Tag: Wills Trusts Estates

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 16, 2025

As the year draws the a close, the Mississippi Court of Appeals is finishing strong with seven opinions handed down today. There were three domestic relations cases, two felony appeals, one misdemeanor appeal, and an undue influence case.

Rasbeery v. State, 2024-KA-01005-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth with a firearm enhancement, holding that the conviction of constructive possession was supported by sufficient evidence, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that the trial court did not err in denying a motion suppress the defendant’s roadside statements.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Lucas v. Estate of Lucas, 2024-CA-01259-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision invalidating a gift and setting aside a deed, holding that the grantee did not provide sufficient evidence overcome the presumption of undue influence.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

J.T.S. v. M.L.S., 2024-CA-00023-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part a chancellor’s decision in a divorce case, holding that the Court had appellate jurisdiction, that the chancery court did not in dismissing several counts of the amended complaint, that the chancellor did err in modifying the life insurance provision of the divorce agreement, that the chancellor did not err in enforcing a provision limiting reimbursement of medical expenses, that the chancellor did not err in assessing post-judgment interest, that the chancellor did not err in finding that one party had no obligation to contribute to condo or allowance expenses, that the chancery court did not abuse its discretion in crediting payments as child support, that the chancellor did err in awarding attorney’s fees without specific findings, and that there was no merit to the claim that the chancellor was impartial.
(7-1-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence and St. Pe’ did not participate)

Turner v. State, 2024-KM-01020-COA, consolidated with 2024-KM-01028-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Affirming convictions of speeding and careless driving on appeal from justice court, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction which was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and that the trial court did not impermissibly place the burden of proof on the defendant.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Odom v. State, 2023-KA-01165-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and armed robbery, holding that the jury was not so improperly instructed on self-defense as to warrant reversal and that the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction.
(9-1-0: Wilson for the Court; Barnes concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Bradshaw v. Bradshaw, 2024-CA-00882-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment of contempt, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding the ex-husband in willful contempt for failing to pay court-ordered alimony or in reducing his monthly periodic alimony payment.
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Thornton v. Thornton, 2024-CA-00320-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s judgment in a divorce case, holding that the chancery court did not abuse its discretion awarding joint legal and physical custody, that the chancellor did not err in distribution of marital property or in personal property.
(7-1-2: Barnes for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Carlton concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McCarty)

Other Orders

  • Parra v. Rapid-American Corporation, 2023-CA-01196-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Buck v. State, 2024-KA-00025-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Tauzin v. Tauzin, 2024-CA-00141-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 9, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions yesterday. Three are appeals of felony convictions and the others are an heirship case, a worker’s comp case, and a reversal in a PCR case.

Oats v. State, 2024-KA-00278-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for mistrial after the jury declared itself hung and that the issue was doubly procedurally-barred and that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of it.
(7-3: Lawrence for the Court; McDonald dissented without writing; Westbrook dissented, joined by McDonald and Lassitter St. Pe’)

Chamblee v. State, 2024-KA-00556-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of gratification of lust, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for change of venue, in denying a motion for mistrial, in excluding false-accusation evidence, or in excluding sexually explicit photographs, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Physicians’ Pain and Spin Specialists, PLLC v. Kluczkowski, 2025-WC-00069-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s finding that the employer was subject to the MWCA and that the claimant sustained a compensable injury, holding that there was substantial evidence that the employer regularly employed at least five employees and that the claimant presented substantial evidence of a compensable injury.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

O’Callaghan v. State, 2024-KA-00415-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of possession of a controlled substance, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding holding trial in absentia or in denying the defendant’s motion for mistrial based on a juror’s remark.
(7-3-0: Carlton for the Court; Westbrooks and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Estate of Dorsey v. Matory, 2024-CA-00925-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancery court’s judgment in an heirship dispute, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that a prior adoption petition and proceeding constituted an adjudication of paternity of and legitimacy, that the adopted child was an heir-at-law of his biological father entitled to a share of his estate, or that equity favored not applying the one-year statute of limitations.
(8-2-0: Barnes for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald and McCarty)

Shelton v. State, 2024-CA-00435-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the denial of a PCR petition, holding that the circuit court clearly erred in holding that a revised State’s expert opinion does not merit reversal and that arguments regarding ineffective assistance and factual innocence are moot since the case was remanded for new trial.
(7-3: Barnes for the Court; Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Lawrence and Weddle)

Other Orders

  • Moyer v. Blades, 2023-CA-01180-COA (denying rehearing)
  • James v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport, 2024-CA-00459 (denying rehearing)
  • Snyder v. Pilger, 2024-CA_00460-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Carroll v. State, 2024-KA-00481-COA (recalling mandate and granting pro se motion for additional time to file motion for rehearing)
  • Cole v. Fish, 2024-CA-00508-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Corr Properties, LLC v. City of Oxford, 2024-CC-00665-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Graves v. State, 2024-KA-00691-COA (recalling mandate and granting pro se motion to file motion for rehearing otu of time)
  • Haddad v. State, 2025-TS-01229-COA (dismissing application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and granting time for the pro se appellat to file the motion in circuit court)
  • Reid v. State, 2025-TS-01261-COA (suspending deadling to file appeal to allow appeal to proceed on its merits)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 18, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down ten opinions today. Eight of the opinions are “new” and two of them follow a rehearing grant.

Eaglin v. Burse, 2024-CA-00808-COA (Civil – Custody)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision in a custody dispute, holding that the chancellor abused her discretion in denying a motion to continue and a motion in limine.
(9-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court; Westbrooks did not participate)

In Re Conservatorship of Mayberry: Mayberry-Johnson v. Mayberry, 2024-CA-00649-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision granting a petition to be appointed guardian and conservator of the petitioner’s husband over the objection of their daughter, holding that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion or commit clear error.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Hall v. State, 2023-KA-01363-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of conspiracy and aggravated assault, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting video and then admitting witness testimony identifying the defendant in the video.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in the result only without writing)

Longino v. State, 2024-KA-00772-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in excluding the defendant’s complete law enforcement interview or in prohibiting the defendant’s father from testifying regarding the defendant’s history of mental health and treatment.
(9-1-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Clarksdale Municipal School District Board of Trustees v. Montgomery, 2024-CA-00611-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision to reverse the school board’s decision upholding a teacher’s contract non-renewal, holding that because the teacher did not comply with the statute’s requirements no hearing was necessary for the school board to uphold the non-renewal.
(9-1: McCarty for the Court; McDonald dissented without writing)

Manning v. State, 2024-CP-00853-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s order denying a motion for PCR based on a finding that it was successive.
(5-1-4: Lawrence for the Court; McCarty concurred in part without writing; Wilson and McDonald dissented in part without writing; Westbrooks dissented, joined by Barnes and McDonald and joined in part by Wilson and McCarty.)

McKnight v. State, 2024-KA-00779-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a weapon by a habitual offender, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to give a jury instruction proposed by the defendant because it was an inaccurate statement of the law or in denying a new trial.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Yates v. State, 2024-KA-00371-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of a dwelling, holding that claim of error in excluding testimony was procedurally barred for lack of a proffer and that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence.
(9-1-0: Wilson for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing)

Taylor v. State, 2023-CA-00738-COA (Civil – PCR)
Granting a motion for rehearing and reversing the trial court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction when it sentenced a man to a term that exceeded the maximum and that its actions in doing so are void.
(8-2: McCarty for the Court; Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Wilson dissented, joined by Emfinger)

Note – Here is how the Court summarized its holding:

McDonald v. Pruwitt, 2023-CA-01312-COA (Civil – Custody)
Granting rehearing and affirming the chancellor’s findings regarding the statutory criteria for grandparent visitation rights but reversing and remanding for specific findings regarding the Martin factors.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Nelson v. State, 2023-CP-00647-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Walker v. State, 2023-KA-01012-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Howard v. Howard, 2023-CA-01029-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Briggs v. Jackson, 2023-CA-01241-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Gombak0-Amos v. Amos, 2023-CA_01253-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Brodie v. Brodie, 2023-CA-01397-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Bhatti v. Board of Supervisors of Coahoma County, Mississippi, 2024-CA-00027-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Martin v. Martin, 2024-CA-00222-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Pickens v. State, 2025-TS-01084-COA (suspending Rule 4(a)’s deadline and allowing the appeal to proceed on the merits)
  • Lee v. State, 2025-TS-01099-COA (finding pro se response to show-cause notice well-taken and allowing appeal to proceed)
  • Fisher v. State, 2025-TS-01174-COA (granting appellant’s pro se motion to proceed out-of-time)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 13, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions yesterday. There was also an order dismissing an appeal as untimely based on a defect in a motion for reconsideration filed with the trial court that is worth a quick read.

Mohiuddin v. Jackson County, 2024-CA-00759-SCT (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s judgment upholding the Board of Supervisor’s approval of a special exception to a zoning ordinance, holding that the Board’s interpretation of its zoning ordinance was correct and that is decision granting a special exception was not arbitrary and capricious and was supported by substantial evidence.
(9-0: Branning for the Court)

Miller v. State, 2024-KA-00804-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding the indictment was not defective and that the defense was not prejudiced by the State’s amendment of the indictment.
(7-1-0: Griffis for the Court; King concurred in result only without writing)

Thompson v. Estate of Lee, 2025-CA-00286-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision in a claim brought against an estate by the former clients of the decedent regarding misappropriated client funds, holding that the chancellor erred in dismissing the clients’ claims where the court had previously ruled that MDL funds at issue belonged to the clients and erred in finding that the former clients were required to maintain a judgment against the decedent or his estate to recover their funds that he held in trust.
(8-1: Chamberlin for the Court; Randolph concurred in result only without writing)

Busby v. State, 2024-KA-00482-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sale of a Schedule II substance, holding that there was no Confrontation Clause violation where the trial court admitted testimony from a drug-analyst expert to testify that the substance sold was methamphetamine and admitted the law report through that expert where the expert was the technical reviewer and not the initial analyst.
(5-4: Maxwell for the Court; Coleman concurred in result only, joined by King, Ishee, and Sullivan.)

Other Orders

  • P.K. Loyacono, PLLC v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., 2024-CA-00791-SCT (granting motion to dismiss appeal from final judgment for lack of jurisdiction)

Practice Point – This Order is a cautionary tale. A “motion for reconsideration” that does not state grounds for relief does not toll the appeal deadline:

In Re: Advisory Committee on Rules, 89-R-99016-SCT (reappointing the following persons for three-year terms (1/1/26 to 12/31/28) as members of the Advisory Committee on Rules: Hon. Crystal Wise Martin, Hon. Celeste Embrey Wilson, David P. Pitre, Esq., Corey Clayton Cranford, Esq., Lance L. Stevens, Esq., and Katherine S. Kerby, Esq.)

  • Jones v. State, 2022-CT-01124-SCT (denying cert)
  • Davis v. State, 2023-CT-00811-SCT (denying cert)
  • Lee v. Doolittle, 2023-CT-00969-SCT (granting cert)
  • Phinizee v. State, 2023-CT-01090-SCT (denying cert)
  • Fortner v. IMS Engineers, Inc., 2023-CT-01170-SCT (denying cert)
  • Smith v. State, 2024-CT-00162-SCT (denying cert)
  • Underwood v. State, 2024-CT-00423-SCT (dismissing cert petition as untimely)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 4, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down ten opinions yesterday. The Court covered a lot of ground including wills,the MTCA, felony convictions, an arbitration award, and arbitration agreement enforceability.

Pittman v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., 2024-CA-00619-COA (Civil – Torts)
Reversing the circuit court’s grant of a motion to compel arbitration, holding that the circuit court erred in finding that the plaintiff was a third-party beneficiary of an arbitration agreement.
(9-1: Weddle for the Court; Wilson dissented)

Ward v. State, 2024-KA-00341-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after a judgment of convictions of voyeurism and first-degree murder, holding that trial counsel was not ineffective for not requesting a severance or for failing to object to the State’s peremptory strikes and that the evidence was sufficient to support each of the convictions, but holding that the circuit court erred in refusing a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction.
(7-3: Emfinger for the Court; Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Lawrence concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Carlton and Westbrooks, joined in part by Wilson)

Roberts v. State, 2024-CA-00988-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that because only one petition for revocation of Roberts’s PRS had been filed, the circuit court did not have the authority to impose her full sentence under section 47-7-37.
(6-4*-1: McDonald for the Court; Emfinger specially concurred, joined by Barnes, Weddle, and Lassitter St. Pe’, joined in part by Lawrence and McCarty; Wilson concurred in result only without writing; Lawrence dissented, joined in part by Emfinger and Weddle)

Fields v. State, 2024-KA-01204-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of twenty-five counts of child exploitation, holding searches of the defendants laptops in Harrison County pursuant to a George County warrant were proper, and holding that the defendant cannot complain on appeal about the absence of a jury instruction his counsel strategically withdrew.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Williams v. State, 2024-KA-00257-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that any error in limiting evidence related to the victim’s character did not warrant reversal in light of other evidence of guilt.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks for the Court; Wilson and Emfinger concur in result only without writing)

Jones v. Madison County Nursing Home, 2024-CA-00561-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the dismissal of a suit against a nursing home, holding that it was time-barred because it was filed outside of the MTCA’s one-year statute of limitations, holding that the County was not estopped from asserting the statute of limitations defense after the Board of Supervisors had responded to a pre-suit notice letter stating that the county was not a proper party.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Chavers v. State, 2024-KA-00551-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of manslaughter and one count of aggravated assault after driving a UTV into a group of people leaving a party, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in giving a voluntary intoxication instruction, that the circuit court’s error in giving the jury the wrong set of jury instructions that error was harmless because it was corrected during deliberations, and that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence.
(9-0: Wilson for the Court; Lawrence did not participate)

Estate of Fleishhacker: Ward v. Edwards, 2024-CA-00418-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision denying in a will contest, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying a request to probate a lost holographic will and finding an earlier will valid.
(7-2-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Practice Point – Though it did not affect the holding in the case, the Court held that the trial court erred in finding that one witness’s testimony was insufficient under section 91-7-10 because she was the primary beneficiary under the purported will. But the Court of Appeals noted that neither the chancellor nor the parties accounted for the repeal of the Dead Man’s Statute.

Gillespie Funeral Home, LLC v. Magnolia Guaranty Life Insurance Company, 2024-CA-00427-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision after an arbitration award, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying a motion to set aside an arbitration award or in entering a final judgment confirming the award.
(9-1-0: Barnes for the Court; McDonald concurred in the result only without writing)

Sanford v. State, 2024-KA-00683-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming a conviction of gratification of lust, statutory rape, and sexual battery, holding that the argument that the circuit judge should have recused himself after he was contacted by the victim’s father prior to trial was waived and without merit where the judge said he explained to the father that the could not talk about matters that could come before the court.
(9-1-0: Barnes for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Younger v. Southern, 2022-CA-01228-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Mangum v. State, 2023-KA-01198-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Morsi v. JB Hunt Corp., 2024-WC-00399-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of October 2, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One is a statute of frauds case and the other is an estate case involving real property. The latter includes a six-vote special concurrence.

Palmer’s Grocery Inc. v. Chandler’s JKE, Inc., 2024-IA-00194-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment on seven of ten claims stemming from the sale of a grocery store that fell through, holding that the plaintiffs complaint plausibly invoked the merchants’ exception and the part-performance exception to the Statute of Frauds.
(9-0: Ishee for the Court)

Practice Point – This one provides a good opportunity to brush up on the Statute of Frauds.

In the Matter of the Estate of Johnson: Manners v. Estate of Johnson, 2023-CT-00823-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the Court of Appeals and reinstating the judgment of the chancery court in an estate matter, holding that an Article of Agreement signed by the decedent did not operate as a deed was not a foundation for the basis of a claim against the estate.
(5-6*-3: Branning for the Court; Randolph specially concurred, joined by Maxwell, Ishee, Griffis, Sullivan, and Branning; Coleman dissented, joined by King and Chamberlin)

Practice Point – Chief Justice Randolph’s special concurrence garnered votes form five other justices, giving it precedential effect, however limited its reach may be. The special concurrence stated that Justice Branning’s “opinion is unassailably correct and consistent with the Court’s precedent” and took issue with the dissent.

Other Orders

  • In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (amending Appendix A to the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure to add the attached form subpoenas as follows: Exhibit A as Form 6, Exhibit B as Form 7, and Exhibit C as Form 8.)
  • In Re: Commission on Continuing Legal Education, 89-R-99011-SCT (granting Expedited Petition to Amend the Rules and Regulations for Mandatory Continuing Legal Education and the Amended Expedited Petition to Amend the Rules and Regulations for Mandatory Continuing Legal Education filed by the Mississippi Commission on Continuing Legal Education as set forth in Exhibit A.)
  • Clark v. State, 2022-DR-00829-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • United Services Automobile Association v. Estate of Minor, 2023-CA-000490SCT (denying rehearing by equally divided Court with Coleman not participating)
  • Chambers v. State, 2023-CT-00626-SCT (denying cert)
  • Craft v. State, 2023-CT-00915-SCT (denying cert)
  • Terry v. State, 2023-CT-00979-SCT (denying cert)
  • Rodriguez v. Diamondhead Country Club and Property Owners Association Inc., 2024-SCT-00238-SCT (denying cert)
  • Summers v. Big Black Land & Timber Company, LLC, 2025-M-00366-SCT (denying petition for interlocutory appeal)
  • Arnold v. Staffney, 2025-IA-00562-SCT (granting interlocutory appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of September 11 and September 18, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions on September 11 and two more on September 18. I think the most significant of the bunch is Pilot Travel Centers, LLC v. Womack where the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and granted a new trial in a premises liability case because improper expert testimony was admitted.

September 11, 2025

Patterson v. State, 2024-CA-00788-SCT (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing an MTCA wrongful death claim, holding that the immunity requirements of Section 11-46-9(1)(l) were met and that the statute passed constitutional muster.
(9-0: Sullivan for the Court)

Watkins Construction v. Miss. Dept. of Revenue, 2024-SA-00662-SCT (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision denying a taxpayer’s motion for summary judgment “for reconsideration, clarification, and alternative relief,” finding that the chancellor properly denied the company’s post-judgment request and declining to “give advisory opinions about unraised legal questions.”
(9-0: Maxwell for the Court)

Other Orders

  • The Mississippi Bar v. Valley, 2008-BD-01884-SCT (granting motion to reopen case and file amended formal complaint)
  • Shelton v. State, 2010-M-01801 (denying petition to review issues re: possible judicial and/or criminal misconduct for possible impeachment and/or prosecution directed at the trial judge, finding that the filing was frivolous, and restricting the petitioner from filing in forma pauperis)
  • In Re: Judicial Election Oversight Committee, 2021-M-01306-SCT (appointing Spence Flatgard, James H. Heidelberg, and David F. Delgado to four-year terms as members of the judicial election oversight committee)
  • Carr v. State, 2023-DR-00503-SCT (granting motion to vacate stay and granting open time motions and giving 30 days to file post-conviction application)

Hand Down Page

September 18, 2025

In Re Estate of Ivision: Malouf & Malouf, PLLC v. Estate of Ivison, 2024-CA-00421-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancery court’s denial of a motion for payment of past due interest, holding that this second probated claim for compound interest was a new claim and was untimely filed.
(9-0: Griffis for the Court)

Pilot Travel Centers, LLC v. Womack, 2023-CT-00035-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing the Court of Appeals’ decision that held that the trial court’s error admitting expert testimony was harmless, holding that the expert was unqualified and his testimony was unhelpful where he read the defendant’s policies and identified alleged violations of them.
(9-0: Chamberlin for the Court)

Practice Point – This is a big Daubert case (though the opinion did not cite Daubert). The Supreme Court agreed with the Court of Appeals that admitting the expert testimony was error, but the Supremes held it was not harmless. The Court adopted the rationale from Judge Wilson’s Court of Appeals dissent:

Other Orders

  • Crawford v. State, 2024-DR-01386-SCT (granting the State’s motion to dismiss a petition for post-conviction relief)
  • Galloway v. State, 2025-DR-00129-SCT (granting the State’s motion to dismiss successive motion for leave to proceed)
  • In Re: Rules of Discipline for the Mississippi Bar, 89-R-99010-SCT (appointing Robert R. Morris III as member of the Complaint Tribunal)
  • Crawford v. State, 24-DP-01016-SCT (granting renewed motion to set execution date)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of June 5, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two decisions today. One opinion reversed the chancellor’s rulings in an estate matter and the other reversed the Court of Appeals and reinstated a judgment of conviction.

In Re Estate of Brent: Mays v. Estate of Brent, 2023-CA-00423-SCT (Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision giving the ex-wife’s Estate an award for unpaid alimony, holding that the chancellor erred by denying the ex-husband Estate credit for partial alimony payments and for life insurance proceeds which resulted in credits exceeding the total amount owed leaving no unpaid alimony.
(9-0: Ishee for the Court)

Allen v. State, 2022-CT-00419-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing the Court of Appeals and reinstating the judgment of the Yazoo County Circuit Court’s convicting the defendant of six counts of statutory rape, holding that the invited-error doctrine applied because the trial court gave the instructions the defendant requested, that there was no merit to the ineffective-assistance-0f-counsel claim, that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence, that the defendant waived objections to the application of the tender-years exception, and that the trial court did not err in denying a Batson challenge.
(6-3: Maxwell for the Court; King dissented, joined in part by Coleman and Sullivan; Coleman dissented, joined by Sullivan)

Other Orders

  • In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (granting motion to amend M.R.C.P. forms)
  • In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (granting motion to amend M.R.C.P. 13)
  • In Re: MEC’s Administrative Procedures,  89-R-99040-SCT (dismissing petition to amend Mississippi Rules of Court by MEC director)
  • In Re: Uniform Procedures for Data Collection Matters in Circuit, Chancery and County Courts,89-R-99042-SCT (dismissing petition to amend Mississippi Rules of Court by MEC director)
  • Smith v. State, 2019-DR-01492-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Tisdale v. South Central Regional Medical Center, 2023-CT-00231-SCT (denying cert)
  • Hunter v. State, 2023-KA-01246-SCT (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of May 15 and May 22, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions between last week and this week. One of today’s cases reversed the 12(b)(6) dismissal of a third-party-assault premises case in the face of the Landowners Protection Act that just might end up stirring the premises liability pot. There is also an interesting champerty decision answering a certified question from the Fifth Circuit.

May 15, 2025

Crabtree v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company, 2024-FC-00827-SCT (Civil – Federally Certified Question)
Answering a certified quest from the Fifth Circuit, holding that Miss. Code Ann. § 97-9-11 (Rev. 2020) prohibits a disinterested third party engaged by a bankruptcy creditor from purchasing a cause of action from a debtor’s estate.
(5-4)

Other Orders

  • In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (granting rules committee’s motion to withdraw motion to amend Rule 7)
  • Chamberlin v. State, 2022-DR-00546-SCT (denying successor petition for PCR)
  • Short v. The Break Land Company, LLC, 2022-CT-01180-SCT (denying cert)
  • Carr v. State, 2023-DR-00503-SCT (directing Anthony Carr to notify the Court within 30 days of the federal district court’s ruling on the State’s motion; and that, until the federal district court rules on the motion to lift stay, Carr is directed to submit every 90 days from the entry of this order a status report on the posture of the federal case)

Hand Down Page

May 22, 2025

In the Matter of the Estate of Tatum: Haynie v. Estate of Tatum, 2023-CA-01366-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Dismissing appeal as moot, holding that a decision on the chancery court’s rulings involving the public sale of a one-half interest in a land and cattle company would be of no practical benefit to the appellant because the United States will receive any additional funds over and above what the appellant has already received.
(9-0)

Doby v. South Park Village Apartments, 2023-CA-01094-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of a personal injury, holding that under the state’s notice pleading standard the complaint sufficiently pleaded a negligence claim against an apartment complex after one of the plaintiffs was shot on the premises, but affirming dismissal as to the other plaintiff because the complaint contained no allegations as to him.
(9-0)

Practice Point – This is an fascinating result in an area of premises liability seems to have been gutted by the Landowners Protection Act that became law in 2019:

Other Orders

  • Harris v. State, 2023-CT-00460-SCT (denying cert)
  • Dollar General Corporation v. Dobbs, 2023-IA-00617-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Lenoir v. State, 2023-IA-01181-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Doukas v. Kiln Self Storage, 2023-CT-01195-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 6, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There are several felonies, a wrongful death summary judgment case, a workers’ compensation intoxication case, a wills and estate case, and a few PCR cases. Interestingly enough, the last two PCR cases resulted in voting-line-soup pluralities.

Carr v. State, 2024-KA-00185-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of fondling and sexual battery, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying funding for a defense expert, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony about other alleged prior bad acts, that one conviction of fondling did not merge with the conviction of sexual battery, and that the indictment was not insufficient for the defendant to prepare an adequate defense.
(9-1-0: St. Pe’ opinion; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Smith v. State, 2024-KA-00162-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of ten counts of possession of child pornography but reversing convictions of two counts of sexual battery, holding that the evidence was not sufficient to support the sexual battery convictions, but that the doctrine of retroactive misjoinder did not require reversal of the other convictions and remanded to reconsider sentencing.
(10-0: Weddle opinion)

Good v. Sanders, 2023-CA-00669-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in a wrongful death case where a pedestrian was struck and killed by a driver, holding that there was no evidence that the defendant breached any duty owed to the pedestrian and that the trial judge did not abuse her discretion in not recusing herself.
(7-3*-0: Lawrence opinion; Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by Weddle and St. Pe’ and joined in part by McCarty; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Ruffin v. State, 2024-CA-00867-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion where the petitioner failed to include a supporting affidavit with her PCR motion and acknowledged at her plea hearing that she was freely and voluntarily admitting her guilt.
(9-1-0: McDonald opinion; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Estate of Anderson: Brown v. Fitzgerald, 2023-CA-01131-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision setting aside a deed and ordering conveyance pursuant to the will, holding that substantial evidence supports the chancellor’s findings that the testator suffered from a weakness of intellect and the consideration for the deed was grossly inadequate.
(10-0: Wilson opinion)

Nicolaou v. State, 2023-CP-01007-COA (Civil – PCR)
Vacating the circuit court’s denial of a PCR motion as successive because the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate it.
(10-0: Carlton opinion)

Ladner v. Hinton Homes LLC, 2024-WC-00941-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s decision that a claim was not compensable under the intoxication provision, holding that substantial evidence supported the MWCC’s finding that the claimant failed to prove that intoxication was not a contributing cause of the accident.
(8-2-0: Carlton opinion; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Taylor v. State, 2023-CA-00738-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a PCR motion, holding that although the sentence exceeded the maximum the PCR motion was barred by the statute of limitations.
(3-2-5: Wilson principal opinion; Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence concurred in part and in the result, joined by Emfinger, Weddle, and Set. Pe’, and joined in part by Westbrooks and McCarty; McDonald dissented without writing; McCarty dissented, joined by Barnes, Carlton, Westbrooks, and McDonald.)

Underwood v. State, 2024-CP-00423-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the claims that the petitioner’s plea was involuntary and that his attorney rendered ineffective assistance.
(4-1-4: McCarty principal opinion; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; Lawrence concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Wilson, Emfinger, and St. Pe’; Weddle did not participate.)

Other Orders

  • Nailer v. State, 2023-KA-00627-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page