Civil Contempt – Mississippi Appeals Blog

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of June 4, 2026

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down six opinions today. There are two decisions involving sanctions and/or contempt rulings. There is also a noteworthy judicial estoppel decision. The others are an election contest, a felony conviction, and an MDOC decision.

Walker v. Taylor, 2025-EC-00658-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of sworn petitions for judicial review of a primary-election contest, holding that a new election was not warranted based on alleged voter disenfranchisement or equal protection violations.
(6-0: Griffis for the Court; Branning did not participate)

Favre v. MDHS, 2024-IA-00880-SCT (Civil – Other)
Vacating Rule 11 sanctions, holding that the sanctioned parties were entitled to due process including notice and an opportunity to respond.
(7-0: Coleman for the Court)

Gombako-Amos v. Amos, 2023-CT-01253-SCT (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancery court and the Court of Appeals on cert, holding that there was no clear and convincing evidence of willful and deliberate violation of a court order to support a finding of civil contempt, rendering judgment on attorneys’ fees, and remanding to determine issues related to reimbursement.
(6-1: Griffis for the Court; Randolph dissented)

Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2024-CT-00455-SCT (civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the Court of Appeals’ reversal of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing on judicial estoppel grounds on cert, holding that the Court of Appeals did not err by reviewing the judgment de novo instead of abuse of discretion and that the trial court erred by not applying Fifth Circuit precedent in its analysis of the second element (a court accepted a previous position) of judicial estoppel.
(5-2: Randolph for the Court; Coleman dissented, joined by Branning)

Practice Point – I view this as a must-cite decision for judicial estoppel going forward.

Winters v. State, 2024-KA-01105-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault and attempted armed robbery, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-0: Sullivan for the Court)

Hudson v. MDOC, 2025-CA -00645-SCT (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming MDOC’s decision to not award trusty time due to conviction for attempted murder, holding that MDOC did not violate section 47-5-138.1 and that the denial of trusty time did not increase her sentence.
(7-0: Randolph for the Court)

Other Orders

In Re: Local Rules, 89-R-99015-SCT (granting motion seeking approval of revision to Local Rules for Fifth Chancery Court District)
Rules for Court Reporters, 89-R-99021-SCT (reappointing Hon. David P. Sullivan, Candace O’Barr Jones, Kati Vogt, and Latanya Allen as members of the Board of Certified Court Reporters for two-year terms from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2028)
Brown v. State, 2017-DR-01373-SCT (denying rehearing)
Upchurch v. Lewis, 2023-CT-01296-SCT (granting cert)
Jack v. City of Meridian, 2023-CT-01339-SCT (dismissing cert petition as untimely)
McLaurin v. State, 2024-CT-00138-SCT (denying cert)
Jones v. Jones, 2024-CA-00690-SCT (denying rehearing)
UMMC v. Giddens, 2024-CT-00842-SCT (denying cert)
Favre v. MDHS, 2024-IA-00880-SCT (dismissing motion for permission to file exhibit under seal as moot)
Walker v. State, 2024-CT-01032-SCT (denying cert)
Bivins v. Ellisville State School, 2024-CT-01098-SCT (denying cert)
In Re: Jones, 2024-CA-01307-SCT (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of February 23, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One is an interesting case involving a term of incarceration for civil contempt approaching five years. The other was taken up on cert to address the defendant being sentenced as a habitual offender.

McPhail v. McPhail, 2020-CA-00739-SCT (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s order denying the father’s motion to be released from incarceration for contempt stemming from nonpayment of child support, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying release because the father refused to complete a court-ordered psychological evaluation which was the only remaining condition of release to be satisfied.
(5-4: Griffis dissented, joined by Kitchens, King, and Ishee)

Note – The dissent took issue with a nearly five-year incarceration for civil contempt that showed no sign of letting up:

Manuel v. State, 2020-CT-00711-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of second-degree murder and aggravated assault but vacating sentence as a habitual offender and remanding for resentencing, holding that the trial court lacked sufficient evidence to sentence Manuel as a habitual offender and that the Court of Appeals erred when it allowed the State to supplement the record with copies of indictments for prior offenses.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Murry v. State, 2020-CT-01363-SCT (denying cert)

Simpson County School District v. Wigley, 2021-CT-00009-SCT (denying cert)

Simpson v. State, 2021-CT-00075-SCT (denying cert)

James v. Thompson, 2021-CA-00458-SCT (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of September 22, 2022

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions today. Two are criminal cases dealing with issues that occurred during voir dire. In one, the issue was an inculpatory exclamation by the defendant. In the other, the issue was two jurors’ undisclosed connection the defendant. The third opinion is a journey through contempt law.

Scott v. State, 2021-KA-01015-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary, holding that the court did not abuse its discretion denying the defendant’s attorney’s request for a mistrial after the defendant exclaimed during voir dire that he was “guilty as hell.”
(9-0)

Note – This decision seems correct to me.

Watts v. State, 2021-KA-00873-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming denial of a JNOV after the defendant was convicted of conspiracy to commit armed robbery, attempted armed robbery, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and a denial, holding that although two jurors did not disclose that they were related to a man who was murdered by the defendant’s brother in 2006 the court did not commit clear error in determining after an evidentiary hearing that those jurors lacked substantial knowledge of their connection with the defendant during voir dire.
(9-0)

Seals v. Stanton, 2020-CA-00741-SCT (Civil – Domestic Relations)
This decision waded into a morass of contempt and affirmed the chancellor in part, reversed and remanded in part, and vacated in part. The Supreme Court affirmed the chancellor’s finding that two attorneys handling a divorce proceeding were in direct criminal contempt for missing a hearing, vacating the penalty for that because it exceeded statutory authority and remanded on that issue, and affirmed an award of attorney’s fees to the other side. The Supreme Court vacated judgment of direct criminal contempt against another attorney and remanded for proceedings on under the constructive criminal contempt standards. The Supreme Court held that the chancellor erred in finding these attorneys in direct criminal contempt for violating a court order and remanded for a determination of whether an indirect civil contempt proceeding should be commenced.
(6-3: Justice Kitchens dissented, joined by Justice King and Justice Coleman.)

Practice Point – Don’t miss hearings. Don’t violate orders. If you have further questions about what went wrong here or about the intricacies of direct criminal contempt, indirect/constructive criminal contempt, and civil contempt I refer refer you to the opinion and wish you the best.

Other Orders

Hamer v. State, 2019-CT-01633-SCT (denying cert)
Nowell v. Stewart, 2020-CT-00728-SCT (denying cert)
Johnson v. State, 2022-CT-01308-SCT (dismissing cert sua sponte)

Hand Down List