Tag: Felony

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of Late

Because of a string of litigation deadlines followed by a blessed week out of the office last week, I am behind on summaries. It has been a relatively slow month for hand downs in terms of volume from the Mississippi Supreme Court, so I am consolidating the last few weeks in this one post.

April 2, 2024 (a bonus Tuesday decision)

Barker v. Ivory, 2024-EC-00347-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision finding that a would-be candidate for Alderman was not qualified, holding that issues regarding the validity of the petition to object were procedurally barred and that the trial court’s decision that he failed to satisfy the two-year residency requirement was supported by sufficient evidence in the record.
(9-0)

April 4, 2024

State of Mississippi v. Aldrich, 2022-SA-01088-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancery court’s ruling in favor of a private landowner in a dispute over whether an acre of Mississippi coastal land was properly designated as State-owned tidelands, holding that the secretary of state had failed to following statutory guidelines in drafting the maps and failed to meet its burden of proof that the artificial filling was not the product of the deposition of oyster shells and dredge spoils.
(7-1-0: Kitchens concurred in part and in the result without writing; Randolph did not participate)

Archie v. State, 2022-KA-00326-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of conspiracy and capital murder, holding that the defendant was entitled to an instruction on his alibi theory of defense but that the trial court’s error refusing of that instruction was harmless error, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing the defendant’s proposed reasonable doubt instruction on the basis that it was cumulative, that the trial court did not err by admitting photos of the defendant that were authenticated by a witness other than the photographer, that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that the ineffective assistance of counsel claim was without merit.
(5-4: Coleman dissented, joined by Kitchens, King, and Ishee)

NOTE – The dissent asserted that Mississippi law required an alibi instruction and that the failure to give the alibi instruction could not be harmless error.

Hayes v. Thomas,  2023-EC-00229-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Reversing the circuit court’s grant of a default judgment a year after an election contest was filed questioning the vote count, holding that a default judgment was not permissible in this general election contest (per section 23-15-951) and that the petitioner’s failure to diligently prosecute her contest required dismissal with prejudice.
(9-0)

April 11, 2024

– No opinions (other orders are below)

April 18, 2024

Robinson v. State, 2023-KA-00184-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of heat-of-passion manslaughter, holding that whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a right-to-stand-your-ground jury instruction could not be analyzed on direct appeal based on direct appeal and holding that the State’s evidence was sufficient disprove the defendant’s self-defense claim.
(9-0)

Other Orders

April 4, 2024

  • Odom v. State, 2021-CT-00676-SCT (denying cert)
  • D.W. v. C.E., 2021-IA-01075-SCT (dismissing interloc as moot)
  • Hobby v. Ott, 2021-CT-01305-SCT (denying cert)
  • Pickle v. State, 2022-CT-00929-SCT (dismissing cert petition as untimely)

April 11, 2024

  • Smith v. State, 2020-CT-00774-SCT (denying cert)
  • Carpenter v. State, 2022-CT-00398-SCT (denying cert)
  • Hall v. State, 2022-CT-01097-SCT (denying cert)
  • Pryer v. State, 2023-M-01230-SCT (denying pro se petition to appeal)
  • Bennett v. Bennett, 2023-TS-01385 (ordering compliance with MRAP 10(b)(4))

April 18, 2024

  • Roberson v. State, 2021-CT-01182-SCT (denying cert)
  • Michael P. v. Thomas, 2021-CT-01288-SCT (denying cert)
  • Bennett v. State, 2021-CA-01313-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Tubwell v. FV-1, Inc., 2021-CT-01345-SCT (granting pro se cert petition)
  • In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2024-AD-00001-SCT (directing the disbursement of $138,454.56 in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services)
  • Reeves v. Gary, 2024-EC-00406-SCT (granting motion to vacate response a response and the circuit court’s order in an election contest)

Hand Down Pages

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 2, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions yesterday. There was a wills and estates case that was more of an appellate procedure case, a real property contract for sale case, a direct criminal appeal, and a tort/statute of limitations case.

Brown v. Black, 2022-CA-00869-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Dismissing appeal of a chancellor’s decision awarding attorneys fees, holding that the 2021 order on attorney’s fees was final and appealable regardless of 2022 certification and that the appeal was therefore untimely.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Eaton v. Haney, 2022-CA-00656-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision requiring specific performance for sale of real property and awarding damages and attorneys fees, holding that there was a valid contract for the sale of the real property and that the fact dispute between the parties was for the chancellor to decide and that the award of attorney’s fees was within the chancellor’s discretion.
(9-1: Emfinger dissented)

Hand v. State, 2022-KA-00819-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of kidnapping and child exploitation, holding that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Pettis v. Northeast Mississippi Electric Power Association, 2022-CA-00688-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming dismissal of a negligence claim under the doctrine of res judicata and the IIED and loss of consortium claims on statute of limitations grounds, holding that the discovery rule did not apply and that any fraudulent concealment arguments were waived for failure to raise them in the trial court.
(7-1-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without written opinion, Barnes did not participate)

Other Orders

Brown v. State, 2022-KA-00446-COA (denying rehearing)

Russell v. State, 2022-KA-00447-COA (denying rehearing)

Snyder v. Estate of Cockrell, 2022-CA-00597 (denying rehearing)

Galvan v. State, 2022-KA-00655-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 28, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions today: one certificate of need matter and two direct criminal appeals. It was a big day, however, for “Other Orders” as the Supreme Court adopted revisions to the Uniform Chancery Rules, approved local rules for a circuit court district, and issued decisions in two bar disciplinary matters.

Wakefield v. State, 2021-CT-00187-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of accessory after the fact to car theft, kidnapping, and murder, holding that under the unit of prosecution test the State may charge multiple violations of section 97-1-5 for each felony committed.
(6-3: Kitchens concurred in part and dissented in part joined by King and Ishee)

Owen v. State, 2021-CT-00887-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of a business, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial based on the evidence presented.
(6-3: Griffis dissented, joined by Kitchens and King)

Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Flowood, LLC v. Mississippi Methodist Hospital and Rehabilitation Center, Inc., 2023-SA-00370-SCT (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Vacating the chancery court’s judgment that reversed MSDH’s decision in a certificate of need application matter approving two providers, holding that the chancery court erred in determining that MDHS failed to consider a contemporaneous CON application from another entity for the same category of services and that MDHS did not err in its decision that the contemporaneous CON application was not relevant or in denying to reopen the closed hearing on the contemporaneous CON application.
(7-2: Randolph concurred in part and dissented in part; Griffis dissented.)

Other Orders

In Re: Uniform Chancery Court Rules, 89-R-99006-SCT (adopting revisions to the Uniform Chancery Rules)

In Re: Local Rules, 89-R-99015-SCT (approving local rules for the Fifteenth Circuit Court District)

The Mississippi Bar v. Mayers, 2021-BD-00268-SCT (ordering a lawyer permanently disbarred)

Bennett v. The Mississippi Bar, 2023-BR-00410-SCT (denying motion for reinstatement to the practice of law)

Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation v. Holloway, 2023-IA-01256 (granting petition for interlocutory appeal and stay)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 26, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions on Tuesday. The case that stood out to me was Murphy v. William Carey University not because of the result but because of how the Court of Appeals discussed the Horton doctrine. The special concurrence pulled no punches.

Frazier v. State, 2022-KA-00896-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder with firearm enhancement, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction and did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the defendant to read proffered testimony from the first trial that ended with a mistrial on the first-degree murder charge.
(10-0)

Murphy v. William Carey University, 2022-CA-00379-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Reversing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in a med mal case based on lack of pre-suit notice and the statute of limitations, holding that the defendant waived those defenses by failing to pursue them while actively participating in litigation.
(7-2: Lawrence specially concurred joined by McDonald, Smith, and Emfinger, and joined in part by Wilson and Westbrooks; Greenlee dissented, joined by Carlton)

NOTE – I find the discussion of the Horton doctrine fascinating. The majority opinion and the special concurrence threw some shade at the development of the Horton doctrine and how it has been applied. The majority opinion included this statement and footnote:


The special concurrence upped the ante and sharply criticized the state of the Horton doctrine. I read the special concurrence (carrying four votes and two “in part” votes) as a challenge to the Mississippi Supreme Court to clean up the Horton doctrine:

The special concurrence concluded with this:

I am not sure this is the best “test case” for the Horton doctrine based on the facts, but I will be watching for a cert petition.

The City of Pascagoula, Mississippi v. Cumbest, 2022-CA-00745-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing on direct appeal and reversing on cross-appeal in a case over whether private property was “menace” under Miss. Code Ann. section 21-19-11, holding that the circuit court erred in reversing the city council’s determination that the property was a “menace” and finding no abuse of discretion in the circuit court’s denial of the property owner’s decision denying the owner’s motion to compel production of documents.
(5-4: Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without separate written opinion; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Wilson, Westbrooks, and McCarty; Lawrence did not participate)

NOTE – The concurrence took issue with the City making the “menace” determination based on the condition of the property before the hearing and not at the time of the hearing.

Other Orders

Friley v. State, 2021-KA-00791-COA (denying rehearing)

Smith v. Ford, 2022-CA-00255-COA (denying rehearing)

Burns v. BancorpSouth Bank, 2022-CA-00404-COA (denying rehearing)

Moore v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, 2022-CA-00555-COA (denying rehearing)

Edwards v. State, 2022-KA-00719-COA (recalling mandate and permitting pro se motion for rehearing to proceed)

Scales v. State, 2022-KA-00856-COA (denying rehearing)

Thompson v. Thompson, 2022-CA-01014-COA (dismissing motion for rehearing as untimely)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 19, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. There was a med mal case dismissed on statute of limitations grounds, an IIED verdict, an interpleader by a bank to determine the appropriate beneficiary-on-death of a CD, a zoning decision, a felony conviction, and a few PCR cases.

Jordan v. States, 2022-CP-00874-COA, consolidated with 2022-CP-00877-COA and 2023-CP-00072-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denials of three PCR motions, holding that all three motions were barred as subsequent PCR motions and that no exception to the bar was supported.
(10-0)

Jones v. State, 2022-KA-01117-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of child exploitation after the “underage female” the defendant attempted to meet up with turned out to be an undercover officer, holding that the entrapment jury instruction was properly rejected and that the convictions were not against he overwhelming weight of evidence.
(10-0)

Rogers v. NewSouth NeuroSpine LLC, 2022-CP-01036-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations and denying post-judgment motions, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion denying the pro se plaintiff’s Rule 60 motion and also denying the defendants’ motion for sanctions, damages, and fees.
(10-0)

Gray v. Johnson, 2023-CA-00339-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in an interpleader initiated by a bank over the proper “pay-on-death” beneficiary of a CD, holding that the designation was latently ambiguous but that extrinsic evidence supported the chancellor’s decision whcih was not an abuse of discretion and was not wrong or clearly erroneous.
(6-4-0: Wilson, McCarty, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Greenlee concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Jackson County, Mississippi, v. Marcellus, 2023-CA-00111-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision that had reversed the decision of the Board of Supervisors denying a request to reclassify property from residential to commercial, holding that the Board’s decision was not arbitrary and capricious that the owner had not proved a change in character and a public need by clear and convincing evidence.
(9-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Bain v. State, 2023-CP-00206-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing dismissal of PCR motion for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the petitioner did not need to obtain permission from the Supreme Court to file his petition.
(9-1-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Green v. State, 2023-CP-00448-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the motion was barred as successive and that none of the exceptions applied, and that they lacked merit.
(8-2-0: McCarty and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Weaver v. Ross, 2022-CA-00426-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming a judgment in favor of a car restorer against a man who initiated litigation by suing for alleged negligent restoration after a jury trial, holding that the trial court did not err in excluding medical records related to the owner’s blood pressure for lack of authentication and an invoice on allegedly comparative restoration, that the verdict on IIED was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the overwhelming weight of it, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees.
(6-4-0: McCarty specially concurred, joined by Greenlee, Westbrooks, McDonald, Lawrence, and Smith; Wilson concurred in part and in the result, joined by Lawrence, McCarty, and Emfinger and joined in part by Greenlee, Westbrooks, McDonald, and Smith.)

NOTE – McCarty’s special concurrence has precedential effect. You should read it for its discussion and clarification of the fact that claims for IIED cannot stem from the distress caused solely by litigation.

Wilson’s concurrence was one full vote short of precedential effect, but was joined in part by four additional judges. Wilson joined Parts I and II of the majority opinion, but parted ways over the analysis of the attorney’s fees issue. Wilson agreed the judgment should be affirmed because the challenge to the award of attorney’s fees was procedurally barred, but would have reversed if it was not barred.

PRACTICE POINT – Wilson’s concurrence contains a good reminder of the importance of reviewing the record on appeal for completeness. Don’t assume the circuit clerk included everything you designated.

Other Orders

DeJohnette v. State, 2022-KA-00249-COA (denying rehearing)

Gilmer v. State, 2022-KM-00257-COA (denying rehearing)

Hutson v. Hutson, 2022-CA-00569-COA (denying rehearing)

Daly v. Raines, 2022-CA-00600-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 14, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions last week. Three were appeals of criminal convictions and the fourth opinion was an interesting tort case discussing a party’s duties to an opposing party during voir dire.

Jackson v. State, 2023-KA-00273-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery and sentence to life imprisonment, holding that there was no error after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(9-0)

City of Picayune v. Landry Lewis Germany Architects, P.A., 2022-CA-00909-SCT (Civil – Torts – MTCA)
Reversing a judgment against the City based on a claim that the City failed to volunteer information about a juror during voir dire in a civil trial to which the City was a party, holding: “A party litigant has no duty to party opposite to personally intervene during a trial to prevent a fraud on the court by a potential juror.”
(9-0)

Exson v. State, 2022-KA-01089-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of a dwelling, grand larceny, and first degree arson, holding that the issue of whether the State proved its evidence of the value element of the larceny statute was procedurally barred for failure to raise it in a post-trial motion and that the issue of whether the jury instructions were proper was procedurally barred and that there was no plain error.
(9-0)

Marbley v. State, 2022-KA-01280-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated domestic violence, holding that there were no issues warranting appellate review after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(9-0)

Other Orders

In Re: Commission on Continuing Legal Education, 89-R-99011-SCT (denying petition of the Commission to amend Rule 3 of the Rules and Regulations for Mandatory Continuing Legal Education)

Ndicu v. Gacheri, 2022-CT-00416-SCT (denying cert)

Wheeler v. Mississippi Limestone Corp., 2022-CT-00534-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 5, 2024

I’m back. Again. I would like to think I will go back and summarize the last few weeks that I have missed but that is probably water under the bridge at this point. Pressing forward, the Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. These decisions cover custody, felonies, personal injury, unemployment, and zoning. Notably, two criminal convictions were reversed.

Patrick v. Patrick, 2021-CA-00891-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s denial of the mother’s petition for contempt and modification and granting the father’s motion for modification, holding that the issue of custody was clearly before the chancellor who properly determined that there was a material change in circumstances that adversely affected the children, conducted a proper Albright analysis, and was within his discretion to order a change in legal and physical custody.
(8-1-1: McCarty concurred in part and in the result and McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part. Neither wrote.)

Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00419-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing convictions six counts of statutory rape, holding that the jury was not properly instructed as to the State’s burden of proof and remanding for a new trial.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing.)

Practice Point: The erroneous instruction was submitted by the defense, but the Court noted that the “invited-error doctrine” did not apply where the jury was not properly instructed on the elements of the crime. Here is the Court’s summary of the issues with the jury instructions:

Fletcher v. State, 2022-KA-00868-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder and sentence as habitual offender, holding that the trial court did not err when it failed to suppress the defendant’s statement to law enforcement officials.
(10-0)

The Avion Group, Inc. v. The City of Oxford, 2023-CA-00169-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision denying an ordinance variance to repair a wall/fence that enclosed the petitioner’s property, holding that the petitioner did not waive its challenge to the city’s code interpretation but that the circuit court’s interpretation of the code provisions at issue were not erroneous.
(10-0)

Carter v. C&S Canopy, Inc., 2022-CA-00730-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a driver and his employer in an auto-negligence case, holding that there was no evidence to support the plaintiff’s claim that the driver negligently continued to drive a “sluggish” truck on the interstate, that the defendants were negligent in their efforts to get the truck towed, that the location of reflective triangles was the proximate cause of the crash, that the defendant could have safely moved the disabled truck anywhere other than where he did, that the driver should have registered as a for-hire carrier, or that the employer negligently failed to train the driver.

Appellate Math Warning: None of us signed up for this.

Marshall v. State, 2022-KA-00541-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the circuit court erred in denying the defense’s peremptory strikes of three jurors, holding that the defense provided valid, race-neutral reasons for the strikes.
(10-0)

Cain v. M.D.E.S., 2023-CC-00188-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming denial of claim for unemployment benefits, holding that the circuit court properly dismissed the claimant’s appeal of denial as untimely.
(10-0)

Other Orders

Walker v. State, 2022-KA-00482-COA (denying rehearing)

Gregory Meridian Acquisition, LLC v. McFarland, 2022-CA-00580-COA (denying rehearing)

Fox v. Fox, 2022-CA-00918-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Double Issue: Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 6, 2024 and February 13, 2024

[Edited to correct the year in the title. I am behind, but I am not a whole year behind.]

I was about snowed under last week so I am trying to catch up here a bit. The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions on February 6 and another nine on February 13.

February 6, 2024

Porter v. State, 2023-CP-00091-COA (Civil – Other)
Vacating the trial court’s denial of a request to be reclassified as a non-habitual offender, holding that the petitioner was not a habitual offender but that his claims were filed in the wrong county so the case was remanded with instructions for the trial court to transfer to the appropriate county.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Gilmore v. State, 2023-CP-00527-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the motion was time-barred and not subject to any of the exceptions.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Ellis v. Turner-Johnson Dodge, Inc., 2022-CA-01126-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the county court’s order compelling arbitration, holding that there was a valid, binding arbitration agreement and that the dispute was within the scope of the agreement.
(7-2: Westbrooks and McDonald dissented; Smith did not participate)

Practice Point – Cite the record early and often in your briefs:

Moates v. State, 2022-KA-01062-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first degree murder, burglary of a dwelling under circumstances likely to terrorize, and simple domestic violence, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to sever the first-degree murder charge, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of prior bad acts, that the evidence was sufficient to support the simple domestic violence conviction, and that retroactive misjoinder argument was moot.
(10-0)

Practice Point – This is a good reminder that “prejudice” is not the test under Rule 403.

Other Orders

Gilbert v. State, 2021-KA-01265-COA (denying rehearing)

Kilcrease v. City of Tupelo, 2022-KM-00194-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

February 13, 2024

Williams v. Bryant, 2022-CA-00630-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a will contest, holding that the chancellor did not err in determining that there was a confidential relationship but that the evidence did not show abuse or suspicious circumstances or active involvement in procurement or execution of the will that would create a presumption of undue influence.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00935-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on the defendant’s alternative defense theory of heat-of-passion manslaughter.
(10-0)

Netherland v. State, 2022-CP-01236-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the petitioner’s Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights were not violated when law enforcement recorded the petitioner selling drugs to an informant and that there was no merit to the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.
(10-0)

Brooks v. State, 2022-KA-01016-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of a dwelling, simple assault domestic violence, and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the conviction for possession of a firearm was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Barnes and Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing)

EEECHO Inc. v. Mississippi Dept. Env’t Quality Permit Bd, 2022-SA-01068-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision affirming MDEQ’s Permit Board’s decision to issue water quality certifications, holding that the Permit Board did not err by not making factual findings regarding the possible storage of explosive ammunition, that the Permit Board’s failure to issue a revise public notice was not arbitrary or capricious, that the Permit Board’s decision that the subject property was preferable to the alternative project sites, and that the Permit Board’s failure to conduct an environmental justice review.
(8-2: McDonald dissented, joined by Westbrooks; Westbrooks dissented without writing)

Smith v. Smith, 2022-CA-00183-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancery court’s child custody and division or martial estate decisions, holding that the chancellor did not err or abuse his discretion in awarding custody to the father or in his visitation ruling, but that the chancellor erred by classifying one of the father’s businesses as separate property.
(10-0)

Wade v. State, 2022-CA-00370-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court’s decision that the plea was voluntary and intelligent notwithstanding the petitioner’s low intellectual ability, that there was no merit to the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, and that Miller did not apply because the felony convictions did not mandate life imprisonment.
(6-4-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Carlton, Westbrooks, and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Hunter v. State, 2022-CP-01269-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying the motion as untimely.
(10-0)

Clarksdale Pub. Utilities Comm’ v. Miss. Dept. of Emp’t Sec., 2022-CC-01085-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision affirming MDES Review Board’s decision approving unemployment benefits, holding that MDES was not collaterally estopped from making the benefits decision as a result of MDEC and CPOC having different standards and definitions of misconduct, that the ALJ did not err in refusing the admit 900 pages of exhibits that the employer offered for lack of foundation, and that there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the ALJ’s findings.
(3-2-3: Westbrooks and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in the result only without writing; Greenlee concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Carlton concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Greenlee and Lawrence; Barnesn did not participate)

Other Orders

Bradshaw v. Bradshaw, 2017-CT-01731-COA (granting motion to seal file on appeal)

Odom v. State, 2021-KA-00676-COA (denying rehearing)

Harrison v. Harrison, 2022-CA-00274-COA (denying rehearing)

Litton v. Litton, 2022-CA-00712-COA (denying rehearing)

Johnson v. Drake, 2022-CA-00818-COA (denying rehearing)

Forrest v. State, 2022-KA-00844-COA (granting pro se letter motion to recall mandate)

Patel v. State, 2022-CA-00985-COA (denying rehearing)

Fox v. State, 2022-KA-00988-COA (granting motion to expedite mandate)

Harvey v. State, 2023-CT-00157-COA (recalling mandate sua sponte)

Clark v. State, 2023-TS-01116-COA (granting motion to proceed out of time)

Odom v. State, 2023-TS-01165-COA (granting public defender’s motion withdraw, to substitute counsel, and respond to order to show cause)

Winn Dixie Stores v. Little, 2023-WC-01177-COA (granting motion to dismiss appeal as interlocutory)

Holifiend v. State, 2023-TS-01320-COA (granting motion to proceed out of time)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 30, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions today and three of them are at least a partial reversal. The lone affirmance was in an MTCA wrongful-death case stemming from a drowning. A PCR decision was affirmed in part and reversed in part, a post-divorce property division decision was reversed, and a police officer’s conviction of culpable-negligence manslaughter was reversed.

Malone v. State, 2022-CA-00281-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming in part and remanding in part the circuit court’s ruling in a PCR matter, holding that the circuit court did not err in rejecting the newly discovered evidence claim but holding that the circuit court erred by not addressing the ineffective assistance of counsel claim with specific findings or conclusions related to that claim.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Stephens v. City of Gulfport, 2022-CA-01008-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the city on an MTCA case stemming from a drowning, holding that Mississippi law does not “impose a duty on governmental entities to protect or warn against alleged dangerous conditions on property adjacent to property owned or operated by that governmental entity and not caused by the governmental entity” and that, in any event, the MTCA’s open and obvious defense applied to the river and barred the claim.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Thompson v. Thompson, 2022-CA-01014-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s property division ruling, holding that the judgment was a final, appealable order and that the chancellor erred in failing to conduct a proper Ferguson analysis.
(10-0)

Fox v. State, 2022-KA-00988-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of a police officer for culpable-negligence manslaughter against, holding that “[b]ased on the credible evidence presented at trial, no evidence establishes that Fox acted in a grossly negligent manner or that the victim’s death from minor abrasions was reasonably foreseeable under the circumstances,” that the verdict was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence (though this holding was relegated to a footnote) and holding that the circuit court abused its discretion by failing to give an accident or misfortune jury instruction.
(5-1-4: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Emfinger dissented, joined by Westbrooks, McDonald, and McCarty)

Other Orders

None

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 23, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions on Tuesday. There is a workers’ comp case, a homeowner v. HOA dispute with a robust discussion of Robert’s Rules of Order, a personal injury appeal after an underwhelming verdict for the plaintiff with some significant discovery/evidentiary rulings, a tortious interference case stemming from a grocery wholesaler’s default on financial obligations, three direct criminal appeals, and a couple of PCR cases.

Kirby v. State, 2022-KA-00320-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and two counts of possession of a weapon by a felon, holding that the defendant failed to show that his trial counsel was ineffective, that the court did not abuse its discretion by limiting cross-examination of a rebuttal witness for the State, and that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence.
(10-0)

Harris v. State, 2022-KA-00647-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of touching a child for lustful purposes as an authority figure, holding that the circuit court did not commit reversible error by admitting a video recording of the defendant’s police interview after the detective had already testified about the interview, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and declining to address the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim on direct appeal.
(10-0)

Buena Vista Lakes Maintenance Ass’n, Inc. v. Jones, 2022-CA-01153-COA (Civil – HOA)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision in a homeowner v. HOA dispute over the interpretation of bylaws, holding that the bylaws were not ambiguous and that a two-thirds majority of eligible votes cast at the meeting was required as opposed to two-third majority of those eligible to vote and holding that the chancellor erred in finding that the HOA’s bad on rental properties was against public policy.
(10-0)

NOTE – Robert’s Rules of Order had a moment here.

Divinity v. Hinds Cty Sch. Dist., 2022-WC-01282-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s decision after a hearing on the merits, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that the claimant’s upper extremity complaints were not among the injuries she sustained in her work-related accident and that the Employer/Carrier was not required to pay for a spinal cord stimulator and certain prescriptions.
(9-0: Carlton did not participate)

NOTE – This was a pro se appeal and the procedural history was convoluted.

Boyett v. State, 2022-CP-01239-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a motion for PCR, holding that the motion was time-barred.
(10-0)

Duncan v. State, 2023-CP-00406-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion for PCR, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding the PCR motion moot because the petitioner had been released on parole.
(10-0)

Harris v. Ratcliff, 2022-CA-00596-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of the plaintiff’s motion for new trial or additur after the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in an amount significantly less than the plaintiff’s claimed medical expenses, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the defendant’s additional time to designate experts, in striking one of the plaintiff’s experts at trial after the expert began testifying based on notes that had not been disclosed (to the surprise of both sides), in denying the plaintiff’s request to substitute an expert for another expert who was in a coma where the plaintiff was prepared to use the expert’s video testimony at trial, or in excluding a DTI brain scan.
(7-2: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part; McCarty did not participate)

Edwards v. State, 2022-KA-00719-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted capital murder of a chancery court judge, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing testimony from two law enforcement officers regarding information they received during their investigation because it was offered for purposes other than to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Silver Dollar Sales, Inc. v. Battah, 2022-CA-00476-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict in favor of one defendant in a case stemming from a grocery wholesaler’s default on its debts to a financing company, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove that one defendant (another grocery wholesaler) committed tortious interference with business relations or that anything that defendant did proximately caused actual damages to the plaintiff.
(8-2: McDonald dissented, joined by Westbrooks)

Other Orders

In the Matter of the Guardianship of B.P.: Michael P. v. Patrick Thomas and Jennifer Thomas, 2021-CA-01288-COA (denying rehearing)

Tubwell v. FV-1, Inc., 2021-CP-01345-COA (denying rehearing)

Washington v. State, 2021-KA-01384-COA (denying rehearing)

Ramsey v. State, 2022-CP-00103-COA (denying rehearing)

Prophet v. State, 2022-CA-00933-COA (denying rehearing)

Hall v. State, 2022-CP-01097-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page