Tag: Felony

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of June 16, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down four opinions today. There is a divorce case with an interesting forgery issue. There is also a negligent-versus-intentional-conduct tort case case. The other two are a felony appeal and a med mal verdict appeal.

Lavant v. State, 2024-KA-00953-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of aggravated trafficking of a controlled substance, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting cross-examination of a State’s witness.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Merritt v. Merritt, 2024-CA-01158-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision denying a motion to set aside and nullify judgment of divorce based on a claim of forgery, holding that the chancellor abused his discretion in denying relief because the movant proved by clear and convincing evidence that the divorce was procured by fraud and misrepresentations by the respondent or his attorney.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Note – This one is wild.

Brent v. Ridgeway, 2024-CA-01238-COA (Civil – Torts)
Reversing on direct appeal and affirming on cross appeal after a jury verdict for negligent infliction of emotional distress, holding that there was no basis for a claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress because all alleged acts by the defendant were intentional.
(6-1: Emfinger for the Court; Carlton, Lawrence, and McCarty did not participate)

Practice Point – This opinion is an interesting continuation of a line of cases that intentional acts cannot support claims of negligence.

Greer v. Vicksburg Healthcare, LLC, 2024-CA-00809-COA (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the trial court’s denial of the plaintiff’s motion for JNOV after a defense verdict, holding that the jury’s verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-1: Wilson for the Court; McDonald concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Other Orders

  • Oates v. State, 2024-KA-00267-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Barnes v. City of McComb, 2024-CA-00989-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Smith v. Dennis Wright & Son Plumbing, 2025-WC-00046-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Triple Issue: Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of May 19, May 26, and June 2, 2026

I got covered up with paying work and had to let things slide around here for a bit. Here is three weeks of output from the prolific Mississippi Court of Appeals.

May 19, 2026

Small v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections, 2025-CP-00654-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming circuit court’s order denying complaint for judicial review, holding that the petitioner did not prove that MDOC’s decision was not supported by credible evidence, arbitrary or capricious, beyond MDOC’s scope of powers, or violative of constitutional rights.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

In Re: Order of Direct Criminal Contempt for Assistant District Attorney Andrew Willcutt, 2024-CA-01142-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing order holding an ADA in direct criminal contempt, holding that the ADA was entitled to notice of the charges against him and a de novo hearing before another judge.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Rush v. State, 2024-KA-01353-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of three counts of receiving stolen property, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the verdicts were not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Butler v. State, 2024-KA-00747-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that there was no error in admitting video to rebut the defendant’s testimony, that the use of impeachment evidence in closing was not improper, that admitting a heat of passion manslaughter instruction was not error, that the manslaughter instruction was not unconstitutional, that the claim for ineffective assistance of counsel was not ripe, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Brown v. State, 2025-CA-00428-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the trial court’s dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding it time-barred.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Gates v. State, 2024-CP-00074-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding it time-barred.
(7-3-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson, Westbrooks, and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Foreman v. State, 2024-KA-00728-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-2-1: Lawrence for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing; Carlton dissented without writing)

Waste Management of Mississippi, Inc. v. Chickasaw County, Mississippi, 2025-CA-00378-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s decisions denying summary judgment for Waste Management and granting summary judgment in favor of the County that sought to exercise an option to extend a solid waste agreement, holding that Mississippi law does not permit such agreements for more than 30 years so the plain language allowing for an extension to the extent it was consistent with Mississippi prevented the extension.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Rehm v. Robinson Property Group, LLC, 2025-CA-00043-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming the dismissal of a personal injury on judicial estoppel grounds, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion dismissing the claim where the plaintiff failed to disclose the lawsuit during bankruptcy proceedings.
(7-3: Carlton for the Court; McDonald dissented without writing; Westbrooks dissented, joined by McDonald and McCarty)

Other Orders

  • Jenkins v. Jenkins, 2024-CA-00395-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Brown v. State, 2024-KA-00489-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Eloby v. State, 2024-KA-00529-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Jones v. State, 2024-KA-00760-COA (denying rehearing)

May 26, 2026

Coahoma County, Mississippi School District v. Williams, 2024-CA-00977-COA (Civil – Other)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision and rendering a decision in favor of the school board’s termination decision, holding that the school board’s decision to terminate a counselor who had an incident with another school counselor and said she needed a “license to carry” was supported by substantial evidence, that the chancery court exceeded the scope of review, and that the counselor’s due process rights were not violated.
(9-1-0: McCarty for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result only without written opinion)

Murphy v. State, 2024-KA-00664-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of attempted touching of a child for lustful purposes, holding that arguments related to jury instructions were procedurally barred for failure to raise then in a JNOV or new trial and, in any event, that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion instructing the jury.
(9-1-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without separate written opinion)

Banks v. Banks, 2025-CA-00119-COA, consolidated with 2023-CA-00515-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Reversing on direct appeal and cross appeal in a divorce case, holding that the chancellor erred in the equitable distribution of the marital estate, in awarding alimony, and in awarding attorney’s fees.
(8-2-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson and Lassitter St. Pe’ concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Qualls v. Qualls, 2023-KA-01112-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of being a felon in possession of a weapon following a fatal shooting at a bar but vacating and remanding the sentencing as violent habitual offender as the State conceded that the evidence at trial was not sufficient to establish habitual-offender status.
(8-0: Westbrooks for the Court; Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Watson v. State, 2024-KA-01149-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of felony child abuse, holding that arguments that the trial court erred by admitting testimony of prior bad acts were procedurally barred for lack of objection after the State filed a notice of intent to introduce the evidence before trial and that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions, and declining to address the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims.
(9-0: Wilson for the Court)

Patriot Inspects, LLC v. McKenzie, 2024-CA-01000-COA (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the trial court’s decision denying a motion to compel arbitration, holding that the arbitration provision’s limitation of liability and one-year limitations period were substantively unconscionable and so intertwined with the agreement that the agreement was rendered unconscionable.
(6-4: Weddle for the Court; Wilson dissented, joined by Barnes, Carlton, and Emfinger)

NOTE – I am putting this one on cert watch. Citing the Federal Arbitration Act, the dissent took issue with the majority’s holding that the arbitration agreement was rendered unconscionable by the limitation of liability and limitations period.

Other Orders

  • Moore v. State, 2024-KA-2024-01129-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Leggett v. State, 2024-CP-01214-COA (recalling mandate and accepting pro se motion for rehearing as timely)
  • Winn v. State, 2024-KA-01280-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Johnson v. State, 2024-KA-01348-COA (granting appellant’s pro se motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing)
  • Johnson v. State, 2025-TS-01344-COA (dismissing motion for post-conviction collateral relief for lack of jurisdiction)
  • Gray v. State, 2025-TS-1449-COA (dismissing appeal as untimely)
  • Morris v. State, 2026-TS-00276-COA (dismissing untimely appeal)
  • Hill v. State, 2026-TS-00347-Dismissing appeal as untimely)
  • Daniels v. State, 2026-TS-00377-COA (allowing pro se appeal to proceed as timely)

Hand Down Page

June 2, 2026

Mhoon v. State, 2024-CA-00674-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of PCR motion after an evidentiary hearing, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion after full consideration of the Miller factors.
(9-1-0: Emfinger for the Court: Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Lee v. MDHS, 2025-SA-00318-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming denial of motion to reconsider denial of petition to set aside paternity judgment and child support order, holding that the trial court did not err in denying the petition for failure to meet statutory requirements or abuse its discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Days v. State, 2024-KA-00920-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of possession of meth with firearm enhancement and possession of a firearm as a felon, dismissing the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim without prejudice, and holding that arguments about the denial of an ore tenus motion to suppress were waived for failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress and that the plain-error doctrine did not apply.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Sullivan v. Sullivan, 2025-CP-00256-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the chancellor’s property division in a judgment of divorce, holding that the chancellor did not err in classification of the rental properties as marital assets but reversing with regard to other assets.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Harris v. State, 2025-KA-00084-COA (Criminal – Fel0ny)
Affirming convictions of first-degree murder an done count of aggravated assault, holding that the trial court did not commit plain error in giving an instruction that referenced accident and misfortune as well as self-defense.
(10-0: Westbrooks for the Court)

Lenoir v. State, 2024-KA-01342-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of trafficking a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance, holding the trial court did not err in failing to suppress evidence obtained during what the defendant argued was an invalid search warrant, that the trial court did not err in instructing the jury on constructive possession, that the evidence was sufficient to support the constructive possession conviction and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, that the indictment was not defective, and that he was not subject to double jeopardy.
(8-1-0: Carlton for the Court; Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing; Weddle did not participate)

Davis v. State, 2024-KA-01385-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one court of sexual battery and one count of touching a child for lustful purposes, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion instructing the jury on uncorroborated testimony of sex-crime victim and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Gaudin v. Gaudin, 2025-CA-00397-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s rulings granting divorce and distributing contested assets, holding that the chancellor did not err in ordering the sale of the marital home or in classification of assets and Ferguson factors.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Johnson v. State, 2024-KA-01097-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of more than two but less than ten grams of meth, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the impoundment and inventory search of the defendant’s vehicle in which the drugs were found were proper.
(6-3-1: Barnes for the Court; Wilson, Westbrooks, and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lassitter St. Pe’ concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Grant v. State, 2023-KA-01275-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon and possession of a stolen firearm, holding that the evidence was sufficient on both counts, that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence of gang affiliation for impeachment purposes or in admitting expert testimony regarding cellphone-location technology.
(6-1-3: Emfinger for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Barnes and McDonald)

Other Orders

  • Smith v. Clarksdale Municipal School District, 2024-CA-00168-COA (denying rehearing)
  • UMMC v. Thomas, 2024-CA-01099-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Lovern v. State, 2024-KA-01449-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Double Issue: Supreme Court Decisions of May 21 and May 28, 2026

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion last week and three this week. Two are custody cases, one is a direct criminal appeal, and one is a wrongful death case up on the issue of whether an arbitration agreement is enforceable. There are three Bar matters and one order amending the MRAP among the “Other Orders.”

May 21, 2026

Solop v. Solop, 2025-CA-01513-SCT (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision denying the father’s motion to delegate non-custodial time to his parents during his upcoming deployment, holding that the chancellor did not err in applying section 93-5-34 and did abuse her discretion awarding only extended visitation to the grandparents during the deployment.
(7-o: Branning for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Johnson v. State, 2024-CT-0065-SCT (dismissing notice construed as cert petition)
  • Hewitt v. TJM Properties, Inc., 2024-CA-01312-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Strickland v. The Mississippi Bar, 2026-BR-00352-SCT (granting dismissal of reinstatement petition for noncompliance)

Hand Down Page

May 28, 2026

Shipley v. Shipley, 2023-CT-00814-SCT (Civil – Custody)
Affirming in part and reversing in part on cert, holding that the chancellor did not err by not appointing a GAL, but that the chancellor did not perform a proper Albright analysis and reversed the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the chancellor.
(7-0: King for the Court)

Practice Point – The Supreme Court specifically addressed whether the appointment of a mandatory GAL can be waived:

Zattoni v. State, 2024-KA-01382-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of kidnapping and felon in possession of a weapon, holding that the trial court erred by not accepting a stipulation that the defendant was a convicted felon until after the State has put on its case in chief and that the trial court erred in admitting an unredacted audio recording of the defendant’s interview with police on the basis that it was after he had been Mirandized without considering Rule 404(b) or Rule 403, but concluding that the errors were harmless.
(7-0: Sullivan for the Court)

Hubbard v. Nexion Health at Clinton, Inc., 2025-CP-00019-SCT, consolidated with Hubbard v. Estes, No. 2025-CP-00386-SCT (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Reversing the circuit court’s grant of a motion to compel arbitration, holding that the record contained insufficient evidence to establish the son’s authority to bind the father to arbitration when signing paperwork during the father’s admission to a rehab facility.
(7-0: Branning for the Court)

Other Orders

  • In Re: Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure, 89-R-99027-SCT (amending the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure)
  • The Mississippi Bar v. Valley, 2008-BD-01884-SCT (suspending respondent from the practice of law)
  • Wooten v. State, 2023-CT-01318-SCT (denying cert)
  • Fields v. State, 2024-CT-00807-SCT (denying cert)
  • Hessler v. The Mississippi Bar, 2024-BR-01041-SCT (granting reinstatement from deferred suspension)
  • Jackson v. State, 2025-M-01401 (denying response to order denying recusal and renewed request for appointment of special justices)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of April 23, 2026

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down three opinions today. The headliner is a decision in Phil and Deborah Bryant’s lawsuit against Mississippi Today. There is also a first-degree murder case and a civil lack-of-prosecution case.

First Security Bank v. Richmond, 2025-IA-00012-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Reversing the chancery court’s decision to deny one defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute and grant one for another defendant, holding it was an abuse of discretion for its disparate treatment of the defendants’ Rule 41(b) motions.
(7-0: Branning for the Court)

Johnson v. State, 2024-KA-01140-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not err instructing the jury, the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress evidence from a warrantless search because the inevitable-discovery doctrine applied, that the claim of error related to the introduction of body-camera video was procedurally barred, that the Court’s sustaining of an objection to defense counsel making biblical references during closing did not warrant reversal, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-0: King for the Court)

Bryant v. Deep South Today, 2025-CA-00380-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Reversing the trial court’s grant of the defendants’ 12(b)(6) motion, holding that the plaintiffs sufficiently pleaded claims of defamation, false light, and loss of consortium and dismissing as moot the plaintiffs’ appeal of the denial of their motions for partial summary judgment.
(7-0: Coleman for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Cunningham v. State, 2023-CT-01213-SCT (denying cert)
  • Russell v. Booneville Police Department, 2024-CT-00757-SCT (dismissing pro se “petition for rehearing”)
  • In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2026-AD-00001-SCT (directing the disbursement of $157,868.74 in civil legal assistance funds among the MS Center for Legal Services, MS Volunteer Lawyers Project, and North MS Rural Legal Services)
  • Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Thomas, 2026-JP-00402-SCT (ordering suspension with pay from all duties pending further and denying motion to seal the order)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 21, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. There were two felony appeals, two domestic/custody decisions, and two PCR decisions.

Brents v. Holland, 2024-CA-01198-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a custody matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding a material change in circumstances adversely affecting the children and that modification was in their best interest and that the chancellor did not err in not keeping siblings together where this issue was not raised until appeal, and that the chancellor did not err in ordering supervised visitation despite the GAL’s recommendation.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Johnson v. State, 2025-KA-00549-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming re-sentencing under Miller, holding that the circuit court did not err in sentencing the defendant to life without parole.
(9-0: McDonald for the Court; Emfinger did not participate)

Benamon v. State, 2024-KA-00501-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to quash the venire after the defendant briefly appeared in the courtroom prior to voir dire in handcuffs and shackles or in refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of heat-of-passion manslaughter.
(8-2-0: Wilson for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concur in part and in the result without writing)

Rudd v. State, 2025-CP-00618-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a PCR motion attacking an order of revocation, holding that it was properly dismissed as an impermissible successive motion.
(9-0: Wilson for the Court; Emfinger did not participate)

Self v. Conley, 2024-SA-01079-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s final order on child support and visitation, holding that the chancery court did not abuse its discretion in declining to find the father in contempt and imprison him and that the chancellor did not err in awarding visitation despite the father’s “unclean hands.”
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Castillo-Valencia v. State, 2025-CP-00348-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming denial of claims and dismissal of motion for PCR, holding that the motion was properly dismissed as successive, time barred, and without statutory exception.
(9-0: Barnes for the Court; Emfinger did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Williams v. State, 2024-KA-00257-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Price v. Hinds County School District, 2024-CA-00841-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Banks v. State, 2024-KA-00881-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Roberts v. State, 2024-CA-00988-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Wilson v. P.L. Marketing, Inc., 2025-WC-00158-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 14, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down eight opinions yesterday. The Court reversed a capital murder conviction and also decided a will contest case, a custody case, three other felony appeals, a PCR case, and a divorce case.

Greene v. State, 2024-KA-00333-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of one count of capital murder, holding that the trial court erred by failing to give the jury a cautionary instruction on accomplice testimony and remanded for a new trial.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

In the Matter of Estate of Williams: Williams v. Myles, 2024-CA-01114-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a will contest, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that decedent lacked testamentary capacity when she executed her will and that the will was invalid because of undue influence.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Singleton v. State, 2024-KA-01095-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion instructing the jury and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(9-1-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

In the Interests of J.S.: Betsi S. v. Mississippi Dept. of Child Protective Services, 2024-CP-01061-COA (Civil – Custody)
Affirming the youth court’s permanency decision, holding that the mother was not deprived or due process, that recusal was not required, that the motion for ADA accommodation was abandoned, and that the mother was not entitled to damages.
(9-1-0: McCarty for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing)

Practice Point – When writing a response or reply, do not talk past the arguments made by the other side:

Gardner v. State, 2025-KA-00298-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming convictions of possession of a firearm by a felon, trafficking of fentanyl, and aggravated trafficking of meth, holding that the conviction of constructive possession of fentanyl was supported by sufficient evidence and that verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Stasher v. Stasher, 2024-CA-01302-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s decisions in a divorce matter, holding that the chancellor did not manifestly or clearly err in granting divorce based on habitual cruel and inhuman treatment or in finding that the ex-husband had engaged in adultery during the marriage and that his claims about equitable distribution were without merit.
(10-0: Lawrence for the Court)

Jackson v. State, 2024-KA-01346-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of touching a child for lustful purposes, holding that the circuit court did not err in the admission of hearsay testimony and that although it was an abuse of discretion to admit a written statement that error was harmless.
(8-2-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson and Emfinger concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Leggett v. State, 2024-CP-01214-COA, consolidated with 2024-CP-01215-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming summary dismissal of two PCR motions.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Clark v. State, 2023-KA-01116-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Fraser v. State, 2023-KA-01129-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Seals v. State, 2024-KM-00448-COA (denying rehearing)
  • ABL Management, Inc. v. Rowell, 2024-CA-01007-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Daengbunga v. State, 2024-KA-01122-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Simoneaux v. State, 2024-CP-01127-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Pedrego v. State, 2025-TS-01282-COA (denying pro se motion for reconsideration of dismissal of appeal)
  • Reeves v. State, 2026-TS-00201-COA (order allowing appeal to proceed as timely)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of April 7, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. There are two appeals of felony convictions, a breach of contract case, a medical malpractice/wrongful death/savings statute case, a zoning ordinance case, and a PCR case.

Vu v. State, 2024-KA-01117-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of burglary, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and that the issue of whether prior bad acts were not properly admitted was waived, and dismissing the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim without prejudice.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Magdi Corporation v. Beruk Construction, Inc., 2024-CA-01310-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the dismissal of a breach of contract case after a bench trial, holding that the chancellor manifestly erred by granting an involuntary dismissal based on a finding that the subject construction project had reached “substantial completion” and that the plaintiff’s failure to pay at that point put the plaintiff in breach.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Burdine v. State, 2025-KA-00154-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of felony voyeurism and three counts of indecent exposure, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting the contents of the defendant’s cell phone, that there was sufficient evidence supporting the convictions, that the trial court did not err in admitting lay opinions, that the State proved the elements for habitual sentencing, and that the two life sentences were not constitutionally disproportionate.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Humphrey v. State, 2024-CP-01444-COA (Civil – PCR)
Vacating and rendering the trial court’s judgment denying the petitioner’s Rule 60(b)(6) motion, holding that the circuit co0urt lacked jurisdiction.
(10-0)

Knight v. Glover, 2024-CA-01157-COA (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Reversing the dismissal of a medical malpractice case based on the statute of limitations, holding that the suit was not time-barred because it was filed within one year of the dismissal of the first suit without prejudice and was thus saved by the savings statute.
(6-4: Wilson for the Court; Emfinger dissented, joined by Barnes, Carlton, and McCarty)

Haman Construction, LLC v. Marshall County Board of Supervisors, 2025-CA-00340-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Reversing the circuit court’s decision affirming the Board’s denial of a petition to amend zoning ordinances, holding that the decision was arbitration and capricious because it was based on the incorrect interpretation of controlling ordinances.
(6-1-2: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court; McCarty dissented, joined by Carlton, and joined in part by Barnes and McDonald)

Other Orders

  • Thornton v. Thornton, 2024-CA-00320-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Bodie v. State, 2024-KA-00634-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Polk v. State, 2025-CP-00260-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of March 31, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals closed out the month with eleven opinions yesterday. The decisions cover felonies, workers’ comp, real property, termination of parental rights, domestic abuse protection order, heirship, foreclosure/service of process, rezoning , and PCR.

Muhammad v. State, 2024-KA-00440-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of one count of aggravated domestic violence, holding that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of prior bad acts and that the defendant was prejudiced by the ruling.
(8-1-1: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court; Lawrence concurred in part and in the result without writing; Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part without writing)

Braxton v. State, 2025-CP-00051-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the arguments were waived by pleading guilty.
(10-0: Weddle for the Court)

Morris v. State, 2024-CP-00580-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming the summary denial of a PCR motion, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a preliminary hearing and that the substantive arguments were without merit.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Jones v. Brown, 2025-CA-00031-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision on a petition to determine heirs, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the putative heir did not prove heirship by clear and convincing evidence.
(6-4-0: Emfinger for the Court; McCarty and Weddle concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Sievers v. Faucheaux-Sievers, 2024-CA-01112-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancery court’s decision issuing a new domestic abuse protection order, holding that the chancellor did not abuse her discretion in entering a final protection order and that the defendant was not entitled to a voluntary dismissal.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson concurred in result only without writing)

Armstrong v. State, 2024-KA-01217-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two drug charges, holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to suppress evidence found pursuant to two search warrants.
(9-1-0: Lawrence for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing)

J.R.M. v. Warren County Dept. of CPS, 2024-CA-00984-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the youth court’s termination of parental rights, holding that there was sufficient evidence to support the youth court’s finding that the father failed to exercise reasonable visitation.
(10-0: Wilson for the Court)

Smith v. Dennis Wright & Son Plumbing, 2025-WC-00046-COA (Civil – Workers’ Compensation)
Affirming the Commission’s decision, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that the claimant did not sustain a compensable left shoulder injury.
(10-0: Carlton for the Court)

Note/Disclosure – I handled this appeal for the Employer/Carrier.

Taylor v. State, 2024-KA-00280-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of sexual battery and one count of gratification of lust against a minor, holding that the arguments that the indictment was defective for overbreadth and vagueness were waived and without merit, that arguments that hearsay testimony was not properly admitted for lack of a proper tender-years hearing were waived and without merit, and that arguments that the State improperly bolstered testimony was waived for lack of objection.
(9-1-0: Barnes for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing)

OneWest Bank, FSB v. Brown-Wood, 2024-CA-01125-COA (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision in a foreclosure matter, holding that the chancellor did not err in granting a motion to set aside a prior order granting an extension of time to serve process, denying a motion for leave to amend, or in dismissing a complaint for judicial foreclosure.
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Feather v. City of Saltillo, 2024-CA-00831-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s decision to affirm the City’s approval of a rezoning application, holding that the Board’s decision that a public need existed was “fairly debatable” and would not be disturbed on appeal.
(5-4: Westbrooks for the Court; Emfinger dissented without writing; Wilson dissented, jioned by Carlton, McCarty, and Emfinger; Weddle did not participate)

Other Orders

  • J.T.S. v. M.L.S., 2024-CA-00023-COA (denying rehearing)
  • CNRS&Z Inc., v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, 2024-CA-00365-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Shelton v. State, 2024-CA-00435-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Chavers v. State, 2024-KA-00551-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Estate of Dorsey v. Matory, 2024-CA-00925-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Rasbeery v. State, 2024-KA-01005-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 26, 2026

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down four opinions today. Two are med mal cases, one of which addresses the application of statutory immunity for medical treatment during the COVID state of emergency. The other med mal case was up on an arbitration issue. The other two cases are direct criminal appeals. There is a judicial performance matter among the “other orders.”

Secrist v. Rush Medical Foundation, 2024-CA-01034-SCT (Civil – Med Mal)
Affirming the dismissal of a medical malpractice case, holding that the trial court did not err in finding that the defendant medical providers were immune under section 11-71-7 (Supp. 2025) which provides legal immunity for healthcare providers for healthcare services performed during the COVID-19 state of emergency.
(4-2: Griffis for the Court; Coleman specially concurred, joined in part by Randolph, Ishee, Griffis, and Sullivan; King concurred in result only without writing; Branning did not participate)

Note – Coleman’s specially concurred to discuss the role of legislative history in judicial decision-making:

…

Mallette v. Revette, 2024-CA-01277-SCT (Civil – Wrongful Death)
Affirming the circuit court’s denial of a motion to compel arbitration, holding that the trial court’s finding of fact regarding the authenticity of the signature was entitled to deference, that the defendants did not carry their burden of proving actual authority, and that direct-benefits estoppel did not apply.
(7-0: Coleman for the Court)

Gardner v. State, 2023-CT-00903-SCT, consolidated with 2018-KA-01337-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming in part and reversing in part the Court of Appeals and reinstating and affirming the circuit court’s judgment, holding that the argument that the trial court erred by admitting prior felony convictions into evidence was procedurally barred by failure to object at trial and that there was no plain error.
(4-2-1: Randolph for the Court; Coleman concurred in part and in the result without writing; King dissented, joined by Sullivan and joined in part by Coleman)

House v. State, 2024-KA-01432-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder, holding that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-0: Coleman for the Court)

Other Orders

  • In Re: Gibson, 2024-CP-01303-SCT (per curiam affirmance)
  • In Re: Local Rules, 89-R-99015-SCT (granting motion to rescind a local rule in the First Chancery District)
  • Taylor v. State, 2023-CT-00738-SCT (denying cert)
  • Dew v. Greenwood Leflore Consolidated School District, 2024-CA-00067-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Mississippi Commission of Judicial Performance v. Littleton, 2026-JP-00306-SCT (suspending a county court judge without pay pending further order of the Court)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of March 12 and March 19, 2026

I am a bit behind because I was out of the office last week, and yesterday I had court in Neshoba County. The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down one opinion last week and six opinions this week. Last week’s opinion was an election context. Of the six this week, three were dismissals of appeals from youth court restitution orders, two were appeals of felony convictions (with one reversal) and the other was a real property case.

March 12, 2026

Randle v. Ivy, 2025-EC-00299-SCT (Civil – Election Contest)
Affirming the special judge’s decision in an election contest, holding that the issue was moot after the election and that there was substantial evidence to support the decision that the primary-election candidate did not meet the residency requirement.
(7-0: King for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Arbor Landing Homeowners’ Association, Inc. v. Rankin County Development Group, LLC, 2025-IA-01286-SCT (granting interlocutory appeal)

Hand Down Page

March 19, 2026

In Re: Interest of L.L., A Minor, 2024-CA-00872-SCT (Civil – Juvenile Justice)
Dismissing appeal from a youth court restitution order, holding that the order was not a final, appealable order.
(6-1: Branning for the Court; King dissented without writing)

Gibson v. State, 2024-KA-01301-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Reversing conviction of second degree murder, holding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a jury instruction for excusable homicide.
(4-3: Sullivan for the Court; Randolph dissented, joined by Griffis and Branning)

In the Interest of R.H., a Minor, 2024-CA-00873-SCT (Civil – Juvenile Justice)
Dismissing an appeal of a restitution order from youth court, holding that it was not a final, appealable order.
(6-1: Griffis for the Court; King dissented without writing)

Hewitt v. TJM Properties, Inc., 2024-CA-01312-SCT (Civil – Real Property)
Affirming the chancellor’s dismissal of a claim for reimbursement and property-based claims by a developer who never acquired title to the subject property, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that the plaintiff lacked a legally cognizable property interest.
(7-0: Ishee for the Court)

McDaniel v. State, 2025-KA-00202-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of second degree murder, holding that trial counsel was not ineffective for not requesting an accidental homicide instruction, that there was no abuse of discretion granting jury instruction on deliberate design, and that the conviction was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(7-0: Randolph for the Court)

In the Interest of D.G., a Minor, 2024-CA-00868-SCT (Civil – Juvenile Justice)
Dismissing an appeal of a youth court restitution order, holding that it was not a final, appealable order.
(6-1: Ishee for the Court; King dissented without writing)

Other Orders

  • Snyder v. Pilger, 2024-CT-00460-SCT (denying cert)
  • The Mississippi Bar v. Newcomb, 2025-BD-00835-SCT (suspending from the practice of law for two years retroactive to Aug. 22, 2022)
  • In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 2026-AD-00001-SCT (ordering (1) that the AOC shall be authorized to disclose to the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance information gathered in compliance with 2025 Extraordinary Session House Bill 38, Section 34, as well as any other information pertaining to youth courts that would reasonably lead to the investigation of judicial misconduct and (2) that the Commission shall not disseminate or otherwise disclose any information it receives from AOC pertaining to Youth Courts except as necessary to recommend discipline in accordance with the Rules of the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance)

Hand Down Page