Tag: First Amendment

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of May 4, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions today. One involves where an employee of a police department was entitled to a probable cause hearing, another is a trusts decision on cert that turned on the validity of statute of limitations arguments made for the first time on appeal, and the third is an intentional tort/First Amendment case stemming from a case that was the subject of a popular podcast. The Supreme Court also granted cert in one case.

Wallace v. State, 2022-CA-00119-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision denying a probable cause hearing after a police department employee was charged with simple assault of a minor, holding that a law enforcement officer who is not certified under section 45-6-11(3)(a) is not entitled to a probable cause hearing under section 99-3-28(1)(a)(i) and that the defendant was not entitled to a probable cause hearing because he was not within the scope of section 45-6-3(c).
(9-0)

Parker v. Ross, 2020-CT-01055-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the Court of Appeals in a trusts case, holding (1) the trial court did not err by granting a motion to dismissed based on the three-year statute of limitations and that the Court of Appeals erred by reversing that decision based on the ten-year statute of limitations that was raised for the first time on appeal and (2) that the trial court did err in finding that the statute of limitations was not tolled due to disability, affirming the Court of Appeals’ reversal based on sufficiency of evidence of disability.
(8-0: Kitchens did not participate.)

Wagner v. Andreacchio, 2021-IA-01199-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Reversing the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, gross negligence, invasion of privacy, and civil conspiracy stemming from the defendant’s publication of portions of an investigative file related to the plaintiffs’ son’s death, holding that the defendant’s publication of public records is constitutionally-protected speech.
(8-1: Griffis dissented)

NOTE – This is the case stems from the death of Christian Andreacchio that was the subject of the first season of the Culpable podcast.

Other Orders

In Re: State Intervention Courts Advisory Committee, 89-R-99039-SCT (appointing or reappointing E. Gregory Snowden, Director of the Administrative Office of the Courts, as Chair of the State Intervention Courts Advisory Committee and the following as members through December 31, 2023: Judge Michael M. Taylor, Judge Winston L. Kidd, Judge Robert Helfrich, Judge Charles E. Webster, Judge Kathy King Jackson, Melody Madaris, Representative Angela Cockerham, Mark Smith, Judge Randi P. Mueller, and Nathan Blevins)

Dampier v. State, 2021-CT-00280-SCT (granting cert)

Scruggs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Company, 2021-CA-00877-SCT (denying rehearing)

Jarvis v. State, 2021-CT-00930-SCT (denying cert)

Wallace v. State, 2021-CT-01149-SCT (denying cert)

Keys v. Rehabilitation, Inc., 2021-CT-01338-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 10, 2022

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two interesting opinions today. One dealt the final blow in a lawsuit a former judge of the Mississippi Court of Appeals filed against a sitting US Congressman. The other is a case of first impression dealing with the federal Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.

James v. Thompson, 2021-CA-00458-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming dismissal of a lawsuit against a U.S. Congressman, holding Mississippi law does not provide relief for the plaintiff’s claims of tortious interference with the election and her job as a judge on the Mississippi Court of Appeals.
(4-0: Justice Kitchens, Justice King, Justice Coleman, and Justice Griffis did not participate)

NOTE – The plaintiff’s claim stemmed from a “sample ballot” distributed by Congressman Thompson:

Carr v. Mississippi Lottery Corporation, 2021-CA-01304-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming the trial court’s decisions in a case of first impression interpreting and applying the federal Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove that he lawfully registered and used five domain names that infringed on the Mississippi Lottery mark under the ACPA and that the trial court did not err in consolidating the hearing for preliminary injunction with a trial on the merits, by denying the plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint, or by denying the plaintiff’s motion to dissolve or modify the permanent injunction.
(9-0)

Other Orders

In Re: Advisory Committee on Rules, 89-R-99016-SCT (authorizing and directing the disbursement of $20,000.00 from the Court’s Judicial System Operation Fund to the Mississippi Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Rules for its necessary work through September 30, 2023)

Manning v. State, 2020-CA-01096-SCT (denying rehearing)

Wall v. Wall, 2020-CT-01096-SCT (denying cert)

McGee v. Neel Schaffer Engineers and Planners Inc., 2020-CT-01277-SCT (denying cert)

Wofford v. State, 2020-CT-01341-SCT (denying cert)

James v. Thompson, 2021-CA-00458-SCT (denying motion for sanctions for frivolous appeal)

Unifund CCR Partners v. Estate of Jordan, 2021-CT-00761-SCT (denying cert)

Harris v. State, 2022-M-00417 (vacating sentence to serve a term of life without parole and remanding to the trial court for resentencing)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of June 16, 2022

The Mississippi Supreme Court took advantage of a slow inning from the Mississippi Court of Appeals and plated five opinions today to answer the COA’s two. These are big cases. There is an inverse condemnation decision, a legal malpractice decision stemming from a workers’ comp claim, a decision on whether Eight Amendment was violated by a life sentence without the possibility of parole for possession of marijuana by a habitual offender, and a case deciding whether Mississippi courts have subject-matter jurisdiction to hear claims stemming from the termination of a former employee of the Catholic Diocese of Jackson in light of the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine of the First Amendment.

City of Gulfport, Mississippi v. Cowan Road & Highway 90, LLC, 2020-CA-01286-SCT (Real Property)
Affirming on direct appeal and affirming in part/reversing in part on cross-appeal of an inverse condemnation ruling, holding that (1) the landowners were entitled to reasonable fees and costs because they fell within the purview of section 43-37-9, (2) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees or in reducing the attorney’s hourly rate, (3) the trial court did not abuse its discretion by not awarding prejudgement interest under section 75-17-7, and (4) the circuit court did abuse its discretion by not awarding post judgment interest.
(7-0: Chief Justice Randolph and Justice Beam did not participate.)

Lairy v. Chandler, 2019-CT-01423-SCT (Civil – Legal Malpractice)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals in a legal malpractice claim stemming from a workers’ compensation, holding that the trial court’s award for damages was sufficiently supported by the evidence and that while the plaintiff had to “pass the trial-within-a-trial test” she did not have to satisfy the “exacting statutory requirements” of the Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Act that would have applied to her workers’ compensation claim to pass that test.
(7-2: Justice Coleman dissented, joined by Justice King.)

Russell v. State, 2019-CT-01670-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming a life sentence without the possibility of parole for possession of marijuana as a habitual offender, holding that “the trial judge followed the letter of the law” and did not have sentencing discretion and that the defendant presented no evidence related to the Solem factors for an Eighth Amendment analysis.
(5-1-3: Chief Justice Randolph specially concurred with separate written opinion, joined by Justice Beam and Justice Ishee, but the Chief did not join the majority opinion. Justice Coleman dissented, joined by Justice Kitchens and Justice King.)

NOTE – This is a heavy case in terms of public policy, legal analysis, and outcome. The Court of Appeals below split 5-5. Judge Wilson wrote the main dissent, joined by Judge Westbrooks, Just McDonald, Judge Lawrence, and Judge McCarty. The grouping of judges and justices in majority and dissent is interesting as well.

Eubanks v. State, 2020-KM-00110-SCT (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Affirming conviction of simple assault domestic violence, holding that there was no violation of the defendant’s constitutional right to speedy trial or statutory right to speedy trial, that an objection to testimony was waived because it was not asserted at trial, that the defendant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel, that there was no error in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict, that the jury’s finding that the victim suffered bodily harm was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the State did not violate the defendant’s due process rights by failing to investigate and preserve exculpatory evidence, and that the trial court did not err by giving the State’s simple assault domestic violence jury instruction.
(5-4: Justice Coleman, with his white-hot dissenting pen, wrote a dissent that was joined by Justice Kitchens, Justice King, and Justice Ishee.)

Catholic Diocese of Jackson, Mississippi v. De Lange, 2021-IA-00159-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Reversing and rendering the circuit court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss claims stemming from the termination of the plaintiff, holding that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction under the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to hear the plaintiff’s claims of wrongful termination, defamation, and negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
(9-0)

NOTE – I watched the oral arguments in this case and found it fascinating. It was argued well by both sides, and the bench was thoughtful and fully engaged.

Other Order

Knox v. State, 2014-DR-00849-SCT (denying rehearing)

Hand Down List

My summaries are late because I spent much of the day lawyering in Smith County this morning.