Judicial Estoppel – Mississippi Appeals Blog

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of June 4, 2026

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down six opinions today. There are two decisions involving sanctions and/or contempt rulings. There is also a noteworthy judicial estoppel decision. The others are an election contest, a felony conviction, and an MDOC decision.

Walker v. Taylor, 2025-EC-00658-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of sworn petitions for judicial review of a primary-election contest, holding that a new election was not warranted based on alleged voter disenfranchisement or equal protection violations.
(6-0: Griffis for the Court; Branning did not participate)

Favre v. MDHS, 2024-IA-00880-SCT (Civil – Other)
Vacating Rule 11 sanctions, holding that the sanctioned parties were entitled to due process including notice and an opportunity to respond.
(7-0: Coleman for the Court)

Gombako-Amos v. Amos, 2023-CT-01253-SCT (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancery court and the Court of Appeals on cert, holding that there was no clear and convincing evidence of willful and deliberate violation of a court order to support a finding of civil contempt, rendering judgment on attorneys’ fees, and remanding to determine issues related to reimbursement.
(6-1: Griffis for the Court; Randolph dissented)

Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2024-CT-00455-SCT (civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the Court of Appeals’ reversal of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing on judicial estoppel grounds on cert, holding that the Court of Appeals did not err by reviewing the judgment de novo instead of abuse of discretion and that the trial court erred by not applying Fifth Circuit precedent in its analysis of the second element (a court accepted a previous position) of judicial estoppel.
(5-2: Randolph for the Court; Coleman dissented, joined by Branning)

Practice Point – I view this as a must-cite decision for judicial estoppel going forward.

Winters v. State, 2024-KA-01105-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault and attempted armed robbery, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-0: Sullivan for the Court)

Hudson v. MDOC, 2025-CA -00645-SCT (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming MDOC’s decision to not award trusty time due to conviction for attempted murder, holding that MDOC did not violate section 47-5-138.1 and that the denial of trusty time did not increase her sentence.
(7-0: Randolph for the Court)

Other Orders

In Re: Local Rules, 89-R-99015-SCT (granting motion seeking approval of revision to Local Rules for Fifth Chancery Court District)
Rules for Court Reporters, 89-R-99021-SCT (reappointing Hon. David P. Sullivan, Candace O’Barr Jones, Kati Vogt, and Latanya Allen as members of the Board of Certified Court Reporters for two-year terms from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2028)
Brown v. State, 2017-DR-01373-SCT (denying rehearing)
Upchurch v. Lewis, 2023-CT-01296-SCT (granting cert)
Jack v. City of Meridian, 2023-CT-01339-SCT (dismissing cert petition as untimely)
McLaurin v. State, 2024-CT-00138-SCT (denying cert)
Jones v. Jones, 2024-CA-00690-SCT (denying rehearing)
UMMC v. Giddens, 2024-CT-00842-SCT (denying cert)
Favre v. MDHS, 2024-IA-00880-SCT (dismissing motion for permission to file exhibit under seal as moot)
Walker v. State, 2024-CT-01032-SCT (denying cert)
Bivins v. Ellisville State School, 2024-CT-01098-SCT (denying cert)
In Re: Jones, 2024-CA-01307-SCT (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Triple Issue: Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 19, May 26, and June 2, 2026

I got covered up with paying work and had to let things slide around here for a bit. Here is three weeks of output from the prolific Mississippi Court of Appeals.

May 19, 2026

Small v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections, 2025-CP-00654-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming circuit court’s order denying complaint for judicial review, holding that the petitioner did not prove that MDOC’s decision was not supported by credible evidence, arbitrary or capricious, beyond MDOC’s scope of powers, or violative of constitutional rights.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

In Re: Order of Direct Criminal Contempt for Assistant District Attorney Andrew Willcutt, 2024-CA-01142-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing order holding an ADA in direct criminal contempt, holding that the ADA was entitled to notice of the charges against him and a de novo hearing before another judge.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Rush v. State, 2024-KA-01353-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of three counts of receiving stolen property, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Butler v. State, 2024-KA-00747-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that there was no error in admitting video to rebut the defendant’s testimony, that the use of impeachment evidence in closing was not improper, that admitting a heat of passion manslaughter instruction was not error, that the manslaughter instruction was not unconstitutional, that the claim for ineffective assistance of counsel was not ripe, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Brown v. State, 2025-CA-00428-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding it time-barred.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Gates v. State, 2024-CP-00074-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding it time-barred.
(7-3-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson, Westbrooks, and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Foreman v. State, 2024-KA-00728-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-2-1: Lawrence for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Carlton dissented without writing)

Waste Management of Mississippi, Inc. v. Chickasaw County, Mississippi, 2025-CA-00378-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s decisions denying summary judgment for Waste Management and granting summary judgment in favor of the County that sought to exercise an option to extend a solid waste agreement, holding that Mississippi law does not permit such agreements for more than 30 years so the plain language allowing for an extension to the extent it was consistent with Mississippi prevented the extension.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Rehm v. Robinson Property Group, LLC, 2025-CA-00043-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the dismissal of a personal injury on judicial estoppel grounds, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion dismissing the claim where the plaintiff failed to disclose the lawsuit during bankruptcy proceedings.
(7-3: Carlton for the Court; McDonald dissented without writing; Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald and McCarty)

Other Orders

Jenkins v. Jenkins, 2024-CA-00395-COA (denying rehearing)
Brown v. State, 2024-KA-00489-COA (denying rehearing)
Eloby v. State, 2024-KA-00529-COA (denying rehearing)
Jones v. State, 2024-KA-00760-COA (denying rehearing)

May 26, 2026

Coahoma County, Mississippi School District v. Williams, 2024-CA-00977-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision and rendering a decision in favor of the school board’s termination decision, holding that the school board’s decision to terminate a counselor who had an incident with another school counselor and said she needed a “license to carry” was supported by substantial evidence, that the chancery court exceeded the scope of review, and that the counselor’s due process rights were not violated.
(9-1-0: McCarty for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result only without written opinion)

Murphy v. State, 2024-KA-00664-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of attempted touching of a child for lustful purposes, holding that arguments related to jury instructions were procedurally barred for failure to raise then in a JNOV or new trial and, in any event, that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion instructing the jury.
(9-1-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Banks v. Banks, 2025-CA-00119-COA, consolidated with 2023-CA-00515-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing on direct appeal and cross appeal in a divorce case, holding that the chancellor erred in the equitable distribution of the marital estate, in awarding alimony, and in awarding attorney’s fees.
(8-2-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson and Lassitter St. Pe’ concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Qualls v. Qualls, 2023-KA-01112-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of being a felon in possession of a weapon following a fatal shooting at a bar but vacating and remanding the sentencing as violent habitual offender as the State conceded that the evidence at trial was not sufficient to establish habitual-offender status.
(8-0: Westbrooks for the Court; Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Watson v. State, 2024-KA-01149-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of felony child abuse, holding that arguments that the trial court erred by admitting testimony of prior bad acts were procedurally barred for lack of objection after the State filed a notice of intent to introduce the evidence before trial and that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions, and declining to address the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims.
(9-0: Wilson for the Court)

Patriot Inspects, LLC v. McKenzie, 2024-CA-01000-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the trial court’s decision denying a motion to compel arbitration, holding that the arbitration provision’s limitation of liability and one-year limitations period were substantively unconscionable and so intertwined with the agreement that the agreement was rendered unconscionable.
(6-4: Weddle for the Court; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes, Carlton, and Emfinger)

NOTE – I am putting this one on cert watch. Citing the Federal Arbitration Act, the dissent took issue with the majority’s holding that the arbitration agreement was rendered unconscionable by the limitation of liability and limitations period.

Other Orders

Moore v. State, 2024-KA-2024-01129-COA (denying rehearing)
Leggett v. State, 2024-CP-01214-COA (recalling mandate and accepting pro se motion for rehearing as timely)
Winn v. State, 2024-KA-01280-COA (denying rehearing)
Johnson v. State, 2024-KA-01348-COA (granting appellant’s pro se motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing)
Johnson v. State, 2025-TS-01344-COA (dismissing motion for post-conviction collateral relief for lack of jurisdiction)
Gray v. State, 2025-TS-1449-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)
Morris v. State, 2026-TS-00276-COA (dismissing untimely appeal)
Hill v. State, 2026-TS-00347-Dismissing appeal as untimely)
Daniels v. State, 2026-TS-00377-COA (allowing pro se appeal to proceed as timely)

Hand Down Page

June 2, 2026

Mhoon v. State, 2024-CA-00674-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion after an evidentiary hearing, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion after full consideration of the Miller factors.
(9-1-0: Emfinger for the Court: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Lee v. MDHS, 2025-SA-00318-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming denial of motion to reconsider denial of petition to set aside paternity judgment and child support order, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the petition for failure to meet statutory requirements or abuse its discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Days v. State, 2024-KA-00920-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of possession of meth with firearm enhancement and possession of a firearm as a felon, dismissing the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim without prejudice, and holding that arguments about the denial of an ore tenus motion to suppress were waived for failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress and that the plain-error doctrine did not apply.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Sullivan v. Sullivan, 2025-CP-00256-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s property division in a judgment of divorce, holding that the chancellor did not err in classification of the rental properties as marital assets but reversing with regard to other assets.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Harris v. State, 2025-KA-00084-COA (Criminal – Fel0ny)
Affirming convictions of first-degree murder an done count of aggravated assault, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error in giving an instruction that referenced accident and misfortune as well as self-defense.
(10-0: Westbrooks for the Court)

Lenoir v. State, 2024-KA-01342-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of trafficking a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance, holding the trial court did not err in failing to suppress evidence obtained during what the defendant argued was an invalid search warrant, that the trial court did not err in instructing the jury on constructive possession, that the evidence was sufficient to support the constructive possession conviction and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the indictment was not defective, and that he was not subject to double jeopardy.
(8-1-0: Carlton for the Court; Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Davis v. State, 2024-KA-01385-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one court of sexual battery and one count of touching a child for lustful purposes, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion instructing the jury on uncorroborated testimony of sex-crime victim and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Gaudin v. Gaudin, 2025-CA-00397-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s rulings granting divorce and distributing contested assets, holding that the chancellor did not err in ordering the sale of the marital home or in classification of assets and Ferguson factors.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Johnson v. State, 2024-KA-01097-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of more than two but less than ten grams of meth, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the impoundment and inventory search of the defendant’s vehicle in which the drugs were found were proper.
(6-3-1: Barnes for the Court; Wilson, Westbrooks, and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lassitter St. Pe’ concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Grant v. State, 2023-KA-01275-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon and possession of a stolen firearm, holding that the evidence was sufficient on both counts, that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence of gang affiliation for impeachment purposes or in admitting expert testimony regarding cellphone-location technology.
(6-1-3: Emfinger for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes and McDonald)

Other Orders

Smith v. Clarksdale Municipal School District, 2024-CA-00168-COA (denying rehearing)
UMMC v. Thomas, 2024-CA-01099-COA (denying rehearing)
Lovern v. State, 2024-KA-01449-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of November 6, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions today. There is a divorce case, an adoption case, and two felony convictions.

Edwards v. Edwards, 2023-CA-01334-SCT (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgement of divorce awarding ex-husband primary physical custody, holding that the trial court did not err in its Albright analysis, did not err in denying the motion for new trial, and did not err in denying a motion for recusal.
(8-0: Branning for the Court; Coleman did not participate)

Practice Point – The Court discussed the failure to make specific findings of fact when conducting an Albright analysis:

Mayfield v. State, 2024-KA-00822-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of sexual battery, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-0: Branning for the Court)

Moody v. State, 2025-KA-00022-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of methamphetamine, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence.
(9-0: Maxwell for the Court)

Note – Here is the Court’s preview of the evidence.

Hines v. Caldwell, 2024-CA-00921-SCT (Civil – Adoption)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision granting foster parents’ petition for adoption, holding that the adoptive parents were not contractually barred from seeking adoption before exhaustion of family placement with CPS and that judicial estoppel did not apply.
(9-0: King for the Court)

Other Orders

In Re: The Rules of Civil Procedure, 89-R-99001-SCT (denying letter motion)
In Re: Local Rules, 89-R-99015-SCT (granting motion seeking approval of revisions to the Local Rules for the Fifth Chancery Court District)
Ramsey v. State, 2023-CT-00440-SCT (denying cert petition as untimely)
Foote v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport, 2023-CT-00504-SCT (denying cert)
Watkins Construction, Inc. v. Mississippi Department of Revenue, 2024-SA-00662-SCT (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of May 12, 2022

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down six opinions today with subject matter covering capital murder conviction and death penalty, UM/UMI coverage, election contests, appellate procedure, wills, and judicial estoppel.

Johnson v. Brock, 2020-EC-00982-SCT (Civil – Election Contest/Summary Judgment)
Affirming summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ contest the results of a city counsel election, holding that the plaintiffs failed to satisfy their burden in opposing summary judgment where the plaintiffs’ briefs relied upon affidavits that were not in the record and they otherwise failed to come forward with evidence that there were voting irregularities that led to their election losses.
(Justice King did not participate.)

Bufkin v. Geico Insurance Agency, Inc., 2021-CA-00251-SCT (Civil – Insurance/UM/UIM)
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the UM carrier, declining to overrule precedent holding that an employee is not legally entitled to make a claim under their employers’ underinsured motorist coverage.
(All justices concurred.)

Note – The plaintiff argued Mississippi’s law on this question of statutory interpretation was the minority approach and urged the Supreme Court to adopt the majority view. The Supreme Court declined to do so:

McRae v. Mitchell, 2021-IA-00101-SCT (Civil – Other/Interlocutory Appeal/Appellate Procedure)
Dismissing an appeal from a non-final judgment of the chancery court, explaining that the Mississippi Supreme Court treated the notice of appeal as a petition for interlocutory appeal and granted the petition, but held that it lacked jurisdiction since the notice of appeal was not filed within 21 days of after the entry of the non-final judgment.
(Chief Justice Randolph did not participate.)

Clark v. State, 2019-DP-00689-SCT (Criminal – Death Penalty – Direct Appeal)
Affirming conviction of capital murder and sentence to death by lethal injection for the slaying of a convenience store clerk in Canton, Mississippi. The issues raised on appeal that the Mississippi Supreme Court addressed were:

(Justice Kitchens dissented, joined by Justice King and Justice Ishee. Justice King dissented, joined by Justice Kitchens and Justice Ishee.)

NOTE – The majority opinion is 99 pages long plus 13 pages of appendices. There are 34 pages of dissents. The curt summary above does not do this opinion justice because I simply do not have the bandwidth to tackle the details of this opinion at this moment.

Estate of Bakarich v. Bakarich, 2020-IA-00339-SCT (Civil – Wills, Trusts, and Estates/Interlocutory Appeal)
Affirming the chancellor’s denial of the co-executrices’ request based on a fee-shifting provision in the will seeking to make a challenger pay the estate’s attorney’s fees in defending challenges to the co-executrices’ actions, but reversing the the chancellor’s decision directing the co-executrices to personally pay the estate’s costs and attorney’s fees associated with the underlying motions and petitions.
(Justice King concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Justice Kitchens. Justice Beam did not participate.)

Jones v. Alcorn State University, 2020-CA-01238-SCT (Civil – Other/Judicial Estoppel)
Affirming the dismissal of the plaintiff’s breach of contract lawsuit, holding that the plaintiff’s lawsuit was barred by the doctrine of judicial estoppel because the plaintiff failed to reveal his lawsuit in two bankruptcy filings.
(Justice Maxwell [1] wrote a special concurrence, joined by Chief Justice Randolph (who wrote the majority opinion)[2], Justice Coleman [3], Justice Beam [4], and Justice Chamberlin [5], and by Justice Griffis in part. Justice Griffis concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by justice Kitchens.)

Question – What is the effect of a five-justice special concurrence from a nine-member court? Anything other than letting future litigants know that a majority of the court agrees whatever propositions are in the special concurrence? I will look into it later, but I do not know the answer off the top of my head.

Other Orders

Augustine v. State, 2019-CT-01467-SCT (denying motion for rehearing)
Johnson v. State, 2019-CT-01801-SCT (dismissing cert petition)
Figueroa v. State, 2020-CT-00114-SCT (denying cert petition)
Piccaluga v. State, 2020-CT-00346-SCT (denying cert petition)

Hand Down List Page

One more thing – At some point early this morning this blog had its 1,000th unique visit and passed 1,800 total hits in the three months since I launched it. Many thanks to those who have visited, subscribed, and shared the blog and to those who have provided encouragement and helpful feedback. I hope that it has been and continues to be a useful resource.