Author: Madison Taylor

Shareholder at Wilkins Patterson in Mississippi handling appeals as well as all stages of liability and workers' compensation matters. Admitted to the bar in Mississippi, Tennessee, and North Carolina.

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 23, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions yesterday. There is a workers’ comp case, a divorce case, a direct criminal appeal, and an MDOC appeal.

White v. The Home Depot, 2022-WC-00894-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s decisions related to alleged work injuries, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s denial of the claimant’s request to change physicians, to continue medical treatment, and to receive indemnity benefits as to the first alleged injury, and to support the Commission’s finding that the second alleged injury was not compensable under the MWCA.
(10-0)

Brecheen v. Brecheen, 2022-CA-00190-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s rulings in a divorce proceeding on direct appeal and cross-appeal, holding that the chancellor did not abuse her discretion restricting the place and condition of the father’s visits based on a history of domestic violence, using paycheck stubs from the father’s previous employment to calculate child support, classifying the father’s severance package as marital property, or allowing the father to claim the minor child for tax purposes every other year.
(10-0)

Mai v. State, 2022-KA-00798-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of fondling a child, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, that the circuit court did not err in refusing a jury instruction that was not supported by Mississippi case law, and that the defendant’s failure to obtain a ruling on his objection to the admission of Rule 404(b) waived the argument on appeal.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Clark v. McDonald, 2022-CP-01296-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming a series of affirmances of a finding that an inmate violated a rule against assault by stabbing another inmate with a shiv, holding that there was no violation of the inmate’s procedural due process rights.
(10-0)

Other Orders

  • MDHS v. Johnson, 2022-SA-00605-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Harper v. State, 2022-KA-00659-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Hills v. Manns, 2022-CA-00774-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Barefield v. Barefield, 2022-CA-00834-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Forrest v. State, 2022-KA-00844-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of Late

Because of a string of litigation deadlines followed by a blessed week out of the office last week, I am behind on summaries. It has been a relatively slow month for hand downs in terms of volume from the Mississippi Supreme Court, so I am consolidating the last few weeks in this one post.

April 2, 2024 (a bonus Tuesday decision)

Barker v. Ivory, 2024-EC-00347-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision finding that a would-be candidate for Alderman was not qualified, holding that issues regarding the validity of the petition to object were procedurally barred and that the trial court’s decision that he failed to satisfy the two-year residency requirement was supported by sufficient evidence in the record.
(9-0)

April 4, 2024

State of Mississippi v. Aldrich, 2022-SA-01088-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancery court’s ruling in favor of a private landowner in a dispute over whether an acre of Mississippi coastal land was properly designated as State-owned tidelands, holding that the secretary of state had failed to following statutory guidelines in drafting the maps and failed to meet its burden of proof that the artificial filling was not the product of the deposition of oyster shells and dredge spoils.
(7-1-0: Kitchens concurred in part and in the result without writing; Randolph did not participate)

Archie v. State, 2022-KA-00326-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of conspiracy and capital murder, holding that the defendant was entitled to an instruction on his alibi theory of defense but that the trial court’s error refusing of that instruction was harmless error, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing the defendant’s proposed reasonable doubt instruction on the basis that it was cumulative, that the trial court did not err by admitting photos of the defendant that were authenticated by a witness other than the photographer, that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that the ineffective assistance of counsel claim was without merit.
(5-4: Coleman dissented, joined by Kitchens, King, and Ishee)

NOTE – The dissent asserted that Mississippi law required an alibi instruction and that the failure to give the alibi instruction could not be harmless error.

Hayes v. Thomas,  2023-EC-00229-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Reversing the circuit court’s grant of a default judgment a year after an election contest was filed questioning the vote count, holding that a default judgment was not permissible in this general election contest (per section 23-15-951) and that the petitioner’s failure to diligently prosecute her contest required dismissal with prejudice.
(9-0)

April 11, 2024

– No opinions (other orders are below)

April 18, 2024

Robinson v. State, 2023-KA-00184-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of heat-of-passion manslaughter, holding that whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a right-to-stand-your-ground jury instruction could not be analyzed on direct appeal based on direct appeal and holding that the State’s evidence was sufficient disprove the defendant’s self-defense claim.
(9-0)

Other Orders

April 4, 2024

  • Odom v. State, 2021-CT-00676-SCT (denying cert)
  • D.W. v. C.E., 2021-IA-01075-SCT (dismissing interloc as moot)
  • Hobby v. Ott, 2021-CT-01305-SCT (denying cert)
  • Pickle v. State, 2022-CT-00929-SCT (dismissing cert petition as untimely)

April 11, 2024

  • Smith v. State, 2020-CT-00774-SCT (denying cert)
  • Carpenter v. State, 2022-CT-00398-SCT (denying cert)
  • Hall v. State, 2022-CT-01097-SCT (denying cert)
  • Pryer v. State, 2023-M-01230-SCT (denying pro se petition to appeal)
  • Bennett v. Bennett, 2023-TS-01385 (ordering compliance with MRAP 10(b)(4))

April 18, 2024

  • Roberson v. State, 2021-CT-01182-SCT (denying cert)
  • Michael P. v. Thomas, 2021-CT-01288-SCT (denying cert)
  • Bennett v. State, 2021-CA-01313-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Tubwell v. FV-1, Inc., 2021-CT-01345-SCT (granting pro se cert petition)
  • In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2024-AD-00001-SCT (directing the disbursement of $138,454.56 in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services)
  • Reeves v. Gary, 2024-EC-00406-SCT (granting motion to vacate response a response and the circuit court’s order in an election contest)

Hand Down Pages

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 2, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions yesterday. There was a wills and estates case that was more of an appellate procedure case, a real property contract for sale case, a direct criminal appeal, and a tort/statute of limitations case.

Brown v. Black, 2022-CA-00869-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Dismissing appeal of a chancellor’s decision awarding attorneys fees, holding that the 2021 order on attorney’s fees was final and appealable regardless of 2022 certification and that the appeal was therefore untimely.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Eaton v. Haney, 2022-CA-00656-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision requiring specific performance for sale of real property and awarding damages and attorneys fees, holding that there was a valid contract for the sale of the real property and that the fact dispute between the parties was for the chancellor to decide and that the award of attorney’s fees was within the chancellor’s discretion.
(9-1: Emfinger dissented)

Hand v. State, 2022-KA-00819-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of kidnapping and child exploitation, holding that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Pettis v. Northeast Mississippi Electric Power Association, 2022-CA-00688-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming dismissal of a negligence claim under the doctrine of res judicata and the IIED and loss of consortium claims on statute of limitations grounds, holding that the discovery rule did not apply and that any fraudulent concealment arguments were waived for failure to raise them in the trial court.
(7-1-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without written opinion, Barnes did not participate)

Other Orders

Brown v. State, 2022-KA-00446-COA (denying rehearing)

Russell v. State, 2022-KA-00447-COA (denying rehearing)

Snyder v. Estate of Cockrell, 2022-CA-00597 (denying rehearing)

Galvan v. State, 2022-KA-00655-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 28, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions today: one certificate of need matter and two direct criminal appeals. It was a big day, however, for “Other Orders” as the Supreme Court adopted revisions to the Uniform Chancery Rules, approved local rules for a circuit court district, and issued decisions in two bar disciplinary matters.

Wakefield v. State, 2021-CT-00187-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of accessory after the fact to car theft, kidnapping, and murder, holding that under the unit of prosecution test the State may charge multiple violations of section 97-1-5 for each felony committed.
(6-3: Kitchens concurred in part and dissented in part joined by King and Ishee)

Owen v. State, 2021-CT-00887-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of a business, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial based on the evidence presented.
(6-3: Griffis dissented, joined by Kitchens and King)

Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Flowood, LLC v. Mississippi Methodist Hospital and Rehabilitation Center, Inc., 2023-SA-00370-SCT (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Vacating the chancery court’s judgment that reversed MSDH’s decision in a certificate of need application matter approving two providers, holding that the chancery court erred in determining that MDHS failed to consider a contemporaneous CON application from another entity for the same category of services and that MDHS did not err in its decision that the contemporaneous CON application was not relevant or in denying to reopen the closed hearing on the contemporaneous CON application.
(7-2: Randolph concurred in part and dissented in part; Griffis dissented.)

Other Orders

In Re: Uniform Chancery Court Rules, 89-R-99006-SCT (adopting revisions to the Uniform Chancery Rules)

In Re: Local Rules, 89-R-99015-SCT (approving local rules for the Fifteenth Circuit Court District)

The Mississippi Bar v. Mayers, 2021-BD-00268-SCT (ordering a lawyer permanently disbarred)

Bennett v. The Mississippi Bar, 2023-BR-00410-SCT (denying motion for reinstatement to the practice of law)

Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation v. Holloway, 2023-IA-01256 (granting petition for interlocutory appeal and stay)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 26, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions on Tuesday. The case that stood out to me was Murphy v. William Carey University not because of the result but because of how the Court of Appeals discussed the Horton doctrine. The special concurrence pulled no punches.

Frazier v. State, 2022-KA-00896-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder with firearm enhancement, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction and did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the defendant to read proffered testimony from the first trial that ended with a mistrial on the first-degree murder charge.
(10-0)

Murphy v. William Carey University, 2022-CA-00379-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Reversing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in a med mal case based on lack of pre-suit notice and the statute of limitations, holding that the defendant waived those defenses by failing to pursue them while actively participating in litigation.
(7-2: Lawrence specially concurred joined by McDonald, Smith, and Emfinger, and joined in part by Wilson and Westbrooks; Greenlee dissented, joined by Carlton)

NOTE – I find the discussion of the Horton doctrine fascinating. The majority opinion and the special concurrence threw some shade at the development of the Horton doctrine and how it has been applied. The majority opinion included this statement and footnote:


The special concurrence upped the ante and sharply criticized the state of the Horton doctrine. I read the special concurrence (carrying four votes and two “in part” votes) as a challenge to the Mississippi Supreme Court to clean up the Horton doctrine:

The special concurrence concluded with this:

I am not sure this is the best “test case” for the Horton doctrine based on the facts, but I will be watching for a cert petition.

The City of Pascagoula, Mississippi v. Cumbest, 2022-CA-00745-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing on direct appeal and reversing on cross-appeal in a case over whether private property was “menace” under Miss. Code Ann. section 21-19-11, holding that the circuit court erred in reversing the city council’s determination that the property was a “menace” and finding no abuse of discretion in the circuit court’s denial of the property owner’s decision denying the owner’s motion to compel production of documents.
(5-4: Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without separate written opinion; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Wilson, Westbrooks, and McCarty; Lawrence did not participate)

NOTE – The concurrence took issue with the City making the “menace” determination based on the condition of the property before the hearing and not at the time of the hearing.

Other Orders

Friley v. State, 2021-KA-00791-COA (denying rehearing)

Smith v. Ford, 2022-CA-00255-COA (denying rehearing)

Burns v. BancorpSouth Bank, 2022-CA-00404-COA (denying rehearing)

Moore v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, 2022-CA-00555-COA (denying rehearing)

Edwards v. State, 2022-KA-00719-COA (recalling mandate and permitting pro se motion for rehearing to proceed)

Scales v. State, 2022-KA-00856-COA (denying rehearing)

Thompson v. Thompson, 2022-CA-01014-COA (dismissing motion for rehearing as untimely)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 19, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. There was a med mal case dismissed on statute of limitations grounds, an IIED verdict, an interpleader by a bank to determine the appropriate beneficiary-on-death of a CD, a zoning decision, a felony conviction, and a few PCR cases.

Jordan v. States, 2022-CP-00874-COA, consolidated with 2022-CP-00877-COA and 2023-CP-00072-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denials of three PCR motions, holding that all three motions were barred as subsequent PCR motions and that no exception to the bar was supported.
(10-0)

Jones v. State, 2022-KA-01117-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of child exploitation after the “underage female” the defendant attempted to meet up with turned out to be an undercover officer, holding that the entrapment jury instruction was properly rejected and that the convictions were not against he overwhelming weight of evidence.
(10-0)

Rogers v. NewSouth NeuroSpine LLC, 2022-CP-01036-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations and denying post-judgment motions, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion denying the pro se plaintiff’s Rule 60 motion and also denying the defendants’ motion for sanctions, damages, and fees.
(10-0)

Gray v. Johnson, 2023-CA-00339-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in an interpleader initiated by a bank over the proper “pay-on-death” beneficiary of a CD, holding that the designation was latently ambiguous but that extrinsic evidence supported the chancellor’s decision whcih was not an abuse of discretion and was not wrong or clearly erroneous.
(6-4-0: Wilson, McCarty, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Greenlee concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Jackson County, Mississippi, v. Marcellus, 2023-CA-00111-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision that had reversed the decision of the Board of Supervisors denying a request to reclassify property from residential to commercial, holding that the Board’s decision was not arbitrary and capricious that the owner had not proved a change in character and a public need by clear and convincing evidence.
(9-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Bain v. State, 2023-CP-00206-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing dismissal of PCR motion for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the petitioner did not need to obtain permission from the Supreme Court to file his petition.
(9-1-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Green v. State, 2023-CP-00448-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the motion was barred as successive and that none of the exceptions applied, and that they lacked merit.
(8-2-0: McCarty and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Weaver v. Ross, 2022-CA-00426-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming a judgment in favor of a car restorer against a man who initiated litigation by suing for alleged negligent restoration after a jury trial, holding that the trial court did not err in excluding medical records related to the owner’s blood pressure for lack of authentication and an invoice on allegedly comparative restoration, that the verdict on IIED was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the overwhelming weight of it, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees.
(6-4-0: McCarty specially concurred, joined by Greenlee, Westbrooks, McDonald, Lawrence, and Smith; Wilson concurred in part and in the result, joined by Lawrence, McCarty, and Emfinger and joined in part by Greenlee, Westbrooks, McDonald, and Smith.)

NOTE – McCarty’s special concurrence has precedential effect. You should read it for its discussion and clarification of the fact that claims for IIED cannot stem from the distress caused solely by litigation.

Wilson’s concurrence was one full vote short of precedential effect, but was joined in part by four additional judges. Wilson joined Parts I and II of the majority opinion, but parted ways over the analysis of the attorney’s fees issue. Wilson agreed the judgment should be affirmed because the challenge to the award of attorney’s fees was procedurally barred, but would have reversed if it was not barred.

PRACTICE POINT – Wilson’s concurrence contains a good reminder of the importance of reviewing the record on appeal for completeness. Don’t assume the circuit clerk included everything you designated.

Other Orders

DeJohnette v. State, 2022-KA-00249-COA (denying rehearing)

Gilmer v. State, 2022-KM-00257-COA (denying rehearing)

Hutson v. Hutson, 2022-CA-00569-COA (denying rehearing)

Daly v. Raines, 2022-CA-00600-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 14, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions last week. Three were appeals of criminal convictions and the fourth opinion was an interesting tort case discussing a party’s duties to an opposing party during voir dire.

Jackson v. State, 2023-KA-00273-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery and sentence to life imprisonment, holding that there was no error after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(9-0)

City of Picayune v. Landry Lewis Germany Architects, P.A., 2022-CA-00909-SCT (Civil – Torts – MTCA)
Reversing a judgment against the City based on a claim that the City failed to volunteer information about a juror during voir dire in a civil trial to which the City was a party, holding: “A party litigant has no duty to party opposite to personally intervene during a trial to prevent a fraud on the court by a potential juror.”
(9-0)

Exson v. State, 2022-KA-01089-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of a dwelling, grand larceny, and first degree arson, holding that the issue of whether the State proved its evidence of the value element of the larceny statute was procedurally barred for failure to raise it in a post-trial motion and that the issue of whether the jury instructions were proper was procedurally barred and that there was no plain error.
(9-0)

Marbley v. State, 2022-KA-01280-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated domestic violence, holding that there were no issues warranting appellate review after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(9-0)

Other Orders

In Re: Commission on Continuing Legal Education, 89-R-99011-SCT (denying petition of the Commission to amend Rule 3 of the Rules and Regulations for Mandatory Continuing Legal Education)

Ndicu v. Gacheri, 2022-CT-00416-SCT (denying cert)

Wheeler v. Mississippi Limestone Corp., 2022-CT-00534-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 12, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions yesterday with something for just about everyone. Read on to find yours.

Estate of Douglas v. Green, 2022-CA-00365-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming on direct appeal and cross appeal in an ongoing estate saga, holding that the argument that interest should have been awarded on the return of insurance proceeds was procedurally barred, the limited award of attorney’s fees was within the trial court’s discretion, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to order the return funds to a joint account, and the cross-appeal was procedurally barred because it did not provide any legal support.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Stewart v. Stewart, 2022-CA-01122-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision on the father’s motion to modify or terminate child support, holding that the father’s obligation to pay for college under the PSA extended past the children turning 21.
(10-0)

White v. White, 2022-CP-00823-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming in part and reversing in part a chancellor’s decision imposing a constructive trust and ordering the transfer of a parcel of property, reversing the chancery court’s order in limine restricting the defendant from proving affirmative defenses asserted in his answer to the initial complaint and vacating the final judgment imposing a constructive trust, while also affirming the chancery court’s determination that some of the defendant’s payments were voluntary but reversing the determination that all of the payments were voluntary.
(8-2-0: Carlton and Wilson concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Johnson v. State, 2022-KA-00920-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of possession of methamphetamine and one count of trafficking Vyvanse, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Rambo v. Kelly Natural Gas Pipelines, LLC, 2023-WC-00402-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s decision denying benefits, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the MWCC’s finding that the claimant was a traveling employee but that he was not in the course of his employment when he was returning to work after a personal, unauthorized mid-week trip home.
(6-4: Carlton dissented, joined by Lawrence, McCarty, and Smith)

Practice Point – This is a friendly reminder that “course and scope” is not the test for workers’ comp cases. The MWCA casts a wider compensability net than “course and scope.” Generally, compensation must be paid for injuries “arising out of and in the course of employment.” Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-7.

Bell v. State, 2023-CP-00631-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a petition for expungement, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion because the petitioner failed to present evidence any evidence that he had been rehabilitated.
(8-2-0: Lawrence and Smith concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Nettles v. Nettles, 2023-CA-00041-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision granting the husband’s motion for involuntary dismissal, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the wife did not prove that she was entitled to a divorce based on habitual cruel and inhuman treatment by a preponderance of the evidence.
(6-4: Carlton, Westbrooks, McDonald, and Lawrence dissented without seprate written opinion)

Loving v. MS Eye Care, P.A., 2023-CA-00566-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a premises liability case, holding that there was no evidence that the chair the plaintiff fell backwards on was defective or unreasonably dangerous.
(9-0: Wilson did not participate)

Blackwell v. Reed, 2022-CP-01037-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision denying the ex-husband’s ppetition to terminate or modify alimony, holding that the issues were procedurally barred for failure to cite legal authority or relevant parts of the record and that the appeal otherwise lacked merit.
(10-0)

Other Orders

Kirk v. Newton, 2021-CT-00683-COA (denying motion to amend judgment)

Havercome v. State, 2022-CA-00391-COA (denying rehearing)

Phillips v. MDOC, 2022-SA-00392-COA (denying rehearing)

Agee v. State, 2022-KA-00994-COA (denying pro se “request to proceed with petition for rehearing” and dismissing pro se “request to proceed with petition for post-conviction relief”)

Bumpous v. Tishomingo County School District, 2022-CA-01010-COA (denying rehearing)

Johnson v. State, 2022-CP-01186-COA (denying rehearing)

Lawson v. State, 2023-TS-01384-COA (dismissing appeal)

Gates v. State, 2024-TS-00074-COA (allowing appeal to proceed upon finding that show-cause response was well taken)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 7, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions last Thursday. There is an appeal of the dismissal of an MTCA claim on summary judgment, an appeal of a Medicaid reimbursement-rate decision, and an appeal by a victorious pro se party. The headliner, however, is the appeal of Willie Godbolt’s convictions for the infamous 2017 shooting of eight people in Lincoln County.

Federinko v. Forrest County, Mississippi, 2023-CA-00204-SCT (Civil – MTCA)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant, holding that the plaintiff failed to allege a tortious or negligent act with respect to the MTCA defendants’ decision not to conduct an autopsy or obtain postmortem blood and fluids.
(9-0)

Mississippi Division of Medicaid v. Women’s Pavilion of South Mississippi, PLLC, 2023-SA-00098-SCT (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision vacating Medicaid’s reimbursement-rate decision, holding that the administrative officer did not have to defer to Medicaid’s initial decision but was to make findings of fact and a determination of the issues presented.
(8-0: Beam did not participate)

Stratton v. McKey, 2023-CP-00451-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of the pro se plaintiff’s Rule 60 motion to vacate a judgment in his favor that awarded him possession of his classic truck and monetary damages.
(9-0)

Godbolt v. State, 2020-DP-00440-SCT (Criminal – Death Penalty – Direct Appeal)
Affirming conviction of four counts of capital murder, four counts of first-degree murder, two counts of kidnapping, one count of attempted murder, and one count of armed robbery garnering four death sentences, six life sentences, and two twenty-year terms, holding that the trial court did not err in (1) denying a motion to server; (2) transferring venue to a neighboring county (with a jury drawn from a distant county); (3) “limiting” voir dire where the process lasted four days and produced nearly 800-pages of transcript; (4) denying a motion to suppress statements made to media and law enforcement; (5) denying a motion to suppress evidence obtained from the defendant’s home, vehicle, cell phone, other electronic devices; (6) allowing the defendant’s wife to testify under Rule 601(b)(2); (7) admitting evidence of prior bad acts; (8) admitting 911 calls; (9) not ordering a psychiatric evaluation that the defendant opposed; (10) admitting Facebook messages over an authentication objection; (11) only allowing the defendant (who exercised his right not to testify) limited time for allocution during closing arguments; (12) denying motion to exclude victim impact evidence; and the Supreme Court also (13) deferred the ineffective assistance claim to the PCR phase; (14) held that there was no Brady violation regarding the destruction of the defendant’s phone after all data and information from the phone were given to the defendant; (15) that the defendant’s right to an impartial jury was not violated; (16) held that there was no evidence of prosecutorial misconduct; (17) that the “heinous, atrocious or cruel” aggravator was not unconstitutional; (18) that the death penalty was not unconstitutional; (19) that the death penalty was not disproportional; (20) and that there was no error, so the cumulative error argument was without merit.
(7-2: King dissented, joined by Kitchens)

NOTE– You should never treat my summaries as a substitute for reading cases that you intend to rely on. This is especially true in a case like this one. This is probably the longest summary I have posted, but I have only scratched the surface.

Other Orders

Love v. State, 2021-CT-01101-SCT (granting pro se cert petition)

Norwood v. Smith, 2021-IA-01404-SCT (dismissing interlocutory appeal)

Rehabilitation Centers, Inc. v. Williams, 2023-CT-00453-SCT (denying in part and dismissing in part petition for cert and reverse and stay of mandate or in the alternative petition for interlocutory appeal)

Hand Down Page