Tag: jury instructions

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 4, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. There is a paternity/child support case, a custody/termination of parental rights case, an MTCA personal injury case, a contract case, a slip-and-fall summary judgment, and three direct criminal appeals.

Myles v. Lewis, 2022-CA-01192-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings in a paternity action, holding that the chancellor erred in computing monthly child support by failing to account for the father’s significant income increase and personal withdrawals, inaccuracies in his financial statement, and admitted commingling of personal and business expenses; holding that the chancellor did not err in not requiring the father to pay half of the child’s private school tuition, insurance premiums, and extracurricular fees; and holding that no party was entitled attorney’s fees.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in result without writing)

Lemay v. City of Biloxi, 2023-CA-00469-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the City in an MTCA case stemming from a collision with a police officer, holding that although the trial court incorrectly ruled that the plaintiff was precluded from recovery because she was allegedly speeding, the summary judgment should affirmed because the undisputed evidence showed the officer was engaged in police protection activity and that he did not act with reckless disregard.
(7-2-0: Carlton and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence did not participate)

Hattie T. v. Matthew R., 2022-CP-00926-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s final judgment terminating parental rights, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying the mother’s motion to dismiss and that the chancellor’s decision terminating parental rights was supported by clear and convincing evidence and was in the best interests of the children.
(10-0)

Collins v. State, 2022-KA-01184-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of kidnapping, armed robbery, armed carjacking, aggravated assault, conspiracy to commit kidnapping, and conspiracy to commit armed robbery, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of other acts and crimes coupled with a limiting instruction, in excluding evidence of the defendant’s assault in prison by two witnesses, or in refusing the defendant’s instructions on lesser included instruction.
(7-2-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Terry v. State, 2022-KA-01194-COA, consolidated with Thomas v. State, 2022-KA-01278-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of two defendants (Terry and Thomas) for first-degree murder and drive-by shooting, holding that though the trial court abused its discretion in admitting surveillance video the error was harmless, that Terry’s conviction was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting text messages because they were not hearsay.
(10-0)

Designer Custom Homes, LLC v. U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies, LLC, 2023-CA-00207-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s reversal of the county court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a breach of contract case, holding that the circuit court erred by reversing on an issue and argument that were not raised in the county court or briefed on appeal and erred by finding that there was evidence in the record that presented a genuine issue of material fact.
(10-0)

Practice Point – Don’t rehash your trial court pleadings on appeal:

If the appeal process is daunting or simply pulling you away from other work you would rather do, your friendly neighborhood appellate attorney would love to visit with you about it.

Anderson v. SW Gaming LLC, 2023-CA-00345-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment for the defendant in a slip-and-fall case, holding that there was no evidence that the defendant caused water on the floor in the bathroom or that the defendant had either actual or constructive knowledge that there was water on the floor.
(10-0)

Harrera v. State, 2022-KA-01167-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of kidnapping, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, that the kidnapping instruction did not constructively amend the indictment (an issue that was procedurally barred and without merit), and that the trial court did not err by giving the State’s accomplice liability instruction.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00419-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Minor v. State, 2022-KA-00990-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 28, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. All are criminal law or criminal law adjacent, however there is one case discussing the form of the jury’s verdict that is more broadly applicable.

McDonald v. State, 2022-KA-01073-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Wilson v. State, 2023-CA-00070-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion for PCR, holding that the motion was untimely and that the petitioner failed to establish an exception to the time bar.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Lathan v. State, 2022-KA-00927-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming a juvenile’s conviction of second-degree murder and 40-year sentence, holding that the court did not err by accepting a verdict form that did not conform to the instructions but that nonetheless conveyed the jury’s intent in a reasonably clear manner and did not err in sentencing the juvenile because neither Jones nor Miller applied.
(10-0)

NOTE – Here is the Court’s explanation of the verdict form:

The Court also noted that the defendant did not object and that the jury was polled and that all agreed with the verdict.

PRACTICE POINT – This decision is worth reading for its succinct discussion on the form of the verdict issue. It packs a lot into two pages and may come in handy for your next big verdict form dispute.

Haley v. Brewer, 2023-SA-00571-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of an inmate’s suit protesting a facility transfer, holding that the inmate had no protected liberty interest in his housing assignment within MDOC.
(10-0)

Spralls v. State, 2023-KA-00347-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of an automobile, holding that a review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and an independent review of the record that there was no reversible error.
(10-0)

Turnage v. State, 2023-KA-00432-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress because there was substantial evidence that the police had probable cause to search his vehicle under the plain view exception or in finding the automobile exception allowed for a complete search of his truck.
(8-2-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Hunter v. State, 2022-CP-01269-COA (dismissing untimely pro se motion for rehearing)
  • Gleason v. State, 2023-CP-00357-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Anderson v. Grabmiller, 2023-CA-00593-COA (dismissing appellee’s motion to strike appellant’s reply brief as moot after appellee’s notice of withdrawal and denying appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees and expenses)
  • Wilson v. State, 2023-CP-01050-COA (denying State’s motion to dsimiss and denying pro se appellant’s motion to preclude the State from filing a responsive brief)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 21, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down a bounty of twelve opinions yesterday. I noticed a stray opinion from Thursday, May 9 so that is also summarized below. With a total of thirteen opinions, there is a lot of ground covered.

Martin v. State, 2023-KA-00044-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault and armed robbery after a trial in absentia, holding that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Tilley v. Gibbs, 2022-CA-01150-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment awarding physical custody of a child to the father, holding that the chancellor did not err in his Albright analysis and that substantial, credible evidence supported the custody determination.
(10-0)

Hamer v. State, 023-CP-00701-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of relief and dismissal of PCR motion without an evidentiary hearing, holding that the PCR motion lacked sufficient support to warrant a evidentiary hearing.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

McVay v. State, 2022-KA-00523-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of four counts of capital murder and one count of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error in admitting evidence of prior bad acts during cross-examination of the defendant and holding that the defendant’s trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective for failing to object.
(7-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Carlton did not participate)

Jackson v. State, 2022-KA-01143-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and burglary and sentence to life without eligibility for early release, probation, or parole, holding that the indictment was not fatally defective; that there was no plain error in denying a motion to suppress the defendant’s statements to law enforcement where the defendant made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of Miranda; that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s proposed insanity defense and imperfect self-defense instructions; and that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Wilson and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Practice Point – This is a handy citation to tuck away for one of those “I know its true by I can’t find a case that says so” situations:

Thompson v. State, 2023-CP-00218-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of the petitioner’s fourth and fifth PCR motions, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding them time-barred.
(10-0)

Smith v. West, 2023-CA-00297-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for failure to prosecute a personal injury case, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion after granting several continuances over nearly ten years since the action was commenced.
(10-0)

Signaigo v. Grinstead, 2022-CA-01212-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings in an adverse possession action, affirming the finding that the plaintiff could not prove the ownership element but reversing the finding that title was vested in the defendant as a matter of law because that issue was beyond the scope of the motion for summary judgment.
(8-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2022-CA-01175-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s findings in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in the equitable division of marital property, in determining the amount of child support, in determining the amount of alimony, or in denying the mother’s request for attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Carr v. State, 2022-KA-00491-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the State did not commit prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments such that the court was required to intervene on its own initiative.
(10-0)

Pickens v. State, 2022-KA-00822-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of meth while in possession of a firearm, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and independently reviewing the record that there were no errors warranting reversal.
(10-0)

Hearn v. State, 2023-CP-00275-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding the motion time-barred and that no statutory exceptions applied.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

From May 9, 2024

Daniels v. State, 2022-KA-00705-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after the the defendant was convicted of one count of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, three counts of aggravated assault, and one count of shooting into an occupied dwelling, holding that indictment’s error as to the count for murder was harmless so the conviction of the lesser-included offense of manslaughter was affirmed but holding that the indictment was legally insufficient as to aggravated assault counts and that the error was compounded by repetition in jury instructions and the State’s closing arguments.
4-1*-5: Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald, Lawrence and Smith (each of whom also joined the lead opinion); Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes, Carlton, Wilson, and McCarty.)

Other Orders

  • Arnold v. State, 2021-KA-01426-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Rutland v. Regions Bank, 2022-CA-00720-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Malone v. State, 2022-CP-00958-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Boyett v. Cain, 2022-CP-00978-COA (denying rehearing)
  • EEECHO Inc. v. Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, 2022-SA-01068-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Boyette v. State, 2022-CP-01239-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of May 9, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions today. There is an decision about whether a subdivision’s roads are public or private, a Miller PCR case, a decisions about the applicability of McArn exceptions to at-will employment, and a felony case analyzing three jury instructions.

Newton County, Mississippi v. Deerfield Estates Subdivision Property Owners Association, LLC, 2022-CA-01227-SCT
(Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a case about whether the main roads in a subdivision are private or public roads, holding that the chancery court did not err in finding that the roads were accepted by the county via express common law dedication where the boards accepted the roads in its minutes, the rights of way over the roads, no tax had been levied on the rights of way, and the public had unrestricted access to the roads.
(9-0)

McDowell v. State, 2021-CT-01381-SCT (Civil – PCR)
Reversing sentence of life without parole after a resentencing trial pursuant to Miller, holding that the trial court’s unopposed grant of a jury trial under Miss Code. Ann. § 99-19-101(3) (Rev. 2020) made that section applicable to the entirety of the proceedings and therefore the trial court erred by conducting a Miller analysis and sentencing the defendant to life without parole.
(5-2-2: Maxwell concurred in part and in the result, joined by Randolph and Chamberlin; Beam dissented, joined by Griffis, and joined in part by Randolph and Maxwell.)

Brandi’s Hope Community Services, LLC v. Walters, 2022-CT-00188-SCT (Civil – Torts/Other)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the Court of Appeals and circuit court’s decisions after a wrongful termination verdict in the plaintiff’s favor, holding that the public policy exceptions to at-will employment established in McArn v. Allied Bruce-Terminix Co., Inc., do not conflict with the reporting protections in section 43-47-37(5)(b) of the Vulnerable Persons Act and that the plaintiff was qualified to bring wrongful termination claims.
(9-0)

Saxton v. State, 2023-KA-00226-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the trial court erred in granting an unopposed instruction that contained an “incomplete” statement of Mississippi’s self-defense law but that the error did not result in a miscarriage of justice in light of other instructions given, that the trial court did not in in granting a definitional instruction on “imminent danger,” and that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s self-defense instruction as repetitive.
(5-4: Maxwell specially concurred, joined by Kitchens, Coleman, and Chamberlin; Kitchens concurred in part and in the result, joined by King and Ishee, and joined in part by Coleman.)

Other Orders

  • Fortenberry v. State, 2017-M-01026 (granting application for leave to file PCR petition)
  • Walter v. State, 2021-M-01125 (denying an application for leave to proceed in the trial court, and finding the filing frivolous and warning that future frivolous filings could be met with sanctions)
  • Patel v. State, 2022-CT-00985-SCT (denying cert)
  • Harris v. State, 2022-KA-01195-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Kelly v. State, 2023-M-00482 (denying application for leave to file PCR petition)
  • Deutchman v. The Mississippi Bar, 2024-BD-00009-SCT (granting leave to resign in good standing from the practicing of law in Mississippi)

Hand Down Page

A couple of pictures from my trip to circuit court in Warren County yesterday:

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 30, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions on Tuesday. I had court in Union County that took me out of the office most of the day Tuesday. I then spent Wednesday making up for being out of the office on Tuesday, as one does. (Obligatory courthouse picture, infra.)

Taylor v. Johnson, 2022-CA-00734-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming grant of summary judgment in a car wreck negligence case, holding that there was no competent summary judgment evidence that the defendant proximately caused the collision, and then affirming summary judgment on the direct-negligence and punitive damages claims as moot.
(8-1-1: McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks dissented without writing)

Whiddon v. State, 2022-KA-00616-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, aggravated assault of a law enforcement officer, and fleeing a law enforcement officer, holding that the trial court did not err in denying motions to dismiss for lack of speedy trial, that the circuit court abused its discretion in excluding videotaped witness statements but that the error was harmless, that the court did not commit reversible error in commenting in front of the jury that a witness was “an excellent investigator,” that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-3-0: McDonald and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in the result only without writing)

Turner v. Turner, 2023-CA-00216-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing dismissal of complaint for divorce, holding that the chancellor erred by considering matters outside of the pleadings when ruling on a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) without converting it into a motion for summary judgment and providing necessary notice.
(10-0)

Suarez v. State, 2023-KA-00526-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of an occupied dwelling under circumstances likely to terrorize the occupant, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s lesser-included-offense jury instruction.
(7-3-0: Wilson, McDonald, and McCarty concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Harris v. State, 2023-CP-00227-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion following probation revocation, holding that the trial court’s failure to inquire about the petitioner’s ability to pay his fees and assessments was harmless error at most.
(10-0)

Crawford v. East Miss. State Hospital, Inc., 2022-CA-00753-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming judgment in favor of a hospital in a wrongful death lawsuit after bench trial, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the plaintiff did not prove the proximate cause element or in denying the plaintiff’s claim for the decedent’s “lifetime damages” because the estate was initially a party before being removed as a party via amendment to the complaint.
(6-2: McCarty concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks; McDonald and Smith did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Mississippi Dept. of Rehab. Servs v. Butler, 2022-CA-00176-COA (rehearing denied)
  • Harris v. Ratcliff, 2022-CA-00596-COA (rehearing denied)
  • Simmons v. State, 2022-KA-01260-COA (rehearing denied)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of Late

Because of a string of litigation deadlines followed by a blessed week out of the office last week, I am behind on summaries. It has been a relatively slow month for hand downs in terms of volume from the Mississippi Supreme Court, so I am consolidating the last few weeks in this one post.

April 2, 2024 (a bonus Tuesday decision)

Barker v. Ivory, 2024-EC-00347-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision finding that a would-be candidate for Alderman was not qualified, holding that issues regarding the validity of the petition to object were procedurally barred and that the trial court’s decision that he failed to satisfy the two-year residency requirement was supported by sufficient evidence in the record.
(9-0)

April 4, 2024

State of Mississippi v. Aldrich, 2022-SA-01088-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancery court’s ruling in favor of a private landowner in a dispute over whether an acre of Mississippi coastal land was properly designated as State-owned tidelands, holding that the secretary of state had failed to following statutory guidelines in drafting the maps and failed to meet its burden of proof that the artificial filling was not the product of the deposition of oyster shells and dredge spoils.
(7-1-0: Kitchens concurred in part and in the result without writing; Randolph did not participate)

Archie v. State, 2022-KA-00326-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of conspiracy and capital murder, holding that the defendant was entitled to an instruction on his alibi theory of defense but that the trial court’s error refusing of that instruction was harmless error, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing the defendant’s proposed reasonable doubt instruction on the basis that it was cumulative, that the trial court did not err by admitting photos of the defendant that were authenticated by a witness other than the photographer, that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that the ineffective assistance of counsel claim was without merit.
(5-4: Coleman dissented, joined by Kitchens, King, and Ishee)

NOTE – The dissent asserted that Mississippi law required an alibi instruction and that the failure to give the alibi instruction could not be harmless error.

Hayes v. Thomas,  2023-EC-00229-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Reversing the circuit court’s grant of a default judgment a year after an election contest was filed questioning the vote count, holding that a default judgment was not permissible in this general election contest (per section 23-15-951) and that the petitioner’s failure to diligently prosecute her contest required dismissal with prejudice.
(9-0)

April 11, 2024

– No opinions (other orders are below)

April 18, 2024

Robinson v. State, 2023-KA-00184-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of heat-of-passion manslaughter, holding that whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a right-to-stand-your-ground jury instruction could not be analyzed on direct appeal based on direct appeal and holding that the State’s evidence was sufficient disprove the defendant’s self-defense claim.
(9-0)

Other Orders

April 4, 2024

  • Odom v. State, 2021-CT-00676-SCT (denying cert)
  • D.W. v. C.E., 2021-IA-01075-SCT (dismissing interloc as moot)
  • Hobby v. Ott, 2021-CT-01305-SCT (denying cert)
  • Pickle v. State, 2022-CT-00929-SCT (dismissing cert petition as untimely)

April 11, 2024

  • Smith v. State, 2020-CT-00774-SCT (denying cert)
  • Carpenter v. State, 2022-CT-00398-SCT (denying cert)
  • Hall v. State, 2022-CT-01097-SCT (denying cert)
  • Pryer v. State, 2023-M-01230-SCT (denying pro se petition to appeal)
  • Bennett v. Bennett, 2023-TS-01385 (ordering compliance with MRAP 10(b)(4))

April 18, 2024

  • Roberson v. State, 2021-CT-01182-SCT (denying cert)
  • Michael P. v. Thomas, 2021-CT-01288-SCT (denying cert)
  • Bennett v. State, 2021-CA-01313-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Tubwell v. FV-1, Inc., 2021-CT-01345-SCT (granting pro se cert petition)
  • In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2024-AD-00001-SCT (directing the disbursement of $138,454.56 in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services)
  • Reeves v. Gary, 2024-EC-00406-SCT (granting motion to vacate response a response and the circuit court’s order in an election contest)

Hand Down Pages

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 26, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions on Tuesday. The case that stood out to me was Murphy v. William Carey University not because of the result but because of how the Court of Appeals discussed the Horton doctrine. The special concurrence pulled no punches.

Frazier v. State, 2022-KA-00896-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder with firearm enhancement, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying a heat-of-passion manslaughter instruction and did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the defendant to read proffered testimony from the first trial that ended with a mistrial on the first-degree murder charge.
(10-0)

Murphy v. William Carey University, 2022-CA-00379-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Reversing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in a med mal case based on lack of pre-suit notice and the statute of limitations, holding that the defendant waived those defenses by failing to pursue them while actively participating in litigation.
(7-2: Lawrence specially concurred joined by McDonald, Smith, and Emfinger, and joined in part by Wilson and Westbrooks; Greenlee dissented, joined by Carlton)

NOTE – I find the discussion of the Horton doctrine fascinating. The majority opinion and the special concurrence threw some shade at the development of the Horton doctrine and how it has been applied. The majority opinion included this statement and footnote:


The special concurrence upped the ante and sharply criticized the state of the Horton doctrine. I read the special concurrence (carrying four votes and two “in part” votes) as a challenge to the Mississippi Supreme Court to clean up the Horton doctrine:

The special concurrence concluded with this:

I am not sure this is the best “test case” for the Horton doctrine based on the facts, but I will be watching for a cert petition.

The City of Pascagoula, Mississippi v. Cumbest, 2022-CA-00745-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing on direct appeal and reversing on cross-appeal in a case over whether private property was “menace” under Miss. Code Ann. section 21-19-11, holding that the circuit court erred in reversing the city council’s determination that the property was a “menace” and finding no abuse of discretion in the circuit court’s denial of the property owner’s decision denying the owner’s motion to compel production of documents.
(5-4: Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part without separate written opinion; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Wilson, Westbrooks, and McCarty; Lawrence did not participate)

NOTE – The concurrence took issue with the City making the “menace” determination based on the condition of the property before the hearing and not at the time of the hearing.

Other Orders

Friley v. State, 2021-KA-00791-COA (denying rehearing)

Smith v. Ford, 2022-CA-00255-COA (denying rehearing)

Burns v. BancorpSouth Bank, 2022-CA-00404-COA (denying rehearing)

Moore v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, 2022-CA-00555-COA (denying rehearing)

Edwards v. State, 2022-KA-00719-COA (recalling mandate and permitting pro se motion for rehearing to proceed)

Scales v. State, 2022-KA-00856-COA (denying rehearing)

Thompson v. Thompson, 2022-CA-01014-COA (dismissing motion for rehearing as untimely)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 19, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. There was a med mal case dismissed on statute of limitations grounds, an IIED verdict, an interpleader by a bank to determine the appropriate beneficiary-on-death of a CD, a zoning decision, a felony conviction, and a few PCR cases.

Jordan v. States, 2022-CP-00874-COA, consolidated with 2022-CP-00877-COA and 2023-CP-00072-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denials of three PCR motions, holding that all three motions were barred as subsequent PCR motions and that no exception to the bar was supported.
(10-0)

Jones v. State, 2022-KA-01117-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of child exploitation after the “underage female” the defendant attempted to meet up with turned out to be an undercover officer, holding that the entrapment jury instruction was properly rejected and that the convictions were not against he overwhelming weight of evidence.
(10-0)

Rogers v. NewSouth NeuroSpine LLC, 2022-CP-01036-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations and denying post-judgment motions, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion denying the pro se plaintiff’s Rule 60 motion and also denying the defendants’ motion for sanctions, damages, and fees.
(10-0)

Gray v. Johnson, 2023-CA-00339-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in an interpleader initiated by a bank over the proper “pay-on-death” beneficiary of a CD, holding that the designation was latently ambiguous but that extrinsic evidence supported the chancellor’s decision whcih was not an abuse of discretion and was not wrong or clearly erroneous.
(6-4-0: Wilson, McCarty, and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Greenlee concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Jackson County, Mississippi, v. Marcellus, 2023-CA-00111-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision that had reversed the decision of the Board of Supervisors denying a request to reclassify property from residential to commercial, holding that the Board’s decision was not arbitrary and capricious that the owner had not proved a change in character and a public need by clear and convincing evidence.
(9-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Bain v. State, 2023-CP-00206-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing dismissal of PCR motion for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the petitioner did not need to obtain permission from the Supreme Court to file his petition.
(9-1-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Green v. State, 2023-CP-00448-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the motion was barred as successive and that none of the exceptions applied, and that they lacked merit.
(8-2-0: McCarty and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Weaver v. Ross, 2022-CA-00426-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming a judgment in favor of a car restorer against a man who initiated litigation by suing for alleged negligent restoration after a jury trial, holding that the trial court did not err in excluding medical records related to the owner’s blood pressure for lack of authentication and an invoice on allegedly comparative restoration, that the verdict on IIED was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the overwhelming weight of it, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees.
(6-4-0: McCarty specially concurred, joined by Greenlee, Westbrooks, McDonald, Lawrence, and Smith; Wilson concurred in part and in the result, joined by Lawrence, McCarty, and Emfinger and joined in part by Greenlee, Westbrooks, McDonald, and Smith.)

NOTE – McCarty’s special concurrence has precedential effect. You should read it for its discussion and clarification of the fact that claims for IIED cannot stem from the distress caused solely by litigation.

Wilson’s concurrence was one full vote short of precedential effect, but was joined in part by four additional judges. Wilson joined Parts I and II of the majority opinion, but parted ways over the analysis of the attorney’s fees issue. Wilson agreed the judgment should be affirmed because the challenge to the award of attorney’s fees was procedurally barred, but would have reversed if it was not barred.

PRACTICE POINT – Wilson’s concurrence contains a good reminder of the importance of reviewing the record on appeal for completeness. Don’t assume the circuit clerk included everything you designated.

Other Orders

DeJohnette v. State, 2022-KA-00249-COA (denying rehearing)

Gilmer v. State, 2022-KM-00257-COA (denying rehearing)

Hutson v. Hutson, 2022-CA-00569-COA (denying rehearing)

Daly v. Raines, 2022-CA-00600-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 5, 2024

I’m back. Again. I would like to think I will go back and summarize the last few weeks that I have missed but that is probably water under the bridge at this point. Pressing forward, the Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. These decisions cover custody, felonies, personal injury, unemployment, and zoning. Notably, two criminal convictions were reversed.

Patrick v. Patrick, 2021-CA-00891-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s denial of the mother’s petition for contempt and modification and granting the father’s motion for modification, holding that the issue of custody was clearly before the chancellor who properly determined that there was a material change in circumstances that adversely affected the children, conducted a proper Albright analysis, and was within his discretion to order a change in legal and physical custody.
(8-1-1: McCarty concurred in part and in the result and McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part. Neither wrote.)

Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00419-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing convictions six counts of statutory rape, holding that the jury was not properly instructed as to the State’s burden of proof and remanding for a new trial.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in result only without writing.)

Practice Point: The erroneous instruction was submitted by the defense, but the Court noted that the “invited-error doctrine” did not apply where the jury was not properly instructed on the elements of the crime. Here is the Court’s summary of the issues with the jury instructions:

Fletcher v. State, 2022-KA-00868-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder and sentence as habitual offender, holding that the trial court did not err when it failed to suppress the defendant’s statement to law enforcement officials.
(10-0)

The Avion Group, Inc. v. The City of Oxford, 2023-CA-00169-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision denying an ordinance variance to repair a wall/fence that enclosed the petitioner’s property, holding that the petitioner did not waive its challenge to the city’s code interpretation but that the circuit court’s interpretation of the code provisions at issue were not erroneous.
(10-0)

Carter v. C&S Canopy, Inc., 2022-CA-00730-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of a driver and his employer in an auto-negligence case, holding that there was no evidence to support the plaintiff’s claim that the driver negligently continued to drive a “sluggish” truck on the interstate, that the defendants were negligent in their efforts to get the truck towed, that the location of reflective triangles was the proximate cause of the crash, that the defendant could have safely moved the disabled truck anywhere other than where he did, that the driver should have registered as a for-hire carrier, or that the employer negligently failed to train the driver.

Appellate Math Warning: None of us signed up for this.

Marshall v. State, 2022-KA-00541-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the circuit court erred in denying the defense’s peremptory strikes of three jurors, holding that the defense provided valid, race-neutral reasons for the strikes.
(10-0)

Cain v. M.D.E.S., 2023-CC-00188-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming denial of claim for unemployment benefits, holding that the circuit court properly dismissed the claimant’s appeal of denial as untimely.
(10-0)

Other Orders

Walker v. State, 2022-KA-00482-COA (denying rehearing)

Gregory Meridian Acquisition, LLC v. McFarland, 2022-CA-00580-COA (denying rehearing)

Fox v. Fox, 2022-CA-00918-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Double Issue: Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of February 6, 2024 and February 13, 2024

[Edited to correct the year in the title. I am behind, but I am not a whole year behind.]

I was about snowed under last week so I am trying to catch up here a bit. The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions on February 6 and another nine on February 13.

February 6, 2024

Porter v. State, 2023-CP-00091-COA (Civil – Other)
Vacating the trial court’s denial of a request to be reclassified as a non-habitual offender, holding that the petitioner was not a habitual offender but that his claims were filed in the wrong county so the case was remanded with instructions for the trial court to transfer to the appropriate county.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Gilmore v. State, 2023-CP-00527-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the motion was time-barred and not subject to any of the exceptions.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Ellis v. Turner-Johnson Dodge, Inc., 2022-CA-01126-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the county court’s order compelling arbitration, holding that there was a valid, binding arbitration agreement and that the dispute was within the scope of the agreement.
(7-2: Westbrooks and McDonald dissented; Smith did not participate)

Practice Point – Cite the record early and often in your briefs:

Moates v. State, 2022-KA-01062-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first degree murder, burglary of a dwelling under circumstances likely to terrorize, and simple domestic violence, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to sever the first-degree murder charge, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of prior bad acts, that the evidence was sufficient to support the simple domestic violence conviction, and that retroactive misjoinder argument was moot.
(10-0)

Practice Point – This is a good reminder that “prejudice” is not the test under Rule 403.

Other Orders

Gilbert v. State, 2021-KA-01265-COA (denying rehearing)

Kilcrease v. City of Tupelo, 2022-KM-00194-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

February 13, 2024

Williams v. Bryant, 2022-CA-00630-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a will contest, holding that the chancellor did not err in determining that there was a confidential relationship but that the evidence did not show abuse or suspicious circumstances or active involvement in procurement or execution of the will that would create a presumption of undue influence.
(9-1-0: McDonald concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00935-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on the defendant’s alternative defense theory of heat-of-passion manslaughter.
(10-0)

Netherland v. State, 2022-CP-01236-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the petitioner’s Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights were not violated when law enforcement recorded the petitioner selling drugs to an informant and that there was no merit to the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.
(10-0)

Brooks v. State, 2022-KA-01016-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of a dwelling, simple assault domestic violence, and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the conviction for possession of a firearm was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Barnes and Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing)

EEECHO Inc. v. Mississippi Dept. Env’t Quality Permit Bd, 2022-SA-01068-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision affirming MDEQ’s Permit Board’s decision to issue water quality certifications, holding that the Permit Board did not err by not making factual findings regarding the possible storage of explosive ammunition, that the Permit Board’s failure to issue a revise public notice was not arbitrary or capricious, that the Permit Board’s decision that the subject property was preferable to the alternative project sites, and that the Permit Board’s failure to conduct an environmental justice review.
(8-2: McDonald dissented, joined by Westbrooks; Westbrooks dissented without writing)

Smith v. Smith, 2022-CA-00183-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancery court’s child custody and division or martial estate decisions, holding that the chancellor did not err or abuse his discretion in awarding custody to the father or in his visitation ruling, but that the chancellor erred by classifying one of the father’s businesses as separate property.
(10-0)

Wade v. State, 2022-CA-00370-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court’s decision that the plea was voluntary and intelligent notwithstanding the petitioner’s low intellectual ability, that there was no merit to the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, and that Miller did not apply because the felony convictions did not mandate life imprisonment.
(6-4-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Carlton, Westbrooks, and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Hunter v. State, 2022-CP-01269-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in denying the motion as untimely.
(10-0)

Clarksdale Pub. Utilities Comm’ v. Miss. Dept. of Emp’t Sec., 2022-CC-01085-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision affirming MDES Review Board’s decision approving unemployment benefits, holding that MDES was not collaterally estopped from making the benefits decision as a result of MDEC and CPOC having different standards and definitions of misconduct, that the ALJ did not err in refusing the admit 900 pages of exhibits that the employer offered for lack of foundation, and that there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the ALJ’s findings.
(3-2-3: Westbrooks and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in the result only without writing; Greenlee concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Carlton concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Greenlee and Lawrence; Barnesn did not participate)

Other Orders

Bradshaw v. Bradshaw, 2017-CT-01731-COA (granting motion to seal file on appeal)

Odom v. State, 2021-KA-00676-COA (denying rehearing)

Harrison v. Harrison, 2022-CA-00274-COA (denying rehearing)

Litton v. Litton, 2022-CA-00712-COA (denying rehearing)

Johnson v. Drake, 2022-CA-00818-COA (denying rehearing)

Forrest v. State, 2022-KA-00844-COA (granting pro se letter motion to recall mandate)

Patel v. State, 2022-CA-00985-COA (denying rehearing)

Fox v. State, 2022-KA-00988-COA (granting motion to expedite mandate)

Harvey v. State, 2023-CT-00157-COA (recalling mandate sua sponte)

Clark v. State, 2023-TS-01116-COA (granting motion to proceed out of time)

Odom v. State, 2023-TS-01165-COA (granting public defender’s motion withdraw, to substitute counsel, and respond to order to show cause)

Winn Dixie Stores v. Little, 2023-WC-01177-COA (granting motion to dismiss appeal as interlocutory)

Holifiend v. State, 2023-TS-01320-COA (granting motion to proceed out of time)

Hand Down Page