Our appellate courts are back in action after the standard summer hand-down break centered around the Mississippi Bar Convention. The Mississippi Court of Appeals strikes first with six opinions today.
Lewis v. State, 2025-CP-00341-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a PCR motion, holding of the trial court did not err in revoking post-release supervision.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)
White v. White, 2025-CP-00575-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision to award joint legal and physical custody, holding that the decision was supported by substantial credible evidence.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)
In the Matter of the Estate of Gibson: Vanderford v. Estate of Gibson, 2024-CA-01355-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s denial of a petition to adjudicate paternity, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding the petition untimely.
(8-2-0: McCarty for the Court; Barnes concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in result only without writing)
In the Matter of the Estate of Manyfield: Ogden & Associates, PLLC v. Sweet, 2025-CA-00417-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision denying a lien for attorney fees, holding that the chancellor abused his discretion and remanding for an apportionment of fees.
(8-2-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson and MacDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)
Davis v. Davis, 2025-CA-00363-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s custody decision, holding that the chancellor did not err in awarding custody to the mother despite the father’s arguments that the mother’s mental health was not properly considered.
(9-1-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)
In the Interest of T.L. a Minor: Jessica L. v. Forrest County Department of the Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services, 2024-CA-00385-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the Youth Court’s decision terminating parental rights, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the decision, that the youth court properly found that CPS made reasonable reunification efforts, and that there was no merit to the mother’s argument that her counsel was ineffective.
(5-2-3: Barnes for the Court; Carlton and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; McCarty concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks and joined in part by McDonald)
Other Orders
- Moore v. Sta-Home Health Agency of Carthage, Inc., 2023-CA-01267-COA (denying rehearing)
- Turner v. City of Tupelo, 2024-CA-01146-COA (denying rehearing)
- Gardner v. State, 2025-KA-00298-COA (denying rehearing)
- Rudd v. State, 2025-CP-00618-COA (denying rehearing)
Mississippi Appeals Blog 