Tag: Zoning

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 31, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals closed out the month with eleven opinions yesterday. The decisions cover felonies, workers’ comp, real property, termination of parental rights, domestic abuse protection order, heirship, foreclosure/service of process, rezoning , and PCR.

Muhammad v. State, 2024-KA-00440-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of one count of aggravated domestic violence, holding that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of prior bad acts and that the defendant was prejudiced by the ruling.
(8-1-1: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court; Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without writing; Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Braxton v. State, 2025-CP-00051-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the arguments were waived by pleading guilty.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Morris v. State, 2024-CP-00580-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the summary denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a preliminary hearing and that the substantive arguments were without merit.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Jones v. Brown, 2025-CA-00031-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision on a petition to determine heirs, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the putative heir did not prove heirship by clear and convincing evidence.
(6-4-0: Emfinger for the Court; McCarty and Weddle concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Sievers v. Faucheaux-Sievers, 2024-CA-01112-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision issuing a new domestic abuse protection order, holding that the chancellor did not abuse her discretion in entering a final protection order and that the defendant was not entitled to a voluntary dismissal.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson concurred in result only without writing)

Armstrong v. State, 2024-KA-01217-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two drug charges, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress evidence found pursuant to two search warrants.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

J.R.M. v. Warren County Dept. of CPS, 2024-CA-00984-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the youth court’s termination of parental rights, holding that there was sufficient evidence to support the youth court’s finding that the father failed to exercise reasonable visitation.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Smith v. Dennis Wright & Son Plumbing, 2025-WC-00046-COA (Civil – Workers’ Compensation)
Affirming the Commission’s decision, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that the claimant did not sustain a compensable left shoulder injury.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Note/Disclosure – I handled this appeal for the Employer/Carrier.

Taylor v. State, 2024-KA-00280-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of sexual battery and one count of gratification of lust against a minor, holding that the arguments that the indictment was defective for overbreadth and vagueness were waived and without merit, that arguments that hearsay testimony was not properly admitted for lack of a proper tender-years hearing were waived and without merit, and that arguments that the State improperly bolstered testimony was waived for lack of objection.
(9-1-0: Barnes for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

OneWest Bank, FSB v. Brown-Wood, 2024-CA-01125-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a foreclosure matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in granting a motion to set aside a prior order granting an extension of time to serve process, denying a motion for leave to amend, or in dismissing a complaint for judicial foreclosure.
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Feather v. City of Saltillo, 2024-CA-00831-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision to affirm the City’s approval of a rezoning application, holding that the Board’s decision that a public need existed was “fairly debatable” and would not be disturbed on appeal.
(5-4: Westbrooks for the Court; Emfinger dissented without writing; Wilson dissented, jioned by Carlton, McCarty, and Emfinger; Weddle did not participate)

Other Orders

  • J.T.S. v. M.L.S., 2024-CA-00023-COA (denying rehearing)
  • CNRS&Z Inc., v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, 2024-CA-00365-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Shelton v. State, 2024-CA-00435-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Chavers v. State, 2024-KA-00551-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Estate of Dorsey v. Matory, 2024-CA-00925-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Rasbeery v. State, 2024-KA-01005-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 16, 2024

The annual July hiatus is over and the Mississippi Court of Appeals is back today with nine opinions. There are four direct criminal appeals, including one reversal of a murder conviction. There are three real property cases, one involving a partition, one an administrative condemnation decision, and the other a landowner’s right to keep horses on her property within city limits. There is also a custody modification decision and a PCR decision. (If you notice a missing tenth judge on these cases, Judge Greenlee’s retirement from the court was effective July 1, 2024.)

JDB Rentals, LLC v. City of Verona, 2023-CA-00431-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision affirming the board of aldermen decision administratively condemning three of rental properties, holding that the exclusionary rule prohibited consideration of evidence the code-enforcement officer obtained incident to an unconstitutional search of property.
(8-1-0: Carlton concurred in result only without writing)

Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00636-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and shooting into a motor vehicle, holding that the trial court did not err by not striking four potential jurors because none of the four was seated on the jury.
(8-1-0: McDonald concurred in the result only without writing)

Shanks v. State, 2023-CP-00271-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion seeking relief from a 2003 guilty plea, holding that the claims were not subject to any exception and did not involved the parole board.
(9-0)

Wade v. Simmons Erosion Control, Inc., 2023-CA-00733-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision dividing a large tract of land between two landowners, holding that the chancellor did not commit manifest error by accepting and approving a special master’s report and choosing one of the partition options presented by the special master.
(9-0)

Sinquefield v. The City of Ridgeland, 2022-CA-01276-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision that affirmed the City’s unanimous (no nays) decision that a landowner lacked the requisite acreage to maintain two horses on her property, holding that the City had to be reined in because its interpretation of the ordinance was not based on substantial evidence and was arbitrary and capricious where the owner had ponied up and acquired possessory interest in adjacent tracts.
(6-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without trotting out a written opinion; Barnes and Emfinger did not participate)

Herrington v. State, 2022-KA-00691-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record that there were no issues that warranted reversal.
(8-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Littleton v. State, 2023-KA-00239-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing the conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the circuit court erred in admitting a recorded statement of a witness where the witness was not called giving the defendant no opportunity to cross-examine the witness in violation of the Confrontation Clause, that the admission of the statement was not harmless error, and that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to give the proposed defense instruction stating the jury’s duty to acquit should it find that the defendant acted in necessary self-defense.
(6-3-0: Lawrence and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in result only without writing)

NOTE – Here is a summary of the court’s holding that the admission of the statement was error from paragraph 42 of the opinion:

Wells v. State, 2022-KA-00707-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of conspiracy to commit murder and first-degree murder, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-0)

May v. Brown, 2023-CA-00624-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s child-custody modification order, holding that substantial evidence supported the modification giving the father primary care, control, and custody of the minor.
(8-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Estate of Green v. Michini, 2022-CA-00365-COA (denying motions for rehearing)
  • Rambo v. Kelly Natural Gas Pipelines, LLC, 2023-WC-00402-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page