Tag: Lack of Prosecution

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 16, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. We got a couple of custody decisions, a couple of MTCA decisions, a failure to prosecute a med mal lawsuit, a felony, and a PCR case.

E.H. v. Lee County Dept. of Child Protective Services, 2023-CA-00732-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the youth court’s decision terminating parental rights, holding that the youth court’s decision was supported by substantial evidence and that the denial of a Rule 60 motion was not erroneous.
(10-0: St. Pe’ for the Court)

Cameron v. Miller, 2023-CA-01388-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision granting a motion to dismiss a med mal lawsuit for failure to prosecute, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion where the record demonstrated an overall case of dilatory conduct, substantial periods of inactivity, and untimely and reactionary steps.
(7-2-1: Weddle for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Russell v. Booneville Police Dept., 2024-CP-00757-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the dismissal of a lawsuit under the MTCA, holding that the circuit court did not err in dismissing the claim for law of presuit notice.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Saddler v. State, 2024-CP-00099-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of a PCR motion because the trial court did not err in finding it was time-barred.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Hall v. Mitchell, 2024-CA-00667-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming the circuit court’s judgment for the defendant after bench trial, holding that the trial court’s decision that a parked county-owed truck was not the proximate cause of an collision between the decedent’s motorcycle and an SUV.
(8-2-0: McCarty for the Court; Wilson, Westbrooks, and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Cunningham v. State, 2023-KA-01213-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing the defendant’s jury instructions on self-defense, imperfect self-defense, and culpable-negligence manslaughter; that the trial court’s did not err in denying a pretrial motion and refusing proposed jury instructions regarding lost body-camera footage; that the trial court erred harmlessly in admitting the victim’s statement to EMTs; that the trial court did not “improperly console” the victim’s mother in the courtroom by expressing sympathy while admonishing her to keep her composure; that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the overwhelming weight of it; and that the cumulative error doctrine did not apply.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Hopkins v. Perry, 2024-CA-00467-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s custody order, holding that the chancellor did not err in modifying visitation modification but remanding for an Albright analysis of the legal custody issue.
(9-0: Carlton for the Court; Westbrooks did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Horne v. Dolgencorp LLC, 2024-CA-00376-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2024-CA-00455-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of August 12, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions today. The Court also unleashed fourteen other orders, most of which are rehearing denials.

Parra v. Rapid-American Corporation, 2023-CA-01196-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal of a sixteen-year-old asbestos case for lack of prosecution, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion where there was a nine-year period of delay.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Taylor v. State, 2023-KA-01201-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of trafficking methamphetamine, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress evidence derived from a search that the defendant contended was defective.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing)

Tauzin v. Tauzin, 2024-CA-00141-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s order in a divorce case, holding that the chancellor did not err in interpreting or applying the parties’ antenuptial agreement, but that the chancellor did err in classification of marital property and by making insufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the Ferguson factors.
(8-0: Wilson for the Court; Carlton and Lassitter St. Pe’ did not participate)

Montoya v. State, 2023-KA-01324-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of three counts of touching a child for lustful purposes, holding that the trial court did not err in giving an instruction that the defendant argued was an improper comment on the evidence and that the defendant’s trial counsel was not ineffective.
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Childs v. State, 2023-CA-00126-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Foote v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport, 2023-CA-00504-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Thomas v. State, 2023-KA-00512-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00811-COA (denying rehearing)
  • McHard, McHard, Anderson & Associates, PLLC v. Robertson, 29230CA-00913-COA (granting appellees’ motion for appellate attorney’s fees and expenses)
  • Lee v. Doolittle, 2023-CA-00969-COA (denying rehearing)
  • McNaughton v. State, 2023-KA-01099-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Ruffin v. State, 2024-CA-00867-COA (denying the State’s motion to strike untimely motion for rehearing)
  • Pittman v. State, 2024-TS-00983-COA (granting motion for out-of-time appeal)
  • Cohen v. Trustmark National Bank, 2024-CP-01317-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of appealable judgment)
  • Black v. State, 2025-KM-00042-COA (denying motion to set aside dismissal of appeal)
  • Moore v. State, 2025-TS-00550-COA (allowing appeal to proceed on its merits)
  • Gales v. State, 2025-TS-00633-COA (granting pro se motion to proceed out of time)
  • Robinson v. State, 2025-TS-00700-COA (dismissing appeal for lack of appealable judgment)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 7, 2025

Happy New Year! Many thanks to all who read the blog over the past year, I truly appreciate your support. But that is all the time we have for sentimentality because the Mississippi Court of Appeals wasted no time getting back in the action. There are ten opinions today and you can read my summaries below.

Poole v. State, 2023-KA-01162-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motions for directed verdict of JNOV where the defendant failed to file a motion a suppress evidence and failed to contemporaneously object to the evidence being admitted.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing, St. Pe’ did not participate.)

Everett v. State, 2024-CP-00206-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the trial court’s dismiss of a “petition for judicial review” as time-barred because it was filed two and one-half years after the petitioner had exhausted his administrative remedies.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Begnaud v. Begnaud, 2023-CA-00822-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s decisions in a divorce case, holding that the chancellor erred in failing to value guns before awarding them to one party, in failing to consider the tax consequences of receiving funds from a retirement account, and in awarding a credit for child support payments.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

In re: Harvey; Chimento v. Schwark, 2023-CA-00398-COA (Civil – Wills, Trust, & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a will contest, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the testator had capacity, that there was not abuse or suspicious circumstances giving rise to a presumption of undue influence, that there was due execution, or that the proponent overcame the presumption of revocation.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Rencher v. State, 2024-CP-00008-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit.
(6-2-0: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle and St. Pe’ did not participate)

Jones v. State, 2023-CP-01247-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because the petitioner did not obtain permission from the Mississippi Supreme Court before filing the motion.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Walker v. Mississippi State Parole Board, 2023-CP-00919-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming dismissal of petition for judicial review of MDOC decision, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Boone v. State, 2023-KA-00684-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction two counts of gratification of lust, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and that the trial court did abuse its discretion in denying a motion in limine to exclude prior bad acts testimony or in giving an instruction re: sufficiency of the unsupported word of the victim.
(9-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Mount v. State, 2023-KA-00807-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding the defendant competent to stand and that the verdict was not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence regarding his sanity at the time of the offense.
(5-4-0: St. Pe’ did not participate)

Wilson v. Barnes-Wilson, 2023-CA-00945-COA (Torts – Other)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion where the plaintiff took no action of record for two years and then failed respond to the motion to dismiss for over a year and even then only after the case was dismissed.
(7-2-0: McDonald and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; St. Pe’ did not participate.)

Other Orders

  • Alexander v. State, 2022-KA-00977-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Campbell v. State, 2022-KA-01055-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Galang v. State, 2023-KA-00006-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Howell v. State, 2023-KM-00265-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Wilkerson v. Allred, 2023-CA-00393-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Harris v. State, 2023-KA-00460-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Brown v. State, 2023-KA-00658-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Haley v. State, 2023-CP-00918-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 22 and October 29, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions last week and seven this week. You can read summaries of the lot below.

October 22, 2024

Hampton v. State, 2023-KA-00068-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of first-degree murder and using a firearm during the commission of a felony, but vacating the consecutive five-year sentence for using a firearm during the commission of a felony where he was also sentenced to life.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Baur v. Ribelin, 2023-CA-00018-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming on direct and cross appeal in an adverse possession action, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying the claim for adverse possession or in confirming title in the rightful owner.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Johnson v. SW Gaming LLC, 2023-CA-00505-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the circuit court’s decisions granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment in an inadequate security case, holding that the evidence was not sufficient to establish an atmosphere of violence or actual or constructive knowledge that the assailant was a violent person and the evidence was not sufficient to establish garden variety negligence.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

In the Interest of A.R.H., a Minor: Malone v. Jackson County Dept. of Child Protection Services, 2023-CA-00420-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the youth court’s custody order, holding that the youth court was in its discretion to find aggravated circumstances warranting bypassing reasonable efforts for reunification and that there were no evidentiary errors.
(5-4: Wilson and Westbrooks dissented without writing; McDonnald dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty)

October 29, 2024

Banks v. Banks, 2023-CA-00515-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Dismissing appeal for want of an appealable judgment.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Ware v. State, 2023-CP-00909-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary denial of PCR motion, holding that the motion was time-barred and successive.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Morland v. Morland, 2023-CA-00237-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that it was in the child’s best interest to be in the mother’s exclusive custody subject to visitation, in calculation and award of child support to the mother, or in awarding the mother attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Mallard v. State, 2023-CP-01155-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the petitioner could not duck the successive petitions bar by proving any exceptions.
(7-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Sessums v. Chicken Nugget, Inc., 2023-CA-00128-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a premises liability case where the plaintiff tripped over two parking curbs, holding that the plaintiff did not come forward with evidence to prove that two abutting parking curbs created an unreasonably dangerous condition.
(9-0: Weddle did not participate)

Scott v. State, 2023-KA-00559-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of child abuse and conviction of life imprisonment without eligibility for parole for a father who abused his infant child, holding (1) that the admission of the father’s prior conviction for failure to register as a sex offender was not reversible error though it was error to refer to it as “failure to register as a sex offender” instead of “failure to register” which was the actual language in the prior sentencing order, (2) that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, and (3) the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(4-5-0: Wilson and Smith concur in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks, McDonald, and Lawrence concur in result only without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Tisdale v. South Central Regional Medical Center, 2023-CA-00231-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming dismissal for failure prosecute, holding that the trial court did not err in reviewing the motion under Rule 41(b) instead of Rule 37, did not miscalculate the delay and correctly found clear delay with no activity occurring to advance the case to judgment in over two years, and did not abuse its discretion in determining that anything less than a dismissal would be unjust.
(6-3: McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Lawrence dissented, joined by McCarty, and joined in part by McDonald)

NOTE – The dissent argued that the majority discounted the impact of COVID.

Other Orders

October 22, 2024

  • Weatherly v. Weatherly, 2022-CA-00804-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Signaigo v. Grinstead, 2022-CA-01212-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Jackson v. State, 2023-KA-00201-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Neal v. Cain, 2023-CP-00625-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Washington v. State, 2024-CP-00059-COA (granting pro se motion to recall mandate and accept untimely brief)

October 29, 2024

  • Wilson v. State, 2023-CA-00070-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Shanks v. State, 2023-CP-00271-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Davis v. State, 2023-KA-00636-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Bradley v. State, 2023-CP-0764-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page – October 22, 2024

Hand Down Page – October 29, 2024

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 15, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions today. Two are direct criminal appeals, one is a divorce case addressing child support and division of property, one is an easement case, and the other is a med mal case dismissed for lack of prosecution. Though he did not participate any of today’s decisions, newly minted Judge John D. Weddle made his debut on the hand downs today.

Chapman v. Chapman, 2023-CA-00615-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing findings of the chancellor in a divorce action, holding that the chancellor erred in his calculation of the father’s adjusted gross income and remanding for child support recalculation and holding that the chancellor erred concerning whether a boat was marital or non-marital property.
(5-4-0: Wilson and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Carlton and Westbrooks concurred in result only; Weddle did not participate)

Word v. U.S. Bank, 2023-CA-00160-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the chancellor’s judgment in an easement case, holding that the chancellor erred in awarding an easement by necessity because the plaintiff was not entitled to an easement by necessity and presented no evidence regarding the costs of using an available alternative access route.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Randall v. State, 2023-KA-00587-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault and first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in excluding evidence of one victim’s postmortem toxicology report showing the presence of recreational drugs in his system or in applying the firearm enhancement.
(8-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Eason v. South Central Regional Medical Center, 2023-CA-00261-COA (Civil – Medical Malpractice)
Affirming dismissal of a complaint for failure to prosecute a med mal case against a nursing home, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the case pursuant to Rule 41(b) after two years of delay.
(5-1-3: Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald dissented without writing; Lawrence dissented, joined by McDonald and McCarty; Westbrooks joined in part; Weddle did not particiapte)

N0te – The dissent’s position was that the COVID-10 pandemic was a mitigating factor and that the trial court’s failure to consider it was an abuse of discretion. It concludes:

Cauthen v. State, 2023-KA-00589-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of non-residential burglary, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of trespass.
(8-0: Emfinger and Weddle did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Archer v. Harlow’s Casino Resort & Spa, 2022-CP-01060-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Doss v. State, 2022-KA-01185 (denying rehearing)
  • Black v. State, 2022-KA-01223-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Jiles v. State, 2023-CP-00383-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of July 23, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eleven opinions yesterday. There are several direct criminal appeal, a couple of wills and estates cases, a personal injury case dismissed for want of prosecution, and an insurance coverage case. There is also a handful of PCR cases including one denial that was reversed and another denial that was vacated because the judge was disqualified.

Brown v. State, 2023-KA-00082-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of three counts of touching a child for lustful purposes and four counts of sexual battery, holding that the trial court did abuse its discretion in excluding the defendant’s mothers testimony that the victim had asked about what the repercussions would be if she lied and holding, that the indictment was legally sufficient, that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, and that there was no plain error affecting the defendant’s substantial rights.
(6-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing.)

Wren v. Zellers, 2023-CA-00152-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for want of prosecution, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion where there was a clear record of delay over the course of four years.
(5-3-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Smith did not participate)

Gibson v. State, 2023-KA-00821-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance, holding that upon review of counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record that there were no issues that warranted reversal.
(9-0)

Grayson v. State, 2023-KA-00400-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey breif and the record that there were no arguable issues that required supplemental briefing and affirming the trial court.
(9-0)

Bradley v. State, 2023-CP-00763-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the motion as successive.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

In re the Estate of Warren, 2023-CA-00438-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision after bench trial in a will contest and contest over inter vivos transfers, holding that the chancellor did not commit clear error in finding no confidential relationship, finding no evidence of undue influence, and finding that the testator had the requisite mental competence and testamentary capacity when he made the inter vivos transfers and executed his will, and granting a motion to strike an exhibit in the record excerpts that was not included in the lower court record.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Clark v. Alfa Ins. Co., 2022-CA-01251-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of declaratory and summary judgment in favor of an insurer, holding that the agricultural enterprise exclusion in the homeowner’s policy at issue applied to the plaintiffs’ claim against the insured after the plaintiffs’ vehicle collided with the insured’s cattle.
(9-0)

Brown v. State, 2023-CP-00171-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of motion for PCR seeking to set aside a guilty plea, holding that the motion was time barred.
(9-0)

Norman v. State, 2023-CP-00296-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing denial of PCR motions, holding that the circuit court erred by not considering whether the motion was timely under the UPCCRA and remanding for that purpose.
(5-4: Emfinger dissented, joined by Carlton, Wilson, and Smith)

Price v. State, 2023-CA-00941-COA (Civil – PCR)
Vacating and remanding the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit judge who denied the PCR motion was disqualified because she was the district attorney when the petitioner entered his guilty plea.
(9-0)

In the Matter of the Estate of Staten, 2023-CP-00228-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancery court’s denial of a motion to set aside a prior denial of a prior request to reopen an estate, holding that the appellant had waived her right to appeal issues that had been previously litigated and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion denying motions to set aside/reconsider.
(8-0: Smith did not participate.)

Other Orders

  • Jordan v. State, 2022-CP-00874-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Frazier v. State, 2022-KA-00896-COA (dismissing untimely motion for rehearing)
  • The Avion Group, Inc. v. The City of Oxford, 2023-CA-00169-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Weaver v. State, 2024-TS-00438-COA (dismissing utimely appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 11, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions today. There are four divorce-related decisions, two direct criminal appeals, a tort case dismissed for failure to state a claim, a negligence case dismissed for want of prosecution, and a PCR case.

Roley v. Roley, 2022-CP-01104-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s rulings in a divorce action, holding that that the chancellor did not err in denying appellant’s Rule 60 motion that was filed after the mandate from the appeal of the case had been entered because the mandate rule barred reconsideration and that the chancellor did not err in finding the appellant in contempt or in incarcerating him for it.
(8-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Lawrence did not participate)

Clark v. State, 2023-KA-00011-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of simple possession of a controlled substance, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief, appellant’s pro se brief, and the record that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and that there were no other issues to warrant reversal.
(10-0)

Scott v. State, 2022-KA-00830-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of touching a child for lustful purposes, nine counts of sexual battery, and one count of exploitation of a child, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for change of venue because the motion to change venue was procedurally defective and lacked merit.
(9-0)

Ware v. Ware, 2023-CA-00605-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce action, holding that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion finding that the martial home was a marital asset, in distributing the marital home equally between the parties, or in not making specific findings of fact and conclusions of law as to each Ferguson factor.
(10-0)

Hasley v. Hasley, 2023-CA-00914-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s ruling that temporary orders of separate maintenance had been converted to a final order of support, holding that the order being appealed was entered while the case was previously on appeal and that the issue sub judice was encompassed in the Court of Appeals’ prior ruling and remanding for further proceedings.
(8-2-0: Barnes and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Archer v. Harlow’s Casino Resort & Spa, 2022-CP-01060-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of the pro se plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint after the initial complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to plead fraud with particularity, holding that the proposed amended complaint failed to state a claim for relief.
(10-0)

Pace v. Pace, 2022-CA-01259-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and vacating in part the chancellor’s rulings in a divorce matter related to the sale of a jointly owned commercial building, holding that the chancellor lacked jurisdiction to grant one party’s contempt motion but affirming the chancellor’s decision ordering that party to buy the other party’s interest in the property and denial of the Rule 59 motion.
(10-0)

Jiles v. State, 2023-CP-00383-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of several PCR motions, holding that they were time-barred and successive and that and no exceptions applied, and that the remaining arguments were waived because he pleaded or because he did not raise them in the circuit court.
(10-0)

Ware v. Brown, 2023-CA-00663-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal of a negligence action for want of prosecution, holding that there was a clear record of delay including two granted motions to compel and a two-year effort to obtain one plaintiff’s relevant medical history, that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the complaint with prejudice in lieu of lesser sanctions.
(5-1(2?)-3(2?): Wilson and Smith concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part; joined by McCarty and Smith; Westbrooks did not participate.)

Other Orders

  • Patrick v. Patrick, 2021-CA-00891-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Okorie v. Nat’l Ass’n Wells Fargo Bank, 2022-CP-00043-COA (denying pro se motion for reconsideration)
  • Marshall v. State, 2022-KA-00541-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Roley v. Roley, 2022-CP-01104-COA (denying motions for reconsideration and for recusal of four judges of the Court of Appeals)
  • Hartzog v. State, 2024-TS-00033-COA (denying pro se “motion to show cause” and dismissing appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 21, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down a bounty of twelve opinions yesterday. I noticed a stray opinion from Thursday, May 9 so that is also summarized below. With a total of thirteen opinions, there is a lot of ground covered.

Martin v. State, 2023-KA-00044-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault and armed robbery after a trial in absentia, holding that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0)

Tilley v. Gibbs, 2022-CA-01150-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment awarding physical custody of a child to the father, holding that the chancellor did not err in his Albright analysis and that substantial, credible evidence supported the custody determination.
(10-0)

Hamer v. State, 023-CP-00701-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of relief and dismissal of PCR motion without an evidentiary hearing, holding that the PCR motion lacked sufficient support to warrant a evidentiary hearing.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

McVay v. State, 2022-KA-00523-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of four counts of capital murder and one count of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error in admitting evidence of prior bad acts during cross-examination of the defendant and holding that the defendant’s trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective for failing to object.
(7-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion; Carlton did not participate)

Jackson v. State, 2022-KA-01143-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and burglary and sentence to life without eligibility for early release, probation, or parole, holding that the indictment was not fatally defective; that there was no plain error in denying a motion to suppress the defendant’s statements to law enforcement where the defendant made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of Miranda; that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s proposed insanity defense and imperfect self-defense instructions; and that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-2-0: Wilson and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Practice Point – This is a handy citation to tuck away for one of those “I know its true by I can’t find a case that says so” situations:

Thompson v. State, 2023-CP-00218-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of the petitioner’s fourth and fifth PCR motions, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding them time-barred.
(10-0)

Smith v. West, 2023-CA-00297-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for failure to prosecute a personal injury case, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion after granting several continuances over nearly ten years since the action was commenced.
(10-0)

Signaigo v. Grinstead, 2022-CA-01212-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings in an adverse possession action, affirming the finding that the plaintiff could not prove the ownership element but reversing the finding that title was vested in the defendant as a matter of law because that issue was beyond the scope of the motion for summary judgment.
(8-2-0: Wilson and Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2022-CA-01175-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s findings in a divorce proceeding, holding that the chancellor did not err in the equitable division of marital property, in determining the amount of child support, in determining the amount of alimony, or in denying the mother’s request for attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Carr v. State, 2022-KA-00491-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the State did not commit prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments such that the court was required to intervene on its own initiative.
(10-0)

Pickens v. State, 2022-KA-00822-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of meth while in possession of a firearm, holding that after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and independently reviewing the record that there were no errors warranting reversal.
(10-0)

Hearn v. State, 2023-CP-00275-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding the motion time-barred and that no statutory exceptions applied.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

From May 9, 2024

Daniels v. State, 2022-KA-00705-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after the the defendant was convicted of one count of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder, three counts of aggravated assault, and one count of shooting into an occupied dwelling, holding that indictment’s error as to the count for murder was harmless so the conviction of the lesser-included offense of manslaughter was affirmed but holding that the indictment was legally insufficient as to aggravated assault counts and that the error was compounded by repetition in jury instructions and the State’s closing arguments.
4-1*-5: Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald, Lawrence and Smith (each of whom also joined the lead opinion); Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes, Carlton, Wilson, and McCarty.)

Other Orders

  • Arnold v. State, 2021-KA-01426-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Rutland v. Regions Bank, 2022-CA-00720-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Malone v. State, 2022-CP-00958-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Boyett v. Cain, 2022-CP-00978-COA (denying rehearing)
  • EEECHO Inc. v. Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, 2022-SA-01068-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Boyette v. State, 2022-CP-01239-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 21, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions on Tuesday. There are some interesting opinions in there including three opinions with civil procedure issues that civil litigators should take a look at. One deals with the discovery rule and the savings statute after a voluntary dismissal, another deals with a Rule 41 dismissal for want of prosecution, and the other deals with a Rule 56(f) motion in a med mal case.

The Supreme Court will not hand down decisions this week due to the Thanksgiving holiday. Have a Happy Thanksgiving!

Burns v. BancorpSouth Bank, 2022-CA-00404-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming dismissal of breach of contract and negligence claims that two banks were liable for not preventing an elderly lady’s caregiver from stealing money from bank accounts, holding that the claims against the banks were barred by the three-year statute of limitations.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Greenlee did not participate)

Harper v. State, 2022-KA-00659-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of attempted statutory rape and fondling, holding that the trial court did not err by admitting the victim’s out-of-court statements without determining whether the tender-years exception applied because the victim’s teacher’s testimony about what the victim said was not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted and that the forensic interviewing expert’s testimony did not constitute hearsay, and dismissing the ineffective assistance of counsel claims without prejudice.
(8-2-0: Enfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing and McDonald concurred in the result only without writing)

Agee v. State, 2022-KA-00994-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the Court did not err by imposing restitution and that the defendant waived that issue by not objecting during sentencing.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing)

Clearman v. Pipestone Property Services, LLC, 2022-CA-00651-COA (Civil – Personal injury)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of slip-and-fall claims against a contractor and subcontractor who provided snow and ice removal services for a grocery store on statute of limitations grounds, holding that the “discovery rule” did not apply, the voluntary dismissal of a timely federal court lawsuit against the grocery store did not bring the claims against the contractor and subcontractor within the ambit of the “savings statute,” and the doctrine of equitable tolling did not apply.
(10-0)

Galvan v. State, 2022-KA-00655-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of statutory rape, sexual battery, gratification of lust, and incest, holding that the trial court did not err by not appointing an interpreter or by admitting the defendant’s statements to law enforcement, that the defendant waived objections based on the Confrontation Clause, that there was sufficient evidence to support the incest conviction, and that the defendant failed to prove ineffective assistance of counsel.
(9-1-0: Carlton concurred in result only without writing)

Rawlings v. Rawlings, 2022-CA-00919-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s denial of the ex-wife’s request for attorney’s fees after denying the ex-husband’s request for alimony modification, holding that she was not entitled to attorney’s fees under the marital dissolution agreement providing that the prevailing party in an enforcement action was entitled to attorney’s fees because this was an action to “modify” the agreement not “enforce” it.
(10-0)

Scott v. UnitedHealthcare of Mississippi, Inc., 2022-CA-00963-COA (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming dismissal for want of prosecution where an 18-month period of inactivity followed the filing of the compliant, interrupted only by some activity prompted by the circuit clerk’s notice of intent to dismiss under Rule 41, that then followed by another 18-month period of inactivity and a second Rule 41 notice, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the case even though the plaintiff filed a “Motion to Leave Case on the Docket” after the second Rule 41 notice and that the Court otherwise had inherent power to dismiss for want of prosecution.
(8-2-0: McDonald and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

NOTE – The Court was not persuaded by the plaintiff’s efforts to assign blame to the COVID pandemic. The plaintiff argued:

The Court addressed this argument later in the opinion:

Hogan v. Hattiesburg Clinic, P.A., 2022-CA-00650-COA (Civil – Medical Malpractice)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of the plaintiffs’ 56(f) motion filed the day before the motion for summary judgment hearing, holding that the plaintiffs’ 56(f) motion did not mention the need to obtain additional expert medical opinions and the plaintiffs had not otherwise shown that additional expert opinion could establish proximate cause.
(8-1-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion; Carlton did not participate.)

Other Orders

Love v. State, 2021-CP-01101-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page