The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions today. There is one med mal case that is a civil procedure/amendment case. There is a decision addressing the application of the “malicious conduct” exception to the peer review and quality assurance privileges. There is also a direct criminal appeal and a foreclosure case. There were also two interesting cert grants.
Franklin County Memorial Hospital v. Fairman, 2021-IA-01283-SCT (Civil – Medical Malpractice)
Affirming denial of a motion to dismiss on statute of limitations grounds, holding that Rule 21 does not require a court order when an amended complaint could otherwise be filed as a matter of course and the amendment merely corrects the misidentification of a defendant and that such an amendment relates back to the date of initial filing.
(9-0)
Rush v. Rush Health Systems, Inc., 2020-IA-01116-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Dismissing and remanding after receiving the trial court’s discovery order entered in response to a prior remand, addressing only a question of law and adopting a standard to determine when a physician is entitled to production of information protected by Sections 41-63-9, -23, and -45 under the malicious conduct exception.
(9-0)
NOTE – Here is the standard in all its glory:
Eaton v. State, 2021-KA-01334-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder and aggravated assault, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting a glass pipe into evidence and that the convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and not against the overwhelming weight of it.
(9-0)
WBL SPO I, LLC v. West Town Bank & Trust, 2021-CA-00792-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming on direct appeal and cross appeal, holding that a junior creditor had no legal remedy entitling it to “equitable credit” in the form of money damages from the foreclosing creditor in the amount of the difference in the foreclosing creditor’s purchase price and the alleged market value of the property and the dismissal of the foreclosing creditor’s counterclaim for tortious interference with business relations.
(5-4-0: Kitchens concurred in result only, joined by Randolph, King, and Chamberlin)
PRACTICE POINT – You can’t appeal without a ruling, and it’s your job to secure a ruling:
Other Orders
In Re: Mississippi Rules of Criminal Procedure, 89-R-99038-SCT (denying motion to amend Miss. R. Crim. P. 5 and 8 but amending the Miss. R. Crim. P. on the Court’s own motion)
In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2023-AD-00001-SCT (order directing the disbursement of $189,074.60 in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services)
Rush v. Rush Health Systems, Inc., 2020-IA-01116-SCT (denying motion to supplement the record and motion to file exhibits under seal)
Howard Industries, Inc. v. Hayes, 2021-CT-00694-SCT (granting cert)
NOTE – Here is my summary of the 5-4 COA opinion (Wilson wrote the partial dissent).
Loblolly Properties LLC v. Le Papillon Homeowner’s Association Inc., 2021-CT-00767-SCT (granting cert)
NOTE – This is a case I had put on “cert watch” when a fractured COA (3-3-4) affirmed the lower court and a Wilson-penned dissent raised some big issues. Here is my summary of the COA opinion.
Mississippi Appeals Blog 