CP-01192-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the appeal of a purported PCR motion was untimely and because it was actually a petition seeking judicial review of an MDOC decision it was a civil appeal for which the Court could not suspend the rules to allow an untimely appeal.
(10-0)

Other Orders

McKenzie v. State, 2012-KA-00471-COA (dismissing untimely motion for rehearing)

Thomas v. State, 2021-CP-00060-COA (denying rehearing)

Pace v. State, 2022-KA-00046-COA (denying rehearing)

Jones v. State, 2023-TS-00325-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)

Bates v. State, 2023-TS-00356-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as timely based on well-taken pro se show-cause response)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 6, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. One is an appeal from a DOR assessment, one is a case seeking to set aside warranty deeds over alleged undue influence, one is a direct criminal appeal, and the other three are PCR. No appellant prevailed today.

Toolpushers Supply Co. v. Mississippi Department of Revenue, 2021-SA-01186-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming summary judgment that affirmed the DOR’s assessment for unpaid retail sales tax, penalties, and interest, holding that there was no genuine issue of material fact about the sales at issue being “retail sales” as opposed to “wholesale sales.”
(10-0)

Holcombe v. Estate of King, 2021-CA-01234-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor ‘s ruling in a case seeking to set aside warranty deeds because of alleged undue influence, holding that that the factors of a confidential relationship were not established by clear and convincing proof.
(10-0)

Hill v. State, 2022-KA-00524-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that the trial court properly refused the defendant’s lesser-included-offense instruction of heat-of-passion manslaughter, that the indictment was not defective or constructively amended, and that the right to a speedy trial was not violated.
(9-0: Smith did not participate.)

Hamilton v. State, 2022-CP-00217-COA (Civil – PCR) (consolidated with Hamilton v. State, 2022-CP-00218-COA)
Affirming denial of the petitioner’s third and fourth motions for PCR, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the motions were time-barred, successive, barred by res judicata, and without merit.
(10-0)

Winston v. State, 2022-CA-00747-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a PCR motion, holding that the petitioner lacked standing to file a PCR motion and that the petition was time-barred.
(10-0)

Varnado v. State, 2021-CP-01073-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a pro se PCR motion, holding that the petitioner failed to present sufficient evidence that his guilty plea was involuntary, that he was misinformed concerning eligibility for release, that his trial counsel was ineffective, or that there was prosecutorial misconduct.
(6-1-3: Carlton dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty; Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Other Orders

West Jasper Consolidated School District v. Rogers, 2021-CA-00171-COA (denying rehearing)

Hathorne v. State, 2021-CA-00306-COA (denying rehearing)

Kirk v. State, 2021-KA-00733-COA (denying rehearing)/

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of May 25, 2023

It was a slow day at the Mississippi Supreme Court for the hand-down department. The Court handed down just one opinion in a DOR case about unpaid sales tax and denied cert in two other cases.

Saltwater Sportsman Outfitters, LLC v. Mississippi Dept. of Revenue, 2021-SA-00881-SCT (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of MDOR in a dispute over unpaid sales taxes, holding that the company’s failure to keep records rendered MDOR’s assessment presumptively correct and that the company could not overcome that presumption.
(9-0)

Blount v. State, 2021-CT-00204-SCT (denying cert)

Moss v. Moss, 2021-CT-00452-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 9, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine ten opinions today. There are two direct criminal appeals, a divorce case, a bad faith insurance case, an appeal of the suspension of police officers, a construction bid appeal, and two PCR cases.

Durr v. State, 2021-KA-01109-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of conspiracy to commit armed robbery, capital murder, armed robbery, and aggravated assault, holding that ineffective assistance claim based on Defendant’s representation by the same public defender’s office that represented codefendents who testified against Defendant should be dismissed without prejudice and that if there was error in admitting a codefendant’s affidavit as substantive it was harmless.
(8-2: Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald; McDonald also dissented without separate written opinion.)

Hughes v. State, 2021-CP-01241-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion to vacate PRS revocation and imposition of suspended sentence, holding that the circuit court did not err in ruling based on absconscion.
(10-0)

Sanders v. State, 2022-KA-00351-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of failing to update sex offender registration, holding based upon review of a Lindsey Brief, review of a pro se brief, and the record that there were no arguable issues that would warrant reversal.
(10-0)

Adams v. City of Jackson, 2021-CC-00454-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision affirming the suspension of two officers for engaging in a pursuit while Jackson had a no-pursuit policy, holding that the clear and substantial evidence showed that there was no “pursuit” where an officer initiated a traffic stop and followed the suspect for just over a mile at between 10-20mph.
(8-1: McDonald dissented without separate written opinion; Westbrooks did not participate.)

Davis v. Davis, 2021-CA-01246-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part a chancellor’s judgment of divorce, holding there was no error in granting divorce on the grounds of adultery but holding that the chancellor did not properly classify and value certain assets and debts and remanded for proper classification and valuations.
(8-2-0: Wilson and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

PRACTICE POINT – Make the trial court’s job easy! It is good advocacy and it is the humane thing to do.

Watkins v. State, 2021-CP-01301-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that all issues were procedurally barred and without merit.
(9-1-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Groves v. State, 2021-KA-00755-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of kidnapping and armed robbery, holding that the circuit court did not err in allowing the use of the word “victim” to describe the victim, that the claim of prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments was procedurally barred and without merit, and that the verdict was supported by substantial evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of it.
(10-0)/

Gregory Construction Services, Inc. v. Miss. Dept. of Finance and Admin., 2021-SA-00765-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming determination that a contractor’s denied construction bid was non-responsive for failing to include a one-page federal form, holding that there were no due process considerations since the plaintiff had no vested property interest in the denied bid and the agencies’ decisions were supported by substantial evidence and reasoning.
(9-0: McCarty did not participate.)

Holloway v. Nat’l Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 2021-CA-01066-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming summary judgment in a bad faith case alleging that a reservation of rights was in bad faith and caused emotional distress even though the carrier ultimately funded a settlement to secure a release of all claims against the insured, holding that the carrier had a legitimate basis for defending under a reservation of rights.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Other Orders

Liberty Nat’l Life Ins. Co. v. Hancock, 2021-CA-00605-COA (denying rehearing)

Moreland v. Spears, 2021-CA-00714-COA (denying rehearing)

Lamy v. Lamy, 2021-CA-00770-COA (denying rehearing)

Colburn v. State, 2021-KA-00865-COA (denying rehearing)

Brooks v. Jeffreys, 2021-CA-01113-COA (denying rehearing)

Nunn v. State, 2021-KA-01371-COA (recalling mandate to allow pro se motion for rehearing to proceed on the merits)

MS Concrete and Benchmark Ins. Co. v. Harris, 2022-WC-01095-COA (denying motion for rehearing of dismissal of appeal)

Hunter v. State, 2022-TS-01269-COA (granting motion for reconsideration and denying motion for appointment of counsel)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of April 27, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. Both decisions are 6-3 reversals. One is an appeal of a summary judgment ruling in a slip-and-fall case and the other is an appeal of a zoning decision.

Thomas v. Boyd Biloxi, LLC, 2021-CT-00265-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing the COA’s decision affirming summary judgment in favor of a resort in a slip-and-fall on a pool deck case, holding that two prior falls and evidence that water pooled in the area where the plaintiff fell was sufficient evidence of breach and that there was evidence that a breach of duty proximately caused the fall.
(6-3: Griffis dissented, joined by Coleman and Ishee.)

City of Ocean Springs v. Illanne, 2021-CA-01100-SCT (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Reversing the circuit court’s reversal of a City’s zoning decisions, holding that remand was necessary for a hearing to determine whether a zoning applicant was a “petitioner” under Section 11-51-75 such that the failure to name him and give him notice deprived the circuit court of jurisdiction.
(6-3: Coleman dissented, joined by Randolph and Griffis)

Other Order

La Casa I, LLC v. Gottfried, 2021-CT-00347-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 4, 2023

I am playing catch-up because my paying work had me preoccupied last week. The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions last Tuesday. There were a couple of direct criminal appeals, an alimony case, an appeal of a $2.8M auto liability verdict, a couple of PCR cases, and an appeal of an MDOC issue.

Gillenwater v. Redmond, 2021-CA-01378-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming modification of alimony, holding that chancellor did not abuse her discretion by reducing (but not terminating) the alimony obligation based on the ex-wife’s cohabitation and mutual support.
(8-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in the result only without separate written opinion; Judge Lawrence did not participate.)

Tubwell v. State, 2022-KM-00342-COA (Criminal- Misdemeanor)
Affirming conviction of violating the child-restraint laws, holding that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction where there were two adults and three children in a single-cab pickup and one child was sitting in the driver’s lap.
(8-2-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without separate written opinion.)

Winters v. State, 2022-CP-00435-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the motion was time-barred, successive, and without merit.
(10-0)

Williamson v. State, 2021-KA-00830-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of a dwelling, burglary of a shed, and trafficking stolen firearms, holding that the evidence was sufficient and that the verdict was not against the weight of it and that there was no error admitting evidence of other crimes, in denying a motion to suppress evidence obtained in a search of the defendant’s home, in denying a motion for continuance, or in not halting trial during a power outage.
(10-0)

Everett v. State, 2021-CP-01385-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the denial of a PCR motion, holding that the illegal sentence claim was time-barred and without merit and that the claim regarding earned-discharged credits was properly dismissed because that claim should have been filed in the venue where the plaintiff is housed.
(8-1-0: No separate opinions – Westbrooks concurred in result only and Smith did not participate)

Robinson v. MDOC, 2022-CP-00018-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming denial of petition for judicial review after the petitioner was denied a request to participate in the Meritorious Earned TIME Incentive Program, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the court lacked personal jurisdiction because MDOC had not been given notice of the appeal and that the petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.
(8-2-0: No separate opinions – McCarty concurred in part and in the result and McDonald concurred in result only.)

Kirk v. Newton, 2021-CA-00684-COA (Civil – Tort)
Affirming a nearly $2.8 million verdict in an auto liability case, holding that the question of who caused the accident was a fact issue for the jury, that there was no evidence of bias, passion, or prejudice to show that the award should be reduced or set aside, and that there was no error in using national average for wage calculation that was lower than the plaintiff’s actual wages where the jury heard both sides from experts and weighed their credibility.
(8-1-1: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Greenlee dissented.)

NOTE – I do not think this case represents the departure from Rebelwood that I thought it would when I was first reading it. My take is that the fact that the national average figure used by the plaintiff was less than the actual wage-earning history was critical to this decision.

Other Orders

$41,080 v. State, 2021-CA-00692-COA (denying rehearing)

Durant Healthcare, LLC v. Garrette, 2021-CA-00823-COA (denying rehearing)

Owens v. State, 2021-KA-000887-COA (denying rehearing)

The Banking Group, Inc. v. Southern Bancorp Bank, 2021-CA-01077-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List