Category: Supreme Court

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 16, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down six opinions today. Like the Court of Appeals on Tuesday, the Supreme Court’s decisions were all unanimous but appellants batted .500 at the Supreme Court. Today’s decisions include a med mal expert case, a board of aldermen case, a municipal boundaries case, an “intimately connected doctrine” premises case, an alienation of affection case, and a mortmain laws case.

UMMC v. Kelly, 2022-IA-00034-SCT (Civil – Medical Malpractice)
Reversing denial of summary judgment to UMMC, holding that the trial court abused its discretion in finding the plaintiff’s expert physician was qualified in the areas of treating impact injuries and infections where the parties agreed the doctor was a licensed ER doctor but the plaintiff did not produce a CV.
(9-0)

City of Canton, Mississippi Board of Aldermen v. Slaughter, 2021-CA-01210-SCT (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s reversal of Board of Aldermen’s decision to remove two members of the Canton Municipal Utilities Commission, holding that the commissioners were deprived of procedural due process when the mayor vetoed the issuance of notice and opportunity to be heard and that veto was not overridden by the BOA.
(9-0)

City of Jackson v. City of Pearl, 2021-AN-01422-SCT (Civil – Municipal Boundaries & Annexation)
Affirming the circuit court’s voidance of the City of Jackson’s ordinance that would incorporate land around JAN, holding that Jackson failed to obtain consent of the Rankin County Board of Supervisors before passing the ordinance.
(9-0)

White v. Targa Downstream, LLC, 2022-CA-00020-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing summary judgment for a premises owner, holding that the intimately connected doctrine does not give immunity to a premises owner when there is a fact issue regarding whether the premises owner created a dangerous condition and whether the independent contractor had actual or constructive notice of the condition.
(9-0)

NOTE – Here is the Court’s Conclusion:

Davis v. Davis, 2020-CA-01304-SCT (Civil – Torts-Other)
Reversing jury award in an alienation of affection case, holding that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations and the plaintiff failed to request proper jury instructions on damages.
(7-2-0: Chamberlin specially concurred joined by Griffis)

NOTE – Chamberlin’s special concurrence called for the abolition of the tort of alienation of affection.

Mississippi Baptist Foundation v. Fitch, 2022-CA-00065-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to heirs, holding that MBF had a possessory interest over a mineral interest as trustee, that the trustor’s death triggered the 10-year portion of the mortmain laws, and MBF failed to protect its alleged rights during that period and could not assert the forty years later.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Gardner v. Jackson, 2020-CT-01313-SCT (cert denied)

McGillberry v. Ross, 2021-CT-01076-SCT (cert denied)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 9, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions today and not one is pedestrian. The first involves whether the loser in an insurance coverage dec action can come back after the mandate in the dec action and after being vindicated in the underlying liability action, to get relief under Rule 60(b) from the no-coverage judgment. In the next case, the Court weighs in on the Jackson mayor’s attempt to veto the city council’s inaction on the garbage collection contract. The third case is an appeal of an order of contempt and order denying recusal after the attorney failed to appear at trial after representing to the circuit court that he had Covid.

Scruggs v. Farmland Mut. Ins. Co., 2021-CA-00877-SCT (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a Rule 60(b) motion, holding that the mandate rule deprived the circuit court of jurisdiction to entertain a Rule 60(b) motion twenty years after the Supreme Court’s opinion and mandate.
(9-0)

CONTEXT – The facts make this ruling a bit more interesting than the holding suggests. Many years go, the plaintiffs (Scruggses) lost an insurance coverage dec action in state court 20 years ago. Coverage had been denied because the Scruggses were accused of committing intentional acts by Monsanto. The Scruggses then prevailed in Monsanto’s federal lawsuit against them. I’ll let the Supremes take it from here:

Lumumba v. City Council of Jackson, 2022-CA-00855-SCT (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the special chancellor’s summary judgment in favor of the city council in this episode of Jackson’s garbage-collection saga, holding that the mayor did not have legal authority to veto a non-action or negative vote of the city counsel the city council’s non-ratification of the garbage collection contract presented by the mayor.
(9-0)

NOTE – The Court also held that the trial court did not err in allowing the city council to admit exhibits (public records that had been produced to the mayor) at the MSJ hearing that were not yet filed in the record of that case and that the chancellor did not err in denying the mayor’s motion for additional findings because the mayor could not both object to the court’s consideration of the city council’s exhibits while also asking the court to consider the mayor’s extrinsic evidence.

In Re: Ali M. Shamsiddeen, 2021-CA-01217-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming order of contempt and order denying recusal, holding that the trial court did not err in finding defense counsel in contempt for failing to appear at a pretrial conference (in person or virtually, after being given that opportunity) or at the trial because defense counsel said he had COVID but only provided a vague medical excuse and quarantine order but refused to provide medical documentation of the diagnosis.
(7-2: Kitchens dissented, joined by King)

NOTE – Here is the email the attorney sent to the court on the eve of trial.

Other Orders

In Re: Local Rules, 89-R-99015-SCT (granting motion to amend Tenth Chancery Court District’s local rules)

Shannon v. Shannon, 2020-CT-00847-SCT (dismissing previously-granted cert sua sponte)

Simmons v. Jackson County, 2020-CT-01014-SCT (denying cert)

Young v. Freese & Goss PLLC, 2020-CT-01280-SCT (denying cert)

Boyd v. State, 2021-CT-00066-SCT (denying cert)

Turner & Associates P.L.L.C. v. Estate of Watkins, 2021-CT-00258-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 2, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one decision yesterday but also granted cert in an interesting MTCA case involving police-protection immunity that split the Court of Appeals.

State v. RW Development, LLC, 2021-CA-01134-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancery court’s judgment denying the City’s request for declaratory judgment declaring that it had the sole and exclusive authority to lease Public Trust Tidelands, holding that Mississippi statutory law grants the City the authority to lease the property to a developer for public use and to build a pier without “obtaining a redundant second grant of authority from the Secretary of State in the form of a lease.”
(6-3: King dissented, joined by Kitchens and Griffis.)

Other Orders

Curry v. State, 2018-M-01543 (granting application to file successive motion for PCR)

Towns v. Panola County Bd. of Supervisors, 2020-CT-01364-SCT (denying cert)

Wilson v. Lexington Manor Senior Care, LLC, 2021-CT-00072-SCT (denying cert)

Edwards v. State, 2021-CT-00261-SCT (denying cert)

Phillips v. City of Oxford, 2021-CT-00639-SCT (granting cert)

NOTE – This is an interesting cert grant in a police-protection immunity case that split the Court of Appeals 5-4 with the majority reversing the judgment in favor of the City. Here is my summary of the COA decision:

Phillips v. City of Oxford, 2021-CA-00639-COA (Civil – Personal Injury/MTCA)
Reversing the circuit court’s finding after a bench trial that the City was protected by police-protection immunity after an officer’s vehicle crossed an intersection against a red light and struck the plaintiff’s vehicle while the officer was responding to an emergency, holding that the facts of this case met the “exceptional circumstances” requirement for finding reckless disregard and that the officer acted with conscious indifference to the safety of the public and the certain parts of the police chief’s testimony were not credible.
( 5-4: Judge Lawrence dissented, joined by Judge Wilson, Judge Smith, and Judge Emfinger; Judge Greenlee did not participate.)

NOTE– The Court of Appeals declined the appellant’s invitation to adopt a “reckless disregard per se” rule and maintained the totality-of-the-circumstances analysis.

Jones v. State, 2021-CT-01088-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of February 23, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One is an interesting case involving a term of incarceration for civil contempt approaching five years. The other was taken up on cert to address the defendant being sentenced as a habitual offender.

McPhail v. McPhail, 2020-CA-00739-SCT (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s order denying the father’s motion to be released from incarceration for contempt stemming from nonpayment of child support, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying release because the father refused to complete a court-ordered psychological evaluation which was the only remaining condition of release to be satisfied.
(5-4: Griffis dissented, joined by Kitchens, King, and Ishee)

Note – The dissent took issue with a nearly five-year incarceration for civil contempt that showed no sign of letting up:

Manuel v. State, 2020-CT-00711-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of second-degree murder and aggravated assault but vacating sentence as a habitual offender and remanding for resentencing, holding that the trial court lacked sufficient evidence to sentence Manuel as a habitual offender and that the Court of Appeals erred when it allowed the State to supplement the record with copies of indictments for prior offenses.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Murry v. State, 2020-CT-01363-SCT (denying cert)

Simpson County School District v. Wigley, 2021-CT-00009-SCT (denying cert)

Simpson v. State, 2021-CT-00075-SCT (denying cert)

James v. Thompson, 2021-CA-00458-SCT (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of February 16, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion today, along with several orders including the suspension of a municipal court judge for abuse of power.

Garcia v. State, 2020-DR-01224-SCT (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that even under heightened scrutiny due in capital cases the plaintiff did not present a substantial showing that he was denied the right to effective assistance of counsel for not pursuing and presenting fetal alcohol syndrome disorder as a mitigating factor, for not presenting and explaining all mitigating evidence, or for not developing and presenting evidence that the defendant was under the substantial domination of another person.
(6-3-0: Kitchens concurred in part and in the result, joined by King and Ishee and joined in part by Coleman)

Other Orders

Cooper v. State, 2018-M-01124 (denying PCR motion)

Gilmer v. McRae, 2021-CA-00028-SCT (granting appellees’ motion for fees and costs)

Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Municipal Court Judge Carlos E. Moore, 2022-JP-00504-SCT (suspending respondent from office without pay for sixty days from his position as municipal judge for both Grenada and Clarksdale, ordering public reprimand in each county, and ordering a $1,500 fine)

Yates Services, LLC v. Hill, 2022-M-00879-SCT (denying petition for interlocutory appeal)

Hawkins v. State, 2022-M-01131 (denying application for leave to proceed in trial court, finding the application frivolous, and warning against future frivolous filings)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of February 9, 2023

On Thursday, the Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion, and I was approaching the confluence of a dispositive/Daubert motions deadline in one case and an expert designation deadline in another.

Heritage Hunter Knoll, LLC v. Lamar County, Mississippi, 2021-CA-01325-SCT (Civil – States Boards and Agencies)
Affirming in part and denying in part the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of a property owner’s appeal of the County Board’s decisions related to a waste ordinance, holding that the appeal of an amendment to the ordinance was time-barred because it was not appealed within the 10-day time limitation in section 11-51-75, but also holding that the appeal of the Board’s denial of a variance request was timely filed and remanding for a full hearing on that issue.
(9-0)

NOTE – The Supreme Court also held that the property owner did not engage in claim splitting when it filed a separate lawsuit in federal court while appealing the Board’s actions:

Other Orders

Wallace v. State, 2020-M-00979 (denying application for leave to file motion for PCR, finding the filing frivolous, and warning against future frivolous filings)

Crossgates United Methodist Church v. Ming, 2020-IA-01358-SCT (dismissing interlocutory appeals)

White v. White, 2021-CT-00333-SCT (denying cert)

Beasley v. State, 2021-CT-00653-SCT (denying cert)

Norwood v. State, 2021-CT-00802-SCT (denying cert)

Bland v. State, 2021-KA-00973-SCT (denying rehearing)

Patterson v. MDES, 2021-CT-01150-SCT (dismissing “notice of appeal” and cert petition)

In re: Debbie Travis Robertson, 2022-M-01032 (denying petition for disqualification of judge)

In re: William C. Spencer, Jr., 2022-M-01041 (denying petition for disqualification of judge)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of February 2, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One is a consolidated appeal resolving a “circuit split” where two state circuit courts reached opposite conclusions on the same legal issue involving UM coverage for accidents caused by MTCA-immune tortfeasors. (Come for the holding, stay for the strong words about the Fifth Circuit’s earlier Erie-guess on this issue.) The other opinion involves the rights of a successor in title to a reciprocal easement.

Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 2021-CA-00882-SCT consolidated with State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Cooper, 2021-IA-01006-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Resolving a “circuit split” by holding that under the UM statutes (as amended in 2009) the UM carrier was required to provide UM coverage to plaintiffs for damages sustained in collisions with entities afforded immunity under MTCA, reversing summary judgment in one case and affirming the denial of summary judgment in the other case.
(7-0: Chief Justice Randolph and Justice Beam did not participate.)

Practice Point – The Supreme Court specifically addressed the limited precedential value of this decisions:

Note – The Supreme Court would like us to remember that the Fifth Circuit’s Erie-guesses are not binding precedent in Mississippi. McGlothin is a Fifth Circuit opinion from 2019 that the Mississippi Supreme Court did not exactly agree with:

So what does the Mississippi Supreme Court do?

You can read that approach (that involves the doctrine of in pari materia) in the opinion.

TransMontaigne Operating Company, L.P. v. Loresco I, LLC, 2021-CA-00980-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s denial of the plaintiff’s request for declaratory and injunctive relief, holding that the express language of a reciprocal easement was specific and clear and allowed the successor in title to the easement to full use of the easement per its terms and did not limit the successor to the scope of actual use by the predecessor in title.
(7-2: Justice Griffis dissented, joined by Justice King.)

Other Orders

In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (granting motion to amend Miss. R. Civ. P. 45 – *An order amending Rule 45 was also on the hand down list last week. The link to the order on the hand down page last week is no longer active, but you can see a copy of the PDF that was handed down last week on my post from last week. I quickly compared the two and didn’t immediately see any differences except the date that the amendment will go into effect based on the date the orders were entered.)

In Re: Advisory Committee on Rules, 89-R-99016-SCT (appointing County Judge Carol Jones Russell of Forrest Countyas a member of the Supreme Court of Mississippi Advisory Committee on Rules on the nomination by the Mississippi Conference of County Court Judges)

Fannings v. State, 2015-M-01061 (denying petition for application for leave to proceed in the trial court, finding the petition frivolous, and warning against further frivolous filings)

Cook v. State, 2017-M-00455 (denying motion for PCR, finding the filing frivolous, and restricting the plaintiff from further filings in forma pauperis)

Moffett v. State, 2021-CT-00622-SCT (denying cert)

Billie v. State, 2022-M-00416 (denying petition for application for leave to proceed in the trial court, finding the petition frivolous, and warning against further frivolous filings)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 31, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions today. Two affirm felony convictions and one is a PCR dismissal. One of the criminal cases contains a robust Confrontation Clause discussion between the majority and the dissent.

Williams v. State, 2022-KA-00100-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction for armed robbery, holding that there was no reversible error in admitting testimony from a detective that was not objected to and that neither the failure to object to that or defense counsel’s cross-examination of the detective constituted ineffective assistance.
(7-3-0: Judge Wilson, Judge McCarty, and Judge Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

McConn v. State, 2021-CP-00431-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion asserting ineffective assistance, holding that the trial court did not err in summarily dismissing the motion that was supported only by the movant’s affidavit and an immaterial affidavit and was contradicted by the record.
(9-1-0: Judge Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Pitts v. State, 2021-KA-00740-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery of his minor daughter, holding that placing a screen between the child and the defendant during the child’s testimony did not violate the Confrontation Clause or the Due Process Clause where the defendant was able to observe the child via camera during the entirety of her testimony; the trial court did not err in excluding the testimony of the defendant’s expert witnesses where their disclosure was untimely or in allowing the testimony under the tender-years exception; and there was no cumulative error.
(6-1-2: Judge McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge Wilson dissented, joined by Judge Westbrooks and joined in part by Judge McDonald. Judge Emfinger did not participate.)

NOTE – The dissent argued that the use of the screen was a violation of the Confrontation Clause:

Other Orders

Burns v. State, 2021-KA-00310-COA (denying rehearing)

Wilson v. State, 2021-KA-00608-COA (denying rehearing)

Loblolly Properties, LLC v. Le Papillon Homeowner’s Association Inc., 2021-CA-00767-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 26, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down just one opinion today, but it was a significant decision in the PCR arena. Of great interest to civil practitioners, the Supreme Court also amended Rule 37 and Rule 45 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure. The amendments to Rule 45 should make life easier, especially for paralegals and the circuit clerks’ offices.

Howell v. State, 2020-CA-00868-SCT (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a motion for PCR, overruling Rowland and holding that the plaintiff could not overcome the statute of limitations bar by asserting a fundamental-rights exception and holding that the petition otherwise lacked merit.
(7-3: Justice Kitchens dissented, joined by Justice King and Justice Ishee)

NOTE – Here is the language overruling Rowland:

ANOTHER NOTE – When both the majority and dissent cite Newell v. State you know its a classic, Mississippi separation of powers throw-down.

In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT
Amending Rule 37 and Rule 45 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure. Both amendments will impact civil practice and need to be studied and accounted for once they take effect. The big news from my perspective is that the amended Rule 45 provides a mechanism for attorneys to issue subpoenas in their cases not unlike the federal court rule. See the text of the amended rule and comment below for the details.

Here is the En Banc Order with the amended Rule 37 attached:

700_6149651Download

Here is the same for Rule 45:

700_6151791Download

Other Orders

Butler v. State, 2020-CT-00806-SCT (dismissing cert that had previously been granted)

Nelson v. State, 2020-M-01417 (denying application for leave to proceed in the trial court, finding it frivolous, and restricting the petitioner from filing further PCR petitions in forma pauperis)

Camphor v. State, 2021-CT-00048-SCT (denying cert)

Fisher v. State, 2021-KA-00828-SCT (denying rehearing)

Anderson v. State, 2022-M-00582 (denying motion for PCR, finding it frivolous, and warning against future frivolous filings)

In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2023-AD-00001-SCT (directing the disbursement of $148,438.33 in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 19, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today and both are reversals. One is an appeal of a property tax valuation and the other is an appeal of a chancellor’s decision disqualifying an attorney under Rule 4.2 of the Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct due to the attorney’s prior representation of a partnership in a lawsuit involving one of the partners.

Mississippi Hub, LLC v. Baldwin, 2021-CA-00935-SCT (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Reversing summary judgment that found an appeal of a property tax valuation was untimely, holding that the appeal was timely and that there were genuine issues of material fact as to the value of the underground natural gas facility at issue.
(8-1-0: Chief Justice Randolph concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Pettis v. Simrall, 2021-IA-01253-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision disqualifying counsel under Rule 4.2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct because of an alleged conflict of interest, holding that no attorney-client relationship between an attorney and a partner in a general partnership can be implied from an attorney’s representation of the general partnership and that a chancellor may not preemptively disqualify an attorney for practices and proceedings that were not before the court.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Chism v. State, 2018-M-01436 (denying application for leave to file motion for PCR, finding that the filing was frivolous, and warning against future frivolous filings)

Parker v. Ross, 2020-CT-01055-SCT (granting cert)

Roberson v. State, 2022-CT-01208-SCT (denying cert)

Skinner v. State, 2021-CT-00080-SCT (denying cert)

Sel Business Services, LLC v. Lord, 2021-CT-00368-SCT (granting cert)

Terpening v. F.L. Crane & Sons, Inc., 2021-CT-00544-SCT (denying cert)

Longo v. City of Waveland, 2021-CA-00735-SCT (denying rehearing)

Lewis v. State, 2021-CT-00736-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down List