Tag: MTCA

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 30, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions on Tuesday. I had court in Union County that took me out of the office most of the day Tuesday. I then spent Wednesday making up for being out of the office on Tuesday, as one does. (Obligatory courthouse picture, infra.)

Taylor v. Johnson, 2022-CA-00734-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming grant of summary judgment in a car wreck negligence case, holding that there was no competent summary judgment evidence that the defendant proximately caused the collision, and then affirming summary judgment on the direct-negligence and punitive damages claims as moot.
(8-1-1: McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Westbrooks dissented without writing)

Whiddon v. State, 2022-KA-00616-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, aggravated assault of a law enforcement officer, and fleeing a law enforcement officer, holding that the trial court did not err in denying motions to dismiss for lack of speedy trial, that the circuit court abused its discretion in excluding videotaped witness statements but that the error was harmless, that the court did not commit reversible error in commenting in front of the jury that a witness was “an excellent investigator,” that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-3-0: McDonald and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Wilson concurred in the result only without writing)

Turner v. Turner, 2023-CA-00216-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing dismissal of complaint for divorce, holding that the chancellor erred by considering matters outside of the pleadings when ruling on a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) without converting it into a motion for summary judgment and providing necessary notice.
(10-0)

Suarez v. State, 2023-KA-00526-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary of an occupied dwelling under circumstances likely to terrorize the occupant, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant’s lesser-included-offense jury instruction.
(7-3-0: Wilson, McDonald, and McCarty concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Harris v. State, 2023-CP-00227-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion following probation revocation, holding that the trial court’s failure to inquire about the petitioner’s ability to pay his fees and assessments was harmless error at most.
(10-0)

Crawford v. East Miss. State Hospital, Inc., 2022-CA-00753-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming judgment in favor of a hospital in a wrongful death lawsuit after bench trial, holding that the circuit court did not err in finding that the plaintiff did not prove the proximate cause element or in denying the plaintiff’s claim for the decedent’s “lifetime damages” because the estate was initially a party before being removed as a party via amendment to the complaint.
(6-2: McCarty concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks; McDonald and Smith did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Mississippi Dept. of Rehab. Servs v. Butler, 2022-CA-00176-COA (rehearing denied)
  • Harris v. Ratcliff, 2022-CA-00596-COA (rehearing denied)
  • Simmons v. State, 2022-KA-01260-COA (rehearing denied)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 7, 2024

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions last Thursday. There is an appeal of the dismissal of an MTCA claim on summary judgment, an appeal of a Medicaid reimbursement-rate decision, and an appeal by a victorious pro se party. The headliner, however, is the appeal of Willie Godbolt’s convictions for the infamous 2017 shooting of eight people in Lincoln County.

Federinko v. Forrest County, Mississippi, 2023-CA-00204-SCT (Civil – MTCA)
Affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant, holding that the plaintiff failed to allege a tortious or negligent act with respect to the MTCA defendants’ decision not to conduct an autopsy or obtain postmortem blood and fluids.
(9-0)

Mississippi Division of Medicaid v. Women’s Pavilion of South Mississippi, PLLC, 2023-SA-00098-SCT (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision vacating Medicaid’s reimbursement-rate decision, holding that the administrative officer did not have to defer to Medicaid’s initial decision but was to make findings of fact and a determination of the issues presented.
(8-0: Beam did not participate)

Stratton v. McKey, 2023-CP-00451-SCT (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of the pro se plaintiff’s Rule 60 motion to vacate a judgment in his favor that awarded him possession of his classic truck and monetary damages.
(9-0)

Godbolt v. State, 2020-DP-00440-SCT (Criminal – Death Penalty – Direct Appeal)
Affirming conviction of four counts of capital murder, four counts of first-degree murder, two counts of kidnapping, one count of attempted murder, and one count of armed robbery garnering four death sentences, six life sentences, and two twenty-year terms, holding that the trial court did not err in (1) denying a motion to server; (2) transferring venue to a neighboring county (with a jury drawn from a distant county); (3) “limiting” voir dire where the process lasted four days and produced nearly 800-pages of transcript; (4) denying a motion to suppress statements made to media and law enforcement; (5) denying a motion to suppress evidence obtained from the defendant’s home, vehicle, cell phone, other electronic devices; (6) allowing the defendant’s wife to testify under Rule 601(b)(2); (7) admitting evidence of prior bad acts; (8) admitting 911 calls; (9) not ordering a psychiatric evaluation that the defendant opposed; (10) admitting Facebook messages over an authentication objection; (11) only allowing the defendant (who exercised his right not to testify) limited time for allocution during closing arguments; (12) denying motion to exclude victim impact evidence; and the Supreme Court also (13) deferred the ineffective assistance claim to the PCR phase; (14) held that there was no Brady violation regarding the destruction of the defendant’s phone after all data and information from the phone were given to the defendant; (15) that the defendant’s right to an impartial jury was not violated; (16) held that there was no evidence of prosecutorial misconduct; (17) that the “heinous, atrocious or cruel” aggravator was not unconstitutional; (18) that the death penalty was not unconstitutional; (19) that the death penalty was not disproportional; (20) and that there was no error, so the cumulative error argument was without merit.
(7-2: King dissented, joined by Kitchens)

NOTE– You should never treat my summaries as a substitute for reading cases that you intend to rely on. This is especially true in a case like this one. This is probably the longest summary I have posted, but I have only scratched the surface.

Other Orders

Love v. State, 2021-CT-01101-SCT (granting pro se cert petition)

Norwood v. Smith, 2021-IA-01404-SCT (dismissing interlocutory appeal)

Rehabilitation Centers, Inc. v. Williams, 2023-CT-00453-SCT (denying in part and dismissing in part petition for cert and reverse and stay of mandate or in the alternative petition for interlocutory appeal)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 30, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions today and three of them are at least a partial reversal. The lone affirmance was in an MTCA wrongful-death case stemming from a drowning. A PCR decision was affirmed in part and reversed in part, a post-divorce property division decision was reversed, and a police officer’s conviction of culpable-negligence manslaughter was reversed.

Malone v. State, 2022-CA-00281-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming in part and remanding in part the circuit court’s ruling in a PCR matter, holding that the circuit court did not err in rejecting the newly discovered evidence claim but holding that the circuit court erred by not addressing the ineffective assistance of counsel claim with specific findings or conclusions related to that claim.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Stephens v. City of Gulfport, 2022-CA-01008-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the city on an MTCA case stemming from a drowning, holding that Mississippi law does not “impose a duty on governmental entities to protect or warn against alleged dangerous conditions on property adjacent to property owned or operated by that governmental entity and not caused by the governmental entity” and that, in any event, the MTCA’s open and obvious defense applied to the river and barred the claim.
(9-1-0: Westbrooks concurred in result only without separate written opinion)

Thompson v. Thompson, 2022-CA-01014-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancellor’s property division ruling, holding that the judgment was a final, appealable order and that the chancellor erred in failing to conduct a proper Ferguson analysis.
(10-0)

Fox v. State, 2022-KA-00988-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of a police officer for culpable-negligence manslaughter against, holding that “[b]ased on the credible evidence presented at trial, no evidence establishes that Fox acted in a grossly negligent manner or that the victim’s death from minor abrasions was reasonably foreseeable under the circumstances,” that the verdict was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence (though this holding was relegated to a footnote) and holding that the circuit court abused its discretion by failing to give an accident or misfortune jury instruction.
(5-1-4: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Emfinger dissented, joined by Westbrooks, McDonald, and McCarty)

Other Orders

None

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 9, 2024

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions on Tuesday. Notably, not one of the decisions was a clean affirmance. There is a personal injury/MTCA decision, a riparian property damage case, a divorce decision, and an arbitration decision.

Mississippi Department of Rehabilitation Services v. Butler, 2022-CA-00176-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming on direct appeal and reversing on cross-appeal in an MTCA car wreck case, holding that the circuit court did err after holding a bench trial and finding that the defendant-driver was in the course and scope of her employment and her negligence was the sole proximate cause of the accident, but holding that the circuit court erred in not awarding damages for the loss of a cell phone and repair of a wedding band and that the circuit court erred in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for additur on the loss-of-consortium claim.
(9-0: Emfinger did not participate)

Hegman v. Adcock, 2022-CA-00501-COA (Civil – Property Damage)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the circuit court’s judgment affirming the county court in a riparian rights case, holding that the circuit court did not err in affirming the denial of the plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief and damages and the denial of the defendant’s Rule 52 motion, but reversing the circuit court’s decision affirming the court court’s finding the plaintiff liable on a tortious interference with business relations counterclaim and the $95,000 award on that counterclaim.
(8-2-0: Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Bolivar v. Bolivar, 2022-CA-00640-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Vacating the chancery court’s judgment on a motion for contempt in “highly contentious divorce proceedings,” holding that the movant was required to have a new Rule 81 summons for her fourth contempt motion “regardless of the status of the litigation.”
(10-0)

Coleman v. Stan King Chevrolet, Inc., 2022-CA-00943-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s dismissal of a motion to compel arbitration on the basis that the statute of limitations had run on the underlying claims, holding that where the defendants initially sought to compel arbitration but later obtained a default judgment on their counterclaim in the circuit court, the defendants’ rejection of the plaintiff’s attempt to proceed with arbitration justified relief under Rule 60(b)(6), holding that the circuit court erred in addressing the statute of limitations issue, and remanded for the matter to be restored to the active docket and stayed pending conclusion of arbitration proceedings.
(5-3-2: Lawrence and Smith concurred in part and in the result without writing; McCarty concurred in result only without writing; Greenlee dissented, joined by Enfinger)

NOTE – The proceedings in the circuit court were convoluted. It necessary to read the opinion to get a handle on what took place and the Court’s ruling.

Other Orders

Roberson v. State, 2021-CA-01182-COA (denying rehearing)

Carpenter v. State, 2022-KA-00398-COA (denying rehearing)

Davis v. State, 2022-KA-00573-COA (denying rehearing)

Boyington v. State, 2022-KA-00601-COA (denying rehearing)

Pickle v. State, 2022-CP-00929-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of September 19, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions today. There are two direct criminal appeals (including a reversal on sufficiency-of-the-evidence grounds), an appeal of summary judgment in an MTCA negligence claim, and claim by a constable for wrongful removal.

Love v. State, 2021-KA-01014-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part after the defendant was convicted of capital murder, aggravated assault, and armed robbery x3, holding that the trial court did not err in denying motion to sever, in denying motion for mistrial after brief exposure of wrist restraints to the jury venire, or in refusing a Milano instruction; that the indictment for capital murder was legally sufficient and the jury instruction on that count not erroneous; and that the defendant was not placed in double jeopardy, but that the evidence was not legally sufficient to support the armed robbery conviction.
(10-0)

J&A Excavation, Inc. v. City of Ellisville, 2022-CA-00533-COA (Civil – Other) consolidated with J&A Excavation, Inc. v. Jones County, 2022-CA-00547-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision that affirmed the Board of Aldermen and Board of Supervisors, holding that the decisions were not supported by substantial evidence and were arbitrary and capricious where the plaintiff’s low bid on a public construction contract was rejected and the next-lowest bid was accepted with no record evidence regarding qualifications, reputation, or capabilities of the bidder selected.
(10-0)

Bailey v. Jefferson County Board of Supervisors, 2022-CP-00950-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision affirming the Board of Supervisors’ decision to removal a constable, holding that there was not substantial evidence to support the removal, rendering judgment in favor of the constable, and remanding for a determination of damages.
(8-1: Emfinger dissented without separate written opinion.)

Moore v. Jackson Public School System, 2022-CA-00595-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Reversing summary judgment dismissing a negligence claim under the MTCA, holding that the circuit court erred by granting summary judgment on other grounds where the actual motion was based only on “broad legal arguments” that did not challenge the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s evidence.
(6-3: Carlton dissented, joined by Greenlee, Westbrooks, and McDonald)

Others Orders

Carroll v. State, 2021-CP-00959-COA (denying rehearing)

Ehrhardt v. State, 2021-KA-01143-COA (denying rehearing)

Jordan v. State, 2021-KA-01421-COA (denying rehearing)

In the Matter of the Estate of Roosa v. Roosa, 2022-CA-00128-COA (denying rehearing)

Rhodes v. RL Stratton Properties LLC, 2022-CA-00338-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of August 3, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion today but it is not an insignificant day. The opinion is in an MTCA reckless disregard case stemming from a police officer who crashed into a bystander vehicle while crossing an intersection en route to another accident scene. The trial court found for the City after a bench trial, the Court of Appeals reversed, and the Supreme Court granted cert.

Phillips v. City of Oxford, 2021-CT-00639-SCT (Civil – Personal Injury/MTCA)
Reversing the COA and reinstating/affirming the circuit court’s judgment for the City, holding that the record contained sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s decision that the officer did not act in reckless disregard while responding to a rollover wreck when he struck a bystander vehicle while crossing an intersection and exceeding the speed limit but also where he had his lights and sirens on and, when approaching intersections, he slowed his speed and used his horn as an additional warning.
(6-2: Kitchens dissented, joined by King. Maxwell did not participate.)

NOTE – This opinion emphasized the “deferential standard of review” for a bench trial under the MTCA and the fact that “reckless disregard” is an “extremely high bar” that is a higher standard than gross negligence.

Other Orders

In Re: Commission on Mandatory Continuing Legal Education, 89-R-99011-SCT (Reappointing George Scott Luter, Richard W. Sliman, and John Dickson Mayo to three-year terms (Aug. 1, 2023, through July 31, 2026) as members of the Commission on Mandatory Continuing Legal Education)

Colburn v. State, 2021-CT-00865 (denying cert)

In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2023-AD-000001-SCT (Directing the disbursement of $179,389.36 in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of July 6, 2023 (catch-up post)

On Thursday, July 6, the Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions. Two are direct criminal appeals and one is an civil appeal addressing the statutes of limitations for MTCA claims and state constitutional claims.

Stewart v. State, 2022-KA-00479-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth, holding that the defendant waived his Fourth Amendment and Miranda rights arguments by not raising them at trial court, and then waived plain error arguments on appeal by not raising them until the reply brief after the State asserted waiver, and further that the “sparse record” did not show plain error.
(9-0)

Moton v. Clarksdale, 2022-CA-00216-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Denying rehearing but withdrawing the original opinions and substituting another holding that the trial court correctly found that a city commissioner’s tort law claims stemming from his arrest were barred by the MTCA’s statute of limitations and that the claims arising under the Mississippi Constitution were barred by the general statute of limitations.
(9-0)

Mitchell v. State, 2021-KA-00589-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that there was insufficient evidence in the record to find that a due process violation occurred when the trial court denied the defendant’s request for the production of an autopsy report and then denied a request to conduct an autopsy.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Barber v. State, 2022-KA-00291-SCT (per curiam affimance)

Lofton v. Lofton, 2021-CT-00035-SCT (denying cert)

Clark v. Vicksburg Healthcare, LLC, 2021-CT-00173-SCT (denying motion to strike cert petition, granting motion to suspend the rules, accepting the filing of a cert petition, and denying cert)

Griffin v. State, 2023-M-00262 (denying mandamus)

Carr v. State, 2023-DR-00503-SCT (remanding PCR issues to circuit court)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of April 6, 2023

I am circling back to pick up the rest of the hand downs that I missed last week. The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down six opinions last Thursday with a couple of reversals. There were two skirmishes in med mal cases, one involved an arbitration agreement and the other the substitution of the administrator of an estate. There is a UM case about the right to UM benefits after cutting off the carrier’s subrogation rights. There is also a sixteenth section land case and what should have been an MTCA case. The Supreme Court also denied a petition for reinstatement to the practice of law.

Mississippi Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. Peteet, 2021-IA-01420-SCT (Civil – Insurance)
Reversing the denial of a motion to dismiss by a UM carrier, holding that the insured’s execution of a settlement agreement with the at-fault driver unlawfully cut off the UM carrier’s right of subrogation and the UM carrier therefore had no duty to pay the UM claim.
(9-0)

Sill v. State, 2021-KA-00317-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence found in his car because the defendant did not prove that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in a stolen vehicle, that the State met its burden to prove construction possession, and that the jury could reasonable infer that the untested substance was of the same substance as what was tested.
(9-0)

Belhaven Senior Care, LLC v. Smith, 2022-CA-00050-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming denial of a motion to compel arbitration, holding that the facility failed to prove that the signatory of the arbitration agreement was the resident’s healthcare surrogate, that the plaintiff was not barred by direct-benefit estoppel from contesting the validity of the arbitration agreement, and that the decdent was not a third-party beneficiary of the agreement.
(9-0)

North Bolivar Consolidated Sch. Dist. v. Jones, 2021-IA-01235-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Reversing the denial of the school district’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the school district’s past acceptance of late rent payments for sixteenth section land were not authorized and could not form the basis of estoppel that would prevent the school district from assessing statutory late-payment penalties.
(9-0)

Morton v. City of Clarksdale, 2022-CA-00216-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the dismissal of claims that an arrest violated constitutional rights, holding that most of the plaintiff’s claims fell under the MTCA and were barred by the MTCA’s one-year statute of limitations, that the constitutional claims were barred by the three-year statute of limitations, and that the malicious prosecution claim was barred by the one-year statute of limitations for such claims.
(9-0)

Otuseso v. Estate of Mason, 2021-IA-01099-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts and Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision removing the administratrix of an estate who had filed a wrongful death suit against a doctor on behalf of the estate and substituting two heirs-at-law as coadminstrators, holding that the doctor’s motion to intervene in the chancery court proceedings was moot since the chancellor had properly removed the unqualified administrator and appointed successor administrators.
(9-0)

Other Orders

Stewart v. The Mississippi Bar, 2022-BR-00382-SCT (denying fourth petition for reinstatement to the practice of law)

Virden v. Campbell Delong, LLC, 2021-CT-00478-SCT (granting cert)
I put this on the “cert watch” list when the COA opinion was handed down. It is a lawyer fight over money with a 5-5 COA decision that left the trial court’s ruling in place. (My summary of the COA decision is here.)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 21, 2023

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions on Tuesday. It was an eclectic mix, including a workers’ comp case, a dysfunctional two-member LLC , a wrongful death case against a sheriff’s deputy, and an inmate’s request for removal of a rule violation report.

Holloway v. King, 2021-CP-01351-COA (Civil – State Boards and Agencies)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision that affirmed the denial of an inmate’s request for the removal of a rule violation report, holding that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction because the petitioner did not comply with the notice requirements of UCRCCC 5.04.
(6-4: McCarty dissented, joined by Westbrooks, McDonald, and Lawrence.)

Myrick v. UMMC, 2021-WC-01401-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming MWCC order, holding that there was substantial, credible evidence to support the Commission’s finding that the Employer/Carrier overcame the presumption of permanent total disability and that the claimant’s post-injury back surgery was not related to her compensable back injury.
(7-3-0: Westbrooks, McDonald, and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Colson v. Warren, 2021-CA-01408-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming on direct and cross appeal the chancery court’s decisions denying a claim to dissolve a two-member LLC, holding that the two members should cooperate in drafting and implementing an operating agreement and opening a bank account to deposit rental revenue checks payable to the LLC that had been piling up.
(9-1-0: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion.)

Renfroe v. Parker, 2021-CA-01048-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the law-enforcement defendants in a wrongful death suit after a suspect was killed by a deputy, holding:
1. Res judicata did not bar the plaintiff’s state law tort claims after the federal district court dismissed her 1983 claims with prejudice and her state law claims without prejudice.
2. The deputy and the sheriff were entitled to immunity on the official-capacity claims
3. Collateral estoppel barred the claims for IIED, assault, and battery because the federal district court found that the deputy’s use of force was “objectively reasonable.”
4. Even if collateral did not bar the IIED, assault, and battery claims, the plaintiff did not come forward with evidence to defeat summary judgment.
(7-2: McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Westbrooks. Judge Emfinger did not participate.)

NOTE – According to testimony, the deputy shot the suspect after the suspect charged at the deputy, withstood a taser (pulling the electrodes out of his chest), had a physical altercation with the deputy, and then charged at the deputy a second time. The fact that the suspect did this while wearing pajama pants did not sway the courts at any level.

Other Orders

Green v. State, 2021-KA-01019-COA (rehearing denied)

Hand Down List

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 2, 2023

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one decision yesterday but also granted cert in an interesting MTCA case involving police-protection immunity that split the Court of Appeals.

State v. RW Development, LLC, 2021-CA-01134-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancery court’s judgment denying the City’s request for declaratory judgment declaring that it had the sole and exclusive authority to lease Public Trust Tidelands, holding that Mississippi statutory law grants the City the authority to lease the property to a developer for public use and to build a pier without “obtaining a redundant second grant of authority from the Secretary of State in the form of a lease.”
(6-3: King dissented, joined by Kitchens and Griffis.)

Other Orders

Curry v. State, 2018-M-01543 (granting application to file successive motion for PCR)

Towns v. Panola County Bd. of Supervisors, 2020-CT-01364-SCT (denying cert)

Wilson v. Lexington Manor Senior Care, LLC, 2021-CT-00072-SCT (denying cert)

Edwards v. State, 2021-CT-00261-SCT (denying cert)

Phillips v. City of Oxford, 2021-CT-00639-SCT (granting cert)

NOTE – This is an interesting cert grant in a police-protection immunity case that split the Court of Appeals 5-4 with the majority reversing the judgment in favor of the City. Here is my summary of the COA decision:

Phillips v. City of Oxford, 2021-CA-00639-COA (Civil – Personal Injury/MTCA)
Reversing the circuit court’s finding after a bench trial that the City was protected by police-protection immunity after an officer’s vehicle crossed an intersection against a red light and struck the plaintiff’s vehicle while the officer was responding to an emergency, holding that the facts of this case met the “exceptional circumstances” requirement for finding reckless disregard and that the officer acted with conscious indifference to the safety of the public and the certain parts of the police chief’s testimony were not credible.
( 5-4: Judge Lawrence dissented, joined by Judge Wilson, Judge Smith, and Judge Emfinger; Judge Greenlee did not participate.)

NOTE– The Court of Appeals declined the appellant’s invitation to adopt a “reckless disregard per se” rule and maintained the totality-of-the-circumstances analysis.

Jones v. State, 2021-CT-01088-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down List