Tag: child support

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 4, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. There is a paternity/child support case, a custody/termination of parental rights case, an MTCA personal injury case, a contract case, a slip-and-fall summary judgment, and three direct criminal appeals.

Myles v. Lewis, 2022-CA-01192-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings in a paternity action, holding that the chancellor erred in computing monthly child support by failing to account for the father’s significant income increase and personal withdrawals, inaccuracies in his financial statement, and admitted commingling of personal and business expenses; holding that the chancellor did not err in not requiring the father to pay half of the child’s private school tuition, insurance premiums, and extracurricular fees; and holding that no party was entitled attorney’s fees.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in result without writing)

Lemay v. City of Biloxi, 2023-CA-00469-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the City in an MTCA case stemming from a collision with a police officer, holding that although the trial court incorrectly ruled that the plaintiff was precluded from recovery because she was allegedly speeding, the summary judgment should affirmed because the undisputed evidence showed the officer was engaged in police protection activity and that he did not act with reckless disregard.
(7-2-0: Carlton and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence did not participate)

Hattie T. v. Matthew R., 2022-CP-00926-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s final judgment terminating parental rights, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying the mother’s motion to dismiss and that the chancellor’s decision terminating parental rights was supported by clear and convincing evidence and was in the best interests of the children.
(10-0)

Collins v. State, 2022-KA-01184-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of kidnapping, armed robbery, armed carjacking, aggravated assault, conspiracy to commit kidnapping, and conspiracy to commit armed robbery, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of other acts and crimes coupled with a limiting instruction, in excluding evidence of the defendant’s assault in prison by two witnesses, or in refusing the defendant’s instructions on lesser included instruction.
(7-2-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Terry v. State, 2022-KA-01194-COA, consolidated with Thomas v. State, 2022-KA-01278-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of two defendants (Terry and Thomas) for first-degree murder and drive-by shooting, holding that though the trial court abused its discretion in admitting surveillance video the error was harmless, that Terry’s conviction was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting text messages because they were not hearsay.
(10-0)

Designer Custom Homes, LLC v. U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies, LLC, 2023-CA-00207-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s reversal of the county court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a breach of contract case, holding that the circuit court erred by reversing on an issue and argument that were not raised in the county court or briefed on appeal and erred by finding that there was evidence in the record that presented a genuine issue of material fact.
(10-0)

Practice Point – Don’t rehash your trial court pleadings on appeal:

If the appeal process is daunting or simply pulling you away from other work you would rather do, your friendly neighborhood appellate attorney would love to visit with you about it.

Anderson v. SW Gaming LLC, 2023-CA-00345-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment for the defendant in a slip-and-fall case, holding that there was no evidence that the defendant caused water on the floor in the bathroom or that the defendant had either actual or constructive knowledge that there was water on the floor.
(10-0)

Harrera v. State, 2022-KA-01167-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of kidnapping, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, that the kidnapping instruction did not constructively amend the indictment (an issue that was procedurally barred and without merit), and that the trial court did not err by giving the State’s accomplice liability instruction.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00419-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Minor v. State, 2022-KA-00990-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 21, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down a bounty of twelve opinions yesterday. I noticed a stray opinion from Thursday, May 9 so that is also summarized below. With a total of thirteen opinions, there is a lot of ground covered.

Martin v. State, 2023-KA-00044-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault and armed robbery after a trial in absentia, holding that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Tilley v. Gibbs, 2022-CA-01150-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment awarding physical custody of a child to the father, holding that the chancellor did not err in his Albright analysis and that substantial, credible evidence supported the custody determination.
(10-0)

Hamer v. State, 023-CP-00701-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of relief and dismissal of PCR motion without an evidentiary hearing, holding that the PCR motion lacked sufficient support to warrant a evidentiary hearing.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

McVay v. State, 2022-KA-00523-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of four counts of capital murder and one count of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error in admitting evidence of prior bad acts during cross-examination of the defendant and holding that the defendant’s trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective for failing to object.
(7-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Carlton did not participate)

Jackson v. State, 2022-KA-01143-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and burglary and sentence to life without eligibility for early release, probation, or parole, holding that the indictment was not fatally defective; that there was no plain error in denying a motion to suppress the defendant’s statements to law enforcement where the defendant made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of Miranda; that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s proposed insanity defense and imperfect self-defense instructions; and that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Wilson and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Practice Point – This is a handy citation to tuck away for one of those “I know its true by I can’t find a case that says so” situations:

Thompson v. State, 2023-CP-00218-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of the petitioner’s fourth and fifth PCR motions, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding them time-barred.
(10-0)

Smith v. West, 2023-CA-00297-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for failure to prosecute a personal injury case, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion after granting several continuances over nearly ten years since the action was commenced.
(10-0)

Signaigo v. Grinstead, 2022-CA-01212-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings in an adverse possession action, affirming the finding that the plaintiff could not prove the ownership element but reversing the finding that title was vested in the defendant as a matter of law because that issue was beyond the scope of the motion for summary judgment.
(8-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2022-CA-01175-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s findings in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in the equitable division of marital property, in determining the amount of child support, in determining the amount of alimony, or in denying the mother’s request for attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Carr v. State, 2022-KA-00491-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the State did not commit prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments such that the court was required to intervene on its own initiative.
(10-0)

Pickens v. State, 2022-KA-00822-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of meth while in possession of a firearm, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and independently reviewing the record that there were no errors warranting reversal.
(10-0)

Hearn v. State, 2023-CP-00275-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding the motion time-barred and that no statutory exceptions applied.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

From May 9, 2024

Daniels v. State, 2022-KA-00705-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after the the defendant was convicted of one count of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, three counts of aggravated assault, and one count of shooting into an occupied dwelling, holding that indictment’s error as to the count for murder was harmless so the conviction of the lesser-included offense of manslaughter was affirmed but holding that the indictment was legally insufficient as to aggravated assault counts and that the error was compounded by repetition in jury instructions and the State’s closing arguments.
4-1*-5: Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald, Lawrence and Smith (each of whom also joined the lead opinion); Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes, Carlton, Wilson, and McCarty.)

Other Orders

  • Arnold v. State, 2021-KA-01426-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Rutland v. Regions Bank, 2022-CA-00720-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Malone v. State, 2022-CP-00958-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Boyett v. Cain, 2022-CP-00978-COA (denying rehearing)
  • EEECHO Inc. v. Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, 2022-SA-01068-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Boyette v. State, 2022-CP-01239-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 12, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions yesterday with something for just about everyone. Read on to find yours.

Estate of Douglas v. Green, 2022-CA-00365-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming on direct appeal and cross appeal in an ongoing estate saga, holding that the argument that interest should have been awarded on the return of insurance proceeds was procedurally barred, the limited award of attorney’s fees was within the trial court’s discretion, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to order the return funds to a joint account, and the cross-appeal was procedurally barred because it did not provide any legal support.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Stewart v. Stewart, 2022-CA-01122-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision on the father’s motion to modify or terminate child support, holding that the father’s obligation to pay for college under the PSA extended past the children turning 21.
(10-0)

White v. White, 2022-CP-00823-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming in part and reversing in part a chancellor’s decision imposing a constructive trust and ordering the transfer of a parcel of property, reversing the chancery court’s order in limine restricting the defendant from proving affirmative defenses asserted in his answer to the initial complaint and vacating the final judgment imposing a constructive trust, while also affirming the chancery court’s determination that some of the defendant’s payments were voluntary but reversing the determination that all of the payments were voluntary.
(8-2-0: Carlton and Wilson concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Johnson v. State, 2022-KA-00920-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of possession of methamphetamine and one count of trafficking Vyvanse, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Rambo v. Kelly Natural Gas Pipelines, LLC, 2023-WC-00402-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s decision denying benefits, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the MWCC’s finding that the claimant was a traveling employee but that he was not in the course of his employment when he was returning to work after a personal, unauthorized mid-week trip home.
(6-4: Carlton dissented, joined by Lawrence, McCarty, and Smith)

Practice Point – This is a friendly reminder that “course and scope” is not the test for workers’ comp cases. The MWCA casts a wider compensability net than “course and scope.” Generally, compensation must be paid for injuries “arising out of and in the course of employment.” Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-7.

Bell v. State, 2023-CP-00631-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a petition for expungement, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion because the petitioner failed to present evidence any evidence that he had been rehabilitated.
(8-2-0: Lawrence and Smith concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Nettles v. Nettles, 2023-CA-00041-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision granting the husband’s motion for involuntary dismissal, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the wife did not prove that she was entitled to a divorce based on habitual cruel and inhuman treatment by a preponderance of the evidence.
(6-4: Carlton, Westbrooks, McDonald, and Lawrence dissented without seprate written opinion)

Loving v. MS Eye Care, P.A., 2023-CA-00566-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a premises liability case, holding that there was no evidence that the chair the plaintiff fell backwards on was defective or unreasonably dangerous.
(9-0: Wilson did not participate)

Blackwell v. Reed, 2022-CP-01037-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision denying the ex-husband’s ppetition to terminate or modify alimony, holding that the issues were procedurally barred for failure to cite legal authority or relevant parts of the record and that the appeal otherwise lacked merit.
(10-0)

Other Orders

Kirk v. Newton, 2021-CT-00683-COA (denying motion to amend judgment)

Havercome v. State, 2022-CA-00391-COA (denying rehearing)

Phillips v. MDOC, 2022-SA-00392-COA (denying rehearing)

Agee v. State, 2022-KA-00994-COA (denying pro se “request to proceed with petition for rehearing” and dismissing pro se “request to proceed with petition for post-conviction relief”)

Bumpous v. Tishomingo County School District, 2022-CA-01010-COA (denying rehearing)

Johnson v. State, 2022-CP-01186-COA (denying rehearing)

Lawson v. State, 2023-TS-01384-COA (dismissing appeal)

Gates v. State, 2024-TS-00074-COA (allowing appeal to proceed upon finding that show-cause response was well taken)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 17, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions today. There is one divorce case, one direct criminal appeal, and one appeal of the dismissal of a negligence case for the plaintiff’s failure to comply with discovery and discovery-related orders from the circuit court.

Capocaccia v. Capocaccia, 2022-CA-00129-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s findings on equitable distribution, child support, and college expenses but affirming finding that the father was in contempt, holding that the chancellor erred in the division of the marital estate without referencing or discussion the parties’ debts and assets, erred in awarding child support in excess of the statutory guidelines without specific findings supporting the deviation, and erred in assigning equal responsibility for the children’s college expenses; but that there was no reversible error in denying the father’s motion to continue contempt proceedings or in finding the father in contempt.
(8-2-0: Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Russell v. State, 2022-KA-00447-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding there was no error in allowing a State’s witness to narrate events depicted in a surveillance video while it was played to the jury.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

McAlpin v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, 2022-CA-00334-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision granting a motion to dismiss in a negligence suit based on the plaintiff’s failure to heed court-ordered discovery requirements, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the plaintiff’s motion for additional time to comply with the scheduling order that was filed after the court had advised there would be no more extensions and on the date that the court had ordered that additional discovery responses were due and that the trial court did not err in dismissing the case with prejudice for repeated failures to comply with the court’s orders.
(10-0)

PRACTICE POINT – Here is the Court’s analysis of the facts of this case under standard in Beck v. Sapet, 937 So. 2d 945 (Miss. 2006):

Other Orders

Grantham v. Grimm, 2021-CA-01314-COA (denying rehearing)

SDBT Archives LLC v. Penn-Star Insurance Company, 2022-CA-00099-COA (denying rehearing)

Williams v. State, 2022-KA-00100-COA (denying rehearing)

Hamilton v. State, 2022-CP-00217-COA (denying rehearing)

Sanders v. Reeves, 2022-CP-01059-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 2, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeal handed down eight opinions today. There are five direct criminal appeals, two interesting workers’ comp cases, and a contempt proceeding in a divorce case.

Ehrhardt v. State, 2021-KA-01143-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of child exploitation, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress items found during the execution of a search warrant of the defendant’s home based on staleness and reliability or in denying a motion for mistrial after a State’s witness testified about the lack of a defense expert and gave curative direction and an instruction to the jury, and holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the overwhelming evidence of it.
(10-0)

Hawthorne v. Mississippi State Hospital, 2022-WC-00040-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming on direct appeal and cross-appeal, holding that the Commission’s finding that the claimant sustained a 40% loss of industrial use of his left lower extremity was supported by substantial credible evidence and that the Commission was within its discretion to strike the IME doctor’s amended report and order the Employer/Carrier to pay all costs of the doctor’s deposition after having ex parte contact with the doctor in violation of the IME order and did not err in denying a monetary sanction.
(10-0)

Amos v. State, 2022-KA-00171-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of statutory rape, holding that the admission of testimony of other was waived and/or harmless because the testimony was necessary to provide the jury with the complete story that led to the charges.
(10-0)

Liddell v. State, 2021-KA-00952-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for mistrial after the prosecutor made multiple public comments about the case to the media.
(10-0)

Wells v. State, 2022-KA-00157-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder and aggravated assault, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by limiting cross-examination of witnesses about whether someone else had a gun on the night in question, excluding evidence the defendant argued developed his theory of the case, or in denying a motion for mistrial on the grounds that one juror was confused through out the trial and hard of hearing.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Manley v. Manley, 2021-CA-00700-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s judgment in a contempt proceeding following a divorce, holding that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in awarding payment of back-owed portions of retirement pay and did not err in finding that the father was not entitled to a credit towards his child support obligations for in-kind contributions and thus awarding back-owed child support.
(7-1-2: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Carlton concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes.)

Parker v. Canton Manor and Mississippi Healthcare Association, 2022-WC-00206-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Reversing the MWCC’s decision dismissing the claimant’s two claims based on the two-year statute of limitations, holding that the “substantial evidence” standard did not apply because the Commission did not make any finds of fact based on evidence and that the Commission erred by granting a motion to dismiss because the allegations in the Petition on its face stated a claim and the Employer/Carrier presented no evidence to support its affirmative defense.
(8-2-0: Barnes and Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Practice Point – The Court of Appeals applied the Miss. R . Civ. P. 12(b)(6) standard to the Employer/Carrier’s motion to dismiss. Here is the crux of the opinion (from paragraph 11):

Applewhite v. State, 2022-KA-00290-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder and aggravated assault, both with firearm aggravation, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of it.
(8-2: Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald)

Other Orders

Lofton v. Lofton, 2021-CA-00035-COA (granting appellate attorney’s fees and costs)

Boutwell v. Fairchild, 2021-CA-01046-COA (denying rehearing)

Fox v. State, 2022-KA-00988-COA (denying motion for bail pending appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 28, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions today. Two are domestic relations cases: one dealing with child support and the other primarily dealing with custody. The third decisions is a PCR case.

Everett v. State, 2021-CP-01415-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary denial of a motion for PCR alleging an illegal sentence, holding no error because the sentence imposed was the maximum punishment authorized by statute at the time.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only; Smith did not participate)

If you would like to receive an email with my summaries when they are posted, enter your email address below and click “Subscribe” – You can always unsubscribe later.

White v. White, 2021-CA-01074-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision ordering past-due child support for the period of time from when the parties’ youngest child turned 18 until she turned 21, holding that there was no evidence presented that the child was emancipated before turning 21.
(10-0)

Latham v. Latham, 2022-CA-00363-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming chancellor’s divorce judgment, holding that the chancellor did not err in the application of the Albright factors or in finding that one party did not provide a financial disclosure to the court.
(9-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Other Orders

Tennesen v. City of Hattiesburg, 2021-CA-00137-COA (denying rehearing)

Wallace v. State, 2021-CP-01149-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 7, 2023

The ever-prolific Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There is a mix of criminal, domestic, and civil cases with a unifying theme of appellees running the table.

Edwards v. State, 2021-KM-01348-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Affirming conviction of first-offense DUI, holding that there was probable cause for the traffic stop and that law enforcement was not required to inform the defendant of his right to an independent and alternative BAC test.
(10-0)

Harrison v. Howard, 2021-CA-00697-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment of contempt for failure to comply with agreed order of modification of child custody and support, holding that the father waived improper service, that the agreed modification order was voidable but not void and he failed to timely appeal it, and that he waived the issue of termination of the mother’s child support obligation by not timely objecting or appealing.
(7-3-0: Wilson, McCarty, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Washington v. State, 2021-KA-01041-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder and armed robbery, holding that the trial court’s comments to the jury that this was not a death penalty case was appropriate clarification of fact and did not prejudice the jury, that the defendant did not prove that the State’s loss of a video lineup was not bad faith, that there was no proof that inadmissible portions of video testimony were played to the jury and so it is presumed that the trial court’s order sustaining an objection to the inadmissible testimony was heeded, and that if admitting a handgun into evidence was error it was invited by the defendant who introduced it.
(7-3-0: Wilson, McCarty, and Emfinger concur in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Pace v. State, 2022-KA-00046-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court erred in admitting photos without a proper foundation but the error was harmless, that the defendant waived the argument that the State made an improper comment during closing by not objecting, and that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s self-defense instruction.
(7-2-0: Wilson and Greenlee concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion, Smith did not participate.)

Brandon v. State, 2021-KA-01239-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon upon receipt of a Lindsey brief and a review of the record finding no arguable issues for appeal.
(10-0)

Lofton v. Lofton, 2021-CA-00035-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming judgment in a fraudulent-transfer of real and personal property lawsuit that is tangential to a pending divorce action, holding that the chancery court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the UFTA supported a finding of fraud or in awarding the prevailing party attorney’s fees.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in the result only.)

NOTE – This is an interesting and fact-bound decision discussing the UFTA.

Mack v. State, 2021-CA-01060-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming denial of expungement, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the plaintiff’s conviction was related to his official duties as a police officer.
(10-0)

Clark v. Tippah County Dept. of Child Protection Services, 2021-CP-01209-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming judgment terminating parental rights, holding that the mother’s due process claims were procedurally barred and without merit and that the chancellor did not err in terminating parental rights.
(7-2-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Westbrooks concurred in the result only; Greenlee did not participate.)

West Jasper Consolidated School District v. Rogers, 2021-CA-00171-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming chancery court’s judgment that the school district breached 16th section lease terms regarding rent adjustments, holding that the chancery court had subject matter jurisdiction, applied the correct standard of review, did not err in finding no material breach by appellees, did not err in overturning the county board’s ruling, and did not err in denying attorney’s fees to the appellant.
(10-0)

Other Orders

La Casa I, LLC v. Gottfried, 2021-CA-00347-COA (denying rehearing)

Belmer v. State, 2021-CP-00398-COA (denying rehearing)

Davis v. State, 2021-KA-00593-COA (denying rehearing)

Howard Industries, Inc. v. Hayes, 2021-WC-00694-COA (denying rehearing)

Meek v. Cheyenne Steel, Inc., 2021-WC-01219-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 1, 2022

The Mississippi Court of Appeals kicked off November with eight opinions. There are two domestic cases dealing with custody and divorce, a personal injury case adjacent to a workers’ comp claim with a statute of limitation issue, two reversals in administrative cases (MDES and MDHS), two PCR cases, and one criminal case.

Jarvis v. State, 2021-CP-00930-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the plaintiff’s guilty plea waived his defective-indictment claim based on alleged insufficiency in the State’s evidence and that his ineffective assistance claim lacked merit.
(9-1-0: Judge Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Blagodirova v. Schrock, 2020-CA-01162-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming in part and reversing in part a chancellor’s child-custody modification order, holding that the chancery court manifestly erred by finding an adverse effect on the child, did not err in denying attorney’s fees, and did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to compel completion of a financial disclosure statement.
(4-2-4: Judge Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge McCarty concurred in the result only without separate written opinion; Judge Carlton concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Chief Judge Barnes, Judge Greenlee, and Judge Smith.)

Baughman v. Baughman, 2021-CA-00074-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part on an appeal and cross-appeal from a divorce proceeding, affirming denial of the ex-husband’s claim for separate maintenance, affirming the denial of divorce on the grounds of adultery, and reversing the denial of divorce on the ground of habitual cruel and inhuman treatment.
(5-4-0: Judge Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge Wilson, Judge Greenlee, and Judge Lawrence concurred in the result only without separate written opinion; and Judge Carlton did not participate.)

Keys v. Rehabilitation, Inc., 2021-CA-01338-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal of certain claims as barred by the statute of limitations, holding that the plaintiff’s claims against a third-party (not the Employer, Carrier, or TPA) arising from the utilization review process in the course of his treatment for a workers’ comp injury were barred by the three-year statute of limitations.
(9-0: Judge Emfinger did not participate.)

NOTE – A critical aspect of this decision was that the lawsuit did not arise from the denial of workers’ comp benefits:

Bowman v. State, 2020-KA-01371-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder and tampering with evidence, holding that the trial court did not err in allowing the state medical examiner to testify about the cause and manner of death, in denying motions to suppress evidence seized at the defendant’s Mississippi property and in his vehicle in Utah, in denying a flight-evidence motion in limine and giving a flight-evidence jury instruction, or in refusing the defendant’s request for additional circumstantial evidence instructions, and that the convictions were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and were based on sufficient evidence.
(7-2-0: Judge McCarty and Judge Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge Smith did not participate.)

MDHS v. Reaves, 2021-SA-01133-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Reversing the chancery court’s order directing MDHS to reimburse the plaintiff for past child-support payments, holding that reimbursement was improper because a noncustodial parent cannot recover the child-support payments he made on behalf of his child.
(7-3: Judge McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge Wilson and Judge Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Wallace v. State, 2021-CP-01149-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of the plaintiff’s second PCR petition, holding that the court did not err when it was not persuaded that the guilty plea lacked a factual basis and was involuntary, that the indictment was defective, or that counsel was ineffective.
(9-1-0: Judge Wilson concurred in the result only without separate written opinion.)

Vector Transportation Co. v. MDES, 2021-CC-00576-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Reversing the circuit court’s judgment affirming the MDES Board of Review’s determination that an employee was entitled to unemployment benefits, holding that the employer met its burden of proof to show that the employee’s termination was for misconduct.
(6-3: Judge McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part; Judge Westbrooks dissented, joined by Judge Wilson and joined in part by Judge McDonald; Chief Judge Barnes did not participate.)

Other Orders

Simpson v. State, 2021-KA-00075-COA (denying rehearing)

Terpening v. F.L. Crane & Sons, Inc., 2021-CA-00544-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 18, 2022

We got five opinions today from the Mississippi Court of Appeals. There are two chancery cases, one dealing with termination of parental rights and another dealing with an appeal from a judgment of divorce, distribution, and child support. There is an appeal of a summary judgment in a slip and fall case, an unsuccessful appeal from a default judgment, and a criminal case challenging the admissibility of witness testimony.

Middlebrook v. Fuller, 2021-CA-00590-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s judgment adjudicating paternity and terminating parental rights, holding that there was clear and convincing evidence to terminate parental rights and that the chancellor did not err in making that determination contrary to the GAL’s recommendation.
(9-1: Judge Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without written opinion.)

Hill v. Central Sunbelt Federal Credit Union, 2021-CA-00833-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision granting summary judgment dismissing a slip and fall case, holding that rainwater on a porch did not constitute a dangerous condition where it was actively raining, surveillance video showed that water was not pudding or accumulating on the porch, and there was no evidence of other falls.
(7-1-1: Judge Westbrooks concurred in the result only without separate written opinion; Judge McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without separate written opinion; Judge Smith did not participate.)

La Casa I, LLC v. Gottfried, 2021-CA-00347-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to set aside entry of default, holding that the inadvertence by the defendant’s registered agent was not a legitimate explanation justifying the default and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the defendant had not presented a sufficient colorable defense.
(10-0)

Davis v. State, 2021-KA-00593-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm, holding that a witness’s testimony that she saw the defendant with a firearm weeks before the incident was properly admitted and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Green v. Green, 2021-CP-01167-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part on appeal from the chancery court’s judgment in a divorce case, holding that the appellant waived her right to challenge the merits of her divorce because she failed to appear at the hearing on the merits, that she waived that issue of distribution of marital assets by failing to cite legal authority to support her claims on appeal, but reversing and remanding for the chancellor to make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law consistent with Ferguson and to issue written findings concerning the reasonableness of the amount of child support.
(8-2: Judge McCarty concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Judge Greenlee -“If there is ever a case for waiver, this is it.”)

Other Orders

Roberson v. State, 2020-CA-01208-COA (denying rehearing)
Siggers v. State, 2021-CP-00985 (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 11, 2022

I did not post summaries last week because was out of town all week. I plan to do a post summarizing last week’s decisions at some point, but today is not that day because the Court of Appeals just handed down nine more opinions.

Today was a big day for Rule 4 and for workers’ comp, with two decisions for each of those subject areas. One of the workers’ comp decisions has a significant amount of analysis of the issue of whether the claimant overcame the presumption of no loss of wage-earning capacity. The other workers’ comp decision provides some clarity (and teeth) to the affirmative defense of intoxication. Additionally, we learned today that you should not white-out the defendant’s name on a summons after it is issued, write the name of the defendant to be served over the white-out, and then serve that altered summons on your defendant. There is also a divorce case dealing with child support, several criminal cases, and a lone PCR case.

Carnley v. State, 2021-KA-00438-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of rape, declining to reverse based on the exclusion of the victim’s prior inconsistent statement because no proffer was made and holding there was no error in the admission of expert testimony, that the defendant’s trial counsel was not ineffective, that the jury was properly instructed to continue its deliberation in lieu of a Sharplin instruction, and that the trial court did not commit cumulative error.
(9-1-0: Judge Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Wharton v. State, 2021-CA-00136-COA (Civil – Other/Civil Procedure)
Reversing a default judgment on a civil asset forfeiture petition, holding that the State failed to “strictly” comply with the Rule 4 requirements for service by publication, that the respondent did not waive the defense of insufficiency of service of process by failing to plead it in his answer because the answer was filed after the entry of default, and that the case should be remanded to give the State an opportunity to show good cause for failing to serve process before the statute of limitations expired.
(8-1-0: Judge Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion and Judge Emfinger did not participate.)

NOTE 1– There is a lot of civil and appellate procedure in this opinion (Miss. R. Civ. P. 4, 55; Miss. R. App. P. 2, 31). The appellate procedure ruling was interesting because the appellant missed his briefing deadline, but the Court of Appeals held that he should have been afforded 14 days to correct this “deficiency” and since he filed two days late he was within that window. This is interesting, but not a maneuver I plan to attempt.

Note 2 – I also want to point out this holding that although it is a fact-bound holding, these are facts one could find oneself bound up in.

Howard Industries v. Hayes, 2021-WC-00694-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC on direct appeal and cross appeal, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s award of sanctions against the Employer’s counsel for attempting to mislead the Commission, the Commission’s finding that the claimant had overcome the presumption of no loss of wage-earning capacity and awarding permanent disability benefits for her 2007 injury, and the Commission’s award of 38% industrial loss of use of her right upper extremity for her 2015 injury.
(5-4: Judge Wilson concurred in part and dissented in part (on the sanction issue), joined by Judge Greenlee, Judge McCarty, and Judge Smith. Judge Emfinger did not participate.)

Meek v. Cheyenne Steel, Inc., 2021-WC-01219-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s finding that the claimant was not entitled to benefits based upon the affirmative defense of intoxication, holding that the Employer’s payment of benefits did not estop the Employer from asserting the intoxication defense that was pleaded in the answer and that the very presence of marijuana in the claimant’s system raised the presumption of intoxication.
(10-0)

PRACTICE POINT – This case seems to answer a question that has lingered since the MWCA was amended to add the intoxication defense about what the effect of a positive drug test that does not give any indication of the degree of intoxication. In this case, the Court of Appeals decisively that any amount of intoxication triggers the presumption. A claimant can still seek to overcome that presumption, but based on the Meek decision a claimant cannot overcome the presumption by pointing to a lack of proof of the level of marijuana in the claimant’s system.

Ponder v. Ponder, 2020-CA-01196-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part in a divorce case, holding that the chancellor did not err or abuse his discretion in awarding child support retroactive to a date prior to the filing of the petition for modification but holding that there was no legal basis for an award of attorney’s fees against the father for failing to comply with an agreed order.
(9-1-0: Judge McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Villareal v. State, 2021-CP-00440-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of the plaintiff’s PCR motion, holding that the defendant’s sentence was not illegal.
(9-0: Judge Lawrence did not participate.)

Carruthers v. State, 2021-KA-00654-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of meth trafficking as subsequent offender in possession of a firearm near a church and possession of firearm by felon, holding that the defendant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel for alleged failures to object at various points in the trial or for alleged failure to investigate or for alleged failure to stipulate to a prior felony to keep evidence of the prior felony.
(7-2-0: Judge McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Judge McDonald concurred in the result only without separate written opinion.)

Arrington v. Anderson, 2021-CA-00233-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal of two identical negligence lawsuits, holding that a summons that was altered after issuance to change the name of the party to be summonsed to the defendant’s name and then served on the defendant was not valid service of process, that since process was not served the statute of limitations had expired the first lawsuit, and that the second lawsuit was not a “refiling” of the first since it was filed while the first suit was still pending.
(8-2-0: Judge Wilson and Judge McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion.)

Daniels v. State, 2021-KA-01067-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of armed robbery, two counts and aggravated assault, one count of house burglary, and one count of grand larceny, holding that the circuit court did not err in telling the jury panel that the defendant was charged as a habitual offender or in denying the defendant’s motion for a mistrial and holding that there was no abuse of discretion in admitting evidence about the defendant’s apprehension, arrest, and felony charges that immediately followed the activities for which he was convicted in this trial.
(8-2-0: Judge Wilson and Judge Emfinger concurred in the result without separate written opinion.)

Other Orders

Short v. State, 2021-KA-00499-COA (denying rehearing)
Daniels v. Family Dollar Stores of Mississippi, Inc., 2021-CA-00781-COA (denying rehearing)
Watkins v. State, 2021-CP-01301-COA (granting appellant’s pro se motion for leave to file an out-of-time brief)
Young v. State, 2022-CP-00141-COA (denying State’s motion to dismiss appeal)

Hand Down List