Tag: Visitation

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 2, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions on Tuesday. Four are criminal appeals. The three civil cases involve child visitation modification, a 12(b)(6) motion, and a motion to compel arbitration.

Holifield v. State, 2023-KA-01320-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction, that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and also declining to address the ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claim on direct appeal.
(8-2-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing’ Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing)

Rodgers v. State, 2024-KA-01116-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that there was sufficient evidence that he possessed a firearm on the date alleged in the indictment.
(9-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)

Cosby v. State, 2024-KA-00518-COA, consolidated with Cosby v. State, 2024-KA-00522-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming two defendants’ convictions of sexual battery of a minor, holding that the trial court did not err by denying their motion for directed verdict or in denying their JNOV, that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction, that the trial court did not err in failing to conduct a pretrial hearing on a tender-years issue, that the trial court did not err in limiting cross-examination of witnesses, and that the plaintiff’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim lacked merit.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Kirkland v. Kirkland, 2024-CA-00801-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s ruling on a visitation modification petition, holding that the chancellor did not abuse her discretion, commit clear error, or manifest error in denying the mother’s petition to modify visitation or in granting the father’s counterclaim for additional visitation.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Martin v. Smith, 2024-CA-01027-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the trial court’s decision granting the defendant’s 12(b)(6) motion, holding that the plaintiff failed to sufficiently state claims for defamation, slander, malicious interference with employment, or intentional infliction of emotional distress under Mississippi’s pleading standard.
(7-2-1: Weddle for the Court; Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Barnes dissented without writing)

Jenkins v. Ford Motor Company, 2024-CA-00994-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the trial court’s decision granting a motion to compel arbitration, holding that although the defendant asserted arbitration in its answer waiting nearly one year before filing a motion to compel arbitration while engaging in the litigation process constituted failure to pursue it.
(6-4: Lawrence for the Court; Emfinger dissented, joined by Barnes, Wilson, and Lassitter St. Pe’)

Practice Point – Arbitration agreements have made a strong showing on here lately. Beware of recycled briefing on arbitration-related issues.

Butler v. State, 2024-KA-00821-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s imperfect self-defense instruction where the trial court also granted the defendant’s self-defense instruction.
(10-0: Westbrooks for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Green v. Presbyterian Day School, 2023-CA-01278-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Luster v. State, 2024-CA-00014-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Brownlee v. State, 2024-CA-00585-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Teel v. Boyd Biloxi, LLC, 2024-CP-00810-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 7, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions of substance yesterday. There is a divorce case, a timber case, a felony, a visitation/in loco parentis case, an heirship case, and a UM/UIM case with an interesting procedural question.

Hodge v. Hodge, 2024-CA-00745-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision granting the ex-wife’s petition to set aside a final divorce degree arguing that she was forced to sign it under duress, holding that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in finding the Rule 60(b)(4) motion timely, that section 93-5-2(5) did not apply because the complaint was not contested, that the chancellor erred by determining that the final divorce decree should be set aside in part because of the ex-husband’s claim splitting, and that there was not clear and convincing evidence that the ex-husband committed fraud.
(9-0: Lawrence for the Court; Barnes did not participate)

Payne Logging, LLC v. Smith, 2024-CA-00439-COA (Civil – Property Damage)
Affirming the chancellor’s award of monetary damages in a landowner’s claim against a logging company that removed timber off their property without permission while logging a neighbor’s property, holding that the chancery court did not err in applying the statutory guidelines in section 95-5-10.
(10-0: Westbrooks for the Court)

Hall v. State, 2024-KA-00364-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted capital murder, holding the the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and that it was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Edwards v. Johnson, 2023-CA-01271-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision denying a petition to establish visitation by a non-parent, holding that the chancellor erred in applying the doctrine of unclean hands before determining the petitioner’s in loco parentis status and, if necessary, reaching the issue of whether visitation was in the child’s best interest.
(6-3: Carlton for the Court; Weddle concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Wilson dissented; Emfinger dissented, joined in part by Wilson and Weddle; Lawrence did not participate)

In the Matter of Estate of Lewis: Curry v. Thomas, 2024-CA-00346-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision establishing paternity, holding that the one-year limitation for paternity is self-executing and thus cannot be waived and that the petitioner was barred from asserting an heirship claim because she did not attempt to establish paternity until almost eighteen years after her putative father’s death.
(7-3*: Barnes for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald, McCarty, and Lassitter St Pe’)

Thompson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, 2024-CA-00393-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict in favor of a UM carrier, holding that the trial court did not err in granting a directed verdict for the UM carrier because there was no proof that the tortfeasor was an uninsured motorist and UM/UIM status was a question for the jury, that the UM carrier did not waive the argument that UM coverage was not applicable because the carrier did not have a duty to prove that the tortfeastor was an uninsured motorist, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a new trial.
(7-3: Barnes for the Court; McDonald dissented without writing; McCarty dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McDonald)

Practice Point – McCarty’s dissent took issue with the directed verdict being granted during the damages phase of trial in front of the jury:

Other Orders

  • Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00884-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Quinn v. State, 2023-KA-01143-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 1, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions yesterday. There is just one criminal case and the rest are civil cases that run the gamut of practice areas from the statute of frauds to a hunting club dispute.

Smith v. Estate of Watson, 2023-CA-00761-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the chancellor’s judgment ordering the payment of creditor’s claims, disbursement of remaining assets, and closing the estate, holding that the chancellor failed to follow the statutory procedure for administering the insolvent estate.
(8-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Lowe v. Wall Doxey State Park, 2023-CA-00828-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal of an MTCA personal injury case, holding that the trial court properly found that the State was not properly served with presuit notice because Plaintiff did not sent notice to the correct state entity.
(9-0)

Stallworth v. Mississippi Department of Employment Security, 2022-CC-01300-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming MDES Board of Review’s decision finding that the claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits, holding that the Board’s decision was substantial evidence and was neither arbitrary nor capricious where evidence showed that the claimant voluntarily left work without good cause.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Mazie v. Boozier-Mazie, 2023-CA-00470-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming order granting a motion to enforce a judgment of divorce and finding the ex-husband in contempt and denying a new trial, holding that the chancellor acted within her discretion to find the ex-husband in contempt for not complying with the court’s judgment.
(8-0: Westbrooks did not participate)

Walker v. Hasty, 2023-CA-00675-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s judgment modifying visitation and increasing child support obligation, holding that arguments that the trial was unfair were waived and without merit, that modifying visitation was not a change in custody, that there was substantial evidence to support the chancery court’s findings, and that the court did not prohibit one party from making a proffer and that party failed to make a proffer.
(8-0: Westbrooks did not participate)

Howard v. Nelson, 2023-CA-00947-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming dismissal of a case seeking specific performance enforcing an oral contract to sell land, holding that the statute of frauds applied.
(9-0)

Gandy v. State, 2023-KA-01017-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of sexual battery and two counts of gratification of lust, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-0)

Short v. The Break Land Company, LLC, 2022-CA-01180-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming judgment on the pleadings in a dispute between landowners and an LLC that owned adjacent property for a hunting club of which the landowners were members that arose from the landowners wanting to shoot deer that were damaging their crops and the hunting club’s apparent retaliatory rule adoption and ultimate revocation of the landowner’s membership, holding that the landowners failed to state a claim for any causes of action, that the operating agreement barred the landowners’ claims, and that the trial court did not err not allowing the landowners to amend their complaint where they made no request of the trial court.
(8-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Long v. State, 2023-KA-00351-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, holding that the claim trial counsel committed a Batson violation was procedurally barred and without merit, that the trial court did not err in denying the motion for directed verdict, and that the spoliation argument that the State lost photographs of the crime scene was procedurally barred and without merit, and declined to address Plaintiff’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim on direct appeal.
(7-2: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

  • Clemmons v. State, 2022-CA-00700-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Designer Custom Homes, LLC v. U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies, LLC, 2023-CA-00207 (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 3, 2024 and September 10, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions last week and three opinions this week. Since I was out of the office last Tuesday I included last week’s cases in this post. Between the two dates there there are a couple of service-of-process cases, a few personal injury cases, a couple of domestic relations cases, direct criminal appeals, and a two PCR cases. Appellants prevailed in all three of today’s cases.

September 3, 2024

Havard v. Hart, 2023-CA-00260-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for insufficient service of process, holding that there was substantial evidence supporting the trial court’s finding that the defendant had not been properly served and that the plaintiff did not have good cause for failing to timely serve process.
(8-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Old Hattiesburg High, L.P. v. Harris Construction Services, LLC, 2023-CA-00579-COA (Civil – Other)
Dismissing appeal of order denying a motion to reinstate an order obtaining expunging a contractor’s lien, holding that the initial order expunging the lien was not a final appealable order and that subsequent orders on motions revising the interim order were not final either.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Hyland v. State, 2023-CA-00256-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of PCR motion challenging his convictions and seeking an out-of-time appeal, holding that motion was time-barred and successive.
(9-0)

Fortner v. Bratcher, 2023-CP-00664-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s findings related to motions for contempt and custody modification, holding that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion finding the father in contempt, carrying forward the parties’ agreed visitation schedule, or enjoining the parties from contacting CPS with allegations of neglect or abuse without first contacting local law enforcement.
(9-0)

Miller v. State, 2023-CP-00812-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that it was barred by the UPCCRA’s statute of limitations.
(9-0)

Wilkerson v. Allred, 2023-CA-00393-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing claims for emotional distress damage after the defendant shot and killed the plaintiff’s puppy in the head as it sat next to the plaintiff’s twelve-year-old sister, holding that there was a jury question on the issue of whether the plaintiff’s emotional distress injuries were reasonably foreseeable to the defendant.
(4-3-2: Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing; Carlson dissented, joined by Emfinger and joined in part by McDonald.)

September 10, 2024

Bell v. State, 2023-CA-00951-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Vacating and remanding revocation of a suspended sentence, holding that the trial judge was automatically disqualified because she had previously served as the ADA for the underlying conviction.
(7-2: Barnes dissented, joined by Wilson)

Wells v. Wells, 2023-CA-00674-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancery court’s judgment granting the wife’s petition for divorce and divesting the husband of his interest in real property, holding that there was no evidence that the husband was properly served.
(4-1-4: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes, Lawrence and Smith.)

Deere v. Taylor, 2023-CA-00063-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing the trial court’s dismissal of a personal injury lawsuit, holding that the prohibition against claim-splitting was not triggered where the plaintiff filed one lawsuit but was unable to serve the defendants and months later filed a second lawsuit asserting the same causes of action against the same parties while the first lawsuit sat stale.

Other Orders

  • Daly v. Raines, 2022-CT-00600-SCT (denying appellant’s to voluntarily dismiss this appeal)
  • McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2022-CA-01175-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Estate of Staten: Staten v. Pedersen, 2023-CA-00228-COA (denying untimely motion tor additional time to file a motion for rehearing)
  • Stewart v. State, 2024-TS-00606-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)

September 3, 2024 Hand Down Page

September 10, 2024 Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of August 10, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two decisions today. Both are domestic relations cases involving with children (custody and visitation). Both are reversals (one reversed the Court of Appeals and affirmed the chancellor while the other reversed the chancellor). Both are authored by Justice Beam.

Blagodirova v. Schrock, 2020-CT-01162-SCT (Civil – Custody)
Reversing a 4-2-4 Court of Appeals decision and reinstating and affirming the chancellor’s ruling in a custody matter, holding that there was substantial evidence in the record to support the chancellor’s finding of a material, substantial, and adverse change in circumstances that warranted custody modification.
(9-0)

NOTE – Here is the Court’s recap of the circumstances at issue:

Brownlee v. Powell, 2022-CA-00196-SCT (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision on an unmarried, non-parent, former live-in partner’s petition for in loco parentis visitation rights, holding that the chancellor erred in finding that the petitioner lacked standing without citing Mississippi law and in disposing of the case under 12(b)(6); that there was no plain error in the chancellor considering text messages without allowing other evidence; and that the chancellor erred in finding the petition frivolous and awarding attorney’s fees.
(6-3-0: Kitchens concurred in result only, joined by King and Griffis, and joined in part by Ishee.)

NOTE – The person seeking visitation won a trip back to the trial court, but I don’t read this opinion as blazing path to victory on the merits. Here are a few excerpts

and…

and…

and…

Other Orders

McPhail v. McPhail, 2020-CA-00739-SCT (denying petition construed by the Court as one for rehearing as untimely)

Moreland v. Spears, 2021-CT-00714-SCT (denying cert)

Norwood v. State, 2021-KA-00903-SCT (denying rehearing)

Brooks v. Jeffreys, 2021-CT-01113-SCT (denying cert)

Simoneaux v. State, 2022-CT-00532-SCT (dismissing cert petition)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 3, 2023

Happy New Year! The courts are back in action so I am too. The first hand down list of 2023 has four opinions from the Mississippi Court of Appeals. Two are personal injury cases, one is a custody modification case, and the other is a PCR case.

Mallard v. State, 2022-CA-00152-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the denial of a PCR motion, holding that the plaintiff’s right to a speedy trial was not violated and that a discrepancy in the sentencing order and transcript was a scrivener’s error not warranting reversal.
(10-0)

Yarborough v. Singing River Health Systems, 2021-CA-00668-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming judgment in favor of the defendant hospital after a bench trial in a negligence suit stemming from a fall while the plaintiff was get onto a medical transport bus, holding that the duty owed was the duty owed to an invitee and there was no evidence that the steps to the bus were not reasonably safe, that the decision was not against the weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not err in excluding testimony that the driver was in the habit of of being late, and that an objective person could not find the judge biased based on a comment she made while stepping down from the bench.
(7-2-0: Judge Westbrooks and Judge McDonald concurred in the result only without separate written opinion; Judge Lawrence did not participate)

Moreland v. Spears, 2021-CA-00714-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming modification of custody and visitation, holding that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion by awarding the mother sole legal custody, by restricting the father’s visitation, or by not finding the mother in contempt for withholding visitation during March 2020 while the COVID “stay-home order” was still active.
(10-0)

COVID AND THE LAW – The father argued that the mother should be held in contempt for withholding a visitation that was due to occur during the March 2020 COVID shutdown. The mother testified that she tried to set up alternate times but the father refused. The Court of Appeals held that the particular facts of this case supported the chancellor’s decision of no contempt:

Cornell v. MDHS, 2021-SA-00784-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming in part and reversing in part summary judgment in favor of MDHS in a case alleging that MDHS placed the plaintiff in foster care with a know pedophile, holding that MDHS is statutorily immune from suit regarding the investigation and licensing of the foster parents’ home but reversing the grant of summary judgment on the issues of whether MDHS’s failure to report allegations of abuse and MDHS’s failure to conduct required visits were the proximate cause of continued abuse.
(8-2: Judge Wilson concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Chief Judge Barnes)

Other Orders

Edwards v. State, 2021-KA-00261-COA (denying rehearing)

Virden v. Campbell Delong, LLP, 2021-CA-00478-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 22, 2022

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions before making a break for the turkey this week. There is a custody case reviewing a contempt order related to visitation rights, a civil asset forfeiture case, a previously-decided MTCA wrongful death case with a substituted opinion, a real property contract case with a claim by the would-be purchaser for specific performance or damages, and a couple of PCR cases.

Kay v. Kay, 2021-CA-01377-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancery court’s contempt ruling, holding that there was substantial credible evidence supporting the finding of the father willfully failed to comply with visitation guidelines and denied the mother visitation rights but reversing the part of the order directing the children to report to jail if they chose not participate in future scheduled visitation with their mother.
(10-0)

McDonald v. State, 2021-CP-01040-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the denial of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit court had jurisdiction to resentence the plaintiff and that there was no merit to the claims that the guilty plea was not voluntary or for ineffective assistance of counsel.
(1o-0)

Parker v. State, 2021-CP-01102-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a PCR motion, holding that the plaintiff did not overcome the time bar, there was no merit to his claims that he was wrongly sentenced as a habitual offender, and the illegal-sentence claim was waived by meritless anyway.
(9-1-0: Judge Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Forty-One Thousand Eighty Dollars v. State, 2021-CA-00692-COA (Civil – Other/Civil Asset Forfeiture)
Affirming seizure of case, holding that the funds were subject to forfeiture, the argument that the K-9 alerted to the cash because the case was contaminated was unpersuasive, and that the forfeiture was not grossly disproportionate.
(8-1-0: Judge Westbrooks concurred in the result only without separate written opinion; Judge Emfinger did not participate.)

Simmons v. Jackson County, Mississippi, 2020-CA-01014-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Denying a motion for rehearing but substituting a new opinion, but still affirming circuit court’s ruling that the county bore no responsibility for a driver’s fatal accident that occurred when his vehicle left the road and struck a culvert, holding that there was sufficient evidence to support the circuit court’s finding that the driver’s negligence in failing to exercise vigilant caution as he drove through a work zone was the sole proximate cause of the accident.
(7-3: Judge Westbrooks dissented, joined by Judge Carlton and Judge McDonald.)

NOTE – Since the old opinion is no longer available, I am not sure what changed. Apparently what I took away as the core holding did not change because my prior summary still seems to fairly characterize the opinion.

Haidar v. Margetta, 2021-CA-00683-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the chancery court’s dismissal of a purchaser’s claim for specific performance or damages after the seller refused to honor the contract after the initial closing date passed, holding that time is not automatically of the essence in real estate transactions and there was no evidence in the record to establish that time was of the essence here.
(6-1-3: Judge Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge Greenlee dissented, joined by Chief Judge Barnes and Judge Carlton, and joined in part by Judge Westbrooks)

Other Orders

Murry v. State, 2020-KA-01363-COA (denying rehearing)

Wilson v. Lexington Manner Senior Care, LLC, 2021-CA-00072-COA (denying rehearing)

Wilson v. City of Greenville, 2021-CA-00316-COA (denying rehearing)

White v. White, 2021-CP-00333-COA (denying rehearing)

Beasley v. State, 2021-CA-00653-COA (denying rehearing)

Mitchell v. MDES, 2021-CC-00795-COA (denying pro se motion for rehearing as untimely)

Norwood v. State, 2021-CA-00802-COA (denying rehearing)

Patrick v. State, 2022-TS-00683-COA (dismissing appeal as moot)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 8, 2022

The Mississippi Court of Appeals covered a lot of territory in six opinions handed down today. They areas covered include divorce, criminal issues, MTCA police-protection immunity, third-party liability for work injuries, criminal, and one PCR case for good measure.

King v. State, 2021-CA-01145-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that there was no merit to the claim that his guilty plea was not voluntary or to his ineffective assistance claim.
(9-0: Judge Emfinger did not participate)

Owens v. State, 2021-KA-01256-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm after receiving a Lindsey brief, receiving no pro se brief, and reviewing the record and concluding no issue warranted reversal.
(9-0: Judge Smith did not participate)

Blount v. State, 2021-KA-00204-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth after a jury trial in absentia, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for a continuance after concluding that the defendant waived his right to be present at trial.
(7-1-2: Judge Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge McDonald concurred in the result only without separate written opinion; Judge McCarty dissented, joined in part by Judge McDonald.)

Practice Point – Don’t possess meth and then miss your trial date. As Bob Dylan reminds us, “To live outside the law, you just be honest.”

Alves-Hunter v. Hunter, 2021-CA-00644-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming decisions in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not commit reversible error in awarding the father standard visitation with their child, dividing the martial estate, or denial of attorneys fees after a contempt finding.
(10-0)

Tennesen v. City of Hattiesburg, 2021-CA-00137-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies/MTCA)
Affirming judgment for the defendants in a personal injury case brought under the MTCA stemming from a police chase, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the police officer did not act with reckless disregard and that the City was entitled to police-protection immunity.

Mayberry v. Cottonport Hardwoods, 2021-CA-00246-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Reversing summary judgment in favor of a defendant in a third-party lawsuit arising from a workers’ comp injury, holding that the defendant at issue was not an “up the line” contractor but instead was the owner of the project and was therefore a third-party not entitled to exclusive remedy immunity.
(6-4: Judge Carlton dissented, joined by Judge Greenlee, Judge McCarty, and Judge Smith.)

Practice Point – This is a fact-intensive opinion. It does not appear to disturb the general rule that “up the line” contractors are entitled to MWCA immunity as long as they are true contractors.

Other Orders

Moffett v. State, 2021-KA-00622-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 26, 2022

The Mississippi Court of Appeals was short on opinions and long on “housekeeping” orders today. There were two opinions affirming criminal convictions and one chancery matter dealing with division of marital assets, alimony, and custody/visitation. One of the criminal appellants made a scrappy argument that Covid deprived him of due process during his trial.

Boyd v. State, 2021-KA-00066-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of murder and one count of aggravated assault stemming from a marijuana deal that went off the rails, holding that the defendant failed to meet his burden of proving ineffective assistance of counsel amounting to a violation of constitutional rights and that review of the record showed affirmatively that his ineffective assistance claims were without merit. The meritless issues raised involved the lack of a request for a jury instruction regarding imperfect self-defense manslaughter, the lack of objection to an investigator’s testimony regarding Facebook messages and the admission of those messages as exhibits, the lack of objection to the State’s cross-examination of the defendant regarding text messages, and the lack of objection to comments by the prosecutor during closing.
(9-1-0)

Walker v. State, 2021-KA-00483-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that the evidence was sufficient even without “physical or scientific” evidence, that there was no due process violation in holding trial during the Covid pandemic, that the defendant was procedurally barred from arguing prosecutorial misconduct because he cited no evidence to support it, that there was no error in admitting testimony of two investigators, and that there was no miscarriage of justice in the prosecutor reading only a portion of a jury instruction during closing.
(10-0)

ADDENDUM – COVID and the Law: The defendant argued that fear of Covid created an urgency among the jurors that prevented them from faithfully discharging their sworn duties. This argument failed for want of evidence:

Garner v. Garner, 2021-CA-00038-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s awards following an irreconcilable differences divorce between an OB/GYN and her husband, rejecting the ex-husband’s arguments on appeal and holding that his award of 48% of the martial property was the product of a proper Ferguson analysis, that there was no error awarding him rehabilitative alimony in lieu of more “accessible cash,” and that chancellor properly applied the Albright factors in awarding sole legal and physical custody to the mother.
(9-1-0)

Other Orders

McGee v. Neel Schaffer Engineers and Planners Inc., 2020-CA-01277-COA (denying rehearing)

Magee v. State, 2020-KA-01378-COA (denying rehearing)

Haynes v. State, 2020-KA-01397-COA (denying rehearing)

Camphor v. State, 2021-CP-00048-COA (recalling mandate and accepting motion for rehearing as timely)

Jones v. State, 2021-KA-01263-COA (dismissing motion to dismiss appeal as untimely and granting appellant’s motion to proceed out-of-time)

Lawrence v. State, 2021-TS-01324-COA (granting appellant’s motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal)

Wilson v. State, 2022-TS-00268-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)

Harrell v. State, 2022-TS-00276-COA (denying appellant’s pro se motion to reinstate appeal)

Rice v. State, 2022-TS-00400-COA (affirming circuit court’s judgment)

Gutierrez v. State, 2022-TS-00459-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of appealable judgment)

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 21, 2022

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. Trial courts and appellees ran the table getting affirmed in all six cases. The opinions include resolution of appeals related to adverse possession, easements, custody, wrongful termination, PCR, and child support.

Jackson v. Mullins, 2021-CP-00495-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming summary judgment dismissing a three-ring-circus claims filed by a divorcee against the chancery court master who presided over his divorce case, together with a Mississippi Bar employee and the chairman of the Bar’s Committee on Professional Responsibility who handled a bar complaint the plaintiff filed against the special master, and an MDHS employee, holding that the trial judge who granted summary judgment was not biased and that the special master and the Bar personnel were immune from suit.
(10-0.)

Franco v. Ferrill, 2021-CA-00053-COA (Civil – Real Property/Adverse Possession)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a fact-intensive adverse possession suit, holding that the record supported the chancery court’s findings that (1) the plaintiffs adversely possessed the property, (2) the plaintiffs have proved a prescriptive easement to a lake, (3) the plaintiffs were entitled to $5,000 in damages for trespass and property damage, (4) the defendants must remove a fence of pay for fence removal, and (5) a trespass claim filed by one defendant should be denied.
(Judge McCarty concurred in part and in the result, joined by Judge Lawrence.)

Stuckey v. Stuckey, 2020-CA-00848-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision modifying a custody agreement, holding that the record supported (1) the chancellor’s determination that there has been an adverse, material change in circumstances; (2) the chancellor’s weighing of the Albright factors to conclude that primary physical custody should be changed from the mother to the father; (3) the chancellor’s decision modification of child support; and (4) the chancellor’s order requiring the mother to undergo quarterly drug testing.
(Judge McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion. Judge Wilson concurred in the result only without separate written opinion.)

Leland School District v. Brown, 2021-CA-00157-COA (Civil – Contract/Wrongful Termination)
Affirming on direct appeal and cross-appeal the chancellor’s ruling in a wrongful termination claim, holding (1) that the chancellor properly denied a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, (2) that the chancellor properly found that the school board’s decision upholding the plaintiff’s termination was not supported by substantial evidence and was arbitrary and capricious, and (3) that the chancellor did not err in denying attorney’s fees.
(10-0.)

Brumfield v. State, 2020-CP-01271-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of the plaintiff’s motion for PCR, holding that the plaintiff did not meet his burden in challenging the timeliness of his probation revocation hearing.
(10-0.)

Kelley v. Zitzelberger, 2021-CA-00119-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations/Child Support/Visitation)
Affirming the chancellor’s decisions pertaining to child support and visitation modifications, holding that (1) the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in denying the father’s request for child support reduction or in refusing to enforce the parties’ oral agreement to reduce child support, (2) the chancellor’s decision that the father was not entitled to have voluntary payments for extracurricular activities credited to his child support arrearage was not clearly erroneous, and (3) the chancellor’s decision modifying visitation was not manifestly wrong or clearly erroneous. The Court of Appeals also denied the mother’s motion for fees and damages under Miss. R. App. 38.
(Judge Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Other Orders

Mingo v. McComb School District, 2020-CA-00022-COA (denying rehearing)
Butler v. State, 2020-KA-00806-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List