Tag: MTCA

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 1, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. One case is a relatively novel appeal of a chancellor’s decision denying a name-change petition. There is also an MTCA/breach of contract/inverse condemnation case along with a couple of felony appeals and a couple of PCR cases.

Haralson v. State, 2023-CP-01309-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion challenging revocation of post-release supervision, holding that the trial court did not err in summarily dismissing the motion.
(10-0)

Hatchett v. State, 2024-KA-00100-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of sexual battery, holding that the conviction was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Hulitt v. State, 2024-CA-00182-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of motion for PCR, holding that the trial court that adjudicated the charged offenses to which he pleaded guilty was a county of venue.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Emfinger did not participate)

Rogers v. City of Lumberton, 2023-CA-01133-COA (Civil – Property Damage)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the circuit court’s order granting the City’s motion to dismiss, holding that the trial court did not err in dismissing the plaintiff’s negligence claims for non-compliance with the pre-suit notice requirements of the MTCA or in dismissing the breach of contract claim, but that the trial court did err in dismissing the inverse condemnation claim because it was not subject to the pre-suit requirements of the MTCA.
(10-0)

In Re Name Change: Petitioner Yasmine Montia Jones, By and Through Her Guardian and Conservator, John D. K. Taylor, 2023-CA-01343-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision denying a petition to change the last name of a adult woman with disabilities, holding that the chancellor improperly substituted his judgment for that of the guardian without sufficient evidentiary support.
(8-2: Wilson dissented, joined by Lawrence)

Phinizee v. State, 2023-KA-01090-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of conspiracy and attempt to commit murder, holding that the conviction for conspiracy to commit murder was supported by sufficient evidence, that the trial court did not err by excluding hearsay testimony that the victim previously attacked the defendant, and that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s requested instruction on the lesser offense of aggravated domestic violence.
(10-0)

Other Orders

  • Pilot Travel Centers, LLC v. Womack, 2023-CA-00035-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Alexander v. State, 2023-KA-00331-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Williams v. State, 2023-KA-00346-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Patton v. State, 2023-CP-00618-COA (denying rehearing)
  • The University of Mississippi Medical Center v. Redd, 2023-CA-00711-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Mallard v. State, 2023-CP-01155-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 25, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. One opinion is an appeal from a hybrid MTCA/common law med mal trial that cites a law journal article I wrote several years ago on an unresolved procedural conundrum. There is also a premises liability summary judgment case, a breach of contract/attorney’s fees case, three direct criminal appeals, and two PCR cases.

Brown v. State, 2023-CA-00921-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR, holding that the trial court did not err in summarily dismissing the PCR petition as time-barred.
(10-0)

Foote v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport, 2023-CA-00504-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the circuit court’s judgment in a med mal action against a hospital (a public entity) and a surgeon and the surgeon’s clinic (private entities) after a single, bifurcated bench and jury trial in which the trial court dismissed the claims against the hospital, holding that if the trial court relied on counsel’s closing statements as evidence it was error but harmless because there was sufficient evidence on the point, that the trial court did not err in finding that the plaintiff failed to present a prima facie case that the surgeon proximately caused or contributed to the injuries, and that the plaintiff failed to object to the jury’s involvement in the MTCA claim so the trial court did not err in partially bifurcating the trial where the jury decided the claims against the private defendants and gave an advisory verdict as to the public defendant, and that the trial court did not err in allowing the jury to allocate fault to the public defendant and the finding that the allocation was not supported by substantial evidence.
(7-2-1: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing, Lawrence dissented)

NOTE – I was excited to see one of my law review articles cited in this opinion. (If you are so inclined, you can read my article here.) There is no clear guidance from the rules or case law as to how trials should proceed when there a public defendant (entitled to a bench trial under the MTCA) and private defendant (entitled to a jury trial under Mississippi’s constitution, et al). I advocated for a specific procedure in the article that was cited in today’s opinion. In today’s case, the public defendant advocated for the procedure I proposed and the plaintiff argued for a different approach that involved the jury rendering an advisory verdict as to the public defendant. The trial court adopted the plaintiff’s approach. The plaintiff complained about the procedure on appeal, but the Court of Appeals held he could not argue that the trial court erred in following his proposal. Here is the Court of Appeals’ recapitulation of the argument following my proposal:

In 2016, the Rules Committee on Civil Procedure solicited input for a “Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure Revision Project.” I submitted a proposed amendment to Rule 38 along with a copy of my article:

I never did hear anything back.

Blumer v. Majestic Homes, LLC, 2024-CA-00163-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of a homeowner against a home builder awarding liquidated damages, attoyne’s fees, and expenses, holding that the trial court did not err entering a corrected order granting relief under Rule 60(b) since there had been no judgment expressly adjudicating the remaining claims and that the trial court did not err in dismissing the claims against the home builder in his individual capacity, but that the trial court did err in reducing the award of attorney’s fees.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Dewberry v. State, 2023-KA-01135-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of sexual battery, one count of fondling, and one count of child exploitation, holding that the trial court did not err in seating jurors after a Batson challenge and that a jury instruction did not constitute a constructive substantive amendment of a count in the indictment under the plain-error doctrine.
(10-0)

Rodriguez v. Diamondhead Country Club, 2024-CA-00238-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendant in a premises liability case, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that a one-half-inch height differential between sidewalk slabs was not a dangerous or unreasonably hazardous condition or in finding that there was no evidence to support a negligence per se claim under the ADA where the plaintiff was not disabled.
(10-0)

Thomas v. State, 2023-KA-00512-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting a Facebook post, that the trial court did not err denying a directed verdict under Weathersby, that the conviction was support by sufficient evidence, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress the defendant’s statements to law enforcement, that the trial court did not err in admitting autopsy photos, and that the cumulative error doctrine did not apply.
(8-2-0: Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Rasberry v. State, 2023-KA-01161-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of failing to register as a sex offender, holding that the lack of specificity in the indictment was at most harmless error, that the trial court did not err by granting an unopposed motion to amend the indictment, and that trial counsel was not ineffective.
(10-0)

Deer v. State, 2024-CP-00019-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court properly dismissed the motion pursuant to the UPCCRA’s three-year statute of limitations.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Other Orders

  • None

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 21, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down five opinions on November 21, 2024, while I was out. Here are summaries of those decisions – two custody/parental rights cases, two felony appeals, and a certified question answer regarding the interplay between the MTCA and the MWPA.

Bell v. State, 2023-KA-00801-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that after consideration of counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record that there were no issues warranting appellate review.
(9-0)

S.D.P. v. Harrison County Department of Child Protection Services, 2023-CA-00838-SCT (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the youth court’s judgment terminating parental rights regarding a medically fragile child, holding that the youth court’s decision was based on clear and convincing evidence that the parents were not mentally, morally, or otherwise fit and that reunification was not desirable toward obtaining a satisfactory permanency outcome.
(9-0)

Johnson v. Miller, 2024-FC-00419-SCT (Civil – Federally Certified Question)
Answering a certified question from the Fifth Circuit, holding that the Mississippi Tort Claims Act’s statute of limitations and notice requirements do not apply to the Mississippi Whistleblower Protection Act.
(9-0)

Myers v. State, 2023-KA-01083-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of shooting into a dwelling and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error regarding jury instructions because the instruction on the elements of shooting into a dwelling did not constitute an impermissible constructive amendment to the indictment.
(9-0)

In Re the Adoption of J.J.W.B: J.B. v. M.M., 2023-IA-00457-SCT, consolidated with 2023-IA-00458-SCT (Civil – Custody)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision denying a motion to dismiss a grandmother’s motion to set aside an adoption because the motion to set aside was untimely and no jurisdictional issues were present to set aside the adoption, but affirming the chancellor’s decision that the adoption did not extinguish the grandmother’s visitation rights and properly denied the motion to dismiss the grandmother’s contempt action and remanding for further proceedings to determine post-adoption visitation.
(5-4-0: Coleman concurred in part and in the result without writing; King concurred in part and in the result, joined by Randolph and Kitchens, and joined in part by Coleman and Griffis)

Other Orders

  • In Re: Rules of Discipline for the Mississippi Bar, 89-R-99010-SCT (appointing or reappointing Alicia S. Hall, Assistant Dean Mary Largent Purvis, District Attorney Angel Myers McIlrath, Municipal Judge Robert Fant Walker, Robert E. Quimby, and Circuit Judge Michelle Easterling to three-year terms)
  • Bell v. State, 2023-KA-008001-SCT (denying second motion for reappointment of counsel and motion for rebuttal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 3, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down seven opinions today. It was a big day for real property and wills. There are also two criminal appeals, an MTCA personal injury case, and a PCR case.

Pham v. Miner, 2023-CA-00266-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the chancellor’s decision in a dispute over ownership of a parcel, holding that the chancellor erred in finding that a deed was defective and subject to interpretation with parol evidence and further that the chancellor failed to make a specific ruling on the adverse possession claim.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Estate of Forkner: Berry v. Forkner, 2023-CA-00707-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings related to the construction of a holographic will, holding that the chancellor did not err in admitting the will to probate, in finding that real property should pass by intestate succession, or in awarding personal property to one party, but reversing and remanding the issue of attorney’s fees for the chancellor’s failure to apply the McKee factors with supporting findings.
(8-1-1: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Lewis v. State, 2023-CP-01109-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary denial of PRC motion, holding that it was time-barred without applicable exception.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Booth v. State, 2023-KA-00906-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding after review of Lindsey brief and the record that there are no arguable issues on appeal.
(10-0)

Lucas v. State, 2023-KA-01015-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of malicious mischief, holding that malicious mischief is not a lesser-included offense of the indicted offense of burglary of a dwelling.
(9-1-0: Lawrence concurred in part and in result without writing)

Smith v. Anderson, 2022-CA-00959-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a dispute among cousins over 159 acres, holding that the chancellor did not err in dismissing a counterclaim of adverse possession or in “failing to address” affirmative defenses that were not pursued, and that an issue not raised in the chancery court was waived on appeal.
(10-0)

Berry v. Jackson County, 2023-CA-00643-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the County in an MTCA suit stemming from a collision with a suspect who was fleeing law enforcement, holding that the plaintiff did not present evidence that the County acted in reckless disregard of her safety.
(5-3-0: Wilson and McDonald concurred in part and in result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; Lawrence and Smith did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Hyland v. State, 2023-CA-00256-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Aldridge v. South Tippah County School District, 2023-CA-00418-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Estate of Johnson: Manners v. Estate of Johnson, 2023-CA-00823-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 12, 2024 (and one from November 7)

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions today: one MTCA personal injury case, one direct criminal appeal, and one claim against the parole board. The Court also handed down one opinion on Thursday of last week in a direct criminal appeal.

Alexander v. State, 2023-KA-00331-COA (Criminal – Felony) (Nov. 7, 2024)
Affirming conviction of six counts of exploitation of a child and sentence to forty-years for each court to run consecutively, holding (Part One) that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to sever the six counts of child exploitation; the trial court did not err in denying a generic motion to exclude prior bad acts or in ruling on subsequent objections to testimony of prior bad acts during trial; the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s objections during trial to opening statement comments, to questions during various witness examinations, or to the introduction of a photographs of the defendant and a victims; the trial court did not err in denying a motion for mistrial after a witness mentioned conduct related to one of the severed counts; (Part Two) there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction; the verdicts were not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence; and the sentence was not grossly disproportionate to the crimes.
As to Part One, 8-1: McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing; Carlton did not participate.
As to Part Two, 6-1-2: Wilson concurred in result only; Emfinger dissented in part, joined by Barnes; Carlton did not participate.

Allred v. Tishomingo County, 2023-CA-00569-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming judgment in favor of the County after an MTCA bench trial in a personal injury action that arose after a limb fell on the roof of the plaintiffs’ vehicle, holding that the County had no statutory duty to inspect or maintain the right-of-way, that the County had no actual or constructive notice that the tree was a dangerous condition, that the County did not proximately cause the damages, that the trial court’s analysis of expert testimony was not mainfestly wrong or clearly erroneous, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion admitting opinions from the County’s expert.
(10-0)

PRACTICE POINT– The County moved to strike the plaintiffs’ reply brief or portions of it on the grounds that it referenced materials that were not designated as part of the record on appeal. The Court denied the motion to strike as moot because it declined to consider the documents that were not in the record on appeal pursuant to M.R.A.P. 10 and 30(a).

Walker v. State, 2023-KA-00860-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of statutory rape, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress the interrogation video where the defendant argued his statement was improperly obtained after he requested counsel because the defendant did not actually invoke his Sixth Amendment right to counsel with regard to the charged offense, holding that the confession was voluntary, and holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-1-0: McCarty concurred in result only without writing)

Siggers v. Mississippi Parole Board, 2023-CP-00900-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of the petitioner’s “show cause motion” seeking the compel the Parole Board to show case as to why his parole was denied and was not set for hearing until 2025, holding that the trial court correctly determined that it lack authority to review the parole board’s decision to deny parole and set off the parole hearing.
(8-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

  • Scott v. State, 2022-KA-00830-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Morland v. Morland, 2023-CA-00237-COA (granting appellee’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees)
  • Weeks v. Weeks, 2023-CA-00427-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Walker v. Hasty, 2023-CA-00675-COA (denying motion for appellate attorney’s fees)
  • Corr Properties, LLC v. Proctor, 2023-CA-00782-COA (granting motion for appellate attorney’s fees)
  • Miller v. State, 2023-CP-00812-COA (dismissing motion for rehearing as untimely)
  • Thadison v. State, 2024-TS-00389-COA (granting pro se motion to recall mandate and reinstate appeal)
  • Mallett v. State, 2024-TS-01091-COA (allowing appeal to proceed as appellant’s response to show-cause notice was well taken)
  • Rodgers v. State, 2024-TS-01116-COA (suspending deadline to appeal pursuant to M.R.A.P. 2(c) and allowing appeal to proceed)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of November 5, 2024 and Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 7, 2024

In what was certainly the biggest new story from Tuesday, the Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down five opinions. Today, the Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion and one order amending the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure. You can read about all below.

Mississippi Court of Appeals – November 5, 2024

Patton v. State, 2023-CP-00618-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the motion was successive and untimely with no available exceptions and that the motion was meritless.
(9-0: Smith did not participate)

Slade v. City of Lumberton, 2023-CA-00830-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a MTCA personal injury case stemming from a police pursuit, holding that the trial court did not err in finding no reckless disregard based on the undisputed facts and that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to recuse based on the judge’s prior representation of the City.
(6-3: McDonald dissented, joined by Westbrooks and McCarty; Weddle did not participate)

McDill v. Scott County School District, 2023-CA-00956-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing summary judgment in an MTCA case stemming from a student’s weightlifting injury at school, holding that the school district was not entitled to discretionary-function immunity.
(10-0)

The University of Mississippi Medical Center v. Redd, 2023-CA-00711-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming a bench trial verdict of $500,000 in a med mal case, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings that the doctor breached the standard of care by not ordering lab work or further testing which, in turn, would have revealed the infection and prevented the amputation, and holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony of an orthopedic surgeon who primarily practiced in a different subspecialty than the treating doctor.
(8-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Morgan v. Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi, 2023-CA-00379-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in a personal injury case where the plaintiff was struck by poolside cushions blowing in the wind while she was closing out her tab at the swim-up bar, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that they cushions were not an unreasonably dangerous condition and that there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant.
(7-3: Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald and Lawrence)

Other Orders

  • Sinquefield v. The City of Ridgeland, 2022-CA-01276-COA (denying rehearing)
  • In Re Estate of Warren: Warren v. Maharrey, 2023-CA-00438-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court – November 7, 2024

Childress v. State, 2023-KA-01323-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of it.
(9-0)

Other Orders

  • In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (amending M.R.C.P. 62 – the order states that the amendment is effective 30 days after the date of the order which was entered on October 31, 2024)

Here are the amendments to Rule 62 (subsections (c) through (h) were not altered):

  • Mississippi State University v. Zhang, 2024-M-00344-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Hertz Jackson Three, LLC v. Sanders, 2024-M-00497-SCT (denying interloc)
  • Mississippi Baptist Medical Center, Inc. v. Butler, 2024-M-00930-SCT (denying interloc)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of October 1, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down nine opinions yesterday. There is just one criminal case and the rest are civil cases that run the gamut of practice areas from the statute of frauds to a hunting club dispute.

Smith v. Estate of Watson, 2023-CA-00761-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Reversing the chancellor’s judgment ordering the payment of creditor’s claims, disbursement of remaining assets, and closing the estate, holding that the chancellor failed to follow the statutory procedure for administering the insolvent estate.
(8-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Lowe v. Wall Doxey State Park, 2023-CA-00828-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal of an MTCA personal injury case, holding that the trial court properly found that the State was not properly served with presuit notice because Plaintiff did not sent notice to the correct state entity.
(9-0)

Stallworth v. Mississippi Department of Employment Security, 2022-CC-01300-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming MDES Board of Review’s decision finding that the claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits, holding that the Board’s decision was substantial evidence and was neither arbitrary nor capricious where evidence showed that the claimant voluntarily left work without good cause.
(7-2-0: Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Mazie v. Boozier-Mazie, 2023-CA-00470-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming order granting a motion to enforce a judgment of divorce and finding the ex-husband in contempt and denying a new trial, holding that the chancellor acted within her discretion to find the ex-husband in contempt for not complying with the court’s judgment.
(8-0: Westbrooks did not participate)

Walker v. Hasty, 2023-CA-00675-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s judgment modifying visitation and increasing child support obligation, holding that arguments that the trial was unfair were waived and without merit, that modifying visitation was not a change in custody, that there was substantial evidence to support the chancery court’s findings, and that the court did not prohibit one party from making a proffer and that party failed to make a proffer.
(8-0: Westbrooks did not participate)

Howard v. Nelson, 2023-CA-00947-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming dismissal of a case seeking specific performance enforcing an oral contract to sell land, holding that the statute of frauds applied.
(9-0)

Gandy v. State, 2023-KA-01017-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of sexual battery and two counts of gratification of lust, holding that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-0)

Short v. The Break Land Company, LLC, 2022-CA-01180-COA (Civil – Torts)
Affirming judgment on the pleadings in a dispute between landowners and an LLC that owned adjacent property for a hunting club of which the landowners were members that arose from the landowners wanting to shoot deer that were damaging their crops and the hunting club’s apparent retaliatory rule adoption and ultimate revocation of the landowner’s membership, holding that the landowners failed to state a claim for any causes of action, that the operating agreement barred the landowners’ claims, and that the trial court did not err not allowing the landowners to amend their complaint where they made no request of the trial court.
(8-0: Lawrence did not participate)

Long v. State, 2023-KA-00351-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, holding that the claim trial counsel committed a Batson violation was procedurally barred and without merit, that the trial court did not err in denying the motion for directed verdict, and that the spoliation argument that the State lost photographs of the crime scene was procedurally barred and without merit, and declined to address Plaintiff’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim on direct appeal.
(7-2: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Other Orders

  • Clemmons v. State, 2022-CA-00700-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Designer Custom Homes, LLC v. U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies, LLC, 2023-CA-00207 (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of August 8, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One is a direct criminal appeal addressing, among other things, an indecent technical difficulty during a witness examination via Zoom. The other is a decidedly less salacious civil case applying the MTCA’s presuit notice requirement.

Williams v. State, 2022-KA-01017-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the conviction was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and that the trial court did not err by denying motions for mistrial after an outburst from the victim’s mother or after an technological error caused an explicit video to be played in the courtroom during a voir dire qualification examination of an expert via Zoom where the trial court took corrective action after each incident.
(9-0)

Note – Zoom proceedings took a massive “L” in this one.

The City of Jackson v. Jones, 2023-IA-00394-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing the denial of the City’s motion for summary judgment in an MTCA claim, holding that the plaintiff did not comply with section 11-46-11(2) by failing to serve the city clerk with presuit notice.
(8-0)

Other Orders

  • In Re: Uniform Chancery Court Rules, 89-R-99006-SCT (dismissing Motion to Amend the Uniform Rules of Chancery Court Practice to Add a New Rule Requiring Attorneys Representing Out-of-State Petitioners in Adoption Proceedings to Certify Compliance With Statutes Enacted to Prevent Commercialization of Adoptions filed by the Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services)
  • Brandi’s Hope Community Services, LLC v. Walters, 2022-CT-00188-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Moore v. State, 2022-CT-00327-SCT (denying cert)
  • Silver Dollar Sales, Inc. v. Battah, 2022-CT-00476-SCVT (denying cert)
  • Harris v. Ratcliff, 2022-CT-00596-SCT (denying cert)
  • Edwards v. State, 2022-CT-00719-SCT (denying extension request and dismissing cert petition as untimely)
  • Clark v. State, 2022-DR-00829-SCT (denying Motion for Leave to Interview Members of the Venire Who Did Not Serve on the Petit Jury)
  • Frazier v. State, 2022-CT-00896-SCT (dismissing cert petition as untimely)
  • EEECHO Inc. v. Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, 2022-CT-01068-SCT (denying cert)
  • Harvey v. State, 2023-CT-00157-SCT (denying cert)
  • Clark v. State,  2024-M-00201-SCT (denying Petition for Permission to Appeal Circuit Court’s Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion for Discovery)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 4, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions today. There is a paternity/child support case, a custody/termination of parental rights case, an MTCA personal injury case, a contract case, a slip-and-fall summary judgment, and three direct criminal appeals.

Myles v. Lewis, 2022-CA-01192-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s rulings in a paternity action, holding that the chancellor erred in computing monthly child support by failing to account for the father’s significant income increase and personal withdrawals, inaccuracies in his financial statement, and admitted commingling of personal and business expenses; holding that the chancellor did not err in not requiring the father to pay half of the child’s private school tuition, insurance premiums, and extracurricular fees; and holding that no party was entitled attorney’s fees.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in result without writing)

Lemay v. City of Biloxi, 2023-CA-00469-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the City in an MTCA case stemming from a collision with a police officer, holding that although the trial court incorrectly ruled that the plaintiff was precluded from recovery because she was allegedly speeding, the summary judgment should affirmed because the undisputed evidence showed the officer was engaged in police protection activity and that he did not act with reckless disregard.
(7-2-0: Carlton and Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence did not participate)

Hattie T. v. Matthew R., 2022-CP-00926-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancery court’s final judgment terminating parental rights, holding that the chancellor did not err in denying the mother’s motion to dismiss and that the chancellor’s decision terminating parental rights was supported by clear and convincing evidence and was in the best interests of the children.
(10-0)

Collins v. State, 2022-KA-01184-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of kidnapping, armed robbery, armed carjacking, aggravated assault, conspiracy to commit kidnapping, and conspiracy to commit armed robbery, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of other acts and crimes coupled with a limiting instruction, in excluding evidence of the defendant’s assault in prison by two witnesses, or in refusing the defendant’s instructions on lesser included instruction.
(7-2-0: McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Terry v. State, 2022-KA-01194-COA, consolidated with Thomas v. State, 2022-KA-01278-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of two defendants (Terry and Thomas) for first-degree murder and drive-by shooting, holding that though the trial court abused its discretion in admitting surveillance video the error was harmless, that Terry’s conviction was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting text messages because they were not hearsay.
(10-0)

Designer Custom Homes, LLC v. U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies, LLC, 2023-CA-00207-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s reversal of the county court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a breach of contract case, holding that the circuit court erred by reversing on an issue and argument that were not raised in the county court or briefed on appeal and erred by finding that there was evidence in the record that presented a genuine issue of material fact.
(10-0)

Practice Point – Don’t rehash your trial court pleadings on appeal:

If the appeal process is daunting or simply pulling you away from other work you would rather do, your friendly neighborhood appellate attorney would love to visit with you about it.

Anderson v. SW Gaming LLC, 2023-CA-00345-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming summary judgment for the defendant in a slip-and-fall case, holding that there was no evidence that the defendant caused water on the floor in the bathroom or that the defendant had either actual or constructive knowledge that there was water on the floor.
(10-0)

Harrera v. State, 2022-KA-01167-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of kidnapping, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence, that the kidnapping instruction did not constructively amend the indictment (an issue that was procedurally barred and without merit), and that the trial court did not err by giving the State’s accomplice liability instruction.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Other Orders

  • Allen v. State, 2022-KA-00419-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Minor v. State, 2022-KA-00990-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of May 30, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down five opinions today. There is an MTCA case, a premises liability case, an unpaid wages case against MDOC, an insurance coverage case, and a workers’ comp/third-party case.

Yazoo City, Mississippi v. Hampton, 2022-IA-01284-SCT (Civil – Property Damage)
Reversing denial of summary judgment in a case seeking to hold the City liable for alleged ineffective firefighting and alleged resulting cardiac stress, holding that the City was immune under the MTCA from both property damage and personal injury liability where the evidence did not support a finding of reckless disregard by the fire department.
(9-0)

St. Dominic-Jackson Memorial Hospital v. Martin, 2023-CA-00285-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing judgment on a jury verdict in case stemming from a fall in an emergency room parking lot, holding that the evidence did not require judgment in the defendant’s favor but that the trial court erred by granting a negligence per se instruction and remanded for a new trial.
(9-0)

Mississippi Department of Corrections v. McClure, 2022-IA-01201-SCT (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over a former probation officer’s claim for unpaid wages for work with the MDOC, holding that Mississippi courts have jurisdiction to hear state employees’ claims against their employers for breach of contract and that the exhaustion doctrine did not apply because there was not adequate administrative remedy.
(9-0)

VT Halter Marine, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters of Lloyd’s of London Subscribing to Policy Number B0507M17PH04660, 2023-CA-00019-SCT (Civil – Insurance)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of an insurer in a suit by an insured seeking coverage for costs incurred in repairing and replacing flange plates that failed due to faulty workmanship, holding the insurance policy unambiguously excluded the cost of replacing or repairing improper or defective materials.
(9-0)

Brent v. Mississippi Dept. of Human Services, 2022-CT-00529-SCT (Civil – Workers’ Compensation)
Reversing the decision of the Mississippi Court of Appeals that affirmed trial court’s decision allowing the intervening employer/carrier’s EME costs be included in the statutory lien, holding that the EME was not a “reasonable and necessary medical expense” and therefore not properly included in the lien amount.
(9-0)

Other Orders

  • DeJohnette v. State, 2022-CA-00249-SCT (denying cert)
  • Chambliss v. Chambliss, 2023-CT-00087-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page